diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc547.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc547.txt | 171 | 
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc547.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc547.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..59e4c88 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc547.txt @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group                                          D. Walden +Request for Comments: 547                                        BBN-NET +NIC: 17793                                                13 August 1973 + + +             Change to the Very Distant Host Specification + +   Attached is a new version of figure F-4 for BBN Report 1822, +   Specification for the Interconnection of a Host and an IMP.  Also +   attached is replacement text for the paragraph beginning at the +   bottom of page F-7 and continuing through page F-8. + +   Please put this RFC with your copy of 1822 pending update of 1822. + +   DCW/ph + + +                   SPECIAL PACKET BIT ___ +                                         | +                                         | +      ___HELLO/I-HEARD-YOU BIT           |      ___ UNUSED __ +     |                                   |     |             | +     |                                   |     |             | +     V                                   V     V             V +    _______________________________________________________________ +   |   |   |                       |   |   |///////|   |   |///|   | +   |   |   |                       |   |   |///////|   |   |///|   | +   |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|///|///|___|___|///|___| +     ^   ^     PACKET WORD COUNT     ^               ^   ^       ^ +     |   |         ( 6 BITS )        |               |   |       | +     |   |                           |               |   |    CHANNEL +     |   |                           |               |   |    NUMBER +     |   |                           |               |   | +     |  PACKET                  HOST/IMP BIT         |  CHANNEL ZERO +     |  ODD/EVEN BIT                                 |  ACKNOWLEDGE BIT +     |                                               | +    LAST PACKET BIT                                CHANNEL ONE +                                                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BIT + +                          FIG. F-4   CONTROL WORD FORMAT + + + + + + + + + + + +Walden                                                          [Page 1] + +RFC 547      Change to the Very Distant Host Specification13 August 1973 + + +   The following algorithm is used to decide whether the circuit between +   an IMP and a very distant Host is dead or alive.  We first define +   what we call a special packet -- this is (logically) a one word +   packet consisting of only the control word and having the SPECIAL +   PACKET bit set to one.  All packets which are not special packets +   (i.e., which are regular data packets or null packets) have the +   SPECIAL PACKET bit set to zero.  In a special packet, none of the +   control word fields or bits have their usual meanings; consequently, +   a special packet cannot be used to acknowledge data packets or send +   data.  In a special packet, only one bit other than the SPECIAL +   PACKET bit has any meaning, the HELLO/I-HEARD-YOU bit. + +   Every r seconds both IMP and Host (independently) send a HELLO +   packet, a special packet with the HELLO/I-HEARD-YOU bit set to zero. +   When either IMP or Hosts receives a HELLO packet, it must promptly +   (with highest priority) send the other an I-HEARD-YOU packet, a +   special packet with the HELLO/I-HEAR-YOU bit set to one.  In other +   words, the I-HEARD-YOU packet is an acknowledgement of the periodic +   HELLO packet, and a I-HEARD-YOU packet must only be sent as +   acknowledgement for a HELLO packet.  If either IMP or Host sends more +   than t HELLO packets without receiving an I-HEARD-YOU packet in +   acknowledgement, the IMP or Host declares the line dead.  Once either +   IMP or Host declares the line dead, it must send or accept no packets +   (either special or regular) for 2*t*r* seconds to allow the other +   party also to declare the line dead.  After waiting 2*t*r* seconds, +   an attempt is made to bring the line alive.  This is done by sending +   HELLO packets (but no regular packets) every r seconds while noting +   received I-HEARD-YOU packets until k HELLO packets in a row are +   acknowledged with I-HEARD-YOU packets.  While doing this, received +   HELLO packets must be acknowledged with I-HEARD-YOU packets.  Once +   acknowledgement for k HELLO packets have been received in a row +   (i.e., one acknowledgement every r seconds for k intervals[1]), the +   line is declared alive, and regular packets again may be sent, +   received, and acknowledged along with the periodic (every r seconds) +   HELLO packets.  If a regular data packet is received while a party is +   trying to bring the line up (due perhaps to slight timing differences +   between the parties at the ends of the line), the data packet must +   not be acknowledged. + +   The odd/even bits, the used/unused bits, and the channel filling and +   emptying sequences must be initialized at start up[2] and +   reinitialized every time the line is declared dead.  If either the +   IMP or Host decides the line is dead, the same action is taken as the +   IMP or Host normally takes when the other's ready line is down.  The +   line being up causes the same action as is normally taken when the +   ready line is up.  The value of r is currently 1.25 seconds, the +   value of t is currently 4, and the value of k is currently also 4. + + + + +Walden                                                          [Page 2] + +RFC 547      Change to the Very Distant Host Specification13 August 1973 + + +   It is likely that the values of r, t, and k will be adjusted in the +   future; very distant Host programmers are advised to make it easy to +   change these parameters. + +Endnotes + +   [1] In particular, the IMP implementation requires the receipt of an +   acknowledgement within r seconds of the transmission of a HELLO +   packet in order to consider that the HELLO packet was successfully +   acknowledged. + +   [2] At start-up, the line must be assumed to be dead and the +   procedure of waiting 2*t*r* seconds before sending HELLO packets, +   etc. must be used to bring the line alive initially. + + +         [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] +          [ into the online RFC archives by Jeff McClellan 1/98 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Walden                                                          [Page 3] +  |