summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc702.txt
blob: 8df55af11ef42617c884dddbed19e6abb765652a (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
Network Working Group                                 D.W. Dodds
RFC # 702                                             BBN-TENEXA
                                                      September 25, 1974


         SEPTEMBER, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS


LAST MONTH'S SURVEY PRODUCED A GRATIFYING AMOUNT OF FEEDBACK CLARIFYING
THE STATUS OF SEVERAL SITES; HOWEVER THERE HAVE BEEN VERY FEW CHANGES IN
THE STATUS OF HOST SERVERS.  THE CHANGES IN THIS MONTH'S LIST, IN
NUMERICAL ORDER (HOST NUMBER THROUGHOUT ARE OCTAL):

UCLA-NMC IS NO LONGER A SERVER;
HOST 205 IS NOW BBN-TENEXD, A NEW SYSTEM (BBNB) IS NOW HOST 61;
RAND-RCC WAS ACCIDENTALLY OMITTED FROM THE PREVIOUS LIST;
SDC-LAB HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY ELIMINATED FROM THE LIST UNTIL IT RETURNS
    TO THE NET;
I4-TENEXA (117) IS NOT A SERVER--KI4B-TENEX (217) IS, AND HAS BEEN ADDED
    TO THE LIST;
AMES-67 FIXED A BUG, REVEALING TO THE WORLD THE NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER (NO
    OPTIONS) THAT WAS THERE ALL ALONG;
ISI-DEVTENEX (226) AND USC-ECL (327) HAVE BEEN ADDED.

WHAT FOLLOWS IS AN UPDATE OF THE SUMMARY AND TABULATION THAT APPEARED
LAST MONTH.*  THERE IS STILL A LONG WAY TO GO TO 100% NEW-PROTOCOL
IMPLEMENTATION.

        TOTAL SERVER HOSTS            34             100%
        NO NEW-PROT SERVER            21              62%
        TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM.        13              38%
          NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27,
          OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2)          6              18%
          NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3)     6              18%
          NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY           1               3%

NOTES:
*   ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM RUN AT
    VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE DATA.  WHAT
    IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK AS SEEN BY THE
    NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 23 SEPT. 1974.
(2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING TO ALL
    PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM.
(3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW-PROTOCOL
    SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT TO
    COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS ACCORDING
    TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED.




Dodds                                                           [Page 1]
^L
RFC 702          SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS    September 1974


           TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES:


HOST    HOST            SOCKET         SOCKET    NEW-PROT, OPTIONS
 NO.    NAME              1             27       IMPLETMENTED(IF ANY)

101     UCLA-CCN        OLD             X
201     UCLA-CCBS       OLD             X
  2     SRI-ARC         OLD             X
102     SRI-AI          OLD             X
  3     UCSB-MOD75      OLD             X
  4     UTAH-10         OLD             X
105     BBN-TENEX       OLD             NEW      I1, 3, 6; O3
205     BBN TENEXD      OLD             NEW      I1, 3, 6; O3
305     BBN-TENEXA      OLD             NEW      I1, 3, 6; O3
106     MIT-DMS         NEW             NEW      I1, 3; O3
206     MIT-AI          OLD             X
306     MIT-ML          OLD             X
  7     RAND-RCC        OLD             X
 11     HARV-10         NEW             X        I1, 3; O3
 12     LL-67           OLD             X
112     LL-TX-2         OLD             X
 13     SU-AI           NEW*            NEW*     I1, 3
 15     CASE-10         OLD             X
 16     CMU-10B         NEW             NEW      I1, 3; O3
116     CMU-10A         NEW             NEW      I1, 3; O3
 17     I4-TENEX        OLD             X
217     KI4B-TENEX      OLD             X
 20     AMES-67         NEW             NEW      NONE
126     USC-ISI         OLD             X
226     ISI-DEVTENEX    OLD             X
 27     USC-44          OLD             X
327     USC-ECL         OLD             X
 32     SDAC-44         OLD             X
 37     CCA-TENEX       OLD             X
 40     PARC-MAXC       OLD             NEW     I1,3,6; O3
 43     UCSD-CC         OLD             NEW     I0(!), 3; O0, 3
 53     OFFICE-1        OLD             X
 54     MIT-MULTICS     NEW             NEW     NONE
 61     BBN-TENEXB      OLD             NEW     I1, 3, 6; O3











Dodds                                                           [Page 2]
^L
RFC 702          SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS    September 1974


KEY TO SERVER STATUS TABLE:

        X       NO SERVER AT THIS SOCKET

        I#      OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER
                    (SERVER SAYS "WILL #")

        O#      OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER
                    (SERVER SAYS "DO #")
                (# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL.  ALL OPTIONS
                IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE:
                        0       TRANSMIT-BINARY
                        1       ECHO
                        3       SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD
                        6       TIMING-MARK)


NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS TO
        SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION 0.










       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
       [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with    ]
       [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp.            11/99 ]



















Dodds                                                           [Page 3]
^L