diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc577.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc577.txt | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc577.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc577.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8646723 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc577.txt @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group D. Crocker +Request for Comments: 577 UCLA-NMC +NIC: 19356 October 1973 +References: RFC 524, 539, 555 + + + Mail Priority + + In RFC 539 (NIC--17644,3d:gy) Postel and I suggested that mail + senders be allowed to assign a degree of priority to their mail. + White (RFC 555--17993,6c:gy) objected to defining shades of urgency, + without having their effects upon the Mail Protocol server also + defined. + + If priority levels were to be assigned by automata, I would agree + with Jim. Unfortunately, the human sender of the mail will usually + be the one to assign the priority, and humans will not be consistent + in that assignment. + + Also unfortunately, the concept of urgency is an integral part of + communication. If it weren't, we could ignore its inclusion into the + MP. + + Since distinctions in urgency are useful (necessary?) and since + humans will be the ones assigning specific degrees of urgency + (thereby making it impossible for server processes to automatically + do the "right thing" in response), we suggested only including the + INFORMATION as part of the protocol. Let the human and server- + process receivers decide between themselves how the server-process + should deal with that information. + + Now that I have argued all that, let me suggest interpretations for + urgency values. This is so that programmers can have automata- + generated mail (e.g., notification of the status of previously sent + mail) carry reasonable urgency values: + + 10 Phone in the middle of the night, if necessary. + 9 + 8 Deliver to user's terminal NOW. + 7 + 6 Deliver to user's terminal only if user is at "exec" + level. + 5 + 4 Deliver immediately after sign-on or before sign-off. + 3 + 2 Deliver into standard mailbox. + 1 + 0 Junk Mail + + + +Crocker [Page 1] + +RFC 577 Mail Priority October 1973 + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Martin Lyngvig 7/99 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Crocker [Page 2] + |