diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt | 1011 |
1 files changed, 1011 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a289cff --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1011 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group C. Davis +Request for Comments: 1876 Kapor Enterprises +Updates: 1034, 1035 P. Vixie +Category: Experimental Vixie Enterprises + T. Goodwin + FORE Systems + I. Dickinson + University of Warwick + January 1996 + + + A Means for Expressing Location Information in the Domain Name System + +Status of this Memo + + This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet + community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any + kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. + Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +1. Abstract + + This memo defines a new DNS RR type for experimental purposes. This + RFC describes a mechanism to allow the DNS to carry location + information about hosts, networks, and subnets. Such information for + a small subset of hosts is currently contained in the flat-file UUCP + maps. However, just as the DNS replaced the use of HOSTS.TXT to + carry host and network address information, it is possible to replace + the UUCP maps as carriers of location information. + + This RFC defines the format of a new Resource Record (RR) for the + Domain Name System (DNS), and reserves a corresponding DNS type + mnemonic (LOC) and numerical code (29). + + This RFC assumes that the reader is familiar with the DNS [RFC 1034, + RFC 1035]. The data shown in our examples is for pedagogical use and + does not necessarily reflect the real Internet. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 1] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + +2. RDATA Format + + MSB LSB + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 0| VERSION | SIZE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 2| HORIZ PRE | VERT PRE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 4| LATITUDE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 6| LATITUDE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 8| LONGITUDE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 10| LONGITUDE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 12| ALTITUDE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + 14| ALTITUDE | + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + (octet) + +where: + +VERSION Version number of the representation. This must be zero. + Implementations are required to check this field and make + no assumptions about the format of unrecognized versions. + +SIZE The diameter of a sphere enclosing the described entity, in + centimeters, expressed as a pair of four-bit unsigned + integers, each ranging from zero to nine, with the most + significant four bits representing the base and the second + number representing the power of ten by which to multiply + the base. This allows sizes from 0e0 (<1cm) to 9e9 + (90,000km) to be expressed. This representation was chosen + such that the hexadecimal representation can be read by + eye; 0x15 = 1e5. Four-bit values greater than 9 are + undefined, as are values with a base of zero and a non-zero + exponent. + + Since 20000000m (represented by the value 0x29) is greater + than the equatorial diameter of the WGS 84 ellipsoid + (12756274m), it is therefore suitable for use as a + "worldwide" size. + +HORIZ PRE The horizontal precision of the data, in centimeters, + expressed using the same representation as SIZE. This is + the diameter of the horizontal "circle of error", rather + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 2] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + than a "plus or minus" value. (This was chosen to match + the interpretation of SIZE; to get a "plus or minus" value, + divide by 2.) + +VERT PRE The vertical precision of the data, in centimeters, + expressed using the sane representation as for SIZE. This + is the total potential vertical error, rather than a "plus + or minus" value. (This was chosen to match the + interpretation of SIZE; to get a "plus or minus" value, + divide by 2.) Note that if altitude above or below sea + level is used as an approximation for altitude relative to + the [WGS 84] ellipsoid, the precision value should be + adjusted. + +LATITUDE The latitude of the center of the sphere described by the + SIZE field, expressed as a 32-bit integer, most significant + octet first (network standard byte order), in thousandths + of a second of arc. 2^31 represents the equator; numbers + above that are north latitude. + +LONGITUDE The longitude of the center of the sphere described by the + SIZE field, expressed as a 32-bit integer, most significant + octet first (network standard byte order), in thousandths + of a second of arc, rounded away from the prime meridian. + 2^31 represents the prime meridian; numbers above that are + east longitude. + +ALTITUDE The altitude of the center of the sphere described by the + SIZE field, expressed as a 32-bit integer, most significant + octet first (network standard byte order), in centimeters, + from a base of 100,000m below the [WGS 84] reference + spheroid used by GPS (semimajor axis a=6378137.0, + reciprocal flattening rf=298.257223563). Altitude above + (or below) sea level may be used as an approximation of + altitude relative to the the [WGS 84] spheroid, though due + to the Earth's surface not being a perfect spheroid, there + will be differences. (For example, the geoid (which sea + level approximates) for the continental US ranges from 10 + meters to 50 meters below the [WGS 84] spheroid. + Adjustments to ALTITUDE and/or VERT PRE will be necessary + in most cases. The Defense Mapping Agency publishes geoid + height values relative to the [WGS 84] ellipsoid. + + + + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 3] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + +3. Master File Format + + The LOC record is expressed in a master file in the following format: + + <owner> <TTL> <class> LOC ( d1 [m1 [s1]] {"N"|"S"} d2 [m2 [s2]] + {"E"|"W"} alt["m"] [siz["m"] [hp["m"] + [vp["m"]]]] ) + + (The parentheses are used for multi-line data as specified in [RFC + 1035] section 5.1.) + + where: + + d1: [0 .. 90] (degrees latitude) + d2: [0 .. 180] (degrees longitude) + m1, m2: [0 .. 59] (minutes latitude/longitude) + s1, s2: [0 .. 59.999] (seconds latitude/longitude) + alt: [-100000.00 .. 42849672.95] BY .01 (altitude in meters) + siz, hp, vp: [0 .. 90000000.00] (size/precision in meters) + + If omitted, minutes and seconds default to zero, size defaults to 1m, + horizontal precision defaults to 10000m, and vertical precision + defaults to 10m. These defaults are chosen to represent typical + ZIP/postal code area sizes, since it is often easy to find + approximate geographical location by ZIP/postal code. + +4. Example Data + +;;; +;;; note that these data would not all appear in one zone file +;;; + +;; network LOC RR derived from ZIP data. note use of precision defaults +cambridge-net.kei.com. LOC 42 21 54 N 71 06 18 W -24m 30m + +;; higher-precision host LOC RR. note use of vertical precision default +loiosh.kei.com. LOC 42 21 43.952 N 71 5 6.344 W + -24m 1m 200m + +pipex.net. LOC 52 14 05 N 00 08 50 E 10m + +curtin.edu.au. LOC 32 7 19 S 116 2 25 E 10m + +rwy04L.logan-airport.boston. LOC 42 21 28.764 N 71 00 51.617 W + -44m 2000m + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 4] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + +5. Application use of the LOC RR + +5.1 Suggested Uses + + Some uses for the LOC RR have already been suggested, including the + USENET backbone flow maps, a "visual traceroute" application showing + the geographical path of an IP packet, and network management + applications that could use LOC RRs to generate a map of hosts and + routers being managed. + +5.2 Search Algorithms + + This section specifies how to use the DNS to translate domain names + and/or IP addresses into location information. + + If an application wishes to have a "fallback" behavior, displaying a + less precise or larger area when a host does not have an associated + LOC RR, it MAY support use of the algorithm in section 5.2.3, as + noted in sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. If fallback is desired, this + behaviour is the RECOMMENDED default, but in some cases it may need + to be modified based on the specific requirements of the application + involved. + + This search algorithm is designed to allow network administrators to + specify the location of a network or subnet without requiring LOC RR + data for each individual host. For example, a computer lab with 24 + workstations, all of which are on the same subnet and in basically + the same location, would only need a LOC RR for the subnet. + (However, if the file server's location has been more precisely + measured, a separate LOC RR for it can be placed in the DNS.) + +5.2.1 Searching by Name + + If the application is beginning with a name, rather than an IP + address (as the USENET backbone flow maps do), it MUST check for a + LOC RR associated with that name. (CNAME records should be followed + as for any other RR type.) + + If there is no LOC RR for that name, all A records (if any) + associated with the name MAY be checked for network (or subnet) LOC + RRs using the "Searching by Network or Subnet" algorithm (5.2.3). If + multiple A records exist and have associated network or subnet LOC + RRs, the application may choose to use any, some, or all of the LOC + RRs found, possibly in combination. It is suggested that multi-homed + hosts have LOC RRs for their name in the DNS to avoid any ambiguity + in these cases. + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 5] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + Note that domain names that do not have associated A records must + have a LOC RR associated with their name in order for location + information to be accessible. + +5.2.2 Searching by Address + + If the application is beginning with an IP address (as a "visual + traceroute" application might be) it MUST first map the address to a + name using the IN-ADDR.ARPA namespace (see [RFC 1034], section + 5.2.1), then check for a LOC RR associated with that name. + + If there is no LOC RR for the name, the address MAY be checked for + network (or subnet) LOC RRs using the "Searching by Network or + Subnet" algorithm (5.2.3). + +5.2.3 Searching by Network or Subnet + + Even if a host's name does not have any associated LOC RRs, the + network(s) or subnet(s) it is on may. If the application wishes to + search for such less specific data, the following algorithm SHOULD be + followed to find a network or subnet LOC RR associated with the IP + address. This algorithm is adapted slightly from that specified in + [RFC 1101], sections 4.3 and 4.4. + + Since subnet LOC RRs are (if present) more specific than network LOC + RRs, it is best to use them if available. In order to do so, we + build a stack of network and subnet names found while performing the + [RFC 1101] search, then work our way down the stack until a LOC RR is + found. + + 1. create a host-zero address using the network portion of the IP + address (one, two, or three bytes for class A, B, or C networks, + respectively). For example, for the host 128.9.2.17, on the class + B network 128.9, this would result in the address "128.9.0.0". + + 2. Reverse the octets, suffix IN-ADDR.ARPA, and query for PTR and A + records. Retrieve: + + 0.0.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. PTR isi-net.isi.edu. + A 255.255.255.0 + + Push the name "isi-net.isi.edu" onto the stack of names to be + searched for LOC RRs later. + + + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 6] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + 3. Since an A RR was found, repeat using mask from RR + (255.255.255.0), constructing a query for 0.2.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. + Retrieve: + + 0.2.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. PTR div2-subnet.isi.edu. + A 255.255.255.240 + + Push the name "div2-subnet.isi.edu" onto the stack of names to be + searched for LOC RRs later. + + 4. Since another A RR was found, repeat using mask 255.255.255.240 + (x'FFFFFFF0'), constructing a query for 16.2.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. + Retrieve: + + 16.2.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. PTR inc-subsubnet.isi.edu. + + Push the name "inc-subsubnet.isi.edu" onto the stack of names to + be searched for LOC RRs later. + + 5. Since no A RR is present at 16.2.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA., there are no + more subnet levels to search. We now pop the top name from the + stack and check for an associated LOC RR. Repeat until a LOC RR + is found. + + In this case, assume that inc-subsubnet.isi.edu does not have an + associated LOC RR, but that div2-subnet.isi.edu does. We will + then use div2-subnet.isi.edu's LOC RR as an approximation of this + host's location. (Note that even if isi-net.isi.edu has a LOC RR, + it will not be used if a subnet also has a LOC RR.) + +5.3 Applicability to non-IN Classes and non-IP Addresses + + The LOC record is defined for all RR classes, and may be used with + non-IN classes such as HS and CH. The semantics of such use are not + defined by this memo. + + The search algorithm in section 5.2.3 may be adapted to other + addressing schemes by extending [RFC 1101]'s encoding of network + names to cover those schemes. Such extensions are not defined by + this memo. + + + + + + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 7] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + +6. References + + [RFC 1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities", + STD 13, RFC 1034, USC/Information Sciences Institute, + November 1987. + + [RFC 1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and + Specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, USC/Information Sciences + Institute, November 1987. + + [RFC 1101] Mockapetris, P., "DNS Encoding of Network Names and Other + Types", RFC 1101, USC/Information Sciences Institute, + April 1989. + + [WGS 84] United States Department of Defense; DoD WGS-1984 - Its + Definition and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems; + Washington, D.C.; 1985; Report AD-A188 815 DMA; 6127; 7-R- + 138-R; CV, KV; + +7. Security Considerations + + High-precision LOC RR information could be used to plan a penetration + of physical security, leading to potential denial-of-machine attacks. + To avoid any appearance of suggesting this method to potential + attackers, we declined the opportunity to name this RR "ICBM". + +8. Authors' Addresses + + The authors as a group can be reached as <loc@pipex.net>. + + Christopher Davis + Kapor Enterprises, Inc. + 238 Main Street, Suite 400 + Cambridge, MA 02142 + + Phone: +1 617 576 4532 + EMail: ckd@kei.com + + + Paul Vixie + Vixie Enterprises + Star Route Box 159A + Woodside, CA 94062 + + Phone: +1 415 747 0204 + EMail: paul@vix.com + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 8] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + Tim Goodwin + Public IP Exchange Ltd (PIPEX) + 216 The Science Park + Cambridge CB4 4WA + UK + + Phone: +44 1223 250250 + EMail: tim@pipex.net + + + Ian Dickinson + FORE Systems + 2475 The Crescent + Solihull Parkway + Birmingham Business Park + B37 7YE + UK + + Phone: +44 121 717 4444 + EMail: idickins@fore.co.uk + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 9] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + +Appendix A: Sample Conversion Routines + +/* + * routines to convert between on-the-wire RR format and zone file + * format. Does not contain conversion to/from decimal degrees; + * divide or multiply by 60*60*1000 for that. + */ + +static unsigned int poweroften[10] = {1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000, + 1000000,10000000,100000000,1000000000}; + +/* takes an XeY precision/size value, returns a string representation.*/ +static const char * +precsize_ntoa(prec) + u_int8_t prec; +{ + static char retbuf[sizeof("90000000.00")]; + unsigned long val; + int mantissa, exponent; + + mantissa = (int)((prec >> 4) & 0x0f) % 10; + exponent = (int)((prec >> 0) & 0x0f) % 10; + + val = mantissa * poweroften[exponent]; + + (void) sprintf(retbuf,"%d.%.2d", val/100, val%100); + return (retbuf); +} + +/* converts ascii size/precision X * 10**Y(cm) to 0xXY. moves pointer.*/ +static u_int8_t +precsize_aton(strptr) + char **strptr; +{ + unsigned int mval = 0, cmval = 0; + u_int8_t retval = 0; + register char *cp; + register int exponent; + register int mantissa; + + cp = *strptr; + + while (isdigit(*cp)) + mval = mval * 10 + (*cp++ - '0'); + + if (*cp == '.') { /* centimeters */ + cp++; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 10] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + cmval = (*cp++ - '0') * 10; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + cmval += (*cp++ - '0'); + } + } + } + cmval = (mval * 100) + cmval; + + for (exponent = 0; exponent < 9; exponent++) + if (cmval < poweroften[exponent+1]) + break; + + mantissa = cmval / poweroften[exponent]; + if (mantissa > 9) + mantissa = 9; + + retval = (mantissa << 4) | exponent; + + *strptr = cp; + + return (retval); +} + +/* converts ascii lat/lon to unsigned encoded 32-bit number. + * moves pointer. */ +static u_int32_t +latlon2ul(latlonstrptr,which) + char **latlonstrptr; + int *which; +{ + register char *cp; + u_int32_t retval; + int deg = 0, min = 0, secs = 0, secsfrac = 0; + + cp = *latlonstrptr; + + while (isdigit(*cp)) + deg = deg * 10 + (*cp++ - '0'); + + while (isspace(*cp)) + cp++; + + if (!(isdigit(*cp))) + goto fndhemi; + + while (isdigit(*cp)) + min = min * 10 + (*cp++ - '0'); + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 11] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + while (isspace(*cp)) + cp++; + + if (!(isdigit(*cp))) + goto fndhemi; + + while (isdigit(*cp)) + secs = secs * 10 + (*cp++ - '0'); + + if (*cp == '.') { /* decimal seconds */ + cp++; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + secsfrac = (*cp++ - '0') * 100; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + secsfrac += (*cp++ - '0') * 10; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + secsfrac += (*cp++ - '0'); + } + } + } + } + + while (!isspace(*cp)) /* if any trailing garbage */ + cp++; + + while (isspace(*cp)) + cp++; + + fndhemi: + switch (*cp) { + case 'N': case 'n': + case 'E': case 'e': + retval = ((unsigned)1<<31) + + (((((deg * 60) + min) * 60) + secs) * 1000) + + secsfrac; + break; + case 'S': case 's': + case 'W': case 'w': + retval = ((unsigned)1<<31) + - (((((deg * 60) + min) * 60) + secs) * 1000) + - secsfrac; + break; + default: + retval = 0; /* invalid value -- indicates error */ + break; + } + + switch (*cp) { + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 12] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + case 'N': case 'n': + case 'S': case 's': + *which = 1; /* latitude */ + break; + case 'E': case 'e': + case 'W': case 'w': + *which = 2; /* longitude */ + break; + default: + *which = 0; /* error */ + break; + } + + cp++; /* skip the hemisphere */ + + while (!isspace(*cp)) /* if any trailing garbage */ + cp++; + + while (isspace(*cp)) /* move to next field */ + cp++; + + *latlonstrptr = cp; + + return (retval); +} + +/* converts a zone file representation in a string to an RDATA + * on-the-wire representation. */ +u_int32_t +loc_aton(ascii, binary) + const char *ascii; + u_char *binary; +{ + const char *cp, *maxcp; + u_char *bcp; + + u_int32_t latit = 0, longit = 0, alt = 0; + u_int32_t lltemp1 = 0, lltemp2 = 0; + int altmeters = 0, altfrac = 0, altsign = 1; + u_int8_t hp = 0x16; /* default = 1e6 cm = 10000.00m = 10km */ + u_int8_t vp = 0x13; /* default = 1e3 cm = 10.00m */ + u_int8_t siz = 0x12; /* default = 1e2 cm = 1.00m */ + int which1 = 0, which2 = 0; + + cp = ascii; + maxcp = cp + strlen(ascii); + + lltemp1 = latlon2ul(&cp, &which1); + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 13] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + lltemp2 = latlon2ul(&cp, &which2); + + switch (which1 + which2) { + case 3: /* 1 + 2, the only valid combination */ + if ((which1 == 1) && (which2 == 2)) { /* normal case */ + latit = lltemp1; + longit = lltemp2; + } else if ((which1 == 2) && (which2 == 1)) {/*reversed*/ + longit = lltemp1; + latit = lltemp2; + } else { /* some kind of brokenness */ + return 0; + } + break; + default: /* we didn't get one of each */ + return 0; + } + + /* altitude */ + if (*cp == '-') { + altsign = -1; + cp++; + } + + if (*cp == '+') + cp++; + + while (isdigit(*cp)) + altmeters = altmeters * 10 + (*cp++ - '0'); + + if (*cp == '.') { /* decimal meters */ + cp++; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + altfrac = (*cp++ - '0') * 10; + if (isdigit(*cp)) { + altfrac += (*cp++ - '0'); + } + } + } + + alt = (10000000 + (altsign * (altmeters * 100 + altfrac))); + + while (!isspace(*cp) && (cp < maxcp)) + /* if trailing garbage or m */ + cp++; + + while (isspace(*cp) && (cp < maxcp)) + cp++; + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 14] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + if (cp >= maxcp) + goto defaults; + + siz = precsize_aton(&cp); + + while (!isspace(*cp) && (cp < maxcp))/*if trailing garbage or m*/ + cp++; + + while (isspace(*cp) && (cp < maxcp)) + cp++; + + if (cp >= maxcp) + goto defaults; + + hp = precsize_aton(&cp); + + while (!isspace(*cp) && (cp < maxcp))/*if trailing garbage or m*/ + cp++; + + while (isspace(*cp) && (cp < maxcp)) + cp++; + + if (cp >= maxcp) + goto defaults; + + vp = precsize_aton(&cp); + + defaults: + + bcp = binary; + *bcp++ = (u_int8_t) 0; /* version byte */ + *bcp++ = siz; + *bcp++ = hp; + *bcp++ = vp; + PUTLONG(latit,bcp); + PUTLONG(longit,bcp); + PUTLONG(alt,bcp); + + return (16); /* size of RR in octets */ +} + +/* takes an on-the-wire LOC RR and prints it in zone file + * (human readable) format. */ +char * +loc_ntoa(binary,ascii) + const u_char *binary; + char *ascii; +{ + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 15] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + static char tmpbuf[255*3]; + + register char *cp; + register const u_char *rcp; + + int latdeg, latmin, latsec, latsecfrac; + int longdeg, longmin, longsec, longsecfrac; + char northsouth, eastwest; + int altmeters, altfrac, altsign; + + const int referencealt = 100000 * 100; + + int32_t latval, longval, altval; + u_int32_t templ; + u_int8_t sizeval, hpval, vpval, versionval; + + char *sizestr, *hpstr, *vpstr; + + rcp = binary; + if (ascii) + cp = ascii; + else { + cp = tmpbuf; + } + + versionval = *rcp++; + + if (versionval) { + sprintf(cp,"; error: unknown LOC RR version"); + return (cp); + } + + sizeval = *rcp++; + + hpval = *rcp++; + vpval = *rcp++; + + GETLONG(templ,rcp); + latval = (templ - ((unsigned)1<<31)); + + GETLONG(templ,rcp); + longval = (templ - ((unsigned)1<<31)); + + GETLONG(templ,rcp); + if (templ < referencealt) { /* below WGS 84 spheroid */ + altval = referencealt - templ; + altsign = -1; + } else { + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 16] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + altval = templ - referencealt; + altsign = 1; + } + + if (latval < 0) { + northsouth = 'S'; + latval = -latval; + } + else + northsouth = 'N'; + + latsecfrac = latval % 1000; + latval = latval / 1000; + latsec = latval % 60; + latval = latval / 60; + latmin = latval % 60; + latval = latval / 60; + latdeg = latval; + + if (longval < 0) { + eastwest = 'W'; + longval = -longval; + } + else + eastwest = 'E'; + + longsecfrac = longval % 1000; + longval = longval / 1000; + longsec = longval % 60; + longval = longval / 60; + longmin = longval % 60; + longval = longval / 60; + longdeg = longval; + + altfrac = altval % 100; + altmeters = (altval / 100) * altsign; + + sizestr = savestr(precsize_ntoa(sizeval)); + hpstr = savestr(precsize_ntoa(hpval)); + vpstr = savestr(precsize_ntoa(vpval)); + + sprintf(cp, + "%d %.2d %.2d.%.3d %c %d %.2d %.2d.%.3d %c %d.%.2dm + %sm %sm %sm", + latdeg, latmin, latsec, latsecfrac, northsouth, + longdeg, longmin, longsec, longsecfrac, eastwest, + altmeters, altfrac, sizestr, hpstr, vpstr); + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 17] + +RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS January 1996 + + + free(sizestr); + free(hpstr); + free(vpstr); + + return (cp); +} + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Davis, et al Experimental [Page 18] + |