summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc519.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc519.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc519.txt227
1 files changed, 227 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73d9759
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. Pickens
+Request for Comments: 519 Computer Systems Laboratory -- UCSB
+NIC: 16818 June 1973
+
+
+ Resource Evaluation
+
+Abstract
+
+ In the spirit of RFC # 369, Evaluation of ARPANET resources, a new
+ test group was organized at UCSB to take a detailed look at specific
+ network resources and develop initial site dependent and function
+ dependent MINIMAN's (Concise User Manuals). As the group was again
+ composed of novices, initial effort revolved about basic procedural
+ indoctrination. In the period between January and March 1973 a
+ number of resources were investigated with varying degrees of
+ success, as to availability, proper usage, sample problem solutions,
+ and access to help and documentation. Included in this paper are a
+ summary of the projects undertaken, initial suggestions at MINIMAN
+ composition, and suggestions for future test groups. As these groups
+ are attempting to perform a useful function for the ARPANET
+ community, comments and suggestions are requested. Copies of the
+ reports described herein are available on request from the Computer
+ Systems Laboratory at UCSB.
+
+Resources Investigated by the Group
+
+ I. APL
+
+ APL was investigated primarily at MULTICS. UCSD was also
+ scheduled for evaluation but not carried out. APL at MULTICS was
+ used to solve a few trivial problems. Most effort revolved about
+ the difficult task of obtaining any available documentation. The
+ octal codes for APL characters were obtained and mapped into the
+ OLS keyboard. A side goal of the project, the comparison of APL
+ with OLS, was begun but progressed very little.
+
+ II. Basic
+
+ Basic was investigated at a number of TENEX sites. Differences
+ between sites were pointed out and necessary file manipulation
+ commands were documented. An integration problem was written at
+ one site, sent via FTP to another site, and then run again to show
+ comparative execution times and compatability. Non-PDP/10 sites
+ were investigated but no report was submitted.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pickens [Page 1]
+
+RFC 519 Resource Evaluation June 1973
+
+
+ III. TSO
+
+ IBM's Time Sharing option was exercised at UCLA-CCN. Interesting
+ results were obtained regarding cost and execution time.
+ Available commands were documented and a PL/1 program was written
+ and executed.
+
+ IV. MIT-MATHLAB
+
+ This, the most successful of the projects, involved documentation
+ of help, file manipulation, and MACSYMA access and an original
+ research project in resource sharing. A recursive problem in
+ pattern recognition and a triple integration were solved to
+ demonstrate MACSYMA generated expressions into user programs on
+ the OLS. More information on this project is forthcoming.
+
+ V. Local User Guide
+
+ A first pass network users manual was completed for UCSB users.
+ In it are described console access and settings, character
+ mappings, current servers, users and TIPs, and error conditions.
+ Following minor revisions this guide will be distributed to local
+ users.
+
+ VI. Local IMLAC Access to Network
+
+ Access to network graphics programs was attempted with a local
+ IMLAC. Due to the non-uniformity of network IMLACs very little
+ success was obtained. However, a program to access SRI-ARC's NLS
+ was compiled and loaded from NIC and attempts were made to iron
+ out the bugs. In addition a project was begun to maintain an
+ IMLAC library and compiler locally for network usage. As in the
+ other projects, basic operating procedures were documented.
+
+ VII. Harvard Graphics
+
+ Several attempts were made to learn of availability of graphics
+ access to organic molecule synthesis programs but no response
+ could be generated. This project was eventually abandoned.
+
+MINIMAN Composition
+
+ As mentioned in a previous report, concise manuals are needed for
+ network resources so that uniniated users may gain basic familiarity
+ with foreign systems. In addition, manuals which describe specific
+ network wide functions, such as Fortran compilors, are needed if
+ resource sharing is to become a real trait of the ARPANET. For the
+ resources evaluated, each group member submitted two reports
+
+
+
+Pickens [Page 2]
+
+RFC 519 Resource Evaluation June 1973
+
+
+ analagous to the two types of MINIMANS needed in the network. The
+ headings and format of the reports will be included here to stimulate
+ future discussion on MINIMAN composition.
+
+ REPORT # 1: Online Help for [a specific host computer]
+
+ I. Connection, Login, and Optimal TELNET Settings
+
+ II. Help Files
+
+ III. Job Status
+
+ IV. Time of Day
+
+ V. Time/Money Used/Left
+
+ VI. Interpersonal Communications
+
+ A. Console Linking
+
+ B. Location of Users
+
+ C. Mail Facilities
+
+ D. Access to Operator and/or Consultants
+
+ VII. Warnings or Unfriendly User Behavior
+
+ VIII. Useful References and Documentation
+
+ REPORT #2: How to Use [a specific resource]
+
+ I. Table of Contents
+
+ II. Access and Usage (or How to Start and Stop)
+
+ III. Editing Commands and File Structures
+
+ IV. Documentation, Location, and Cost
+
+ V. Sample Solutions and Significant Problems
+
+ VI. Appendices
+
+ A. Special Characters and Terminal Settings
+
+ B. Similarities and Differences from Site to Site
+
+
+
+
+Pickens [Page 3]
+
+RFC 519 Resource Evaluation June 1973
+
+
+Future Test Groups
+
+ A number of projects are envisioned for future resource evaluators
+ and include:
+
+ 1. Complete evaluation of APL at MULTICS and UCSD with comparison to
+ the On-Line System (OLS).
+
+ 2. Investigate BASIC in depth, network wide.
+
+ 3. Evaluate other symbolic manipulation programs such as REDUCE.
+
+ 4. Summarize all games available in the network.
+
+ 5. Find and evaluate specific application programs such as ZOG or the
+ weather data base at CCA.
+
+ The projects undertaken will be determined in part by local
+ interests. But a serious effort is being made for reports to
+ accompany each evaluation.
+
+Conclusion
+
+ Good results have been obtained from the two test groups thus far.
+ Although composed of novices, as far as network familiarity is
+ concerned, the groups have been able to produce data and reports
+ which benefit the network community. The reports run the gambit from
+ poor to excellent, but even the poorer ones have generated results by
+ motivating more knowledgeable system personnel to find time to write
+ the report in the "right" way. All data and reports compiled by
+ these groups are available to interested network users. In addition,
+ any information or documentation or manuals which might fit into the
+ framework of the MINIMAN is requested from the network community. As
+ this information begins to be collected, the network may truly start
+ to become a resource sharing network.
+
+
+ [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+ [ into the online RFC archives by Nasser M. Akhtar 2/98 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pickens [Page 4]
+