1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
|
Network Working Group J. Kempf
Request for Comments: 4065 DoCoMo Labs USA
Category: Experimental July 2005
Instructions for Seamoby and
Experimental Mobility Protocol IANA Allocations
Status of This Memo
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
The Seamoby Candidate Access Router Discovery (CARD) protocol and the
Context Transfer Protocol (CXTP) are experimental protocols designed
to accelerate IP handover between wireless access routers. These
protocols require IANA allocations for ICMP type and options, Stream
Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Payload Protocol Identifiers,
port numbers, and registries for certain formatted message options.
This document contains instructions to IANA about which allocations
are required for the Seamoby protocols. The ICMP subtype extension
format for Seamoby has been additionally designed so that it can be
utilized by other experimental mobility protocols, and the SCTP port
number is also available for other experimental mobility protocols.
Kempf Experimental [Page 1]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.................................................. 2
2. Common IPv4 and IPv6 Allocations.............................. 2
3. IPv4 Allocations.............................................. 3
4. IPv6 Allocations.............................................. 3
5. Candidate Access Router Discovery Protocol Registries......... 3
6. Context Transfer Profile Type Registry........................ 5
7. Context Transfer Protocol Authorization Token Calculation
Algorithm..................................................... 5
8. ICMP Experimental Mobility Subtype Format and Registry........ 5
9. Utilization by Other Experimental Mobility Protocols.......... 6
10. Normative References.......................................... 6
11. Security Considerations....................................... 7
12. IANA Considerations........................................... 7
1. Introduction
The Seamoby Candidate Access Router Discovery (CARD) protocol
[RFC4066] and the Context Transfer Protocol (CXTP) [RFC4067] are
experimental protocols designed to accelerate IP handover between
wireless access routers. These protocols require IANA allocations
for ICMP options and type, SCTP Payload Protocol Identifiers, port
numbers, and the establishment of registries for certain formatted
message options. Because the protocols are experimental, there is no
guarantee that they will ever see widespread deployment in their
current form. Consequently, it is prudent to conserve Internet
numbering resources that might be needed for other protocols that
could see wider deployment. This document contains instructions to
IANA for the Seamoby protocols. Additionally, the ICMP subtype
extension format has been designed so that it could be used by other
experimental mobility protocols.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Allocation policy names Specification Required, IETF Consensus
Action, and Designated Expert are to be interpreted as described in
RFC 2434 [RFC2434].
2. Common IPv4 and IPv6 Allocations
IANA has assigned SCTP port numbers 5090 for use by [RFC4066] and
5091 for use of [RFC4067]. See Section 5.2.1 of [RFC4066] for a
description of the inter-access router CARD protocol use of SCTP, and
Section 3.1 of [RFC4067] for a description of the inter-access router
CXTP use of SCTP.
Kempf Experimental [Page 2]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
3. IPv4 Allocations
IANA has assigned ICMP type 41 for IPv4 identifying ICMP messages
utilized by experimental mobility protocols such as Seamoby. See
Section 5.1.1 of [RFC4066] for a description of experimental mobility
CARD ICMP messages and Section 3.2 of [RFC4067] for the CXTP ICMP
messages, specified by Seamoby. See Section 9 of this document for a
description of the experimental mobility protocol ICMP subtype format
and initial allocations.
IANA has assigned Mobile IPv4 Foreign Agent Discovery [RFC3344]
option type codes for the following:
Code Purpose Reference
---------------------------------------------------------------------
137 CARD MN-AR signature option Section 6.4 of [RFC4066]
138 CARD Request option Section 5.1.2.1 of [RFC4066]
139 CARD Reply option Section 5.1.2.2 of [RFC4066]
4. IPv6 Allocations
IANA has assigned ICMP type code 150 for IPv6 identifying ICMP
messages utilized by experimental mobility protocols such as Seamoby.
See Section 5.1.1 of [RFC4066] for a description of experimental
mobility CARD ICMP messages and Section 3.2 of [RFC4067] for the CXTP
ICMP messages, specified by Seamoby. See Section 9 of this document
for a description of the experimental mobility protocol subtype
format and initial allocations.
IANA has assigned IPv6 RFC 2461 Neighbor Discovery [RFC2461] option
type codes for the following:
Code Purpose Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------
138 CARD Request option Section 5.1.2.1 of [RFC4066]
139 CARD Reply option Section 5.1.2.2 of [RFC4066]
5. Candidate Access Router Discovery Protocol Registries
For CARD, two new registries are created that IANA is to maintain,
named:
1) The AVP Type Registry,
2) The Layer 2 Access Technology Identifier Registry.
These are described in the following subsections.
Kempf Experimental [Page 3]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
5.1. AVP Type Registry
The AVP Type Registry allows for future expansion of the CARD AVP
type space to include new AVPs. AVP Type codes are 16 bit unsigned
integers. See Section 5.1.4 of [RFC4066] for a description of AVPs.
The registry SHALL be initially populated with the following table:
AVP Name Type Code
----------------------------------------------
RESERVED 0x00
Future allocations of AVP type codes will be made through Expert
Review, as defined in RFC 2434.
5.2. Layer 2 Access Technology Identifier Registry
The Layer 2 Access Technology Identifier registry allows the
registration of type codes to uniquely identify specific access
technologies in the L2-Type field of the CARD L2 ID sub-option. L2
ID codes are 16 bit unsigned integers. See Section 5.1.3.1 of
[RFC4066] for a description of the CARD L2 ID sub-option.
The registry SHALL initially be populated with the following table:
Layer 2 Access Technology Type Code
----------------------------------------------
RESERVED 0x00
IEEE 802.3 (Ethernet) 0x01
IEEE 802.11a 0x02
IEEE 802.11b 0x03
IEEE 802.11g 0x04
IEEE 802.15.1(Bluetooth) 0x05
IEEE 802.15.3 0x06
IEEE 802.15.4 0x07
IEEE 802.16 0x08
Future allocation of Layer 2 Access Technology identifiers will be
made by the method of Specification Required, as defined in RFC 2434.
All requests for allocations MUST be accompanied by a reference to a
technical document in which the design of the Layer 2 access
technology is described.
Kempf Experimental [Page 4]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
6. Context Transfer Profile Type Registry
CXTP requires IANA to maintain a registry named the Context Transfer
Profile Type Registry, which is a registry of context Feature Profile
Type identifiers. Feature Profile Type identifiers are 16 bit
unsigned integers that identify particular types of feature contexts.
See Section 2.4 of [RFC4067] for a description of how contexts are
carried in CXTP.
The registry SHALL initially be populated with the following table:
Context Profile Type Code
----------------------------------------------
RESERVED 0x00
IPv6 Multicast Listener Context 0x01
Future allocations of Feature Profile Type codes will be made through
Expert Review, as defined in RFC 2434.
7. Context Transfer Protocol Authorization Token Calculation Algorithm
In Section 2.5.4 of [RFC4067], CXTP requires an authorization token
calculation algorithm indicator. Currently, the only indicator
defined is 0x1, for HMAC_SHA1. Additional algorithms may be added by
the method of Specification Required [RFC2434].
8. ICMP Experimental Mobility Subtype Format and Registry
The ICMP Experimental Mobility Type is utilized by CARD and CXTP in
the following way. The interpretation of the Code field is as
defined by the relevant ICMP standard for IPv4 and IPv6, and does not
change. The protocols are free to utilize the Code for their own
purposes. The ICMP Experimental Mobility Type defines a one octet
subtype field within the ICMP Reserved field that identifies the
specific protocol. The ICMP header for the Experimental Mobility
Type is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Subtype | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Options...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Type For IPv4, 41; for IPv6 150
Kempf Experimental [Page 5]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
Code As defined by the relevant ICMP specification and
free for use by the Experimental Mobility protocol.
Checksum ICMP checksum
Subtype One octet subtype code identifying the Experimental
Mobility protocol
Reserved Unless otherwise defined by the Experimental Mobility
protocol, set to zero by the sender and ignored by
the receiver.
Options As defined by the Experimental Mobility protocol.
IANA SHALL maintain a registry of one octet unsigned integer subtype
codes for the Experimental Mobility protocols called the Experimental
Mobility Protocol Subtype Registry.
Initial allocations in the registry SHALL be established as follows:
Protocol/Message Subtype Reference
----------------------------------------------------------
CARD 0 Section 5.1.1 of [RFC4066]
CXTP 1 Section 3.2 of [RFC4067]
Subsequent allocations of subtype codes SHALL be made by the method
of Specification Required and IESG Review as defined in RFC 2434.
9. Usage by Other Experimental Mobility Protocols
The ICMP Experimental Mobility type code is available for other
experimental mobility protocols to use. Other experimental mobility
protocols MAY define additional ICMP messages that use code points
under the Experimental Mobility ICMP type.
10. Normative References
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998.
[RFC2461] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., and W. Simpson, "Neighbor
Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December
1998.
[RFC3344] Perkins, C., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC 3344,
August 2002.
Kempf Experimental [Page 6]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
[RFC4066] Liebsch, M., Ed., Singh, A., Ed., Chaskar, H., Funato, D.,
and E. Shim, "Candidate Access Router Discovery (CARD)",
RFC 4066, July 2005.
[RFC4067] Loughney, J., Ed., Nahkjiri, M., Perkins, C., and R.
Koodli, "Context Transfer Protocol", RFC 4067, July 2005.
11. Security Considerations
There are no security considerations associated with this document.
12. IANA Considerations
This entire document is about IANA considerations.
Author's Address
James Kempf
DoCoMo Labs USA
181 Metro Drive
Suite 300
San Jose, CA
95110
Phone: +1 408 451 4711
EMail: kempf@docomolabs-usa.com
Kempf Experimental [Page 7]
^L
RFC 4065 Seamoby IANA Allocations July 2005
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Kempf Experimental [Page 8]
^L
|
