summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt339
1 files changed, 339 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e1a7a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1204.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group S. Yeh
+Request for Comments: 1204 D. Lee
+ Netix Communications, Inc.
+ February 1991
+
+
+ Message Posting Protocol (MPP)
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo describes a protocol for posting messages from workstations
+ (e.g., PCs) to a mail service host. This RFC specifies an
+ Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. Discussion and
+ suggestions for improvement are requested. Please refer to the
+ current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the
+ standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of
+ this memo is unlimited.
+
+1. INTRODUCTION
+
+ Operating systems for personal computers do not provide a mechanism
+ for user authentication. However, such a mechanism is crucial for
+ electronic mail system since authenticating message sender's identity
+ is important in preventing mail forgery. Hence, adding personal
+ computers to an electronic mail network requires an agent (message
+ posting server) to authenticate sender's identity and then submit
+ mail to the message delivery system (e.g., Sendmail, MMDF) on behalf
+ of the sender at a PC. The Netix Message Posting Protocol is
+ developed to be the interface between the message posting server and
+ the PC (client). The protocol is designed to use TCP and is based on
+ the command and reply structures defined for Simple Mail Transfer
+ Protocol (RFC 821) and File Transfer Protocol (RFC 959).
+
+2. SPECIFICATIONS
+
+2.1. Command List
+
+ USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
+ PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
+ DATA <CRLF>
+ NOOP <CRLF>
+ QUIT <CRLF>
+
+2.2. Reply List
+
+ 220 Message Posting Service Ready.
+ 221 Closing Connection.
+ 250 Command OK.
+
+
+
+Yeh & Lee [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
+
+
+ 354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
+ 451 Local error encountered.
+ 500 Command unrecognized.
+ 501 Argument syntax error.
+ 503 Illegal command sequence.
+ 530 Authentication Failure.
+ 550 Error.
+
+2.3. Command and Reply Descriptions
+
+ USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
+
+ The USER command informs the message posting server about the
+ username of the user trying to submit mail to the network. The
+ required argument for the USER command is a string specifying
+ the message sender's username.
+
+ The USER command can only be used under three conditions:
+
+ - when the session with the message posting server has just
+ started;
+
+ - right after a message text (terminated by the "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
+ sequence) has been successfully submitted to the message
+ posting server;
+
+ - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 501.
+
+ List of possible reply codes for the USER command:
+
+ - 250 The username of the message sender has been accepted.
+
+ - 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+ server.
+
+ - 501 Syntax error detected in the username argument.
+
+ - 503 The USER command has been used under an inappropriate
+ condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
+
+ It is recommended that the message posting server should return
+ 250 even if the username is not recognized by the message
+ posting server, as long as the username is syntactically
+ correct. This is an attempt to prevent the message posting
+ server from releasing too much information about the user
+ database. Client should not be able to test the existence of a
+ certain username.
+
+
+
+
+Yeh & Lee [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
+
+
+ PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
+
+ The PASS command is used to inform the message posting server
+ about the password associated with the username previously
+ specified. The required argument for the PASS command is a
+ string specifying the message sender's password.
+
+ The PASS command can only be used under two conditions:
+
+ - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 250;
+
+ - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 501.
+
+ List of possible reply codes for the PASS command:
+
+ - 250 The password has been accepted and verified to be
+ correctly associated with the username previously
+ specified.
+
+ - 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+ server.
+
+ - 501 Syntax error detected in the password argument.
+
+ - 503 The PASS command has been used under an inappropriate
+ condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
+
+ - 530 The password provided is not the one associated with the
+ username previously specified.
+
+ DATA <CRLF>
+
+ The DATA command is used to inform the message posting server
+ to get ready to accept a mail message text. No argument is
+ expected. (This command has the same meaning as the DATA
+ command defined in RFC 821.)
+
+ The DATA command can only be used under two conditions:
+
+ - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 250;
+
+ - right after a mail message text has been successfully
+ accepted from the client.
+
+ List of possible reply codes for the DATA command:
+
+ - 354 The message posting server is ready to accept the mail
+ message text.
+
+
+
+Yeh & Lee [Page 3]
+
+RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
+
+
+ - 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+ server.
+
+ - 503 The DATA command has been used under an inappropriate
+ condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
+
+ Upon receiving the reply code 354 for the DATA command, the
+ client should submit the mail message text to message posting
+ server and terminate the text by the sequence "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
+ as defined in RFC 821. If the message text includes the
+ "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, then the sequence is replaced by the
+ "<CRLF>..<CRLF>" sequence as defined in RFC 821. The extra "."
+ token will not be included in the final copy of the submitted
+ message.
+
+ Upon receiving the mail message text terminated by the
+ "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, list of possible reply codes is:
+
+ - 250 The mail message text has been successfully queued for
+ delivery.
+
+ - 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+ server and the mail message text has not been queued.
+
+ NOOP <CRLF>
+
+ The NOOP command does not cause any action to be performed by
+ the message posting server. Instead, it tests the status of
+ the message posting server. No argument is expected.
+
+ The NOOP command cannot be used under one condition:
+
+ - right after a DATA command that gets the reply code 354
+ (i.e., when the message posting server is expecting the client
+ to submit the mail message text).
+
+ List of possible reply codes for the NOOP command:
+
+ - 250 The message posting server has not encountered any
+ internal error.
+
+ - 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+ server during the current session.
+
+ QUIT <CRLF>
+
+ The QUIT command is used to terminate the session with the
+ message posting server. No argument is expected.
+
+
+
+Yeh & Lee [Page 4]
+
+RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
+
+
+ The QUIT command can be used under any condition. The message
+ posting server should always return the reply code 221 for the
+ QUIT command.
+
+3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MESSAGE POSTING SERVER
+
+ There are several issues to be considered when implementing the
+ message posting server:
+
+ - secured environment
+ - port number assignment
+ - handling of idle client
+ - local/remote password database
+ - message queuing
+ - handling of message delivery failure
+
+3.1 Secured Environment
+
+ The message posting server is responsible for authenticating message
+ senders and submitting mail to the message delivery system. Hence,
+ it should be running in a secured environment, such as running on a
+ system (UNIX, VMS, MS-DOS) with well restricted physical and network
+ access.
+
+3.2 Port Number Assignment
+
+ Port 218 is assigned for the Netix Message Posting Protocol.
+
+3.3 Handling of Idle Client
+
+ The message posting server should terminate a session if the client
+ has been idle for too long, to release the resource allocated for the
+ session.
+
+3.4 Local/Remote Password Database
+
+ To take advantage of existing password databases, such as the passwd
+ file in UNIX, the message posting server can use FTP and POP3 to
+ perform the username and password checking with the appropriate
+ server.
+
+ For network that does not have any password database, the message
+ posting server should let the system administrator specify a local
+ password file on the host that the message posting server is running.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Yeh & Lee [Page 5]
+
+RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
+
+
+3.5 Message Queuing
+
+ The message posting server should attempt to submit accepted messages
+ to the message delivery system as soon as possible.
+
+3.6 Handling of Message Delivery Failure
+
+ Failure in delivering messages should be handled by the message
+ delivery system and the message posting server should not interfere.
+
+4. REFERENCES
+
+ [1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 821,
+ USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
+
+ [2] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 959,
+ USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1985.
+
+Security Considerations
+
+ Security issues are discussed in section 3.1.
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Shannon Yeh
+ Netix Communications, Inc.
+ 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
+ Irvine, CA 92718
+
+ Phone: (714) 727-9335
+
+ Email: yeh@netix.com
+
+
+ David Lee
+ Netix Communications, Inc.
+ 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
+ Irvine, CA 92718
+
+ Phone: (714) 727-9335
+
+ EMail: dlee@netix.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Yeh & Lee [Page 6]
+ \ No newline at end of file