diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc653.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc653.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc653.txt | 88 |
1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc653.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc653.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..514f407 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc653.txt @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +TELNET OUTPUT HORIZONTAL TABSTOPS OPTION +RFC 653, NIC 31156 (Oct. 25, 1974) +D. Crocker (UCLA-NMC) +Online file: [ISI]<DCROCKER>NAOHTS.TXT + + TELNET OUTPUT HORIZONTAL TABSTOPS OPTION + +1. Command name and code + NAOHTS 11 (Negotiate About Output Horizontal Tabstops) + +2. Command meanings + In the following, we are discussing a simplex connection, as described in + the NAOL and NAOP Telnet options. + IAC DO NAOHTS + The data sender requests or agrees to negotiate about output + horizontal tabstops with the data receiver. In the case where + agreement has been reached and in the absence of further + subnegotiations, the data receiver is assumed to be handling output + horizontal tabstops. + IAC DON'T NAOHTS + The data sender refuses to negotiate about output horizontal tabstops + with the data receiver, or demands a return to the unnegotiated + default mode. + IAC WILL NAOHTS + The data receiver requests or agrees to negotiate about output + horizontal tabstops with the sender. In the case where agreement has + been reached and in the absence of further subnegotiations, the data + receiver alone is assumed to be handling output horizontal tabstops. + IAC WON'T NAOHTS + The data receiver refuses to negotiate about output horizontal + tabstops, or demands a return to the unnegotiated default mode. + IAC SB NAOHTS DS <8-bit value> ... <8-bit value> IAC SE + The data sender specifies, with the 8-bit value(s), which party should + handle output horizontal tabstop considerations and what the stops + should be. The code for DS is 1. + IAC SB NAOHTS DR <8-bit value> ... <8-bit value> IAC SE + The data receiver specifies, with the 8-bit value(s), which party + should handle output horizontal tabstop considerations and what the + stops should be. The code for DR is 0. + +3. Default + DON'T NAOHTS/WON'T NAOHTS. + In the default absence of negotiations concerning which party, data + sender or data receiver, is handling output horizontal tabstops, neither + party is required to handle them and neither party is prohibited from + handling them; but it is appropriate if at least the data receiver + handles horizontal tabstops, albeit primitively. + +4. Motivation for the Option + Please refer to section 4 of the NAOL and of the NAOP Telnet option + descriptions. + +5. Description of the Option + The data sender and the data receiver use the 8-bit value(s) along with the + DS and DR SB subcommands as follows (multiple 8-bit values are allowed only + if each is greater than zero and less than 251): + + 8-bit value : Meaning : + + 0 Command sender suggests that he alone will handle + tabstops, for the connection. + 1 to 250 Command sender suggests that the other party alone + should handle tabstop considerations, but suggests + that the indicated value(s) be used. The value(s) + are the column numbers, relative to the physical + left side of the printer page or terminal screen, + that are to be set. + 251 to 254 Not allowed, in order to be compatible with + related Telnet options. + 255 Command sender suggests that the other party alone + should handle output tabstops and suggests nothing + about how it should be done. + + The guiding rules are that: + (1) if neither data receiver nor data sender wants to handle output + horizontal tabstops, the data receiver must do it, and + (2) if both data receiver and data sender want to handle output + horizontal tabstops, the data sender gets to do it. + The reasoning for the former rule is that if neither wants to do it, then + the default in the NAOHTS option dominates. If both want to do it, the + sender, who is presumed to have special knowledge about the data, should be + allowed to do it, taking into account any suggestions the receiver may make. + As with all option negotiations, neither party should suggest a state + already in effect except to refuse to negotiate; changes should be + acknowledged; and once refused, an option should not be resuggested until + "something changes" (e.g., another process starts). + At any time, either party can disable further negotiation by giving the + appropriate WON'T NAOHTS or DON'T NAOHTS command. |