1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
|
Internet Architecture Board (IAB) R. Housley
Request for Comments: 8090 Vigil Security
Category: Informational February 2017
ISSN: 2070-1721
Appointment Procedures for the IETF Representatives to the
Community Coordination Group (CCG)
Abstract
This document outlines the procedures by which the IETF makes
appointments to the Community Coordination Group (CCG), which
provides advice and guidance to the IETF Trust in matters related to
the IANA trademarks and the IANA domain names.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to
provide for permanent record. It represents the consensus of the
Internet Architecture Board (IAB). Documents approved for
publication by the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8090.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document.
Housley Informational [Page 1]
^L
RFC 8090 CCG Representative Procedures February 2017
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................... 2
2. Desirable Qualifications for CCG Representatives ............... 3
3. CCG Representative Selection Procedures ........................ 3
3.1. Duration of Appointment ................................... 3
3.2. Nominations and Eligibility ............................... 3
3.3. Selection ................................................. 4
4. CCG Representative Removal Procedures .......................... 4
5. CCG Representative Co-Chair Selection Procedures ............... 5
6. Initial Appointments ........................................... 5
7. Reporting by the CCG Representatives to the IAB ................ 5
8. IANA Considerations ............................................ 6
9. Security Considerations ........................................ 6
10. Informative References ........................................ 6
IAB Members at the Time of Approval ............................... 6
Acknowledgements .................................................. 7
Author's Address .................................................. 7
1. Introduction
The "IANA IPR Community Agreement" [1] was one of the many documents
that was part of the IANA Stewardship Transition. It calls for the
creation of the Community Coordination Group (CCG) to provide
guidance and advice to the IETF Trust regarding the stewardship of
the IANA Intellectual Property, which is the IANA trademarks and the
IANA domain names.
The CCG is comprised of nine individuals, called the CCG
Representatives. The three operational communities (i.e., the Names
Community, the Numbers Community, and the Protocol Parameters
Community) each appoint three CCG Representatives. Each operational
community has the right to change any of its CCG Representatives upon
written notice to the other operational communities and the IETF
Trust. An operational community may remove or replace its CCG
Representatives at any time and at its sole discretion. The means
and procedures by which an operational community chooses to select,
appoint, and remove its own CCG Representatives are determined solely
by that operational community.
Each operational community appoints one of its CCG Representatives as
a co-chair of the CCG, and that co-chair is empowered to speak on
behalf of its operational community regarding the IANA Intellectual
Property. An operational community has the right to change its CCG
co-chair upon written notice to the other operational communities and
the IETF Trust. An operational community may remove or replace its
CCG co-chair at any time and at its sole discretion.
Housley Informational [Page 2]
^L
RFC 8090 CCG Representative Procedures February 2017
This document outlines the procedures for the IETF to select,
appoint, and remove the three CCG Representatives for the Protocol
Parameter Community. In addition, this document outlines the
procedures for the selection of the co-chair among those CCG
Representatives.
2. Desirable Qualifications for CCG Representatives
Candidates for the CCG Representative position for the Protocol
Parameters Community should have a demonstrable involvement in the
IETF and a solid understanding of the various ways that the IETF
makes use of protocol parameter registries. Candidates should be
familiar with the ways that the IETF community depends upon the IANA
trademarks and the IANA domain names.
Candidates are expected to be able to call on others in the IETF
community, as required, to ensure that the IETF Trust receives the
highest quality advice available.
Candidates are expected to possess clearly demonstrated technical
competence relating to the management of IANA protocol parameter
registries. Candidates are also expected to be able to understand
the ways that IANA registries are used by the Names Community and the
Numbers Community.
3. CCG Representative Selection Procedures
The three CCG Representatives for the Protocol Parameters Community
serve at the pleasure of the IAB.
3.1. Duration of Appointment
Each of the CCG Representatives is expected to serve for at least a
year, and appointments ought to be staggered to avoid simultaneous
replacement of all of the CCG Representatives at the same time. Each
year the IAB will seek input from the IETF community to determine
whether a personnel change is appropriate.
3.2. Nominations and Eligibility
When the IAB decides to appoint a new person as a CCG Representative,
the IAB will make a public call for nominations on the
ietf-announce@ietf.org mailing list. The public call will specify
the manner by which nominations will be accepted and the means by
which the list of nominees will be published for IETF community
feedback. Self-nominations are permitted.
Housley Informational [Page 3]
^L
RFC 8090 CCG Representative Procedures February 2017
Each nomination must include the name and contact information for
each candidate. The details about the candidate's background and
qualifications for the position should be provided with the
nomination. Trustees of the IETF Trust are not eligible for
nomination. All other IETF participants, including working group
chairs, IETF NomCom members, IAB members, and IESG members are
eligible for nomination.
IAB members who accept a nomination shall recuse themselves from
selection discussions.
3.3. Selection
The IAB will publish the list of people that have accepted their
nomination or have nominated themselves. Feedback from the IETF
community will be considered by the IAB in making a selection. The
IAB will keep any received feedback confidential.
The IAB will consider potential conflicts with a CCG Representative
position and any other positions held by the nominated candidates.
After considering the IETF community feedback, potential conflicts,
and any other appropriate information that is available, the IAB
shall vote to select the best qualified CCG Representative.
4. CCG Representative Removal Procedures
If there are concerns with the performance of an IAB-appointed CCG
Representative, the IETF community can request that the IAB consider
removal. Such a request must be sent by email to iab-chair@iab.org.
The request must include a statement of justification for the removal
of the CCG Representative, including all relevant and appropriate
supporting documentation.
The IAB shall respond to the request within six weeks. If an IAB
member is serving in any of the CCG Representative positions,
regardless of the operational community that the IAB member
represents, that IAB member shall be recused from any investigation,
discussion, and vote to determine what action to take.
If the CCG Representative is removed, then the open position is to be
filled according to Section 3 of this document.
Housley Informational [Page 4]
^L
RFC 8090 CCG Representative Procedures February 2017
5. CCG Representative Co-Chair Selection Procedures
Whenever there is a change to the list of people that are serving as
CCG Representatives for the Protocol Parameters Community, the
sitting CCG Representatives shall use a procedure of their own
choosing to select the co-chair. The co-chair selection shall be
confirmed by the IAB, and then the IAB shall announce the co-chair
selection to the IETF community, the IETF Trust, and the CCG
Representatives from the other operational communities.
At any time, for any reason, the list of people that are serving as
CCG Representatives for the Protocol Parameters Community may revisit
the selection of co-chair. If a different selection is made, the new
selection shall be confirmed by the IAB, and then the IAB shall
announce the co-chair selection to the IETF community, the IETF
Trust, and the CCG Representatives from the other operational
communities.
As part of the confirmation process, the IAB shall consider potential
conflicts of interest of the candidate for co-chair.
6. Initial Appointments
Since three CCG Representatives needed to be in place at midnight on
30 September 2016 when the IANA Stewardship Transition took place,
the IAB quickly appointed three individuals that were heavily
involved in the transition. The three individuals agreed to serve
until the appointment procedures could be adopted and employed.
Using the procedures in this document, the IAB will appoint three CCG
Representatives before the second IETF meeting in 2017.
To encourage the staggered replacement, at least one of those
appointed will be replaced before the second IETF meeting in 2018,
that is, one year after the first set of CCG Representatives are
appointed by the process in this document.
7. Reporting by the CCG Representatives to the IAB
CCG Representatives shall deliver reports to the IAB within a
reasonable time frame, providing whenever possible the opportunity to
obtain advice regarding open IANA Intellectual Property issues.
While no specific time periods for reporting are mandated, CCG
Representatives are expected to keep the IAB informed of CCG
activities.
Housley Informational [Page 5]
^L
RFC 8090 CCG Representative Procedures February 2017
Reports from the CCG Representatives will be made publicly available,
except for comments about individuals. These reports will typically
be part of the minutes of the IAB meeting where they are discussed.
8. IANA Considerations
This document does not require any IANA actions.
9. Security Considerations
This document does not describe any technical protocols and has no
implications for network security.
10. Informative References
[1] IETF Trust, "IANA IPR Community Agreement", 21 September 2016,
<https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/
Community-Agreement-09-21-2016clean.pdf>.
IAB Members at the Time of Approval
The IAB members at the time this memo was approved were (in
alphabetical order):
Jari Arkko
Ralph Droms
Ted Hardie
Joe Hildebrand
Russ Housley
Lee Howard
Erik Nordmark
Robert Sparks
Andrew Sullivan
Dave Thaler
Martin Thomson
Brian Trammell
Suzanne Woolf
Housley Informational [Page 6]
^L
RFC 8090 CCG Representative Procedures February 2017
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Ted Hardie, Alissa Cooper, Brian Carpenter, Andrew
Sullivan, Dave Crocker, John Klensin, Dave Thaler, and Martin Thomson
for the valuable review and comments.
Author's Address
Russ Housley
918 Spring Knoll Drive
Herndon, VA 20170
USA
Email: housley@vigilsec.com
Housley Informational [Page 7]
^L
|