summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt451
1 files changed, 451 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c2515be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1820.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,451 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group E. Huizer
+Request for Comments: 1820 SURFnet bv
+Category: Informational August 1995
+
+
+ Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent Checklist
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
+ does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
+ this memo is unlimited.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document presents a checklist to facilitate evaluation of MIME
+ capable User Agents. Access to a MIME test-responder, that generates
+ test-messages is described.
+
+Introduction
+
+ This document presents a checklist that facilitates evaluation of
+ MIME capable E-mail User Agents. It is by no means a conformance or
+ interoperability (both strictly defined and measurable quantities)
+ checklist, but rather an interworking (practical perspective)
+ checklist that is aimed at the users and system managers.
+
+Usage and submission
+
+ If you use this checklist against a specific product (regardless of
+ whether you're a vendor, implementor or user) you can submit the
+ result to mime-check@relay.surfnet.nl and this information will be
+ made available (at no cost) through WWW (to be announced) for other
+ people to browse through.
+
+ Although SURFnet will attempt to verify the correctness of each
+ submission, all submitted, information is made available as is, with
+ no guarantees (SURFnet does not take any responsibility for errors in
+ the data that is made available, or for any damages resulting from
+ usage of that data). Users who want to procure a UA are advised to
+ use the data as an orientation, and to perform their own procurement
+ tests (possibly using the checklist below as a guideline). Also it is
+ noted that vendors and implementors are encouraged to use the results
+ from the checklist to improve their products.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+Getting test messages
+
+ For several tests in the checklist a test message is required. Test
+ messages can be requested in the following way: Send mail to <mime-
+ test@relay.surfnet.nl> with a subject field containing ONE of the
+ following:
+
+ text/plain
+ text/enriched
+ image/gif
+ image/jpeg
+ audio/basic
+ video/mpeg
+ application/octet-stream
+ application/postscript
+ message/rfc822
+ message/partial
+ message/external
+ multipart/mixed
+ multipart/parallel
+ multipart/digest
+ multipart/alternative
+ application/wordperfect5.1
+ application/msword
+ application/rtf
+ X-local <to test how your UA deals with undefined content-types>
+ nested <returns a message that contains nested multipart contents>
+ iso-8859-1 <returns a message with text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1>
+
+ A message containing the requested content-type will be returned to
+ the address contained in the from field.
+
+References
+
+ The reader is encouraged to also check out the following references:
+
+ The MIME standards:
+
+ - Borenstein N. and N. Freed, "MIME (Multipurpose Internet
+ Mail Extensions) Part One: Mechanisms for specifying and
+ describing the format of Internet message bodies", RFC 1521,
+ Bellcore, Innosoft, September 1993.
+
+ - Moore K., "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part
+ Two: Message header extensions for non-Ascii text", RFC 1522,
+ University of Tennessee, September 1993.
+
+
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+ The registration procedure for content types:
+
+ - Postel J., "Media type registration procedure", RFC 1590,
+ USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1994.
+
+ Some related informational documents:
+
+ - Borenstein N., "The text/enriched MIME content-type",
+ RFC 1563, Bellcore, October 1994.
+
+ - Borenstein N., "A user agent configuration mechanism for
+ multimedia mail format information", RFC 1524, Bellcore,
+ September 1993.
+
+ Registered MIME content-types can be found at the following URL:
+ ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/media-types
+
+ The SUNet MIME project: http://www.chalmers.se/SUNET/Mac-E.html This
+ offers evaluation tests reports of MIME products, as well as tests
+ and test-criteria for MIME implementors.
+
+ From Stockholm University a list of user-interface requirments for a
+ mail/news reader is available under: gopher://mars.dsv.su.se/11/dsv-
+ reports/research-reports/messaging- research
+
+Checklist for Mime UAs
+
+ (note that for items with multiple choice options, it is possible
+ that more than one option is applicable)
+
+ 1. General information:
+ 1.1 The name and version of the product
+ 1.2 The name and addressing information of the manufacturer
+ 1.3 What are the platforms that are supported (Operating system,
+ GUI and hardware requirements, if applicable: what APIs are
+ supported (like MAPI etc.))? [Note: Please use separate
+ checklist forms for different platforms!!]
+ 1.4 What is the platform that was used for this checklist
+ (Operating system, GUI and hardware)? [Note: Only one
+ platform per checklist!!]
+ 1.5 Is the software available in source format or in binary
+ format or both.
+ 1.6 Pricing information. Is the software available:
+ - In the Public Domain, free of charge
+ - As shareware (what is the price?)
+ - PD for non-profit use, but not for commercial use
+ - Commercially
+
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 3]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+ 2. System installation, configuration and management
+ 2.1 How complex/easy is installation and configuration? Are
+ there any pitfalls that need attention? Can you configure
+ per set of users (i.e systemwide or LAN wide default
+ configuration) and/or per user?
+ 2.2 Are there facilities for logging and/or accounting?
+ 2.3 Does the UA generate correct RFC 822 headers for outgoing
+ messages:
+ From:, (and if necessary) Sender:
+ Date:
+ Message-id:
+ 2.4 Is it possible for a non-priviledged user to change the
+ "from" and/or "sender" field?
+ 2.5 Does the UA have any size restrictions (default or applied
+ by system manager) for:
+ - Message size
+ - Number of messages
+ - Number of folders
+ - Number of messages per folder
+ 2.6 How secure is the users mailbox when using this UA? Can
+ other non-privileged usets access the mailbox?
+ 2.7 What is the performance of the UA on this platform? (As this
+ is difficult to measure, give your subjective impression:
+ slow, reasonable or fast) E.g for:
+ - Displaying a text message
+ - Displaying a MIME message that contains an image
+ - Complex actions like sorting etc.
+
+ 3. General UA properties
+ 3.1 Does the UA have a graphical or a character based interface
+ or both?
+ 3.2 Does the UA support native RFC 822/MIME or does it require a
+ gateway?
+ 3.3 Which protocols are supported for message delivery:
+ a. SMTP (MX records or static routing to Mailhost)
+ b. ESMTP
+ c. POP (which version)
+ d. IMAP
+ e. Co-location with specific MTA (which MTA)
+ f. Other ...............
+ 3.4 Which protocols are supported for message submission:
+ a. SMTP
+ b. ESMTP
+ c. Co-location with specific MTA (which MTA)
+ d. Other ...............
+ 3.5 Does the UA support the following basic functionalities:
+ - List messages
+ - Read messages
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 4]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+ - Delete messages
+ - Compose new messages
+ - Reply to messages (Inclusion of original message-text in
+ reply, reply to originator or to any or all recipients
+ etc.)
+ - Forward message
+ o using MIME
+ o using RFC 934 encapsulation; i.e. message is
+ encapsulated in between:
+ ------- Forwarded Message and
+ ------- End of Forwarded Message
+ o Other .......
+ - Distribute message (the from field does not change)
+ 3.6 Does the UA support the following header fields and can they
+ be supplied by the user:
+ Generated correctly Can be supplied by user
+ - To:
+ - Cc:
+ - Bcc:
+ - From:
+ - Reply-to:
+ - Subject:
+ - Comments:
+ 3.7 Does the UA support filing mail into folders? Are there any
+ restrictions?
+ 3.8 Does the UA support a filtering mechanism that allows the
+ user to configure automatic processing of incoming mail
+ (e.g. automatic filing into specific folders)? If so, how
+ simple is the configuration of these filters?
+ 3.9 Does the UA support a sorting mechanism that allows the user
+ to sort mail on date and/or subject and/or from field etc?
+ If so describe the possibilities and restrictions.
+ 3.10 Does the UA support address lists and/or directory services?
+ - Local (local address list, local aliases, local distribution
+ lists etc.)
+ - Whois++
+ - Ph (to CCSO server)
+ - LDAP or SOLO or other access protocols to a directory
+ service
+ - Other .....
+ 3.11 What other non-multimedia facilities does the UA support?
+ 3.12 What secure mail protocols does the UA support (in-line):
+ - PEM (Privacy Enhanced Mail)
+ - PGP (Pretty Good Privacy)
+ - Other.....
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 5]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+ 4. MIME support
+ 4.1 Does the UA support:
+ - viewing a MIME content (either in-line or through launching
+ an external viewer)?
+ - saving a MIME content in a file?
+ - saving one part of a multipart message in a file?
+ - printing a MIME content?
+ 4.2 Does the UA support receipt of the following basic MIME
+ content types? Does it display them in-line and does it
+ support printing of such a content type? If an external
+ viewer is needed, is a viewer pre-configured? Is the viewer
+ included in the software distribution?
+ In-line Printing External Preconfig Included
+ - text/plain
+ - text/enriched
+ - image/gif
+ - image/jpeg
+ - audio/basic
+ - video/mpeg
+ - application/octet-stream
+ - application/postscript
+ - message/rfc822
+ - message/partial
+ Does the UA support ftp and/or mail access for:
+ - message/external
+ Describe how the UA supports the basic multipart types:
+ - multipart/mixed
+ - multipart/parallel
+ - multipart/digest
+ - multipart/alternative
+ How does the UA handle:
+ - X-<bilateraly defined>
+ - unknown/unconfigured content-types
+ 4.3 Does the UA allow configuration for receipt of additional
+ content-types? If so describe the configuration procedure
+ and possibilities. (Is it complex/easy, give example
+ configuration, can you add external viewers etc.). E.g.
+ - application/wordperfect5.1
+ - application/msword
+ 4.4 Does the UA support composition of the following basic MIME
+ content types? Describe how easy/complex composition of a
+ message with a MIME content-type is.
+ - text/plain
+ - text/enriched
+ - image/gif
+ - image/jpeg
+ - audio/basic
+ - video/mpeg
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 6]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+ - application/octet-stream
+ - application/postscript
+ - message/rfc822
+ - message/partial
+ - message/external
+ - multipart/mixed
+ - multipart/parallel
+ - multipart/digest
+ - multipart/alternative
+ Does the UA generate X-<bilaterally defined> content-types
+ (when and why)
+ 4.5 Does the UA support compostion of additional content-types?
+ If so describe how to do this (configuration and/or
+ compostion), e.g.:
+ - application/wordperfect5.1
+ - application/msword
+ 4.6 What content-encodings does the UA support:
+ - 7bit
+ - quoted printable
+ - base64
+ - binary
+ - 8bit
+ - X-<bilateraly defined> (when and why)
+ 4.7 What encoding is used for the following content-types:
+ 7bit QP B64 Binary 8-bit Other
+ - text/plain
+ - text/enriched
+ - image/gif
+ - image/jpeg
+ - audio/basic
+ - video/mpeg
+ - application/octet-stream
+ - application/postscript
+ - message/rfc822
+ - message/partial
+ - message/external
+ - multipart/mixed
+ - multipart/parallel
+ - multipart/digest
+ - multipart/alternative
+ 4.8 Does the UA generate the correct Mime version header:
+ Mime-Version: 1.0
+ 4.9 In multipart messages, give an example of the sort of
+ boundary string generated.
+ 4.10 Does the UA support the use of non-ascii characters in the
+ headers (in subject, free form part of address etc.)?
+ 4.11 With the content type text/plain it is possible to have a charset
+ parameter, indicating that a specific character set is used in
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 7]
+
+RFC 1820 MIME User Agent Checklist August 1995
+
+
+ the content type text plain. What character sets (like
+ iso-8859-1) does the UA support (standard or configurable)?
+
+Security Considerations
+
+ Testing a MIME UA against this checklist involves the security risks
+ that are described in the MIME specification (RFC 1521). Most notably
+ the automatic execution of general-purpose PostScript interpreters
+ entails serious security risks. The reader is encouraged to read RFC
+ 1521 for more detail on these security risks.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Erik Huizer
+ SURFnet bv
+ P.O. Box 19035
+ 3501 DA Utrecht
+ The Netherlands
+
+ Phone: +31 30 305305
+ Fax: +31 30 305329
+ EMail: Erik.Huizer@SURFnet.nl
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Huizer Informational [Page 8]
+