diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt | 899 |
1 files changed, 899 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..48d656e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt @@ -0,0 +1,899 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group R. Harrison +Request for Comments: 4373 J. Sermersheim +Category: Informational Novell, Inc. + Y. Dong + January 2006 + + + Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) + Bulk Update/Replication Protocol (LBURP) + +Status of This Memo + + This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does + not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this + memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). + +Abstract + + The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Bulk + Update/Replication Protocol (LBURP) allows an LDAP client to perform + a bulk update to an LDAP server. The protocol frames a sequenced set + of update operations within a pair of LDAP extended operations to + notify the server that the update operations in the framed set are + related in such a way that the ordering of all operations can be + preserved during processing even when they are sent asynchronously by + the client. Update operations can be grouped within a single + protocol message to maximize the efficiency of client-server + communication. + + The protocol is suitable for efficiently making a substantial set of + updates to the entries in an LDAP server. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................3 + 2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................3 + 3. Overview of Protocol ............................................3 + 3.1. Update Initiation ..........................................4 + 3.2. Update Stream ..............................................4 + 3.2.1. LBURPUpdateRequest ..................................4 + 3.2.2. LBURPUpdateResponse .................................4 + 3.3. Update Termination .........................................4 + 3.4. Applicability of Protocol ..................................5 + 4. Description of Protocol Flow ....................................5 + 5. Elements of Protocol ............................................6 + 5.1. StartLBURPRequest ..........................................7 + 5.1.1. updateStyleOID ......................................7 + 5.2. StartLBURPResponse .........................................7 + 5.2.1. maxOperations .......................................8 + 5.3. LBURPUpdateRequest .........................................8 + 5.3.1. sequenceNumber ......................................8 + 5.3.2. UpdateOperationList .................................9 + 5.4. LBURPUpdateResponse ........................................9 + 5.4.1. OperationResults ...................................10 + 5.4.1.1. operationNumber ...........................10 + 5.4.1.2. ldapResult ................................10 + 5.5. EndLBURPRequest ...........................................10 + 5.5.1. sequenceNumber .....................................10 + 5.6. EndLBURPResponse ..........................................11 + 6. Semantics of the Incremental Update Style ......................11 + 7. General LBURP Semantics ........................................11 + 8. Security Considerations ........................................12 + 9. IANA Considerations ............................................13 + 9.1. LDAP Object Identifier Registrations ......................13 + 10. Normative References ..........................................14 + 11. Informative References ........................................14 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +1. Introduction + + The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Bulk + Update/Replication Protocol (LBURP) arose from the need to allow an + LDAP client to efficiently present large quantities of updates to an + LDAP server and have the LDAP server efficiently process them. LBURP + introduces a minimum of new operational functionality to the LDAP + protocol because the update requests sent by the client encapsulate + standard LDAP [RFC2251] update operations. However, this protocol + greatly facilitates bulk updates by allowing the client to send the + update operations asynchronously and still allow the server to + maintain proper ordering of the operations. It also allows the + server to recognize the client's intent to perform a potentially + large set of update operations and then to change its processing + strategy to more efficiently process the operations. + +2. Conventions Used in This Document + + Imperative keywords defined in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] are used in this + document, and carry the meanings described there. + + All Basic Encoding Rules (BER) [X.690] encodings follow the + conventions found in section 5.1 of [RFC2251]. + + The term "supplier" applies to an LDAP client or an LDAP server + (acting as a client) that supplies a set of update operations to a + consumer. + + The term "consumer" applies to an LDAP server that consumes (i.e., + processes) the sequenced set of update operations sent to it by a + supplier. + +3. Overview of Protocol + + LBURP frames a set of update operations within a pair of LDAP + extended operations that mark the beginning and end of the update + set. These updates are sent via LDAP extended operations, each + containing a sequence number and a list of one or more update + operations to be performed by the consumer. Except for the fact that + they are grouped together as part of a larger LDAP message, the + update operations in each subset are encoded as LDAP update + operations and use the LDAP Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) + [X.680] message types specified in [RFC2251]. + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +3.1. Update Initiation + + The protocol is initiated when a supplier sends a StartLBURPRequest + extended operation to a consumer as a notification that a stream of + associated LBURPUpdateRequests will follow. The supplier associates + semantics with this stream of requests by including the Object + Identifier (OID) of the bulk update/replication style in the + StartLBURPRequest. The consumer responds to the StartLBURPRequest + with a StartLBURPResponse message. + +3.2. Update Stream + + After the consumer responds with a StartLBURPResponse, the supplier + sends a stream of LBURPUpdateRequest messages to the consumer. + Messages within this stream may be sent asynchronously to maximize + the efficiency of the transfer. The consumer responds to each + LBURPUpdateRequest with an LBURPUpdateResponse message. + +3.2.1. LBURPUpdateRequest + + Each LBURPUpdateRequest contains a sequence number identifying its + relative position within the update stream and an UpdateOperationList + containing an ordered list of LDAP update operations to be applied to + the Directory Information Tree (DIT). The sequence number enables + the consumer to process LBURPUpdateRequest messages in the order they + were sent by the supplier even when they are sent asynchronously. + The consumer processes each LBURPUpdateRequest according to the + sequence number by applying the LDAP update operations in its + UpdateOperationList to the DIT in the order they are listed. + +3.2.2. LBURPUpdateResponse + + When the consumer has processed the update operations from an + UpdateOperationList, it sends an LBURPUpdateResponse to the supplier + indicating the success or failure of the update operations contained + within the corresponding LBURPUpdateRequest. + +3.3. Update Termination + + After the supplier has sent all of its LBURPUpdateRequest messages, + it sends an EndLBURPRequest message to the consumer to terminate the + update stream. Upon servicing all LBURPOperation requests and + receiving the EndLBURPRequest, the consumer responds with an + EndLBURPResponse, and the update is complete. + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +3.4. Applicability of Protocol + + LBURP is designed to facilitate the bulk update of LDAP servers. It + can also be used to synchronize directory information between a + single master and multiple slaves. + + No attempt is made to deal with the issues associated with multiple- + master replication environments (such as keeping modification times + of attribute values) so that updates to the same entry on different + replicas can be correctly ordered. For this reason, when LBURP alone + is used for replication, proper convergence of the data between all + replicas can only be assured in a single-master replication + environment. + +4. Description of Protocol Flow + + This section describes the LBURP protocol flow and the information + contained in each protocol message. Throughout this section, the + client or server acting as a supplier is indicated by the letter "S", + and the server acting as a consumer is indicated by the letter "C". + The construct "S -> C" indicates that the supplier is sending an LDAP + message to the consumer, and "C -> S" indicates that the consumer is + sending an LDAP message to the supplier. Note that the protocol flow + below assumes that a properly authenticated LDAP session has already + been established between the supplier and consumer. + + S -> C: StartLBURPRequest message. The parameter is: + + 1) OID for the LBURP update style (see section 5.1.1). + + C -> S: StartLBURPResponse message. The parameter is: + + 1) An optional maxOperations instruction + (see section 5.2.1). + + S -> C: An update stream consisting of zero or more + LBURPUpdateRequest messages. The requests MAY be sent + asynchronously. The parameters are: + + 1) A sequence number specifying the order of + this LBURPUpdateRequest with respect to the + other LBURPUpdateRequest messages in the update + stream (see section 5.3.1). + + 2) LBURPUpdateRequest.updateOperationList, a list + of one or more LDAP update operations (see section + 5.3.2). + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 5] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + + The consumer processes the LBURPUpdateRequest messages + in the order of their sequence numbers and applies the + LDAP update operations contained within each + LBURPUpdateRequest to the DIT in the order they are + listed. + + C -> S: LBURPUpdateResponse message. This is sent when the + consumer completes processing the update operations + from each LBURPUpdateRequest.updateOperationList. + + S -> C: EndLBURPRequest message. This is sent after the + supplier sends all of its LBURPUpdateRequest messages + to the consumer. The parameter is: + + 1) A sequence number that is one greater than the + sequence number of the last LBURPUpdateRequest + message in the update stream. This allows the + EndLBURPRequest to also be sent asynchronously. + + C -> S: EndLBURPResponse message. This is sent in response to + the EndLBURPRequest after the consumer has serviced + all LBURPOperation requests. + +5. Elements of Protocol + + LBURP uses two LDAP ExtendedRequest messages--StartLBURPRequest and + EndLBURPRequest--to initiate and terminate the protocol. A third + LDAP ExtendedRequest message--LBURPUpdateRequest--is used to send + update operations from the supplier to the consumer. These three + requests along with their corresponding responses comprise the entire + protocol. + + LBURP request messages are defined in terms of the LDAP + ExtendedRequest [RFC2251] as follows: + + ExtendedRequest ::= [APPLICATION 23] SEQUENCE { + requestName [0] LDAPOID, + requestValue [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL + } + + LBURP response messages are defined in terms of the LDAP + ExtendedResponse [RFC2251] as follows: + + ExtendedResponse ::= [APPLICATION 24] SEQUENCE { + COMPONENTS of LDAPResult, + responseName [10] LDAPOID OPTIONAL, + response [11] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL + } + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 6] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +5.1. StartLBURPRequest + + The requestName value of the StartLBURPRequest is OID 1.3.6.1.1.17.1. + + The requestValue of the StartLBURPRequest contains the BER-encoding + of the following ASN.1: + + StartLBURPRequestValue ::= SEQUENCE { + updateStyleOID LDAPOID + } + + LDAPOID is defined in [RFC2251], section 4.1.2. + +5.1.1. updateStyleOID + + The updateStyleOID is an OID that uniquely identifies the LBURP + update style being used. This document defines one LBURP update + semantic style that can be transmitted between the StartLBURPRequest + and EndLBURPRequest. The updateStyleOID is included in the protocol + for future expansion of additional update styles. For example, a + future specification might define an update style with semantics to + replace all existing entries with a new set of entries and thus only + allows the Add operation. + + The updateStyleOID for the LBURP Incremental Update style is + 1.3.6.1.1.17.7. The semantics of this update style are described in + section 6. + +5.2. StartLBURPResponse + + The responseName of the StartLBURPResponse is the OID 1.3.6.1.1.17.2. + + The optional response element contains the BER-encoding of the + following ASN.1: + + StartLBURPResponseValue ::= maxOperations + + maxOperations ::= INTEGER (0 .. maxInt) + + maxInt INTEGER ::= 2147483647 -- (2^^31 - 1) -- + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 7] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +5.2.1. maxOperations + + When present, the value of maxOperations instructs the supplier to + send no more than that number of update operations per + LBURPUpdateRequest.updateOperationList (see section 5.3.2). If the + consumer does not send a maxOperations value, it MUST be prepared to + accept any number of update operations per + LBURPUpdateRequest.updateOperationList. The supplier MAY send fewer + but MUST NOT send more than maxOperations update operations in a + single LBURPUpdateRequest.updateOperationList. + +5.3. LBURPUpdateRequest + + The LBURPUpdateRequest message is used to send a set of zero or more + LDAP update operations from the supplier to the consumer along with + sequencing information that enables the consumer to maintain the + proper sequencing of multiple asynchronous LBURPUpdateRequest + messages. + + The requestName of the LBURPUpdateRequest is the OID 1.3.6.1.1.17.5. + + The requestValue of an LBURPOperation contains the BER-encoding of + the following ASN.1: + + LBURPUpdateRequestValue ::= SEQUENCE { + sequenceNumber INTEGER (1 .. maxInt), + updateOperationList UpdateOperationList + } + +5.3.1. sequenceNumber + + The sequenceNumber orders associated LBURPOperation requests. This + enables the consumer to process LBURPOperation requests in the order + specified by the supplier. The supplier MUST set the value of + sequenceNumber of the first LBURPUpdateRequest to 1, and MUST + increment the value of sequenceNumber by 1 for each succeeding + LBURPUpdateRequest. In the unlikely event that the number of + LBURPUpdateRequest messages exceeds maxInt, a sequenceNumber value of + 1 is deemed to be the succeeding sequence number following a sequence + number of maxInt. + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 8] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +5.3.2. UpdateOperationList + + The UpdateOperationList is a list of one or more standard LDAP update + requests and is defined as follows: + + UpdateOperationList ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE{ + updateOperation CHOICE { + addRequest AddRequest, + modifyRequest ModifyRequest, + delRequest DelRequest, + modDNRequest ModifyDNRequest + }, + controls [0] Controls OPTIONAL + } + + AddRequest, ModifyRequest, DelRequest, and ModifyDNRequest are + defined in [RFC2251], sections 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, and 4.9. + + The LDAP update requests in the UpdateOperationList MUST be applied + to the DIT in the order in which they are listed. + +5.4. LBURPUpdateResponse + + An LBURPUpdateResponse message is sent from the consumer to the + supplier to signal that all of the update operations from the + UpdateOperationList of an LBURPUpdateRequest have been completed and + to give the results for the update operations from that list. + + The responseName of the LBURPUpdateResponse is the OID + 1.3.6.1.1.17.6. + + If the consumer server cannot successfully decode an + LBURPUpdateRequest in its entirety, the resultCode for the + corresponding LBURPUpdateResponse is set to protocolError and the + response element is omitted. Updates from the LBURPUpdateRequest + SHALL NOT be committed to the DIT in this circumstance. + + If the status of all of the update operations being reported by an + LBURPUpdateResponse message is success, the resultCode of the + LBURPUpdateResponse message is set to success and the response + element is omitted. + + If the status of any of the update operations being reported by an + LBURPUpdateResponse message is something other than success, the + resultCode for the entire LBURPUpdateResponse is set to other to + signal that the response element is present. + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 9] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +5.4.1. OperationResults + + When a response element is included in an LBURPUpdateResponse + message, it contains the BER-encoding of the following ASN.1: + + OperationResults ::= SEQUENCE OF OperationResult + + OperationResult ::= SEQUENCE { + operationNumber INTEGER, + ldapResult LDAPResult + } + + An OperationResult is included for each operation from the + UpdateOperationList that failed during processing. + +5.4.1.1. operationNumber + + The operationNumber identifies the LDAP update operation from the + UpdateOperationList of the LBURPUpdateRequest that failed. + Operations are numbered beginning at 1. + +5.4.1.2. ldapResult + + The ldapResult included in the OperationResult is the same ldapResult + that would be sent for the update operation that failed if it had + failed while being processed as a normal LDAP update operation. + LDAPResult is defined in [RFC2251], section 4.1.10. + +5.5. EndLBURPRequest + + The requestName of the EndLBURPRequest is the OID 1.3.6.1.1.17.3. + + The requestValue contains the BER-encoding of the following ASN.1: + + EndLBURPRequestValue::= SEQUENCE { + sequenceNumber INTEGER (1 .. maxInt) + } + +5.5.1. sequenceNumber + + The value in sequenceNumber is one greater than the last + LBURPUpdateRequest.sequenceNumber in the update stream. It allows + the server to know when it has received all outstanding asynchronous + LBURPUpdateRequests. + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 10] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +5.6. EndLBURPResponse + + The responseName of the EndLBURPResponse is the OID 1.3.6.1.1.17.4. + + There is no response element in the EndLBURPResponse message. + +6. Semantics of the Incremental Update Style + + The initial state of entries in the consumer's DIT plus the + LBURPUpdateRequest messages in the update stream collectively + represent the desired final state of the consumer's DIT. All LDAP + update operations defined in [RFC2251]--Add, Modify, Delete, and + Modify DN--are allowed in the incremental update stream. All of the + semantics of those operations are in effect, so for instance, an + attempt to add an entry that already exists will fail just as it + would during a normal LDAP Add operation. + +7. General LBURP Semantics + + The consumer server may take any action required to efficiently + process the updates sent via LBURP, as long as the final state is + equivalent to that which would have been achieved if the updates in + the update stream had been applied to the DIT using normal LDAP + update operations. + + The LBURPUpdateRequest messages that form the update stream MAY be + sent asynchronously by the supplier to the consumer. This means that + the supplier need not wait for an LBURPUpdateResponse message for one + LBURPUpdateRequest message before sending the next LBURPUpdateRequest + message. + + When the LBURP update stream contains a request that affects multiple + Directory System Agents (DSAs), the consumer MAY choose to perform + the request or return a resultCode value of affectsMultipleDSAs. As + with any LDAP operation, a consumer MAY send a resultCode value of + referral as part of the OperationResult element for any operation on + an entry that it does not contain. If the consumer is configured to + do so, it MAY chain on behalf of the supplier to complete the update + operation instead. + + While a consumer server is processing an LBURP update stream, it may + choose not to service LDAP requests on other connections. This + provision is designed to allow implementers the freedom to implement + highly-efficient methods of handling the update stream without being + constrained by the need to maintain a live, working DIT database + while doing so. + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 11] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + + If a consumer chooses to refuse LDAP operation requests from other + suppliers during LBURP update, it is RECOMMENDED that the consumer + refer those requests to another server that has the appropriate data + to complete the operation. + + Unless attribute values specifying timestamps are included as part of + the update stream, updates made using LBURP are treated the same as + other LDAP operations wherein they are deemed to occur at the + present. Consumers MAY store timestamp values sent by suppliers but + are not required to do so. + + Implementations may choose to perform the operations in the update + stream with special permissions to improve performance. + + Consumer implementations should include functionality to detect and + terminate connections on which an LBURP session has been initiated + but information (such as the EndLBURPRequest) needed to complete the + LBURP session is never received. A timeout is one mechanism that can + be used to accomplish this. + +8. Security Considerations + + Implementations should ensure that a supplier making an LBURP request + is properly authenticated and authorized to make the updates + requested. There is a potential for loss of data if updates are made + to the DIT without proper authorization. If LBURP is used for + replication, implementers should note that unlike other replication + protocols, no existing replication agreement between supplier and + consumer is required. These risks increase if the consumer server + also processes the update stream with special permissions to improve + performance. For these reasons, implementers should carefully + consider which permissions should be required to perform LBURP + operations and take steps to ensure that only connections with + appropriate authorization are allowed to perform them. + + The data contained in the update stream may contain passwords and + other sensitive data. Care should be taken to properly safeguard + this information while in transit between supplier and consumer. The + StartTLS [RFC2830] operation is one mechanism that can be used to + provide data confidentiality and integrity services for this purpose. + + As with any asynchronous LDAP operation, it may be possible for an + LBURP supplier to send asynchronous LBURPUpdateRequest messages to + the consumer faster than the consumer can process them. Consumer + implementers should take steps to prevent LBURP suppliers from + interfering with the normal operation of a consumer server by issuing + a rapid stream of asynchronous LBURPUpdateRequest messages. + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 12] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +9. IANA Considerations + + Registration of the following values has been made by the IANA + [RFC3383]. + +9.1. LDAP Object Identifier Registrations + + The IANA has registered LDAP Object Identifiers identifying the + protocol elements defined in this technical specification. The + following registration template was provided: + + Subject: Request for LDAP OID Registration + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Roger Harrison + rharrison@novell.com + Specification: RFC 4373 + Author/Change Controller: IESG + Comments: + Seven delegations will be made under the assigned OID. The + following 6 OIDs are Protocol Mechanism OIDs of type "E" + (supportedExtension): + + 1.3.6.1.1.17.1 StartLBURPRequest LDAP ExtendedRequest message + 1.3.6.1.1.17.2 StartLBURPResponse LDAP ExtendedResponse message + 1.3.6.1.1.17.3 EndLBURPRequest LDAP ExtendedRequest message + 1.3.6.1.1.17.4 EndLBURPResponse LDAP ExtendedResponse message + 1.3.6.1.1.17.5 LBURPUpdateRequest LDAP ExtendedRequest message + 1.3.6.1.1.17.6 LBURPUpdateResponse LDAP ExtendedResponse message + + The following 1 OID is a Protocol Mechanism OID of type "F" + (supportedFeature): + + 1.3.6.1.1.17.7 LBURP Incremental Update style OID + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 13] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +10. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC2251] Wahl, M., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory + Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997. + + [RFC3383] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) + Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access + Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 3383, September 2002. + + [X.680] ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (07/2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002 + "Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One + (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation" + + [X.690] ITU-T Rec. X.690 (07/2002) | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002, + "Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: + Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical + Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules + (DER)", 2002. + +11. Informative References + + [RFC2830] Hodges, J., Morgan, R., and M. Wahl, "Lightweight + Directory Access Protocol (v3): Extension for Transport + Layer Security", RFC 2830, May 2000. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 14] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +Authors' Addresses + + Roger Harrison + Novell, Inc. + 1800 S. Novell Place + Provo, UT 84606 + + Phone: +1 801 861 2642 + EMail: rharrison@novell.com + + + Jim Sermersheim + Novell, Inc. + 1800 S. Novell Place + Provo, UT 84606 + + Phone: +1 801 861 3088 + EMail: jimse@novell.com + + + Yulin Dong + + EMail: yulindong@gmail.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 15] + +RFC 4373 LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol January 2006 + + +Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). + + This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions + contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors + retain all their rights. + + This document and the information contained herein are provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS + OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET + ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, + INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE + INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED + WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Intellectual Property + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has + made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information + on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be + found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. + + Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any + assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an + attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of + such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this + specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at + http://www.ietf.org/ipr. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at + ietf-ipr@ietf.org. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF + Administrative Support Activity (IASA). + + + + + + + +Harrison, et al. Informational [Page 16] + |