summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc40.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc40.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc40.txt165
1 files changed, 165 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc40.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc40.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2fd024a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc40.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group E. Harslem
+Request for Comments: 40 J. Heafner
+ RAND
+ March 1970
+
+ More Comments on the Forthcoming Protocol
+
+We have recently discussed NWG/RFC Nos. 36 and 39 with Steve Crocker,
+UCLA. Steve has asked that we elaborate on the errors, queries, and
+HOST status that were mentioned in NWG/RFC #39.
+
+Please voice your opinions soon in order to affect the forthcoming
+protocol specifications.
+
+ERROR MESSAGES
+
+ <ERR> <Code> <Command length> <Command in error>
+
+<Code> is an eight-bit field that specifies the error type. The
+assigned codes are shown below. <Command length> is a 16-bit integer
+that indicates the length of the <Command in error> in bits. The
+<Command in error> is the spurious command.
+
+The ranges of <Code> are shown below in hexidecimal.
+
+ 00 Unspecified error types
+ 10-0F Resource errors
+ 10-1F Status errors
+ 20-2F Content errors
+ 30-3F Unused
+
+Specific values of <Code> are shown below with their meaning.
+
+ <Code> value Semantics
+
+ 00 Unspecified errors.
+ 01 Request for an invalid resource.
+ 02 Request for an exhausted resource, try later.
+ 03-0F Unused.
+ 10 Invalid <RSM>, i.e., link connected but unblocked.
+ 11 Invalid <SPD>.
+ 12 Invalid <ASG>, i.e., connected but no <RDY>
+ received.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ [Page 1]
+
+ <Code> value Semantics
+
+ 13 Message received on blocked link.
+ 14-1F Unused.
+ 20 Unknown command code.
+ 21 Message received on unconnected link.
+ 22 Invalid <RFC>.
+ 23 Invalid <CLS>.
+ 24 Invalid <RSM>, i.e., link not connected.
+ 25 Invalid <FND>.
+ 26 Invalid <END>.
+ 27 Invalid <RDY>.
+ 28 Invalid <ASG>, i.e., not connected.
+ 29-2F Unused.
+ 30-FF Unused.
+
+QUERIES
+
+ <QRY> <My Socket>
+or <RPY> <Your Socket> <Text>
+
+The <QRY> is the query indicated in NWG/RFC #39 and <RPY> is the reply.
+The format of <Text> is shown below; also refer to NWG/RFC #36, p. 3.
+
+<Text>::= <16 bit count of relevant connection table entries>
+ <relevant connection table entries>
+
+<relevant connection table entries>::=
+ <relevant connection table entries>
+ <a relevant connection table entry>
+ <a relevant connection table entry>
+
+<a relevant connection table entry>::= <local socket> <foreign socket>
+ <link> <connection state>
+ <flow state and buffer control>
+ <reconnection control state>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ [Page 2]
+
+HOST STATUS
+
+ <NOP>
+
+An NCP may be up, down, pending, etc. When an NCP changes its
+state to UP it should send a <NOP> to each remote NCP which
+indicates the NCP is available. The sending NCP can then
+construct a vector of HOST status from the RFNMs it receives. An
+NCP receiving a <NOP> can update the availability of the sending
+NCP in its HOST status vector.
+
+
+
+ [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+ [ into the online RFC archives by Richard Ames 6/97 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ [Page 3]
+