diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3664.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc3664.txt | 227 |
1 files changed, 227 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3664.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3664.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6de3d91 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3664.txt @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group P. Hoffman +Request for Comments: 3664 VPN Consortium +Category: Standards Track January 2004 + + + The AES-XCBC-PRF-128 Algorithm for + the Internet Key Exchange Protocol (IKE) + +Status of this Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. + +Abstract + + Some implementations of IP Security (IPsec) may want to use a + pseudo-random function derived from the Advanced Encryption Standard + (AES). This document describes such an algorithm, called AES-XCBC- + PRF-128. + +1. Introduction + + [AES-XCBC-MAC] describes a method to use the Advanced Encryption + Standard (AES) as a message authentication code (MAC) whose output is + 96 bits long. While 96 bits is considered appropriate for a MAC, it + is too short to be useful as a long-lived pseudo-random (PRF) in + either IKE version 1 or version 2. Both versions of IKE use the PRF + to create keys in a fashion that is dependent on the length of the + output of the PRF. Using a PRF that has 96 bits of output creates + keys that are easier to attack with brute force than a PRF that uses + 128 bits of output. + + Fortunately, there is a very simple method to use much of [AES-XCBC- + MAC] as a PRF whose output is 128 bits: omit the step that truncates + the 128-bit value to 96 bits. + + + + + + + + + +Hoffman Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 3664 The AES-XCBC-PRF-128 Algorithm for IKE January 2004 + + +2. The AES-XCBC-PRF-128 Algorithm + + The AES-XCBC-PRF-128 algorithm is identical to [AES-XCBC-MAC] except + that the truncation step in section 4.3 of [AES-XCBC-MAC] is *not* + performed. That is, there is no processing after section 4.2 of + [AES-XCBC-MAC]. + + The test vectors in section 4.6 can be used for AES-XCBC-PRF-128, but + only those listed as "AES-XCBC-MAC", not "AES-XCBC-MAC-96". + +3. Security Considerations + + The security provided by AES-XCBC-MAC-PRF is based upon the strength + of AES. At the time of this writing, there are no known practical + cryptographic attacks against AES or AES-XCBC-MAC-PRF. + + As is true with any cryptographic algorithm, part of its strength + lies in the security of the key management mechanism, the strength of + the associated secret key, and upon the correctness of the + implementations in all of the participating systems. [AES-XCBC-MAC] + contains test vectors to assist in verifying the correctness of the + AES-XCBC-MAC-PRF code. The test vectors all show the full MAC value + before it is truncated to 96 bits. The PRF makes use of the full MAC + value, not the truncated one. + +4. Intellectual Property Statement + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it + has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the + IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and + standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of + claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of + licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to + obtain a general license or permission for the use of such + proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can + be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive + Director. + + + + + +Hoffman Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 3664 The AES-XCBC-PRF-128 Algorithm for IKE January 2004 + + +5. References + +5.1. Normative References + + [AES-XCBC-MAC] Frankel, S. and H. Herbert, "The AES-XCBC-MAC-96 + Algorithm and Its Use With IPsec", RFC 3566, September + 2003. + +6. Author's Address + + Paul Hoffman + VPN Consortium + 127 Segre Place + Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA + + EMail: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Hoffman Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 3664 The AES-XCBC-PRF-128 Algorithm for IKE January 2004 + + +7. Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. + + This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to + others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it + or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published + and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any + kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are + included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this + document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing + the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other + Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of + developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for + copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be + followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than + English. + + The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be + revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees. + + This document and the information contained herein is provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING + TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING + BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION + HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the + Internet Society. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Hoffman Standards Track [Page 4] + |