diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc458.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc458.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc458.txt | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3ae14e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group B. Bressler +Request for Comments: 458 BBN-NET +NIC: 14378 B. Thomas + BBN-TENEX + 20 February 1973 + + + Mail Retrieval via FTP + + We propose two new FTP commands called ReaDMailFile and ReaDMail. + These commands are intended to be symmetric with respect to the + current MLFL and MAIL commands. They would allow a user to read his + mail at one or more sites without incurring the overhead of logging + in and without having to use several different retrieval methods. + The user might go further and create a program to go around to all + the server sites and retrieve his mail for him. The current FTP + mechanisms provide for password protection, should security be + required. + + This proposal brings into focus, once again, the problems of + different users with the same ID, and to a lesser extent, one user + with multiple IDs. This RFC does not attempt to address these issues + at this time, as much effort is currently being devoted to them. + However, we believe that a satisfactory system for network mail + should include a mechanism to enable each user to have mail for him + sent to a single repository (ideally, the site of his choice). We + further believe that the two commands proposed here would be useful + in such an environment as well as within the current network + environment. + + The format of the commands is + + COMMAND REPLY + success fail + + RDMF 200,250,330 433,450,451,454,455,457,500,507 + secondary replies: + 252 452 + + RDML 152,330 433,450,451,455,500,507 + + The success reply 200 would take the text "NO MAIL NOW". For the + RDMF command the mail itself is transferred over the data connection, + and the FTP replies come over the TELNET connection. + + + + + + + +Bressler, et. al. [Page 1] + +RFC 458 Mail Retrieval via FTP 20 February 1973 + + + For the RDML command both the mail and the FTP replies come over the + TELNET connection. The reply 152 is a new code meaning "mail text + follows" the text that follows may be "NO MAIL NOW". + + + [This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry] + [into the online RFC archives by Helene Morin, Via Genie 12/1999] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Bressler, et. al. [Page 2] + |