summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc204.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc204.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc204.txt59
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4a690fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc204.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group Jon Postel
+Request for Comments: 204 ULA-NMC
+NIC 7196 Comp. Sci.
+Categories A.5, C.3, D 5 August 71
+Obsoletes: none
+Related 196
+
+
+ Sockets in use
+
+ I would like to collect information on the use of socket numbers
+for "standard" service programs. For example Loggers (telnet servers)
+Listen on socket 1. What sockets at your host are Listened to by what
+programs?
+
+ Recently Dick Watson suggested assigning socket 5 for use by a
+mail-box protocol (RFC196). Does any one object ? Are there any
+suggestions for a method of assigning sockets to standard programs?
+Should a subset of the socket numbers be reserved for use by future
+standard protocols?
+
+ Please phone or mail your answers and commtents to:
+
+ Jon Postel
+ The SPADE Group
+ 3732 Boelter Hall
+ Computer Science Dept.
+ ULA, LA. CA 90024
+
+ (213) 825 2368
+
+ [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+ [ into the online RFC archives by Gruss Gottfried 6/97 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Crocker [Page 1]
+