diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc3595.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3595.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc3595.txt | 339 |
1 files changed, 339 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3595.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3595.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..02c955f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3595.txt @@ -0,0 +1,339 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group B. Wijnen +Request for Comments: 3595 Lucent Technologies +Category: Standards Track September 2003 + + + Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label + +Status of this Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. + +Abstract + + This MIB module defines textual conventions to represent the commonly + used IPv6 Flow Label. The intent is that these textual conventions + (TCs) will be imported and used in MIB modules that would otherwise + define their own representations. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 3. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 5. Intellectual Property Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 8. Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 9. Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 + + + + + + + + + + + + +Wijnen Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 3595 Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label September 2003 + + +1. Introduction + + Several standards-track MIB modules have defined objects to represent + an IPv6 Flow Label (sometimes referred to as Flow ID) [RFC2460] + [FLOWLABEL] and IPv6 Flow Label filters. Unfortunately the result is + a set of different definitions for the same piece of management + information. This may lead to confusion and unnecessary complexity. + + This document defines a set of textual conventions (TCs) that can and + should be (re-)used in MIB modules, so that they all represent an + IPv6 Flow Label in the same way. In fact, PIB modules can and should + also use these TCs when they need to represent an IPv6 Flow label. + +2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework + + For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current + Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of + RFC 3410 [RFC3410]. + + Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed + the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally + accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). + Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the + Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB + module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, + RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580 + [RFC2580]. + +3. Definitions + + IPV6-FLOW-LABEL-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN + + IMPORTS + + MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI + TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC; + + ipv6FlowLabelMIB MODULE-IDENTITY + + LAST-UPDATED "200308280000Z" -- 28 August 2003 + ORGANIZATION "IETF Operations and Management Area" + CONTACT-INFO "Bert Wijnen (Editor) + Lucent Technologies + Schagen 33 + 3461 GL Linschoten + Netherlands + + + + + +Wijnen Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 3595 Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label September 2003 + + + Phone: +31 348-407-775 + EMail: bwijnen@lucent.com + + Send comments to <mibs@ops.ietf.org>. + " + DESCRIPTION "This MIB module provides commonly used textual + conventions for IPv6 Flow Labels. + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). This + version of this MIB module is part of RFC 3595, + see the RFC itself for full legal notices. + " + -- Revision History + + REVISION "200308280000Z" -- 28 August 2003 + DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published as RFC 3595." + + ::= { mib-2 103 } + + IPv6FlowLabel ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + DISPLAY-HINT "d" + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or Flow Label in an IPv6 + packet header that may be used to discriminate + traffic flows. + " + REFERENCE "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) specification, + section 6. RFC 2460. + " + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..1048575) + + IPv6FlowLabelOrAny ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + DISPLAY-HINT "d" + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or Flow Label in an IPv6 + packet header that may be used to discriminate + traffic flows. The value of -1 is used to + indicate a wildcard, i.e. any value. + " + SYNTAX Integer32 (-1 | 0..1048575) + + END + + + + + + + + + +Wijnen Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 3595 Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label September 2003 + + +4. Security Considerations + + The MIB module contained in this memo does not define any management + objects. Instead, it defines a set of textual conventions which may + be used by other MIB modules to define management objects. + + Meaningful security considerations can only be written for MIB + modules that define concrete management objects. This document has + therefore no impact on the security of the Internet. + +5. Intellectual Property Statement + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it + has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the + IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and + standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of + claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of + licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to + obtain a general license or permission for the use of such + proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can + be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive + Director. + +6. References + +6.1. Normative References + + [RFC2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 + (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998. + + [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and Schoenwaelder, "Structure + of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC + 2578, April 1999. + + [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder,"Textual + Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999. + + + + + + +Wijnen Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 3595 Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label September 2003 + + + [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder, + "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, + April 1999. + +6.2. Informative References + + [FLOWLABEL] Carpenter, B., Conta, A., Deering, S. and J. Rajahalme, + "IPv6 Flow Label Specification", Work in Progress. + + [RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, + "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet- + Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002. + +7. Acknowledgments + + This document was produced as a result of a review of the use of + FlowID in a PIB module and a MIB module. Further investigation found + that FlowID and FlowLabel objects were defined in a few other MIB + modules. The editor would like to thank all who contributed to the + discussion that resulted in this document, particularly Juergen + Schoenwaelder for finding and reporting most of the other MIB modules + that were using/defining a FlowLabel object. Juergen also suggested + the very first direction for a common TC for these objects. Further + contributions were received from Fred Baker, Dan Romascanu, Kwok Ho + Chan, Margaret Wasserman, Brian Carpenter, Andy Bierman, Randy + Presuhn, Branislav Meandzija, Brian Williams, Ravi Sahita. We also + received initial input from 3GPP that expressed the requirement to be + able to specify a wildcard for FlowID or FlowLabel. Further helpful + review comments were received from Brian Carpenter, John Loughney, + Pekka Savola. + +8. Author's Address + + Bert Wijnen + Lucent Technologies + Schagen 33 + 3461 GL Linschoten + Netherlands + + Phone: +31-348-407-775 + EMail: bwijnen@lucent.com + + + + + + + + + + +Wijnen Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 3595 Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label September 2003 + + +9. Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. + + This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to + others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it + or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published + and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any + kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are + included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this + document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing + the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other + Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of + developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for + copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be + followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than + English. + + The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be + revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees. + + This document and the information contained herein is provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING + TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING + BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION + HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the + Internet Society. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Wijnen Standards Track [Page 6] + |