diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc5803.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc5803.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc5803.txt | 227 |
1 files changed, 227 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc5803.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc5803.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1b29993 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc5803.txt @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. Melnikov +Request for Comments: 5803 Isode Limited +Category: Informational July 2010 +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted + Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets + +Abstract + + This memo describes how the "authPassword" Lightweight Directory + Access Protocol (LDAP) attribute can be used for storing secrets used + by the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Message (SCRAM) + mechanism in the Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) + framework. + +Status of This Memo + + This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is + published for informational purposes. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents + approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet + Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5803. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + + + + +Melnikov Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 5803 LDAP Schema for Storing SCRAM Secrets July 2010 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Overview ........................................................2 + 2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................3 + 3. Security Considerations .........................................3 + 4. Acknowledgements ................................................4 + 5. Normative References ............................................4 + +1. Overview + + This document describes how the authPassword LDAP attribute + [AUTHPASS] can be used for storing secrets used by [SCRAM] Simple + Authentication and Security Layer [RFC4422] Mechanisms. + + The "scheme" part of the authPassword attribute is the SCRAM + mechanism name (always without the "-PLUS" suffix), e.g., "SCRAM- + SHA-1". See [SCRAM] for the exact syntax of SCRAM mechanism + names. + + The "authInfo" part of the authPassword attribute is the iteration + count (iter-count in the ABNF below), followed by ":" and base64- + encoded [BASE64] salt. + + The "authValue" part of the authPassword attribute is the base64- + encoded [BASE64] StoredKey [SCRAM], followed by ":" and base64- + encoded [BASE64] ServerKey [SCRAM]. + + Syntax of the attribute can be expressed using ABNF [RFC5234]. Non- + terminal references in the following ABNF are defined in either + [AUTHPASS], [RFC4422], or [RFC5234]. + + scram-mech = "SCRAM-SHA-1" / scram-mech-ext + ; Complies with ABNF for <scheme> + ; defined in [AUTHPASS]. + + scram-authInfo = iter-count ":" salt + ; Complies with ABNF for <authInfo> + ; defined in [AUTHPASS]. + + scram-authValue = stored-key ":" server-key + ; Complies with ABNF for <authValue> + ; defined in [AUTHPASS]. + + iter-count = %x31-39 *DIGIT + ; SCRAM iteration count. + ; A positive number without leading zeros. + + salt = <base64-encoded value> + + + +Melnikov Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 5803 LDAP Schema for Storing SCRAM Secrets July 2010 + + + stored-key = <base64-encoded value> + ; See definition in [SCRAM]. + + server-key = <base64-encoded value> + ; See definition in [SCRAM]. + + scram-mech-ext = "SCRAM-" 1*9mech-char + ; Other SCRAM mechanisms registered + ; in the IANA registry for SASL + ; mechanism names. + + mech-char = <Defined in RFC 4422> + + Note that the authPassword attribute is multivalued. For example, it + may contain multiple SCRAM hashes for different hashing algorithms. + +2. Conventions Used in This Document + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. + +3. Security Considerations + + This document defines how the authPassword attribute can be used to + store SCRAM secrets. Therefore, security considerations relevant to + [SCRAM] and hash functions used with it are also relevant to this + document. + + General security considerations related to the authPassword attribute + (as specified in [AUTHPASS]) also apply to the use of authPassword as + specified in this document. In particular, the values of + authPassword SHOULD be protected as if they were cleartext passwords. + A read operation on this attribute that is not protected by a privacy + layer (such as IPsec or TLS) can expose this attribute to an attacker + who a) would be able to use the intercepted value to impersonate the + user to all servers providing SCRAM access using the same hash + function, password, iteration count, and salt or b) would be able to + perform an offline dictionary or brute-force attack in order to + recover the user's password. + + Servers MUST validate the format of the authPassword attribute before + using it for performing a SCRAM authentication exchange. It is + possible that an attacker compromised the LDAP server or got access + to the entry containing the attribute in order to exploit a + vulnerability in the subsystem performing the SCRAM authentication + + + + + +Melnikov Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 5803 LDAP Schema for Storing SCRAM Secrets July 2010 + + + exchange. Big iteration counts and invalid base64 encoding are two + possible (but not the only) exploits in the format specified in the + document. + +4. Acknowledgements + + The author gratefully acknowledges the feedback provided by Chris + Newman, Kurt Zeilenga, Chris Lonvick, Peter Saint-Andre, Barry Leiba, + and Chris Ridd. + +5. Normative References + + [AUTHPASS] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP Authentication Password Schema", + RFC 3112, May 2001. + + [BASE64] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data + Encodings", RFC 4648, October 2006. + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC4422] Melnikov, A. and K. Zeilenga, "Simple Authentication and + Security Layer (SASL)", RFC 4422, June 2006. + + [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. + + [SCRAM] Menon-Sen, A., Newman, C., Melnikov, A., and N. Williams, + "Salted Challenge Response Authentication Message (SCRAM) + SASL Mechanisms", RFC 5802, July 2010. + +Author's Address + + Alexey Melnikov + Isode Limited + 5 Castle Business Village + 36 Station Road + Hampton, Middlesex TW12 2BX + UK + + EMail: alexey.melnikov@isode.com + URI: http://www.melnikov.ca/ + + + + + + + + + +Melnikov Informational [Page 4] + |