summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt787
1 files changed, 787 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0bc8dc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4570.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,787 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group B. Quinn
+Request for Comments: 4570 BoxnArrow.com
+Category: Standards Track R. Finlayson
+ Live Networks, Inc.
+ July 2006
+
+
+ Session Description Protocol (SDP) Source Filters
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document describes how to adapt the Session Description Protocol
+ (SDP) to express one or more source addresses as a source filter for
+ one or more destination "connection" addresses. It defines the
+ syntax and semantics for an SDP "source-filter" attribute that may
+ reference either IPv4 or IPv6 address(es) as either an inclusive or
+ exclusive source list for either multicast or unicast destinations.
+ In particular, an inclusive source-filter can be used to specify a
+ Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) session.
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ The Session Description Protocol [SDP] provides a general purpose
+ format for describing multimedia sessions in announcements or
+ invitations. SDP uses an entirely textual data format (the US-ASCII
+ subset of [UTF-8]) to maximize portability among transports. SDP
+ does not define a protocol, but only the syntax to describe a
+ multimedia session with sufficient information to discover and
+ participate in that session. Session descriptions may be sent using
+ any number of existing application protocols for transport (e.g.,
+ Session Announcement Protocol (SAP), SIP, Real Time Streaming
+ Protocol (RTSP), email, and HTTP).
+
+ Typically, session descriptions reference an IP multicast address for
+ the "connection-address" (destination), though unicast addresses or
+ fully qualified domain names (FQDNs) MAY also be used. The "source-
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+ filter" attribute defined in this document qualifies the session
+ traffic by identifying the address (or FQDN) of legitimate sources
+ (senders). The intent is for receivers to use the source and
+ destination address pair(s) to filter traffic, so that applications
+ receive only legitimate session traffic.
+
+ Receiver applications are expected to use the SDP source-filter
+ information to identify traffic from legitimate senders, and discard
+ traffic from illegitimate senders. Applications and hosts may also
+ share the source-filter information with network elements (e.g., with
+ routers using [IGMPv3]) so they can potentially perform the traffic
+ filtering operation further "upstream," closer to the source(s).
+
+ The "source-filter" attribute can appear at the session level and/or
+ the media level.
+
+1.1. Motivation
+
+ The purpose of a source-filter is to help protect receivers from
+ traffic sent from illegitimate source addresses. Filtering traffic
+ can help to preserve content integrity and protect against Denial of
+ Service (DoS) attacks.
+
+ For multicast destination addresses, receiver applications MAY apply
+ source-filters using the Multicast Source Filter APIs [MSF-API].
+ Hosts are likely to implement these APIs using protocol mechanisms to
+ convey the source filters to local multicast routers. Other
+ "upstream" multicast routers MAY apply the filters and thereby
+ provide more explicit multicast group management and efficient
+ utilization of network resources. The protocol mechanisms to enable
+ these operations are beyond the scope of this document, but their
+ potential provided motivation for SDP source-filters.
+
+2. Terminology
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [REQMNT].
+
+3. The "source-filter" Attribute
+
+ The SDP source-filter attribute does not change any existing SDP
+ syntax or semantics, but defines a format for additional session
+ description information. Specifically, source-filter syntax can
+ prescribe one or more unicast addresses as either legitimate or
+ illegitimate sources for any (or all) SDP session description
+ "connection-address" field values.
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+ Note that the unicast source addresses specified by this attribute
+ are those that are seen by a receiver. Therefore, if source
+ addresses undergo translation en route from the original sender to
+ the receiver - e.g., due to Network Address Translation (NAT) or some
+ tunneling mechanism - then the SDP "source-filter" attribute, as
+ presented to the receiver, will not be accurate unless the source
+ addresses therein are also translated accordingly.
+
+ The source-filter attribute has the following syntax:
+
+ a=source-filter: <filter-mode> <filter-spec>
+
+ The <filter-mode> is either "incl" or "excl" (for inclusion or
+ exclusion, respectively). The <filter-spec> has four sub-components:
+
+ <nettype> <address-types> <dest-address> <src-list>
+
+ A <filter-mode> of "incl" means that an incoming packet is accepted
+ only if its source address is in the set specified by <src-list>. A
+ <filter-mode> of "excl" means that an incoming packet is rejected if
+ its source address is in the set specified by <src-list>.
+
+ The first sub-field, <nettype>, indicates the network type, since SDP
+ is protocol independent. This document is most relevant to the value
+ "IN", which designates the Internet Protocol.
+
+ The second sub-field, <address-types>, identifies the address family,
+ and for the purpose of this document may be either <addrtype> value
+ "IP4" or "IP6". Alternately, when <dest-address> is an FQDN, the
+ value MAY be "*" to apply to both address types, since either address
+ type can be returned from a DNS lookup.
+
+ The third sub-field, <dest-address>, is the destination address,
+ which MUST correspond to one or more of the session's "connection-
+ address" field values. It may be either a unicast or multicast
+ address, an FQDN, or the "*" wildcard to match any/all of the
+ session's "connection-address" values.
+
+ The fourth sub-field, <src-list>, is the list of source
+ hosts/interfaces in the source-filter, and consists of one or more
+ unicast addresses or FQDNs, separated by space characters.
+
+ The format and content of these semantic elements are derived from
+ and compatible with those defined in [SDP]. For more detail, see
+ Appendix A of this document.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+3.1. Processing Rules
+
+ There are a number of details to consider when parsing the SDP
+ source-filter syntax.
+
+ The <dest-address> value in a "source-filter" attribute MUST
+ correspond to an existing <connection-field> value in the session
+ description. The only exception to this is when a "*" wildcard is
+ used to indicate that the source-filter applies to all
+ <connection-field> values.
+
+ When the <dest-address> value is a multicast address, the field value
+ MUST NOT include the sub-fields <ttl> and <number of addresses> from
+ the <connection-address> value. If the <connection-address>
+ specifies more than one multicast address (in the <number of
+ addresses> field), then a source filter, if any, for each such
+ address must be stated explicitly, using a separate "a=source-filter"
+ line for each address (unless a "*" wildcard is used for
+ <dest-address>). See section 3.2.4 for an example.
+
+ When the <addrtype> value is the "*" wildcard, the <dest-address>
+ MUST be either an FQDN or "*" (i.e., it MUST NOT be an IPv4 or IPv6
+ address). See section 3.2.6 for an example.
+
+ As has always been the case, the default behavior when a source-
+ filter attribute is not provided in a session description is that all
+ traffic sent to the specified <connection-address> value should be
+ accepted (i.e., from any source address). The source-filter grammar
+ does not include syntax to express either "exclude none" or "include
+ all."
+
+ Like the standard <connection-field> described in [SDP], the location
+ of the "source-filter" attribute determines whether it applies to the
+ entire session or only to a specific medium (i.e., "session-level" or
+ "media-level"). A media-level source-filter will always completely
+ override a session-level source-filter.
+
+ A "source-filter" need not be located at the same hierarchy level as
+ its corresponding <connection-field>. So, a media-level
+ <source-filter> can reference a session-level <connection-field>
+ value, and a session-level "source-filter" can be applied to all
+ matching media-level <connection-field> values. See section 3.2.3
+ for an example.
+
+ An SDP description MUST NOT contain more than one session-level
+ "source-filter" attribute that covers the same destination address,
+ or more than one media-level "source-filter" attribute that covers
+ the same destination address.
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+ There is no specified limit to the number of entries allowed in the
+ <src-list>; however, there are practical limits that should be
+ considered. For example, depending on the transport to be used for
+ the session description, there may be a limit to the total size of
+ the session description (e.g., as determined by the maximum payload
+ in a single datagram). Also, when the source-filter is applied to
+ control protocols, there may be a limit to the number of source
+ addresses that can be sent. These limits are outside the scope of
+ this document, but should be considered when defining source-filter
+ values for SDP.
+
+3.2. Examples
+
+ Here are a number of examples that illustrate how to use the source-
+ filter attribute in some common scenarios. We use the following
+ session description components as the starting point for the examples
+ to follow. For each example, we show the source filter with
+ additional relevant information and provide a brief explanation.
+
+ <session-description> =
+ v=0
+ o=The King <Elvis@example.com>
+ s=Elvis Impersonation
+ i=All Elvis, all the time
+ u=http://www.example.com/ElvisLive/
+ t=0 0
+ a=recvonly
+
+ <media-description 1> =
+ m=audio 54320 RTP/AVP 0
+
+ <media-description 2> =
+ m=video 54322 RTP/AVP 34
+
+3.2.1. Source-Specific Multicast Example
+
+ Multicast addresses in the Source-Specific Multicast [SSM] range
+ require a single unicast sender address for each multicast
+ destination, so the source-filter specification provides a natural
+ fit. In this example, a session member should receive only traffic
+ sent from 192.0.2.10 to the multicast session address 232.3.4.5.
+
+ <session-description>
+
+ c=IN IP4 232.3.4.5/127
+ a=source-filter: incl IN IP4 232.3.4.5 192.0.2.10
+
+ <media-description 1>
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+ This source-filter example uses an inclusion list with a single
+ multicast "connection-address" as the destination and single unicast
+ address as the source. Note that the value of the connection-address
+ matches the value specified in the connection-field.
+
+ Also note that since the connection-field is located in the session-
+ description section, the source-filter applies to all media.
+
+ Furthermore, if the SDP description specifies an RTP session (e.g.,
+ its "m=" line(s) specify "RTP/AVP" as the transport protocol), then
+ the "incl" specification will apply not only to RTP packets, but also
+ to any RTCP packets that are sent to the specified multicast address.
+ This means that, as a side effect of the "incl" specification, the
+ only possible multicast RTCP packets will be "Sender Report" (SR)
+ packets sent from the specified source address.
+
+ Because of this, an SDP description for a Source-Specific Multicast
+ (SSM) RTP session SHOULD also include an
+
+ a=rtcp-unicast ...
+
+ attribute, as described in [RTCP-SSM] (section 10.1). This specifies
+ that RTCP "Reception Report" (RR) packets are to be sent back via
+ unicast.
+
+3.2.2. Unicast Exclusion Example
+
+ Typically, an SDP session <connection-address> value is a multicast
+ address, although it is also possible to use either a unicast address
+ or FQDN. This example illustrates a scenario whereby a session
+ description indicates the unicast source address 192.0.2.10 in an
+ exclusion filter. In effect, this sample source-filter says,
+ "destination 192.0.2.11 should accept traffic from any sender
+ *except* 192.0.2.10."
+
+ <session-description>
+
+ c=IN IP4 192.0.2.11
+ a=source-filter: excl IN IP4 192.0.2.11 192.0.2.10
+
+ <media-description 1>
+
+3.2.3. Multiple Session Address Example
+
+ This source-filter example uses the wildcard "*" value for
+ <dest-addr> to correspond to any/all <connection-address> values.
+ Hence, the only legitimate source for traffic sent to either
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+ 232.2.2.2 or 232.4.4.4 multicast addresses is 192.0.2.10. Traffic
+ sent from any other unicast source address should be discarded by the
+ receiver.
+
+ <session-description>
+
+ a=source-filter: incl IN IP4 * 192.0.2.10
+
+ <media-description 1>
+
+ c=IN IP4 232.2.2.2/127
+
+ <media-description 2>
+
+ c=IN IP4 232.4.4.4/63
+
+3.2.4. Multiple Multicast Address Example
+
+ In this example, the <connection-address> specifies three multicast
+ addresses: 224.2.1.1, 224.2.1.2, and 224.2.1.3. The first and third
+ of these addresses are given source filters. However, in this
+ example the second address - 224.2.1.2 - is *not* given a source
+ filter.
+
+ <session-description>
+
+ c=IN IP4 224.2.1.1/127/3
+ a=source-filter: incl IN IP4 224.2.1.1 192.0.2.10
+ a=source-filter: incl IN IP4 224.2.1.3 192.0.2.42
+
+ <media-description 1>
+
+3.2.5. IPv6 Multicast Source-Filter Example
+
+ This simple example defines a single session-level source-filter that
+ references a single IPv6 multicast destination and source pair. The
+ IP multicast traffic sent to FFOE::11A is valid only from the unicast
+ source address 2001:DB8:1:2:240:96FF:FE25:8EC9.
+
+ <session-description>
+
+ c=IN IP6 FF0E::11A/127
+ a=source-filter incl IN IP6 FF0E::11A 2001:DB8:1:2:240:96FF:FE25:8EC9
+
+ <media-description 1>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+3.2.6. IPv4 and IPv6 FQDN Example
+
+ This example illustrates use of the <addrtype> "*" wildcard, along
+ with multicast and source FQDNs that may resolve to either an IPv6 or
+ IPv4 address, or both. Although typically both the multicast and
+ source addresses will be the same (either both IPv4 or both IPv6),
+ using the wildcard for addrtype in the source filter allows asymmetry
+ between the two addresses (so an IPv4 source address may be used with
+ an IPv6 multicast address).
+
+ <session-description>
+
+ c=IN IP4 channel-1.example.com/127
+ c=IN IP6 channel-1.example.com/127
+ a=source-filter: incl IN * channel-1.example.com src-1.example.com
+
+ <media-description 1>
+
+3.3. Offer-Answer Model Considerations
+
+ The "source-filter" attribute is not intended to be used as an
+ 'offer' in an SDP offer-answer exchange [OFFER], because sets of
+ source addresses do not represent 'capabilities' or 'limitations' of
+ the offerer, and because the offerer does not, in general, have a
+ priori knowledge of which IP source address(es) will be included in
+ an answer. While an answerer may include the "source-filter"
+ attribute in his/her answer (e.g., to designate a SSM session), the
+ answerer SHOULD ignore any "source-filter" attribute that was present
+ in the original offer.
+
+4. Interoperability Issues
+
+ Defining a list of legitimate sources for a multicast destination
+ address represents a departure from the Any-Source Multicast (ASM)
+ model, as originally described in [IGMPv1]. The ASM model supports
+ anonymous senders and all types of multicast applications (e.g.,
+ many-to-many). Use of a source-filter excludes some (unknown or
+ undesirable) senders, which lends itself more to one-to-many or few-
+ to-few type multicast applications.
+
+ Although these two models have contrasting operational
+ characteristics and requirements, they can coexist on the same
+ network using the same protocols. Use of source-filters do not
+ corrupt the ASM semantics but provide more control for receivers, at
+ their discretion.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+5. Security Considerations
+
+ See [SDP] for security considerations specific to the Session
+ Description Protocol in general. The central issue relevant to using
+ source address filters is the question of address authenticity.
+
+ Using the source IP address for authentication is weak, since
+ addresses are often dynamically assigned and it is possible for a
+ sender to "spoof" its source address (i.e., use one other than its
+ own) in datagrams that it sends. Proper router configuration,
+ however, can reduce the likelihood of "spoofed" source addresses
+ being sent to or from a network. Specifically, border routers are
+ encouraged to filter traffic so that datagrams with invalid source
+ addresses are not forwarded (e.g., routers drop datagrams if the
+ source address is non-local) [FILTERING]. This, however, does not
+ prevent IP source addresses from being spoofed on a Local Area
+ Network (LAN).
+
+ Also, as noted in section 3 above, tunneling or NAT mechanisms may
+ require corresponding translation of the addresses specified in the
+ SDP "source-filter" attribute, and furthermore, may cause a set of
+ original source addresses to be translated to a smaller set of source
+ addresses as seen by the receiver.
+
+ Use of FQDNs for either <dest-address> or <src-list> values provides
+ a layer of indirection that provides great flexibility. However, it
+ also exposes the source-filter to any security inadequacies that the
+ DNS system may have. If unsecured, it is conceivable that the DNS
+ server could return illegitimate addresses.
+
+ In addition, if source-filtering is implemented by sharing the
+ source-filter information with network elements, then the security of
+ the protocol(s) that are used for this (e.g., [IGMPv3]) becomes
+ important, to ensure that legitimate traffic (and only legitimate
+ traffic) is received.
+
+ For these reasons, receivers SHOULD NOT treat the SDP "source-filter"
+ attribute as being its sole mechanism for protecting the integrity of
+ received content.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+6. IANA Considerations
+
+ As recommended by [SDP] (Appendix B), the new attribute name
+ "source-filter" has been registered with IANA, as follows:
+
+ The following contact information shall be used for all registrations
+ included here:
+
+ Contact: Ross Finlayson
+ email: finlayson (at) live555.com
+ phone: +1-650-254-1184
+
+ SDP Attribute ("att-field"):
+ Attribute name: source-filter
+ Long form: Source Filter
+ Type of name: att-field
+ Type of attribute: Session level or media level
+ Subject to charset: No
+ Purpose: See this document
+ Reference: This document
+ Values: See this document, and registrations below
+
+7. Acknowledgements
+
+ The authors would like to thank Dave Thaler and Mark Handley, whose
+ input provided much of the substance of this document. Magnus
+ Westerlund also provided valuable feedback during editing.
+
+8. Normative References
+
+ [ABNF] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
+ Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
+
+ [REQMNT] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+ [SDP] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
+ Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.
+
+ [UTF-8] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
+ 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+9. Informative References
+
+ [FILTERING] Ferguson, P. and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering:
+ Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP
+ Source Address Spoofing", BCP 38, RFC 2827, May 2000.
+
+ [IGMPv1] Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD
+ 5, RFC 1112, August 1989.
+
+ [IGMPv3] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
+ Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version
+ 3", RFC 3376, October 2002.
+
+ [MSF-API] Thaler, D., Fenner, B., and B. Quinn, "Socket Interface
+ Extensions for Multicast Source Filters", RFC 3678,
+ January 2004.
+
+ [OFFER] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model
+ with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264, June
+ 2002.
+
+ [RTCP-SSM] Chesterfield, J., E. Schooler, J. Ott, "RTCP Extensions
+ for Single-Source Multicast Sessions with Unicast
+ Feedback", Work in Progress, October 2004.
+
+ [SSM] Bhattacharyya, S., "An Overview of Source-Specific
+ Multicast (SSM)", RFC 3569, July 2003.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+Appendix A. Source-Filter Attribute Syntax
+
+ This appendix provides an Augmented BNF [ABNF] grammar for expressing
+ an exclusion or inclusion list of one or more (IPv4 or IPv6) unicast
+ source addresses. It is intended as an extension to the grammar for
+ the Session Description Protocol, as defined in [SDP]. Specifically,
+ it describes the syntax for the new "source-filter" attribute field,
+ which MAY be either a session-level or media-level attribute.
+
+ The "dest-address" value in each source-filter field MUST match an
+ existing connection-field value, unless the wildcard connection-
+ address value "*" is specified.
+
+ source-filter = "source-filter" ":" SP filter-mode SP filter-spec
+ ; SP is the ASCII 'space' character
+ ; (0x20, defined in [ABNF]).
+
+ filter-mode = "excl" / "incl"
+ ; either exclusion or inclusion mode.
+
+ filter-spec = nettype SP address-types SP dest-address SP src-list
+ ; nettype is as defined in [SDP].
+
+ address-types = "*" / addrtype
+ ; "*" for all address types (both IP4 and IP6),
+ ; but only when <dest-address> and <src-list>
+ ; reference FQDNs.
+ ; addrtype is as defined in [SDP].
+
+ dest-address = "*" / basic-multicast-address / unicast-address
+ ; "*" applies to all connection-address values.
+ ; unicast-address is as defined in [SDP].
+
+ src-list = *(unicast-address SP) unicast-address
+ ; one or more unicast source addresses (in
+ ; standard IPv4 or IPv6 ASCII-notation form)
+ ; or FQDNs.
+ ; unicast-address is as defined in [SDP].
+
+ basic-multicast-address = basic-IP4-multicast / basic-IP6-multicast
+ / FQDN / extn-addr
+ ; i.e., the same as multicast-address
+ ; defined in [SDP], except that the
+ ; /<ttl> and /<number of addresses>
+ ; fields are not included.
+ ; FQDN and extn-addr are as defined
+ ; in [SDP].
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+ basic-IP4-multicast = m1 3( "." decimal-uchar )
+ ; m1 and decimal-uchar are as defined
+ ; in [SDP].
+
+ basic-IP6-multicast = hexpart
+ ; hexpart is as defined in [SDP].
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Bob Quinn
+ BoxnArrow.com
+ 31 Caldwell Road
+ Waltham, MA 02453
+
+ Phone: +1-781-577-1539
+ EMail: rcq@boxnarrow.com
+
+
+ Ross Finlayson
+ Live Networks, Inc.
+ 650 Castro St., suite 120-196
+ Mountain View, CA 94041
+
+ EMail: finlayson@live555.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
+
+RFC 4570 SDP Source Filters July 2006
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
+
+ This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
+ contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
+ retain all their rights.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
+ OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
+ ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
+ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
+ INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
+ WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Intellectual Property
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
+ made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
+ on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
+ found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
+
+ Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
+ assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
+ attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
+ such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
+ specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
+ ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
+ Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Quinn, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
+