diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc6786.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6786.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc6786.txt | 619 |
1 files changed, 619 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6786.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6786.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0193b25 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6786.txt @@ -0,0 +1,619 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. Yegin +Request for Comments: 6786 Samsung +Category: Standards Track R. Cragie +ISSN: 2070-1721 Gridmerge Ltd. + November 2012 + + + Encrypting the Protocol for Carrying Authentication for + Network Access (PANA) Attribute-Value Pairs + +Abstract + + This document specifies a mechanism for delivering the Protocol for + Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Attribute-Value + Pairs (AVPs) in encrypted form. + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6786. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................2 + 1.1. Specification of Requirements ..............................2 + 2. Details .........................................................3 + 3. Encryption Keys .................................................3 + 4. Encryption-Algorithm AVP ........................................4 + 4.1. AES128_CTR Encryption Algorithm ............................5 + 5. Encryption-Encap AVP ............................................6 + 6. Encryption Policy ...............................................6 + 6.1. Encryption Policy Specification ............................7 + 7. Security Considerations .........................................8 + 7.1. AES-CTR Security Considerations ............................9 + 8. IANA Considerations .............................................9 + 8.1. PANA AVP Codes .............................................9 + 8.2. PANA Encryption-Algorithm AVP Values .......................9 + 8.3. PANA AVP Codes Encryption Policy ..........................10 + 9. Acknowledgments ................................................10 + 10. Normative References ..........................................10 + +1. Introduction + + PANA [RFC5191] is a UDP-based protocol to perform an Extensible + Authentication Protocol (EAP) authentication between a PANA Client + (PaC) and a PANA Authentication Agent (PAA). + + Various types of payload are exchanged as part of the network access + authentication and authorization. These payloads are carried in PANA + Attribute-Value Pairs (AVPs). AVPs can be integrity protected using + the AUTH AVP when EAP authentication generates cryptographic keying + material. AVPs are transmitted in the clear (i.e., not encrypted). + + Certain payload types need to be delivered privately (e.g., network + keys, private identifiers, etc.). This document defines a mechanism + for applying encryption to selected AVPs. + +1.1. Specification of Requirements + + In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements + of the specification. These words are often capitalized. The key + words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", + "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document + are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. + + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + +2. Details + + This document extends the AVP set defined in Section 8 of [RFC5191] + by defining two new AVPs: the Encryption-Algorithm AVP (see Section + 4) and the Encryption-Encap AVP (see Section 5). Two new encryption + keys, PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY, are defined to encrypt + AVPs from the PaC to the PAA and AVPs from the PAA to the PaC, + respectively (see Section 3). + + When encryption is needed, the required algorithm is negotiated as + follows: the PAA SHALL send the initial PANA-Auth-Request carrying + one or more Encryption-Algorithm AVPs supported by it. The PaC SHALL + select one of the algorithms from this AVP, and it SHALL respond with + the initial PANA-Auth-Answer carrying one Encryption-Algorithm AVP + for the selected algorithm. Once PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and + PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY have been generated, a PANA message MAY contain an + Encryption-Encap AVP. + +3. Encryption Keys + + PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY is used for encrypting the AVP payload of the + Encryption-Encap AVP sent in a PANA message from the PaC to the PAA. + + PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY SHALL be computed according to the following + formula: + + PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY = prf+(MSK, "IETF PANA PaC Encr" | I_PAR | + I_PAN | PaC_nonce | PAA_nonce | Key_ID) + + PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY is used for encrypting the AVP payload of the + Encryption-Encap AVP sent in a PANA message from the PAA to the PaC. + PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY SHALL be computed according to the following + formula: + + PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY = prf+(MSK, "IETF PANA PAA Encr" | I_PAR | + I_PAN | PaC_nonce | PAA_nonce | Key_ID) + + In both cases: + + - The prf+ function is defined in the Internet Key Exchange + Protocol version 2 (IKEv2) [RFC5996]. + + - The pseudo-random function (PRF) to be used for the prf+ + function SHALL be negotiated using the PRF-Algorithm AVP in the + initial PANA-Auth-Request and PANA-Auth-Answer exchange with + the 'S' (Start) bit set as described in Section 4.1 of + [RFC5191]. + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + + - MSK is the master session key (MSK) generated by the EAP method + [RFC3748]. PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY MUST be + recalculated whenever a new MSK is generated by the EAP method. + + - "IETF PANA PaC Encr" and "IETF PANA PAA Encr" are the ASCII + code representations of the respective non-NULL terminated + strings (excluding the double quotes around them). + + - I_PAR and I_PAN are the initial PANA-Auth-Request and + PANA-Auth-Answer messages (the PANA header and the following + PANA AVPs) with the 'S' (Start) bit set, respectively. + + - PaC_nonce and PAA_nonce are values of the Nonce AVP carried in + the first non-initial PANA-Auth-Answer and PANA-Auth-Request + messages in the authentication and authorization phase or the + first PANA-Auth-Answer and PANA-Auth-Request messages in the + re-authentication phase, respectively. + + - Key_ID is the value of the Key-Id AVP. + + The length of PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY depends on the + encryption algorithm in use. + +4. Encryption-Algorithm AVP + + The Encryption-Algorithm AVP (AVP code 13) is used for conveying the + encryption algorithm to be used with the Encryption-Encap AVP. The + AVP value data is of type Unsigned32. + + Only one encryption algorithm identifier AES128_CTR (code 1) is + identified by this document. Encryption algorithm identifier values + other than 1 are reserved for future use. Future specifications are + allowed to extend this list. + + AES128_CTR: 1 + + In the absence of an application profile specifying otherwise, all + implementations SHALL support AES128_CTR. + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + +4.1. AES128_CTR Encryption Algorithm + + The AES128_CTR encryption algorithm uses the AES-CTR (Counter) mode + of operation as specified in [NIST_SP800_38A] using the AES-128 block + cipher. The formatting function and counter generation function, as + specified in Appendix A of [NIST_SP800_38C], are used with the + following parameters: + + n = 12, + q = 3 + + The 12-octet nonce consists of a 4-octet Key-Id, a 4-octet Session + ID, and a 4-octet Sequence Number in that order where each 4-octet + value is encoded in network byte order. The Session ID and Sequence + Number values SHALL be the same as those in the PANA message carrying + the key Encryption-Encap AVP. The Key-Id value SHALL be the same as + the one used for deriving PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY. + The output blocks of the encryption processing are encoded as + OctetString data in the Value field of a Encryption-Encap AVP. + + Note that the first counter block used for encryption is Ctr_1, where + "_1" denotes "subscript 1" as described in Appendix A.3 of + [NIST_SP800_38C]. For example, given the following: + + Key-Id = 0x55667788, + Session ID = 0xaabbccdd, + Sequence Number = 0x11223344 + + The first counter block used for encryption will be: + + 0x0255667788aabbccdd11223344000001 + + where the initial 0x02 represents the Flags field of the counter + block. + + The nonce meets the requirement of uniqueness-per-key usage provided + that the sequence number does not wrap. Therefore, for the purpose + of generating new keys: + + - If Encryption-Encap AVPs are being sent from the PaC to the PAA + and the sequence number is about to wrap, the PaC SHALL + initiate PANA re-authentication as described in Section 4.3 of + [RFC5191]. + + - If Encryption-Encap AVPs are being sent from the PAA to the PaC + and the sequence number is about to wrap, the PAA SHALL + initiate PANA re-authentication as described in Section 4.3 of + [RFC5191]. + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + + Re-authentication ensures the generation of a new MSK [RFC3748] and + thus a new PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY. + +5. Encryption-Encap AVP + + The Encryption-Encap AVP (AVP code 12) is used to encrypt one or more + PANA AVPs. The format of the Encryption-Encap AVP depends on the + negotiated encryption algorithm. + + When the negotiated encryption algorithm identifier is AES128_CTR + (code 1), AVP data payload is occupied by the encrypted AVPs. + + There SHALL be only one Encryption-Encap AVP in a PANA message. All + AVPs that require encryption SHALL be encapsulated within the + Encryption-Encap AVP. + + The Encryption-Encap AVP uses either PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY or + PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY, and the encryption algorithm negotiated by the + Encryption-Algorithm AVP. The Encryption-Encap AVP SHALL only be + used if the EAP method generates cryptographic keys (specifically, + the MSK [RFC3748]). + + The Encryption-Encap AVP MAY be used in a PANA message from the PaC + to the PAA when the encryption algorithm has been successfully + negotiated and once PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY has been generated. + + The Encryption-Encap AVP MAY be used in a PANA message from the PAA + to the PaC when the encryption algorithm has been successfully + negotiated and once PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY has been generated. + + The Encryption-Encap AVP MAY be used in the very first PANA message + carrying the Result-Code AVP set to PANA_Success value and any + subsequent message within the same PANA session. + +6. Encryption Policy + + The specification of any AVP SHOULD state that the AVP either shall + or shall not be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP. The + specification of an AVP MAY state that the AVP may (or may not) be + encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP. The specification SHOULD + use a table in the format specified in Section 6.1. If the + specification of an AVP is silent about whether the AVP shall or + shall not be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP, this implies + that the AVP MAY be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP. + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 6] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + +6.1. Encryption Policy Specification + + This section defines a table format for the specification of whether + an AVP shall or shall not be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap + AVP. + + The table uses the following symbols: + + Y: The AVP SHALL be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP. If the + AVP is encountered not encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP, + it SHALL be considered invalid and the message containing the AVP + SHALL be discarded. + + N: The AVP SHALL NOT be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP. If + the AVP is encountered encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP, + it SHALL be considered invalid and the message containing the AVP + SHALL be discarded. + + X: The AVP MAY be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP. If the + AVP is encountered either encrypted or not encrypted using the + Encryption-Encap AVP, it SHALL be considered valid. + + The legitimate occurrence of unencrypted AVPs and AVPs after + decryption and unencapsulation SHALL be subject to the AVP Occurrence + Table (Figure 4 in [RFC5191]). + + The following table shows the encryption requirements for the + existing AVPs defined in [RFC5191]: + + Attribute Name |Enc| + ----------------------+---+ + AUTH | N | + EAP-Payload | X | + Integrity-Algorithm | N | + Key-Id | N | + Nonce | N | + PRF-Algorithm | N | + Result-Code | N | + Session-Lifetime | X | + Termination-Cause | X | + ----------------------+---+ + + + + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 7] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + + The following table shows the encryption requirements for the AVPs + defined in [RFC6345]: + + Attribute Name |Enc| + ----------------------+---+ + PaC-Information | N | + Relayed-Message | N | + ----------------------+---+ + + The following table shows the encryption requirements for the AVPs + defined in this document: + + Attribute Name |Enc| + ----------------------+---+ + Encryption-Algorithm | N | + Encryption-Encap | N | + ----------------------+---+ + + The following table is an example showing the encryption requirements + for a newly defined AVP, Example-AVP: + + Attribute Name |Enc| + ----------------------+---+ + Example-AVP | Y | + ----------------------+---+ + + The guidance for specifying the encryption requirements for a newly + defined AVP is as follows: + + Y: If the payload needs privacy against eavesdroppers (e.g., carrying + a secret key). + + N: If the payload may need to be observed by on-path network elements + (i.e., subject to deep packet inspection). + + X: If neither concern applies. + +7. Security Considerations + + PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY are secret keys shared + between the PaC and the PAA. They SHALL NOT be used for purposes + other than those specified in this document. Compromise of these + keys would lead to compromise of the secret information protected by + these keys. + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 8] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + +7.1. AES-CTR Security Considerations + + The use of AES-CTR encryption has its own security considerations, + which are detailed in the Security Considerations section of + [RFC3686]. Specifically: + + - The nonce specified in Section 4.1 meets the requirement of + uniqueness-per-key usage. + + - Section 4.1 of [RFC5191] states that if the EAP method + generates cryptographic keys, an AUTH AVP will always be + present in every PANA message after key generation. Therefore, + an Encryption-Encap AVP will always be sent in conjunction with + an AUTH AVP. This meets the requirement of a companion + authentication function. + +8. IANA Considerations + + As described in Sections 4 and 5, and following the IANA allocation + policy on PANA messages [RFC5872], two PANA AVP codes and one set of + AVP values have been registered. An additional encryption policy for + AVP codes has also been registered. + +8.1. PANA AVP Codes + + The following AVP codes have been registered in the "AVP Codes" sub- + registry of the "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network + Access (PANA) Parameters" registry: + + o A standard AVP code of 12 for the Encryption-Encap AVP. + + o A standard AVP code of 13 for the Encryption-Algorithm AVP. + +8.2. PANA Encryption-Algorithm AVP Values + + The following AVP values representing the encryption algorithm + identifier for the Encryption-Algorithm AVP code have been assigned + in the "Encryption-Algorithm (AVP Code 13) AVP Values" sub-registry + under the "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access + (PANA) Parameters" registry": + + o An AVP value of 1 for AES128_CTR. + + o All other AVP values (0, 2-4294967295) are unassigned. + + The registration procedures are IETF Review or IESG Approval in + accordance with [RFC5872]. + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 9] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + +8.3. PANA AVP Codes Encryption Policy + + The additional encryption policy defined in Section 6.1 has been + added as a column labeled "Enc" in the "AVP Codes" sub-registry and + has been applied to all existing AVP codes and those defined in this + specification. + +9. Acknowledgments + + The authors would like to thank Yoshihiro Ohba, Yasuyuki Tanaka, + Adrian Farrel, Brian Carpenter, Yaron Sheffer, Ralph Droms, Stephen + Farrell, Barry Leiba, and Sean Turner for their valuable comments. + +10. Normative References + + [NIST_SP800_38A] + Dworkin, M., "Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of + Operation: Methods and Techniques", December 2001. + + [NIST_SP800_38C] + Dworkin, M., "Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of + Operation: The CCM Mode for Authentication and + Confidentiality", May 2004. + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC3686] Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) + Counter Mode With IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload + (ESP)", RFC 3686, January 2004. + + [RFC3748] Aboba, B., Blunk, L., Vollbrecht, J., Carlson, J., and H. + Levkowetz, Ed., "Extensible Authentication Protocol + (EAP)", RFC 3748, June 2004. + + [RFC5191] Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Ed., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., + and A. Yegin, "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for + Network Access (PANA)", RFC 5191, May 2008. + + [RFC5872] Arkko, J. and A. Yegin, "IANA Rules for the Protocol for + Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA)", RFC + 5872, May 2010. + + [RFC5996] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., and P. Eronen, + "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC + 5996, September 2010. + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 10] + +RFC 6786 PANA AVP Encryption November 2012 + + + [RFC6345] Duffy, P., Chakrabarti, S., Cragie, R., Ohba, Y., Ed., and + A. Yegin, "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for + Network Access (PANA) Relay Element", RFC 6345, August + 2011. + +Authors' Addresses + + Alper Yegin + Samsung + Istanbul + Turkey + + EMail: alper.yegin@yegin.org + + + Robert Cragie + Gridmerge Ltd. + 89 Greenfield Crescent + Wakefield, WF4 4WA + United Kingdom + + EMail: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Yegin & Cragie Standards Track [Page 11] + |