summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt899
1 files changed, 899 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aeff87b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3134.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,899 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. Dunn
+Request for Comments: 3134 C. Martin
+Category: Informational ANC, Inc.
+ June 2001
+
+
+ Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
+ not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
+ memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This memo discusses and defines terms associated with performance
+ benchmarking tests and the results of these tests in the context of
+ Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) based switching devices supporting
+ ABR (Available Bit Rate). The terms defined in this memo will be
+ used in addition to terms defined in RFCs 1242, 2285, and 2544 and
+ 2761. This memo is a product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
+ Group (BMWG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ This document provides terminology for benchmarking ATM based
+ switching devices supporting ABR. It extends terminology already
+ defined for benchmarking network interconnect devices in RFC's 1242,
+ 2285, and 2544 and 2761. Although some of the definitions in this
+ memo may be applicable to a broader group of network interconnect
+ devices, the primary focus of the terminology in this memo is on ATM
+ ABR.
+
+ This memo contains two major sections: Background and Definitions.
+ The background section provides the reader with an overview of the
+ technology and IETF formalisms. The definitions section is split
+ into two sub-sections. The formal definitions sub-section is
+ provided as a courtesy to the reader. The measurement definitions
+ sub-section contains performance metrics with inherent units.
+
+ This document assumes that necessary services are available and
+ active. For example, IP connectivity requires SSCOP connectivity
+ between signaling entities. Further, it is assumed that the SUT has
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ the ability to configure ATM addresses (via hard coded addresses,
+ ILMI or PNNI neighbor discovery), has the ability to run SSCOP, and
+ has the ability to perform signaled call setups (via UNI or PNNI
+ signaling). Finally, this document presents only the terminology
+ associated with benchmarking IP performance over ATM; therefore, it
+ does not represent a total compilation of ATM test terminology.
+
+ The BMWG produces two major classes of documents: Benchmarking
+ Terminology documents and Benchmarking Methodology documents. The
+ Terminology documents present the benchmarks and other related terms.
+ The Methodology documents define the procedures required to collect
+ the benchmarks cited in the corresponding Terminology documents.
+
+2. Existing Definitions.
+
+ RFC 1242, "Benchmarking Terminology for Network Interconnect
+ Devices", should be consulted before attempting to make use of this
+ document. RFC 2544, "Benchmarking Methodology for Network
+ Interconnect Devices", contains discussions of a number of terms
+ relevant to the benchmarking of switching devices and should be
+ consulted. RFC 2285, "Benchmarking Terminology for LAN Switching
+ Devices", contains a number of terms pertaining to traffic
+ distributions and datagram interarrival. RFC 2761, "Terminology for
+ ATM Benchmarking", contains a number terms pertaining to traffic
+ management [TM4.0, TM4.1]. Many of the metrics defined in RFC 2761
+ (e.g., CDV, CER, CLR, CMR, and CTD) also apply to ABR performance
+ benchmarking. These metrics will not be redefined in this document.
+ For the sake of clarity and continuity, this RFC adopts the template
+ for definitions set out in Section 2 of RFC 1242.
+
+II. Definitions
+
+ The definitions presented in this section have been divided into two
+ groups. The first group is formal definitions, which are required in
+ the definitions of the performance metrics but are not themselves
+ strictly metrics. These definitions are subsumed from other work
+ done in other working groups both inside and outside the IETF. They
+ are provided as a courtesy to the reader.
+
+1. Formal Definitions
+
+1.1. Definition Format (from RFC 1242)
+
+ Term to be defined.
+
+ Definition: The specific definition for the term.
+
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ Discussion: A brief discussion of the term, its application and any
+ restrictions on measurement procedures.
+
+ Specification: The working group and document in which the terms are
+ specified and are listed in the references section.
+
+1.2. Related Definitions.
+
+1.2.1. Allowed Cell Rate (ACR)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, ACR is the current rate
+ (cells/second) at which a source is allowed to send.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, ACR constitutes the actual data
+ throughput for a particular VC. The time change of this value
+ effects TCP round trip time calculations, which in turn effects TCP
+ throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.2. ACR Decrease Time Factor (ADTF)
+
+ Definition: This is the time permitted between sending RM-cells
+ before the rate is decreased to ICR (Initial Cell Rate). The time
+ units are .01 to 10.23 seconds with a granularity of 10 ms.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, ADTF constitutes the time rate of the
+ ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which in
+ turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.3. Additive Increase Rate (AIR)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, AIR controls the rate at which
+ the cell transmission rate increases. It is signaled as AIRF, where
+
+ AIRF = AIR*Nrm/PCR.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, AIR effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.4. Additive Increase Rate Factor (AIRF)
+
+ Definition: Refer to AIR.
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 3]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ Discussion: Refer to AIR.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.5. Available Bit Rate (ABR)
+
+ Definition: ABR is an ATM layer service category for which the
+ limiting ATM layer transfer characteristics provided by the network
+ may change subsequent to connection establishment. A flow control
+ mechanism is specified which supports several types of feedback to
+ control the source rate in response to changing ATM layer transfer
+ characteristics.
+
+ Discussion: It is expected that an end-system that adapts its traffic
+ in accordance with the feedback will experience a low cell loss ratio
+ and obtain a fair share of the available bandwidth according to a
+ network specific allocation policy. Cell delay variation is not
+ controlled in this service, although admitted cells are not delayed
+ unnecessarily.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.6. Available Bit Rate (ABR) Compliance (Conformance)
+
+ Definition: ABR connection conformance refers to the behavior
+ specified for ABR destination and switches, but allows for delays
+ between the source and the UNI [UNI3.1, UNI4.0], which may perturb
+ the traffic flow.
+
+ Discussion: The cells on an ABR connection applies to CLP=0 cells,
+ which are tested upon arrival. At the arrival point, each cell is
+ identified as conforming or non-conforming. The minimal conformance
+ definition for ABR is GCRA((1/PCR),t1), where PCR is defined for
+ CLP=0 flow.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.7. BN
+
+ Definition: The BN bit in the RM-cell indicated whether the RM-cell
+ is a BECN cell or not.
+
+ Discussion: If BN=0, the RM cells were generated by the source. If
+ BN=1, the RM cells were generated by the destination or a switch.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 4]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+1.2.8. CCR
+
+ Definition: The CCR field in the RM-cell is set by the source to its
+ current ACR. CCR is formatted as a rate.
+
+ Discussion: For BECN cells, CCR=0.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.9. Cell Blocks (CB)
+
+ Definition: Cell blocks are a sequence of N cells transmitted
+ consecutively on a given connection.
+
+ Discussion: A cell block will normally correspond to the number of
+ information cells transmitted between successive OAM cells.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.10. Congestion Indication (CI)
+
+ Definition: The CI bit in the RM-cell allows a network element to
+ indicate that there is congestion in the network.
+
+ Discussion: When the source receives a backward RM-cell with CI=1,
+ ACR is decreased. When the destination turns around a forward RM-
+ cell, the CI is set to 1 to indicate that the previously received
+ data cell had the EFCI state set.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.11. Cutoff Decrease Factor (CDF)
+
+ Definition: CDF controls the decrease in ACR (Allowed Cell Rate)
+ associated with CRM (missing RM cell count).
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, CDF effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 5]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+1.2.12. DIR
+
+ Definition: The DIR bit in the RM-cell indicates which direction of
+ data flow is associated with the RM-cell. DIR is changed from 0 to 1
+ when an RM-cell is turned around at the destination.
+
+ Discussion: A forward RM-cell is indicated by DIR=0 and is associated
+ with data cells flowing in the same direction. A backward RM-cell is
+ indicated by DIR=1 and is associated with data cells flowing in the
+ opposite direction.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.13. Explicit Rate (ER)
+
+ Definition: The ER field in the RM-cell is used to limit the source
+ ACR to a specific value. For each RM-cell, ER is set by the source
+ to a requested rate (e.g., PCR). It may be reduced by any network
+ element in the path to a value that the element can sustain. ER is
+ formatted as a rate.
+
+ Discussion: None.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.14. Feedback
+
+ Definition: Information carried in the backward RM-cells provided by
+ the network elements and/or the destination back to the source.
+
+ Discussion: Feedback may include information in the ER field, or the
+ CI or NI bits of each backward RM-cell.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.15. Ideal Transmission Time (ITT)
+
+ Definition: The transmission time for ABR CLP=0 cells, if the
+ difference between itself and the transmission time for the previous
+ CLP=0 cell on the connection is greater than or equal to the minimum:
+ a) the inverse of the ACR in effect immediately after the
+ transmission time of the first of the two cells b) the inverse of the
+ ACR in effect immediately before the transmission time of the second
+ of the two cells.
+
+ Discussion: The transmission time for the first cell on the
+ connection is automatically an ITT.
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 6]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.16. Initial Cell Rate (ICR)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, in cells/sec, that is the rate
+ at which a source should send initially and after an idle period.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.17. In-Rate Cells
+
+ Definition: In-Rate ABR cells are sent with CLP=0.
+
+ Discussion: ABR RM-cells shall be sent with CLP=0 except in certain
+ circumstances, See Out-of-Rate Cells. All other ABR cells shall be
+ sent with CLP=0.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.18. Minimum Cell Rate (MCR)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service traffic descriptor, in cells/sec, that is
+ the rate at which the source is always allowed to send.
+
+ Discussion: MCR may be set to zero. The bandwidth available from the
+ network may vary, but shall not become less than MCR.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.19. Mrm
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter that controls allocation of
+ bandwidth between forward W-cells, backward RM-cells, and data cells.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.20. No Increase (NI)
+
+ Definition: The NI bit in the RM-cell is used to prevent a source
+ from increasing its ACR. NI does not require any decrease in value.
+
+ Discussion: None.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 7]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+1.2.21. Nrm
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, Nrm is the maximum number of
+ cells a source may send for each forward RM-cell.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.22. Out-of-Rate Cells
+
+ Definition: Out-of-Rate ABR cells are sent with CLP=1.
+
+ Discussion: This may be used to enable a rate increase for a
+ connection that has an ACR=0. The source would generate out-of-rate
+ cells to probe the network to learn when it may increase its rate.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.23. Rate Decrease Factor (RDF)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, RDF controls the decrease in
+ the cell transmission rate. RDF is a power of 2 from 1/32,768 to 1.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, RDF effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.24. Rate Increase Factor (RIF)
+
+ Definition: This controls the amount by which the cell transmission
+ rate may increase upon receipt of a RM-cell. The additive increase
+ rate AIR=PCR*RIF. RIF is a power of 2, ranging from 1/32,768 to 1.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, RIF effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.25. Resource Management (RM) Cells
+
+ Definition: RM cells are used to convey network status (available
+ bandwidth, congestion levels) and request peak cell rates for ATM
+ blocks. The RM cell has the following format:
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 8]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ Header: 5 bytes, same as the ATM cell header Protocol ID: 3 bytes,
+ protocol ID value is 1 for ABR service Function specific field: 45
+ bytes, data required for the specific protocol (See DIR, BN, CI, NI,
+ ER, CCR, and MCR for field information.) Rsvd: 6 bytes, reserved for
+ future specification EDC: 10 bytes, CRC-10 error detection code
+ computed over the cell payload .ti6 (except the CRC-10 field) and
+ used to check for data corruption
+
+ Discussion: RM information can exist at the VP and/or VC level. VP
+ level cells are identified with a VCI value of 6. VC level cells are
+ identified with a PT of 6. See DIR, BN, CI, NI, ER, CCR, and MCR for
+ additional protocol field information.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.26. Severely Errored Cell Block (SECB)
+
+ Definition: A severely cell block outcome occurs when more than M
+ errored cells, lost cells, or misinserted cell outcomes are observed
+ in a received cell block.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.1
+
+1.2.27. Tagged Cell Rate (TCR)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, TCR limits the rate at which a
+ source may send out-of-rate forward RM-cells. TCR is a constant
+ fixed at 10 cells/second.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.28. TDF
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, TDF controls the decrease in
+ ACR associated with TOF. TDF is signaled as TDFF, where TDF=TDFF/RDF
+ times the smallest power of 2 greater or equal to PCR. TDF is in
+ units of 1/seconds.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, TDF effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 9]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+1.2.29. TDFF
+
+ Definition: Refer to TDF. TDFF is either zero or a power of two in
+ the range 1/64 to 1 in units of 1 /cells.
+
+ Discussion: Refer to TDF.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+ 1.2.30. Time Out Factor (TOF)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, TOF controls the maximum time
+ permitted between sending forward RM-cells before a rate decrease is
+ required. It is signaled as TOFF where TOF=TOFF+1. TOFF is a power
+ of 2 in the range: 1/8 to 4,096.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, TOF effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.31. Time Out Factor (TOFF)
+
+ Definition: Refer to TOF.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.32. Trm
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter that provides an upper bound on
+ the time between forward RM-cells for an active source. It is 100
+ times a power of two with a range of 100*2-7 to 100*20
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, Trm effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.33. Virtual Source/Virtual Destination (VSND)
+
+ Definition: An ABR connection may be divided into two or more
+ separately controlled ABR segments. Each ABR control segment, except
+ the first, is sourced by a virtual source. A virtual source
+ implements the behavior of an ABR source endpoint. Backward RM-cells
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 10]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ received by a virtual source are removed from the connection. Each
+ ABR control segment, except the last, is terminated by a virtual
+ destination. A virtual destination assumes the behavior of an ABR
+ destination endpoint. Forward RM-cells received by a virtual
+ destination are turned around and not forwarded to the next segment
+ of the connection.
+
+ Discussion: none.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.34. Xrm Decrease Factor (XDM)
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, XDF controls the decrease in
+ ACR associated with Xrm. It is a power of two in range: [0, 1].
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, XDM effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+1.2.35. Xrm
+
+ Definition: An ABR service parameter, Xrm limits the number of
+ forward RM-cells which may be sent in the absence of received
+ backward PM-cells. The range is 0-255.
+
+ Discussion: For ABR traffic, Xrm effects the time rate of change of
+ the ACR. This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
+ in turn effects TCP throughput.
+
+ Specification: AF-TM4.0
+
+2. Performance Metrics
+
+2.1. Definition Format (from RFC 1242)
+
+ Metric to be defined.
+
+ Definition: The specific definition for the metric.
+
+ Discussion: A brief discussion of the metric, its application and any
+ restrictions on measurement procedures.
+
+ Measurement units: Intrinsic units used to quantify this metric.
+ This includes subsidiary units; e.g., microseconds are acceptable if
+ the intrinsic unit is seconds.
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 11]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+2.2. Definitions
+
+2.2.1. ABR Rate Decrease Response Time (ARDRT)
+
+ Definition: The amount of time required by the SUT to adjust its
+ transmission rate based on an ABR rate decrease request.
+
+ Discussion: During the ARDRT, cells transmitted by the SUT may be
+ dropped by the network due to traffic policing. These dropped cells
+ may contain a portion of an IP datagram. This may cause IP and TCP
+ packet loss.
+
+ Measurement Units: seconds
+
+2.2.2. ABR Rate Increase Response Time (ARIRT)
+
+ Definition: The amount of time required by the SUT to adjust its
+ transmission rate based on an ABR rate increase request.
+
+ Discussion: During the ARIRT, the SUT will not fully utilize the
+ available bandwidth. This will negatively impact IP and TCP
+ throughput.
+
+ Measurement Units: seconds
+
+2.2.3. RM-Cell Delay Variation (RM-CDV)
+
+ Definition: The variation in RM-cell transfer delay (RM-CTD) of RM-
+ cells associated with a given traffic load, orientation and
+ distribution, as well as an integration period. RM-CDV = max (RM-
+ CTD) - min (RM-CTD) where max and min indicate the maximum and
+ minimum over the integration period, respectively.
+
+ Discussion: RM-CDV is a component of RM-cell transfer delay, induced
+ by buffering and RM-cell scheduling.
+
+ RM-CDV effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
+ the condition of the network. This in turn effects TCP round trip
+ time calculations. Large values of RM-CDV will adversely effect TCP
+ throughput and cause SAR timeout.
+
+ Measurement Units: seconds
+
+2.2.4. RM-Cell Error Ratio (RM-CER)
+
+ Definition: The ratio of RM-cells with payload errors in a
+ transmission in relation to the total number of RM-cells sent in a
+ transmission associated with a given traffic load, orientation and
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 12]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ distribution, as well as an integration period. Note that errors
+ occurring in the RM-cell header will cause RM-cell loss at the ATM
+ layer. Note further that multiple errors in a payload will only be
+ counted as one cell payload error.
+
+ RM-CER = RM-Cells with payload errors / Total RM-Cells Transmitted.
+
+ Discussion: The measurement is taken over a time interval and is
+ desirable to be measured on an in-service circuit. RM-CER effects the
+ time required to notify the source of a change in the condition of
+ the network. This in turn effects TCP round trip time calculations.
+ Large values of RM-CER will adversely effect TCP throughput and cause
+ SAR timeout.
+
+ Measurement Units: dimensionless.
+
+2.2.5. RM-Cell Loss Ratio (RM-CLR)
+
+ Definition: The ratio of lost RM-cells in a transmission in relation
+ to the total RM-cells sent in a transmission associated with a given
+ traffic load, orientation and distribution, as well as an integration
+ period.
+
+ RM-CLR = Lost RM-Cells / Total RM-Cells Transmitted.
+
+ Discussion: The objective is to minimize RM-CLR. It is expressed as
+ an order of magnitude, having a range of 10^-1 to 10^-15 and
+ unspecified.
+
+ RM-CLR effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
+ the condition of the network. This in turn effects TCP round trip
+ time calculations. Large values of RM-CLR will adversely effect TCP
+ throughput and cause SAR timeout.
+
+ Measurement Units: dimensionless.
+
+2.2.6. RM-Cell Misinsertion Ratio (RM-CMR)
+
+ Definition: The ratio of RM-cells received at an endpoint that were
+ not originally transmitted by the source end in relation to the total
+ number of RM-cells properly transmitted associated with a given
+ traffic load, orientation and distribution, as well as an integration
+ period.
+
+ RM-CMR = Misinserted RM-Cells / Total RM-Cells Transmitted.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 13]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ Discussion: The measurement is taken over a time interval and is
+ desirable to be measured on an in-service circuit.
+
+ RM-CMR effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
+ the condition of the network. This in turn effects TCP round trip
+ time calculations. Large values of RM-CMR will adversely effect TCP
+ throughput and cause SAR timeout.
+
+ Measurement Units: dimensionless.
+
+2.2.7. RM-CRC Error Ratio
+
+ Definition: The ratio of RM-cells received at an endpoint which
+ contain an invalid CRC in relation to the total number of RM-cells
+ properly transmitted associated with a given traffic load,
+ orientation and distribution, as well as an integration period.
+
+ Discussion: RM-CRC errors cause ATM RM-cells to be lost.
+
+ RM-CRC effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
+ the condition of the network. This in turn effects TCP round trip
+ time calculations. Large values of RM-CRC will adversely effect TCP
+ throughput and cause SAR timeout.
+
+ Measurement Units: dimensionless
+
+2.2.8. RM-Cell Transfer Delay (RM-CTD)
+
+ Definition: The elapsed time between a RM-cell exit event at the
+ measurement point 1 (e.g., at the source UNI) and the corresponding
+ RM-cell entry event at a measurement point 2 (e.g., the destination
+ UNI) for a particular connection.
+
+ Discussion: The RM-cell transfer delay between two measurement points
+ is the sum of the total inter-ATM node transmission delay and the
+ total ATM node processing delay. This number is a constant and
+ should not adversely effect performance.
+
+ Measurement units: seconds
+
+2.2.9. Severely Errored Cell Block Ratio (SECBR)
+
+ Definition: The ratio of severely errored cell blocks in a
+ transmission in relation to the total cell blocks sent in a
+ transmission associated with a given traffic load, orientation and
+ distribution, as well as an integration period.
+
+ SECBR = Severely Errored Cell Blocks/Total Transmitted Cell Blocks
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 14]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+ Discussion: SECBR may cause the SUT to drop cells that may contain a
+ portion of an IP datagram. This may cause IP and TCP packet loss.
+
+ Measurement Units: dimensionless.
+
+3. Security Considerations
+
+ As this document is solely for providing terminology and describes
+ neither a protocol nor an implementation, there are no security
+ considerations associated with this document.
+
+4. References
+
+ [AF-TM4.0] ATM Forum, Traffic Management Specification Version 4.0,
+ af-tm-0056.00, April 1996.
+
+ [AF-TM4.1] ATM Forum, Traffic Management Specification Version 4.1,
+ af-tm-0121.000, March 1999.
+
+ [AF-UNI3.1] ATM Forum, User Network Interface Specification Version
+ 3.1, September 1994.
+
+ [AF-UNI4.0] ATM Forum, User Network Interface Specification Version
+ 4.0, July 1996.
+
+5. Editors' Addresses
+
+ Jeffrey Dunn
+ Advanced Network Consultants, Inc.
+ 4214 Crest Place
+ Ellicott City, MD 21043 USA
+
+ Phone: +1 (410) 750-1700
+ EMail: Jeffrey.Dunn@worldnet.att.net
+
+
+ Cynthia Martin
+ Advanced Network Consultants, Inc.
+ 4214 Crest Place
+ Ellicott City, MD 21043 USA
+
+ Phone: +1 (410) 750-1700
+ EMail: Cynthia.E.Martin@worldnet.att.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 15]
+
+RFC 3134 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking June 2001
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
+
+ This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+ others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+ or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+ and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+ kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+ included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
+ document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+ the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+ Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+ developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+ copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+ followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+ English.
+
+ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+ revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+ TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+ HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 16]
+