summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc7144.txt
blob: 8929d67263967d64e42372c6c8579c17d964a7bf (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         F. Knight
Request for Comments: 7144                                        NetApp
Category: Standards Track                                 M. Chadalapaka
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                Microsoft
                                                              April 2014


            Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI)
                          SCSI Features Update

Abstract

   Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) is a SCSI
   transport protocol that maps the SCSI family of protocols onto
   TCP/IP.  The iSCSI protocol as specified in RFC 7143 (and as
   previously specified by the combination of RFC 3720 and RFC
   5048) is based on the SAM-2 (SCSI Architecture Model - 2)
   version of the SCSI family of protocols.  This document
   defines enhancements to the iSCSI protocol to support certain
   additional features of the SCSI protocol that were defined in
   SAM-3, SAM-4, and SAM-5.

   This document is a companion document to RFC 7143.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by
   the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further
   information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of
   RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any
   errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7144.













Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 1]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.





































Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 2]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


Table of Contents

   1. Introduction ....................................................4
   2. Definitions, Acronyms, and Document Summary .....................4
      2.1. Definitions ................................................4
      2.2. Acronyms ...................................................4
      2.3. New Semantics ..............................................4
   3. Terminology Mapping .............................................5
   4. New Feature Use .................................................7
      4.1. Negotiation of New Feature Use .............................7
      4.2. Impact on Standard INQUIRY Data - iSCSI Version
           Descriptors ................................................8
   5. SCSI Commands ...................................................9
      5.1. SCSI Command Additions .....................................9
           5.1.1. Command Priority (Byte 2) ..........................10
      5.2. SCSI Response Additions ...................................11
           5.2.1. Status Qualifier ...................................12
           5.2.2. Data Segment - Sense and Response Data Segment .....12
   6. Task Management Functions ......................................13
      6.1. Task Management Function Request PDU ......................13
      6.2. Existing Task Management Functions ........................14
      6.3. Task Management Function Additions ........................14
           6.3.1. LUN Field ..........................................15
           6.3.2. Referenced Task Tag ................................16
           6.3.3. RefCmdSN ...........................................16
      6.4. Task Management Function Responses ........................17
           6.4.1. Task Management Function Response PDU ..............17
           6.4.2. Task Management Function Response Additions ........18
      6.5. Task Management Requests Affecting Multiple Tasks .........19
   7. Login/Text Operational Text Keys ...............................19
      7.1. New Operational Text Keys .................................19
           7.1.1. iSCSIProtocolLevel .................................19
   8. Security Considerations ........................................20
   9. IANA Considerations ............................................21
   10. References ....................................................24
      10.1. Normative References .....................................24
      10.2. Informative References ...................................24
   11. Acknowledgements ..............................................24













Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 3]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


1.  Introduction

   The original iSCSI protocol [RFC3720] was built based on the [SAM2]
   model for SCSI.  Several new features and capabilities have been
   added to the SCSI Architecture Model in the intervening years (at the
   time of publication of this document, SAM-5 was the current version
   of the SCSI Architecture Model).  This document is not a complete
   revision of [RFC3720].  Instead, this document is intended as a
   companion document to RFC 7143; this document may also be used as a
   companion document to the combination of [RFC3720] and [RFC5048],
   although both of those RFCs have been obsoleted by [RFC7143].

   For more information on the SCSI Architecture Model and SCSI Primary
   Commands - 4, contact the INCITS T10 Technical Committee for SCSI
   Storage Interfaces at <http://www.t10.org>.

2.  Definitions, Acronyms, and Document Summary

2.1.  Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

2.2.  Acronyms

   ACA      Auto Contingent Allegiance
   AHS      Additional Header Segment
   ISID     Initiator Session Identifier
   LU       Logical Unit
   PDU      Protocol Data Unit
   SAM-5    SCSI Architecture Model - 5 (see [SAM5])
   TSIH     Target Session Identifying Handle

2.3.  New Semantics

   This document specifies new iSCSI semantics.  This section summarizes
   the contents of the document.

      Section 3:  The mapping of iSCSI objects to SAM-5 objects
                  The iSCSI node may contain both initiator and target
                  capabilities.

      Section 4:  New feature use
                  New features need negotiation for use.  The
                  negotiation may have an impact on standard INQUIRY
                  data.




Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 4]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


      Section 5:  New command operations
                  The PRI field for SCSI command priority has been added
                  to the SCSI Command PDU (see Section 5.1.1).  The
                  Status Qualifier field has been added to the SCSI
                  Response PDU (see Section 5.2.1).  Sense data may be
                  returned (via Autosense) for any SCSI status, not just
                  CHECK CONDITION (see Section 5.2.2).

      Section 6:  New task management functions
                  Four new task management functions (QUERY TASK, QUERY
                  TASK SET, I_T NEXUS RESET, and QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS
                  EVENT) have been added (see Section 6.3).  A new
                  "Function succeeded" response has been added (see
                  Section 6.4.2).

      Section 7:  New negotiation key
                  A new negotiation key has been added to enable the use
                  of the new features in Sections 5 and 6.

3.  Terminology Mapping

   The iSCSI model (defined in [RFC7143]) uses different terminology
   than the SCSI Architecture Model.  In some cases, iSCSI uses multiple
   terms to describe what in the SCSI Architecture Model is described
   with a single term.  The iSCSI terms and SAM-5 terms are not
   necessarily equivalent, but rather, the iSCSI terms represent
   examples of the objects or classes described in SAM-5 as follows:
























Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 5]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


       Terminology in RFC 7143     | Terminology in SAM-5
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | Network Entity              | none                      |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Node                  | SCSI Device               |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Name                  | SCSI Device Name          |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Node Name             | SCSI Device Name          |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Initiator Node        | SCSI Initiator Device     |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Initiator Name        | SCSI Device Name          |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Initiator Port        | SCSI Initiator Port       |
     | Identifier; (i.e., iSCSI    | Identifier                |
     | Node Name + ,,,i, + ISID)** |                           |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Initiator Port Name;  | SCSI Initiator Port Name  |
     | (i.e., iSCSI Node Name +    |                           |
     | ,,,i, + ISID)**             |                           |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Target Node           | SCSI Target Device        |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Target Name           | SCSI Device Name          |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Target Port           | SCSI Target Port          |
     | Identifier; (i.e., iSCSI    | Identifier                |
     | Node Name + ,,,t, +         |                           |
     | Target Portal Group Tag)**  |                           |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Target Port Name;     | SCSI Target Port Name     |
     | (i.e., iSCSI Node Name +    |                           |
     | ,,,t, + Target Portal       |                           |
     | Group Tag)**                |                           |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Target Portal Group   | SCSI Target Port          |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | iSCSI Initiator Name +      | I_T Nexus Identifier      |
     | ',i,' + ISID + iSCSI        |                           |
     | Target Name + ',t,' +       |                           |
     | Target Portal Group Tag     |                           |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+
     | Target Portal Group Tag     | Relative Port ID          |
     +-----------------------------+---------------------------+

   ** The text encoding of the ISID value and the Target Portal Group
      Tag value includes an initial ,,0X or ,,0x (see [RFC7143]).



Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 6]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   The following diagram shows an example of a combination target device
   and initiator device.  Such a configuration may exist in a target
   device that implements a SCSI Copy Manager.  This example shows how a
   session that shares Network Portals within a Portal Group may be
   established (see Target Portal Group 1).  In addition, this example
   shows the initiator using a different portal group than the target
   portal group, but the initiator portal group sharing Network Portal A
   with the target portal group.

     ----------------------------IP Network---------------------
             |               |                    |
        +----|---------------|-------+       +----|------------+
        | +----------+ +----------+  |       | +----------+    |
        | | Network  | | Network  |  |       | | Network  |    |
        | | Portal A | | Portal B |  |       | | Portal A |    |
        | +----------+ +----------+  |       | +----------+    |
        |    |    Target     |       |       |    | Initiator  |
        |    |    Portal     |       |       |    | Portal     |
        |    |    Group 1    |       |       |    | Group 2    |
        +----|---------------|-------+       +----|------------+
             |               |                    |
  +----------|---------------|--------------------|--------------------+
  | +--------|---------------|----+ +-------------|------------------+ |
  | |+-------|---------------|---+| |+------------|-----------------+| |
  | ||iSCSI Session (Target side)|| ||iSCSI Session (Initiator side)|| |
  | ||                           || ||                              || |
  | ||       (TSIH = 56)         || ||        (SSID = 48)           || |
  | |+---------------------------+| |+------------------------------+| |
  | |                             | |                                | |
  | |     iSCSI Target Node       | |      iSCSI Initiator Node      | |
  | +-----------------------------+ +--------------------------------+ |
  |                          iSCSI Node                                |
  |              (within Network Entity, not shown)                    |
  +--------------------------------------------------------------------+

4.  New Feature Use

4.1.  Negotiation of New Feature Use

   The iSCSIProtocolLevel operational text key (see Section 7.1.1)
   containing a value of "2" MUST be negotiated to enable the use of
   features described in this RFC.

   This is an iSCSI negotiation mechanism that enabled iSCSI support for
   corresponding SCSI capabilities (see [SAM5] and [SPC4]).  For this
   reason, negotiation of this key to a value of "2" is necessary but
   not sufficient for use of the SCSI capabilities enabled by the iSCSI
   features in this RFC.



Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 7]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   For example, an iSCSI implementation may negotiate this new key to
   "2" but respond to the new task management functions (see Section
   6.3) with "Task management function not supported" (which indicates a
   SCSI error that prevents the function from being performed).  In
   contrast, if the key is negotiated to "2", an iSCSI implementation
   MUST NOT reject a Task Management Function Request PDU that requests
   one of the new task management functions (as such a reject would
   report an iSCSI protocol error).

4.2.  Impact on Standard INQUIRY Data - iSCSI Version Descriptors

   The negotiated value of the iSCSIProtocolLevel key is an increment
   from the base iSCSI version descriptor value (0960h); see [SPC4].  If
   the SCSI device server returns an iSCSI version descriptor in the
   standard INQUIRY data, then the value returned in that iSCSI version
   descriptor MUST be set to the sum of the base value (0960h) plus the
   negotiated value of the iSCSIProtocolLevel key.  (For example, if the
   negotiated iSCSIProtocolLevel=2, then if an iSCSI version descriptor
   is returned in the standard INQUIRY data, it is set to 0962h.)

   In support of this functionality, INCITS Technical Committee T10,
   which is responsible for SCSI standards, has assigned SCSI version
   descriptor codes 0961h-097Fh to RFC 7144 for IANA to manage via the
   values 1-31 of the iSCSIProtocolLevel key; see Section 9.  The "No
   version claimed" description for the value 0 of the
   iSCSIProtocolLevel key corresponds to the existing T10 assignment of
   the 0960h SCSI version descriptor code to "iSCSI (no version
   claimed)" -- for this reason, the assignment of the value 0 in the
   IANA registry for the iSCSIProtocolLevel key must not be changed.






















Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 8]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


5.  SCSI Commands

5.1.  SCSI Command Additions

   The format of the SCSI Command PDU is:

   Byte/     0       |       1       |       2       |       3       |
      /              |               |               |               |
     |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    0|.|I| 0x01      |F|R|W|. .|ATTR | PRI   |  Reserved             |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength                             |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    8| Logical Unit Number (LUN)                                     |
     +                                                               +
   12|                                                               |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   16| Initiator Task Tag                                            |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   20| Expected Data Transfer Length                                 |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   24| CmdSN                                                         |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   28| ExpStatSN                                                     |
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   32/ SCSI Command Descriptor Block (CDB)                           /
    +/                                                               /
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   48/ AHS (Optional)                                                /
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    x/ Header Digest (Optional)                                      /
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    y/ (DataSegment, Command Data) (Optional)                        /
    +/                                                               /
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    z/ Data Digest (Optional)                                        /
     +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+

   The SCSI Command PDU above is duplicated from [RFC7143] for reference
   to show the PRI field.  For any field other than the PRI field, the
   text in [RFC7143] supersedes the text in Section 5.1 of this document
   in the event the two documents conflict.








Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                    [Page 9]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


5.1.1.  Command Priority (Byte 2)

   The Command Priority (PRI) is a four-bit field that specifies the
   relative scheduling importance of this command in relation to other
   commands already in the task set with SIMPLE task attributes (see
   [SAM5]).

   Section 11 ("iSCSI PDU Formats") of [RFC7143] requires that senders
   set this field to zero.  A sender MUST NOT set this field to a value
   other than zero unless the iSCSIProtocolLevel text key defined in
   Section 7.1.1 has been negotiated on the session with a value of "2".

   This field MUST be ignored by iSCSI targets unless the
   iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in Section
   7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.

   See [SAM5] for additional considerations on the use of the Command
   Priority field.

































Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 10]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


5.2.  SCSI Response Additions

   The format of the SCSI Response PDU is:

    Byte/     0       |       1       |       2       |       3       |
       /              |               |               |               |
      |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     0|.|.| 0x21      |1|. .|o|u|O|U|.| Response      | Status        |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength                             |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     8| Status Qualifier              | Reserved                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    12| Reserved                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    16| Initiator Task Tag                                            |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    20| SNACK Tag or Reserved                                         |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    24| StatSN                                                        |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    28| ExpCmdSN                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    32| MaxCmdSN                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    36| ExpDataSN or Reserved                                         |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    40| Bidirectional Read Residual Count or Reserved                 |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    44| Residual Count or Reserved                                    |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    48| Header-Digest (Optional)                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
      / Data Segment (Optional)                                       /
     +/                                                               /
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
      | Data-Digest (Optional)                                        |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+

   The SCSI Response PDU above is duplicated from [RFC7143] for
   reference to show the Status Qualifier field.  For any field other
   than the Status field, the Status Qualifier field, and the Data
   Segment - Sense and Response Data Segment field, the text in
   [RFC7143] supersedes the text in Section 5.2 of this document in the
   event the two documents conflict.





Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 11]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


5.2.1.  Status Qualifier

   The Status Qualifier provides additional status information (see
   [SAM5]).

   As defined in Section 11 ("iSCSI PDU Formats") of [RFC7143],
   compliant senders already set this field to zero.  Compliant senders
   MUST NOT set this field to a value other than zero unless the
   iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in Section
   7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.

   This field MUST be ignored by receivers unless the iSCSIProtocolLevel
   text key with a value of "2" as defined in Section 7.1.1 was
   negotiated on the session.

5.2.2.  Data Segment - Sense and Response Data Segment

   Section 11.4.7 of [RFC7143] specifies that iSCSI targets MUST support
   and enable Autosense.  If Status is CHECK CONDITION (0x02), then the
   Data Segment MUST contain sense data for the failed command.  While
   [RFC7143] does not make any statements about the state of the Data
   Segment when the Status is not CHECK CONDITION (0x02) (i.e., the Data
   Segment is not prohibited from containing sense data when the Status
   is not CHECK CONDITION), negotiation of the iSCSIProtocolLevel text
   key with a value of "2" as defined in Section 7.1.1 explicitly
   indicates that the Data Segment MAY contain sense data at any time,
   no matter what value is set in the Status field.
























Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 12]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


6.  Task Management Functions

6.1.  Task Management Function Request PDU

    Byte/     0       |       1       |       2       |       3       |
       /              |               |               |               |
      |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     0|.|I| 0x02      |1| Function    | Reserved                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength                             |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     8| Logical Unit Number (LUN)                                     |
      +                                                               +
    12|                                                               |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    16| Initiator Task Tag                                            |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    20| Referenced Task Tag or 0xffffffff                             |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    24| CmdSN                                                         |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    28| ExpStatSN                                                     |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    32| RefCmdSN or Reserved                                          |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    36| ExpDataSN or Reserved                                         |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    40| Reserved                                                      /
     +/                                                               /
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    48| Header-Digest (Optional)                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+

   The Task Management Function Request PDU above is duplicated from
   [RFC7143] for reference only.  [RFC7143] supersedes the text in
   Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of this document in the event the two documents
   conflict.













Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 13]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


6.2.  Existing Task Management Functions

   Section 11.5 of [RFC7143] defines the semantics used to request that
   SCSI task management functions be performed.  The following task
   management functions are defined:

      1   -   ABORT TASK
      2   -   ABORT TASK SET
      3   -   CLEAR ACA
      4   -   CLEAR TASK SET
      5   -   LOGICAL UNIT RESET
      6   -   TARGET WARM RESET
      7   -   TARGET COLD RESET
      8   -   TASK REASSIGN

6.3.  Task Management Function Additions

   Additional task management function codes are listed below.  For a
   more detailed description of SCSI task management, see [SAM5].

      9  - QUERY TASK - determine if the command identified by the
         Referenced Task Tag field is present in the task set.

      10 - QUERY TASK SET - determine if any command is present in the
         task set for the I_T_L Nexus on which the task management
         function was received.

      11 - I_T NEXUS RESET - perform an I_T nexus loss function (see
         [SAM5]) for the I_T nexus on which the task management function
         was received.

      12 - QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT - determine if there is a unit
         attention condition or a deferred error pending for the I_T_L
         nexus on which the task management function was received.

   These task management function requests MUST NOT be sent unless the
   iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in Section
   7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.

   Any compliant initiator that sends any of the new task management
   functions defined in this section MUST also support all new task
   management function responses (as specified in Section 6.4.2).

   For all of the task management functions detailed in this section,
   the Task Management Function Response MUST be returned as detailed in
   Section 6.4.





Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 14]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   The iSCSI target MUST ensure that no responses for the commands
   covered by a task management function are sent to the iSCSI initiator
   port after the Task Management response except for commands covered
   by a TASK REASSIGN, QUERY TASK, or QUERY TASK SET.

   If a QUERY TASK is issued for a task created by an immediate command,
   then RefCmdSN MUST be that of the Task Management request itself
   (i.e., CmdSN and RefCmdSN are equal); otherwise, RefCmdSN MUST be set
   to the CmdSN of the task to be queried (lower than CmdSN).

   If the connection is still active (it is not undergoing an implicit
   or explicit logout), QUERY TASK MUST be issued on the same connection
   to which the task to be queried is allegiant at the time the Task
   Management request is issued.  If the connection is implicitly or
   explicitly logged out (i.e., no other request will be issued on the
   failing connection and no other response will be received on the
   failing connection), then a QUERY TASK function request may be issued
   on another connection.  This Task Management request will then
   establish a new allegiance for the command being queried.

   At the target, a QUERY TASK function MUST NOT be executed on a Task
   Management request; such a request MUST result in Task Management
   response of "Function rejected".

   For the I_T NEXUS RESET function, the target device MUST respond to
   the function as defined in [SAM5].  Each logical unit accessible via
   the receiving I_T NEXUS MUST behave as dictated by the I_T nexus loss
   function in [SAM5] for the I_T nexus on which the task management
   function was received.  The target device MUST drop all connections
   in the session over which this function is received.  Independent of
   the DefaultTime2Wait and DefaultTime2Retain values applicable to the
   session over which this function is received, the target device MUST
   consider each participating connection in the session to have
   immediately timed out, leading to FREE state.  The resulting timeouts
   cause the session timeout event defined in [RFC7143], which in turn
   triggers the I_T nexus loss notification to the SCSI layer as
   described in [RFC7143].

6.3.1.  LUN Field

   This field is required for functions that address a specific LU
   (i.e., ABORT TASK, CLEAR TASK SET, ABORT TASK SET, CLEAR ACA, LOGICAL
   UNIT RESET, QUERY TASK, QUERY TASK SET, and QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT)
   and is reserved in all others.







Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 15]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


6.3.2.  Referenced Task Tag

   The Reference Task Tag is the Initiator Task Tag of the task to be
   aborted for the ABORT TASK function, reassigned for the TASK REASSIGN
   function, or queried for the QUERY TASK function.  For all other
   functions, this field MUST be set to the reserved value 0xffffffff.

6.3.3.  RefCmdSN

   If a QUERY TASK is issued for a task created by an immediate command
   then RefCmdSN MUST be that of the Task Management request itself
   (i.e., CmdSN and RefCmdSN are equal).

   For a QUERY TASK of a task created by non-immediate command RefCmdSN
   MUST be set to the CmdSN of the task identified by the Referenced
   Task Tag field.  Targets must use this field as described in section
   11.6.1 of [RFC7143] when the task identified by the Referenced Task
   Tag field is not in the task set.

































Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 16]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


6.4.  Task Management Function Responses

6.4.1.  Task Management Function Response PDU

    Byte/     0       |       1       |       2       |       3       |
       /              |               |               |               |
      |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     0|.|.| 0x22      |1| Reserved    | Response      | Reserved      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
     4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength                             |
      +-----------------------------------------------+---------------+
     8| Additional Response Information               | Reserved      |
      +-----------------------------------------------+---------------+
    12| Reserved                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    16| Initiator Task Tag                                            |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    20| Reserved                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    24| StatSN                                                        |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    28| ExpCmdSN                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    32| MaxCmdSN                                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    36/ Reserved                                                      /
     +/                                                               /
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
    48| Header-Digest (Optional)                                      |
      +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+

   Section 11.6 of [RFC7143] defines the semantics used for responses to
   SCSI task management functions.  The following responses are defined
   in [RFC7143]:

      0   - Function Complete
      1   - Task does not exist
      2   - LUN does not exist
      3   - Task still allegiant
      4   - Task allegiance reassignment not supported
      5   - Task management function not supported
      6   - Function authorization failed
      255 - Function rejected







Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 17]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   The Task Management Function Response PDU above and the list of task
   management function responses above are duplicated from [RFC7143] for
   reference only.  [RFC7143] supersedes the text in section 6.4.1 of
   this document in the event the two documents conflict.

   Responses to new task management functions (see Section 6.4.2) are
   listed below.  In addition, a new task Management response is listed
   below.  For a more detailed description of SCSI task management
   responses, see [SAM5].

   For the functions QUERY TASK, QUERY TASK SET, I_T NEXUS RESET, and
   QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT, the target performs the requested Task
   Management function and sends a Task Management response back to the
   initiator.

6.4.2.  Task Management Function Response Additions

   The new response is listed below:

         7 - Function succeeded

   In symbolic terms Response value 7 maps to the SCSI service response
   of FUNCTION SUCCEEDED in [SAM5].

   The Task Management Function Response of "Function succeeded" MUST be
   supported by an initiator that sends any of the new task management
   functions (see Section 6.3).

   For the QUERY TASK function, if the specified task is in the task
   set, then the logical unit returns a Response value of "Function
   succeeded", and additional response information is returned as
   specified in [SAM5].  If the specified task is not in the task set,
   then the logical unit returns a Response value of "Function
   complete".

   For the QUERY TASK SET function, if there is any command present in
   the task set from the specified I_T_L nexus, then the logical unit
   returns a Response value of "Function succeeded".  If there are no
   commands present in the task set from the specified I_T_L nexus, then
   the logical unit returns a Response value of "Function complete".

   For the I_T NEXUS RESET function, after completion of the events
   described in Section 6.3 for this function, the logical unit returns
   a Response value of "Function complete".  However, because the target
   drops all connections, the Service Response (defined by [SAM5]) for
   this SCSI task management function may not be reliably delivered to
   the issuing initiator port.




Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 18]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   For the QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT, if there is a unit attention
   condition or deferred error pending for the specified I_T_L nexus,
   then the logical unit returns a Response value of "Function
   succeeded", and additional response information is returned as
   specified in [SAM5].  If there is no unit attention or deferred error
   pending for the specified I_T_L nexus, then the logical unit returns
   a Response value of "Function complete".

6.5.  Task Management Requests Affecting Multiple Tasks

   Section 4.1 of [RFC5048] defines the notion of "affected tasks" in
   multi-task abort scenarios.  This section adds to the list included
   in that section by defining the tasks affected by the I_T NEXUS RESET
   function.

      I_T NEXUS RESET: All outstanding tasks received on the I_T nexus
         on which the function request was received for all logical
         units accessible to the I_T nexus.

   Sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 of [RFC5048] identify semantics for task
   management functions that involve multi-task abort operations.  If an
   iSCSI implementation supports the I_T NEXUS RESET function, it MUST
   also support the protocol behavior as defined in those sections and
   follow the sequence of actions as described in those sections when
   processing the I_T NEXUS RESET function.

7.  Login/Text Operational Text Keys

7.1.  New Operational Text Keys

7.1.1.  iSCSIProtocolLevel

   Use: LO, IO
   Irrelevant when: SessionType = Discovery
   Senders: Initiator and Target
   Scope: SW

   iSCSIProtocolLevel=<numerical-value-from-0-to-31>

   Default is 1.
   Result function is Minimum.

   This key is used to negotiate the use of iSCSI features that require
   different levels of protocol support (e.g., PDU formats, end-node
   semantics) for proper operation.






Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 19]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   Negotiation of the iSCSIProtocolLevel key to a value corresponding to
   an RFC indicates that both negotiating parties are compliant to the
   RFC in question and agree to support the corresponding PDU formats
   and semantics on that iSCSI session.  Features using this key are
   expected to be cumulative.

   An iSCSIProtocolLevel key negotiated to "0" indicates that the
   implementation does not claim a specific iSCSI protocol level.

   An iSCSIProtocolLevel key negotiated to "1" indicates that the
   implementation claims compliance with [RFC7143].

   An iSCSIProtocolLevel key negotiated to "2" is required to enable use
   of features defined in this RFC.

   If the negotiation answer is ignored by the acceptor, or the answer
   from the remote iSCSI end point is key=NotUnderstood, then the
   features defined in this RFC, and the features defined in any RFC
   requiring a key value greater than "2", MUST NOT be used.

8.  Security Considerations

   Command priorities are relative values, not absolute values (see
   [SAM5], and affect collections of commands, not necessarily
   individual commands (see [SAM5]).  If command priority is supported,
   it should be implemented in a fashion that avoids unwanted reduction
   or denial of service.

   All the iSCSI-related security text in [RFC3723] is directly
   applicable to this document.  The security text in [RFC7143] is
   directly applicable as well.




















Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 20]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


9.  IANA Considerations

   This document modifies or creates a number of iSCSI-related
   registries.

   The following iSCSI-related registries are modified.

   1. iSCSI Task Management Functions Codes

      Name of the existing registry: "iSCSI Task Management Function
      Codes"

      The following entries have been added:

         9  - QUERY TASK, RFC 7144

         10 - QUERY TASK SET, RFC 7144

         11 - I_T NEXUS RESET, RFC 7144

         12 - QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT, RFC 7144

         13-127 - Unassigned

   2. iSCSI Login/Text Keys

      Name of the existing registry: "iSCSI Login/Text Keys"

      Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value and its
      associated RFC reference.

      The following entry has been added:

         iSCSIProtocolLevel,  RFC 7144

   IANA has created the following iSCSI-related registries.

   3.  iSCSI Protocol Level

      Name of new registry: "iSCSI Protocol Level"

      Namespace details: Numerical values from 0 to 31

      Information that must be provided to assign a new value: An IESG-
      approved Standards Track specification defining the semantics and
      interoperability requirements of the proposed new value and the
      fields to be recorded in the registry.




Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 21]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


      Assignment policy:

      The assignments of these values must be coordinated with the
      INCITS T10 committee; therefore, review by an expert that
      maintains an association with that committee is required prior to
      IESG approval of the associated specification.  After creation of
      the registry, values are to be assigned sequentially (for example,
      any value greater than 4 will not be assigned until after the
      value 4 has been assigned).

      Special care must be taken in the assignment of new values in this
      registry.  Compatibility and interoperability will be adversely
      impacted if proper care is not exercised.  Features using this key
      are expected to be cumulative.  For example, since this document
      explicitly lists only value 2 for the features listed in this
      document, it is expected that a new RFC assigning value 3 will
      also have the features listed in this RFC, and therefore such an
      RFC is expected to either revise or replace this RFC.  Assignments
      that do not follow this policy should be reviewed and approved by
      the INCITS T10 committee.

      3-31: range available to IANA for assignment in this registry.

      Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value, description, and
      its associated RFC reference.

      The following entries have been added:

         Value  Description         Reference

          0     No version claimed  RFC 7144

          1     RFC 7143            [RFC7143]

          2     RFC 7144            RFC 7144

          3-31  Unassigned

      Allocation Policy: Expert Review and Standards Action [RFC5226]

   4.  iSCSI Task Management Function Response Codes

      Name of new registry: "iSCSI Task Management Function Response
      Codes"

      Namespace details: Numerical values that can fit in 8 bits.





Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 22]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


      Information that must be provided to assign a new value: An IESG-
      approved specification defining the semantics and interoperability
      requirements of the proposed new value and the fields to be
      recorded in the registry.

      Assignment policy:

      If the requested value is not already assigned, it may be assigned
      to the requester.

      8-254: Range available to IANA for assignment in this registry.

      Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value, Operation Name,
      and its associated RFC reference.

      The following entries have been added:

         0 - Function complete, [RFC7143]

         1 - Task does not exist, [RFC7143]

         2 - LUN does not exist, [RFC7143]

         3 - Task still allegiant, [RFC7143]

         4 - Task allegiance reassignment not supported, [RFC7143]

         5 - Task management function not supported, [RFC7143]

         6 - Function authorization failed, [RFC7143]

         7 - Function succeeded, RFC 7144

         8-254 - Unassigned

         255 - Function rejected, [RFC7143]

      Allocation Policy: Standards Action [RFC5226]













Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 23]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC3723]  Aboba, B., Tseng, J., Walker, J., Rangan, V., and F.
              Travostino, "Securing Block Storage Protocols over IP",
              RFC 3723, April 2004.

   [RFC5048]  Chadalapaka, M., Ed., "Internet Small Computer System
              Interface (iSCSI) Corrections and Clarifications", RFC
              5048, October 2007.

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008.

   [RFC7143]  Chadalapaka, M., Satran, J., Meth, K., and D. Black,
              "Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) Protocol
              (Consolidated)", RFC 7143, April 2014.

   [SAM2]     INCITS Technical Committee T10, "SCSI Architecture Model -
              2 (SAM-2)", ANSI INCITS 366-2003, ISO/IEC 14776-412, 2003.

   [SAM5]     INCITS Technical Committee T10, "SCSI Architecture Model -
              5 (SAM-5)", T10/BSR INCITS 515 rev 04, Committee Draft.

   [SPC4]     INCITS Technical Committee T10, "SCSI Primary Commands -
              4", ANSI INCITS 513-201x.

10.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3720]  Satran, J., Meth, K., Sapuntzakis, C., Chadalapaka, M.,
              and E. Zeidner, "Internet Small Computer Systems Interface
              (iSCSI)", RFC 3720, April 2004.

11.  Acknowledgements

   The Storage Maintenance (STORM) Working Group in the Transport Area
   of the IETF has been responsible for defining these additions to the
   iSCSI protocol (apart from other relevant IP Storage protocols).  The
   authors acknowledge the contributions of the entire working group and
   other IETF reviewers.






Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 24]
^L
RFC 7144               iSCSI SCSI Features Update             April 2014


   The following individuals directly contributed to identifying issues
   and/or suggesting resolutions to the issues clarified in this
   document: David Black, Rob Elliott.  This document benefited from all
   of these contributions.

Authors' Addresses

   Frederick Knight
   7301 Kit Creek Road
   P.O. Box 13917
   Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
   USA

   Phone: +1-919-476-5362
   EMail: knight@netapp.com


   Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
   Microsoft
   One Microsoft Way
   Redmond, WA 98052
   USA

   EMail: cbm@chadalapaka.com



























Knight & Chadalapaka         Standards Track                   [Page 25]
^L