1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
|
Network Working Group B. Foster
Request for Comments: 3992 F. Andreasen
Category: Informational Cisco Systems
February 2005
Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP)
Lockstep State Reporting Mechanism
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
IESG Note
This document is being published for the information of the
community. It describes a non-IETF protocol that is currently being
deployed in a number of products. Implementers should be aware of
RFC 3015, which was developed in the IETF Megaco Working Group and
the ITU-T SG16, and which is considered the standards-based
(including reviewed security considerations) way to meet the needs
that MGCP was designed to address by the IETF and the ITU-T.
Abstract
A Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) endpoint that has encountered
an adverse failure condition (such as being involved in a transient
call when a Call Agent failover occurred) could be left in a lockstep
state whereby events are quarantined but not notified. The MGCP
package described in this document provides a mechanism for reporting
these situations so that the new Call Agent can take the necessary
fault recovery procedures.
1. Introduction
In the Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) [2], when an endpoint
operating in "step" mode generates a Notify, it will enter the
notification state, where it waits for a response to the Notify.
Furthermore, the endpoint must wait for a new NotificationRequest
before it can resume event processing. As long as the endpoint is
waiting for this NotificationRequest, we say that it is in the
lockstep state.
Foster & Andreasen Informational [Page 1]
^L
RFC 3992 MGCP Lockstep State Reporting Mechanism February 2005
An endpoint that is in the lockstep state cannot perform any event
processing and therefore also cannot generate a new Notify.
Endpoints should only be in the lockstep state for a very short time.
However, in adverse conditions, an endpoint could potentially end in
the lockstep state without the Call Agent realizing it. Clearly,
this could have very negative consequences in terms of the service
provided.
The Lockstep package defined in this document defines extensions to
the EndpointConfiguration and RestartInProgress commands that allow a
Call Agent to request an endpoint to inform it when the endpoint is
in the lockstep state for a specified period of time.
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [1].
2. Lockstep Package
Package Name: LCK
Version: 0
Package Description: The purpose of this package is to provide a
mechanism for reporting a condition in which an endpoint has been in
the "lockstep state" for a specified period of time.
There are two aspects of this package:
* The ability for a Call Agent to request endpoints to report if
they are in lockstep state for a specified period of time.
This is done with the EndpointConfiguration command, as
described in section 2.1.
* The reporting mechanism itself, which is done with a new
"lockstep" RestartMethod for the RSIP command as described in
section 2.2.
2.1. Request to Report Lockstep State
The new "LCK/LST" EndpointConfiguration parameter is used by the Call
Agent to request the reporting of "lockstep" state. It uses the
following ABNF:
"LCK/LST:" 0*WSP LSTIME
LSTIME = 1*(4DIGIT)
Foster & Andreasen Informational [Page 2]
^L
RFC 3992 MGCP Lockstep State Reporting Mechanism February 2005
where LSTIME is expressed in seconds, with a value ranging from 0 to
9999. A value greater than 2*T-HIST (refer to [2]) is RECOMMENDED.
LSTIME is the amount of time the endpoint is in the lockstep state
before reporting. The timer starts when the endpoint enters the
lockstep state and is canceled if the endpoint leaves the lockstep
state before the timeout occurs. The value provided remains in
effect until explicitly changed (or a restart occurs). If the
endpoint is already in the lockstep state when a non-zero timer value
is provided, the lockstep timer is simply started with the value
provided; any existing lockstep timer is cancelled. The value zero
is used to turn off reporting.
This parameter can be audited by using the AuditEndpoint command.
The value returned is the last configured value, or the value zero
when no value was configured.
2.2. Lockstep Restart Method
A new "lockstep" restart method is defined in the "LCK" package. A
RestartInProgress (RSIP) will be sent with this RestartMethod if the
endpoint has been configured with a non-zero value for LSTIME and
that timer has expired. Note that once the lockstep timer has been
set, it can fire only once per Notify command; however it is possible
to set the timer more than once while an endpoint is in lockstep
state (and hence rearm it for that particular Notify). The syntax of
the restart method is as per [2]:
"RM" ":" 0*(WSP) "LCK/lockstep"
RestartDelay (see [2]) is not used with the "lockstep" RestartMethod.
Also, the "lockstep" RestartMethod does not define a service-state,
and thus it will never be returned when auditing the RestartMethod.
3. IANA Considerations
The MGCP package title "Lockstep" with the name "LCK" and version
number zero has been registered with IANA as indicated in Appendix
C.1 in [2].
4. Security Considerations
Section 5 of the base MGCP specification [2] discusses security
requirements for the base MGCP protocol that apply equally to the
package defined in this document. Use of a security Protocol such as
IPsec (RFC 2401, RFC 2406) that provides per message authentication
and integrity services is required to ensure that requests and
responses are obtained from authenticated sources and that messages
Foster & Andreasen Informational [Page 3]
^L
RFC 3992 MGCP Lockstep State Reporting Mechanism February 2005
have not been modified. Without these services, gateways and Call
Agents are open to attacks.
5. Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2] Andreasen, F. and B. Foster, "Media Gateway Control Protocol
(MGCP) Version 1.0", RFC 3435, January 2003.
Authors' Addresses
Bill Foster
Phone: +1 250 758 9418
EMail: bfoster@cisco.com
Flemming Andreasen
Cisco Systems
499 Thornall Street, 8th Floor
Edison, NJ 08837
EMail: fandreas@cisco.com
Foster & Andreasen Informational [Page 4]
^L
RFC 3992 MGCP Lockstep State Reporting Mechanism February 2005
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and at www.rfc-editor.org, and except as set
forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the ISOC's procedures with respect to rights in ISOC Documents can
be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Foster & Andreasen Informational [Page 5]
^L
|
