diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc519.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc519.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc519.txt | 227 |
1 files changed, 227 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..73d9759 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc519.txt @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group J. Pickens +Request for Comments: 519 Computer Systems Laboratory -- UCSB +NIC: 16818 June 1973 + + + Resource Evaluation + +Abstract + + In the spirit of RFC # 369, Evaluation of ARPANET resources, a new + test group was organized at UCSB to take a detailed look at specific + network resources and develop initial site dependent and function + dependent MINIMAN's (Concise User Manuals). As the group was again + composed of novices, initial effort revolved about basic procedural + indoctrination. In the period between January and March 1973 a + number of resources were investigated with varying degrees of + success, as to availability, proper usage, sample problem solutions, + and access to help and documentation. Included in this paper are a + summary of the projects undertaken, initial suggestions at MINIMAN + composition, and suggestions for future test groups. As these groups + are attempting to perform a useful function for the ARPANET + community, comments and suggestions are requested. Copies of the + reports described herein are available on request from the Computer + Systems Laboratory at UCSB. + +Resources Investigated by the Group + + I. APL + + APL was investigated primarily at MULTICS. UCSD was also + scheduled for evaluation but not carried out. APL at MULTICS was + used to solve a few trivial problems. Most effort revolved about + the difficult task of obtaining any available documentation. The + octal codes for APL characters were obtained and mapped into the + OLS keyboard. A side goal of the project, the comparison of APL + with OLS, was begun but progressed very little. + + II. Basic + + Basic was investigated at a number of TENEX sites. Differences + between sites were pointed out and necessary file manipulation + commands were documented. An integration problem was written at + one site, sent via FTP to another site, and then run again to show + comparative execution times and compatability. Non-PDP/10 sites + were investigated but no report was submitted. + + + + + + +Pickens [Page 1] + +RFC 519 Resource Evaluation June 1973 + + + III. TSO + + IBM's Time Sharing option was exercised at UCLA-CCN. Interesting + results were obtained regarding cost and execution time. + Available commands were documented and a PL/1 program was written + and executed. + + IV. MIT-MATHLAB + + This, the most successful of the projects, involved documentation + of help, file manipulation, and MACSYMA access and an original + research project in resource sharing. A recursive problem in + pattern recognition and a triple integration were solved to + demonstrate MACSYMA generated expressions into user programs on + the OLS. More information on this project is forthcoming. + + V. Local User Guide + + A first pass network users manual was completed for UCSB users. + In it are described console access and settings, character + mappings, current servers, users and TIPs, and error conditions. + Following minor revisions this guide will be distributed to local + users. + + VI. Local IMLAC Access to Network + + Access to network graphics programs was attempted with a local + IMLAC. Due to the non-uniformity of network IMLACs very little + success was obtained. However, a program to access SRI-ARC's NLS + was compiled and loaded from NIC and attempts were made to iron + out the bugs. In addition a project was begun to maintain an + IMLAC library and compiler locally for network usage. As in the + other projects, basic operating procedures were documented. + + VII. Harvard Graphics + + Several attempts were made to learn of availability of graphics + access to organic molecule synthesis programs but no response + could be generated. This project was eventually abandoned. + +MINIMAN Composition + + As mentioned in a previous report, concise manuals are needed for + network resources so that uniniated users may gain basic familiarity + with foreign systems. In addition, manuals which describe specific + network wide functions, such as Fortran compilors, are needed if + resource sharing is to become a real trait of the ARPANET. For the + resources evaluated, each group member submitted two reports + + + +Pickens [Page 2] + +RFC 519 Resource Evaluation June 1973 + + + analagous to the two types of MINIMANS needed in the network. The + headings and format of the reports will be included here to stimulate + future discussion on MINIMAN composition. + + REPORT # 1: Online Help for [a specific host computer] + + I. Connection, Login, and Optimal TELNET Settings + + II. Help Files + + III. Job Status + + IV. Time of Day + + V. Time/Money Used/Left + + VI. Interpersonal Communications + + A. Console Linking + + B. Location of Users + + C. Mail Facilities + + D. Access to Operator and/or Consultants + + VII. Warnings or Unfriendly User Behavior + + VIII. Useful References and Documentation + + REPORT #2: How to Use [a specific resource] + + I. Table of Contents + + II. Access and Usage (or How to Start and Stop) + + III. Editing Commands and File Structures + + IV. Documentation, Location, and Cost + + V. Sample Solutions and Significant Problems + + VI. Appendices + + A. Special Characters and Terminal Settings + + B. Similarities and Differences from Site to Site + + + + +Pickens [Page 3] + +RFC 519 Resource Evaluation June 1973 + + +Future Test Groups + + A number of projects are envisioned for future resource evaluators + and include: + + 1. Complete evaluation of APL at MULTICS and UCSD with comparison to + the On-Line System (OLS). + + 2. Investigate BASIC in depth, network wide. + + 3. Evaluate other symbolic manipulation programs such as REDUCE. + + 4. Summarize all games available in the network. + + 5. Find and evaluate specific application programs such as ZOG or the + weather data base at CCA. + + The projects undertaken will be determined in part by local + interests. But a serious effort is being made for reports to + accompany each evaluation. + +Conclusion + + Good results have been obtained from the two test groups thus far. + Although composed of novices, as far as network familiarity is + concerned, the groups have been able to produce data and reports + which benefit the network community. The reports run the gambit from + poor to excellent, but even the poorer ones have generated results by + motivating more knowledgeable system personnel to find time to write + the report in the "right" way. All data and reports compiled by + these groups are available to interested network users. In addition, + any information or documentation or manuals which might fit into the + framework of the MINIMAN is requested from the network community. As + this information begins to be collected, the network may truly start + to become a resource sharing network. + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Nasser M. Akhtar 2/98 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + +Pickens [Page 4] + |