1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
|
Network Working Group S. Yeh
Request for Comments: 1204 D. Lee
Netix Communications, Inc.
February 1991
Message Posting Protocol (MPP)
Status of this Memo
This memo describes a protocol for posting messages from workstations
(e.g., PCs) to a mail service host. This RFC specifies an
Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. Discussion and
suggestions for improvement are requested. Please refer to the
current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
1. INTRODUCTION
Operating systems for personal computers do not provide a mechanism
for user authentication. However, such a mechanism is crucial for
electronic mail system since authenticating message sender's identity
is important in preventing mail forgery. Hence, adding personal
computers to an electronic mail network requires an agent (message
posting server) to authenticate sender's identity and then submit
mail to the message delivery system (e.g., Sendmail, MMDF) on behalf
of the sender at a PC. The Netix Message Posting Protocol is
developed to be the interface between the message posting server and
the PC (client). The protocol is designed to use TCP and is based on
the command and reply structures defined for Simple Mail Transfer
Protocol (RFC 821) and File Transfer Protocol (RFC 959).
2. SPECIFICATIONS
2.1. Command List
USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
DATA <CRLF>
NOOP <CRLF>
QUIT <CRLF>
2.2. Reply List
220 Message Posting Service Ready.
221 Closing Connection.
250 Command OK.
Yeh & Lee [Page 1]
^L
RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
451 Local error encountered.
500 Command unrecognized.
501 Argument syntax error.
503 Illegal command sequence.
530 Authentication Failure.
550 Error.
2.3. Command and Reply Descriptions
USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
The USER command informs the message posting server about the
username of the user trying to submit mail to the network. The
required argument for the USER command is a string specifying
the message sender's username.
The USER command can only be used under three conditions:
- when the session with the message posting server has just
started;
- right after a message text (terminated by the "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
sequence) has been successfully submitted to the message
posting server;
- right after a USER command that gets the reply code 501.
List of possible reply codes for the USER command:
- 250 The username of the message sender has been accepted.
- 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
server.
- 501 Syntax error detected in the username argument.
- 503 The USER command has been used under an inappropriate
condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
It is recommended that the message posting server should return
250 even if the username is not recognized by the message
posting server, as long as the username is syntactically
correct. This is an attempt to prevent the message posting
server from releasing too much information about the user
database. Client should not be able to test the existence of a
certain username.
Yeh & Lee [Page 2]
^L
RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
The PASS command is used to inform the message posting server
about the password associated with the username previously
specified. The required argument for the PASS command is a
string specifying the message sender's password.
The PASS command can only be used under two conditions:
- right after a USER command that gets the reply code 250;
- right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 501.
List of possible reply codes for the PASS command:
- 250 The password has been accepted and verified to be
correctly associated with the username previously
specified.
- 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
server.
- 501 Syntax error detected in the password argument.
- 503 The PASS command has been used under an inappropriate
condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
- 530 The password provided is not the one associated with the
username previously specified.
DATA <CRLF>
The DATA command is used to inform the message posting server
to get ready to accept a mail message text. No argument is
expected. (This command has the same meaning as the DATA
command defined in RFC 821.)
The DATA command can only be used under two conditions:
- right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 250;
- right after a mail message text has been successfully
accepted from the client.
List of possible reply codes for the DATA command:
- 354 The message posting server is ready to accept the mail
message text.
Yeh & Lee [Page 3]
^L
RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
- 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
server.
- 503 The DATA command has been used under an inappropriate
condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
Upon receiving the reply code 354 for the DATA command, the
client should submit the mail message text to message posting
server and terminate the text by the sequence "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
as defined in RFC 821. If the message text includes the
"<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, then the sequence is replaced by the
"<CRLF>..<CRLF>" sequence as defined in RFC 821. The extra "."
token will not be included in the final copy of the submitted
message.
Upon receiving the mail message text terminated by the
"<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, list of possible reply codes is:
- 250 The mail message text has been successfully queued for
delivery.
- 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
server and the mail message text has not been queued.
NOOP <CRLF>
The NOOP command does not cause any action to be performed by
the message posting server. Instead, it tests the status of
the message posting server. No argument is expected.
The NOOP command cannot be used under one condition:
- right after a DATA command that gets the reply code 354
(i.e., when the message posting server is expecting the client
to submit the mail message text).
List of possible reply codes for the NOOP command:
- 250 The message posting server has not encountered any
internal error.
- 451 Internal error has occurred in the message posting
server during the current session.
QUIT <CRLF>
The QUIT command is used to terminate the session with the
message posting server. No argument is expected.
Yeh & Lee [Page 4]
^L
RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
The QUIT command can be used under any condition. The message
posting server should always return the reply code 221 for the
QUIT command.
3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MESSAGE POSTING SERVER
There are several issues to be considered when implementing the
message posting server:
- secured environment
- port number assignment
- handling of idle client
- local/remote password database
- message queuing
- handling of message delivery failure
3.1 Secured Environment
The message posting server is responsible for authenticating message
senders and submitting mail to the message delivery system. Hence,
it should be running in a secured environment, such as running on a
system (UNIX, VMS, MS-DOS) with well restricted physical and network
access.
3.2 Port Number Assignment
Port 218 is assigned for the Netix Message Posting Protocol.
3.3 Handling of Idle Client
The message posting server should terminate a session if the client
has been idle for too long, to release the resource allocated for the
session.
3.4 Local/Remote Password Database
To take advantage of existing password databases, such as the passwd
file in UNIX, the message posting server can use FTP and POP3 to
perform the username and password checking with the appropriate
server.
For network that does not have any password database, the message
posting server should let the system administrator specify a local
password file on the host that the message posting server is running.
Yeh & Lee [Page 5]
^L
RFC 1204 MPP February 1991
3.5 Message Queuing
The message posting server should attempt to submit accepted messages
to the message delivery system as soon as possible.
3.6 Handling of Message Delivery Failure
Failure in delivering messages should be handled by the message
delivery system and the message posting server should not interfere.
4. REFERENCES
[1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 821,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
[2] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 959,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1985.
Security Considerations
Security issues are discussed in section 3.1.
Authors' Addresses
Shannon Yeh
Netix Communications, Inc.
15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
Irvine, CA 92718
Phone: (714) 727-9335
Email: yeh@netix.com
David Lee
Netix Communications, Inc.
15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
Irvine, CA 92718
Phone: (714) 727-9335
EMail: dlee@netix.com
Yeh & Lee [Page 6]
^L
|
