diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc204.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc204.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc204.txt | 59 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4a690fc --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group Jon Postel +Request for Comments: 204 ULA-NMC +NIC 7196 Comp. Sci. +Categories A.5, C.3, D 5 August 71 +Obsoletes: none +Related 196 + + + Sockets in use + + I would like to collect information on the use of socket numbers +for "standard" service programs. For example Loggers (telnet servers) +Listen on socket 1. What sockets at your host are Listened to by what +programs? + + Recently Dick Watson suggested assigning socket 5 for use by a +mail-box protocol (RFC196). Does any one object ? Are there any +suggestions for a method of assigning sockets to standard programs? +Should a subset of the socket numbers be reserved for use by future +standard protocols? + + Please phone or mail your answers and commtents to: + + Jon Postel + The SPADE Group + 3732 Boelter Hall + Computer Science Dept. + ULA, LA. CA 90024 + + (213) 825 2368 + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Gruss Gottfried 6/97 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Crocker [Page 1] + |