summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc9167.txt
blob: 96e57ec2d3ce367e7fd9418353e0eade9c9bd731 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        T. Sattler
Request for Comments: 9167                                              
Category: Standards Track                                      R. Carney
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                J. Kolker
                                                            GoDaddy Inc.
                                                           December 2021


   Registry Maintenance Notification for the Extensible Provisioning
                             Protocol (EPP)

Abstract

   This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
   extension called "Registry Maintenance Notification", which is used
   by EPP servers to notify EPP clients and allow EPP clients to query
   EPP servers regarding maintenance events.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9167.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
   Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
   in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
     1.1.  Terminology and Definitions
   2.  Migrating to Newer Versions of This Extension
   3.  Object Attributes
     3.1.  Internationalized Domain Names
     3.2.  Dates and Times
     3.3.  Maintenance Elements
   4.  EPP Command Mapping
     4.1.  EPP Query Commands
       4.1.1.  EPP <info> Command
       4.1.2.  EPP <poll> Command
     4.2.  EPP Transform Commands
   5.  Formal Syntax
     5.1.  Registry Maintenance Notification EPP Mapping Schema
   6.  IANA Considerations
     6.1.  XML Namespace
     6.2.  EPP Extension Registry
   7.  Security Considerations
   8.  References
     8.1.  Normative References
     8.2.  Informative References
   Acknowledgments
   Authors' Addresses

1.  Introduction

   The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP), as defined in [RFC5730],
   is a protocol whose original motivation is to provide a standard
   Internet domain name registration protocol for use between registries
   and registrars.

   Registries routinely update systems to ensure a higher quality of
   service, implement new services, or upgrade protocols to the latest
   standards.  These updates are pushed to various registry environments
   during time frames communicated to registrars as "maintenance
   events".  Maintenance events may require making services unavailable
   for some limited time while the upgrade happens.  Registries usually
   inform registrars about maintenance events in various formats, none
   of which are standardized between registries.

   The DNS namespace expansion has led to many additional registries
   that registrars must interact with, adding more maintenance events
   and formats.  It is now desirable to provide an efficient approach to
   notify registrars.

   This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the
   EPP to provide a mechanism by which EPP servers may notify EPP
   clients of and allow EPP clients to query EPP servers on upcoming
   maintenance events.

1.1.  Terminology and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

   XML [W3C.REC-xml-20081126] is case sensitive.  Unless stated
   otherwise, XML specifications and examples provided in this document
   MUST be interpreted in the character case presented in order to
   develop a conforming implementation.

   The XML namespace prefix "maint" is used for the namespace
   "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0", but implementations
   MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML
   parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents.

   "ote" is an abbreviation for "Operational Test and Evaluation".

   In examples, "C:" represents lines sent by a protocol client, and
   "S:" represents lines returned by a protocol server.  Indentation and
   white space in examples are provided only to illustrate element
   relationships and are not a required feature of this protocol.

2.  Migrating to Newer Versions of This Extension

   Servers that implement this extension SHOULD provide a way for
   clients to progressively update their implementations when a new
   version of the extension is deployed.  A newer version of the
   extension is expected to use an XML namespace with a higher version
   number than the prior versions.

   Servers SHOULD (for a temporary migration period up to server policy)
   provide support for older versions of the extension in parallel to
   the newest version and allow clients to execute their preferred
   version of the <info> command based on the maintenance <objURI>
   elements of the server <greeting>.  The version of the maintenance
   <info> response MUST match the version of the maintenance <info>
   command executed by the server.

   Servers MUST return a Registry Maintenance Notification poll message
   matching the newest negotiated version of the maintenance extension,
   based on an intersection of the maintenance <objURI> elements in the
   server <greeting> and the client <login> command.  If the
   intersection of the maintenance <objURI> elements of the server
   <greeting> and the client <login> command results in an empty set,
   the server MUST return the newest version of the Registry Maintenance
   Notification poll message supported by the server based on "Usage
   with Poll-Message EPP Responses" in Section 6 of [RFC9038].

3.  Object Attributes

3.1.  Internationalized Domain Names

   Names of affected hosts MUST be provided in A-label form, according
   to [RFC5891].

3.2.  Dates and Times

   All date and time attribute values MUST be expressed in Universal
   Coordinated Time (UTC) using the Gregorian calendar.  The date-time
   format defined as "date-time" in [RFC3339], with time-offset="Z",
   MUST be used.

3.3.  Maintenance Elements

   The <maint:item> element describes a single registry maintenance
   event during a specific period.  This element is used in a
   maintenance item EPP <info> command and response as well as in a
   <poll> response.

   If an element is not marked as optional, it is mandatory.

   <maint:id>
      The server-unique identifier for the maintenance event with the
      OPTIONAL "name" attribute that includes a human-readable name of
      the event.  The server-unique identifier SHALL NOT be changed if
      the event is updated or deleted.  When the "name" attribute is
      set, the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute, per the language structure in
      [RFC5646], MAY be present to identify the language if the
      negotiated value is something other than the default value of "en"
      (English).

   <maint:type>
      Zero or more OPTIONAL types of the maintenance event, with the
      possible set of values defined by server policy, such as "Routine
      Maintenance", "Software Update", "Software Upgrade", or "Extended
      Outage".  The OPTIONAL "lang" attribute MAY be present to identify
      the language if the negotiated value is something other than the
      default value of "en" (English).

   <maint:pollType>
      The OPTIONAL <maint:pollType> element for a Registry Maintenance
      Notification poll message; values MUST be "create", "update",
      "delete", "courtesy", or "end".  For the "create" and "update"
      types, the server includes the state of the maintenance event
      after the creation or update.  For the "delete" type, the server
      includes the state of the event before the delete.  The "courtesy"
      provides a reminder of an event, and the "end" provides a
      notification of the end of the event without updating the
      maintenance object and includes the latest state of the event.
      This element MUST be present only for poll messages.

   <maint:systems>
      One or more <maint:system> elements that are affected by the
      maintenance event.

      <maint:system>
         The <maint:system> element contains the following child
         elements:

         <maint:name>
            The name of the affected system, such as "EPP", "WHOIS",
            "DNS", "Portal", "RDAP", etc.

         <maint:host>
            The OPTIONAL affected maintained system's hostname, which
            SHALL be in A-label form, according to [RFC5891].

         <maint:impact>
            The impact level; the values MUST be "full", "partial", or
            "none".  If access is expected to be intermittently
            unavailable, it is "partial".  If access is expected to be
            completely unavailable, it is "full".  If access is not
            affected, it is "none".

   <maint:environment>
      The type of the affected system; the attribute "type" is REQUIRED
      and MUST be "production", "ote", "staging", "dev", or "custom".
      For extensibility, the <maint:environment> element includes the
      OPTIONAL "name" attribute that can define the name of the custom
      environment when the <maint:environment> element "type" attribute
      has the "custom" value.  For example, for the custom "marketing"
      environment, the <maint:environment> element should be:
      <maint:environment type="custom" name="marketing"/>.

   <maint:start>
      The date and time of the start of the maintenance event.

   <maint:end>
      The date and time of the end of the maintenance event.  The
      <maint:end> element MUST be greater than the <maint:start>
      element.

   <maint:reason>
      The reason behind the maintenance event; the values MUST be either
      "planned" or "emergency".

   <maint:detail>
      The OPTIONAL URI to the detailed maintenance event description,
      formatted according to [RFC3986].

   <maint:description>
      Zero or more OPTIONAL free-form descriptions of the maintenance
      event, usable without creating and traversing an external resource
      as defined by the <maint:detail> element.  The OPTIONAL "lang"
      attribute MAY be present to identify the language if the
      negotiated value is something other than the default value of "en"
      (English).  The OPTIONAL "type" attribute MAY be present to
      identify the format of the description.  It MUST be either "plain"
      for plain text or "html" for HTML text, as defined in [HTML5], and
      XML-escaped, with a default value of "plain".

   <maint:tlds>
      The OPTIONAL <maint:tlds> element contains one or more <maint:tld>
      child elements.  If the <maint:tlds> is not present, the entire
      system is affected.

      <maint:tld>
         The affected top-level domain or registry zone, which SHALL be
         in A-label form, according to [RFC5891].

  
      <maint:intervention>
         The OPTIONAL <maint:intervention> element contains the
         following child elements:

         <maint:connection>
            The value SHALL be boolean and indicates if a client needs
            to perform a connection-related action such as a reconnect.
            The attribute should only be used as a flag to indicate
            connections will be affected.  Servers SHOULD include a
            description of how the connections are affected in the
            <maint:description> element or use the <maint:detail>
            element above.

         <maint:implementation>
            The value SHALL be boolean and indicates if a client needs
            to perform an implementation-related action such as a code
            change.  The attribute should only be used as a flag to
            indicate implementation will be affected.  Servers SHOULD
            include a description of how the implementation is affected
            in the <maint:description> element or use the <maint:detail>
            element above.

      <maint:crDate>
         The date and time of the maintenance object creation.

      <maint:upDate>
         The OPTIONAL date and time of the most recent maintenance
         object modification.  This element MUST NOT be present if the
         maintenance object has never been modified.

4.  EPP Command Mapping

   A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found
   in the EPP core protocol specification [RFC5730].  The command
   mappings described here are specifically used to notify registrars of
   registry maintenance events and object mapping.

4.1.  EPP Query Commands

   EPP [RFC5730] provides three commands to retrieve object information:
   <check> to determine if an object is known to the server, <info> to
   retrieve detailed information associated with an object, and
   <transfer> to retrieve object transfer status information.

   This extension does not add any elements to EPP <check> and
   <transfer> commands or responses.

4.1.1.  EPP <info> Command

   EPP provides the <info> command that is used to retrieve registry
   maintenance information.  In addition to the standard EPP command
   elements, the <info> command MUST contain a <maint:info> element that
   identifies the maintenance namespace.

   The <maint:info> element MUST contain a child element.  It is either
   the <maint:id> child element, described in Section 4.1.1.1, to query
   for a specific maintenance item or the <maint:list> child element,
   described in Section 4.1.1.2, to query all maintenance items.

4.1.1.1.  Info Maintenance Item

   The information regarding a specific maintenance item can be
   retrieved by using the <info> command with the <maint:info> element
   and the <maint:id> child element, defined in Section 3.3.  If the
   maintenance identifier does not exist, the server MUST return an EPP
   error result code of 2303 ("Object does not exist") [RFC5730].

   The following is an example of retrieving a specific maintenance item
   in an <info> command.

   C:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   C:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   C:  <command>
   C:    <info>
   C:      <maint:info
   C:        xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0">
   C:        <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6</maint:id>
   C:      </maint:info>
   C:    </info>
   C:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   C:  </command>
   C:</epp>

   When an <info> command has been processed successfully, the EPP
   <resData> element MUST contain a child <maint:infData> element that
   identifies the maintenance namespace.  The <maint:infData> element
   contains the <maint:item> element defined in Section 3.3.

   The following is an example of returning a specific maintenance item
   in an <info> response.

   S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   S:   <response>
   S:      <result code="1000">
   S:         <msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
   S:      </result>
   S:      <resData>
   S:        <maint:infData
   S:          xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0">
   S:          <maint:item>
   S:            <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6
   S:            </maint:id>
   S:            <maint:type lang="en">Routine Maintenance</maint:type>
   S:            <maint:systems>
   S:              <maint:system>
   S:                <maint:name>EPP</maint:name>
   S:                <maint:host>epp.registry.example
   S:                </maint:host>
   S:                <maint:impact>full</maint:impact>
   S:              </maint:system>
   S:            </maint:systems>
   S:            <maint:environment type="production"/>
   S:            <maint:start>2021-12-30T06:00:00Z</maint:start>
   S:            <maint:end>2021-12-30T07:00:00Z</maint:end>
   S:            <maint:reason>planned</maint:reason>
   S:            <maint:detail>
   S:              https://www.registry.example/notice?123
   S:            </maint:detail>
   S:            <maint:description lang="en">free-text
   S:            </maint:description>
   S:            <maint:description lang="de">Freitext
   S:            </maint:description>
   S:            <maint:tlds>
   S:              <maint:tld>example</maint:tld>
   S:              <maint:tld>test</maint:tld>
   S:            </maint:tlds>
   S:            <maint:intervention>
   S:              <maint:connection>false</maint:connection>
   S:              <maint:implementation>false</maint:implementation>
   S:            </maint:intervention>
   S:            <maint:crDate>2021-11-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:          </maint:item>
   S:        </maint:infData>
   S:      </resData>
   S:      <trID>
   S:         <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   S:         <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
   S:      </trID>
   S:   </response>
   S:</epp>

4.1.1.2.  Info Maintenance List

   The information for a list of maintenance items can be retrieved by
   using the <info> command with the <maint:info> element and the empty
   <maint:list> child element.  Server policy determines if completed
   maintenance events will be included in the list of maintenance items.

   The following is an example of retrieving the list of maintenance
   items in an <info> command.

   C:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   C:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   C:  <command>
   C:    <info>
   C:      <maint:info
   C:        xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0">
   C:        <maint:list/>
   C:      </maint:info>
   C:    </info>
   C:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   C:  </command>
   C:</epp>

   When an <info> command has been processed successfully, the EPP
   <resData> element MUST contain a child <maint:infData> element that
   identifies the maintenance namespace.  The <maint:infData> element
   contains the <maint:list> element with zero or more <maint:listItem>
   child elements.  The <maint:listItem> element contains the following
   child elements:

      <maint:id>
         The <maint:id> element defined in Section 3.3.

      <maint:start>
         The <maint:start> element defined in Section 3.3.

      <maint:end>
         The <maint:end> element defined in Section 3.3.

      <maint:crDate>
         The <maint:crDate> element defined in Section 3.3.

      <maint:upDate>
         The OPTIONAL <maint:upDate> element defined in Section 3.3.

   The following is an example of returning the list of maintenance
   items in an <info> response.

   S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   S:   <response>
   S:      <result code="1000">
   S:         <msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
   S:      </result>
   S:      <resData>
   S:        <maint:infData
   S:          xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0">
   S:          <maint:list>
   S:            <maint:listItem>
   S:              <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6
   S:              </maint:id>
   S:              <maint:start>2021-12-30T06:00:00Z</maint:start>
   S:              <maint:end>2021-12-30T07:00:00Z</maint:end>
   S:              <maint:crDate>2021-11-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:            </maint:listItem>
   S:            <maint:listItem>
   S:              <maint:id>91e9dabf-c4e9-4c19-a56c-78e3e89c2e2f
   S:              </maint:id>
   S:              <maint:start>2021-12-15T04:30:00Z</maint:start>
   S:              <maint:end>2021-12-15T05:30:00Z</maint:end>
   S:              <maint:crDate>2021-11-08T22:11:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:              <maint:upDate>2021-11-17T15:00:00Z</maint:upDate>
   S:            </maint:listItem>
   S:          </maint:list>
   S:        </maint:infData>
   S:      </resData>
   S:      <trID>
   S:         <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   S:         <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
   S:      </trID>
   S:   </response>
   S:</epp>

4.1.2.  EPP <poll> Command

   The EPP <poll> command and response are defined in Section 2.9.2.3 of
   [RFC5730].  The Registry Maintenance Notification is included in the
   EPP <poll> response in [RFC5730].

   There are five types of poll messages for the Registry Maintenance
   Notification, defined by the <maint:pollType> element in Section 3.3.
   A poll message might be generated when a maintenance event is
   created, updated, or deleted.  A courtesy poll message can be sent as
   a reminder of an upcoming maintenance event.  An end poll message can
   be sent when the maintenance event is completed.  In the case of a
   message specific to Registry Maintenance, a <maint:infData> element
   that identifies the maintenance namespace will be included within the
   <resData> element of the standard <poll> response.  The
   <maint:infData> element contains the <maint:item> element defined in
   Section 3.3.

   The following is an example of a <poll> command:

   C:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   C:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   C:  <command>
   C:    <poll op="req"/>
   C:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   C:  </command>
   C:</epp>

   Example <poll> response:

   S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   S:  <response>
   S:    <result code="1301">
   S:      <msg>Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
   S:    </result>
   S:  <msgQ count="1" id="12345">
   S:    <qDate>2021-11-08T22:10:00Z</qDate>
   S:    <msg lang="en">Registry Maintenance Notification</msg>
   S:  </msgQ>
   S:  <resData>
   S:    <maint:infData
   S:      xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0">
   S:      <maint:item>
   S:        <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6</maint:id>
   S:        <maint:pollType>create</maint:pollType>
   S:        <maint:systems>
   S:          <maint:system>
   S:            <maint:name>EPP</maint:name>
   S:            <maint:host>epp.registry.example
   S:            </maint:host>
   S:            <maint:impact>full</maint:impact>
   S:          </maint:system>
   S:        </maint:systems>
   S:        <maint:environment type="production"/>
   S:        <maint:start>2021-12-30T06:00:00Z</maint:start>
   S:        <maint:end>2021-12-30T07:00:00Z</maint:end>
   S:        <maint:reason>planned</maint:reason>
   S:        <maint:detail>
   S:          https://www.registry.example/notice?123
   S:        </maint:detail>
   S:        <maint:tlds>
   S:          <maint:tld>example</maint:tld>
   S:          <maint:tld>test</maint:tld>
   S:        </maint:tlds>
   S:        <maint:intervention>
   S:          <maint:connection>false</maint:connection>
   S:          <maint:implementation>false</maint:implementation>
   S:        </maint:intervention>
   S:        <maint:crDate>2021-11-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:      </maint:item>
   S:    </maint:infData>
   S:  </resData>
   S:  <trID>
   S:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   S:    <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
   S:  </trID>
   S:  </response>
   S:</epp>

4.2.  EPP Transform Commands

   EPP provides five commands to transform objects: <create> to create
   an instance of an object, <delete> to delete an instance of an
   object, <renew> to extend the validity period of an object,
   <transfer> to manage object sponsorship changes, and <update> to
   change information associated with an object.

   This extension does not add any elements to the EPP <create>,
   <delete>, <renew>, <transfer>, and <update> commands.

5.  Formal Syntax

   The EPP Registry Maintenance Notification schema is presented here.

   The formal syntax is a complete schema representation of the object
   mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML instances.  The
   <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS> tags are not part of the schema; they
   are used to note the beginning and end of the schema for URI
   registration purposes.

5.1.  Registry Maintenance Notification EPP Mapping Schema

   <CODE BEGINS>
   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
     <schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:
       maintenance-1.0"
       xmlns:eppcom="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0"
       xmlns:epp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0"
       xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0"
       xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
       elementFormDefault="qualified">
     <!--
     Import common element types
     -->
     <import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0"/>
     <import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0"/>
     <annotation>
       <documentation>
         Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0
         Registry Maintenance Notification Mapping Schema.
       </documentation>
     </annotation>
     <!--
     Child elements found in EPP commands.
     -->
     <element name="info" type="maint:infoType"/>
     <!--
      Child elements of the <info> command.
     -->
     <complexType name="infoType">
       <sequence>
         <choice>
           <element name="list"/>
           <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         </choice>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
     Human-readable text may describe the maintenance
     -->
     <complexType name="idType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="token">
           <attribute name="name" type="token"/>
           <attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Info Response element
     -->
     <element name="infData" type="maint:infDataType"/>
     <!--
      <info> response elements.
     -->
     <complexType name="infDataType">
       <choice>
         <element name="list" type="maint:listDataType"/>
         <element name="item" type="maint:maintDataType"/>
       </choice>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Attributes associated with the list info response
     -->
     <complexType name="listDataType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="listItem" type="maint:maintItemType"
          minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Attributes associated with the list item info response
     -->
     <complexType name="maintItemType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         <element name="start" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="end" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="crDate" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="upDate" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Attributes associated with the maintenance info response
     -->
     <complexType name="maintDataType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         <element name="type" type="maint:typeType" minOccurs="0"
          maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
         <element name="pollType" type="maint:pollType" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="systems" type="maint:systemsType"/>
         <element name="environment" type="maint:envType"/>
         <element name="start" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="end" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="reason" type="maint:reasonEnum"/>
         <element name="detail" type="anyURI" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="description" type="maint:descriptionType"
          minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
         <element name="tlds" type="maint:tldsType" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="intervention" type="maint:interventionType"
          minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="crDate" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="upDate" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      systems element
     -->
     <complexType name="systemsType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="system" type="maint:systemType"
          maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Enumerated list of poll types
     -->
     <simpleType name="pollType">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="create"/>
         <enumeration value="update"/>
         <enumeration value="delete"/>
         <enumeration value="courtesy"/>
         <enumeration value="end"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>
     <!--
      Enumerated list of impacts
     -->
     <simpleType name="impactEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="none"/>
         <enumeration value="partial"/>
         <enumeration value="full"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>
     <!--
      description element
     -->
     <complexType name="descriptionType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="string">
           <attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/>
           <attribute name="type" type="maint:descEnum" default="plain"
           />
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Enumerated list of description mime types
     -->
     <simpleType name="descEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="plain"/>
         <enumeration value="html"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>
     <!--
      type element
     -->
     <complexType name="typeType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="string">
           <attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      system element
     -->
     <complexType name="systemType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="name" type="token"/>
         <element name="host" type="eppcom:labelType" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="impact" type="maint:impactEnum"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Enumerated list of environments
     -->
     <simpleType name="envEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="production"/>
         <enumeration value="ote"/>
         <enumeration value="staging"/>
         <enumeration value="dev"/>
         <enumeration value="custom"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>
     <!--
      environment element
     -->
     <complexType name="envType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="token">
           <attribute name="type" type="maint:envEnum" use="required"/>
           <attribute name="name" type="token" use="optional"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      Enumerated list of reasons
     -->
     <simpleType name="reasonEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="planned"/>
         <enumeration value="emergency"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>
     <!--
      tlds element
     -->
     <complexType name="tldsType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="tld" type="eppcom:labelType"
          maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      intervention element
     -->
     <complexType name="interventionType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="connection" type="boolean"/>
         <element name="implementation" type="boolean"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
      End of schema.
     -->
     </schema>
   <CODE ENDS>

6.  IANA Considerations

6.1.  XML Namespace

   This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas
   conforming to a registry mechanism defined in [RFC3688].

   The following entry has been registered as an XML namespace:

   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0
   Registrant Contact:  IESG
   XML:  None.  Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.

   The following entry has been registered to the XML maintenance
   schema:

   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:maintenance-1.0
   Registrant Contact:  IESG
   XML:  See the "Formal Syntax" section of this document.

6.2.  EPP Extension Registry

   The following entry has been added to the "Extensions for the
   Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" registry, described in
   [RFC7451]:

   Name of Extension:  Registry Maintenance Notification for the
      Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
   Document status:  Standards Track
   Reference:  RFC 9167
   Registrant Name and Email Address:  IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
   TLDs:  Any
   IPR Disclosure:  None
   Status:  Active
   Notes:  None

7.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations of [RFC5730] apply in this document.
   Additionally, a server MUST only provide maintenance information to
   clients that are authorized.  Suppose a client queries a maintenance
   identifier that it is not authorized to access per Section 4.1.1.1,
   "Info Maintenance Item".  In that case, the server SHOULD return an
   EPP error result code of 2201 ("Authorization error") or 2303
   ("Object does not exist") [RFC5730].  The list of top-level domains
   or registry zones returned in the "Info Maintenance Item" response
   SHOULD be filtered based on the top-level domains or registry zones
   for which the client is authorized.  Authorization of poll messages
   is done at the time of poll message insertion and not at the time of
   poll message consumption.

8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [HTML5]    WHATWG, "HTML - Living Standard", December 2021,
              <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3339]  Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet:
              Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.

   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
              RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.

   [RFC5646]  Phillips, A., Ed. and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying
              Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646,
              September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>.

   [RFC5730]  Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)",
              STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5730>.

   [RFC5891]  Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names in
              Applications (IDNA): Protocol", RFC 5891,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5891, August 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5891>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC9038]  Gould, J. and M. Casanova, "Extensible Provisioning
              Protocol (EPP) Unhandled Namespaces", RFC 9038,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9038, May 2021,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9038>.

   [W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
              Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., Maler, E., and
              F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
              Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-
              xml-20081126, November 2008,
              <https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126>.

8.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC7451]  Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible
              Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451,
              February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7451>.

Acknowledgments

   The authors wish to thank the following persons for their feedback
   and suggestions: James Gould, Michael Bauland, Patrick Mevzek, Quoc-
   Anh Pham, Raymond Zylstra, Christopher Martens, Anthony Eden, Neal
   McPherson, Craig Marchant, and Andreas Huber.

Authors' Addresses

   Tobias Sattler

   Email: mail@tobiassattler.com
   URI:   https://tobiassattler.com


   Roger Carney
   GoDaddy Inc.
   2155 E GoDaddy Way
   Tempe, AZ 85284
   United States of America

   Email: rcarney@godaddy.com
   URI:   https://www.godaddy.com


   Jody Kolker
   GoDaddy Inc.
   2155 E GoDaddy Way
   Tempe, AZ 85284
   United States of America

   Email: jkolker@godaddy.com
   URI:   https://www.godaddy.com