diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc3250.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3250.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc3250.txt | 395 |
1 files changed, 395 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3250.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3250.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..62dcdad --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3250.txt @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group L. McIntyre +Request for Comments: 3250 Xerox Corporation +Category: Standards Track G. Parsons + Nortel Networks + J. Rafferty + Brooktrout Technology + September 2002 + + + Tag Image File Format Fax eXtended (TIFF-FX) - image/tiff-fx + MIME Sub-type Registration + +Status of this Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. + +Abstract + + This document describes the registration of the MIME sub-type + image/tiff-fx. The encodings are defined by File Format for Internet + Fax and its extensions. + +1. Conventions used in this document + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [REQ]. + +2. Overview + + This document describes the registration of the MIME sub-type + image/tiff-fx. The encodings are defined by File Format for Internet + Fax [TIFF-FX] and its extensions. + +3. Internet Fax Working Group + + This document is a product of the IETF Internet Fax Working Group. + All comments on this document should be forwarded to the email + distribution list at <ietf-fax@imc.org>. + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 3250 image/tiff-fx September 2002 + + +3. TIFF-FX Definition + + TIFF-FX (Tag Image File Format Fax eXtended), is defined in detail by + RFC 2301 "File Format for Internet Fax" [TIFF-FX]. + + While a brief scope and feature description is provided in this + section as background information, the reader is directed to the + original TIFF-FX specification (File Format for Internet Fax) to + obtain complete feature and technical details. + +3.1 TIFF-FX Scope + + This document defines a TIFF-based file format specification for + enabling standardized messaging-based fax over the Internet. It + specifies the TIFF fields and field values required for compatibility + with the existing ITU-T Recommendations for Group 3 black-and-white, + grayscale and color facsimile. TIFF has historically been used for + handling fax image files in applications such as store-and-forward + messaging. Implementations that support this file format + specification for import/export may elect to support it as a native + format. This document recommends a TIFF file structure that is + compatible with low-memory and page-level streaming implementations. + + Unless otherwise noted, the current TIFF specification [TIFF] and + selected TIFF Technical Notes [TTN1, TTN2] are the primary references + for describing TIFF and defining TIFF fields. This document is the + primary reference for defining TIFF field values for fax + applications. + +3.2 TIFF-FX Features + + Some of the features of TIFF-FX are: + + - TIFF-FX is capable of describing bilevel, grayscale, palette- + color, full-color and mixed content image data. + + - TIFF-FX includes a number of compression schemes that allow + developers to choose the best space or time tradeoff for their + applications. + + - TIFF-FX is designed to be extensible and to evolve gracefully + as new needs arise. + + + + + + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 3250 image/tiff-fx September 2002 + + +4. MIME Definition + + This document defines the image/tiff-fx MIME sub-type to refer to + TIFF-FX Profiles J, C, L and M encoded image data and any future + TIFF-FX extensions, or a subset. The image/tiff-fx content type may + be used when black-and-white image data is encoded using TIFF-FX + Profiles S or F, or a subset. + +5. IANA Registration + + To: ietf-types@iana.org + Subject: Registration of Standard MIME media type image/tiff-fx + + MIME media type name: image + + MIME subtype name: tiff-fx + + Required parameters: none + + Optional parameters: none + + Encoding Considerations: This media type consists of binary + data. The base64 encoding should be used on transports that + cannot accommodate binary data directly. + + Security considerations: + + TIFF-FX utilizes a structure which can store image data and + attributes of this image data. The fields defined in the + TIFF-FX specification are of a descriptive nature and provide + information that is useful to facilitate viewing and + rendering of images by a recipient. As such, the fields + currently defined in the TIFF-FX specification do not in + themselves create additional security risks, since the + fields are not used to induce any particular behavior by the + recipient application. + + TIFF-FX has an extensible structure, so that it is + theoretically possible that fields could be defined in the + future which could be used to induce particular actions on + the part of the recipient, thus presenting additional + security risks, but this type of capability is not supported + in the referenced TIFF-FX specification. Indeed, the + definition of fields which would include such processing + instructions is inconsistent with the goals and spirit of the + TIFF-FX specification. + + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 3250 image/tiff-fx September 2002 + + + Interoperability considerations: + + The ability of implementations to handle all the defined + applications (or profiles within applications) of TIFF-FX may + not be ubiquitous. As a result, implementations may decode + and attempt to display the encoded TIFF-FX image data only to + determine that the image cannot be rendered. + + Published specification: + + TIFF-FX (Tag Image File Format Fax eXtended) is defined in: + + RFC 2301 "File Format for Internet Fax", January 1998 + McIntyre, L., Zilles, S., Buckley, R., Venable, D., + Parsons, G., and J. Rafferty. + + Applications which use this media type: + + Imaging, fax, messaging and multi-media + + Additional information: + + Magic number(s): + II (little-endian): 49 49 2A 00 hex + MM (big-endian): 4D 4D 00 2A hex + File extension(s): .TFX + Macintosh File Type Code(s): TFX + + Person & email address to contact for further information: + + Lloyd McIntyre + lmcintyre@xerox.com + + Glenn W. Parsons + gparsons@nortelnetworks.com + + James Rafferty + jraff@brooktrout.com + + Intended usage: COMMON + + Change controller: Lloyd McIntyre + + + + + + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 3250 image/tiff-fx September 2002 + + +6. Security Considerations + + Security issues for this media type are discussed in the security + considerations section of the media type registration that appears in + section 5. + +7. References + + [REQ] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [MIME1] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail + Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message + Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996. + + [MIME4] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail + Extensions (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures", BCP + 13, RFC 2048, November 1996. + + [TIFF] Adobe Developers Association, TIFF (TM) Revision 6.0 - + Final, June 3, 1992. + + [TPC.INT] C. Malamud, M. Rose, "Principles of Operation for the + TPC.INT Subdomain: Remote Printing -- Technical + Procedures", RFC 1528, 10/06/1993 + + [TIFF-FX] McIntyre, L., Zilles, S., Buckley, R., Venable, D., + Parsons, G. and J. Rafferty, "File Format for Internet + Fax", RFC 2301, January 1998. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 3250 image/tiff-fx September 2002 + + +Annex A. List of edits to TIFF-FX Registration + + +----+---------+-------------------------------------------------+ + | No.| Section | Edit Nov. 21, 2000 | + +----+---------+-------------------------------------------------+ + | 1. | 7.0 | Corrected Magic Number from 49 49 42 00 hex and | + | | | 4D 4D 00 42 hex to 49 49 2A 00 hex and | + | | | 4D 4D 00 2A hex respectively. | + +----+---------+-------------------------------------------------+ + +Authors' Addresses + + Lloyd McIntyre + Xerox Corporation + 3400 Hillview Avenue + Palo Alto, CA 94304 + USA + + Phone: +1-650 813 6762 + Fax: +1-650 813 5850 + EMail: lmcintyre@pahv.xerox.com + + + Glenn W. Parsons + Nortel Networks + P.O. Box 3511, Station C + Ottawa, ON K1Y 4H7 + Canada + + Phone: +1-613-763-7582 + Fax: +1-613-763-2697 + EMail: gparsons@nortelnetworks.com + + + James Rafferty + Brooktrout Technology + 410 First Avenue + Needham, MA 02494 + USA + + Phone: +1-781-433-9462 + Fax: +1-781-433-9268 + EMail: jraff@brooktrout.com + + + + + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6] + +RFC 3250 image/tiff-fx September 2002 + + +Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. + + This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to + others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it + or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published + and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any + kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are + included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this + document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing + the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other + Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of + developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for + copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be + followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than + English. + + The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be + revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. + + This document and the information contained herein is provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING + TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING + BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION + HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the + Internet Society. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +McIntyre, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7] + |