1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Gayraud
Request for Comments: 5908 Unaffiliated
Category: Standards Track B. Lourdelet
ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco Systems, Inc.
June 2010
Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6
Abstract
The NTP Server Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
IPv6 (DHCPv6) provides NTPv4 (Network Time Protocol version 4) server
location information to DHCPv6 hosts.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5908.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 1]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Requirements Notation ...........................................2
3. Related Work and Usage Model ....................................2
4. NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 ....................................3
4.1. NTP Server Address Suboption ...............................4
4.2. NTP Multicast Address Suboption ............................5
4.3. NTP Server FQDN Suboption ..................................6
5. Appearance of This Option .......................................6
6. Security Considerations .........................................7
7. RFC 4075 Deprecation ............................................7
8. IANA Considerations .............................................7
9. References ......................................................8
9.1. Normative References .......................................8
9.2. Informative References .....................................8
1. Introduction
This document defines a DHCPv6 option and associated suboptions to
provide Network Time Protocol version 4 [RFC5905] or greater server
location information to DHCPv6 hosts.
2. Requirements Notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. Related Work and Usage Model
The NTP service is publicly offered on the Internet by a number of
organizations. Those servers can be used but should not be abused,
so any method that is tasked to disseminate locations of NTP servers
must act responsibly in a manner that does not lead to public server
overloading. When using DHCPv6 to offer NTP server location, and if
there is a need to distribute a host with a hardcoded configuration,
this configuration MUST NOT include server location that is not part
of the organization that distributes this device. Typical usage of
this option is to specify an NTP server that is part of the
organization that operates the DHCPv6 server.
The location of the NTP service, like any other Internet service, can
be specified by an IP address or a Fully Qualified Domain Name
(FQDN). By design, DHCP offers information to multiple devices and
is prone to amplification of mistakes, so great care must be taken to
define its configuration. Specification of the NTP service by FQDN
offers a level of indirection that works as a possible mitigation
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 2]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
tool in case of misconfiguration. DNS can be used to redirect
misconfigured clients to an IPv6 address that is not configured on
any host instead of having to change the address of the NTP server
itself.
While the NTP specification defines a comprehensive set of
configuration parameters, modification of those parameters is best
left to the decision of the client itself. The DHCPv6 option for NTP
is therefore restricted to server location.
4. NTP Server Option for DHCPv6
This option serves as a container for server location information
related to one NTP server or Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
[RFC4330] server. This option can appear multiple times in a DHCPv6
message. Each instance of this option is to be considered by the NTP
client or SNTP client as a server to include in its configuration.
The option itself does not contain any value. Instead, it contains
one or several suboptions that carry NTP server or SNTP server
location. This option MUST include one, and only one, time source
suboption. The currently defined time source suboptions are
NTP_OPTION_SRV_ADDR, NTP_OPTION_SRV_MC_ADDR, and NTP_OPTION_SRV_FQDN.
It carries the NTP server or SNTP server location as a unicast or
multicast IPv6 address or as an NTP server or SNTP server FQDN. More
time source suboptions may be defined in the future. While the FQDN
option offers the most deployment flexibility, resiliency as well as
security, the IP address options are defined to cover cases where a
DNS dependency is not desirable.
If the NTP server or SNTP server location is an IPv6 multicast
address, the client SHOULD use this address as an NTP multicast group
address and listen to messages sent to this group in order to
synchronize its clock.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 3]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
The format of the NTP Server Option is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_NTP_SERVER | option-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| suboption-1 |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| suboption-2 |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| suboption-n |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
option-code: OPTION_NTP_SERVER (56),
option-len: Total length of the included suboptions.
This document does not define any priority relationship between the
client's embedded configuration (if any) and the NTP or SNTP servers
discovered via this option. In particular, the client is allowed to
simultaneously use its own configured NTP servers or SNTP servers and
the servers discovered via DHCP.
4.1. NTP Server Address Suboption
This suboption is intended to appear inside the OPTION_NTP_SERVER
option. It specifies the IPv6 unicast address of an NTP server or
SNTP server available to the client.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 4]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
The format of the NTP Server Address Suboption is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_ADDR | suboption-len = 16 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| |
| IPv6 address of NTP server |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6 address of the NTP server: An IPv6 address,
suboption-code: NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_ADDR (1),
suboption-len: 16.
4.2. NTP Multicast Address Suboption
This suboption is intended to appear inside the OPTION_NTP_SERVER
option. It specifies the IPv6 address of the IPv6 multicast group
address used by NTP on the local network.
The format of the NTP Multicast Address Suboption is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NTP_SUBOPTION_MC_ADDR | suboption-len = 16 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| |
| Multicast IPv6 address |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast IPv6 address: An IPv6 address,
suboption-code: NTP_SUBOPTION_MC_ADDR (2),
suboption-len: 16.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 5]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
4.3. NTP Server FQDN Suboption
This suboption is intended to appear inside the OPTION_NTP_SERVER
option. It specifies the FQDN of an NTP server or SNTP server
available to the client.
The format of the NTP Server FQDN Suboption is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_FQDN | suboption-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| FQDN of NTP server |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
suboption-code: NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_FQDN (3),
suboption-len: Length of the included FQDN field,
FQDN: Fully-Qualified Domain Name of the NTP server or SNTP server.
This field MUST be encoded as described in [RFC3315],
Section 8. Internationalized domain names are not allowed
in this field.
5. Appearance of This Option
The OPTION_NTP_SERVER option can appear multiple times in a DHCPv6
message. The order in which these options appear is not significant.
The client uses its usual algorithms to determine which server(s) or
multicast group(s) should be preferred to synchronize its clock.
The OPTION_NTP_SERVER option MUST NOT appear in messages other than
the following: Solicit, Advertise, Request, Renew, Rebind,
Information-Request, and Reply. If this option appears in messages
other than those specified above, the receiver MUST ignore it.
The option number for this option MAY appear in the "Option Request"
option [RFC3315] in the following messages: Solicit, Request, Renew,
Rebind, Information-Request, and Reconfigure. If this option number
appears in the "Option Request" option in messages other than those
specified above, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 6]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
6. Security Considerations
This option could be used by an intruder to advertise the address of
a malicious NTP server or SNTP server and adversely affect the clock
of clients on the network. The consequences of such an attack can be
critical, because many security protocols depend on time
synchronization to run their algorithms. As an example, an attacker
could break connectivity between SEND-enabled nodes [RFC3971], simply
by affecting the clock on these nodes.
To prevent these attacks, it is strongly advisable to secure the use
of this option by either:
- using the NTPv4 Autokey public key authentication, as defined in
[RFC5906] or,
- using authenticated DHCP as described in [RFC3315], Section 21.
7. RFC 4075 Deprecation
"Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6"
[RFC4075] provides some degree of automatic time server configuration
for IPv6, as it specifies how to transmit SNTP [RFC4330] server
addresses through DHCPv6. However, this approach is not suitable for
all NTP deployments. It is not an extensible mechanism and
introduces some semantic confusion through the use of the "SNTP"
acronym. Additionally, the approach of only offering IPv6 addresses
to specify server location does not meet NTP requirements that make
use of an FQDN (Fully-Qualified Domain Name) as well. For all the
abovementioned reasons, this document makes [RFC4075] deprecated.
8. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned 56 as an option code from the "DHCPv6 Options
Codes" registry for OPTION_NTP_SERVER.
IANA is required to maintain a new number space of NTP time source
suboptions, located in the BOOTP-DHCP Parameters Registry. The
initial suboptions are described in Section 4 of this document. IANA
assigns future NTP time source suboptions with an "IETF Consensus"
policy as described in [RFC5226]. Future proposed suboptions are to
be referenced symbolically in the documents that describe them, and
shall be assigned numeric codes by IANA when approved for publication
as an RFC.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 7]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
[RFC5905] Mills, D., Martin, J., Ed., Burbank, J., and W. Kasch,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms
Specification", RFC 5905, June 2010.
[RFC5906] Haberman, B., Ed. and D. Mills, "Network Time Protocol
Version 4: Autokey Specification", RFC 5906, June 2010.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC3971] Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B., and P. Nikander, "SEcure
Neighbor Discovery (SEND)", RFC 3971, March 2005.
[RFC4075] Kalusivalingam, V., "Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
Configuration Option for DHCPv6", RFC 4075, May 2005.
[RFC4330] Mills, D., "Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4
for IPv4, IPv6 and OSI", RFC 4330, January 2006.
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 8]
^L
RFC 5908 NTP Server Option for DHCPv6 June 2010
Authors' Addresses
Richard Gayraud
Unaffiliated
EMail: richardgayraud@free.fr
Benoit Lourdelet
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Village ent. GreenSide, Bat T3,
400, Av de Roumanille,
06410 BIOT - Sophia-Antipolis Cedex
France
Phone: +33 4 97 23 26 23
EMail: blourdel@cisco.com
Gayraud & Lourdelet Standards Track [Page 9]
^L
|
