summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc7953.txt
blob: 6348c230aa2b9aec4ef55f0fa1fc87ba4468665e (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          C. Daboo
Request for Comments: 7953                                         Apple
Updates: 4791, 5545, 6638                                    M. Douglass
Category: Standards Track                            Spherical Cow Group
ISSN: 2070-1721                                              August 2016


                         Calendar Availability

Abstract

   This document specifies a new iCalendar (RFC 5545) component that
   allows the publication of available and unavailable time periods
   associated with a calendar user.  This component can be used in
   standard iCalendar free-busy lookups, including the iCalendar
   Transport-independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP; RFC 5546)
   free-busy requests, to generate repeating blocks of available or busy
   time with exceptions as needed.

   This document also defines extensions to the Calendaring Extensions
   to WebDAV (CalDAV) calendar access protocol (RFC 4791) and the
   associated scheduling protocol (RFC 6638) to specify how this new
   calendar component can be used when evaluating free-busy time.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7953.














Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 1]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  iCalendar Extensions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  VAVAILABILITY Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Busy Time Type  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   4.  Combining VAVAILABILITY Components  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   5.  Calculating Free-Busy Time  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     5.1.  Examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   6.  Use with iTIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   7.  CalDAV Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     7.1.  CalDAV Requirements Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     7.2.  New Features in CalDAV  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   8.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
   9.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
   10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     10.1.  Component Registrations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     10.2.  Property Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
   11. Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
   Appendix A.  Example Calendar #1  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
   Appendix B.  Example Calendar #2  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24












Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 2]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


1.  Introduction

   Calendar users often have regular periods of time when they are
   either available to be scheduled or always unavailable.  For example,
   an office worker will often wish only to appear free to their work
   colleagues during normal 'office hours' (e.g., Monday through Friday,
   9 am through 5 pm).  Or, a university professor might only be
   available to students during a set period of time (e.g., Thursday
   afternoons, 2 pm through 5 pm during term time only).  Ideally, users
   ought be able to specify such periods directly via their calendar
   user agent and have them automatically considered as part of the
   normal free-busy lookup for that user.  In addition, it ought be
   possible to present different periods of available time depending on
   which user is making the request.

   iCalendar [RFC5545] defines a "VFREEBUSY" component that can be used
   to represent fixed busy time periods, but it does not provide a way
   to specify a repeating period of available or unavailable time.
   Since repeating patterns are often the case, "VFREEBUSY" components
   are not sufficient to solve this problem.

   This specification defines a new type of iCalendar component that can
   be used to publish user availability.

   CalDAV [RFC4791] provides a way for calendar users to access and
   manage calendar data and exchange this data via scheduling
   operations.  As part of this, the CalDAV calendar-access [RFC4791]
   feature provides a CALDAV:free-busy-query REPORT that returns free-
   busy information for a calendar collection or hierarchy of calendar
   collections.  Also, the CalDAV calendar-auto-schedule [RFC6638]
   feature allows free-busy information for a calendar user to be
   determined.  Both of these operations involve examining user
   calendars for events that 'block time', with the blocked out periods
   being returned in a "VFREEBUSY" component.

   This specification extends the CalDAV calendar-access and CalDAV
   calendar-auto-schedule features to allow the new iCalendar
   availability components to be stored and manipulated and to allow
   free-busy lookups to use the information from any such components, if
   present.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   [RFC2119].




Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 3]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   When XML element types in the namespaces "DAV:" and
   "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:caldav" are referenced in this document
   outside of the context of an XML fragment, the string "DAV:" and
   "CALDAV:" will be prefixed to the element type names respectively.

3.  iCalendar Extensions

   This specification adds a new "VAVAILABILITY" calendar component to
   iCalendar.  The "VAVAILABILITY" component is itself a container for
   new "AVAILABLE" subcomponents.

   The purpose of the "VAVAILABILITY" calendar component is to provide a
   grouping of available time information over a specific range of time.
   Within that, there are specific time ranges that are marked as
   available via a set of "AVAILABLE" calendar subcomponents.  Together
   these can be used to specify available time that can repeat over set
   periods of time, and which can vary over time.

   An illustration of how "VAVAILABILITY" and "AVAILABLE" components
   work is shown below.

                         Time Range
   <=========================================================>

      +-------------------------------------------------+
      |              VAVAILABILITY                      |
      +-------------------------------------------------+
         +------------+       +------------+
         | AVAILABLE  |       | AVAILABLE  |
         +------------+       +------------+

      <->              <----->              <-----------> Busy Time

   The overall time range is shown at the top.  A "VAVAILABILITY"
   component spans part of the range.  The time range covered by the
   "VAVAILABILITY" component is considered to be busy, except for the
   ranges covered by the "AVAILABLE" components within the
   "VAVAILABILITY" component.

3.1.  VAVAILABILITY Component

   Component Name:  VAVAILABILITY

   Purpose:  Provide a grouping of component properties and
      subcomponents that describe the availability associated with a
      calendar user.





Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 4]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   Format Definition:  A "VAVAILABILITY" calendar component is defined
      by the following notation:

   availabilityc  = "BEGIN" ":" "VAVAILABILITY" CRLF
                   availabilityprop *availablec
                   "END" ":" "VAVAILABILITY" CRLF

   availabilityprop  = *(
                    ;
                    ; the following are REQUIRED
                    ; but MUST NOT occur more than once
                    ;
                    dtstamp / uid
                    ;
                    ; the following are OPTIONAL
                    ; but MUST NOT occur more than once
                    ;
                    busytype / class / created / description /
                    dtstart / last-mod / location / organizer /
                    priority /seq / summary / url /
                    ;
                    ; Either 'dtend' or 'duration' MAY appear
                    ; in an 'availableprop', but 'dtend' and
                    ; 'duration' MUST NOT occur in the same
                    ; 'availabilityprop'.
                    ; 'duration' MUST NOT be present if
                    ; 'dtstart' is not present
                    ;
                    dtend / duration /
                    ;
                    ; the following are OPTIONAL
                    ; and MAY occur more than once
                    ;
                    categories / comment / contact /
                    x-prop / iana-prop
                    ;
                    )

   availablec  = "BEGIN" ":" "AVAILABLE" CRLF
                availableprop
                "END" ":" "AVAILABLE" CRLF










Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 5]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   availableprop  = *(
                 ;
                 ; the following are REQUIRED
                 ; but MUST NOT occur more than once
                 ;
                 dtstamp / dtstart / uid /
                 ;
                 ; Either 'dtend' or 'duration' MAY appear in
                 ; an 'availableprop', but 'dtend' and
                 ; 'duration' MUST NOT occur in the same
                 ; 'availableprop'.
                 ;
                 dtend / duration /
                 ;
                 ; the following are OPTIONAL
                 ; but MUST NOT occur more than once
                 ;
                 created / description / last-mod /
                 location / recurid / rrule / summary /
                 ;
                 ; the following are OPTIONAL
                 ; and MAY occur more than once
                 ;
                 categories / comment / contact / exdate /
                 rdate / x-prop / iana-prop
                 ;
                 )

   Description:  A "VAVAILABILITY" component indicates a period of time
      within which availability information is provided.  A
      "VAVAILABILITY" component can specify a start time and an end time
      or duration.  If "DTSTART" is not present, then the start time is
      unbounded.  If "DTEND" or "DURATION" are not present, then the end
      time is unbounded.  Within the specified time period, availability
      defaults to a free-busy type of "BUSY-UNAVAILABLE" (see
      Section 3.2), except for any time periods corresponding to
      "AVAILABLE" subcomponents.

      "AVAILABLE" subcomponents are used to indicate periods of free
      time within the time range of the enclosing "VAVAILABILITY"
      component.  "AVAILABLE" subcomponents MAY include recurrence
      properties to specify recurring periods of time, which can be
      overridden using normal iCalendar recurrence behavior (i.e., use
      of the "RECURRENCE-ID" property).







Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 6]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


      If specified, the "DTSTART" and "DTEND" properties in
      "VAVAILABILITY" components and "AVAILABLE" subcomponents MUST be
      "DATE-TIME" values specified as either the date with UTC time or
      the date with local time and a time zone reference.

      The iCalendar object containing the "VAVAILABILITY" component MUST
      contain appropriate "VTIMEZONE" components corresponding to each
      unique "TZID" parameter value used in any DATE-TIME properties in
      all components, unless [RFC7809] is in effect.

      When used to publish available time, the "ORGANIZER" property
      specifies the calendar user associated with the published
      available time.

      If the "PRIORITY" property is specified in "VAVAILABILITY"
      components, it is used to determine how that component is combined
      with other "VAVAILABILITY" components.  See Section 4.

      Other calendar properties MAY be specified in "VAVAILABILITY" or
      "AVAILABLE" components and are considered attributes of the marked
      block of time.  Their usage is application specific.  For example,
      the "LOCATION" property might be used to indicate that a person is
      available in one location for part of the week and a different
      location for another part of the week (but see Section 9 for when
      it is appropriate to add additional data like this).

   Example:  The following is an example of a "VAVAILABILITY" calendar
      component used to represent the availability of a user, always
      available Monday through Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm in the
      America/Montreal time zone:

   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:0428C7D2-688E-4D2E-AC52-CD112E2469DF
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:34EDA59B-6BB1-4E94-A66C-64999089C0AF
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T170000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY








Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 7]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


      The following is an example of a "VAVAILABILITY" calendar
      component used to represent the availability of a user available
      Monday through Thursday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm, at the main office,
      and Friday, 9:00 am to 12:00 pm, in the branch office in the
      America/Montreal time zone between October 2nd and December 2nd
      2011:

   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:84D0F948-7FC6-4C1D-BBF3-BA9827B424B5
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T000000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111202T000000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:7B33093A-7F98-4EED-B381-A5652530F04D
   SUMMARY:Monday to Thursday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T170000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH
   LOCATION:Main Office
   END:AVAILABLE
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:DF39DC9E-D8C3-492F-9101-0434E8FC1896
   SUMMARY:Friday from 9:00 to 12:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111006T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111006T120000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY
   LOCATION:Branch Office
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY

      The following is an example of three "VAVAILABILITY" calendar
      components used to represent the availability of a traveling
      worker: Monday through Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm each day.
      However, for three weeks the calendar user is working in Montreal,
      then one week in Denver, then back to Montreal.  Note that each
      overall period is covered by separate "VAVAILABILITY" components.
      The last of these has no DTEND so it continues on "forever".  This
      example shows one way "blocks" of available time can be
      represented.  See Section 4 for another approach using priorities.











Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 8]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:BE082249-7BDD-4FE0-BDBA-DE6598C32FC9
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T000000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111023T030000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:54602321-CEDB-4620-9099-757583263981
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T170000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   LOCATION:Montreal
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY
   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:A1FF55E3-555C-433A-8548-BF4864B5621E
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20111023T000000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20111030T000000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:57DD4AAF-3835-46B5-8A39-B3B253157F01
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20111023T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20111023T170000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   LOCATION:Denver
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY
   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:1852F9E1-E0AA-4572-B4C4-ED1680A4DA40
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111030T030000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:D27C421F-16C2-4ECB-8352-C45CA352C72A
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111030T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111030T170000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   LOCATION:Montreal
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY







Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                    [Page 9]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


3.2.  Busy Time Type

   Property Name:  BUSYTYPE

   Purpose:  This property specifies the default busy time type.

   Value Type:  TEXT

   Property Parameters:  IANA and nonstandard property parameters can be
      specified on this property.

   Conformance:  This property can be specified within "VAVAILABILITY"
      calendar components.

   Format Definition:  This property is defined by the following
      notation:

   busytype      = "BUSYTYPE" busytypeparam ":" busytypevalue CRLF

   busytypeparam = *(";" other-param)

   busytypevalue = "BUSY" / "BUSY-UNAVAILABLE" /
                   "BUSY-TENTATIVE" / iana-token / x-name
                  ; Default is "BUSY-UNAVAILABLE".

   Description:  This property is used to specify the default busy time
      type.  The values correspond to those used by the "FBTYPE"
      parameter used on a "FREEBUSY" property, with the exception that
      the "FREE" value is not used in this property.  If not specified
      on a component that allows this property, the default is "BUSY-
      UNAVAILABLE".

   Example:  The following is an example of this property:

   BUSYTYPE:BUSY

4.  Combining VAVAILABILITY Components

   The "VAVAILABILITY" component allows a calendar user to describe
   their availability over extended periods of time through the use of
   recurrence patterns.  This availability might be relatively constant
   from year to year.

   However, there is usually some degree of irregularity, as people take
   vacations or perhaps spend a few weeks at a different office.  For
   that period of time there is a need to redefine their availability.
   Rather than modify their existing availability, the "PRIORITY"
   property allows new "VAVAILABILITY" components to override others of



Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 10]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   lower ordinal priority.  Note that iCalendar [RFC5545] defines the
   "PRIORITY" property such that a value of 0 is undefined, 1 is the
   highest priority, and 9 is the lowest.

   When combining "VAVAILABILITY" components, an absence of a "PRIORITY"
   property or a value of 0 implies the lowest level of priority.  When
   two or more VAVAILABILITY components overlap, and they have the same
   PRIORITY value, the overlapping busy time type is determined by the
   following order: BUSY > BUSY-UNAVAILABLE > BUSY-TENTATIVE.  That is,
   if one component has a BUSYTYPE set to BUSY and the other has
   BUSYTYPE set to BUSY-UNAVAILABLE, then the effective busy time type
   over the time range that they overlap would be BUSY.  It is up to the
   creator of such components to ensure that combining them produces a
   consistent and expected result.

   To calculate the available time, order the intersecting
   "VAVAILABILITY" components by priority (the lowest to highest
   "PRIORITY" values are 0, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1).

   Step through the resulting list of "VAVAILABILITY" components.  For
   each, the time range covered by the "VAVAILABILITY" component is set
   to busy and then portions of it defined by the "AVAILABLE" components
   in the "VAVAILABILITY" component are set to free.

   Note that, if any "VAVAILABILITY" component completely covers the
   date range of interest, then any lower priority "VAVAILABILITY"
   components can be ignored.

   Typically, a calendar user's "default" availability (e.g., business
   hours of Monday through Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm) would use the
   lowest level of priority: zero.  Any overrides to the "default" would
   use higher levels as needed.  To avoid having to keep readjusting the
   "PRIORITY" property value when an override has to be "inserted"
   between two existing components, priority values SHOULD be "spaced
   out" over the full range of values.  The table below illustrates this
   via an example.  The first row shows the priority range from low to
   high, the second row shows the corresponding "PRIORITY" property
   value, and the third row shows which "VAVAILABILITY" component has
   that priority.  The "default" availability is created with priority
   zero (shown as {a} in the table), then the first override created
   with priority 5 (shown as {b} in the table), a subsequent
   availability can be inserted between the two by using priority 7
   (shown as {c} in the table), and another, taking precedence over all
   existing ones, with priority 3 (shown as {d} in the table).  As seen
   in the table, additional "slots" are open for more "VAVAILABILITY"
   components to be added with other priorities if needed.





Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 11]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


            +-----+----+----+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+------+
            | Low |    |    |     |    |     |    |     |    | High |
            +-----+----+----+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+------+
            |  0  | 9  | 8  |  7  | 6  |  5  | 4  |  3  | 2  |  1   |
            +-----+----+----+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+------+
            | {a} |    |    | {c} |    | {b} |    | {d} |    |      |
            +-----+----+----+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+------+

5.  Calculating Free-Busy Time

   This section describes how free-busy time information for a calendar
   user is calculated in the presence of "VAVAILABILITY" calendar
   components.

   An iCalendar "VFREEBUSY" component is used to convey "rolled-up"
   free-busy time information for a calendar user.  This can be
   generated as the result of an iTIP [RFC5546] free-busy request or
   through some other mechanism (e.g., a CalDAV calendar-access
   CALDAV:free-busy-query REPORT).

   When one or more "VAVAILABILITY" components are present and intersect
   the time range for the free-busy request, first the available time is
   calculated, as outlined in Section 4.  Once that is done, regular
   "VEVENT" and "VFREEBUSY" components can be "overlaid" in the usual
   way to block out time.

   An example procedure for this is as follows:

   1.  Initially mark the entire period of the free-busy request as
       free.

   2.  For each "VAVAILABILITY" component ordered by PRIORITY (lowest to
       highest):

       A.  Determine if the "VAVAILABILITY" intersects the time range of
           the free-busy request.  If not, ignore it.

       B.  Determine if the "VAVAILABILITY" is completely overridden by
           a higher priority component.  If so, ignore it.

       C.  For the time period covered by the "VAVAILABILITY" component,
           mark time in the free-busy request result set as busy, using
           the busy time type derived from the "BUSYTYPE" property in
           the "VAVAILABILITY" component.

       D.  Append the "VAVAILABILITY" component to a list of components
           for further processing in step 3, if it has not been ignored.




Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 12]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   3.  For each "VAVAILABILITY" component in the list resulting from
       step 2, in order from the first item to the last item:

       A.  For each "AVAILABLE" component in the "VAVAILABILITY"
           component:

           i.    Expand all recurring instances, taking into account
                 overridden instances, ignoring instances or parts of
                 instances that fall outside of the free-busy request
                 time range or the time period specified by the
                 "VAVAILABILITY" component.

           ii.   For each instance, mark the corresponding time in the
                 free-busy request result set as free.

   4.  For each "VEVENT" or "VFREEBUSY" component, apply normal free-
       busy processing within the free-busy request time range.

5.1.  Examples

   In the examples below, a table is used to represent time slots for
   the period of a free-busy request.  Each time slot is two hours long.
   The column header represents the hours from midnight local time.
   Each row below the column headers represents a step in the free-busy
   result set determination, following the procedure outlined above.

   Each cell in the rows below the column header contains a single
   character that represents the free-busy type for the corresponding
   time period at the end of the process step represented by the row.
   The characters in the row are:

   F  Represents "FREE" time in that slot.

   B  Represents "BUSY" time in that slot.

   U  Represents "BUSY-UNAVAILABLE" time in that slot.

   T  Represents "BUSY-TENTATIVE" time in that slot.

   I  Represents data to be ignored in that slot (as per step 2.B
      above).

5.1.1.  Simple Example

   Appendix A shows the user's calendar.  This includes one
   "VAVAILABILITY" component giving available time within the requested
   time range of 8:00 am to 6:00 pm, together with one "VEVENT"
   component representing a two hour meeting starting at 12:00 pm.



Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 13]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   A free-busy request for Monday, 6th November 2011, midnight to
   midnight in the America/Montreal time zone would be calculated as
   follows using the steps described above.

   +------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
   | Step | 0  | 2  | 4  | 6  | 8  | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 22 |
   +------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
   | 1.   | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  |
   | 2.   | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  |
   | 3.   | U  | U  | U  | U  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | U  | U  | U  |
   | 4.   | U  | U  | U  | U  | F  | F  | B  | F  | F  | U  | U  | U  |
   +------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+

5.1.2.  Further Example

   Appendix B shows another way to represent the availability of the
   traveling worker shown above.  Here we represent their base
   availability of Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 6:00 pm each day
   with a "VAVAILABILITY" with default "PRIORITY" (there is no "DTEND"
   property so that this availability is unbounded).  For the week the
   calendar user is working in Denver (October 23rd through October
   30th), we represent their availability with a "VAVAILABILITY"
   component with priority 1, which overrides the base availability.
   There is also a two hour meeting starting at 12:00 pm (in the
   America/Denver time zone).

   A free-busy request for Monday, 24th October 2011, midnight to
   midnight in the America/Montreal time zone, would be calculated as
   follows using the steps described above.  Note that there is a two
   hour offset in the in the available time, compared to the previous
   example, due to the two hour difference between the time zone of the
   free-busy request and the time zone of the user's availability and
   meeting. "2.P0" shows the base availability, and "2.P1" shows the
   higher priority availability. "3.P1" only shows the higher priority
   availability contributing to the overall free-busy since the default
   availability is ignored (as per step 2.B described above).

   +------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
   | Step | 0  | 2  | 4  | 6  | 8  | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 22 |
   +------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
   | 1.   | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  |
   | 2.P0 | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  | I  |
   | 2.P1 | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  |
   | 3.P1 | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | F  | F  | F  | F  | F  | U  | U  |
   | 4.   | U  | U  | U  | U  | U  | F  | F  | B  | F  | F  | U  | U  |
   +------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+





Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 14]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


6.  Use with iTIP

   This specification does not define how "VAVAILABILITY" components are
   used in scheduling messages sent using the iTIP [RFC5546] protocol.
   It is expected that future specifications will define how iTIP
   scheduling can make use of "VAVAILABILITY" components.

7.  CalDAV Extensions

7.1.  CalDAV Requirements Overview

   This section lists what functionality is required of a CalDAV server,
   which supports "VAVAILABILITY" components in stored calendar data.  A
   server:

   o  MUST advertise support for "VAVAILABILITY" components in
      CALDAV:supported-calendar-component-set properties on calendars
      that allow storing of such components;

   o  MUST support CALDAV:free-busy-query REPORTs that aggregate the
      information in any "VAVAILABILITY" components in the calendar
      collections targeted by the request;

   o  MUST support "VAVAILABILITY" components stored in a
      CALDAV:calendar-availability Web Distributed Authoring and
      Versioning (WebDAV) property on a CalDAV scheduling Inbox
      collection, if the CalDAV calendar-auto-schedule feature is
      supported;

   o  MUST support iTIP [RFC5546] free-busy requests that aggregate the
      information in any "VAVAILABILITY" components in calendar
      collections that contribute to free-busy, or in any
      "VAVAILABILITY" components stored in the CALDAV:calendar-
      availability property on the CalDAV scheduling Inbox collection of
      the calendar user targeted by the iTIP free-busy request, if the
      CalDAV calendar-auto-schedule feature is available.

   Processing of "VAVAILABILITY" components MUST conform to all the
   requirements CalDAV imposes on calendar object resources (see
   Section 4.1 of [RFC4791]).











Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 15]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


7.2.  New Features in CalDAV

7.2.1.  Calendar Availability Support

   A server supporting the features described in this document MUST
   include "calendar-availability" as a field in the DAV response header
   from an OPTIONS request.  A value of "calendar-availability" in the
   DAV response header indicates to clients that the server supports all
   the requirements specified in this document.

7.2.1.1.  Example: Using OPTIONS for the Discovery of Calendar
          Availability Support

   >> Request <<

   OPTIONS /home/bernard/calendars/ HTTP/1.1
   Host: cal.example.com

   >> Response <<

   HTTP/1.1 200 OK
   Allow: OPTIONS, GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, TRACE, COPY, MOVE
   Allow: PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, LOCK, UNLOCK, REPORT, ACL
   DAV: 1, 2, 3, access-control, calendar-access,
    calendar-availability
   Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:32:12 GMT
   Content-Length: 0

   In this example, the OPTIONS method returns the value "calendar-
   availability" in the DAV response header to indicate that the
   collection "/home/bernard/calendars/" supports the new features
   defined in this specification.

7.2.2.  CalDAV Time Range Queries

   Section 9.9 of [RFC4791] describes how to specify time ranges to
   limit the set of calendar components returned by the server.  This
   specification extends [RFC4791] to describe how to apply time range
   filtering to "VAVAILABILITY" components.

   A "VAVAILABILITY" component is said to overlap a given time range if
   the condition for the corresponding component state specified in the
   table below is satisfied.  The conditions depend on the presence of
   the "DTSTART", "DTEND", and "DURATION" properties in the
   "VAVAILABILITY" component.  Note that, as specified above, the
   "DTEND" value MUST be a "DATE-TIME" value equal to or after the
   "DTSTART" value, if specified.




Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 16]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


       +------------------------------------------------------------+
       | VAVAILABILITY has the DTSTART property?                    |
       |   +--------------------------------------------------------+
       |   | VAVAILABILITY has the DTEND property?                  |
       |   |   +----------------------------------------------------+
       |   |   | VAVAILABILITY has the DURATION property?           |
       |   |   |   +------------------------------------------------+
       |   |   |   | Condition to evaluate                          |
       +---+---+---+------------------------------------------------+
       | Y | Y | N | (start < DTEND  AND  end > DTSTART)            |
       +---+---+---+------------------------------------------------+
       | Y | N | Y | (start < DTSTART+DURATION  AND  end > DTSTART) |
       +---+---+---+------------------------------------------------+
       | Y | N | N | (end > DTSTART)                                |
       +---+---+---+------------------------------------------------+
       | N | Y | N | (start < DTEND)                                |
       +---+---+---+------------------------------------------------+
       | N | N | * | TRUE                                           |
       +---+---+---+------------------------------------------------+

7.2.3.  CALDAV:free-busy-query REPORT

   A CALDAV:free-busy-query REPORT can be executed on a calendar
   collection that contains iCalendar "VAVAILABILITY" components.  When
   that occurs, the server MUST aggregate the information in any
   "VAVAILABILITY" components when generating the free-busy response, as
   described in Section 5.

7.2.4.  CALDAV:calendar-availability Property

   Name:  calendar-availability

   Namespace:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:caldav

   Purpose:  Defines a "VAVAILABILITY" component that will be used in
      calculating free-busy time when an iTIP free-busy request is
      targeted at the calendar user who owns the Inbox.

   Conformance:  This property MAY be protected and SHOULD NOT be
      returned by a PROPFIND DAV:allprop request.  Support for this
      property is REQUIRED.  The value of this property MUST be a valid
      iCalendar object containing only one "VAVAILABILITY" component,
      and optionally, "VTIMEZONE" components - other iCalendar
      components MUST NOT be present.  "VTIMEZONE" components SHOULD NOT
      be present if [RFC7809] is in effect.  For more complex
      availability scenarios, clients can store multiple "VAVAILABILITY"
      components in the calendar user's calendar collections.




Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 17]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   Description:  This property allows a user to specify their
      availability by including an "VAVAILABILITY" component in the
      value of this property.  If present, the server MUST use this
      "VAVAILABILITY" component when determining free-busy information
      as part of an iTIP free-busy request being handled by the server.

   Definition:

   <!ELEMENT calendar-availability (#PCDATA) >
   ; Data value MUST be an iCalendar object containing
   ; "VAVAILABILITY" or "VTIMEZONE" components.

   Example:

   <C:calendar-availability xmlns:D="DAV:"
   xmlns:C="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:caldav"
   >BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
   PRODID:-//example.com//iCalendar 2.0//EN
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   UID:9BADC1F6-0FC4-44BF-AC3D-993BEC8C962A
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T000000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:6C9F69C3-BDA8-424E-B2CB-7012E796DDF7
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 18:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T090000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T180000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY
   END:VCALENDAR
   </C:calendar-availability>

7.2.5.  iTIP Free-Busy Requests

   The CalDAV calendar-auto-schedule feature (see Section 5 of
   [RFC6638]) includes a mechanism for free-busy information to be
   requested via the CalDAV protocol.  Any "VAVAILABILITY" components in
   any calendar collections targeted during such a request MUST be
   included as part of the calculation of the overall free-busy
   information.  In addition, the "VAVAILABILITY" component specified in
   the CALDAV:calendar-availability property on the owner's Inbox MUST
   also be included in the free-busy calculation.  Processing of all
   such "VAVAILABILITY" components is done as per Section 5.





Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 18]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


8.  Security Considerations

   Calculation of availability information, particularly with multiple
   overlapping time ranges, can be complex, and CalDAV servers MUST
   limit the complexity of such data stored by a client.

   An attacker able to "inject" availability information into a calendar
   user's calendar data could ensure that the user never appears free
   for meetings or appears free at inappropriate times.  Calendar
   systems MUST ensure that availability information for a calendar user
   can only be modified by authorized users.

   Security considerations in [RFC5545], [RFC5546], [RFC4791],
   [RFC6638], and [RFC7809] MUST also be adhered to.

9.  Privacy Considerations

   Free-busy and availability information can be used by attackers to
   infer the whereabouts or overall level of "activity" of the
   corresponding calendar user.  Any calendar system that allows a user
   to expose their free-busy and availability information MUST limit
   access to that information to only authorized users.

   When "VAVAILABILITY" components are sent to or shared with other
   calendar users, care has to be taken not to expose more information
   than is needed by each recipient.  For example, a business owner will
   likely not want their customers to know where they might be or what
   they might be doing, but family members might be willing to expose
   such information to each other.  Thus, calendaring systems allowing
   "VAVAILABILITY" components to be sent or shared to other calendar
   users MUST provide a way for nonessential properties to be removed
   (e.g., "SUMMARY", "LOCATION", and "DESCRIPTION").

   iCalendar "VFREEBUSY" information generated from "VAVAILABILITY"
   components MUST NOT include information other than busy or free time
   periods.  In particular, user specified property values such as
   "SUMMARY", "LOCATION", and "DESCRIPTION" MUST NOT be copied into the
   free-busy result data.

   Privacy considerations in [RFC5545], [RFC5546], [RFC4791], [RFC6638],
   and [RFC7809] MUST also be adhered to.










Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 19]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


10.  IANA Considerations

10.1.  Component Registrations

   This document defines the following new iCalendar components, which
   have been added to the registry defined in Section 8.3.1 of
   [RFC5545]:

           +---------------+---------+------------------------+
           | Component     | Status  | Reference              |
           +---------------+---------+------------------------+
           | VAVAILABILITY | Current | RFC 7953, Section 3.1  |
           | AVAILABLE     | Current | RFC 7953, Section 3.1  |
           +---------------+---------+------------------------+

10.2.  Property Registrations

   This documents defines the following new iCalendar properties, which
   have been added to the registry defined in Section 8.3.2 of
   [RFC5545]:

              +----------+---------+------------------------+
              | Property | Status  | Reference              |
              +----------+---------+------------------------+
              | BUSYTYPE | Current | RFC 7953, Section 3.2  |
              +----------+---------+------------------------+

11.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4791]  Daboo, C., Desruisseaux, B., and L. Dusseault,
              "Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)", RFC 4791,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4791, March 2007,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4791>.

   [RFC5545]  Desruisseaux, B., Ed., "Internet Calendaring and
              Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)",
              RFC 5545, DOI 10.17487/RFC5545, September 2009,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5545>.

   [RFC5546]  Daboo, C., Ed., "iCalendar Transport-Independent
              Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)", RFC 5546,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5546, December 2009,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5546>.



Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 20]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


   [RFC6638]  Daboo, C. and B. Desruisseaux, "Scheduling Extensions to
              CalDAV", RFC 6638, DOI 10.17487/RFC6638, June 2012,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6638>.

   [RFC7809]  Daboo, C., "Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV):
              Time Zones by Reference", RFC 7809, DOI 10.17487/RFC7809,
              March 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7809>.












































Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 21]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


Appendix A.  Example Calendar #1

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
   PRODID:-//example.com//iCalendar 2.0//EN
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   DTSTAMP:20111113T044111Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111106T120000
   DURATION:PT2H
   SUMMARY:Meeting
   UID:768CB0C2-8642-43F7-A6C4-F8BB04B829B4
   END:VEVENT
   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   UID:452DFCA7-3203-4A3D-9A9A-99753A383B41
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T000000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:466D5C68-5C4A-4078-AF5D-9C55EA9145D7
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 8:00 to 18:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T080000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T180000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY
   END:VCALENDAR

























Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 22]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


Appendix B.  Example Calendar #2

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
   PRODID:-//example.com//iCalendar 2.0//EN
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   DTSTAMP:20111113T044111Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20111106T120000
   DURATION:PT2H
   SUMMARY:Lunch meeting in Denver
   UID:2346C09A-42BF-439E-916C-FC83AF869171
   END:VEVENT
   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:627A87FA-E5F1-43C0-B3B1-567DA10F2A83
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T000000
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:A833E850-892B-43F6-98B6-C15A6BFC5D27
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T080000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20111002T180000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   LOCATION:Montreal
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY
   BEGIN:VAVAILABILITY
   ORGANIZER:mailto:bernard@example.com
   UID:F01411E3-38B8-4490-8A1F-0CCEC57A0943
   DTSTAMP:20111005T133225Z
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20111023T000000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20111030T000000
   PRIORITY:1
   BEGIN:AVAILABLE
   UID:A35AA091-3846-48ED-96F6-881E8A0D0A93
   SUMMARY:Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00
   DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20111023T080000
   DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20111023T180000
   RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR
   LOCATION:Denver
   END:AVAILABLE
   END:VAVAILABILITY
   END:VCALENDAR







Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 23]
^L
RFC 7953                  Calendar Availability              August 2016


Acknowledgements

   Thanks to the following for providing feedback: Toby Considine,
   Bernard Desruisseaux, Alexey Melnikov, Daniel Migault, Ken Murchison,
   Evert Pot, and Dave Thewlis.  This specification came about via
   discussions at the Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium.

Authors' Addresses

   Cyrus Daboo
   Apple Inc.
   1 Infinite Loop
   Cupertino, CA  95014
   United States of America

   Email: cyrus@daboo.name
   URI:   http://www.apple.com/


   Michael Douglass
   Spherical Cow Group
   226 3rd Street
   Troy, NY  12180
   United States of America

   Email: mdouglass@sphericalcowgroup.com
   URI:   http://sphericalcowgroup.com
























Daboo & Douglass             Standards Track                   [Page 24]
^L