summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt843
1 files changed, 843 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e2002fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc2370.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,843 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group R. Coltun
+Request for Comments: 2370 FORE Systems
+See Also: 2328 July 1998
+Category: Standards Track
+
+
+ The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
+
+Table Of Contents
+
+ 1.0 Abstract ................................................. 1
+ 2.0 Overview ................................................. 2
+ 2.1 Organization Of This Document ............................ 2
+ 2.2 Acknowledgments .......................................... 3
+ 3.0 The Opaque LSA ........................................... 3
+ 3.1 Flooding Opaque LSAs ..................................... 4
+ 3.2 Modifications To The Neighbor State Machine .............. 5
+ 4.0 Protocol Data Structures ................................. 6
+ 4.1 Additions To The OSPF Neighbor Structure ................. 6
+ 5.0 Management Considerations ................................ 7
+ 6.0 Security Considerations .................................. 9
+ 7.0 IANA Considerations ...................................... 10
+ 8.0 References ............................................... 10
+ 9.0 Author's Information ..................................... 11
+ Appendix A: OSPF Data Formats ................................ 12
+ A.1 The Options Field ........................................ 12
+ A.2 The Opaque LSA ........................................... 13
+ Appendix B: Full Copyright Statment .......................... 15
+
+1.0 Abstract
+
+ This memo defines enhancements to the OSPF protocol to support a new
+ class of link-state advertisements (LSA) called Opaque LSAs. Opaque
+ LSAs provide a generalized mechanism to allow for the future
+ extensibility of OSPF. Opaque LSAs consist of a standard LSA header
+ followed by application-specific information. The information field
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ may be used directly by OSPF or by other applications. Standard OSPF
+ link-state database flooding mechanisms are used to distribute Opaque
+ LSAs to all or some limited portion of the OSPF topology.
+
+2.0 Overview
+
+ Over the last several years the OSPF routing protocol [OSPF] has been
+ widely deployed throughout the Internet. As a result of this
+ deployment and the evolution of networking technology, OSPF has been
+ extended to support many options; this evolution will obviously
+ continue.
+
+ This memo defines enhancements to the OSPF protocol to support a new
+ class of link-state advertisements (LSA) called Opaque LSAs. Opaque
+ LSAs provide a generalized mechanism to allow for the future
+ extensibility of OSPF. The information contained in Opaque LSAs may
+ be used directly by OSPF or indirectly by some application wishing to
+ distribute information throughout the OSPF domain. For example, the
+ OSPF LSA may be used by routers to distribute IP to link-layer
+ address resolution information (see [ARA] for more information). The
+ exact use of Opaque LSAs is beyond the scope of this memo.
+
+ Opaque LSAs consist of a standard LSA header followed by a 32-bit
+ qaligned application-specific information field. Like any other LSA,
+ the Opaque LSA uses the link-state database distribution mechanism
+ for flooding this information throughout the topology. The link-
+ state type field of the Opaque LSA identifies the LSA's range of
+ topological distribution. This range is referred to as the Flooding
+ Scope.
+
+ It is envisioned that an implementation of the Opaque option provides
+ an application interface for 1) encapsulating application-specific
+ information in a specific Opaque type, 2) sending and receiving
+ application-specific information, and 3) if required, informing the
+ application of the change in validity of previously received
+ information when topological changes are detected.
+
+2.1 Organization Of This Document
+
+ This document first defines the three types of Opaque LSAs followed
+ by a description of OSPF packet processing. The packet processing
+ sections include modifications to the flooding procedure and to the
+ neighbor state machine. Appendix A then gives the packet formats.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+2.2 Acknowledgments
+
+ The author would like to thank Dennis Ferguson, Acee Lindem, John
+ Moy, Sandra Murphy, Man-Kit Yeung, Zhaohui "Jeffrey" Zhang and the
+ rest of the OSPF Working Group for the ideas and support they have
+ given to this project.
+
+3.0 The Opaque LSA
+
+ Opaque LSAs are types 9, 10 and 11 link-state advertisements. Opaque
+ LSAs consist of a standard LSA header followed by a 32-bit aligned
+ application-specific information field. Standard link-state database
+ flooding mechanisms are used for distribution of Opaque LSAs. The
+ range of topological distribution (i.e., the flooding scope) of an
+ Opaque LSA is identified by its link-state type. This section
+ documents the flooding of Opaque LSAs.
+
+ The flooding scope associated with each Opaque link-state type is
+ defined as follows.
+
+ o Link-state type 9 denotes a link-local scope. Type-9 Opaque
+ LSAs are not flooded beyond the local (sub)network.
+
+ o Link-state type 10 denotes an area-local scope. Type-10 Opaque
+ LSAs are not flooded beyond the borders of their associated area.
+
+ o Link-state type 11 denotes that the LSA is flooded throughout
+ the Autonomous System (AS). The flooding scope of type-11
+ LSAs are equivalent to the flooding scope of AS-external (type-5)
+ LSAs. Specifically type-11 Opaque LSAs are 1) flooded throughout
+ all transit areas, 2) not flooded into stub areas from the
+ backbone and 3) not originated by routers into their connected
+ stub areas. As with type-5 LSAs, if a type-11 Opaque LSA is
+ received in a stub area from a neighboring router within the
+ stub area the LSA is rejected.
+
+ The link-state ID of the Opaque LSA is divided into an Opaque type
+ field (the first 8 bits) and a type-specific ID (the remaining 24
+ bits). The packet format of the Opaque LSA is given in Appendix A.
+ Section 7.0 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
+
+ The responsibility for proper handling of the Opaque LSA's flooding
+ scope is placed on both the sender and receiver of the LSA. The
+ receiver must always store a valid received Opaque LSA in its link-
+ state database. The receiver must not accept Opaque LSAs that
+ violate the flooding scope (e.g., a type-11 (domain-wide) Opaque LSA
+ is not accepted in a stub area). The flooding scope effects both the
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ synchronization of the link-state database and the flooding
+ procedure.
+
+ The following describes the modifications to these procedures that
+ are necessary to insure conformance to the Opaque LSA's Scoping
+ Rules.
+
+3.1 Flooding Opaque LSAs
+
+ The flooding of Opaque LSAs must follow the rules of Flooding Scope
+ as specified in this section. Section 13 of [OSPF] describes the
+ OSPF flooding procedure. The following describes the Opaque LSA's
+ type-specific flooding restrictions.
+
+ o If the Opaque LSA is type 9 (the flooding scope is link-local)
+ and the interface that the LSA was received on is not the same as
+ the target interface (e.g., the interface associated with a
+ particular target neighbor), the Opaque LSA must not be flooded
+ out that interface (or to that neighbor). An implementation
+ should keepk track of the IP interface associated with each
+ Opaque LSA having a link-local flooding scope.
+
+ o If the Opaque LSA is type 10 (the flooding scope is area-local)
+ and the area associated with Opaque LSA (upon reception) is not
+ the same as the area associated with the target interface, the
+ Opaque LSA must not be flooded out the interface. An
+ implementation should keep track of the OSPF area associated
+ with each Opaque LSA having an area-local flooding scope.
+
+ o If the Opaque LSA is type 11 (the LSA is flooded throughout the
+ AS) and the target interface is associated with a stub area the
+ Opaque LSA must not be flooded out the interface. A type-11
+ Opaque LSA that is received on an interface associated with a
+ stub area must be discarded and not acknowledged (the
+ neighboring router has flooded the LSA in error).
+
+ When opaque-capable routers and non-opaque-capable OSPF routers are
+ mixed together in a routing domain, the Opaque LSAs are not flooded
+ to the non-opaque-capable routers. As a general design principle,
+ optional OSPF advertisements are only flooded to those routers that
+ understand them.
+
+ An opaque-capable router learns of its neighbor's opaque capability
+ at the beginning of the "Database Exchange Process" (see Section 10.6
+ of [OSPF], receiving Database Description packets from a neighbor in
+ state ExStart). A neighbor is opaque-capable if and only if it sets
+ the O-bit in the Options field of its Database Description packets;
+ the O-bit is not set in packets other than Database Description
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ packets. Then, in the next step of the Database Exchange process,
+ Opaque LSAs are included in the Database summary list that is sent to
+ the neighbor (see Sections 3.2 below and 10.3 of [OSPF]) if and only
+ if the neighbor is opaque capable.
+
+ When flooding Opaque-LSAs to adjacent neighbors, a opaque-capable
+ router looks at the neighbor's opaque capability. Opaque LSAs are
+ only flooded to opaque-capable neighbors. To be more precise, in
+ Section 13.3 of [OSPF], Opaque LSAs are only placed on the link-state
+ retransmission lists of opaque-capable neighbors. However, when send
+ ing Link State Update packets as multicasts, a non-opaque-capable
+ neighbor may (inadvertently) receive Opaque LSAs. The non-opaque-
+ capable router will then simply discard the LSA (see Section 13 of
+ [OSPF], receiving LSAs having unknown LS types).
+
+3.2 Modifications To The Neighbor State Machine
+
+ The state machine as it exists in section 10.3 of [OSPF] remains
+ unchanged except for the action associated with State: ExStart,
+ Event: NegotiationDone which is where the Database summary list is
+ built. To incorporate the Opaque LSA in OSPF this action is changed
+ to the following.
+
+ State(s): ExStart
+
+ Event: NegotiationDone
+
+ New state: Exchange
+
+ Action: The router must list the contents of its entire area
+ link-state database in the neighbor Database summary
+ list. The area link-state database consists of the
+ Router LSAs, Network LSAs, Summary LSAs and types 9 and
+ 10 Opaque LSAs contained in the area structure, along
+ with AS External and type-11 Opaque LSAs contained in
+ the global structure. AS External and type-11 Opaque
+ LSAs are omitted from a virtual neighbor's Database
+ summary list. AS External LSAs and type-11 Opaque LSAs
+ are omitted from the Database summary list if the area
+ has been configured as a stub area (see Section 3.6 of
+ [OSPF]).
+
+ Type-9 Opaque LSAs are omitted from the Database summary
+ list if the interface associated with the neighbor is
+ not the interface associated with the Opaque LSA (as
+ noted upon reception).
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ Any advertisement whose age is equal to MaxAge is
+ omitted from the Database summary list. It is instead
+ added to the neighbor's link-state retransmission list.
+ A summary of the Database summary list will be sent to
+ the neighbor in Database Description packets. Each
+ Database Description Packet has a DD sequence number,
+ and is explicitly acknowledged. Only one Database
+ Description Packet is allowed to be outstanding at any
+ one time. For more detail on the sending and receiving
+ of Database Description packets, see Sections 10.6 and
+ 10.8 of [OSPF].
+
+4.0 Protocol Data Structures
+
+ The Opaque option is described herein in terms of its operation on
+ various protocol data structures. These data structures are included
+ for explanatory uses only, and are not intended to constrain an
+ implementation. In addition to the data structures listed below, this
+ specification references the various data structures (e.g., OSPF
+ neighbors) defined in [OSPF].
+
+ In an OSPF router, the following item is added to the list of global
+ OSPF data structures described in Section 5 of [OSPF]:
+
+ o Opaque capability. Indicates whether the router is running the
+ Opaque option (i.e., capable of storing Opaque LSAs). Such a
+ router will continue to inter-operate with non-opaque-capable
+ OSPF routers.
+
+4.1 Additions To The OSPF Neighbor Structure
+
+ The OSPF neighbor structure is defined in Section 10 of [OSPF]. In
+ an opaque-capable router, the following items are added to the OSPF
+ neighbor structure:
+
+ o Neighbor Options. This field was already defined in the OSPF
+ specification. However, in opaque-capable routers there is a new
+ option which indicates the neighbor's Opaque capability. This new
+ option is learned in the Database Exchange process through
+ reception of the neighbor's Database Description packets, and
+ determines whether Opaque LSAs are flooded to the neighbor. For a
+ more detailed explanation of the flooding of the Opaque LSA see
+ section 3 of this document.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 6]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+5.0 Management Considerations
+
+ This section identifies the current OSPF MIB [OSPFMIB] capabilities
+ that are applicable to the Opaque option and lists the additional
+ management information which is required for its support.
+
+ Opaque LSAs are types 9, 10 and 11 link-state advertisements. The
+ link-state ID of the Opaque LSA is divided into an Opaque type field
+ (the first 8 bits) and a type-specific ID (the remaining 24 bits).
+ The packet format of the Opaque LSA is given in Appendix A. The
+ range of topological distribution (i.e., the flooding scope) of an
+ Opaque LSA is identified by its link-state type.
+
+ o Link-State type 9 Opaque LSAs have a link-local scope. Type-9
+ Opaque LSAs are flooded on a single local (sub)network but are
+ not flooded beyond the local (sub)network.
+
+ o Link-state type 10 Opaque LSAs have an area-local scope. Type-10
+ Opaque LSAs are flooded throughout a single area but are not
+ flooded beyond the borders of the associated area.
+
+ o Link-state type 11 Opaque LSAs have an Autonomous-System-wide
+ scope. The flooding scope of type-11 LSAs are equivalent to the
+ flooding scope of AS-external (type-5) LSAs.
+
+ The OSPF MIB provides a number of objects that can be used to manage
+ and monitor an OSPF router's Link-State Database. The ones that are
+ relevant to the Opaque option are as follows.
+
+ The ospfGeneralGroup defines two objects for keeping track of newly
+ originated and newly received LSAs (ospfOriginateNewLsas and
+ ospfRxNewLsas respectively).
+
+ The OSPF MIB defines a set of optional traps. The ospfOriginateLsa
+ trap signifies that a new LSA has been originated by a router and
+ the ospfMaxAgeLsa trap signifies that one of the LSAs in the
+ router's link-state database has aged to MaxAge.
+
+ The ospfAreaTable describes the configured parameters and
+ cumulative statistics of the router's attached areas. This table
+ includes a count of the number of LSAs contained in the area's
+ link-state database (ospfAreaLsaCount), and a sum of the LSA's LS
+ checksums contained in this area (ospfAreaLsaCksumSum). This sum
+ can be used to determine if there has been a change in a router's
+ link-state database, and to compare the link-state database of two
+ routers.
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 7]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ The ospfLsdbTable describes the OSPF Process's link-state database
+ (excluding AS-external LSAs). Entries in this table are indexed
+ with an Area ID, a link-state type, a link-state ID and the
+ originating router's Router ID.
+
+ The management objects that are needed to support the Opaque option
+ are as follows.
+
+ An Opaque-option-enabled object is needed to indicate if the Opaque
+ option is enabled on the router.
+
+ The origination and reception of new Opaque LSAs should be
+ reflected in the counters ospfOriginateNewLsas and ospfRxNewLsas
+ (inclusive for types 9, 10 and 11 Opaque LSAs).
+
+ If the OSPF trap option is supported, the origination of new Opaque
+ LSAs and purging of MaxAge Opaque LSAs should be reflected in the
+ ospfOriginateLsa and ospfMaxAgeLsa traps (inclusive for types 9, 10
+ and 11 Opaque LSAs).
+
+ The number of type-10 Opaque LSAs should be reflected in
+ ospfAreaLsaCount; the checksums of type-10 Opaque LSAs should be
+ included in ospfAreaLsaChksumSum.
+
+ Type-10 Opaque LSAs should be included in the ospfLsdbTable. Note
+ that this table does not include a method of examining the Opaque
+ type field (in the Opaque option this is a sub-field of the link-
+ state ID).
+
+ Up until now, LSAs have not had a link-local scope so there is no
+ method of requesting the number of, or examining the LSAs that are
+ associated with a specific OSPF interface. A new group of
+ management objects are required to support type-9 Opaque LSAs.
+ These objects should include a count of type-9 Opaque LSAs, a
+ checksum sum and a table for displaying the link-state database for
+ type-9 Opaque LSAs on a per-interface basis. Entries in this table
+ should be indexed with an Area ID, interface's IP address, Opaque
+ type, link-state ID and the originating router's Router ID.
+
+ Prior to the introduction of type-11 Opaque LSAs, AS-External
+ (type-5) LSAs have been the only link-state types which have an
+ Autonomous-System-wide scope. A new group of objects are required
+ to support type-11 Opaque LSAs. These objects should include a
+ count of type-11 Opaque LSAs, a type-11 checksum sum and a table
+ for displaying the type-11 link-state database. Entries in this
+ table should be indexed with the Opaque type, link-state ID and the
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 8]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ originating router's Router ID. The type-11 link-state database
+ table will allow type-11 LSAs to be displayed once for the router
+ rather than once in each non-stub area.
+
+6.0 Security Considerations
+
+ There are two types of issues that need be addressed when looking at
+ protecting routing protocols from misconfigurations and malicious
+ attacks. The first is authentication and certification of routing
+ protocol information. The second is denial of service attacks
+ resulting from repetitive origination of the same router
+ advertisement or origination a large number of distinct
+ advertisements resulting in database overflow. Note that both of
+ these concerns exist independently of a router's support for the
+ Opaque option.
+
+ To address the authentication concerns, OSPF protocol exchanges are
+ authenticated. OSPF supports multiple types of authentication; the
+ type of authentication in use can be configured on a per network
+ segment basis. One of OSPF's authentication types, namely the
+ Cryptographic authentication option, is believed to be secure against
+ passive attacks and provide significant protection against active
+ attacks. When using the Cryptographic authentication option, each
+ router appends a "message digest" to its transmitted OSPF packets.
+ Receivers then use the shared secret key and received digest to
+ verify that each received OSPF packet is authentic.
+
+ The quality of the security provided by the Cryptographic
+ authentication option depends completely on the strength of the
+ message digest algorithm (MD5 is currently the only message digest
+ algorithm specified), the strength of the key being used, and the
+ correct implementation of the security mechanism in all communicating
+ OSPF implementations. It also requires that all parties maintain the
+ secrecy of the shared secret key. None of the standard OSPF
+ authentication types provide confidentiality. Nor do they protect
+ against traffic analysis. For more information on the standard OSPF
+ security mechanisms, see Sections 8.1, 8.2, and Appendix D of [OSPF].
+
+ [DIGI] describes the extensions to OSPF required to add digital
+ signature authentication to Link State data and to provide a
+ certification mechanism for router data. [DIGI] also describes the
+ added LSA processing and key management as well as a method for
+ migration from, or co-existence with, standard OSPF V2.
+
+ Repetitive origination of advertisements are addressed by OSPF by
+ mandating a limit on the frequency that new instances of any
+ particular LSA can be originated and accepted during the flooding
+ procedure. The frequency at which new LSA instances may be
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 9]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ originated is set equal to once every MinLSInterval seconds, whose
+ value is 5 seconds (see Section 12.4 of [OSPF]). The frequency at
+ which new LSA instances are accepted during flooding is once every
+ MinLSArrival seconds, whose value is set to 1 (see Section 13,
+ Appendix B and G.5 of [OSPF]).
+
+ Proper operation of the OSPF protocol requires that all OSPF routers
+ maintain an identical copy of the OSPF link-state database. However,
+ when the size of the link-state database becomes very large, some
+ routers may be unable to keep the entire database due to resource
+ shortages; we term this "database overflow". When database overflow
+ is anticipated, the routers with limited resources can be
+ accommodated by configuring OSPF stub areas and NSSAs. [OVERFLOW]
+ details a way of gracefully handling unanticipated database
+ overflows.
+
+7.0 IANA Considerations
+
+ Opaque types are maintained by the IANA. Extensions to OSPF which
+ require a new Opaque type must be reviewed by the OSPF working group.
+ In the event that the OSPF working group has disbanded the review
+ shall be performed by a recommended Designated Expert.
+
+ Following the policies outlined in [IANA], Opaque type values in the
+ range of 0-127 are allocated through an IETF Consensus action and
+ Opaque type values in the range of 128-255 are reserved for private
+ and experimental use.
+
+8.0 References
+
+ [ARA] Coltun, R., and J. Heinanen, "The OSPF Address Resolution
+ Advertisement Option", Work in Progress.
+
+ [DEMD] Moy, J., "Extending OSPF to Support Demand Circuits", RFC
+ 1793, April 1995.
+
+ [DIGI] Murphy, S., Badger, M., and B. Wellington, "OSPF with Digital
+ Signatures", RFC 2154, June 1997.
+
+ [IANA] Narten, T., and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
+ Considerations Section in RFCs", Work in Progress.
+
+ [MOSPF] Moy, J., "Multicast Extensions to OSPF", RFC 1584, March
+ 1994.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 10]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ [NSSA] Coltun, R., and V. Fuller, "The OSPF NSSA Option", RFC 1587,
+ March 1994.
+
+ [OSPF] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, April 1998.
+
+ [OSPFMIB] Baker, F., and R. Coltun, "OSPF Version 2 Management
+ Information Base", RFC 1850, November 1995.
+
+ [OVERFLOW] Moy, J., "OSPF Database Overflow", RFC 1765,
+ March 1995.
+
+9.0 Author's Information
+
+ Rob Coltun
+ FORE Systems
+
+ Phone: (703) 245-4543
+ EMail: rcoltun@fore.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 11]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+Appendix A: OSPF Data formats
+
+ This appendix describes the format of the Options Field followed by
+ the packet format of the Opaque LSA.
+
+A.1 The Options Field
+
+ The OSPF Options field is present in OSPF Hello packets, Database
+ Description packets and all link-state advertisements. The Options
+ field enables OSPF routers to support (or not support) optional
+ capabilities, and to communicate their capability level to other OSPF
+ routers. Through this mechanism routers of differing capabilities can
+ be mixed within an OSPF routing domain.
+
+ When used in Hello packets, the Options field allows a router to
+ reject a neighbor because of a capability mismatch. Alternatively,
+ when capabilities are exchanged in Database Description packets a
+ router can choose not to forward certain link-state advertisements to
+ a neighbor because of its reduced functionality. Lastly, listing
+ capabilities in link-state advertisements allows routers to forward
+ traffic around reduced functionality routers by excluding them from
+ parts of the routing table calculation.
+
+ Six bits of the OSPF Options field have been assigned, although only
+ the O-bit is described completely by this memo. Each bit is
+ described briefly below. Routers should reset (i.e., clear)
+ unrecognized bits in the Options field when sending Hello packets or
+ Database Description packets and when originating link-state
+ advertisements. Conversely, routers encountering unrecognized Option
+ bits in received Hello Packets, Database Description packets or
+ link-state advertisements should ignore the capability and process
+ the packet/advertisement normally.
+
+
+ +------------------------------------+
+ | * | O | DC | EA | N/P | MC | E | * |
+ +------------------------------------+
+
+ The Options Field
+
+ E-bit
+ This bit describes the way AS-external-LSAs are flooded, as
+ described in Sections 3.6, 9.5, 10.8 and 12.1.2 of [OSPF].
+
+ MC-bit
+ This bit describes whether IP multicast datagrams are forwarded
+ according to the specifications in [MOSPF].
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 12]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ N/P-bit
+ This bit describes the handling of Type-7 LSAs, as specified in
+ [NSSA].
+
+ DC-bit
+ This bit describes the router's handling of demand circuits, as
+ specified in [DEMD].
+
+ EA-bit
+ This bit describes the router's willingness to receive and
+ forward External-Attributes-LSAs, as specified in [EAL].
+
+
+ O-bit
+ This bit describes the router's willingness to receive and
+ forward Opaque-LSAs as specified in this document.
+
+A.2 The Opaque LSA
+
+ Opaque LSAs are Type 9, 10 and 11 link-state advertisements. These
+ advertisements may be used directly by OSPF or indirectly by some
+ application wishing to distribute information throughout the OSPF
+ domain. The function of the Opaque LSA option is to provide for
+ future extensibility of OSPF.
+
+ Opaque LSAs contain some number of octets (of application-specific
+ data) padded to 32-bit alignment. Like any other LSA, the Opaque LSA
+ uses the link-state database distribution mechanism for flooding this
+ information throughout the topology. However, the Opaque LSA has a
+ flooding scope associated with it so that the scope of flooding may
+ be link-local (type 9), area-local (type 10) or the entire OSPF
+ routing domain (type 11). Section 3 of this document describes the
+ flooding procedures for the Opaque LSA.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 13]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | LS age | Options | 9, 10 or 11 |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | Opaque Type | Opaque ID |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | Advertising Router |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | LS Sequence Number |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | LS checksum | Length |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | |
+ + +
+ | Opaque Information |
+ + +
+ | ... |
+
+
+ Link-State Type
+
+ The link-state type of the Opaque LSA identifies the LSA's range of
+ topological distribution. This range is referred to as the Flooding
+ Scope. The following explains the flooding scope of each of the
+ link-state types.
+
+ o A value of 9 denotes a link-local scope. Opaque LSAs with a
+ link-local scope are not flooded beyond the local (sub)network.
+
+
+ o A value of 10 denotes an area-local scope. Opaque LSAs with a
+ area-local scope are not flooded beyond the area that they are
+ originated into.
+
+ o A value of 11 denotes that the LSA is flooded throughout the
+ Autonomous System (e.g., has the same scope as type-5 LSAs).
+ Opaque LSAs with AS-wide scope are not flooded into stub areas.
+
+ Syntax Of The Opaque LSA's Link-State ID
+
+ The link-state ID of the Opaque LSA is divided into an Opaque Type
+ field (the first 8 bits) and an Opaque ID (the remaining 24 bits).
+ See section 7.0 of this document for a description of Opaque type
+ allocation and assignment.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 14]
+
+RFC 2370 The OSPF Opaque LSA Option July 1998
+
+
+Appendix B. Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
+
+ This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+ others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+ or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+ and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+ kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+ included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
+ document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+ the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+ Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+ developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+ copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+ followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+ English.
+
+ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+ revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+ TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+ HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Coltun Standards Track [Page 15]
+