From a771d8d81175eb5ca1c47334cc24fe6eae3965ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Voss Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:51:09 +0200 Subject: Update README --- README.md | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 18f2fbb..cbbcf75 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -47,11 +47,21 @@ $ man 5 gsp # language documentation ## Why Not Use Pug or [INSERT LANGUAGE HERE] -Simply put, they are all trash. Pug has decent syntax but requires you use +~Simply put, they are all trash. Pug has decent syntax but requires you use JavaScript. All the others fall for the same kind of problem. As far as I could find, there is no pre-GSP transpiler from good syntax to HTML that works as just one binary you call on some files. All options force you into needing -to write JavaScript/Ruby/etc. scripts, which just isn’t good enough. +to write JavaScript/Ruby/etc. scripts, which just isn’t good enough.~ + +Update 28-05-2024: + +Turns out that PugCLI exists, which I actually did search for in the past but +somehow could not find. As a result my previous statements above do not hold, +although I still find it irritating that all ‘mainstream’ besides Pug that I am +aware of (as of this update) don’t just support basic single-binary usage. + +Feel free to use Pug, I simply do not care for the many Pug features I deem +useless or unergonomic (or both). ## Syntax Example -- cgit v1.2.3