summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1814.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1814.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1814.txt171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1814.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1814.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a1e6d1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1814.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group E. Gerich
+Request for Comments: 1814 Merit Network Inc.
+Category: Informational June 1995
+
+
+ Unique Addresses are Good
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
+ does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
+ this memo is unlimited.
+
+Abstract
+
+ The IAB suggests that while RFC 1597 establishes reserved IP address
+ space for the use of private networks which are isolated and will
+ remain isolated from the Internet, any enterprise which anticipates
+ external connectivity to the Internet should apply for a globally
+ unique address from an Internet registry or service provider.
+
+Introduction
+
+ With the advent of RFC 1466 and RFC 1597 the criteria for the
+ allocation of unique IP numbers and the reservation of unique IP
+ numbers have been defined. The IAB and the IANA wish to offer
+ guidance to the Internet registries as to the application of these
+ two documents. The author submits this document as an informational
+ RFC on behalf of the Internet Architecture Board and the IANA.
+
+Guidance to Internet Registries
+
+ RFC 1466 lists the criteria to which Internet registries should
+ conform. One of the criteria is that the Internet registry is
+ committed to allocate IP numbers according to the guidelines
+ established by the IANA and the IR. Those guidelines (for Classes A,
+ B, and C addresses) are documented in RFC 1466.
+
+ Internet Registries have agreed to comply with the guidelines
+ established by RFC 1466 and therefore, if an organization meets the
+ size requirement for the requested address(es) and submits an
+ engineering plan, the organization has fulfilled the necessary
+ requirements. The Internet Registry will make the allocation based
+ on the established criteria.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Gerich Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1814 Unique Addresses are Good June 1995
+
+
+ The preconditions defined in RFC 1466 are limited to number of hosts
+ and subnets as well as an engineering plan. The existence of private
+ address space (RFC 1597) shall not prevent an enterprise from
+ obtaining public address space according to the allocation criteria
+ (currently, RFC 1466).
+
+ An enterprise may be required by a Internet registry to submit an
+ engineering plan documenting a realistic deployment schedule and
+ reasonable attention to conservation of address space to support the
+ size of the enterprise's request for globally unique IP addresses.
+
+ It is perfectly appropriate for an Internet registry to inform an
+ organization of the provisions of RFC 1597. Any organization
+ considering the use of private network numbers should carefully
+ consider the potential advantages and possible problems as discussed
+ in RFCs 1597 and 1627.
+
+ RFC 1597 establishes reserved IP address space for the use of private
+ networks which are isolated and will remain isolated from the
+ Internet. Thus RFC 1597 documents a way that private enterprises may
+ assure that their networks will remain segregated from the Internet.
+ The addresses designated in RFC 1597 should not be routed by the
+ Internet.
+
+ Any enterprise with a significantly large number of hosts which might
+ require external connectivity to the Internet at the IP layer should
+ apply for a block of globally unique addresses from an Internet
+ registry. Enterprises with a small to medium number of hosts that
+ require external connectivity to the Internet at the IP layer should
+ expect to use globally unique addresses for these hosts, assigned to
+ them by their current Internet service provider from its own assigned
+ addresses, if it has such addresses to distribute.
+
+ If an enterprise with a small to medium number of hosts desires
+ unique IP addresses, and is unable to obtain them under reasonable
+ conditions from a service provider, or has no service provider, the
+ Internet registries are recommended to assign such addresses without
+ conditions with respect to service provider selection. The
+ registries should make clear to the enterprise that when the
+ enterprise decides to connect to the Internet, the assigned addresses
+ are no guarantee of Internet-wide IP connectivity. In fact, some
+ service providers may require renumbering as a condition of
+ connectivity.
+
+ Any organization which anticipates having external connectivity is
+ encouraged to apply for a globally unique IP address. Globally
+ unique addresses are necessary to differentiate between destinations
+ on the Internet. One must understand, however, that the globally
+
+
+
+Gerich Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1814 Unique Addresses are Good June 1995
+
+
+ unique address by itself does not necessarily guarantee global
+ connectivity. Individual network service providers may place
+ restrictions on what addresses they will or will not route based on
+ operational limitations.
+
+References
+
+ [1] Gerich, E., "Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space", RFC
+ 1466, Merit Network Inc., May 1993.
+
+ [2] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, B., Karrenberg, D., and G. de Groot,
+ "Address Allocation for Private Internets", RFC 1597, T.J. Watson
+ Research Center, IBM Corp., Chrysler Corp., RIPE NCC, RIPE NCC,
+ March 1994.
+
+Security Considerations
+
+ Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Elise Gerich
+ Merit Network Inc.
+ 4251 Plymouth Road
+ Ann Arbor, MI 48105
+
+ Phone: +1 313 764 9430
+ Fax: +1 313 747 3745
+ EMail: epg@merit.edu
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Gerich Informational [Page 3]
+