summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt
blob: c9bd423fa7f18ae2c009bd11cb53950fafa30ee8 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                             T. Li
Request for Comments: 9650                              Juniper Networks
Updates: 5029                                                August 2024
Category: Standards Track                                               
ISSN: 2070-1721


 Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute
                               Bit Values

Abstract

   RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", defines an
   IANA registry called "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values".
   This document changes the registration procedure for that registry
   from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review".  This document updates
   RFC 5029.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9650.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
   Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
   in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
   2.  IANA Considerations
   3.  Security Considerations
   4.  References
     4.1.  Normative References
     4.2.  Informative References
   Acknowledgements
   Author's Address

1.  Introduction

   [RFC5029] defines the "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values"
   registry and specifies a registration procedure of "Standards
   Action".  In practice, this registration procedure is unnecessarily
   restrictive, as it prevents allocation of bits to experimental
   protocols, which in turn increases the risk of conflicts introduced
   by use of unregistered code points (so-called "code point
   squatting").

   Accordingly, this document changes the registration procedure for the
   registry, as described in Section 2.

2.  IANA Considerations

   IANA has changed the registration procedure for the "IS-IS Neighbor
   Link-Attribute Bit Values" registry to "Expert Review" [RFC8126] and
   has listed this document as a reference for the registry.  General
   guidance for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370], and more
   specific guidance can be found in [RFC5029].

3.  Security Considerations

   This document does not affect the security issues discussed in
   [RFC5029].

4.  References

4.1.  Normative References

   [RFC5029]  Vasseur, JP. and S. Previdi, "Definition of an IS-IS Link
              Attribute Sub-TLV", RFC 5029, DOI 10.17487/RFC5029,
              September 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5029>.

4.2.  Informative References

   [RFC7370]  Ginsberg, L., "Updates to the IS-IS TLV Codepoints
              Registry", RFC 7370, DOI 10.17487/RFC7370, September 2014,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7370>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
              RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.

Acknowledgements

   The author would like to thank John Scudder for his contributions.

Author's Address

   Tony Li
   Juniper Networks
   Email: tony.li@tony.li