summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fe39348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. Postel
+Request for Comments: 1818 ISI
+BCP: 1 T. Li
+Category: Best Current Practice cisco Systems
+ Y. Rekhter
+ cisco Systems
+ August 1995
+
+
+ Best Current Practices
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
+ Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document describes a new series of documents which describe best
+ current practices for the Internet community. Documents in this
+ series carry the endorsement of the Internet Engineering Steering
+ Group (IESG).
+
+Discussion
+
+ The current IETF process has two types of RFCs: standards track
+ documents and other RFCs (e.g., informational, experimental, FYIs)
+ [1]. The intent of the standards track documents is clear, and
+ culminates in an official Internet Standard [2,3]. Informational
+ RFCs can be published on a less formal basis, subject to the
+ reasonable constraints of the RFC editor. Informational RFCs are not
+ subject to peer review and carry no significance whatsoever within
+ the IETF process [4].
+
+ The IETF currently has no other mechanism or means of publishing
+ relevant technical information which it endorses. This document
+ creates a new subseries of RFCs, entitled Best Current Practices
+ BCPs).
+
+ The BCP process is similar to that for proposed standards. The BCP
+ is submitted to the IESG for review, and the existing review process
+ applies, including a "last call" on the IETF announcement mailing
+ list. However, once the IESG has approved the document, the process
+ ends and the document is published. The resulting document is viewed
+ as having the technical approval of the IETF, but it is not, and
+ cannot become an official Internet Standard.
+
+
+
+
+Postel, Li & Rekhter Best Current Practice [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1818 Best Current Practices August 1995
+
+
+ Possible examples of technical information to which BCPs could be
+ applied are "OSI NSAP Allocation" [5], and "OSPF Applicability
+ Statement" [6].
+
+References
+
+ [1] IAB, and IESG, "Internet Standards Process -- Revision 2", RFC
+ 1602, IAB and IESG, March 1994.
+
+ [2] Postel, J., Editor, "Internet Official Protocol Standards", STD
+ 1, RFC 1800, IAB, July 1995.
+
+ [3] Hinden, R., "Internet Engineering Task Force Internet Routing
+ Protocol Standardization Criteria", RFC 1264, BBN, October 1991.
+
+ [4] Waitzman, D., "Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on
+ Avian Carriers", RFC 1149, BBN, April 1990.
+
+ [5] Collela, R., Callon, R., Gardner, E., and Y. Rekhter, "Guidelines
+ for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet", RFC 1629, NIST,
+ Wellfleet, Mitre, IBM, May 1994.
+
+ [6] Chapin, L., "Applicability Statement for OSPF", RFC 1370, IAB,
+ October 1992.
+
+Security Considerations
+
+ Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Postel, Li & Rekhter Best Current Practice [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1818 Best Current Practices August 1995
+
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Jon Postel
+ USC - ISI, Suite 1001
+ 4676 Admiralty Way
+ Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695
+
+ Phone: 310-822-1511
+ EMail: postel@isi.edu
+
+
+ Yakov Rekhter
+ cisco Systems, Inc.
+ 170 West Tasman Drive
+ San Jose, CA 95134
+
+ Phone: 914-528-0090
+ EMail: yakov@cisco.com
+
+
+ Tony Li
+ cisco Systems, Inc.
+ 1525 O'Brien Drive
+ Menlo Park, CA 94025
+
+ EMail: tli@cisco.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Postel, Li & Rekhter Best Current Practice [Page 3]
+