summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc458.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc458.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc458.txt115
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3ae14e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc458.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group B. Bressler
+Request for Comments: 458 BBN-NET
+NIC: 14378 B. Thomas
+ BBN-TENEX
+ 20 February 1973
+
+
+ Mail Retrieval via FTP
+
+ We propose two new FTP commands called ReaDMailFile and ReaDMail.
+ These commands are intended to be symmetric with respect to the
+ current MLFL and MAIL commands. They would allow a user to read his
+ mail at one or more sites without incurring the overhead of logging
+ in and without having to use several different retrieval methods.
+ The user might go further and create a program to go around to all
+ the server sites and retrieve his mail for him. The current FTP
+ mechanisms provide for password protection, should security be
+ required.
+
+ This proposal brings into focus, once again, the problems of
+ different users with the same ID, and to a lesser extent, one user
+ with multiple IDs. This RFC does not attempt to address these issues
+ at this time, as much effort is currently being devoted to them.
+ However, we believe that a satisfactory system for network mail
+ should include a mechanism to enable each user to have mail for him
+ sent to a single repository (ideally, the site of his choice). We
+ further believe that the two commands proposed here would be useful
+ in such an environment as well as within the current network
+ environment.
+
+ The format of the commands is
+
+ COMMAND REPLY
+ success fail
+
+ RDMF 200,250,330 433,450,451,454,455,457,500,507
+ secondary replies:
+ 252 452
+
+ RDML 152,330 433,450,451,455,500,507
+
+ The success reply 200 would take the text "NO MAIL NOW". For the
+ RDMF command the mail itself is transferred over the data connection,
+ and the FTP replies come over the TELNET connection.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bressler, et. al. [Page 1]
+
+RFC 458 Mail Retrieval via FTP 20 February 1973
+
+
+ For the RDML command both the mail and the FTP replies come over the
+ TELNET connection. The reply 152 is a new code meaning "mail text
+ follows" the text that follows may be "NO MAIL NOW".
+
+
+ [This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry]
+ [into the online RFC archives by Helene Morin, Via Genie 12/1999]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bressler, et. al. [Page 2]
+