diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc9141.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc9141.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc9141.txt | 758 |
1 files changed, 758 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc9141.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc9141.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d1c682c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc9141.txt @@ -0,0 +1,758 @@ + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Danyliw +Request for Comments: 9141 Software Engineering Institute +Updates: 2077, 2418, 2648, 2954, 2955, 3020, November 2021 + 3083, 3201, 3202, 3295, 3684, 3962, + 3970, 4036, 4131, 4251, 4323, 4546, + 4547, 4639, 4682, 5098, 5428, 6756, + 7241 +Category: Standards Track +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + Updating References to the IETF FTP Service + +Abstract + + The IETF FTP service running at ftp.ietf.org, ops.ietf.org, and + ietf.org will be retired. A number of published RFCs in the IETF and + IAB streams include URIs that reference this FTP service. To ensure + that the materials referenced using the IETF FTP service can still be + found, this document updates the FTP-based references in these + affected documents with HTTPS URIs. + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9141. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the + Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described + in the Revised BSD License. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction + 2. Conventions and Definitions + 3. Updated References + 3.1. RFC 2077 + 3.2. RFC 2418 + 3.3. RFC 2648 + 3.4. RFC 2954 + 3.5. RFC 2955 + 3.6. RFC 3020 + 3.7. RFC 3083 + 3.8. RFC 3201 + 3.9. RFC 3202 + 3.10. RFC 3295 + 3.11. RFC 3684 + 3.12. RFC 3962 + 3.13. RFC 3970 + 3.14. RFC 4036 + 3.15. RFC 4131 + 3.16. RFC 4251 + 3.17. RFC 4323 + 3.18. RFC 4546 + 3.19. RFC 4547 + 3.20. RFC 4639 + 3.21. RFC 4682 + 3.22. RFC 5098 + 3.23. RFC 5428 + 3.24. RFC 6756 + 3.25. RFC 7241 + 3.26. Generic Guidance + 4. Security Considerations + 5. IANA Considerations + 6. References + 6.1. Normative References + 6.2. Informative References + Acknowledgments + Author's Address + +1. Introduction + + After community consultation in late 2020, it was decided to retire + the IETF FTP service running at ftp.ietf.org, ops.ietf.org, and + ietf.org [FTP-RETIREMENT]. Appendix B of [FTP-RETIREMENT-PLAN] + identifies 30 RFCs published in the IETF and IAB streams between + 1997-2006 that have at least one explicit or inline reference to a + URI pointing to the IETF FTP service. To ensure that the materials + referenced using the IETF FTP service can still be found, this + document formally updates those RFCs that had not been updated by + other documents with HTTPS URIs to the same materials. + + Section 3 enumerates each of the affected RFCs and provides + replacement text. + +2. Conventions and Definitions + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and + "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in + BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all + capitals, as shown here. + + The original text from an RFC to be updated will be quoted with + "OLD", and the replacement text will be quoted with "NEW". + +3. Updated References + + This document updates the following RFCs. + + [RFC2077] [RFC2418] [RFC2648] [RFC2954] [RFC2955] [RFC3020] [RFC3083] + [RFC3201] [RFC3202] [RFC3295] [RFC3684] [RFC3962] [RFC3970] [RFC4036] + [RFC4131] [RFC4251] [RFC4323] [RFC4546] [RFC4547] [RFC4639] [RFC4682] + [RFC5098] [RFC5428] + + Additionally, with permission of the IAB, [RFC6756] and [RFC7241] are + also updated. + +3.1. RFC 2077 + + Section 3 of [RFC2077] is updated as follows: + + OLD: + + | Copies of RFCs are available on: + | + | ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/ + | + | Copies of Internet-Drafts are available on: + | + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ + + NEW: + + | Copies of RFCs are available on: + | + | https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/ + | + | Copies of Internet-Drafts are available on: + | + | https://www.ietf.org/id/ + +3.2. RFC 2418 + + Section 2.2 of [RFC2418] is updated as follows: + + OLD: + + | Those archives are located at ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail- + | archive. + + NEW: + + | Those archives are located at https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf- + | mail-archive/. + +3.3. RFC 2648 + + Section 2 of [RFC2648] is updated below. Note that the scripts in + Appendix A have not been updated. + + OLD: + + | The list of minutes maintained by the IETF for each working group + | and conference in the subtree pointed at by the URL + | ftp://ietf.org/ietf/ is considered the definitive assignment of + | URNs for working group or birds of a feather minutes. + + NEW: + + | The list of minutes maintained by the IETF for each working group + | and conference in the subtree pointed at by the URL + | https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/proceedings/ is considered the + | definitive assignment of URNs for working group or birds of a + | feather minutes. + +3.4. RFC 2954 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 3 of [RFC2954] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Email Archive: + | + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib + + NEW: + + | Email Archive: + | + | https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib/ + +3.5. RFC 2955 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC2955] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Email Archive: + | + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib + + NEW: + + | Email Archive: + | + | https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib/ + +3.6. RFC 3020 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 3 of [RFC3020] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Email Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib + + NEW: + + | Email Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ + | frnetmib/ + +3.7. RFC 3083 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC3083] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.8. RFC 3201 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 6 of [RFC3201] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Email Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib + + NEW: + + | Email Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ + | frnetmib/ + +3.9. RFC 3202 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 7 of [RFC3202] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Email Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib + + NEW: + + | Email Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ + | frnetmib/ + +3.10. RFC 3295 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC3295] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Email Archive: + | + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/gsmp/ + + NEW: + + | Email Archive: + | + | https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/gsmp/ + +3.11. RFC 3684 + + Two informative references in Section 14.2 of [RFC3684] are updated + as follows: + + OLD: + + | [7] Ogier, R., Message in IETF email archive for MANET, + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/manet/2002-02.mail, February + | 2002. + + NEW: + + | [7] Ogier, R., Message in IETF email archive for MANET, + | https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ + | manet/2002-02.mail, February 2002. + + OLD: + + | [9] Ogier, R., Message in IETF email archive for MANET, + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/manet/2002-03.mail, March + | 2002. + + NEW: + + | [9] Ogier, R., Message in IETF email archive for MANET, + | https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ + | manet/2002-03.mail, March 2002. + +3.12. RFC 3962 + + An informative reference in [RFC3962] is updated as follows: + + OLD: + + | [LEACH] Leach, P., email to IETF Kerberos working group mailing + | list, 5 May 2003, ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/krb- + | wg/2003-05.mail. + + NEW: + + | [LEACH] Leach, P., email to IETF Kerberos working group mailing + | list, 5 May 2003, https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ + | krb-wg/2003-05.mail. + +3.13. RFC 3970 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 5 of [RFC3970] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ops.ietf.org/pub/lists + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/concluded-wg-ietf-mail- + | archive/tewg/ + +3.14. RFC 4036 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC4036] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.15. RFC 4131 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 3 of [RFC4131] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn. + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/. + +3.16. RFC 4251 + + An informative reference in [RFC4251] is updated as follows: + + OLD: + + | [DAI] Dai, W., "An attack against SSH2 protocol", Email to the + | SECSH Working Group ietf-ssh@netbsd.org ftp:// ftp.ietf.org/ietf- + | mail-archive/secsh/2002-02.mail, Feb 2002. + + NEW: + + | [DAI] Dai, W., "An attack against SSH2 protocol", Email to the + | SECSH Working Group ietf-ssh@netbsd.org https://www.ietf.org/ietf- + | ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ secsh/2002-02.mail, Feb 2002. + +3.17. RFC 4323 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 5 of [RFC4323] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.18. RFC 4546 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC4546] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.19. RFC 4547 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC4547] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.20. RFC 4639 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC4639] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.21. RFC 4682 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 4 of [RFC4682] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.22. RFC 5098 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 5 of [RFC5098] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.23. RFC 5428 + + The CONTACT-INFO in the MIB in Section 6 of [RFC5428] contains an + outdated email archive reference. The revised reference is as + follows: + + OLD: + + | Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn + + NEW: + + | Archive: https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/ipcdn/ + +3.24. RFC 6756 + + Section 2.8.1 of [RFC6756] is updated as follows: + + OLD: + + | Current list and status of all IETF RFCs: + | + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/rfc/rfc-index.txt + | + | Current list and description of all IETF Internet-Drafts: + | + | ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.txt + + NEW: + + | Current list and status of all IETF RFCs: + | + | https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc-index.txt + | + | Current list and description of all IETF Internet-Drafts: + | + | https://www.ietf.org/id/1id-abstracts.txt + +3.25. RFC 7241 + + Appendix B.2 of [RFC7241] is updated as follows: + + OLD: + + | Current list and description of all IETF Internet-Drafts: + | + | <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.txt> + + NEW: + + | Current list and description of all IETF Internet-Drafts: + | + | <https://www.ietf.org/id/1id-abstracts.txt> + +3.26. Generic Guidance + + If any other RFC not explicitly mentioned in an earlier section + contains a reference of the form "ftp://ftp.ietf.org/<path>", the + reference MUST be replaced with a URI of the form + "https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/<path>". + +4. Security Considerations + + This document does not alter the security considerations of the + updated documents. + + This document replaces URIs to the IETF infrastructure that use an + FTP scheme with equivalent HTTPS scheme URIs. These updates ensure + the continued availability of content referenced in previously + published RFCs when the IETF FTP service is retired. Additionally, + the replacement of the cleartext FTP with HTTPS will ensure that + resources on the IETF infrastructure can be accessed in a more secure + way. For example, HTTPS provides an encrypted channel that includes + protections, such as verifying the server's identity per the + certificate verification behavior of the client and integrity and + confidentiality protection commensurate with the negotiated TLS + protocol version and ciphersuite. + +5. IANA Considerations + + This document has no IANA actions. + +6. References + +6.1. Normative References + + [RFC2077] Nelson, S., Parks, C., and M. Ardron, "The Model Primary + Content Type for Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions", + RFC 2077, DOI 10.17487/RFC2077, January 1997, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2077>. + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, + DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. + + [RFC2418] Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and + Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 2418, DOI 10.17487/RFC2418, + September 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2418>. + + [RFC2648] Moats, R., "A URN Namespace for IETF Documents", RFC 2648, + DOI 10.17487/RFC2648, August 1999, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2648>. + + [RFC2954] Rehbehn, K. and D. Fowler, "Definitions of Managed Objects + for Frame Relay Service", RFC 2954, DOI 10.17487/RFC2954, + October 2000, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2954>. + + [RFC2955] Rehbehn, K., Nicklass, O., and G. Mouradian, "Definitions + of Managed Objects for Monitoring and Controlling the + Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking Function", + RFC 2955, DOI 10.17487/RFC2955, October 2000, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2955>. + + [RFC3020] Pate, P., Lynch, B., and K. Rehbehn, "Definitions of + Managed Objects for Monitoring and Controlling the UNI/NNI + Multilink Frame Relay Function", RFC 3020, + DOI 10.17487/RFC3020, December 2000, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3020>. + + [RFC3083] Woundy, R., "Baseline Privacy Interface Management + Information Base for DOCSIS Compliant Cable Modems and + Cable Modem Termination Systems", RFC 3083, + DOI 10.17487/RFC3083, March 2001, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3083>. + + [RFC3201] Steinberger, R. and O. Nicklass, "Definitions of Managed + Objects for Circuit to Interface Translation", RFC 3201, + DOI 10.17487/RFC3201, January 2002, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3201>. + + [RFC3202] Steinberger, R. and O. Nicklass, "Definitions of Managed + Objects for Frame Relay Service Level Definitions", + RFC 3202, DOI 10.17487/RFC3202, January 2002, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3202>. + + [RFC3295] Sjostrand, H., Buerkle, J., and B. Srinivasan, + "Definitions of Managed Objects for the General Switch + Management Protocol (GSMP)", RFC 3295, + DOI 10.17487/RFC3295, June 2002, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3295>. + + [RFC3684] Ogier, R., Templin, F., and M. Lewis, "Topology + Dissemination Based on Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF)", + RFC 3684, DOI 10.17487/RFC3684, February 2004, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3684>. + + [RFC3962] Raeburn, K., "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) + Encryption for Kerberos 5", RFC 3962, + DOI 10.17487/RFC3962, February 2005, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3962>. + + [RFC3970] Kompella, K., "A Traffic Engineering (TE) MIB", RFC 3970, + DOI 10.17487/RFC3970, January 2005, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3970>. + + [RFC4036] Sawyer, W., "Management Information Base for Data Over + Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Cable Modem + Termination Systems for Subscriber Management", RFC 4036, + DOI 10.17487/RFC4036, April 2005, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4036>. + + [RFC4131] Green, S., Ozawa, K., Cardona, E., Ed., and A. Katsnelson, + "Management Information Base for Data Over Cable Service + Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Cable Modems and Cable + Modem Termination Systems for Baseline Privacy Plus", + RFC 4131, DOI 10.17487/RFC4131, September 2005, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4131>. + + [RFC4251] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH) + Protocol Architecture", RFC 4251, DOI 10.17487/RFC4251, + January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4251>. + + [RFC4323] Patrick, M. and W. Murwin, "Data Over Cable System + Interface Specification Quality of Service Management + Information Base (DOCSIS-QoS MIB)", RFC 4323, + DOI 10.17487/RFC4323, January 2006, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4323>. + + [RFC4546] Raftus, D. and E. Cardona, "Radio Frequency (RF) Interface + Management Information Base for Data over Cable Service + Interface Specifications (DOCSIS) 2.0 Compliant RF + Interfaces", RFC 4546, DOI 10.17487/RFC4546, June 2006, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4546>. + + [RFC4547] Ahmad, A. and G. Nakanishi, "Event Notification Management + Information Base for Data over Cable Service Interface + Specifications (DOCSIS)-Compliant Cable Modems and Cable + Modem Termination Systems", RFC 4547, + DOI 10.17487/RFC4547, June 2006, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4547>. + + [RFC4639] Woundy, R. and K. Marez, "Cable Device Management + Information Base for Data-Over-Cable Service Interface + Specification (DOCSIS) Compliant Cable Modems and Cable + Modem Termination Systems", RFC 4639, + DOI 10.17487/RFC4639, December 2006, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4639>. + + [RFC4682] Nechamkin, E. and J-F. Mule, "Multimedia Terminal Adapter + (MTA) Management Information Base for PacketCable- and + IPCablecom-Compliant Devices", RFC 4682, + DOI 10.17487/RFC4682, December 2006, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4682>. + + [RFC5098] Beacham, G., Kumar, S., and S. Channabasappa, "Signaling + MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal + Adapters (MTAs)", RFC 5098, DOI 10.17487/RFC5098, February + 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5098>. + + [RFC5428] Channabasappa, S., De Ketelaere, W., and E. Nechamkin, + "Management Event Management Information Base (MIB) for + PacketCable- and IPCablecom-Compliant Devices", RFC 5428, + DOI 10.17487/RFC5428, April 2009, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5428>. + + [RFC6756] Trowbridge, S., Ed., Lear, E., Ed., Fishman, G., Ed., and + S. Bradner, Ed., "Internet Engineering Task Force and + International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication + Standardization Sector Collaboration Guidelines", + RFC 6756, DOI 10.17487/RFC6756, September 2012, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6756>. + + [RFC7241] Dawkins, S., Thaler, P., Romascanu, D., and B. Aboba, Ed., + "The IEEE 802/IETF Relationship", RFC 7241, + DOI 10.17487/RFC7241, July 2014, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7241>. + + [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC + 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, + May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. + +6.2. Informative References + + [FTP-RETIREMENT] + Danyliw, R., "Retirement of the IETF FTP Service", message + to the IETF mailing list, 3 March 2021, + <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vi- + 8bFqlgBFjB2jJ1SIAGHiNRdg/>. + + [FTP-RETIREMENT-PLAN] + "Retiring the IETF FTP Service (Revised Plan)", March + 2021, <https://www.ietf.org/media/documents/Revised- + Retiring-IETF-FTP-Service-2021-03.pdf>. + +Acknowledgments + + Thank you to Robert Sparks, Glen Barney, Henrik Levkowetz, and Russ + Housley on the IETF Tools Team for the operations and maintenance + information that informed the community discussion at + [FTP-RETIREMENT]. + + Additionally, thank you to Brian Carpenter, Martin Duke, Russ + Housley, Benjamin Kaduk, Eric Kline, Murray Kucherawy, Mirja + Kühlewind, Scott Mansfield, Tom Petch, John Scudder, and Rob Wilton + for their valuable feedback and reviews of the specific document + updates. + + Finally, thank you to Éric Vyncke for the sponsoring this document + and the AD review. + +Author's Address + + Roman Danyliw + Software Engineering Institute + + Email: rdd@cert.org |