blob: 9ac7315722ae8bd4113ceff1077f57fa590f2b47 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Network Working Group J. Postel
Request for Comments: 128 UCLA
Category: C.2, D. Computer Science
NIC #5844 21 April 71
Obsoletes: none
Updates: none
BYTES
It is somewhat unclear what to do with the Byte size parameter now
allowed by the 2nd level protocol. I can conceive of an
implementation in which the 3rd level programs never see this
parameter. Crocker implies in RFC 123 that control of this parameter
is given to the 3rd level programs and that both sender and receiver
may specify values of the byte size to the NCP.
There are at least two interpretations if the sender and receiver
specify different byte sizes.
I. The first is that the connection is illegal.
II. The second is that the NCP must parse the data stream on receipt
from the network and into a buffer according to be byte size of
the sender, and subsequently parse the data stream on transfer
from the buffer to the receiver. In this second case there are
two sub cases.
A. One is to consider bits as the basic unit.
For example, if the sender specified byte size = 5 and the
receiver specified byte size = 3 then
Receiver NCP Sender
-+---+---+---+---+ +--------+ +-----+-----+---
|000|001|010|011| <--- | Buffer | <--- |00000|10100|11
-+---+---+---+---+ +--------+ +-----+-----+---
B. The other is to consider bytes as the significant unit and pad
(on the right or left?) or truncate to make things fit, or
other transformation.
At UCLA-Computer Science we are contemplating allowing sender and
receiver to specify different byte sizes and consider bits as the
basic unit (Case II.A.). This does not rule out our considering the
second subcase (Case II.B.). We may allow 3rd level programs to
specify a library or user supplied routine to perform the
Postel [Page 1]
^L
RFC 128 Bytes April 1971
transformation between sender and receiver bytes. Perhaps these
transformation routines would be written in the Data Reconfiguration
Language.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Duncan de Waal 03/98 ]
Postel [Page 2]
^L
|
