summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc3381.txt
blob: d7fd60f81df11fc5ac962596489b476c6561fdd5 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
Network Working Group                                        T. Hastings
Request for Comments: 3381                             Xerox Corporation
Updates: 2910                                                   H. Lewis
Category: Standards Track                           IBM Printing Company
                                                              R. Bergman
                                          Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions
                                                          September 2002


                   Internet Printing Protocol (IPP):
                        Job Progress Attributes

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This document defines four new Job Description attributes for
   monitoring job progress to be registered as OPTIONAL extensions to
   the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1).  These
   attributes are drawn from the PWG Job Monitoring MIB.  This document
   also defines a new "sheet-collate" Job Template attribute to control
   sheet collation and to help with the interpretation of the job
   progress attributes.


















Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 1]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


Table of Contents

   1 Introduction.....................................................2
   2 Terminology......................................................2
   2.1 Conformance Terminology........................................4
   2.2 Other terminology..............................................4
   3 Job Template attributes..........................................4
   3.1 sheet-collate (type2 keyword)..................................4
   4 IPP Job Description attributes for monitoring Job Progress.......6
   4.1 job-collation-type (type2 enum)................................9
   4.2 sheet-completed-copy-number (integer(0:MAX))..................11
   4.3 sheet-completed-document-number (integer(0:MAX))..............11
   4.4 impressions-completed-current-copy (integer(0:MAX))...........11
   5 Conformance Requirements........................................11
   6 IANA Considerations.............................................12
   6.1 Attributes....................................................
   6.2 Keyword Attribute Values......................................
   6.3 Enum Attribute Values.........................................
   7 Internationalization Considerations.............................12
   8 Security Considerations.........................................12
   9 References......................................................12
   10 Description of the Base IPP Documents..........................13
   11 Authors' Addresses.............................................15
   12 Full Copyright Statement.......................................16

1 Introduction

   This document defines four new Job Description attributes for
   monitoring job progress to be registered as OPTIONAL extensions to
   IPP/1.0 [RFC2566] and IPP/1.1 [RFC2911].  These attributes are drawn
   from the PWG Job Monitoring MIB [RFC2707].  See section 10 for a
   description of the base IPP documents.  The new Job Description
   attributes are:

      "job-collation-type" (type2 enum)
      "sheet-completed-copy-number" (integer(0:MAX))
      "sheet-completed-document-number" (integer(0:MAX))
      "impressions-completed-current-copy" (integer(0:MAX))

   This document also defines a new "sheet-collate" Job Template
   attribute to control sheet collation and to help with the
   interpretation of the job progress attributes.  These new attributes
   may also be used by themselves in combination with the IPP/1.1 "job-
   impressions-completed" attribute, as useful job progress monitoring
   attributes and/or may be passed in an IPP Notification (see [ipp-
   ntfy]).





Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 2]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


2 Terminology

   This section defines terminology used throughout this document.

2.1 Conformance Terminology

   Capitalized terms, such as MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD
   NOT, MAY, NEED NOT, and OPTIONAL, have special meaning relating to
   conformance, as defined in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] and [RFC2911] section
   12.1.  If an implementation supports the extension defined in this
   document, then these terms apply; otherwise, they do not.  These
   terms define conformance to this document only; they do not affect
   conformance to other documents, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

2.2 Other terminology

   This document uses terms such as Job object (or Job), IPP Printer
   object (or Printer), "operation", "attribute", "keyword", "support",
   and "impression".  These terms have special meaning and are defined
   in the model terminology [RFC2911], section 12.2.

3 Job Template attributes

3.1 sheet-collate (type2 keyword)

   +===================+======================+=====================+
   | Job Attribute     |Printer: Default Value|  Printer: Supported |
   |                   |   Attribute          |   Values Attribute  |
   +===================+======================+=====================+
   | sheet-collate     | sheet-collate-default| sheet-collate-      |
   | (type2 keyword)   | (type2 keyword)      |  supported (1setOf  |
   |                   |                      |      type2 keyword) |
   +-------------------+----------------------+---------------------+

   This attribute specifies whether or not the media sheets of each copy
   of each printed document in a job are to be in sequence, when
   multiple copies of the document are specified by the 'copies'
   attribute.

   Standard keyword values are:

      'uncollated':  each print-stream sheet is printed a number of
         times in succession equal to the value of the 'copies'
         attribute, followed by the next print-stream sheet.

      'collated':  each copy of each document is printed with the
         print-stream sheets in sequence, followed by the next document
         copy.



Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 3]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   For example, suppose a document produces two media sheets as output,
   and "copies" is equal to '6'.  For the 'uncollated' case, six copies
   of the first media sheet are printed, followed by six copies of the
   second media sheet.  For the 'collated' case, one copy of each of the
   six sheets is printed, followed by another copy of each of the six
   media sheets.

   Whether the effect of sheet collation is achieved by placing copies
   of a document in multiple output bins, or in the same output bin with
   implementation defined document separation, is implementation
   dependent.  Also whether it is achieved by making multiple passes
   over the job or by using an output sorter, is implementation
   dependent.

   Note: IPP/1.0 [RFC2566] and IPP/1.1 [RFC2911] are silent on whether
   or not sheets within documents are collated.  The "sheet-collate-
   supported" Printer attribute permits a Printer object to indicate
   whether or not it collates sheets with each document and whether it
   allows the client to control sheet collation.  An implementation is
   able to indicate that it supports uncollated sheets, collated sheets,
   or both, using the 'uncollated', 'collated', or both 'uncollated' and
   'collated' values, respectively.

   This attribute is affected by "multiple-document-handling".  The
   "multiple-document-handling" attribute describes the collation of
   documents, and the "sheet-collate" attribute describes the semantics
   of collating individual pages within a document.  To better explain
   the interaction between these two attributes, the term "set" is
   introduced.  A "set" is a logical boundary between the delivered
   media sheets of a printed job.  For example, in the case of a ten
   page single document with collated pages and a request for 50 copies,
   each of the 50 printed copies of the document constitutes a "set".
   In the above example if the pages were uncollated, then 50 copies of
   each of the individual pages within the document would represent each
   "set".
















Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 4]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   The following table describes the interaction of "sheet-collate" with
   multiple document handling.

      "sheet-        "multiple-       Semantics
      collate"       document-
                     handling"

      'collated'     'single-         Each copy of the concatenated
                     document'        documents, with their pages in
                                      sequence, represents a "set".

      'collated'     'single-         Each copy of the concatenated
                     document-new-    documents, with their pages in
                     sheet'           sequence, represents a "set".

      'collated'     'separate-       Each copy of each separate
                     documents-       document, with its pages in
                     collated-        sequence, represents a "set".
                     copies'

      'collated'     'separate-       Each copy of each separate
                     documents-       document, with its pages in
                     uncollated-      sequence, represents a "set".
                     copies

      'uncollated'   'single-         Each media sheet of the document
                     document'        is printed a number of times equal
                                      to the "copies" attribute; which
                                      constitutes a "set".

      'uncollated'   'single-         Each media sheet of the
                     document-new-    concatenated documents is printed
                     sheet'           a number of times equal to the
                                      "copies" attribute; which
                                      constitutes a "set".

      'uncollated'   'separate-       This is a degenerate case, and the
                     documents-       printer object MUST reject the job
                     collated-        and return the status, "client-
                     copies'          error-conflicting-attributes".

      'uncollated'   'separate-       This is a degenerate case, and the
                     documents-       printer object MUST reject the job
                     uncollated-      and return the status "client-
                     copies           error-conflicting-attributes".






Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 5]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


      From the above table it is obvious that the implicit value of the
      "sheet-collate" attribute in a printer that does not support the
      "sheet-collate" attribute, is 'collated.'  The semantics of
      "multiple-document-handling" are otherwise nonsensical in the case
      of separate documents.

4 IPP Job Description attributes for monitoring Job Progress

   The following IPP Job Description attributes are proposed to be added
   to IPP through the type2 registration procedures.  They are useful
   for monitoring the progress of a job.  They are also used as
   attributes in the notification content in a notification report
   [ipp-ntfy].

   There are a number of Job Description attributes for monitoring the
   progress of a job.  These objects and attributes count the number of
   K octets, impressions, sheets, and pages requested or completed.  For
   impressions and sheets, "completed" means stacked, unless the
   implementation is unable to detect when each sheet is stacked, in
   which case, stacked is approximated when the processing of each sheet
   is completed.  There are objects and attributes for the overall job
   and for the current copy of the document currently being stacked.
   For the latter, the rate at which the various objects and attributes
   count, depends on the sheet and document collation of the job.

   Consider the following four Job Description attributes that are used
   to monitor the progress of a job's impressions:

      1. "job-impressions-completed" - counts the total number of
         impressions stacked for the job (see [RFC2911] section
         4.3.18.2).

      2. "impressions-completed-current-copy" - counts the number of
         impressions stacked for the current document copy.

      3. "sheet-completed-copy-number" - identifies the number of the
         copy for the current document being stacked, where the first
         copy is 1.

      4. "sheet-completed-document-number" - identifies the current
         document within the job that is being stacked, where the first
         document in a job is 1.  NOTE: this attribute SHOULD NOT be
         implemented for implementations that only support one document
         per job.







Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 6]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   For each of the three types of job collation, a job with three copies
   of two documents (1, 2), where each document consists of 3
   impressions, the four variables have the following values, as each
   sheet is stacked for one-sided printing:

   "job-collation-type" = 'uncollated-sheets(3)'

   "job-            "impressions-     "sheet-         "sheet-
   impressions-     completed-        completed-      completed-
   completed"       current-copy"     copy-number"    document-
                                                      number"

        0                0                0               0
        1                1                1               1
        2                1                2               1
        3                1                3               1
        4                2                1               1
        5                2                2               1
        6                2                3               1
        7                3                1               1
        8                3                2               1
        9                3                3               1
       10                1                1               2
       11                1                2               2
       12                1                3               2
       13                2                1               2
       14                2                2               2
       15                2                3               2
       16                3                1               2
       17                3                2               2
       18                3                3               2




















Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 7]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   "job-collation-type" = 'collated-documents(4)'

   "job-            "impressions-     "sheet-         "sheet-
   impressions-     completed-        completed-      completed-
   completed"       current-copy"     copy-           document-
                                      number"         number"

        0                0                0               0
        1                1                1               1
        2                2                1               1
        3                3                1               1
        4                1                1               2
        5                2                1               2
        6                3                1               2
        7                1                2               1
        8                2                2               1
        9                3                2               1
       10                1                2               2
       11                2                2               2
       12                3                2               2
       13                1                3               1
       14                2                3               1
       15                3                3               1
       16                1                3               2
       17                2                3               2
       18                3                3               2

























Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 8]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   "job-collation-type" = 'uncollated-documents(5)'

   "job-            "impressions-     "sheet-         "sheet-
   impressions-     completed-        completed-      completed-
   completed"       current-copy"     copy-t          document-
                                      number"         number"

        0                0                0               0
        1                1                1               1
        2                2                1               1
        3                3                1               1
        4                1                2               1
        5                2                2               1
        6                3                2               1
        7                1                3               1
        8                2                3               1
        9                3                3               1
       10                1                1               2
       11                2                1               2
       12                3                1               2
       13                1                2               2
       14                2                2               2
       15                3                2               2
       16                1                3               2
       17                2                3               2
       18                3                3               2

4.1 job-collation-type (type2 enum)

   Job Collation includes sheet collation and document collation.  Sheet
   collation is defined to be the ordering of sheets within a document
   copy.  Document collation is defined to be the ordering of document
   copies within a multi-document job.  The value of the "job-
   collation-type" is affected by the value of the "sheet-collate" Job
   Template attribute (see section 3.1), if supplied and supported.

   The Standard enum values are:

      '1' 'other':  not one of the defined values

      '2' 'unknown':  the collation type is unknown

      '3' 'uncollated-sheets':  No collation of the sheets within each
                    document copy, i.e., each sheet of a document that
                    is to produce multiple copies, is replicated before
                    the next sheet in the document is processed and
                    stacked.  If the device has an output bin collator,
                    the 'uncollated-sheets(3)' value may actually



Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                     [Page 9]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


                    produce collated sheets as far as the user is
                    concerned (in the output bins).  However, when the
                    job collation is the 'uncollated-sheets(3)' value,
                    job progress is indistinguishable from a monitoring
                    application between a device that has an output bin
                    collator and one that does not.

      '4' 'collated-documents':  Collation of the sheets within each
                    document copy is performed within the printing
                    device by making multiple passes over, either the
                    source or an intermediate representation of the
                    document.  In addition, when there are multiple
                    documents per job, the i'th copy of each document is
                    stacked before the j'th copy of each document, i.e.,
                    the documents are collated within each job copy.
                    For example, if a job is submitted with documents, A
                    and B, the job is made available to the end user as:
                    A, B, A, B, ....  The 'collated-documents(4)' value
                    corresponds to the IPP [RFC2911] 'separate-
                    documents-collated-copies' keyword value of the
                    "multiple-document-handling" attribute.

                    If the job's "copies" attribute is '1' (or not
                    supplied), then the "job-collation-type" attribute
                    is defined to be '4'.

      '5' 'uncollated-documents':  Collation of the sheets within each
                    document copy is performed within the printing
                    device by making multiple passes over either the
                    source or an intermediate representation of the
                    document.  In addition, when there are multiple
                    documents per job, all copies of the first document
                    in the job are stacked before any copied of the next
                    document in the job, i.e., the documents are
                    uncollated within the job.  For example, if a job is
                    submitted with documents, A and B, the job is made
                    available to the end user as:  A, A, ..., B, B, ....
                    The 'uncollated-documents(5)' value corresponds to
                    the IPP [RFC2911] 'separate-documents-uncollated-
                    copies' keyword value of the "multiple-document-
                    handling" attribute.










Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 10]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


4.2 sheet-completed-copy-number (integer(0:MAX))

   The number of the copy being stacked for the current document.  This
   number starts at 0, is set to 1 when the first sheet of the first
   copy for each document is being stacked and is equal to n where n is
   the nth sheet stacked in the current document copy.  If the value is
   unknown, the Printer MUST return the 'unknown' out-of-band value (see
   [RFC2911] section 4.1), rather than the -2 value used in some MIBs
   [RFC2707].

4.3 sheet-completed-document-number (integer(0:MAX))

   The ordinal number of the document in the job that is currently being
   stacked.  This number starts at 0, increments to 1 when the first
   sheet of the first document in the job is being stacked, and is equal
   to n where n is the nth document in the job, starting with 1. If the
   value is unknown, the Printer MUST return the 'unknown' out-of-band
   value (see [RFC2911] section 4.1), rather than the -2 value used in
   some MIBs [RFC2707].

   Implementations that only support one document job SHOULD NOT
   implement this attribute.

4.4 impressions-completed-current-copy (integer(0:MAX))

   The number of impressions completed by the device for the current
   copy of the current document so far.  For printing, the impressions
   completed includes interpreting, marking, and stacking the output.
   For other types of job services, the number of impressions completed
   includes the number of impressions processed.  If the value is
   unknown, the Printer MUST return the 'unknown' out-of-band value (see
   [RFC2911] section 4.1), rather than the -2 value used in some MIBs
   [RFC2707].

   This value MUST be reset to 0 for each document in the job and for
   each document copy.

5 Conformance Requirements

   This section summarizes the Conformance Requirements detailed in the
   definitions in this document.  In general each of the attributes
   defined in this document are OPTIONAL for a client and/or a Printer
   to support, so that client and Printer implementers MAY implement any
   combination of these attributes.







Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 11]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


6 IANA Considerations

   This section contains registration information for IANA to add to the
   IPP Registry according to the procedures defined in RFC 2911
   [RFC2911], section 6.  The resulting registrations will be published
   in the http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipp-registrations registry.

6.1 Attributes

   Job Template attributes:                        Ref.      Section:
   sheet-collate (type2 keyword)                   RFC 3381       3.1
   sheet-default (type2 keyword)                   RFC 3381       3.1
   sheet-supported (1setOf type2 keyword)          RFC 3381       3.1

   Job Description attributes:                     Ref.      Section:
   job-collation-type (type2 enum)                 RFC 3381       4.1
   sheet-completed-copy-number (integer(0:MAX))    RFC 3381       4.2
   sheet-completed-document-number (integer(0:MAX))RFC 3381       4.3
   impressions-completed-current-copy (integer(0:MAX))
                                                   RFC 3381       4.4
6.2 Keyword Attribute Values

   The following table provides registration information for all of the
   attributes defined in this document that have keyword values.  These
   keywords are to be registered according to the procedures defined in
   RFC 2911 [RFC2911] section 6.1.

   sheet-collate (type2 keyword)                   RFC 3381       3.1
     'uncollated'                                  RFC 3381       3.1
     'collated'                                    RFC 3381       3.1
   sheet-collate-default (type2 keyword)           RFC 3381       3.1
     See "sheet-collate" attribute
   sheet-collate-supported (1setOf type2 keyword)  RFC 3381       3.1
     See "sheet-collate" attribute

6.3 Enum Attribute Values

   The following table provides registration information for all of the
   attributes defined in this document that have enum values.  These
   enums are to be registered according to the procedures defined in RFC
   2911 [RFC2911] section 6.1.

   job-collation-type (type2 enum)                 RFC 3381       4.1
     '1'   'other'                                 RFC 3381       4.1
     '2'   'unknown'                               RFC 3381       4.1
     '3'   'uncollated-sheets'                     RFC 3381       4.1
     '4'   'collated-documents'                    RFC 3381       4.1
     '5'   'uncollated-documents'                  RFC 3381       4.1



Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 12]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


7 Internationalization Considerations

   The IPP extensions defined in this document require the same
   internationalization considerations as any of the Job Template and
   Job Description attributes defined in IPP/1.1 [RFC2911].

8 Security Considerations

   The IPP extensions defined in this document require the same security
   considerations as any of the Job Template attributes and Job
   Description attributes defined in IPP/1.1 [RFC2911].

9 References

9.1 Normative References

   [RFC2910]  Herriot, R., Butler, S., Moore, P. and R. Turner,
              "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport",
              RFC 2910, September 2000.

   [RFC2911]  Hastings, T., Herriot, R., deBry, R., Isaacson, S. and P.
              Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and
              Semantics", RFC 2911, September 2000.

9.2 Informative References

   [RFC2565]  Herriot, R., Butler, S., Moore, P. and R. Turner,
              "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport",
              RFC 2565, April 1999.

   [RFC2566]  deBry, R., Hastings, T., Herriot, R., Isaacson, S. and P.
              Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and
              Semantics", RFC 2566, April 1999.

   [RFC2567]  Wright, F.D., "Design Goals for an Internet Printing
              Protocol", RFC 2567, April 1999.

   [RFC2568]  Zilles, S., "Rationale for the Structure and Model and
              Protocol for the Internet Printing Protocol", RFC 2568,
              April 1999.

   [RFC2569]  Herriot, R., Hastings, T., Jacobs, N. and J. Martin,
              "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols", RFC 2569, April
              1999.

   [RFC2707]  Bergman, R., Hastings, T., Isaacson, S. and H. Lewis, "PWG
              Job Monitoring MIB - V1", RFC 2707,  November 1999.




Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 13]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   [RFC3196]  Hastings, T., Manros, C., Zehler, P., Kugler, C. and H.
              Holst, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementor's
              Guide", RFC 3196, November 2001.

   [ipp-ntfy] Herriot, R., Hastings, T., et. al., "Internet Printing
              Protocol (IPP): Event Notification and Subscriptions",
              Work in Progress.

10 Description of the Base IPP Documents

   The base set of IPP documents includes:

      Design Goals for an Internet Printing Protocol [RFC2567]
      Rationale for the Structure and Model and Protocol for the
      Internet Printing Protocol [RFC2568]
      Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics [RFC2911]
      Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport [RFC2910]
      Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementer's Guide [RFC3196]
      Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols [RFC2569]

   The "Design Goals for an Internet Printing Protocol" document takes a
   broad look at distributed printing functionality, and enumerates
   real-life scenarios that help to clarify the features that need to be
   included in a printing protocol for the Internet.  It identifies
   requirements for three types of users: end users, operators, and
   administrators.  It calls out a subset of end user requirements that
   are satisfied in IPP/1.0 [RFC2566, RFC2565].  A few OPTIONAL operator
   operations have been added to IPP/1.1 [RFC2911, RFC2910].

   The "Rationale for the Structure and Model and Protocol for the
   Internet Printing Protocol" document describes IPP from a high level
   view, defines a roadmap for the various documents that form the suite
   of IPP specification documents, and gives background and rationale
   for the IETF IPP working group's major decisions.

   The "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics" document
   describes a simplified model with abstract objects, their attributes,
   and their operations.  The model introduces a Printer and a Job.  The
   Job supports multiple documents per Job.  The model document also
   addresses how security, internationalization, and directory issues
   are addressed.

   The "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport" document
   is a formal mapping of the abstract operations and attributes defined
   in the model document onto HTTP/1.1 [RFC2616].  It also defines the
   encoding rules for a new Internet MIME media type called
   "application/ipp".  This document also defines the rules for
   transporting over HTTP a message body whose Content-Type is



Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 14]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


   "application/ipp".  This document defines the 'ipp' scheme for
   identifying IPP printers and jobs.

   The "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementer's Guide" document
   gives insight and advice to implementers of IPP clients and IPP
   objects.  It is intended to help them understand IPP/1.1 and some of
   the considerations that may assist them in the design of their client
   and/or IPP object implementations.  For example, a typical order of
   processing requests is given, including error checking.  Motivation
   for some of the specification decisions is also included.

   The "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols" document gives some
   advice to implementers of gateways between IPP and LPD (Line Printer
   Daemon) implementations.

   In addition to the base IPP documents, the "Event Notification
   Specification" document [ipp-ntfy] defines OPTIONAL operations that
   allow a client to subscribe to printing related events.
   Subscriptions include "Per-Job subscriptions" and "Per-Printer
   subscriptions".  Subscriptions are modeled as Subscription objects.
   Four other operations are defined for subscription objects:  get
   attributes, get subscriptions, renew a subscription, and cancel a
   subscription.




























Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 15]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


11 Authors' Addresses

   Tom Hastings
   Xerox Corporation
   737 Hawaii St.  ESAE 231
   El Segundo, CA  90245

   Phone: 310-333-6413
   Fax: 310-333-5514
   EMail: hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com

   Harry Lewis
   IBM
   6300 Diagonal Hwy
   Boulder, CO 80301-9191

   Phone: (303) 924-5337
   EMail:  harryl@us.ibm.com

   Ron Bergman (Editor)
   Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions
   1757 Tapo Canyon Road
   Simi Valley, CA 93063-3394

   Phone: 805-578-4421
   Fax:  805-578-4001
   EMail: rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com

   IPP Web Page:  http://www.pwg.org/ipp/
   IPP Mailing List:  ipp@pwg.org

   To subscribe to the ipp mailing list, send the following email:

      1) send it to majordomo@pwg.org
      2) leave the subject line blank
      3) put the following two lines in the message body:
            subscribe ipp
            end

   Implementers of this specification document are encouraged to join
   the IPP Mailing List in order to participate in any discussions of
   clarification issues and review of registration proposals for
   additional attributes and values.  In order to reduce spam, the
   mailing list rejects mail from non-subscribers, so you must subscribe
   to the mailing list in order to send a question or comment to the
   mailing list.





Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 16]
^L
RFC 3381              IPP: Job Progress Attributes        September 2002


12 Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.



















Hastings, et. al.           Standards Track                    [Page 17]
^L