diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc6338.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6338.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc6338.txt | 619 |
1 files changed, 619 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6338.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6338.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..13b5bea --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6338.txt @@ -0,0 +1,619 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) V. Giralt +Request for Comments: 6338 Univ. Malaga +Category: Informational R. McDuff +ISSN: 2070-1721 Univ. Queensland + August 2011 + + + Definition of a Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace + for the Schema for Academia (SCHAC) + +Abstract + + This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for + the Schema for Academia (SCHAC). + + The namespace described in this document is for naming persistent + resources defined by the SCHAC participants internationally, their + working groups, and other designated subordinates. The main use of + this namespace will be for the creation of controlled vocabulary + values for attributes in the SCHAC schema. These values will be + associated with particular instances of persons or objects belonging + to any of the SCHAC object classes. + +Status of This Memo + + This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is + published for informational purposes. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents + approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet + Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6338. + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + +1. Introduction + + The Schema for Academia (SCHAC) international activity was born + inside the Task Force on European Middleware Coordination and + Collaboration (TF-EMC2) of the Trans-European Research and Education + Networking Association (TERENA) [6]. The initial aim of SCHAC was to + harmonize the disjoint person schemas of the participating countries + in order to have a common way for expressing data about persons, + exchanged between educational organizations. SCHAC, as are other + person schemas, is designed to ease the sharing of information about + a given individual between parties, mostly, but not limited to, + educational and research institutions. The main aims of this sharing + are to provide resources to individuals and to allow said individuals + to move, virtually and physically, between such institutions. Thus, + the SCHAC schema was defined with input from all participants' + national person schemas [7]. + + SCHAC does not supplant other person schemas such as + organizationalPerson [8], inetOrgPerson [9], or eduPerson [10]; it + extends those where needed for the purposes of Higher Education + outside the United States. This characteristic has made SCHAC, + originally a European effort, useful for groups outside Europe. + +2. Requirements Language + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1]. + + + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + +3. Specification Template + + Namespace ID: + + schac + + Registration Information: + + Registration Version Number 1 + + Registration Date: 2011-06-22 + + Registrant of the namespace: + + European Committee for Academic Middleware (ECAM) + Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association + (TERENA) + Singel + Amsterdam + The Netherlands + + Designated contacts: + + Contact: Licia Florio + Affiliation: TERENA + Singel 468 D + Amsterdam, 1017 AW + The Netherlands + + EMail: florio@terena.org + Phone: +31(0)20 5304488 + + + Contact: Victoriano Giralt + Affiliation: University of Malaga + Central ICT Services + Blvd. Louis Pasteur, 33 + Campus de Teatinos + 29071 Malaga + Spain + + EMail: victoriano@uma.es + Phone: +34 95 213 1415 + + + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + + Syntactic structure: + + The Namespace Specific Strings (NSSs) of all URNs assigned by + SCHAC will conform to the syntax defined in Section 2.2 of + RFC 2141, "URN Syntax" [11]. In addition, all SCHAC URN NSSs will + consist of a left-to-right series of tokens delimited by colons. + The left-to-right sequence of colon-delimited tokens corresponds + to descending nodes in a tree. To the right of the lowest naming + authority node, there may be zero, one, or more levels of + hierarchical naming nodes terminating in a rightmost leaf node. + See the "Identifier assignment" section below for more on the + semantics of NSSs. This syntax convention is captured in the + following normative ABNF rules for SCHAC NSSs (see RFC 5234 [2]): + + SCHAC-NSS = 1*subStChar *( ":" 1*subStChar ) + + subStChar = trans / "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG + + trans = ALPHA / DIGIT / other / reserved + + other = "(" / ")" / "+" / "," / "-" / "." / + "=" / "@" / ";" / "$" / + "_" / "!" / "*" / "'" + + reserved = "/" / "?" / "#" + + The exclusion of the colon from the list of "other" characters + means that the colon can only occur as a delimiter between string + tokens. Note that this ABNF rule set guarantees that any valid + SCHAC NSS is also a valid RFC 2141 NSS. + + Relevant ancillary documentation: + + None. + + Identifier uniqueness: + + It is the responsibility of TERENA to guarantee uniqueness of the + names of immediately subordinate naming authorities. Each lower- + level naming authority in turn inherits the responsibility of + guaranteeing uniqueness of names in its branch of the naming tree. + + + + + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + + Identifier persistence: + + TERENA bears ultimate responsibility for maintaining the usability + of SCHAC URNs over time. This responsibility MAY be delegated to + subordinate naming authorities per the discussion in the section + below on identifier assignment. That section provides a mechanism + for the delegation to be revoked in the case where a subordinate + naming authority ceases to function. + + Identifier assignment: + + TERENA will create an initial series of immediately subordinate + naming authorities, and will define a process for adding to that + list of authorities. Such a list, and the policy for adding to + it, will be published at the root registry page. Each country + with a representative in SCHAC will be invited to designate a + naming authority. Country-specific namespaces based on the + country Internet Top-Level Domain (TLD) [12] will then be assigned + to the designated authority. The subordinated namespaces int and + eu will remain under TERENA authority, controlled by the SCHAC + activity members, for entities of global, international, or + European interest. There is also the possibility of granting + subordinate namespaces to multi-country organizations; in this + case, the organizational Internet Fully Qualified Domain Name + (FQDN) will be used as the prefix. + + As an example, a European-level interest entity would be any value + related to information used in the Higher Education European + Space, or the so-called Bologna process. Such entities will + belong in the eu subordinate namespace. + + Global international entities could encompass values related to + the Grid community or values useful both for some European and for + some Australian universities. Such entities would belong in the + int subordinate namespace. + + Examples of multi-country organizations include TERENA itself or + an association like the Educational Policy Institute (EPI) + (educationalpolicy.org) that has members from Australia, Canada, + and the US. + + URNs intended for values of SCHAC attributes will include the + attribute name immediately after the NSS prefix, before any + geographical namespace delegation, such that any string can convey + information about the attribute for which it is a value. For + example, values for schacUserStatus will be of the form: + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 5] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + + urn:schac:userStatus:int + urn:schac:userStatus:au or + urn:schac:userStatus:terena.org + + If at all possible, automated registry publication mechanisms will + be provided, based on the work on distributed URN registries done + by the TF-EMC2 task force members. + + Institutions and communities affiliated with SCHAC participants + may request that they be granted subordinate naming authority + status. Uniqueness of these namespaces under country authority + will be based on the requestor's Internet FQDN. This + subordination procedure SHOULD be carried along the delegation + chain; i.e., if at all possible, all entities that receive a + delegated namespace MUST have a valid FQDN and MUST publish an + Internet accessible URN value registry, based on the URN registry + mechanisms designed by the TF-EMC2 task force members. + + On at least an annual basis, TERENA will contact the liaisons or + directors of each immediately subordinate naming authority. If + there is no response, or if the respondent indicates that they + wish to relinquish naming authority, the authority over that + branch of the tree reverts to TERENA. This process will be + enforced recursively by each naming authority on its subordinates. + This process guarantees that responsibility for each branch of the + tree will lapse for less than one year, at worst, before being + reclaimed by a superior authority. + + Lexical equivalence of two SCHAC Namespace Specific Strings (NSSs) + is defined below as an exact, case-sensitive string match. TERENA + will assign names of immediately subordinate naming authorities in + lowercase only. This forestalls the registration of two SCHAC- + subordinate naming authorities whose names differ only in case. + Attribute names will use the same mixed-case format as in the + schema definition. + + Identifier resolution: + + The namespace is not currently listed with a Resolution Discovery + System (RDS), but nothing about the namespace prohibits the future + definition of appropriate resolution methods or listing with + an RDS. + + TERENA will maintain a registry of all SCHAC-assigned URN values, + both final and for delegation, on its web site: + + https://urnreg.terena.org/ + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 6] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + + Delegation entries will have a pointer to the registry of the + subordinate naming authority. This SHOULD recurse down the + delegation tree, but registries for several delegated namespaces + MAY be maintained by a single naming authority. + + All registries MUST publish their URNs over https links [3]. The + https links MUST be secured by sites offering credentials signed + by a SCHAC-community recognized Certification Authority (CA) using + the latest secure methods for accessing a web site (which at + present is the latest version of Transport Layer Security (TLS) + [4]). Registries SHOULD consider the user interface implications + of their choice of CA, taking into account issues like browser + alerts and blind trust. + + Lexical equivalence: + + Lexical equivalence of two SCHAC Namespace Specific Strings (NSSs) + is defined as an exact, case-sensitive string match. + + Conformance with URN syntax: + + All SCHAC NSSs fully conform to RFC 2141 syntax rules for NSSs. + + Validation mechanism: + + As specified in the "Identifier resolution" section above, TERENA + will maintain an index of all SCHAC-assigned URNs on its web site: + https://urnreg.terena.org/. Presence in that registry or in any + subordinate registry implies that a given URN is valid. Delegated + naming authorities MUST guarantee that values are valid in their + assigned spaces. + + Scope: + + Global. + +4. Examples + + The following examples are not guaranteed to be real. They are + listed for pedagogical reasons only. + + urn:schac:personalUniqueID:es:DNI:9999999Z + urn:schac:personalUniqueCode:es:uma.es:codUni:061696758X + urn:schac:userStatus:au:uq.edu.au:service:mail:receive:disabled + urn:schac:personalPosition:pl:umk.pl:programmer + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 7] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + +5. Security Considerations + + There are no additional security considerations beyond those normally + associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general. + + In order to guarantee the validity and origin of SCHAC-NSS URN + values, they MUST be published over https links [3]. The https links + MUST be secured by sites offering credentials signed by a SCHAC- + community recognized Certification Authority (CA) using the latest + secure methods for accessing a web site (which at present is the + latest version of TLS [4]). + +6. Namespace Considerations + + Registration of a Namespace Identifier (NID) specific to SCHAC is + reasonable given the following considerations: + + SCHAC would like to assign URNs to some very fine-grained objects. + This does not seem to be the primary intended use of the XML.org + namespace (RFC 3120) [13], or the more tightly controlled + Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information + Standards (OASIS) [14] namespace (RFC 3121) [15]. + + SCHAC seeks naming autonomy. SCHAC is not a member of OASIS, so + becoming a subordinate naming authority under the OASIS URN space + is not an option. There is the MACE (Middleware Architecture + Committee for Education) (RFC 3613) [16] namespace, but the SCHAC + development is done outside of the MACE activity scope; thus, the + attributes and values do not belong in the MACE namespace. Using + the MACE namespace requires that the SCHAC namespace be placed + under one of the SCHAC participants' namespaces, which hinders its + global scope. + + SCHAC will want to assign URNs to non-XML objects as well. That + is another reason that XML.org may not be an appropriate higher- + level naming authority for SCHAC. + + Some of the already defined SCHAC attribute values have been assigned + URNs under the urn:mace:terena.org namespace. These values will + enter a deprecation cycle, with a clear indication that they will be + replaced by values under the new namespace once it is assigned. In + any case, RFC 3406 [5] (which replaced RFC 2611) includes an explicit + statement that two or more URNs may point to the same resource. + + + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 8] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + +7. Community Considerations + + The assignment and use of identifiers within the namespace are open, + and the related rule is established by the SCHAC activity members. + Registration agencies (the next-level naming authorities) will be the + National Research and Education Networks (NRENs) and established + organizational cross-border organizations that participate in SCHAC. + + It is expected that the majority of the European NRENs, their + constituencies, participants in the Australian Access Federation, and + some other international activities will make use of the SCHAC + namespace. + + After the establishment of the SCHAC namespace, TERENA will establish + a registry service (analogously to other distributed pan-European + services, such as eduroam, PerfSONAR, etc.) for the namespace + clients. This registry will be available via the root page of the + namespace: https://urnreg.terena.org/. The policy for registrations + will be defined in documents available at the root page of the + registry. + +8. IANA Considerations + + In accordance with BCP 66 [5], IANA has registered the Formal URN + Namespace 'schac' in the Registry of URN Namespaces, using the + registration template presented in Section 2 of this document. + +9. Acknowledgments + + SCHAC is the result of the TERENA TF-EMC2 task force and many others + that have contributed ideas to the development of the schema. + + This document was discussed on the URN-NID list, with the special + help of Alfred Hoenes, who thoroughly reviewed the document, helped + us correct errors, and suggested clarifications to the text. + + Peter Saint-Andre has also provided comments that have improved the + overall document quality, for which we herein thank him. We'd also + like to thank Chris Lonvick for helping us express our security + concerns in a better way. Finally, we thank other reviewers that + have helped us to give the final touches to the text. + + Special thanks should go to Dyonisius Visser from the TERENA + technical team for taking the time and effort required to set up the + root instance of the namespace registry. + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 9] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + +10. References + +10.1. Normative References + + [1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement + Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [2] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. + + [3] Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000. + + [4] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) + Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008. + + [5] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, + "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms", + BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002. + +10.2. Informative References + + [6] TERENA, "Trans-European Research and Education Networking + Association", <http://www.terena.org/>. + + [7] TERENA TF-EMC2, "SCHAC activity web site", + <http://www.terena.org/activities/tf-emc2/schac.html>. + + [8] Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol + (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC 4519, June 2006. + + [9] Smith, M., "Definition of the inetOrgPerson LDAP Object Class", + RFC 2798, April 2000. + + [10] MACE-Dir, "eduPerson Object Class Specification", + December 2007, <http://middleware.internet2.edu/eduperson/docs/ + internet2-mace-dir-eduperson-200712.html>. + + [11] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. + + [12] IANA, "Country TLDs", <http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/>. + + [13] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for XML.org", RFC 3120, + June 2001. + + [14] OASIS, "Organization for the Advancement of Structured + Information Standards: OASIS", <http://www.oasis-open.org/>. + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 10] + +RFC 6338 SCHAC URN Namespace August 2011 + + + [15] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for OASIS", RFC 3121, + June 2001. + + [16] Morgan, R. and K. Hazelton, "Definition of a Uniform Resource + Name (URN) Namespace for the Middleware Architecture Committee + for Education (MACE)", RFC 3613, October 2003. + +Authors' Addresses + + Victoriano Giralt, M.D. + University of Malaga + Avd. Cervantes, 2 + Malaga, Malaga E-29071 + Spain + + Phone: +34-95-213-1415 + EMail: victoriano@uma.es + URI: http://www.uma.es/ + + + Dr. Rodney McDuff + The University of Queensland + + EMail: r.mcduff@uq.edu.au + URI: http://www.uq.edu.au/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Giralt & McDuff Informational [Page 11] + |