diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc5831.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc5831.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc5831.txt | 955 |
1 files changed, 955 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc5831.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc5831.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5954d5e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc5831.txt @@ -0,0 +1,955 @@ + + + + + + +Independent Submission V. Dolmatov, Ed. +Request for Comments: 5831 Cryptocom, Ltd. +Category: Informational March 2010 +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + GOST R 34.11-94: Hash Function Algorithm + +Abstract + + This document is intended to be a source of information about the + Russian Federal standard hash function (GOST R 34.11-94), which is + one of the Russian cryptographic standard algorithms (called GOST + algorithms). Recently, Russian cryptography is being used in + Internet applications, and this document has been created as + information for developers and users of GOST R 34.11-94 for hash + computation. + +Status of This Memo + + This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is + published for informational purposes. + + This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other + RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at + its discretion and makes no statement about its value for + implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by + the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet + Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5831. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. + + This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not + be created, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to + translate it into languages other than English. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................3 + 1.1. General Information ........................................3 + 1.2. The Purpose of GOST R 34.11-94 .............................3 + 2. Applicability ...................................................3 + 3. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................4 + 4. General Statements ..............................................5 + 5. Step-by-Step Hash Function ......................................5 + 5.1. Key Generation .............................................5 + 5.2. Encryption Transformation ..................................7 + 5.3. Mixing Transformation ......................................7 + 6. The Calculation Procedure for a Hash Function ...................8 + 7. Test Examples (Informative) .....................................9 + 7.1. Usage of the Algorithm GOST 28147-89 ......................10 + 7.2. Representation of Vectors .................................11 + 7.3. Examples of the Hash Value Calculation ....................11 + 7.3.1. Hash Calculation for the Sample Message M ..........11 + 7.3.2. Hash Calculation for the Sample Message M ..........14 + 8. Security Considerations ........................................16 + 9. Normative References ...........................................16 + 10. Contributors ..................................................17 + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +1. Introduction + +1.1. General Information + + 1. GOST R 34.11-94 [GOST3411] was developed by the Federal Agency + for Government Communication and Information and by the All-Russia + Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization. + + 2. GOST R 34.11-94 was accepted and activated by Act 154 of + 23.05.1994 issued by the Russian Federal committee for standards. + +1.2. The Purpose of GOST R 34.11-94 + + Expanding the application of information technologies when creating, + processing, and storing documents requires, in some cases, + confidentiality of their contents, maintenance of completeness, and + authenticity. + + Cryptography (cryptographic security) is one of the effective + approaches for data security. It is widely applied in different + areas of government and commercial activity. + + Cryptographic data security methods are under serious scientific + research and standardization efforts at national, regional, and + international levels. + + GOST R 34.11-94 defines a hash function calculation procedure for an + arbitrary sequence of binary symbols. + + The hash function maps an arbitrary set of data represented as a + sequence of binary symbols onto its image of a fixed small length. + + Thus, hash functions can be used in procedures related to the + electronic digital signature, resulting in considerable reduction of + elapsed time for the sign and verify stages. The effect of the + reduction of time is due to the fact that only a short image of + initial data is actually signed. + +2. Applicability + + GOST R 34.11-94 defines an algorithm and procedure for the + calculation of a hash function for an arbitrary sequence of binary + symbols. These algorithms and procedures should be applied in + cryptographic methods of data processing and securing, including + digital signature procedures employed for data transfer and data + storage in computer-aided systems. + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + The hash function, defined in GOST R 34.11-94, is used for digital + signature systems based on the asymmetric cryptographic algorithm + according to GOST R 34.10-2001 (see section 3). + +3. Conventions Used in This Document + + The following notations are used in GOST R 34.11-94: + + V_all is a set of all finite words in the alphabet V = {0,1}. The + words are read from right to left and the alphabet symbols are + numbered from right to left (i.e., the rightmost symbol of the word + has the number one, the second rightmost symbol has number two, + etc.). + + Vk is a set of all words in alphabet V = {0,1} of length k bits + (k=16,64,256). + + |A| is the length of a word A belonging to V_all. + + A||B is a concatenation of words A, B belonging to V_all. Its length + is |A| + |B|, where the left |A| symbols come from the word A, and + the right |B| symbols come from the word B. One can also use the + notation A||B = A * B. + + A^k is a concatenation of k copies of the word A (A belongs to + V_all). + + <N>_k is a word of length k, containing a binary representation of + N(mod 2^k) residue, with a non-negative integer N. + + A^$ is a non-negative integer with A as its binary representation. + + (xor) is the bitwise modulo 2 addition of the words of the same + length. + + (+)' is the addition according to the rule A (+)' B = <A^$+ B^$>_k, + where k = |A| = |B|. + + M is a binary sequence to be hashed, M belongs to V_all. M is a + message in digital signature systems. + + h is a hash function that maps the sequence M belonging to V_all onto + the word h(M) belonging to V_256. + + E(k,A) is a result of the encryption of the word A using key K with + the encryption algorithm according to [GOST28147] in the electronic + codebook (ECB) mode (K belongs to V256, A belongs to V64). + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + h0 is an initial hash value. + + e := g is the assignment of the value g to the parameter e. + + ^ is the power operator. + + i = 1..8 is an interval with i being all the values from 1 to 8. + + hUZ is the S-boxes described in [GOST28147]. + +4. General Statements + + A hash function h is the mapping h : V_all -> V256, depending on the + parameter (which is the initial hash value H, H is a word from V256). + To define the hash function, it is necessary to have: + + - a calculation algorithm for the step-by-step hash function + + chi : V256 x V256 -> V256 + + - a description of an iterative procedure for calculating the hash + value h + + A hash function h depends on two parameters, h0 and hUZ. + +5. Step-by-Step Hash Function + + A calculation algorithm for the step-by-step hash function contains + three parts, which successively do: + + - key generation, here keys are 256-bit words; + + - an encryption transformation, that is encryption of 64-bit + subwords of word H using keys K[i], (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) with the + algorithm according to [GOST28147] in ECB mode; and + + - a mixing transformation for the result of the encryption. + +5.1 Key Generation + + Consider X = (b[256], b[255], ..., b[1]) belongs to V256. + + Let: + + X = x[4]||x[3]||x[2]||x[1] = eta[16]||[eta15]||...||eta[1] + + = xi[32]||xi[31]||...||xi[1], where + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 5] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + x[i] = (b[i*64],...,b[(i-1)*64+1]) belongs to V64, i = 1..4, + + eta[j] = (b[j*16],...,b[(j-1)*16+1]) belongs to V16, j = 1..16, + + xi[k] = (b[k*8],..., b[(k-1)*8+1]) belongs to V8, k = 1..32. + + Yet, another notation: A(X) = (x[1](xor)x[2])||x[4]||x[3]||x[2]. + + The transformation P : V256 -> V256 maps the word xi32||...||xi1 + onto the word xi[phi(32)] || ... || xi[phi(1)], + + where phi(i + 1 + 4 ( k - 1) ) = 8i + k , i = 0..3, k = 1..8. + + For the key generation, one should use the following initial data: + + - words H, M belonging to V256, + + - parameters: words C[i] (i = 2, 3, 4), with values: + + C[2] = C[4] = 0^256; + + C[3] = 1^8||0^8||1^16||0^24||1^16||0^8||(0^8||1^8)^2||1^8||0^8 + ||(0^8||1^8)^4||(1^8||0^8 )^4. + + The following algorithm is used for the key calculation: + + 1. Assign values: + + i := 1, U := H , V := M. + + 2. Calculate: + + W = U (xor) V , K[i] = P(W). + + 3. Assign: + + i := i + 1. + + 4. Verify condition: + + i = 5. + + If it is true, go to step 7. If not, go to step 5. + + 5. Calculate: + + U := A(U)(xor)C[i], V := A(A(V)), + W := U(xor)V, K[i] = P(W). + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 6] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + 6. Go to step 3. + + 7. End. + +5.2. Encryption Transformation + + At this stage, 64-bit subwords of the word H are encrypted using keys + K[i] (i = 1, 2, 3, 4). + + For the encryption transformation, one should use the following + initial data: + + H = h[4]||h[3]||h[2]||h[1], + + where h[i] belongs to V64, i = 1,2,3,4, and a key set is K[1], K[2], + K[3], K[4]. + + The encryption algorithm is applied and the following words are + obtained: + + s[i] = E(K[i],h[i]), where: i = 1,2,3,4 + + As a result of the stage, the following sequence is formed: + + S = s[4]||s[3]||s[2]||s[1]. + +5.3. Mixing Transformation + + At this stage, the obtained sequence is mixed using a shift register. + + The initial data includes words H, M belonging to V256 and a word S + belonging to V256 . + + Let a mapping PSI(X) : V256(2) -> V256(2) transform the word: + + eta[16]||eta[15]||...||eta[1], eta[i] belongs to V16, i = 1..16 + + into the word: + + eta[1](xor)eta[2](xor)eta[3](xor)eta[4](xor)eta[13](xor)eta[16] + ||eta[16]||...||eta[2]. + + Then, the value of the step-by-step hash function value is the word: + + chi(M, H) = PSI^61(H(xor)PSI(M(xor)PSI^12(S))), + + where PSI^i(X) is the transformation PSI applied i times to X. + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 7] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +6. The Calculation Procedure for a Hash Function + + The calculation procedure for a hash function h is assumed to be + applied to a sequence M belonging to V_all. Its parameter is an + initial hash value h0, which is an arbitrarily fixed word from V256. + + The calculation procedure for the function h uses the following + quantities at each step of iteration: + + _M_ belonging to V_all - a part of the sequence M, which was not + hashed at previous iterations; + + H belonging to V256 - the current hash value; + + SIGMA belonging to V256 - the current check sum value; + + L belonging to V256 - the length of the partial sequence M processed + at the previous iteration step. + + The calculation algorithm for function h consists of the following + steps: + + Step 1. Assign initial values to current quantities: + + 1.1 _M_ := M. + + 1.2 H := h0. + + 1.3 SIGMA := 0^256. + + 1.4 L := 0^256. + + 1.5 Go to step 2. + + Step 2. + + 2.1 Verify the condition |_M_|>256. + + If it is true, go to step 3. + + Else, make the following calculations: + + 2.2 L := <L^$ + |M|>_256 + + 2.3 M' := 0^(256 -|M|)||M + + 2.4 SIGMA := SIGMA (+)' M' + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 8] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + 2.5 H := chi (M', H) + + 2.6 H := chi (L, H) + + 2.7 H := chi (SIGMA, H) + + 2.8 End. + + Step 3. + + 3.1 Calculate a subword M_s belonging to V256 of the word _M_ + (_M_ = M_p||M_s). Then make the following calculations: + + 3.2 H := chi (M_s, H) + + 3.3 L := <L^$ + 256>_256 + + 3.4 SIGMA := SIGMA (+)' M[s] + + 3.5 _M_ = M_p + + 3.6 Go to step 2. + + The quantity H obtained at step 2.7 is the value of the hash function + h(M). + +7. Test Examples (Informative) + + It is recommended to use the values for substitution units pi[1], + pi[2],..., pi[8] and the initial hash value H described in this + appendix for the GOST R 34.11-94 test examples only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 9] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +7.1. Usage of the Algorithm GOST 28147-89 + + The algorithm GOST 28147-89 [GOST28147] in ECB mode is used as an + encryption transformation in the following examples. The following + values of the substitution units pi[1], pi[2],..., pi[8] have been + chosen: + + 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 + + 0 1 D 4 6 7 5 E 4 + + 1 F B B C D 8 B A + + 2 D 4 A 7 A 1 4 9 + + 3 0 1 0 1 1 D C 2 + + 4 5 3 7 5 0 A 6 D + + 5 7 F 2 F 8 3 D 8 + + 6 A 5 1 D 9 4 F 0 + + 7 4 9 D 8 F 2 A E + + 8 9 0 3 4 E E 2 6 + + 9 2 A 6 A 4 F 3 B + + 10 3 E 8 9 6 C 8 1 + + 11 E 7 5 E C 7 1 C + + 12 6 6 9 0 B 6 0 7 + + 13 B 8 C 3 2 0 7 F + + 14 8 2 F B 5 9 5 5 + + 15 C C E 2 3 B 9 3 + + The hexadecimal value of pi[j](i) is given in a column number j, + + j = 1..8, and in a row number i, i = 0..15. + + + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 10] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +7.2. Representation of Vectors + + We will put down binary symbol sequences as hexadecimal digits + strings, where each digit corresponds to four signs of its binary + representation. + +7.3 Examples of the Hash Value Calculation + + A zero vector, for example, can be taken as an initial hash value: + + h0 = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + +7.3.1. Hash Calculation for the Sample Message M + + M = 73657479 62203233 3D687467 6E656C20 + 2C656761 7373656D 20736920 73696854 + + Initial values are assigned for the text: + + _M_ = 73657479 62203233 3D687467 6E656C20 + 2C656761 7373656D 20736920 73696854 + + for the hash function: + + H = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + + for the sum of text blocks: + + + SIGMA = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + + for the length of the text: + + L = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + + If the length of the message to be hashed equals 256 bits (32 bytes), + then: + + L = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000100 + + M' = _M_ = 73657479 62203233 3D687467 6E656C20 + 2C656761 7373656D 20736920 73696854 + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 11] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + and there is no need to pad the current block with zeroes: + + SIGMA=M' = 73657479 62203233 3D687467 6E656C20 + 2C656761 7373656D 20736920 73696854 + + The step-by-step hash function chi(M, N) values are calculated. + + The keys are generated: + + K[1] = 733D2C20 65686573 74746769 326C6568 + 626E7373 20657369 79676120 33206D54 + + K[2] = 110C733D 0D166568 130E7474 06417967 + 1D00626E 161A2065 090D326C 4D393320 + + K[3] = 80B111F3 730DF216 850013F1 C7E1F941 + 620C1DFF 3ABAE91A 3FA109F2 F513B239 + + K[4] = A0E2804E FF1B73F2 ECE27A00 E7B8C7E1 + EE1D620C AC0CC5BA A804C05E A18B0AEC + + The 64-bit subwords of block H are encrypted by the algorithm + according to GOST 28147. + + Block h[1] = 00000000 00000000 is encrypted using key K[1] and + s[1] = 42ABBCCE 32BC0B1B is obtained. + + Block h[2] = 00000000 00000000 is encrypted using key K[2] and + s[2] = 5203EBC8 5D9BCFFD is obtained. + + Block h[3] = 00000000 00000000 is encrypted using key K[3] and + s[3] = 8D345899 00FF0E28 is obtained. + + Block h[4] = 00000000 00000000 is encrypted using key K[4] and + s[4] = E7860419 0D2A562D is obtained. + + So S = E7860419 0D2A562D 8D345899 00FF0E28 + 5203EBC8 5D9BCFFD 42ABBCCE 32BC0B1B + + is obtained. + + The mixing transformation using a shift register is performed and + + KSI = chi(M, H) = CF9A8C65 505967A4 68A03B8C 42DE7624 + D99C4124 883DA687 561C7DE3 3315C034 + + is obtained. + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 12] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + Assign H = KSI and calculate chi(L, H): + + K[1] = CF68D956 9AA09C1C 8C3B417D 658C24E3 + 50428833 59DE3D15 6776A6C1 A4248734 + + K[2] = 8FCF68D9 809AA09C 3C8C3B41 C7658C24 + BB504288 2859DE3D 666676A6 B3A42487 + + K[3] = 4E70CF97 3C8065A0 853C8CC4 57389A8C + CABB50BD E3D7A6DE D1996788 5CB35B24 + + K[4] = 584E70CF C53C8065 48853C8C 1657389A + EDCABB50 78E3D7A6 EED19867 7F5CB35B + + S = 66B70F5E F163F461 468A9528 61D60593 + E5EC8A37 3FD42279 3CD1602D DD783E86 + + KSI = 2B6EC233 C7BC89E4 2ABC2692 5FEA7285 + DD3848D1 C6AC997A 24F74E2B 09A3AEF7 + + Now assign H = KSI again and calculate chi( SIGMA, H): + + K[1] = 5817F104 0BD45D84 B6522F27 4AF5B00B + A531B57A 9C8FDFCA BB1EFCC6 D7A517A3 + + K[2] = E82759E0 C278D950 15CC523C FC72EBB6 + D2C73DA8 19A6CAC9 3E8440F5 C0DDB65A + + K[3] = 77483AD9 F7C29CAA EB06D1D7 841BCAD3 + FBC3DAA0 7CB555F0 D4968080 0A9E56BC + + K[4] = A1157965 2D9FBC9C 088C7CC2 46FB3DD2 + 7684ADCB FA4ACA06 53EFF7D7 C0748708 + + S = 2AEBFA76 A85FB57D 6F164DE9 2951A581 + C31E7435 4930FD05 1F8A4942 550A582D + + KSI = FAFF37A6 15A81669 1CFF3EF8 B68CA247 + E09525F3 9F811983 2EB81975 D366C4B1 + + Then, the hash result is: + + H = FAFF37A6 15A81669 1CFF3EF8 B68CA247 + E09525F3 9F811983 2EB81975 D366C4B1 + + + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 13] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +7.3.2. Hash Calculation for the Sample Message M + + Let M = 7365 74796220 3035203D 20687467 6E656C20 + 73616820 65676173 73656D20 6C616E69 + 6769726F 20656874 2065736F 70707553 + + As the length of the message to be hashed equals 400 bits (50 bytes), + the message is divided into two blocks, and the second (high-order) + one is padded with zeroes. During the calculations the following + numbers are obtained: + + STEP 1. + + H = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + + M_s = 73616820 65676173 73656D20 6C616E69 + 6769726F 20656874 2065736F 70707553 + + K[1] = 73736720 61656965 686D7273 20206F6F + 656C2070 67616570 616E6875 73697453 + + K[2] = 14477373 0C0C6165 1F01686D 4F002020 + 4C50656C 04156761 061D616E 1D277369 + + K[3] = CBFF14B8 6D04F30C 96051FFE DFFFB000 + 35094CAF 72F9FB15 7CF006E2 AB1AE227 + + K[4] = EBACCB00 F7006DFB E5E16905 B0B0DFFF + BA1C3509 FD118DF9 F61B830F F8C554E5 + + S = FF41797C EEAADAC2 43C9B1DF 2E14681C + EDDC2210 1EE1ADF9 FA67E757 DAFE3AD9 + + KSI = F0CEEA4E 368B5A60 C63D96C1 E5B51CD2 + A93BEFBD 2634F0AD CBBB69CE ED2D5D9A + + STEP 2. + + H = F0CEEA4E 368B5A60 C63D96C1 E5B51CD2 + A93BEFBD 2634F0AD CBBB69CE ED2D5D9A + + M' = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00007365 + 74796220 3035203D 20687467 6E656C20 + + K[1] = F0C6DDEB CE3D42D3 EA968D1D 4EC19DA9 + 36E51683 8BB50148 5A6FD031 60B790BA + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 14] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + K[2] = 16A4C6A9 F9DF3D3B E4FC96EF 5309C1BD + FB68E526 2CDBB534 FE161C83 6F7DD2C8 + + K[3] = C49D846D 1780482C 9086887F C48C9186 + 9DCB0644 D1E641E5 A02109AF 9D52C7CF + + K[4] = BDB0C9F0 756E9131 E1F290EA 50E4CBB1 + 1CAD9536 F4E4B674 99F31E29 70C52AFA + + S = 62A07EA5 EF3C3309 2CE1B076 173D48CC + 6881EB66 F5C7959F 63FCA1F1 D33C31B8 + + KSI = 95BEA0BE 88D5AA02 FE3C9D45 436CE821 + B8287CB6 2CBC135B 3E339EFE F6576CA9 + + STEP 3. + + H = 95BEA0BE 88D5AA02 FE3C9D45 436CE821 + B8287CB6 2CBC135B 3E339EFE F6576CA9 + + L = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000190 + + K[1] = 95FEB83E BE3C2833 A09D7C9E BE45B6FE + 88432CF6 D56CBC57 AAE8136D 02215B39 + + K[2] = 8695FEB8 1BBE3C28 E2A09D7C 48BE45B6 + DA88432C EBD56CBC 7FABE813 F292215B + + K[2] = 8695FEB8 1BBE3C28 E2A09D7C 48BE45B6 + DA88432C EBD56CBC 7FABE813 F292215B + + K[3] = B9799501 141B413C 1EE2A062 0CB74145 + 6FDA88BC D0142A6C FA80AA16 15F2FDB1 + + K[4] = 94B97995 7D141B41 C21EE2A0 040CB741 + 346FDA88 46D0142A BDFA81AA DC1562FD + + S = D42336E0 2A0A6998 6C65478A 3D08A1B9 + 9FDDFF20 4808E863 94FD9D6D F776A7AD + + KSI = 47E26AFD 3E7278A1 7D473785 06140773 + A3D97E7E A744CB43 08AA4C24 3352C745 + + STEP 4. + + H = 47E26AFD 3E7278A1 7D473785 06140773 + A3D97E7E A744CB43 08AA4C24 3352C745 + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 15] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + + SIGMA = 73616820 65676173 73656D20 6C61E1CE + DBE2D48F 509A88B1 40CDE7D6 DED5E173 + + K[1] = 340E7848 83223B67 025AAAAB DDA5F1F2 + 5B6AF7ED 1575DE87 19E64326 D2BDF236 + + K[2] = 03DC0ED0 F4CD26BC 8B595F13 F5A4A55E + A8B063CB ED3D7325 6511662A 7963008D + + K[3] = C954EF19 D0779A68 ED37D3FB 7DA5ADDC + 4A9D0277 78EF765B C4731191 7EBB21B1 + + K[4] = 6D12BC47 D9363D19 1E3C696F 28F2DC02 + F2137F37 64E4C18B 69CCFBF8 EF72B7E3 + + S = 790DD7A1 066544EA 2829563C 3C39D781 + 25EF9645 EE2C05DD A5ECAD92 2511A4D1 + + KSI = 0852F562 3B89DD57 AEB4781F E54DF14E + EAFBC135 0613763A 0D770AA6 57BA1A47 + + Then, the hash result is: + + H = 0852F562 3B89DD57 AEB4781F E54DF14E + EAFBC135 0613763A 0D770AA6 57BA1A47 + +8. Security Considerations + + This entire document is about security considerations. + + Current cryptographic resistance of GOST R 34.11-94 hash algorithm is + estimated as 2^128 operations of computations of step hash functions. + (There is a known method to reduce this estimate to 2^105 operations, + but it demands padding the colliding message with 1024 random bit + blocks each of 256-bit length; thus, it cannot be used in any + practical implementation). + +9. Normative References + + [GOST28147] "Cryptographic Protection for Data Processing System", + GOST 28147-89, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of USSR, + Government Committee of the USSR for Standards, 1989. + (In Russian) + + [GOST3411] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. + Hashing function.", GOST R 34.10-94, Gosudarstvennyi + Standard of Russian Federation, Government Committee of + the Russia for Standards, 1994. (In Russian) + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 16] + +RFC 5831 GOST R 34.11-94 March 2010 + + +10. Contributors + + Dmitry Kabelev + Cryptocom, Ltd. + 14 Kedrova St., Bldg. 2 + Moscow, 117218 + Russian Federation + + + EMail: kdb@cryptocom.ru + + Igor Ustinov + Cryptocom, Ltd. + 14 Kedrova St., Bldg. 2 + Moscow, 117218 + Russian Federation + + EMail: igus@cryptocom.ru + + + Sergey Vyshensky + Moscow State University + Leninskie gory, 1 + Moscow, 119991 + Russian Federation + + EMail: svysh@pn.sinp.msu.ru + +Author's Address + + Vasily Dolmatov, Ed. + Cryptocom, Ltd. + 14 Kedrova St., Bldg. 2 + Moscow, 117218 + Russian Federation + + EMail: dol@cryptocom.ru + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dolmatov Informational [Page 17] + |