diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt | 171 |
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe39348 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1818.txt @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group J. Postel +Request for Comments: 1818 ISI +BCP: 1 T. Li +Category: Best Current Practice cisco Systems + Y. Rekhter + cisco Systems + August 1995 + + + Best Current Practices + +Status of this Memo + + This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the + Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Abstract + + This document describes a new series of documents which describe best + current practices for the Internet community. Documents in this + series carry the endorsement of the Internet Engineering Steering + Group (IESG). + +Discussion + + The current IETF process has two types of RFCs: standards track + documents and other RFCs (e.g., informational, experimental, FYIs) + [1]. The intent of the standards track documents is clear, and + culminates in an official Internet Standard [2,3]. Informational + RFCs can be published on a less formal basis, subject to the + reasonable constraints of the RFC editor. Informational RFCs are not + subject to peer review and carry no significance whatsoever within + the IETF process [4]. + + The IETF currently has no other mechanism or means of publishing + relevant technical information which it endorses. This document + creates a new subseries of RFCs, entitled Best Current Practices + BCPs). + + The BCP process is similar to that for proposed standards. The BCP + is submitted to the IESG for review, and the existing review process + applies, including a "last call" on the IETF announcement mailing + list. However, once the IESG has approved the document, the process + ends and the document is published. The resulting document is viewed + as having the technical approval of the IETF, but it is not, and + cannot become an official Internet Standard. + + + + +Postel, Li & Rekhter Best Current Practice [Page 1] + +RFC 1818 Best Current Practices August 1995 + + + Possible examples of technical information to which BCPs could be + applied are "OSI NSAP Allocation" [5], and "OSPF Applicability + Statement" [6]. + +References + + [1] IAB, and IESG, "Internet Standards Process -- Revision 2", RFC + 1602, IAB and IESG, March 1994. + + [2] Postel, J., Editor, "Internet Official Protocol Standards", STD + 1, RFC 1800, IAB, July 1995. + + [3] Hinden, R., "Internet Engineering Task Force Internet Routing + Protocol Standardization Criteria", RFC 1264, BBN, October 1991. + + [4] Waitzman, D., "Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on + Avian Carriers", RFC 1149, BBN, April 1990. + + [5] Collela, R., Callon, R., Gardner, E., and Y. Rekhter, "Guidelines + for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet", RFC 1629, NIST, + Wellfleet, Mitre, IBM, May 1994. + + [6] Chapin, L., "Applicability Statement for OSPF", RFC 1370, IAB, + October 1992. + +Security Considerations + + Security issues are not discussed in this memo. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Postel, Li & Rekhter Best Current Practice [Page 2] + +RFC 1818 Best Current Practices August 1995 + + +Authors' Addresses + + Jon Postel + USC - ISI, Suite 1001 + 4676 Admiralty Way + Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695 + + Phone: 310-822-1511 + EMail: postel@isi.edu + + + Yakov Rekhter + cisco Systems, Inc. + 170 West Tasman Drive + San Jose, CA 95134 + + Phone: 914-528-0090 + EMail: yakov@cisco.com + + + Tony Li + cisco Systems, Inc. + 1525 O'Brien Drive + Menlo Park, CA 94025 + + EMail: tli@cisco.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Postel, Li & Rekhter Best Current Practice [Page 3] + |