diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc593.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc593.txt | 59 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc593.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc593.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1967e8d --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc593.txt @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group Alex McKenzie +Request for Comments: 593 BBN + Jon Postel + MITRE + + + Telnet and FTP Implementation Schedule Change + +Telnet and FTP Implementation Schedule Change + + We have been contacted by several Telnet implementers and concerned + users regarding the scheduled changeover from old to new Telnet. + There is a good deal of concern about accomplishing a coordinated + changeover especially in light of the potential incompatibilities + (RFC 559, NIC18482). Therefore the changeover is reformulated as + follows. + + New Telnet implementations are to be ready 1 Jan 74 (as before), but + are to use ICP socket 23 (decimal). That is the server Telnet will + listen on socket 23, and user Telnet programs will connect to socket + 23. It will also be useful for the user program to let the user + optionally select the server socket, as many user Telnet programs + currently do. It will also be useful for implementers to consider a + server Telnet program capable of dealing with both protocols as MIT- + DMCG has done (RFC 559). This will provide an opportunity for + testing and debugging the new programs in a way that does not + interfere with normal use. + + During January we will survey the technical liaisons to determine the + status of the Telnet implementations. As soon as we determine that + the Telnet implementations have reached a point where the changeover + can be made without disruption of user services the technical + liaisons will be notified. + + In light of this change in the Telnet implementation schedule, the + FTP schedule is also modified. New FTP implementations are to be + ready by 1 Feb 74 (as before), but will continue to use ICP socket 21 + (decimal) until we can determine that a changeover is appropriate. + +References + + Telnet Protocol NIC 18639 + + File Transfer Protocol NIC 17759 + + [This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [into the online RFC archives by Mirsad Todorovac 5/98 ] + + + + +McKenzie & Postel [Page 1] + |