1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
|
Network Working Group E. Gerich
Request for Comments: 1814 Merit Network Inc.
Category: Informational June 1995
Unique Addresses are Good
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The IAB suggests that while RFC 1597 establishes reserved IP address
space for the use of private networks which are isolated and will
remain isolated from the Internet, any enterprise which anticipates
external connectivity to the Internet should apply for a globally
unique address from an Internet registry or service provider.
Introduction
With the advent of RFC 1466 and RFC 1597 the criteria for the
allocation of unique IP numbers and the reservation of unique IP
numbers have been defined. The IAB and the IANA wish to offer
guidance to the Internet registries as to the application of these
two documents. The author submits this document as an informational
RFC on behalf of the Internet Architecture Board and the IANA.
Guidance to Internet Registries
RFC 1466 lists the criteria to which Internet registries should
conform. One of the criteria is that the Internet registry is
committed to allocate IP numbers according to the guidelines
established by the IANA and the IR. Those guidelines (for Classes A,
B, and C addresses) are documented in RFC 1466.
Internet Registries have agreed to comply with the guidelines
established by RFC 1466 and therefore, if an organization meets the
size requirement for the requested address(es) and submits an
engineering plan, the organization has fulfilled the necessary
requirements. The Internet Registry will make the allocation based
on the established criteria.
Gerich Informational [Page 1]
^L
RFC 1814 Unique Addresses are Good June 1995
The preconditions defined in RFC 1466 are limited to number of hosts
and subnets as well as an engineering plan. The existence of private
address space (RFC 1597) shall not prevent an enterprise from
obtaining public address space according to the allocation criteria
(currently, RFC 1466).
An enterprise may be required by a Internet registry to submit an
engineering plan documenting a realistic deployment schedule and
reasonable attention to conservation of address space to support the
size of the enterprise's request for globally unique IP addresses.
It is perfectly appropriate for an Internet registry to inform an
organization of the provisions of RFC 1597. Any organization
considering the use of private network numbers should carefully
consider the potential advantages and possible problems as discussed
in RFCs 1597 and 1627.
RFC 1597 establishes reserved IP address space for the use of private
networks which are isolated and will remain isolated from the
Internet. Thus RFC 1597 documents a way that private enterprises may
assure that their networks will remain segregated from the Internet.
The addresses designated in RFC 1597 should not be routed by the
Internet.
Any enterprise with a significantly large number of hosts which might
require external connectivity to the Internet at the IP layer should
apply for a block of globally unique addresses from an Internet
registry. Enterprises with a small to medium number of hosts that
require external connectivity to the Internet at the IP layer should
expect to use globally unique addresses for these hosts, assigned to
them by their current Internet service provider from its own assigned
addresses, if it has such addresses to distribute.
If an enterprise with a small to medium number of hosts desires
unique IP addresses, and is unable to obtain them under reasonable
conditions from a service provider, or has no service provider, the
Internet registries are recommended to assign such addresses without
conditions with respect to service provider selection. The
registries should make clear to the enterprise that when the
enterprise decides to connect to the Internet, the assigned addresses
are no guarantee of Internet-wide IP connectivity. In fact, some
service providers may require renumbering as a condition of
connectivity.
Any organization which anticipates having external connectivity is
encouraged to apply for a globally unique IP address. Globally
unique addresses are necessary to differentiate between destinations
on the Internet. One must understand, however, that the globally
Gerich Informational [Page 2]
^L
RFC 1814 Unique Addresses are Good June 1995
unique address by itself does not necessarily guarantee global
connectivity. Individual network service providers may place
restrictions on what addresses they will or will not route based on
operational limitations.
References
[1] Gerich, E., "Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space", RFC
1466, Merit Network Inc., May 1993.
[2] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, B., Karrenberg, D., and G. de Groot,
"Address Allocation for Private Internets", RFC 1597, T.J. Watson
Research Center, IBM Corp., Chrysler Corp., RIPE NCC, RIPE NCC,
March 1994.
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Author's Address
Elise Gerich
Merit Network Inc.
4251 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: +1 313 764 9430
Fax: +1 313 747 3745
EMail: epg@merit.edu
Gerich Informational [Page 3]
^L
|
