summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt1739
1 files changed, 1739 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..17020c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc2787.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1739 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group B. Jewell
+Request for Comments: 2787 Copper Mountain Networks, Inc.
+Category: Standards Track D. Chuang
+ CoSine Communications
+ March 2000
+
+
+ Definitions of Managed Objects for the
+ Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This specification defines an extension to the Management Information
+ Base (MIB) for use with SNMP-based network management. In
+ particular, it defines objects for configuring, monitoring, and
+ controlling routers that employ the Virtual Router Redundancy
+ Protocol (VRRP) [17].
+
+ This memo specifies a MIB module in a manner that is compliant with
+ SMIv2 [5], and semantically identical to the SMIv1 definitions [2].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1 The SNMP Network Management Framework ................. 2
+ 2 Overview .............................................. 3
+ 2.1 VRRP MIB Structure .................................. 3
+ 2.2 Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol .................. 4
+ 2.3 VRRP MIB Table Design ............................... 4
+ 2.3.1 Relation to Interface Group ....................... 5
+ 2.4 VRRP Scenarios ...................................... 5
+ 2.4.1 Scenario #1 ....................................... 5
+ 2.4.2 Scenario #2 ....................................... 8
+ 3 Definitions ........................................... 11
+ 4 Security Considerations ............................... 27
+ 5 Acknowledgements ...................................... 28
+ 6 References ............................................ 28
+ 7 Authors' Addresses .................................... 30
+ 8 Intellectual Property Statement........................ 30
+ 9 Full Copyright Statement............................... 31
+
+1. The SNMP Management Framework
+
+ The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major
+ components:
+
+ o An overall architecture, described in RFC 2571 [1].
+
+ o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the
+ purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of
+ Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD
+ 16, RFC 1155 [2], STD 16, RFC 1212 [3] and RFC 1215 [4]. The second
+ version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 [5], STD
+ 58, RFC 2579 [6] and STD 58, RFC 2580 [7].
+
+ o Message protocols for transferring management information. The
+ first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and
+ described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the SNMP
+ message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track
+ protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [9] and RFC
+ 1906 [10]. The third version of the message protocol is called
+ SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [10], RFC 2572 [11] and RFC 2574
+ [12].
+
+ o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The first
+ set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described
+ in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol operations and
+ associated PDU formats is described in RFC 1905 [13].
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2573 [14] and
+ the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC 2575 [15].
+
+ A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management Framework
+ can be found in RFC 2570 [16].
+
+ Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
+ the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
+ defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.
+
+ This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A
+ MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate
+ translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically
+ equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no
+ translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable
+ information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in
+ SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine
+ readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the
+ MIB.
+
+2. Overview
+
+ This memo identifies the set of objects for configuring, monitoring,
+ and controlling the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP), as
+ defined in RFC 2338 [17].
+
+ VRRP specifies an election protocol that will allow one or more
+ associated IP addresses to be assumed by another router in the event
+ of a failure of the IP address(es) owner. Thus, IP traffic from a
+ host using a failed router as a default gateway is transparently
+ fowarded by the VRRP router that has assumed control. VRRP provides
+ redundancy in routed networks without requiring configuration of
+ dynamic routing or router discovery protocols on every end-host.
+
+ Since the VRRP protocol is intended for use with IPv4 routers only,
+ this MIB uses the SYNTAX for IP addresses which is specific to IPv4.
+ Thus, changes will be required for this MIB to interoperate in an
+ IPv6 environment.
+
+2.1. VRRP MIB Structure
+
+ The VRRP MIB contains three conformance groups:
+
+ - vrrpOperations Group: Objects related to VRRP router's
+ configuration and control.
+
+ - vrrpStatistics Group: Objects containing information useful in
+ monitoring the operation of VRRP routers.
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ - vrrpNotifications Group: Consists of objects and definitions for
+ use in SNMP notifications sent by VRRP routers.
+
+ Tables in the MIB include the following:
+
+ (1) The vrrpOperTable, which contains objects that define the
+ operational characteristics of a VRRP router. Rows in this table
+ correspond to instances of virtual routers.
+
+ (2) The vrrpAssoIpAddrTable, which contains the addresses of the
+ virtual router(s) that a given VRRP router is backing up.
+
+ (3) The vrrpRouterStatsTable which contains the operating statistics
+ for a VRRP router.
+
+2.2. Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol
+
+ This MIB is based on the following characteristics of VRRP as defined
+ in the VRRP specification [17].
+
+ - A "VRRP router" is one that is configured to run the VRRP protocol
+ in conjunction with one or more other VRRP routers attached to a
+ LAN.
+
+ - A VRRP router can be running one or more instances of a virtual
+ router.
+
+ - A "virtual router" is an abstraction which consists of two or more
+ physical routers associated by a Virtual Router Identifier (VRID).
+
+ - An instance of a virtual router (on a physical VRRP router), can be
+ uniquely identified by a combination of the 'ifIndex' [18] and
+ "Virtual Router Identifier" (VRID).
+
+ - For each VRID there is a set of one or more "associated IP
+ addresses" that are backed-up by the virtual router.
+
+2.3. VRRP MIB Table Design
+
+ The tables in the VRRP MIB are structured with the assumption that a
+ VRRP network management application would likely be designed to
+ display information or provide configuration about a VRRP router on a
+ "per-virtual-router basis". Thus, the tables defined in the MIB
+ consist of conceptual rows which are grouped in a manner to present a
+ view of individual virtual routers with a minimal number of SNMP
+ operations.
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+2.3.1. Relation to Interface Group (RFC 2233) [18].
+
+ Since a router can be participating in VRRP on one or more physical
+ interfaces, "ifIndex" is used as an index into the tables defined in
+ the VRRP MIB.
+
+2.4. VRRP Scenarios
+
+ The following section provides examples of how some of the objects in
+ this MIB are instantiated for two different VRRP scenarios.
+
+ KEY:
+ ----
+
+ The labels in the following tables and diagrams correspond to the
+ actual MIB objects as follows:
+
+ if = vrrpOperIfIndex
+ VrId = vrrpOperVrId
+ State = vrrpOperState
+ Prior = vrrpOperPriority
+ AddrCnt = vrrpOperIpAddrCount
+ IpAddr = vrrpOperMasterIpAddr
+ RowStat = vrrpOperRowStatus
+
+2.4.1. VRRP Scenario #1
+
+ The following figure shows a simple network with two VRRP routers
+ configured with two virtual routers. This sample topology is taken
+ from the VRRP specification [17]. Addresses in '()' indicate the IP
+ address of the default gateway for a given host, H1 - H4. In the
+ diagram, "Interface" is used in the context defined in IF-MIB [18].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ VRID=1 VRID=2
+ +-----+ +-----+
+ | MR1 | | MR2 |
+ | & | | & |
+ | BR2 | | BR1 |
+ +-----+ +-----+
+ IP A ---------->* *<---------- IP B
+ Interface=I1 | | Interface=I2
+ | |
+ | |
+ ------------------+------------+-----+--------+--------+--------+--
+ ^ ^ ^ ^
+ | | | |
+ (IP A) (IP A) (IP A) (IP A)
+ | | | |
+ +--+--+ +--+--+ +--+--+ +--+--+
+ | H1 | | H2 | | H3 | | H4 |
+ +-----+ +-----+ +--+--+ +--+--+
+
+
+
+ ----- MIB Tables For VRRP Router "IP A": -----
+
+ vrrpOperTable
+ -------------
+
+ | if | VrId | State | Prior | AddrCnt | IpAddr | ... | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I1 | 01 | M | 255 | 1 | A | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I1 | 02 | B | 1-254 | 1 | B | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 6]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrTable
+ -------------------
+
+ | if | VrId | IP | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I1 | 01 | A | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I1 | 02 | B | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+
+
+
+ ----- MIB Tables For VRRP Router "IP B": -----
+
+ vrrpOperTable
+ -------------
+
+ | if | VrId | State | Prior | AddrCnt | IpAddr | ... | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I2 | 01 | B | 1-254 | 1 | A | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I2 | 02 | M | 255 | 1 | B | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrTable
+ -------------------
+
+ | if | VrId | IP | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I2 | 01 | A | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I2 | 02 | B | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 7]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ NOTES:
+
+ 1) "I1" and "I2" are used to designate IF indices on each respective
+ router.
+
+ 2) For "State": M = Master; B = Backup.
+
+ 3) In the vrrpOperTable, a "priority" of 255 indicates that the
+ respective router owns the IP address, e.g., this IP address is
+ native to the router (i.e., "the IP Address Owner" [17]).
+
+2.4.2. VRRP Scenario #2
+
+ The following figure shows a simple network with two virtual routers.
+ Here, a single interface has been configured with two IP addresses.
+ Again, addresses in () indicate the IP address of the default gateway
+ for a given host, H1 - H2.
+
+ VRID=1 VRID=2
+ +-----+ +-----+
+ | MR1 | | MR2 |
+ | & | | & |
+ | BR2 | | BR1 |
+ +-----+ +-----+
+ IP A ---------->* *<---------- IP B
+ IP C | | Interface=I2
+ Interface=I1 | |
+ | |
+ | |
+ ------------------+------------+-----+--------+
+ ^ ^
+ | |
+ (IP A) (IP B)
+ | |
+ +--+--+ +--+--+
+ | H1 | | H2 |
+ +-----+ +-----+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 8]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ ----- MIB Tables For VRRP Router "IP A": -----
+
+ vrrpOperTable
+ -------------
+
+ | if | VrId | State | Prior | AddrCnt | IpAddr | ... | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I1 | 01 | M | 255 | 2 | A | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I1 | 02 | B | 1-254 | 1 | B | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrTable
+ -------------------
+
+ | if | VrId | IP | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I1 | 01 | A | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I1 | 01 | C | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I1 | 02 | B | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 9]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ ----- MIB Tables For VRRP Router "IP B": -----
+
+ vrrpOperTable
+ -------------
+
+ | if | VrId | State | Prior | AddrCnt | IpAddr | ... | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I2 | 01 | B | 1-254 | 2 | A | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ | I2 | 02 | M | 255 | 1 | B | | active |
+ | | | | | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+-------+---------+--------+-( )-+---------+
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrTable
+ -------------------
+
+ | if | VrId | IP | RowStat |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I2 | 01 | A | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I2 | 01 | C | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+ | | | | |
+ | I2 | 02 | B | active |
+ | | | | |
+ +----+------+-------+---------+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 10]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+3. Definitions
+
+VRRP-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
+
+ IMPORTS
+ MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
+ NOTIFICATION-TYPE, Counter32,
+ Integer32, IpAddress, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI
+
+ TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, RowStatus,
+ MacAddress, TruthValue, TimeStamp FROM SNMPv2-TC
+
+ MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP,
+ NOTIFICATION-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF
+ ifIndex FROM IF-MIB;
+
+
+ vrrpMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
+ LAST-UPDATED "200003030000Z"
+ ORGANIZATION "IETF VRRP Working Group"
+ CONTACT-INFO
+ "Brian R. Jewell
+ Postal: Copper Mountain Networks, Inc.
+ 2470 Embarcadero Way
+ Palo Alto, California 94303
+ Tel: +1 650 687 3367
+ E-Mail: bjewell@coppermountain.com"
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This MIB describes objects used for managing Virtual Router
+ Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) routers."
+ REVISION "200003030000Z" -- 03 Mar 2000
+ DESCRIPTION "Initial version as published in RFC 2787."
+ ::= { mib-2 68 }
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- Textual Conventions
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ VrId ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "A number which, along with an interface index (ifIndex),
+ serves to uniquely identify a virtual router on a given VRRP
+ router. A set of one or more associated addresses is assigned
+ to a VRID."
+ SYNTAX Integer32 (1..255)
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 11]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- VRRP MIB Groups
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpOperations OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { vrrpMIB 1 }
+ vrrpStatistics OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { vrrpMIB 2 }
+ vrrpConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { vrrpMIB 3 }
+
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- Start of MIB objects
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpNodeVersion OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Integer32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This value identifies the particular version of the VRRP
+ supported by this node."
+ ::= { vrrpOperations 1 }
+
+ vrrpNotificationCntl OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ enabled (1),
+ disabled (2)
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS read-write
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Indicates whether the VRRP-enabled router will generate
+ SNMP traps for events defined in this MIB. 'Enabled'
+ results in SNMP traps; 'disabled', no traps are sent."
+ DEFVAL { enabled }
+ ::= { vrrpOperations 2 }
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- VRRP Operations Table
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpOperTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF VrrpOperEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Operations table for a VRRP router which consists of a
+ sequence (i.e., one or more conceptual rows) of
+ 'vrrpOperEntry' items."
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 12]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ ::= { vrrpOperations 3 }
+
+ vrrpOperEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX VrrpOperEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in the vrrpOperTable containing the operational
+ characteristics of a virtual router. On a VRRP router,
+ a given virtual router is identified by a combination
+ of the IF index and VRID.
+
+ Rows in the table cannot be modified unless the value
+ of `vrrpOperAdminState' is `disabled' and the
+ `vrrpOperState' has transitioned to `initialize'."
+
+ INDEX { ifIndex, vrrpOperVrId }
+ ::= { vrrpOperTable 1 }
+
+ VrrpOperEntry ::=
+ SEQUENCE {
+ vrrpOperVrId
+ VrId,
+ vrrpOperVirtualMacAddr
+ MacAddress,
+ vrrpOperState
+ INTEGER,
+ vrrpOperAdminState
+ INTEGER,
+ vrrpOperPriority
+ Integer32,
+ vrrpOperIpAddrCount
+ Integer32,
+ vrrpOperMasterIpAddr
+ IpAddress,
+ vrrpOperPrimaryIpAddr
+ IpAddress,
+ vrrpOperAuthType
+ INTEGER,
+ vrrpOperAuthKey
+ OCTET STRING,
+ vrrpOperAdvertisementInterval
+ Integer32,
+ vrrpOperPreemptMode
+ TruthValue,
+ vrrpOperVirtualRouterUpTime
+ TimeStamp,
+ vrrpOperProtocol
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 13]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ INTEGER,
+ vrrpOperRowStatus
+ RowStatus
+ }
+
+ vrrpOperVrId OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX VrId
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This object contains the Virtual Router Identifier (VRID)."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 1 }
+
+ vrrpOperVirtualMacAddr OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX MacAddress
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The virtual MAC address of the virtual router. Although this
+ object can be derived from the 'vrrpOperVrId' object, it is
+ defined so that it is easily obtainable by a management
+ application and can be included in VRRP-related SNMP traps."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 2 }
+
+ vrrpOperState OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ initialize(1),
+ backup(2),
+ master(3)
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The current state of the virtual router. This object has
+ three defined values:
+
+ - `initialize', which indicates that all the
+ virtual router is waiting for a startup event.
+
+ - `backup', which indicates the virtual router is
+ monitoring the availability of the master router.
+
+ - `master', which indicates that the virtual router
+ is forwarding packets for IP addresses that are
+ associated with this router.
+
+ Setting the `vrrpOperAdminState' object (below) initiates
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 14]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ transitions in the value of this object."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 3 }
+
+ vrrpOperAdminState OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ up(1),
+ down(2)
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This object will enable/disable the virtual router
+ function. Setting the value to `up', will transition
+ the state of the virtual router from `initialize' to `backup'
+ or `master', depending on the value of `vrrpOperPriority'.
+ Setting the value to `down', will transition the
+ router from `master' or `backup' to `initialize'. State
+ transitions may not be immediate; they sometimes depend on
+ other factors, such as the interface (IF) state.
+
+ The `vrrpOperAdminState' object must be set to `down' prior
+ to modifying the other read-create objects in the conceptual
+ row. The value of the `vrrpOperRowStatus' object (below)
+ must be `active', signifying that the conceptual row
+ is valid (i.e., the objects are correctly set),
+ in order for this object to be set to `up'."
+ DEFVAL { down }
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 4 }
+
+ vrrpOperPriority OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Integer32 (0..255)
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This object specifies the priority to be used for the
+ virtual router master election process. Higher values imply
+ higher priority.
+
+ A priority of '0', although not settable, is sent by
+ the master router to indicate that this router has ceased
+ to participate in VRRP and a backup virtual router should
+ transition to become a new master.
+
+ A priority of 255 is used for the router that owns the
+ associated IP address(es)."
+ DEFVAL { 100 }
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 5 }
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 15]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ vrrpOperIpAddrCount OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Integer32 (0..255)
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The number of IP addresses that are associated with this
+ virtual router. This number is equal to the number of rows
+ in the vrrpAssoIpAddrTable that correspond to a given IF
+ index/VRID pair."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 6 }
+
+ vrrpOperMasterIpAddr OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX IpAddress
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The master router's real (primary) IP address. This is
+ the IP address listed as the source in VRRP advertisement
+ last received by this virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 7 }
+
+ vrrpOperPrimaryIpAddr OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX IpAddress
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "In the case where there is more than one IP address for
+ a given `ifIndex', this object is used to specify the IP
+ address that will become the `vrrpOperMasterIpAddr', should
+ the virtual router transition from backup to master. If
+ this object is set to 0.0.0.0, the IP address which is
+ numerically lowest will be selected."
+ DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 8 }
+
+ vrrpOperAuthType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ noAuthentication(1), -- VRRP protocol exchanges are not
+ -- authenticated.
+ simpleTextPassword(2), -- Exchanges are authenticated by a
+ -- clear text password.
+ ipAuthenticationHeader(3) -- Exchanges are authenticated using
+ -- the IP authentication header.
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 16]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ "Authentication type used for VRRP protocol exchanges between
+ virtual routers. This value of this object is the same for a
+ given ifIndex.
+
+ New enumerations to this list can only be added via a new
+ RFC on the standards track."
+ DEFVAL { noAuthentication }
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 9 }
+
+ vrrpOperAuthKey OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..16))
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The Authentication Key. This object is set according to
+ the value of the 'vrrpOperAuthType' object
+ ('simpleTextPassword' or 'ipAuthenticationHeader'). If the
+ length of the value is less than 16 octets, the agent will
+ left adjust and zero fill to 16 octets. The value of this
+ object is the same for a given ifIndex.
+
+ When read, vrrpOperAuthKey always returns an Octet String
+ of length zero."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 10 }
+
+ vrrpOperAdvertisementInterval OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Integer32 (1..255)
+ UNITS "seconds"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The time interval, in seconds, between sending
+ advertisement messages. Only the master router sends
+ VRRP advertisements."
+ DEFVAL { 1 }
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 11 }
+
+ vrrpOperPreemptMode OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TruthValue
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Controls whether a higher priority virtual router will
+ preempt a lower priority master."
+ DEFVAL { true }
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 12 }
+
+ vrrpOperVirtualRouterUpTime OBJECT-TYPE
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 17]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ SYNTAX TimeStamp
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This is the value of the `sysUpTime' object when this
+ virtual router (i.e., the `vrrpOperState') transitioned
+ out of `initialized'."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 13 }
+
+ vrrpOperProtocol OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ ip (1),
+ bridge (2),
+ decnet (3),
+ other (4)
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The particular protocol being controlled by this Virtual
+ Router.
+
+ New enumerations to this list can only be added via a new
+ RFC on the standards track."
+ DEFVAL { ip }
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 14 }
+
+ vrrpOperRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The row status variable, used in accordance to installation
+ and removal conventions for conceptual rows. The rowstatus of
+ a currently active row in the vrrpOperTable is constrained
+ by the operational state of the corresponding virtual router.
+ When `vrrpOperRowStatus' is set to active(1), no other
+ objects in the conceptual row, with the exception of
+ `vrrpOperAdminState', can be modified. Prior to setting the
+ `vrrpOperRowStatus' object from `active' to a different value,
+ the `vrrpOperAdminState' object must be set to `down' and the
+ `vrrpOperState' object be transitioned to `initialize'.
+
+ To create a row in this table, a manager sets this object
+ to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5). Until instances
+ of all corresponding columns are appropriately configured,
+ the value of the corresponding instance of the `vrrpOperRowStatus'
+ column will be read as notReady(3).
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 18]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active(1)
+ until (minimally) the corresponding instance of
+ `vrrpOperVrId' has been set and there is at least one active
+ row in the `vrrpAssoIpAddrTable' defining an associated
+ IP address for the virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpOperEntry 15 }
+
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- VRRP Associated IP Address Table
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF VrrpAssoIpAddrEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The table of addresses associated with this virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpOperations 4 }
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX VrrpAssoIpAddrEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in the table contains an IP address that is
+ associated with a virtual router. The number of rows for
+ a given ifIndex and VrId will equal the number of IP
+ addresses associated (e.g., backed up) by the virtual
+ router (equivalent to 'vrrpOperIpAddrCount').
+
+ Rows in the table cannot be modified unless the value
+ of `vrrpOperAdminState' is `disabled' and the
+ `vrrpOperState' has transitioned to `initialize'."
+
+ INDEX { ifIndex, vrrpOperVrId, vrrpAssoIpAddr }
+ ::= { vrrpAssoIpAddrTable 1 }
+
+ VrrpAssoIpAddrEntry ::=
+ SEQUENCE {
+ vrrpAssoIpAddr
+ IpAddress,
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrRowStatus
+ RowStatus
+ }
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddr OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX IpAddress
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 19]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The assigned IP addresses that a virtual router is
+ responsible for backing up."
+ ::= { vrrpAssoIpAddrEntry 1 }
+
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The row status variable, used according to installation
+ and removal conventions for conceptual rows. Setting this
+ object to active(1) or createAndGo(4) results in the
+ addition of an associated address for a virtual router.
+ Destroying the entry or setting it to notInService(2)
+ removes the associated address from the virtual router.
+ The use of other values is implementation-dependent."
+ ::= { vrrpAssoIpAddrEntry 2 }
+
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- VRRP Router Statistics
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpRouterChecksumErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets received with an invalid
+ VRRP checksum value."
+ ::= { vrrpStatistics 1 }
+
+ vrrpRouterVersionErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets received with an unknown
+ or unsupported version number."
+ ::= { vrrpStatistics 2 }
+
+ vrrpRouterVrIdErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 20]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets received with an invalid
+ VRID for this virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpStatistics 3 }
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- VRRP Router Statistics Table
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpRouterStatsTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF VrrpRouterStatsEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Table of virtual router statistics."
+ ::= { vrrpStatistics 4 }
+
+ vrrpRouterStatsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX VrrpRouterStatsEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in the table, containing statistics information
+ about a given virtual router."
+ AUGMENTS { vrrpOperEntry }
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsTable 1 }
+
+ VrrpRouterStatsEntry ::=
+ SEQUENCE {
+ vrrpStatsBecomeMaster
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsAdvertiseRcvd
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsAdvertiseIntervalErrors
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsAuthFailures
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsIpTtlErrors
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsPriorityZeroPktsRcvd
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsPriorityZeroPktsSent
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsInvalidTypePktsRcvd
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsAddressListErrors
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsInvalidAuthType
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 21]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsAuthTypeMismatch
+ Counter32,
+ vrrpStatsPacketLengthErrors
+ Counter32
+ }
+
+ vrrpStatsBecomeMaster OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of times that this virtual router's state
+ has transitioned to MASTER."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 1 }
+
+ vrrpStatsAdvertiseRcvd OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP advertisements received by this
+ virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 2 }
+
+ vrrpStatsAdvertiseIntervalErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP advertisement packets received
+ for which the advertisement interval is different than the
+ one configured for the local virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 3 }
+
+ vrrpStatsAuthFailures OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets received that do not pass
+ the authentication check."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 4 }
+
+ vrrpStatsIpTtlErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 22]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets received by the virtual
+ router with IP TTL (Time-To-Live) not equal to 255."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 5 }
+
+ vrrpStatsPriorityZeroPktsRcvd OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets received by the virtual
+ router with a priority of '0'."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 6 }
+
+ vrrpStatsPriorityZeroPktsSent OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of VRRP packets sent by the virtual router
+ with a priority of '0'."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 7 }
+
+ vrrpStatsInvalidTypePktsRcvd OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The number of VRRP packets received by the virtual router
+ with an invalid value in the 'type' field."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 8 }
+
+ vrrpStatsAddressListErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of packets received for which the address
+ list does not match the locally configured list for the
+ virtual router."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 9 }
+
+ vrrpStatsInvalidAuthType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of packets received with an unknown
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 23]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ authentication type."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 10 }
+
+ vrrpStatsAuthTypeMismatch OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of packets received with 'Auth Type' not
+ equal to the locally configured authentication method
+ (`vrrpOperAuthType')."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 11 }
+
+ vrrpStatsPacketLengthErrors OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Counter32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The total number of packets received with a packet length
+ less than the length of the VRRP header."
+ ::= { vrrpRouterStatsEntry 12 }
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- Trap Definitions
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { vrrpMIB 0 }
+
+ vrrpTrapPacketSrc OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX IpAddress
+ MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The IP address of an inbound VRRP packet. Used by
+ vrrpTrapAuthFailure trap."
+ ::= { vrrpOperations 5 }
+
+ vrrpTrapAuthErrorType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ invalidAuthType (1),
+ authTypeMismatch (2),
+ authFailure (3)
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Potential types of configuration conflicts.
+ Used by vrrpAuthFailure trap."
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 24]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ ::= { vrrpOperations 6 }
+
+ vrrpTrapNewMaster NOTIFICATION-TYPE
+ OBJECTS { vrrpOperMasterIpAddr
+ }
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The newMaster trap indicates that the sending agent
+ has transitioned to 'Master' state."
+ ::= { vrrpNotifications 1 }
+
+ vrrpTrapAuthFailure NOTIFICATION-TYPE
+ OBJECTS { vrrpTrapPacketSrc,
+ vrrpTrapAuthErrorType
+ }
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "A vrrpAuthFailure trap signifies that a packet has
+ been received from a router whose authentication key
+ or authentication type conflicts with this router's
+ authentication key or authentication type. Implementation
+ of this trap is optional."
+ ::= { vrrpNotifications 2 }
+
+
+-- *******************************************************************
+-- Conformance Information
+-- *******************************************************************
+
+ vrrpMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { vrrpConformance 1 }
+ vrrpMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { vrrpConformance 2 }
+
+-- ...................................................................
+-- Compliance Statements
+-- ...................................................................
+
+ vrrpMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The core compliance statement for all VRRP implementations."
+ MODULE -- this module
+ MANDATORY-GROUPS {
+ vrrpOperGroup,
+ vrrpStatsGroup
+ }
+ OBJECT vrrpOperPriority
+ WRITE-SYNTAX Integer32 (1..255)
+ DESCRIPTION "SETable values are from 1 to 255."
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 25]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ ::= { vrrpMIBCompliances 1 }
+
+-- ...................................................................
+-- Conformance Groups
+-- ...................................................................
+
+ vrrpOperGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS {
+ vrrpNodeVersion,
+ vrrpNotificationCntl,
+ vrrpOperVirtualMacAddr,
+ vrrpOperState,
+ vrrpOperAdminState,
+ vrrpOperPriority,
+ vrrpOperIpAddrCount,
+ vrrpOperMasterIpAddr,
+ vrrpOperPrimaryIpAddr,
+ vrrpOperAuthType,
+ vrrpOperAuthKey,
+ vrrpOperAdvertisementInterval,
+ vrrpOperPreemptMode,
+ vrrpOperVirtualRouterUpTime,
+ vrrpOperProtocol,
+ vrrpOperRowStatus,
+ vrrpAssoIpAddrRowStatus
+ }
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Conformance group for VRRP operations."
+ ::= { vrrpMIBGroups 1 }
+
+ vrrpStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS {
+ vrrpRouterChecksumErrors,
+ vrrpRouterVersionErrors,
+ vrrpRouterVrIdErrors,
+ vrrpStatsBecomeMaster,
+ vrrpStatsAdvertiseRcvd,
+ vrrpStatsAdvertiseIntervalErrors,
+ vrrpStatsAuthFailures,
+ vrrpStatsIpTtlErrors,
+ vrrpStatsPriorityZeroPktsRcvd,
+ vrrpStatsPriorityZeroPktsSent,
+ vrrpStatsInvalidTypePktsRcvd,
+ vrrpStatsAddressListErrors,
+ vrrpStatsInvalidAuthType,
+ vrrpStatsAuthTypeMismatch,
+ vrrpStatsPacketLengthErrors
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 26]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ }
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Conformance group for VRRP statistics."
+ ::= { vrrpMIBGroups 2 }
+
+ vrrpTrapGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS {
+ vrrpTrapPacketSrc,
+ vrrpTrapAuthErrorType
+ }
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Conformance group for objects contained in VRRP notifications."
+ ::= { vrrpMIBGroups 3 }
+
+ vrrpNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
+ NOTIFICATIONS {
+ vrrpTrapNewMaster,
+ vrrpTrapAuthFailure
+ }
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The VRRP MIB Notification Group."
+ ::= { vrrpMIBGroups 4 }
+
+END
+
+4. Security Considerations
+
+ There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB that
+ have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write or read-create. Such objects
+ may be considered sensitive or vulnerable to security attacks in some
+ networking environments. The support for SET operations in a non-
+ secure environment without proper protection can have a negative
+ effect on VRRP router operations.
+
+ A number of objects in the vrrpOperTable possess the read-create
+ attribute. Manipulation of these objects is capable of affecting the
+ operation of a virtual router.
+
+ Specific examples of this include, but are not limited to:
+
+ o The vrrpOperAdminState object which could be used to disable a
+ virtual router.
+
+ o The vrrpOperPrimaryIpAddr object which, if compromised, could allow
+ assignment of an invalid IP address to a master router.
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 27]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ o The authentication type/key related objects which could potentially
+ render the VRRP security mechanisms ineffective.
+
+ Of additional concern is the ability to disable the transmission of
+ traps. This would nullify the capability of a virtual router to
+ provide notification in the event of an authentication failure.
+
+ SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network
+ itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no
+ control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and
+ GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB.
+
+ It is recommended that the implementers consider the security
+ features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use
+ of the User-based Security Model RFC 2574 [RFC2574] and the View-
+ based Access Control Model RFC 2575 [RFC2575] is recommended.
+
+ It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP
+ entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly
+ configured to give access to the objects only to those principals
+ (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET
+ (change/create/delete) them.
+
+5. Acknowledgements
+
+ The authors would like to thank Danny Mitzel, Venkat Prasad, Al Pham,
+ Robert Hinden, Venkat Prasad, Barbera Denny, Fred Baker, Jeff Case,
+ Flavio Fernandes, Acee Lindem, Scott Barvick, and Bert Wijnen for
+ their comments and suggestions.
+
+6. References
+
+ [1] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for
+ Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April 1999.
+
+ [2] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
+ Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC
+ 1155, May 1990.
+
+ [3] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,
+ RFC 1212, March 1991.
+
+ [4] Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the
+ SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991.
+
+ [5] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
+ M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information
+ Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 28]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+ [6] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
+ M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,
+ RFC 2579, April 1999.
+
+ [7] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
+ M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD
+ 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
+
+ [8] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple
+ Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.
+
+ [9] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
+ "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January
+ 1996.
+
+ [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
+ "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network
+ Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.
+
+ [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message
+ Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management
+ Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999.
+
+ [12] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM)
+ for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
+ (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.
+
+ [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol
+ Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management
+ Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.
+
+ [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications", RFC
+ 2573, April 1999.
+
+ [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access
+ Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol
+ (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999
+
+ [16] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction
+ to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management
+ Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999
+
+ [17] Knight, S., Weaver, D., Whipple, D., Hinden, R., Mitzel, D.,
+ Hunt, P., Higginson, P., Shand, M. and Lindem, A., "Virtual
+ Router Redundancy Protocol", RFC 2338, November 1997.
+
+ [18] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB
+ using SMIv2", RFC 2233, November 1997.
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 29]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+7. Authors' Addresses
+
+ Brian R. Jewell
+ Copper Mountain Networks, Inc.
+ 2470 Embarcadero Way
+ Palo Alto, California 94303
+ US
+
+ Phone: +1 650 687 3367
+ EMail: bjewell@coppermountain.com
+
+
+ David Chuang
+ CoSine Communications
+ 1200 Bridge Parkway
+ Redwood City, CA 94065
+ US
+
+ Phone: +1 650 628 4850
+ EMail: david_chuang@cosinecom.com
+
+8. Intellectual Property Statement
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
+ has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
+ IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
+ standards- related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
+ claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
+ licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
+ obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
+ proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
+ be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
+ Director.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 30]
+
+RFC 2787 VRRP MIB Management Objects March 2000
+
+
+9. Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
+
+ This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+ others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+ or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+ and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+ kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+ included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
+ document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+ the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+ Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+ developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+ copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+ followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+ English.
+
+ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+ revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+ TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+ HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jewell & Chuang Standards Track [Page 31]
+