diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4527.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4527.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc4527.txt | 451 |
1 files changed, 451 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4527.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4527.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..de6e5d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4527.txt @@ -0,0 +1,451 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group K. Zeilenga +Request for Comments: 4527 OpenLDAP Foundation +Category: Standards Track June 2006 + + + Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) + Read Entry Controls + + +Status of This Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). + +Abstract + + This document specifies an extension to the Lightweight Directory + Access Protocol (LDAP) to allow the client to read the target entry + of an update operation. The client may request to read the entry + before and/or after the modifications are applied. These reads are + done as an atomic part of the update operation. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Background and Intent of Use ....................................2 + 2. Terminology .....................................................2 + 3. Read Entry Controls .............................................3 + 3.1. The Pre-Read Controls ......................................3 + 3.2. The Post-Read Controls .....................................3 + 4. Interaction with Other Controls .................................4 + 5. Security Considerations .........................................4 + 6. IANA Considerations .............................................5 + 6.1. Object Identifier ..........................................5 + 6.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanisms ...................................5 + 7. Acknowledgement .................................................5 + 8. References ......................................................6 + 8.1. Normative References .......................................6 + 8.2. Informative References .....................................7 + + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + +1. Background and Intent of Use + + This document specifies an extension to the Lightweight Directory + Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510] to allow the client to read the + target entry of an update operation (e.g., Add, Delete, Modify, + ModifyDN). The extension utilizes controls [RFC4511] attached to + update requests to request and return copies of the target entry. + One request control, called the Pre-Read request control, indicates + that a copy of the entry before application of update is to be + returned. Another control, called the Post-Read request control, + indicates that a copy of the entry after application of the update is + to be returned. Each request control has a corresponding response + control used to return the entry. + + To ensure proper isolation, the controls are processed as an atomic + part of the update operation. + + The functionality offered by these controls is based upon similar + functionality in the X.500 Directory Access Protocol (DAP) [X.511]. + + The Pre-Read controls may be used to obtain replaced or deleted + values of modified attributes or a copy of the entry being deleted. + + The Post-Read controls may be used to obtain values of operational + attributes, such as the 'entryUUID' [RFC4530] and 'modifyTimestamp' + [RFC4512] attributes, updated by the server as part of the update + operation. + +2. Terminology + + Protocol elements are described using ASN.1 [X.680] with implicit + tags. The term "BER-encoded" means the element is to be encoded + using the Basic Encoding Rules [X.690] under the restrictions + detailed in Section 5.1 of [RFC4511]. + + DN stands for Distinguished Name. + DSA stands for Directory System Agent (i.e., a directory server). + DSE stands for DSA-specific Entry. + + In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", + "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", + and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 + [RFC2119]. + + + + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + +3. Read Entry Controls + +3.1. The Pre-Read Controls + + The Pre-Read request and response controls are identified by the + 1.3.6.1.1.13.1 object identifier. Servers implementing these + controls SHOULD publish 1.3.6.1.1.13.1 as a value of the + 'supportedControl' [RFC4512] in their root DSE. + + The Pre-Read request control is a LDAP Control [RFC4511] whose + controlType is 1.3.6.1.1.13.1 and whose controlValue is a BER-encoded + AttributeSelection [RFC4511], as extended by [RFC3673]. The + criticality may be TRUE or FALSE. This control is appropriate for + the modifyRequest, delRequest, and modDNRequest LDAP messages. + + The corresponding response control is a LDAP Control whose + controlType is 1.3.6.1.1.13.1 and whose the controlValue, an OCTET + STRING, contains a BER-encoded SearchResultEntry. The criticality + may be TRUE or FALSE. This control is appropriate for the + modifyResponse, delResponse, and modDNResponse LDAP messages with a + resultCode of success (0). + + When the request control is attached to an appropriate update LDAP + request, the control requests the return of a copy of the target + entry prior to the application of the update. The AttributeSelection + indicates, as discussed in [RFC4511][RFC3673], which attributes are + requested to appear in the copy. The server is to return a + SearchResultEntry containing, subject to access controls and other + constraints, values of the requested attributes. + + The normal processing of the update operation and the processing of + this control MUST be performed as one atomic action isolated from + other update operations. + + If the update operation fails (in either normal or control + processing), no Pre-Read response control is provided. + +3.2. The Post-Read Controls + + The Post-Read request and response controls are identified by the + 1.3.6.1.1.13.2 object identifier. Servers implementing these + controls SHOULD publish 1.3.6.1.1.13.2 as a value of the + 'supportedControl' [RFC4512] in their root DSE. + + The Post-Read request control is a LDAP Control [RFC4511] whose + controlType is 1.3.6.1.1.13.2 and whose controlValue, an OCTET + STRING, contains a BER-encoded AttributeSelection [RFC4511], as + extended by [RFC3673]. The criticality may be TRUE or FALSE. This + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + + control is appropriate for the addRequest, modifyRequest, and + modDNRequest LDAP messages. + + The corresponding response control is a LDAP Control whose + controlType is 1.3.6.1.1.13.2 and whose controlValue is a BER-encoded + SearchResultEntry. The criticality may be TRUE or FALSE. This + control is appropriate for the addResponse, modifyResponse, and + modDNResponse LDAP messages with a resultCode of success (0). + + When the request control is attached to an appropriate update LDAP + request, the control requests the return of a copy of the target + entry after the application of the update. The AttributeSelection + indicates, as discussed in [RFC4511][RFC3673], which attributes are + requested to appear in the copy. The server is to return a + SearchResultEntry containing, subject to access controls and other + constraints, values of the requested attributes. + + The normal processing of the update operation and the processing of + this control MUST be performed as one atomic action isolated from + other update operations. + + If the update operation fails (in either normal or control + processing), no Post-Read response control is provided. + +4. Interaction with Other Controls + + The Pre-Read and Post-Read controls may be combined with each other + and/or with a variety of other controls. When combined with the + assertion control [RFC4528] and/or the manageDsaIT control [RFC3296], + the semantics of each control included in the combination applies. + The Pre-Read and Post-Read controls may be combined with other + controls as detailed in other technical specifications. + +5. Security Considerations + + The controls defined in this document extend update operations to + support read capabilities. Servers MUST ensure that the client is + authorized for reading of the information provided in this control + and that the client is authorized to perform the requested directory + update. + + Security considerations for the update operations [RFC4511] extended + by this control, as well as general LDAP security considerations + [RFC4510], generally apply to implementation and use of this + extension + + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + +6. IANA Considerations + + Registration of the following protocol values [RFC4520] have been + completed by the IANA. + +6.1. Object Identifier + + The IANA has registered an LDAP Object Identifier to identify LDAP + protocol elements defined in this document. + + Subject: Request for LDAP Object Identifier Registration + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org> + Specification: RFC 4527 + Author/Change Controller: IESG + Comments: Identifies the LDAP Read Entry Controls + +6.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanisms + + The IANA has registered the LDAP Protocol Mechanism described in this + document. + + Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration + Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.1.13.1 + Description: LDAP Pre-read Control + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org> + Usage: Control + Specification: RFC 4527 + Author/Change Controller: IESG + Comments: none + + Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration + Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.1.13.2 + Description: LDAP Post-read Control + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org> + Usage: Control + Specification: RFC 4527 + Author/Change Controller: IESG + Comments: none + +7. Acknowledgement + + The LDAP Pre-Read and Post-Read controls are modeled after similar + capabilities offered in the DAP [X.511]. + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + +8. References + +8.1. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC3296] Zeilenga, K., "Named Subordinate References in + Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) + Directories", RFC 3296, July 2002. + + [RFC3673] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol + version 3 (LDAPv3): All Operational Attributes", RFC + 3673, December 2003. + + [RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., Ed, "Lightweight Directory Access + Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC + 4510, June 2006. + + [RFC4511] Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access + Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006. + + [RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol + (LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June + 2006. + + [RFC4528] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol + (LDAP) Assertion Control", RFC 4528, June 2006. + + [X.680] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract + Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic + Notation", X.680(1997) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:1998). + + [X.690] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, + "Specification of ASN.1 encoding rules: Basic Encoding + Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER), and + Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", X.690(1997) (also + ISO/IEC 8825-1:1998). + + + + + + + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 6] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + +8.2. Informative References + + [RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority + (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory + Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006. + + [RFC4530] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol + (LDAP) EntryUUID Operational Attribute", RFC 4530, June + 2006. + + [X.511] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The + Directory: Abstract Service Definition", X.511(1993) + (also ISO/IEC 9594-3:1993). + +Author's Address + + Kurt D. Zeilenga + OpenLDAP Foundation + + EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 7] + +RFC 4527 LDAP Read Entry Controls June 2006 + + +Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). + + This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions + contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors + retain all their rights. + + This document and the information contained herein are provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS + OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET + ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, + INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE + INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED + WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Intellectual Property + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has + made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information + on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be + found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. + + Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any + assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an + attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of + such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this + specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at + http://www.ietf.org/ipr. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at + ietf-ipr@ietf.org. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF + Administrative Support Activity (IASA). + + + + + + + +Zeilenga Standards Track [Page 8] + |