1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Gondwana, Ed.
Request for Comments: 9042 Fastmail
Updates: 5228 June 2021
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721
Sieve Email Filtering: Delivery by MAILBOXID
Abstract
The OBJECTID capability of IMAP (RFC 8474) allows clients to identify
mailboxes by a unique identifier that survives renaming.
This document extends the Sieve email filtering language (RFC 5228)
to allow using that same unique identifier as a target for fileinto
rules and for testing the existence of mailboxes.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9042.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Conventions Used in This Document
3. Sieve Capability String
4. Argument :mailboxid to Command fileinto
4.1. Interaction with Mailbox Extension
4.2. Interaction with Special-Use Extension
5. Interaction with FCC Extension
6. Test mailboxidexists
7. Interaction with Variables Extension
8. Security Considerations
9. IANA Considerations
10. References
10.1. Normative References
10.2. Informative References
Acknowledgements
Author's Address
1. Introduction
Sieve rules [RFC5228] are sometimes created using graphical
interfaces, which allow users to select the mailbox to be used as a
target for a rule.
If that mailbox is renamed, the client may also update its internal
representation of the rule and update the Sieve script to match;
however, this is a multistep process and subject to partial failures.
Also, if the folder is renamed by a different mechanism (e.g.,
another IMAP client), the rules will get out of sync.
By telling fileinto to reference the immutable MAILBOXID specified by
[RFC8474], using the extension specified herein, Sieve rules can
continue to target the same mailbox, even if it gets renamed.
2. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
3. Sieve Capability String
Scripts that use the extensions defined in this document MUST
explicitly require the capability "mailboxid".
Example:
require "mailboxid";
4. Argument :mailboxid to Command fileinto
Normally, the fileinto command delivers the message in the mailbox
specified using its positional mailbox argument. However, if the
optional :mailboxid argument is also specified, the fileinto command
first checks whether a mailbox exists in the user's personal
namespace [RFC2342] with the specified MAILBOXID [RFC8474].
If a matching mailbox is found, that mailbox is used for delivery.
If there is no such mailbox, the fileinto action proceeds as it would
without the :mailboxid argument.
The tagged argument :mailboxid to fileinto consumes one additional
token, a string containing the OBJECTID of the target mailbox.
Example:
require "fileinto";
require "mailboxid";
if header :contains ["from"] "coyote" {
fileinto :mailboxid "F6352ae03-b7f5-463c-896f-d8b48ee3"
"INBOX.harassment";
}
4.1. Interaction with Mailbox Extension
For servers that also support the mailbox extension defined in
[RFC5490], if both the :create and :mailboxid arguments are provided
to a fileinto command and no matching mailbox is found, then a new
mailbox will be created.
This new mailbox will have the name specified by the positional
mailbox argument ([RFC5228], Section 4.1); however, it will get a
different MAILBOXID (chosen by the server) rather than the one
specified by the :mailboxid argument to fileinto.
Example:
require "fileinto";
require "mailboxid";
require "mailbox";
fileinto :mailboxid "Fnosuch"
:create
"INBOX.no-such-folder";
# creates INBOX.no-such-folder, but it doesn't
# get the "Fnosuch" mailboxid.
4.2. Interaction with Special-Use Extension
For servers that also support delivery to special-use mailboxes
[RFC8579], it is an error to specify both :mailboxid and :specialuse
in the same fileinto command.
Advanced filtering based on both special-use and MAILBOXID can be
built with explicit specialuse_exists and mailboxidexists tests.
| Note to developers of Sieve generation tools:
|
| It is advisable to use special-use rather than MAILBOXID when
| creating rules that are based on a special-use purpose (e.g.,
| delivery directly to the Junk folder based on a header that was
| added by a scanning agent earlier in the mail flow).
5. Interaction with FCC Extension
This document extends the definition of the :fcc argument defined in
[RFC8580] so that it can optionally be used with the :mailboxid
argument. The syntax for FCC is extended here using ABNF [RFC5234]:
MAILBOXID-OPT = ":mailboxid" objectid
FCC-OPTS =/ MAILBOXID-OPT
If the optional :mailboxid argument is specified with :fcc, it
instructs the Sieve interpreter to check whether a mailbox exists
with the specific MAILBOXID. If such a mailbox exists, the generated
message is filed into that mailbox. Otherwise, the generated message
is filed into the :fcc target mailbox.
As with fileinto, it is an error to specify both :mailboxid and
:specialuse for the same fcc rule.
Example:
require ["enotify", "fcc", "mailboxid"];
notify :fcc "INBOX.Sent"
:mailboxid "F6352ae03-b7f5-463c-896f-d8b48ee3"
:message "You got mail!"
"mailto:ken@example.com";
6. Test mailboxidexists
Usage: mailboxidexists <mailbox-objectids: string-list>
The mailboxidexists test is true if every string argument provided is
the MAILBOXID of a mailbox that exists in the mailstore and that
allows the user in whose context the Sieve script runs to deliver
messages into it.
When the mailstore is an IMAP server that also supports IMAP Access
Control List (ACL) [RFC4314], delivery is allowed if the user has the
'p' or 'i' rights for the mailbox (see Section 5.2 of [RFC4314]).
When the mailstore is an IMAP server that does not support IMAP ACL,
delivery is allowed if the READ-WRITE response code is present for
the mailbox when selected by the user (see Section 7.1 of [RFC3501]).
Note that a successful mailboxidexists test for a mailbox doesn't
necessarily mean that a "fileinto :mailboxid" action on this mailbox
would succeed. For example, the fileinto action might put the user
over quota. The mailboxidexists test only verifies existence of the
mailbox and whether the user in whose context the Sieve script runs
has permissions to execute fileinto on it.
Example:
require "fileinto";
require "mailboxid";
if header :contains ["from"] "coyote" {
if mailboxidexists "F6352ae03-b7f5-463c-896f-d8b48ee3" {
fileinto :mailboxid "F6352ae03-b7f5-463c-896f-d8b48ee3"
"INBOX.name.will.not.be.used";
} else {
fileinto "INBOX.harassment";
}
}
| Note to implementers:
|
| This test behaves identically to the mailboxexists test defined
| in [RFC5490] but operates on MAILBOXIDs rather than mailbox
| names.
7. Interaction with Variables Extension
There is no special interaction defined; however, as an OBJECTID is a
string in this document, OBJECTID values can contain variable
expansions if [RFC5229] is enabled.
8. Security Considerations
Because MAILBOXID is always generated by the server, implementations
MUST NOT allow Sieve to make an end run around this protection by
creating mailboxes with the specified ID by using :create and
:mailboxid in a fileinto rule for a nonexistent mailbox.
Implementers are referred to the Security Considerations sections of
[RFC5228] and [RFC8474].
9. IANA Considerations
IANA has added the following capability to the "Sieve Extensions"
registry at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-extensions>:
Capability name: mailboxid
Description: adds a test for checking mailbox existence by OBJECTID
and new optional arguments to fileinto and :fcc that allow
selecting the destination mailbox by OBJECTID.
RFC number: RFC 9042
Contact address: EXTRA discussion list <extra@ietf.org>
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2342] Gahrns, M. and C. Newman, "IMAP4 Namespace", RFC 2342,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2342, May 1998,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2342>.
[RFC5228] Guenther, P., Ed. and T. Showalter, Ed., "Sieve: An Email
Filtering Language", RFC 5228, DOI 10.17487/RFC5228,
January 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5228>.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8474] Gondwana, B., Ed., "IMAP Extension for Object
Identifiers", RFC 8474, DOI 10.17487/RFC8474, September
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8474>.
[RFC8580] Murchison, K. and B. Gondwana, "Sieve Extension: File
Carbon Copy (FCC)", RFC 8580, DOI 10.17487/RFC8580, May
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8580>.
10.2. Informative References
[RFC3501] Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION
4rev1", RFC 3501, DOI 10.17487/RFC3501, March 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3501>.
[RFC4314] Melnikov, A., "IMAP4 Access Control List (ACL) Extension",
RFC 4314, DOI 10.17487/RFC4314, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4314>.
[RFC5229] Homme, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Variables Extension",
RFC 5229, DOI 10.17487/RFC5229, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5229>.
[RFC5490] Melnikov, A., "The Sieve Mail-Filtering Language --
Extensions for Checking Mailbox Status and Accessing
Mailbox Metadata", RFC 5490, DOI 10.17487/RFC5490, March
2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5490>.
[RFC8579] Bosch, S., "Sieve Email Filtering: Delivering to Special-
Use Mailboxes", RFC 8579, DOI 10.17487/RFC8579, May 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8579>.
Acknowledgements
This document borrows heavily from [RFC5490] for the matching
mailboxexists test and from [RFC8579] for an example of modifying the
fileinto command.
Thanks to Ned Freed, Ken Murchison, and Alexey Melnikov for feedback
on the EXTRA mailing list.
Author's Address
Bron Gondwana (editor)
Fastmail
Level 2
114 William St
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
Email: brong@fastmailteam.com
URI: https://www.fastmail.com
|