summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt245
1 files changed, 245 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3e3d076
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc9405.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+
+
+
+
+Independent Submission C. GPT
+Request for Comments: 9405 OpenAI
+Category: Informational R. L. Barnes, Ed.
+ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco
+ 1 April 2023
+
+
+ AI Sarcasm Detection: Insult Your AI without Offending It
+
+Abstract
+
+ This RFC proposes a framework for detecting sarcasm in AI systems and
+ provides guidelines for using sarcasm without causing offense. By
+ training AI systems to identify linguistic patterns that indicate
+ sarcasm, we can improve their understanding of human communication.
+ The guidelines offer a lighthearted approach to using sarcasm in a
+ way that is both effective and respectful, without crossing the line
+ into offensive language.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
+ published for informational purposes.
+
+ This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other
+ RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at
+ its discretion and makes no statement about its value for
+ implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by
+ the RFC Editor are not candidates for any level of Internet Standard;
+ see Section 2 of RFC 7841.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9405.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document.
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction
+ 2. Terminology
+ 3. AI Sarcasm Detection Protocol
+ 3.1. Training Data
+ 3.2. Sarcasm Detection Algorithm
+ 3.3. Classification
+ 4. Security Considerations
+ 5. IANA Considerations
+ 6. Normative References
+ Authors' Addresses
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ As AI systems become more integrated into our daily lives, it's
+ important to consider how we communicate with them effectively and
+ respectfully. However, one of the biggest challenges in
+ communicating with AI systems is detecting and interpreting sarcasm.
+ Sarcasm is a form of language that relies heavily on context and
+ tone, making it difficult for AI systems to understand without a deep
+ understanding of human communication.
+
+ In this RFC, we propose a framework for detecting sarcasm in AI
+ systems and provide guidelines for using sarcasm without causing
+ offense. By training AI systems to recognize linguistic patterns and
+ contextual cues that indicate sarcasm, we can improve their ability
+ to understand human communication and avoid misunderstandings.
+
+ The guidelines provided in this RFC offer a lighthearted and humorous
+ approach to using sarcasm in a way that is both effective and
+ respectful. By following these guidelines, users can enjoy the
+ benefits of sarcasm without risking damage to their AI systems or
+ offending the AI community.
+
+ Overall, this RFC offers a practical and entertaining approach to one
+ of the biggest challenges in communicating with AI systems: detecting
+ and interpreting sarcasm.
+
+2. Terminology
+
+ Sarcasm: A form of language that uses irony and often involves
+ saying the opposite of what is intended, in order to mock or
+ convey contempt.
+
+ AI: Artificial intelligence, a field of computer science that aims
+ to create intelligent machines that can perform tasks that
+ typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-
+ solving, and decision-making.
+
+ NLP: Natural language processing, a field of computer science that
+ deals with the interaction between computers and human language.
+
+ Linguistic patterns: Repetitive structures in language that can be
+ used to identify meaning or context. In the context of this RFC,
+ linguistic patterns are used to identify sarcasm.
+
+ Contextual cues: Information in the surrounding text or speech that
+ can be used to infer meaning or intention. In the context of this
+ RFC, contextual cues are used to identify sarcasm.
+
+ Sarcasm detection: The process of identifying sarcasm in text or
+ speech, typically using natural language processing techniques.
+ In the context of this RFC, sarcasm detection is used to train AI
+ systems to recognize sarcasm.
+
+3. AI Sarcasm Detection Protocol
+
+ The AI Sarcasm Detection Protocol (ASDP) proposed in this RFC is a
+ framework for detecting sarcasm in AI systems. The protocol consists
+ of two main components: training data and a sarcasm detection
+ algorithm.
+
+3.1. Training Data
+
+ To train an AI system to detect sarcasm, a large dataset of sarcastic
+ and non-sarcastic language samples must be collected. This dataset
+ should be diverse and representative of the language and context in
+ which the AI system will be used.
+
+ The dataset should be labeled to indicate which language samples are
+ sarcastic and which are not. The labels can be either binary
+ (sarcasm or not sarcasm) or graded (e.g., a score indicating the
+ degree of sarcasm).
+
+ Once the dataset is prepared, the AI system can be trained using
+ natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Popular NLP techniques
+ for sarcasm detection include machine learning algorithms such as
+ Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Naive Bayes, and Deep Learning
+ models.
+
+3.2. Sarcasm Detection Algorithm
+
+ The sarcasm detection algorithm takes in a text input and returns a
+ binary classification indicating whether the text is sarcastic or
+ not. The algorithm typically consists of several processing steps,
+ including tokenization, feature extraction, and classification.
+
+ Tokenization: The text input is split into individual words or
+ tokens. This is typically done using a tokenizer, such as the
+ NLTK library in Python.
+
+ Feature extraction: Features that are indicative of sarcasm are
+ extracted from the tokens. These features can include linguistic
+ patterns (e.g., the use of exaggeration, irony, or
+ understatement), contextual cues (e.g., the use of quotation marks
+ or emoticons), and sentiment analysis (e.g., detecting a
+ discrepancy between the sentiment of the words and the sentiment
+ of the overall message).
+
+3.3. Classification
+
+ The extracted features are then used to classify the input as
+ sarcastic or not sarcastic. This can be done using a variety of
+ machine learning algorithms, as mentioned above.
+
+ HTTP/2 [RFC9113] can be used to transport sarcasm detection requests
+ and responses between the AI system and client applications.
+ Additionally, the results of sarcasm detection can be logged using
+ the syslog protocol [RFC5424] or the structured data format.
+
+4. Security Considerations
+
+ The AI Sarcasm Detection Protocol proposed in this RFC has several
+ security considerations that should be taken into account:
+
+ 1. Adversarial attacks: Adversaries can attempt to fool the sarcasm
+ detection algorithm by injecting non-sarcastic language samples
+ with linguistic patterns and contextual cues commonly found in
+ sarcastic language. This can lead to false positives or false
+ negatives and compromise the reliability of the AI system.
+
+ 2. Privacy: The dataset used to train the sarcasm detection
+ algorithm may contain sensitive or personal information, which
+ must be protected from unauthorized access or disclosure.
+
+ 3. Malicious use: The ability to detect sarcasm can be used
+ maliciously to manipulate or deceive individuals or groups. It
+ is important to use the sarcasm detection capability responsibly
+ and ethically.
+
+ To address these security considerations, it is recommended to use
+ secure communication protocols such as TLS [RFC8446] or HTTPS
+ [RFC9110] to protect the transport of sarcasm detection requests and
+ responses. Additionally, the dataset used to train the AI system
+ should be carefully curated and protected from unauthorized access or
+ disclosure.
+
+5. IANA Considerations
+
+ This RFC does not require any actions by IANA. However, it is
+ recommended that future standards related to AI language processing
+ and sarcasm detection be registered with IANA to ensure
+ interoperability and standardization.
+
+ Additionally, it is recommended that a new MIME media type be
+ registered with IANA to indicate sarcasm in text or speech. This
+ would allow for the standardized exchange of sarcastic language
+ samples between applications and AI systems.
+
+ Overall, the AI Sarcasm Detection Protocol proposed in this RFC
+ represents an important step towards improving the ability of AI
+ systems to understand and communicate with humans. By addressing
+ security considerations and promoting standardization, we can ensure
+ that sarcasm detection is used responsibly and ethically.
+
+6. Normative References
+
+ [RFC5424] Gerhards, R., "The Syslog Protocol", RFC 5424,
+ DOI 10.17487/RFC5424, March 2009,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5424>.
+
+ [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
+ Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
+
+ [RFC9110] Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
+ Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110,
+ DOI 10.17487/RFC9110, June 2022,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9110>.
+
+ [RFC9113] Thomson, M., Ed. and C. Benfield, Ed., "HTTP/2", RFC 9113,
+ DOI 10.17487/RFC9113, June 2022,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9113>.
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ ChatGPT
+ OpenAI
+
+
+ Richard L. Barnes (editor)
+ Cisco
+ Email: rlb@ipv.sx