blob: 56628c553cfc302c9663f72802990fc68a85955d (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
Network Working Group L. Peter Deutsch (PARC-MAXC)
Request for Comments: 567 September 6, 1973
NIC #18970
CROSS-COUNTRY NETWORK BANDWIDTH
The following computation of cross-country network bandwidth was
contributed by Butler Lampson of PARC.
Consider what happens when a TIP user on the West Coast, connected to a
full-duplex Host on the East Coast, strikes a key on his terminal.
The TIP sends a one-character message (1 packet).
The destination IMP sends a RFNM (1 packet).
The destination Host sends an ALLocate - this seems to be the strategy
used by TENEX Hosts, at least (1 packet).
Thc TIP sends a RFNM for the ALLocate (1 packet).
The same sequence repeats itself, with roles interchanged, for the echo
character (4 packets).
This constitutes 4 packets or 4OOO bits in each direction. The current
cross-country transmission capability of the ARPANET is 3 5OKb phone
lines; ergo, it can only support 3*50000/4000=37.5 such characters per
second!
It may be that RFNMs are transmitted between IMPs more efficiently; at
best this can only double the network capacity.
This computation may help explain why cross-country TIP users (e.g. the
substantial West Coast community of BBN-TENEX users) experience such
bad echo response, at least in bursts: the network itself may be
experiencing momentary peak loads.
If this argument is correct, the proposed remote echoing facilities of
the new TELNET protocol could have a major effect on network operation.
|
