diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4624.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4624.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc4624.txt | 1795 |
1 files changed, 1795 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4624.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4624.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9868787 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4624.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1795 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group B. Fenner +Request for Comments: 4624 AT&T Research +Category: Experimental D. Thaler + Microsoft + October 2006 + + + Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) MIB + +Status of This Memo + + This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet + community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. + Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. + Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). + +Abstract + + This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management + Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in + the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects + used for managing Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) (RFC + 3618) speakers. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................2 + 2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2 + 3. Overview ........................................................2 + 4. Definitions .....................................................3 + 5. Security Considerations ........................................28 + 6. IANA Considerations ............................................29 + 7. Acknowledgements ...............................................30 + 8. References .....................................................30 + 8.1. Normative References ......................................30 + 8.2. Informative References ....................................30 + + + + + + + + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 1] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +1. Introduction + + This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management + Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in + the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects + used for managing Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) [1] + speakers. + +2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework + + For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current + Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of + RFC 3410 [7]. + + Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed + the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally + accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). + Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the + Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB + module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, + RFC 2578 [4], STD 58, RFC 2579 [5] and STD 58, RFC 2580 [6]. + +3. Overview + + This MIB module contains four scalars and four tables, one + deprecated. The tables are: + + o The deprecated Requests Table, containing the longest-match table + used to determine the peer to send SA-Requests to for a given + group. This table is deprecated because Requests were removed + from MSDP before it became an RFC. + + o The Peer Table, containing information on the system's peers. + + o The Source-Active (SA) Cache Table, containing the SA cache + entries. + + o The Mesh Group Table, containing the list of MSDP mesh groups to + which this system belongs. + + This MIB module uses the IpAddress SYNTAX, making it only suitable + for IPv4 systems. Although the desired direction for MIBs is to use + InetAddressType/InetAddress pairs to allow both IPv4 and IPv6 (and + future formats as well), the MSDP protocol itself is IPv4-only, and + the MSDP working group made an explicit decision not to create an + IPv6 version of the protocol. + + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 2] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + This MIB module is somewhat disorganized, with scalars before and + after tables, holes in the OID space, tables with the RowStatus in + the middle, and so on. This is because objects were added and + removed as necessary as the MSDP protocol evolved, and the plan was + to renumber the whole MIB when moving to the standard mib-2 tree. + The MSDP Working Group then changed direction, publishing the MSDP + protocol as Experimental. Since there were existing implementations + using the strange object order under the experimental OID, the WG + decided not to renumber the MIB and to publish it as experimental, + keeping the experimental OID. + +4. Definitions + +-- +-- +MSDP-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN + +IMPORTS + MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, + experimental, Counter32, Gauge32, TimeTicks, Integer32, + IpAddress + FROM SNMPv2-SMI + RowStatus, TruthValue, TimeStamp, DisplayString + FROM SNMPv2-TC + MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP + FROM SNMPv2-CONF; + +msdpMIB MODULE-IDENTITY + LAST-UPDATED "200608010000Z" + ORGANIZATION "IETF MBONED Working Group" + CONTACT-INFO + "Bill Fenner + 75 Willow Road + Menlo Park, CA 94025 + Phone: +1 650 867 6073 + E-mail: fenner@research.att.com + + Dave Thaler + One Microsoft Way + Redmond, WA 98052 + Phone: +1 425 703 8835 + Email: dthaler@microsoft.com + + MBONED Working Group: mboned@lists.uoregon.edu" + DESCRIPTION + "An experimental MIB module for MSDP Management and + Monitoring. + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 3] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2006. This version of + this MIB module is part of RFC 4624; see the RFC itself + for full legal notices." + REVISION "200608010000Z" + DESCRIPTION + "Initial version, published as RFC 4624." + ::= { experimental 92 } + +msdpMIBobjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { msdpMIB 1 } + +msdp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { msdpMIBobjects 1 } + + +msdpEnabled OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TruthValue + MAX-ACCESS read-write + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The state of MSDP on this MSDP speaker - globally enabled + or disabled. + + Changes to this object should be stored to non-volatile + memory." + ::= { msdp 1 } + +msdpCacheLifetime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeTicks + MAX-ACCESS read-write + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The lifetime given to SA cache entries when created or + refreshed. This is the [SG-State-Period] in the MSDP + spec. A value of 0 means no SA caching is done by this + MSDP speaker. + + Changes to this object should be stored to non-volatile + memory. + + This object does not measure time per se; instead, it + is the delta from the time at which an SA message is + received at which it should be expired if not refreshed. + (i.e., it is the value of msdpSACacheExpiryTime + immediately after receiving an SA message applying to + that row.) As such, TimeInterval would be a more + appropriate SYNTAX; it remains TimeTicks for backwards + compatibility." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 5.3" + ::= { msdp 2 } + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 4] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +msdpNumSACacheEntries OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of entries in the SA Cache table." + ::= { msdp 3 } + +-- +-- The spec doesn't define SA-Hold-Down-Period any more. +-- msdpSAHoldDownPeriod OBJECT-TYPE +-- ::= { msdp 9 } + +-- This object was introduced in error, with a similar definition +-- to msdpCacheLifetime. +-- msdpSAStatePeriod OBJECT-TYPE +-- ::= { msdp 10 } + +msdpRPAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS read-write + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The Rendezvous Point (RP) address used when sourcing + MSDP SA messages. May be 0.0.0.0 on non-RPs. + + Changes to this object should be stored to non-volatile + memory." + ::= { msdp 11 } + +-- +-- The MSDP Requests table +-- SA Requests were removed from the MSDP spec, so this entire table +-- is deprecated. + +msdpRequestsTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MsdpRequestsEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The (conceptual) table listing group ranges and MSDP peers + used when deciding where to send an SA Request message, when + required. If SA Requests are not enabled, this table may be + empty. + + In order to choose a peer to whom to send an SA Request for + a given group, G, the subset of entries in this table whose + (msdpRequestsPeerType, msdpRequestsPeer) tuple represents a + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 5] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + peer whose msdpPeerState is established are examined. The + set is further reduced by examining only those entries for + which msdpPeerRequestsGroupAddressType equals the address + type of G. The entries with the highest value of + msdpRequestsGroupPrefix are considered, where the group G + falls within the range described by the combination of + msdpRequestsGroup and msdpRequestsGroupPrefix. (This + sequence is commonly known as a 'longest-match' lookup.) + + Finally, if multiple entries remain, the entry with the + lowest value of msdpRequestsPriority is chosen. The SA + Request message is sent to the peer described by this row." + ::= { msdp 4 } + +msdpRequestsEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX MsdpRequestsEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "An entry (conceptual row) representing a group range + used when deciding where to send an SA Request + message." + INDEX { msdpRequestsGroupAddress, msdpRequestsGroupMask } + ::= { msdpRequestsTable 1 } + +MsdpRequestsEntry ::= SEQUENCE { + msdpRequestsGroupAddress IpAddress, + msdpRequestsGroupMask IpAddress, + msdpRequestsPeer IpAddress, + msdpRequestsStatus RowStatus + } + +msdpRequestsGroupAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The group address that, when combined with the mask + in this entry, represents the group range to which + this row applies." + ::= { msdpRequestsEntry 1 } + +msdpRequestsGroupMask OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The mask that, when combined with the group address + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 6] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + in this entry, represents the group range to which + this row applies." + ::= { msdpRequestsEntry 2 } + +msdpRequestsPeer OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The peer to which MSDP SA Requests for groups matching + this entry's group range will be sent. This object, + combined with msdpRequestsPeerType, must match the INDEX + of a row in the msdpPeerTable, and to be considered, + this peer's msdpPeerState must be established." + ::= { msdpRequestsEntry 3 } + +msdpRequestsStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX RowStatus + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The status of this row, by which new rows may be added + to the table or old rows may be deleted." + ::= { msdpRequestsEntry 4 } + + +-- +-- The MSDP Peer table +-- + +msdpPeerTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MsdpPeerEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The (conceptual) table listing the MSDP speaker's peers." + ::= { msdp 5 } + +msdpPeerEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX MsdpPeerEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry (conceptual row) representing an MSDP peer. + + If row creation is supported, dynamically added rows are + added to the system's stable configuration (corresponding + to a StorageType value of nonVolatile). " + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 7] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + INDEX { msdpPeerRemoteAddress } + ::= { msdpPeerTable 1 } + +MsdpPeerEntry ::= SEQUENCE { + msdpPeerRemoteAddress IpAddress, + msdpPeerState INTEGER, + msdpPeerRPFFailures Counter32, + msdpPeerInSAs Counter32, + msdpPeerOutSAs Counter32, + msdpPeerInSARequests Counter32, + msdpPeerOutSARequests Counter32, + msdpPeerInSAResponses Counter32, + msdpPeerOutSAResponses Counter32, + msdpPeerInControlMessages Counter32, + msdpPeerOutControlMessages Counter32, + msdpPeerInDataPackets Counter32, + msdpPeerOutDataPackets Counter32, + msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTransitions Counter32, + msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTime TimeStamp, + msdpPeerInMessageTime TimeStamp, + msdpPeerLocalAddress IpAddress, + msdpPeerConnectRetryInterval Integer32, + msdpPeerHoldTimeConfigured Integer32, + msdpPeerKeepAliveConfigured Integer32, + msdpPeerDataTtl Integer32, + msdpPeerProcessRequestsFrom TruthValue, + msdpPeerStatus RowStatus, + msdpPeerRemotePort Integer32, + msdpPeerLocalPort Integer32, + msdpPeerEncapsulationType INTEGER, + msdpPeerConnectionAttempts Counter32, + msdpPeerInNotifications Counter32, + msdpPeerOutNotifications Counter32, + msdpPeerLastError OCTET STRING, + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime TimeStamp + } + +msdpPeerRemoteAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The address of the remote MSDP peer." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 1 } + +-- dunno what happened to 2. + +msdpPeerState OBJECT-TYPE + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 8] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + SYNTAX INTEGER { + inactive(1), + listen(2), + connecting(3), + established(4), + disabled(5) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The state of the MSDP TCP connection with this peer." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 3 } + +msdpPeerRPFFailures OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of SA messages received from this peer that + failed the Peer-RPF check. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 4 } + +msdpPeerInSAs OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA messages received on this + connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 5 } + +msdpPeerOutSAs OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA messages transmitted on this + connection. + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 9] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 6 } + +msdpPeerInSARequests OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA-Request messages received on this + connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 7 } + +msdpPeerOutSARequests OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA-Request messages transmitted on + this connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 8 } + +msdpPeerInSAResponses OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA-Response messages received on this + connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 9 } + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 10] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +msdpPeerOutSAResponses OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA Response messages transmitted on + this TCP connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 10 } + +msdpPeerInControlMessages OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of MSDP messages, excluding encapsulated + data packets, received on this TCP connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 11 } + +msdpPeerOutControlMessages OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of MSDP messages, excluding encapsulated + data packets, transmitted on this TCP connection. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 12 } + +msdpPeerInDataPackets OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of encapsulated data packets received + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 11] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + from this peer. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 13 } + +msdpPeerOutDataPackets OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of encapsulated data packets sent to + this peer. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur at + re-initialization of the management system, and at other + times as indicated by the value of + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 14 } + +msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTransitions OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of times the MSDP FSM transitioned into + the ESTABLISHED state." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 11" + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 15 } + +msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeStamp + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This timestamp is set to the value of sysUpTime when a + peer transitions into or out of the ESTABLISHED state. + It is set to zero when the MSDP speaker is booted." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 11" + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 16 } + +msdpPeerInMessageTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeStamp + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 12] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + "The sysUpTime value when the last MSDP message was + received from the peer. It is set to zero when the MSDP + speaker is booted." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 17 } + +msdpPeerLocalAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The local IP address used for this entry's MSDP TCP + connection." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 18 } + +-- msdpPeerSAAdvPeriod ([SA-Advertisement-Timer]) has been removed. +-- ::= { msdpPeerEntry 19 } +-- RFC 3618, Section 5.1, says it MUST be 60 seconds. + + +msdpPeerConnectRetryInterval OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..65535) + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Time interval, in seconds, for the [ConnectRetry-period] + for this peer." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 5.6" + DEFVAL { 30 } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 20 } + +msdpPeerHoldTimeConfigured OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0|3..65535) + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Time interval, in seconds, for the [HoldTime-Period] + configured for this MSDP speaker with this peer. If the + value of this object is zero (0), the MSDP connection is + never torn down due to the absence of messages from the + peer." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 5.4" + DEFVAL { 75 } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 21 } + +msdpPeerKeepAliveConfigured OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0|1..21845) + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 13] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Time interval, in seconds, for the [KeepAlive-Period] + configured for this MSDP speaker with this peer. If the + value of this object is zero (0), no periodic KEEPALIVE + messages are sent to the peer after the MSDP connection + has been established." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 5.5" + DEFVAL { 60 } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 22 } + +msdpPeerDataTtl OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..255) + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The minimum TTL a packet is required to have before it + may be forwarded using SA encapsulation to this peer." + DEFVAL { 1 } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 23 } + +msdpPeerProcessRequestsFrom OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TruthValue + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "This object indicates whether to process MSDP SA + Request messages from this peer. If True(1), MSDP SA + Request messages from this peer are processed and replied + to (if appropriate) with SA Response messages. If + False(2), MSDP SA Request messages from this peer are + silently ignored. It defaults to False when + msdpCacheLifetime is 0 and to True when msdpCacheLifetime + is non-0. + + This object is deprecated because MSDP SA Requests were + removed from the MSDP specification." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 24 } + +msdpPeerStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX RowStatus + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The RowStatus object by which peers can be added and + deleted. A transition to 'active' will cause the MSDP + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 14] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + 'Enable MSDP peering with P' Event to be generated. A + transition out of the 'active' state will cause the MSDP + 'Disable MSDP peering with P' Event to be generated. + Care should be used in providing write access to this + object without adequate authentication. + + msdpPeerRemoteAddress is the only variable that must be + set to a valid value before the row can be activated. + Since this is the table's INDEX, a row can be activated + by simply setting the msdpPeerStatus variable. + + It is possible to modify other columns in the same + conceptual row when the status value is active(1)." + REFERENCE "RFC 3618 section 11.1" + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 25 } + +msdpPeerRemotePort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535) + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The remote port for the TCP connection between the MSDP + peers." + DEFVAL { 639 } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 26 } + +msdpPeerLocalPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535) + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The local port for the TCP connection between the MSDP + peers." + DEFVAL { 639 } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 27 } + +-- msdpPeerEncapsulationState has been removed +-- because there is no longer an encapsulation +-- state machine. +-- ::= { msdpPeerEntry 28 } + +msdpPeerEncapsulationType OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + none(0), + tcp(1) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 15] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + DESCRIPTION + "The encapsulation in use when encapsulating data in SA + messages to this peer." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 29 } + +msdpPeerConnectionAttempts OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of times the state machine has transitioned + from INACTIVE to CONNECTING." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 30 } + +msdpPeerInNotifications OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP Notification messages received from + this peer. + This object is deprecated because MSDP Notifications have + been removed from the spec." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 31 } + +msdpPeerOutNotifications OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP Notification messages transmitted to + this peer. + + This object is deprecated because MSDP Notifications have + been removed from the spec." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 32 } + +msdpPeerLastError OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (2)) + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The last error code and subcode received via Notification + from this peer. If no error has occurred, this field is + zero. Otherwise, the first byte of this two-byte OCTET + STRING contains the O-bit and error code, and the second + byte contains the subcode. + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 16] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + This object is deprecated because MSDP Notifications have + been removed from the spec." + DEFVAL { '0000'h } + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 33 } + +msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeStamp + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The value of sysUpTime on the most recent occasion at + which one or more of this entry's counters suffered a + discontinuity. See the DESCRIPTION of each object to see + if it is expected to have discontinuities. These + discontinuities may occur at peer connection + establishment. + + If no such discontinuities have occurred since the last + reinitialization of the local management subsystem, then + this object contains a zero value." + ::= { msdpPeerEntry 34 } + +-- +-- The MSDP Source-Active Cache table +-- + +msdpSACacheTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MsdpSACacheEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The (conceptual) table listing the MSDP SA advertisements + currently in the MSDP speaker's cache." + ::= { msdp 6 } + +msdpSACacheEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX MsdpSACacheEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry (conceptual row) representing an MSDP SA + advertisement. The INDEX to this table includes + msdpSACacheOriginRP for diagnosing incorrect MSDP + advertisements; normally, a Group and Source pair would + be unique. + + Row creation is not permitted; msdpSACacheStatus may only + be used to delete rows from this table." + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 17] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + INDEX { msdpSACacheGroupAddr, msdpSACacheSourceAddr, + msdpSACacheOriginRP } + ::= { msdpSACacheTable 1 } + +MsdpSACacheEntry ::= SEQUENCE { + msdpSACacheGroupAddr IpAddress, + msdpSACacheSourceAddr IpAddress, + msdpSACacheOriginRP IpAddress, + msdpSACachePeerLearnedFrom IpAddress, + msdpSACacheRPFPeer IpAddress, + msdpSACacheInSAs Counter32, + msdpSACacheInDataPackets Counter32, + msdpSACacheUpTime TimeTicks, + msdpSACacheExpiryTime TimeTicks, + msdpSACacheStatus RowStatus + } + +msdpSACacheGroupAddr OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The group address of the SA Cache entry." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 1 } + +msdpSACacheSourceAddr OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The source address of the SA Cache entry." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 2 } + +msdpSACacheOriginRP OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The RP of the SA Cache entry. This field is in the INDEX + in order to catch multiple RP's advertising the same + source and group." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 3 } + +msdpSACachePeerLearnedFrom OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 18] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + "The peer from which this SA Cache entry was last + accepted. This address must correspond to the + msdpPeerRemoteAddress value for a row in the MSDP Peer + Table. This should be 0.0.0.0 on the router that + originated the entry." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 4 } + +msdpSACacheRPFPeer OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The peer from which an SA message corresponding to this + cache entry would be accepted (i.e., the RPF peer for + msdpSACacheOriginRP). This may be different than + msdpSACachePeerLearnedFrom if this entry was created by + an MSDP SA-Response. This address must correspond to + the msdpPeerRemoteAddress value for a row in the MSDP + Peer Table, or it may be 0.0.0.0 if no RPF peer exists." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 5 } + +msdpSACacheInSAs OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP SA messages received relevant to this + cache entry. This object must be initialized to zero + when creating a cache entry." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 6 } + +msdpSACacheInDataPackets OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of MSDP-encapsulated data packets received + relevant to this cache entry. This object must be + initialized to zero when creating a cache entry." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 7 } + +msdpSACacheUpTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeTicks + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The time since this entry was first placed in the SA + cache. + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 19] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + The first epoch is the time that the entry was first + placed in the SA cache, and the second epoch is the + current time." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 8 } + +msdpSACacheExpiryTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeTicks + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The time remaining before this entry will expire from + the SA cache. + + The first epoch is now, and the second epoch is the time + that the entry will expire." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 9 } + +msdpSACacheStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), destroy(6) } + MAX-ACCESS read-write + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The status of this row in the table. The only allowable + actions are to retrieve the status, which will be + 'active', or to set the status to 'destroy' in order to + remove this entry from the cache. + + Row creation is not permitted. + + No columnar objects are writable, so there are none that + may be changed while the status value is active(1)." + ::= { msdpSACacheEntry 10 } + + +-- +-- MSDP Mesh Group Membership table +-- + +msdpMeshGroupTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MsdpMeshGroupEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The (conceptual) table listing MSDP Mesh Group + configuration." + ::= { msdp 12 } + +msdpMeshGroupEntry OBJECT-TYPE + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 20] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + SYNTAX MsdpMeshGroupEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry (conceptual row) representing a peer in an MSDP + Mesh Group. + + If row creation is supported, dynamically added rows are + added to the system's stable configuration + (corresponding to a StorageType value of nonVolatile)." + INDEX { msdpMeshGroupName, msdpMeshGroupPeerAddress } + ::= { msdpMeshGroupTable 1 } + +MsdpMeshGroupEntry ::= SEQUENCE { + msdpMeshGroupName DisplayString, + msdpMeshGroupPeerAddress IpAddress, + msdpMeshGroupStatus RowStatus + } + +msdpMeshGroupName OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX DisplayString (SIZE(1..64)) + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The name of the mesh group." + ::= { msdpMeshGroupEntry 1 } + +msdpMeshGroupPeerAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX IpAddress + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A peer address that is a member of the mesh group with + name msdpMeshGroupName. The msdpMeshGroupPeerAddress + must match a row in the msdpPeerTable." + ::= { msdpMeshGroupEntry 2 } + +msdpMeshGroupStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX RowStatus + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This entry's status, by which new entries may be added + to the table and old entries deleted. + + msdpMeshGroupName and msdpMeshGroupPeerAddress must be + set to valid values before the row can be activated. + Since these are the table's INDEX, a row can be activated + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 21] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + by simply setting the msdpMeshGroupStatus variable. + + It is not possible to modify other columns in the same + conceptual row when the status value is active(1), + because the only other objects in the row are part of the + INDEX. Changing one of these changes the row, so an old + row must be deleted and a new one created." + ::= { msdpMeshGroupEntry 3 } + + +-- Traps + +msdpTraps OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { msdp 0 } + +msdpEstablished NOTIFICATION-TYPE + OBJECTS { msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTransitions } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The MSDP Established event is generated when the MSDP FSM + enters the ESTABLISHED state." + ::= { msdpTraps 1 } + +msdpBackwardTransition NOTIFICATION-TYPE + OBJECTS { msdpPeerState } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The MSDPBackwardTransition Event is generated when the + MSDP FSM moves from a higher-numbered state to a + lower-numbered state." + ::= { msdpTraps 2 } + +-- conformance information + +msdpMIBConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { msdp 8 } +msdpMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { msdpMIBConformance 1 } +msdpMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { msdpMIBConformance 2 } + +-- compliance statements + +msdpMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "The compliance statement for entities that implement a pre- + RFC version of MSDP. This statement is deprecated because + it includes objects used for managing/monitoring aspects of + MSDP that were removed before it was published as an RFC." + MODULE -- this module + MANDATORY-GROUPS { msdpMIBGlobalsGroup, msdpMIBPeerGroup, + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 22] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + msdpMIBNotificationGroup } + + GROUP msdpMIBEncapsulationGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if MSDP encapsulation interfaces are + not given their own interface index numbers." + GROUP msdpMIBSACacheGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker has the ability + to cache SA messages." + GROUP msdpMIBRequestsGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker has the ability + to send SA-Request messages and to parse SA-Response + messages." + GROUP msdpMIBRPGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker sources (as + opposed to forwards) MSDP messages." + GROUP msdpMIBMeshGroupGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker can participate + in MSDP Mesh Groups." + ::= { msdpMIBCompliances 1 } + +msdpMIBFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The compliance statement for entities that implement MSDP + (RFC3618)." + MODULE -- this module + MANDATORY-GROUPS { msdpMIBGlobalsGroup, msdpMIBPeerGroup2, + msdpMIBSACacheGroup, msdpMIBEncapsulationGroup } + GROUP msdpMIBRPGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker sources (as + opposed to forwards) MSDP messages." + GROUP msdpMIBMeshGroupGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker can participate + in MSDP Mesh Groups." + ::= { msdpMIBCompliances 2 } + +msdpMIBReadOnlyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The compliance statement for entities that implement MSDP + (RFC3618), but do not permit configuration (or only permit + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 23] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + partial configuration) via SNMP." + MODULE -- this module + MANDATORY-GROUPS { msdpMIBGlobalsGroup, msdpMIBPeerGroup2, + msdpMIBSACacheGroup, msdpMIBEncapsulationGroup } + GROUP msdpMIBRPGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker sources (as + opposed to forwards) MSDP messages." + GROUP msdpMIBMeshGroupGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory if the MSDP speaker can participate + in MSDP Mesh Groups." + OBJECT msdpEnabled + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpCacheLifetime + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerLocalAddress + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerConnectRetryInterval + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerHoldTimeConfigured + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerKeepAliveConfigured + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerDataTtl + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerStatus + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpPeerEncapsulationType + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 24] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + OBJECT msdpSACacheStatus + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpRPAddress + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + OBJECT msdpMeshGroupStatus + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required." + ::= { msdpMIBCompliances 3 } + +-- units of conformance + +msdpMIBGlobalsGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpEnabled } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects providing information on global MSDP + state." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 1 } + +msdpMIBPeerGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpPeerRPFFailures, + msdpPeerState, msdpPeerInSAs, msdpPeerOutSAs, + msdpPeerInSARequests, msdpPeerOutSARequests, + msdpPeerInSAResponses, msdpPeerOutSAResponses, + msdpPeerInNotifications, msdpPeerOutNotifications, + msdpPeerInControlMessages, msdpPeerOutControlMessages, + msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTransitions, + msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTime, + msdpPeerLocalAddress, + msdpPeerRemotePort, msdpPeerLocalPort, + msdpPeerConnectRetryInterval, + msdpPeerHoldTimeConfigured, + msdpPeerKeepAliveConfigured, + msdpPeerInMessageTime, + msdpPeerProcessRequestsFrom, + msdpPeerConnectionAttempts, + msdpPeerLastError, + msdpPeerStatus, + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime + } + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for managing MSDP peers. This group + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 25] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + is deprecated in favor of msdpMIBPeerGroup2 because it + contains objects for managing aspects of MSDP that were + removed before it was published as an RFC." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 2 } + +msdpMIBEncapsulationGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpPeerInDataPackets, msdpPeerOutDataPackets, + msdpPeerDataTtl, + msdpPeerEncapsulationType + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for managing encapsulations if the + MSDP encapsulation interfaces are not given interface + indices." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 3 } + +msdpMIBSACacheGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpCacheLifetime, msdpNumSACacheEntries, + msdpSACachePeerLearnedFrom, + msdpSACacheRPFPeer, msdpSACacheInSAs, + msdpSACacheInDataPackets, + msdpSACacheUpTime, msdpSACacheExpiryTime, + msdpSACacheStatus } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for managing MSDP SA cache entries." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 4 } + +msdpMIBNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP + NOTIFICATIONS { msdpEstablished, + msdpBackwardTransition } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of notifications for signaling changes in MSDP + peer relationships." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 5 } + +msdpMIBRequestsGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpRequestsPeer, msdpRequestsStatus } + STATUS deprecated + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for managing MSDP Request + transmission. This group is deprecated because Requests + were removed from MSDP before its publication as an RFC." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 6 } + +msdpMIBRPGroup OBJECT-GROUP + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 26] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + OBJECTS { msdpRPAddress } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for MSDP speakers that source MSDP + messages." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 7 } + +msdpMIBMeshGroupGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpMeshGroupStatus } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for MSDP speakers that can + participate in MSDP mesh groups." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 8 } + +msdpMIBPeerGroup2 OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { msdpPeerRPFFailures, + msdpPeerState, msdpPeerInSAs, msdpPeerOutSAs, + msdpPeerInSARequests, msdpPeerOutSARequests, + msdpPeerInControlMessages, msdpPeerOutControlMessages, + msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTransitions, + msdpPeerFsmEstablishedTime, + msdpPeerLocalAddress, + msdpPeerRemotePort, msdpPeerLocalPort, + msdpPeerConnectRetryInterval, + msdpPeerHoldTimeConfigured, + msdpPeerKeepAliveConfigured, + msdpPeerInMessageTime, + msdpPeerConnectionAttempts, + msdpPeerStatus, + msdpPeerDiscontinuityTime + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of objects for managing MSDP peers." + ::= { msdpMIBGroups 9 } + +END + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 27] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +5. Security Considerations + + There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB module + with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such + objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network + environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure + environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on + network operations. These are the tables and objects and their + sensitivity/vulnerability: + + msdpEnabled + Obviously, by modifying msdpEnabled, an attacker could simply + disable MSDP processing on the router. + + msdpCacheLifetime + If allowed to modify msdpCacheLifetime, an attacker could set the + value to a value lower than a peer's refresh interval, causing all + state to time out and be refreshed. + + msdpRequestsPeer, msdpRequestsStatus + If allowed to modify entries in the msdpRequestsTable, an attacker + could cause this system to send MSDP Requests to an unknown + system, or could simply remove the proper configuration. Note + that the msdpRequestsTable is deprecated, and the MSDP Request + functionality is not in the published MSDP spec. + + msdpPeerTable objects + The writable objects in the msdpPeerTable are: + msdpPeerLocalAddress, msdpPeerConnectRetryInterval, + msdpPeerHoldTimeConfigured, msdpPeerKeepAliveConfigured, + msdpPeerDataTtl, msdpPeerProcessRequestsFrom, msdpPeerStatus, and + msdpPeerEncapsulationType. Of these, modifying msdpPeerIpAddress + and msdpPeerStatus could cause a changed or deleted peer + configuration. Modifying any of the other values could cause + subtle protocol misbehavior. + + msdpSACacheStatus + This writable object can be used to remove valid values from the + router's SA cache. + + msdpRPAddress + Changing this object can cause a failure of the Peer-RPF rules for + SA messages sourced by this router. + + msdpMeshGroupStatus + This object can be used to change this router's idea of its mesh + group membership and those of its peers. Misconfiguration of mesh + groups can cause subtle protocol misbehavior. + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 28] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + + Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects with a + MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or + vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to + control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly + to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over + the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their + sensitivity/vulnerability: + + o The entire msdpPeerTable. Peer information can result in + discovering internal topology, which many want to keep secret. + + o msdpNumSACacheEntries. The size of the SA Cache could reveal + whether this system has MSDP entries for public and/or private + groups. + + o The entire msdpSACacheTable. The active sources and groups in a + network could be private. + + o The entire msdpMeshGroupTable. This information can also lead to + internal topology information. + + SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. + Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), + even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is + allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects + in this MIB module. + + It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as + provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [6], Section 8), including full + support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication + and privacy). + + Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT + RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to + enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator + responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an + instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to + the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate + rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them. + +6. IANA Considerations + + Since this MIB is for an experimental protocol, it uses an + experimental OID. + + Decimal Name Description References + ------- ---- ----------- ---------- + 92 MSDP-MIB Multicast Source Discovery MIB RFC 4624 + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 29] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +7. Acknowledgements + + Tom Pusateri and Billy Ng both provided valuable input on early + versions of this document. It was completed with feedback from Mike + Davison and Ketan Talaulikar. Lucy Lynch provided a desperately + needed reminder to finish this document. + +8. References + +8.1 Normative References + + [1] Fenner, B., Ed., and D. Meyer, Ed., "Multicast Source Discovery + Protocol (MSDP)", RFC 3618, October 2003. + + [2] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM) + for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol + (SNMPv3)", STD 62, RFC 3414, December 2002. + + [3] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access + Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol + (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3415, December 2002. + + [4] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Structure of + Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, + April 1999. + + [5] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual + Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999. + + [6] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Conformance + Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999. + +8.2. Informative References + + [7] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction + and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management + Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 30] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +Authors' Addresses + + Bill Fenner + 1 River Oaks Place + San Jose, CA 95134-1918 + + Phone: +1 (408 493-8505 + EMail: fenner@research.att.com + + + Dave Thaler + Microsoft Corporation + One Microsoft Way + Redmond, WA 98052-6399 + + Phone: +1 425 703 8835 + EMail: dthaler@microsoft.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 31] + +RFC 4624 MSDP MIB October 2006 + + +Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). + + This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions + contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors + retain all their rights. + + This document and the information contained herein are provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS + OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET + ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, + INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE + INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED + WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Intellectual Property + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has + made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information + on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be + found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. + + Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any + assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an + attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of + such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this + specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at + http://www.ietf.org/ipr. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at + ietf-ipr@ietf.org. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF + Administrative Support Activity (IASA). + + + + + + + +Fenner & Thaler Experimental [Page 32] + |