1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
|
Network Working Group G. Huston
Request for Comments: 3849 Telstra
Category: Informational A. Lord
APNIC
P. Smith
Cisco
July 2004
IPv6 Address Prefix Reserved for Documentation
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
Abstract
To reduce the likelihood of conflict and confusion when relating
documented examples to deployed systems, an IPv6 unicast address
prefix is reserved for use in examples in RFCs, books, documentation,
and the like. Since site-local and link-local unicast addresses have
special meaning in IPv6, these addresses cannot be used in many
example situations. The document describes the use of the IPv6
address prefix 2001:DB8::/32 as a reserved prefix for use in
documentation.
1. Introduction
The address architecture for IPv6 [1] does not specifically allocate
an IPv6 address prefix for use for documentation purposes.
Documentation material is currently using address prefixes drawn from
address blocks already allocated or assigned to existing
organizations or to well known ISPs, or drawn from the currently
unallocated address pool. Such use conflicts with existing or future
allocations or assignments of IPv6 address space.
The problems such conflicts may cause have already been encountered
with IPv4 where literal use of documented examples in a production
environment causes address and routing conflicts with existing
services. In making an explicit allocation of a documentation
address prefix, it is intended that such operational problems may be
avoided for IPv6.
Huston, et al. Informational [Page 1]
^L
RFC 3849 IPv6 Documentation Address July 2004
Similar, but different, discussion also applies to top level domain
names and some have been reserved for similar purposes [2].
2. Documentation IPv6 Address Prefix
To allow documentation to accurately describe deployment examples,
the use of site local or link local addresses is inappropriate, and a
unicast address block is required. All IPv6 unicast address space is
currently marked as reserved, unassigned or has been assigned to the
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) for further redistribution
to the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) [1], but no unicast
address space has been specifically nominated for the purposes of use
in documented examples.
Following acceptance within the Asia Pacific regional addressing
community of a proposal for a block of IPv6 address space to be
reserved for documentation purposes, the Asia Pacific Network
Information Centre (APNIC) allocated a unicast address prefix for
documentation purposes. The address block is within the range of a
conventional allocation size, so that documentation can accurately
match deployment scenarios.
The documentation prefix described in this memo can also be used to
generate multicast addresses for documentation, using the Unicast
prefix-based proposal [3]. Representing other kinds of multicast
addresses in documentation is outside the scope of this memo.
The prefix allocated for documentation purposes is 2001:DB8::/32
3. Operational Implications
This assignment implies that IPv6 network operators should add this
address prefix to the list of non-routeable IPv6 address space, and
if packet filters are deployed, then this address prefix should be
added to packet filters.
This is not a local-use address prefix, and the filters may be used
in both local and public contexts.
4. IANA Considerations
IANA is to record the allocation of the IPv6 global unicast address
prefix 2001:DB8::/32 as a documentation-only prefix in the IPv6
address registry. No end party is to be assigned this address.
Huston, et al. Informational [Page 2]
^L
RFC 3849 IPv6 Documentation Address July 2004
5. Security Considerations
IPv6 addressing documents do not have any direct impact on Internet
infrastructure security.
6. Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the work of Marc Blanchet, assisted by Alain
Durand, Robert Elz, Bob Fink, and Dave Thaler, in authoring a
previous proposal for a V6 documentation prefix.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[1] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003.
7.2. Informative References
[2] Eastlake 3rd, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS Names",
BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999.
[3] Haberman, B. and D. Thaler, "Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast
Addresses", RFC 3306, August 2002.
Authors' Addresses
Geoff Huston
Telstra
EMail: gih@apnic.net
Anne Lord
Asia Pacific Network Information Centre
EMail: anne@apnic.net
Philip Smith
Cisco Systems
EMail: pfs@cisco.com
Huston, et al. Informational [Page 3]
^L
RFC 3849 IPv6 Documentation Address July 2004
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Huston, et al. Informational [Page 4]
^L
|
