summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt619
1 files changed, 619 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3ecf74e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1462.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group E. Krol
+Request for Comments: 1462 University of Illinois
+FYI: 20 E. Hoffman
+ Merit Network, Inc.
+ May 1993
+
+
+ FYI on "What is the Internet?"
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
+ not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is
+ unlimited.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This FYI RFC answers the question, "What is the Internet?" and is
+ produced by the User Services Working Group of the Internet
+ Engineering Task Force (IETF). Containing a modified chapter from Ed
+ Krol's 1992 book, "The Whole Internet User's Guide and Catalog," the
+ paper covers the Internet's definition, history, administration,
+ protocols, financing, and current issues such as growth,
+ commercialization, and privatization.
+
+Introduction
+
+ A commonly asked question is "What is the Internet?" The reason such
+ a question gets asked so often is because there's no agreed upon
+ answer that neatly sums up the Internet. The Internet can be thought
+ about in relation to its common protocols, as a physical collection
+ of routers and circuits, as a set of shared resources, or even as an
+ attitude about interconnecting and intercommunication. Some common
+ definitions given in the past include:
+
+ * a network of networks based on the TCP/IP protocols,
+ * a community of people who use and develop those networks,
+ * a collection of resources that can be reached from those
+ networks.
+
+ Today's Internet is a global resource connecting millions of users
+ that began as an experiment over 20 years ago by the U.S. Department
+ of Defense. While the networks that make up the Internet are based on
+ a standard set of protocols (a mutually agreed upon method of
+ communication between parties), the Internet also has gateways to
+ networks and services that are based on other protocols.
+
+
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ To help answer the question more completely, the rest of this paper
+ contains an updated second chapter from "The Whole Internet User's
+ Guide and Catalog" by Ed Krol (1992) that gives a more thorough
+ explanation. (The excerpt is published through the gracious
+ permission of the publisher, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.)
+
+The Internet (excerpt from "The Whole Internet User's Guide and
+Catalog")
+
+ The Internet was born about 20 years ago, trying to connect together
+ a U.S. Defense Department network called the ARPAnet and various
+ other radio and satellite networks. The ARPAnet was an experimental
+ network designed to support military research--in particular,
+ research about how to build networks that could withstand partial
+ outages (like bomb attacks) and still function. (Think about this
+ when I describe how the network works; it may give you some insight
+ into the design of the Internet.) In the ARPAnet model, communication
+ always occurs between a source and a destination computer. The
+ network itself is assumed to be unreliable; any portion of the
+ network could disappear at any moment (pick your favorite
+ catastrophe--these days backhoes cutting cables are more of a threat
+ than bombs). It was designed to require the minimum of information
+ from the computer clients. To send a message on the network, a
+ computer only had to put its data in an envelope, called an Internet
+ Protocol (IP) packet, and "address" the packets correctly. The
+ communicating computers--not the network itself--were also given the
+ responsibility to ensure that the communication was accomplished. The
+ philosophy was that every computer on the network could talk, as a
+ peer, with any other computer.
+
+ These decisions may sound odd, like the assumption of an "unreliable"
+ network, but history has proven that most of them were reasonably
+ correct. Although the Organization for International Standardization
+ (ISO) was spending years designing the ultimate standard for computer
+ networking, people could not wait. Internet developers in the US, UK
+ and Scandinavia, responding to market pressures, began to put their
+ IP software on every conceivable type of computer. It became the only
+ practical method for computers from different manufacturers to
+ communicate. This was attractive to the government and universities,
+ which didn't have policies saying that all computers must be bought
+ from the same vendor. Everyone bought whichever computer they liked,
+ and expected the computers to work together over the network.
+
+ At about the same time as the Internet was coming into being,
+ Ethernet local area networks ("LANs") were developed. This technology
+ matured quietly, until desktop workstations became available around
+ 1983. Most of these workstations came with Berkeley UNIX, which
+ included IP networking software. This created a new demand: rather
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ than connecting to a single large timesharing computer per site,
+ organizations wanted to connect the ARPAnet to their entire local
+ network. This would allow all the computers on that LAN to access
+ ARPAnet facilities. About the same time, other organizations started
+ building their own networks using the same communications protocols
+ as the ARPAnet: namely, IP and its relatives. It became obvious that
+ if these networks could talk together, users on one network could
+ communicate with those on another; everyone would benefit.
+
+ One of the most important of these newer networks was the NSFNET,
+ commissioned by the National Science Foundation (NSF), an agency of
+ the U.S. government. In the late 80's the NSF created five
+ supercomputer centers. Up to this point, the world's fastest
+ computers had only been available to weapons developers and a few
+ researchers from very large corporations. By creating supercomputer
+ centers, the NSF was making these resources available for any
+ scholarly research. Only five centers were created because they were
+ so expensive--so they had to be shared. This created a communications
+ problem: they needed a way to connect their centers together and to
+ allow the clients of these centers to access them. At first, the NSF
+ tried to use the ARPAnet for communications, but this strategy failed
+ because of bureaucracy and staffing problems.
+
+ In response, NSF decided to build its own network, based on the
+ ARPAnet's IP technology. It connected the centers with 56,000 bit per
+ second (56k bps) telephone lines. (This is roughly the ability to
+ transfer two full typewritten pages per second. That's slow by
+ modern standards, but was reasonably fast in the mid 80's.) It was
+ obvious, however, that if they tried to connect every university
+ directly to a supercomputing center, they would go broke. You pay for
+ these telephone lines by the mile. One line per campus with a
+ supercomputing center at the hub, like spokes on a bike wheel, adds
+ up to lots of miles of phone lines. Therefore, they decided to create
+ regional networks. In each area of the country, schools would be
+ connected to their nearest neighbor. Each chain was connected to a
+ supercomputer center at one point and the centers were connected
+ together. With this configuration, any computer could eventually
+ communicate with any other by forwarding the conversation through its
+ neighbors.
+
+ This solution was successful--and, like any successful solution, a
+ time came when it no longer worked. Sharing supercomputers also
+ allowed the connected sites to share a lot of other things not
+ related to the centers. Suddenly these schools had a world of data
+ and collaborators at their fingertips. The network's traffic
+ increased until, eventually, the computers controlling the network
+ and the telephone lines connecting them were overloaded. In 1987, a
+ contract to manage and upgrade the network was awarded to Merit
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 3]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ Network Inc., which ran Michigan's educational network, in
+ partnership with IBM and MCI. The old network was replaced with
+ faster telephone lines (by a factor of 20), with faster computers to
+ control it.
+
+ The process of running out of horsepower and getting bigger engines
+ and better roads continues to this day. Unlike changes to the highway
+ system, however, most of these changes aren't noticed by the people
+ trying to use the Internet to do real work. You won't go to your
+ office, log in to your computer, and find a message saying that the
+ Internet will be inaccessible for the next six months because of
+ improvements. Perhaps even more important: the process of running out
+ of capacity and improving the network has created a technology that's
+ extremely mature and practical. The ideas have been tested; problems
+ have appeared, and problems have been solved.
+
+ For our purposes, the most important aspect of the NSF's networking
+ effort is that it allowed everyone to access the network. Up to that
+ point, Internet access had been available only to researchers in
+ computer science, government employees, and government contractors.
+ The NSF promoted universal educational access by funding campus
+ connections only if the campus had a plan to spread the access
+ around. So everyone attending a four year college could become an
+ Internet user.
+
+ The demand keeps growing. Now that most four-year colleges are
+ connected, people are trying to get secondary and primary schools
+ connected. People who have graduated from college know what the
+ Internet is good for, and talk their employers into connecting
+ corporations. All this activity points to continued growth,
+ networking problems to solve, evolving technologies, and job security
+ for networkers.
+
+What Makes Up the Internet?
+
+ What comprises the Internet is a difficult question; the answer
+ changes over time. Five years ago the answer would have been easy:
+ "All the networks, using the IP protocol, which cooperate to form a
+ seamless network for their collective users." This would include
+ various federal networks, a set of regional networks, campus
+ networks, and some foreign networks.
+
+ More recently, some non-IP-based networks saw that the Internet was
+ good. They wanted to provide its services to their clientele. So they
+ developed methods of connecting these "strange" networks (e.g.,
+ Bitnet, DECnets, etc.) to the Internet. At first these connections,
+ called "gateways", merely served to transfer electronic mail between
+ the two networks. Some, however, have grown to translate other
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 4]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ services between the networks as well. Are they part of the Internet?
+ Maybe yes and maybe no. It depends on whether, in their hearts, they
+ want to be. If this sounds strange, read on--it gets stranger.
+
+Who Governs the Internet?
+
+ In many ways the Internet is like a church: it has its council of
+ elders, every member has an opinion about how things should work, and
+ you can either take part or not. It's your choice. The Internet has
+ no president, chief operating officer, or Pope. The constituent
+ networks may have presidents and CEO's, but that's a different issue;
+ there's no single authority figure for the Internet as a whole.
+
+ The ultimate authority for where the Internet is going rests with the
+ Internet Society, or ISOC. ISOC is a voluntary membership
+ organization whose purpose is to promote global information exchange
+ through Internet technology. (If you'd like more information, or if
+ you would like to join, contact information is provided in the "For
+ More Information" section, near the end of this document.) It
+ appoints a council of elders, which has responsibility for the
+ technical management and direction of the Internet.
+
+ The council of elders is a group of invited volunteers called the
+ Internet Architecture Board, or the IAB. The IAB meets regularly to
+ "bless" standards and allocate resources, like addresses. The
+ Internet works because there are standard ways for computers and
+ software applications to talk to each other. This allows computers
+ from different vendors to communicate without problems. It's not an
+ IBM-only or Sun-only or Macintosh-only network. The IAB is
+ responsible for these standards; it decides when a standard is
+ necessary, and what the standard should be. When a standard is
+ required, it considers the problem, adopts a standard, and announces
+ it via the network. (You were expecting stone tablets?) The IAB also
+ keeps track of various numbers (and other things) that must remain
+ unique. For example, each computer on the Internet has a unique 32-
+ bit address; no other computer has the same address. How does this
+ address get assigned? The IAB worries about these kinds of problems.
+ It doesn't actually assign the addresses, but it makes the rules
+ about how to assign addresses.
+
+ As in a church, everyone has opinions about how things ought to run.
+ Internet users express their opinions through meetings of the
+ Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). The IETF is another volunteer
+ organization; it meets regularly to discuss operational and near-term
+ technical problems of the Internet. When it considers a problem
+ important enough to merit concern, the IETF sets up a "working group"
+ for further investigation. (In practice, "important enough" usually
+ means that there are enough people to volunteer for the working
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 5]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ group.) Anyone can attend IETF meetings and be on working groups; the
+ important thing is that they work. Working groups have many different
+ functions, ranging from producing documentation, to deciding how
+ networks should cooperate when problems occur, to changing the
+ meaning of the bits in some kind of packet. A working group usually
+ produces a report. Depending on the kind of recommendation, it could
+ just be documentation and made available to anyone wanting it, it
+ could be accepted voluntarily as a good idea which people follow, or
+ it could be sent to the IAB to be declared a standard.
+
+ If you go to a church and accept its teachings and philosophy, you
+ are accepted by it, and receive the benefits. If you don't like it,
+ you can leave. The church is still there, and you get none of the
+ benefits. Such is the Internet. If a network accepts the teachings of
+ the Internet, is connected to it, and considers itself part of it,
+ then it is part of the Internet. It will find things it doesn't like
+ and can address those concerns through the IETF. Some concerns may be
+ considered valid and the Internet may change accordingly. Some of
+ the changes may run counter to the religion, and be rejected. If the
+ network does something that causes damage to the Internet, it could
+ be excommunicated until it mends its evil ways.
+
+Who Pays for It?
+
+ The old rule for when things are confusing is "follow the money."
+ Well, this won't help you to understand the Internet. No one pays for
+ "it"; there is no Internet, Inc. that collects fees from all Internet
+ networks or users. Instead, everyone pays for their part. The NSF
+ pays for NSFNET. NASA pays for the NASA Science Internet. Networks
+ get together and decide how to connect themselves together and fund
+ these interconnections. A college or corporation pays for their
+ connection to some regional network, which in turn pays a national
+ provider for its access.
+
+What Does This Mean for Me?
+
+ The concept that the Internet is not a network, but a collection of
+ networks, means little to the end user. You want to do something
+ useful: run a program, or access some unique data. You shouldn't have
+ to worry about how it's all stuck together. Consider the telephone
+ system--it's an internet, too. Pacific Bell, AT&T, MCI, British
+ Telephony, Telefonos de Mexico, and so on, are all separate
+ corporations that run pieces of the telephone system. They worry
+ about how to make it all work together; all you have to do is dial.
+
+ If you ignore cost and commercials, you shouldn't care if you are
+ dealing with MCI, AT&T, or Sprint. Dial the number and it works.
+
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 6]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ You only care who carries your calls when a problem occurs. If
+ something goes out of service, only one of those companies can fix
+ it. They talk to each other about problems, but each phone carrier is
+ responsible for fixing problems on its own part of the system. The
+ same is true on the Internet. Each network has its own network
+ operations center (NOC). The operation centers talk to each other and
+ know how to resolve problems. Your site has a contract with one of
+ the Internet's constituent networks, and its job is to keep your site
+ happy. So if something goes wrong, they are the ones to gripe at. If
+ it's not their problem, they'll pass it along.
+
+What Does the Future Hold?
+
+ Finally, a question I can answer. It's not that I have a crystal ball
+ (if I did I'd spend my time on Wall Street instead of writing a
+ book). Rather, these are the things that the IAB and the IETF discuss
+ at their meetings. Most people don't care about the long discussions;
+ they only want to know how they'll be affected. So, here are
+ highlights of the networking future.
+
+New Standard Protocols
+
+ When I was talking about how the Internet started, I mentioned the
+ International Standards Organization (ISO) and their set of protocol
+ standards. Well, they finally finished designing it. Now it is an
+ international standard, typically referred to as the ISO/OSI (Open
+ Systems Interconnect) protocol suite. Many of the Internet's
+ component networks allow use of OSI today. There isn't much demand,
+ yet. The U.S. government has taken a position that government
+ computers should be able to speak these protocols. Many have the
+ software, but few are using it now.
+
+ It's really unclear how much demand there will be for OSI,
+ notwithstanding the government backing. Many people feel that the
+ current approach isn't broke, so why fix it? They are just becoming
+ comfortable with what they have, why should they have to learn a new
+ set of commands and terminology just because it is the standard?
+
+ Currently there are no real advantages to moving to OSI. It is more
+ complex and less mature than IP, and hence doesn't work as
+ efficiently. OSI does offer hope of some additional features, but it
+ also suffers from some of the same problems which will plague IP as
+ the network gets much bigger and faster. It's clear that some sites
+ will convert to the OSI protocols over the next few years. The
+ question is: how many?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 7]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+International Connections
+
+ The Internet has been an international network for a long time, but
+ it only extended to the United States' allies and overseas military
+ bases. Now, with the less paranoid world environment, the Internet is
+ spreading everywhere. It's currently in over 50 countries, and the
+ number is rapidly increasing. Eastern European countries longing for
+ western scientific ties have wanted to participate for a long time,
+ but were excluded by government regulation. This ban has been
+ relaxed. Third world countries that formerly didn't have the means to
+ participate now view the Internet as a way to raise their education
+ and technology levels.
+
+ In Europe, the development of the Internet used to be hampered by
+ national policies mandating OSI protocols, regarding IP as a cultural
+ threat akin to EuroDisney. These policies prevented development of
+ large scale Internet infrastructures except for the Scandinavian
+ countries which embraced the Internet protocols long ago and are
+ already well-connected. In 1989, RIPE (Reseaux IP Europeens) began
+ coordinating the operation of the Internet in Europe and presently
+ about 25% of all hosts connected to the Internet are located in
+ Europe.
+
+ At present, the Internet's international expansion is hampered by the
+ lack of a good supporting infrastructure, namely a decent telephone
+ system. In both Eastern Europe and the third world, a state-of-the-
+ art phone system is nonexistent. Even in major cities, connections
+ are limited to the speeds available to the average home anywhere in
+ the U.S., 9600 bits/second. Typically, even if one of these countries
+ is "on the Internet," only a few sites are accessible. Usually, this
+ is the major technical university for that country. However, as phone
+ systems improve, you can expect this to change too; more and more,
+ you'll see smaller sites (even individual home systems) connecting to
+ the Internet.
+
+Commercialization
+
+ Many big corporations have been on the Internet for years. For the
+ most part, their participation has been limited to their research and
+ engineering departments. The same corporations used some other
+ network (usually a private network) for their business
+ communications. After all, this IP stuff was only an academic toy.
+ The IBM mainframes that handled their commercial data processing did
+ the "real" networking using a protocol suite called System Network
+ Architecture (SNA).
+
+ Businesses are now discovering that running multiple networks is
+ expensive. Some are beginning to look to the Internet for "one-stop"
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 8]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ network shopping. They were scared away in the past by policies which
+ excluded or restricted commercial use. Many of these policies are
+ under review and will change. As these restrictions drop, commercial
+ use of the Internet will become progressively more common.
+
+ This should be especially good for small businesses. Motorola or
+ Standard Oil can afford to run nationwide networks connecting their
+ sites, but Ace Custom Software couldn't. If Ace has a San Jose office
+ and a Washington office, all it needs is an Internet connection on
+ each end. For all practical purposes, they have a nationwide
+ corporate network, just like the big boys.
+
+Privatization
+
+ Right behind commercialization comes privatization. For years, the
+ networking community has wanted the telephone companies and other
+ for-profit ventures to provide "off the shelf" IP connections. That
+ is, just like you can place an order for a telephone jack in your
+ house for your telephone, you could do this for an Internet
+ connection. You order, the telephone installer leaves, and you plug
+ your computer into the Internet. Except for Bolt, Beranek and Newman,
+ the company that ran the ARPAnet, there weren't any takers. The
+ telephone companies have historically said, "We'll sell you phone
+ lines, and you can do whatever you like with them." By default, the
+ Federal government stayed in the networking business.
+
+ Now that large corporations have become interested in the Internet,
+ the phone companies have started to change their attitude. Now they
+ and other profit-oriented network purveyors complain that the
+ government ought to get out of the network business. After all, who
+ best can provide network services but the "phone companies"? They've
+ got the ear of a lot of political people, to whom it appears to be a
+ reasonable thing. If you talk to phone company personnel, many of
+ them still don't really understand what the Internet is about. They
+ ain't got religion, but they are studying the Bible furiously.
+ (Apologies to those telephone company employees who saw the light
+ years ago and have been trying to drag their employers into church.)
+
+ Although most people in the networking community think that
+ privatization is a good idea, there are some obstacles in the way.
+ Most revolve around the funding for the connections that are already
+ in place. Many schools are connected because the government pays part
+ of the bill. If they had to pay their own way, some schools would
+ probably decide to spend their money elsewhere. Major research
+ institutions would certainly stay on the net; but some smaller
+ colleges might not, and the costs would probably be prohibitive for
+ most secondary schools (let alone grade schools). What if the school
+ could afford either an Internet connection or a science lab? It's
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 9]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+ unclear which one would get funded. The Internet has not yet become a
+ "necessity" in many people's minds. When it does, expect
+ privatization to come quickly.
+
+ Well, enough questions about the history of the information highway
+ system. It's time to walk to the edge of the road, try and hitch a
+ ride, and be on your way.
+
+Acknowledgments
+
+ We would like to thank O'Reilly & Associates for permission to
+ reprint the chapter from their book by Ed Krol (1992), "The Whole
+ Internet User's Guide and Catalog."
+
+For More Information
+
+ Hoffman, E. and L. Jackson. (1993) "FYI on Introducing the Internet
+ --A Short Bibliography of Introductory Internetworking Readings for
+ the Network Novice," 4 p. (FYI 19, RFC 1463).
+
+ To find out how to obtain this document and other on-line
+ introductory readings, send an e-mail message to:
+ nis-info@nis.merit.edu, with the following text:
+ send access.guide.
+
+ Krol, Ed. (1992) The Whole Internet User's Guide and Catalog,
+ O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA. ISBN 1-56592-025-2.
+
+ Quarterman, J. (1993) "Recent Internet Books," 15 p. (RFC 1432).
+
+ The Internet Society
+ Phone: (703) 620-8990
+ Fax: (703) 620-0913
+ E-mail: isoc@cnri.reston.va.us
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 10]
+
+RFC 1462 What is the Internet? May 1993
+
+
+Security Considerations
+
+ Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Ed Krol
+ Computing and Communications Service Office
+ Univ. of Illinois Urbana Champaign (UIUC)
+ 1304 W Springfield
+ Urbana, IL 61801
+
+ Phone: (217)333-7886
+ EMail: e-krol@uiuc.edu
+
+
+ Ellen Hoffman
+ Merit Network, Inc.
+ 2901 Hubbard, Pod-G
+ Ann Arbor, MI 48105
+
+ Phone: (313) 936-3000
+ EMail: ellen@merit.edu
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Krol & Hoffman [Page 11]
+ \ No newline at end of file