1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
|
Network Working Group M. Johnston
Request for Comments: 4578 Intel Corporation
Category: Informational S. Venaas, Ed.
UNINETT
November 2006
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Options for the
Intel Preboot eXecution Environment (PXE)
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006).
Abstract
We define Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) options being
used by Preboot eXecution Environment (PXE) and Extensible Firmware
Interface (EFI) clients to uniquely identify booting client machines
and their pre-OS runtime environment so that the DHCP and/or PXE boot
server can return the correct OS bootstrap image (or pre-boot
application) name and server to the client.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
1.1. Requirements Language ......................................2
2. Option Definitions ..............................................2
2.1. Client System Architecture Type Option Definition ..........2
2.2. Client Network Interface Identifier Option Definition ......3
2.3. Client Machine Identifier Option Definition ................4
2.4. Options Requested by PXE Clients ...........................4
3. Acknowledgements ................................................5
4. IANA Considerations .............................................5
5. Security Considerations .........................................5
6. Normative References ............................................5
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 1]
^L
RFC 4578 DHCP PXE Options November 2006
1. Introduction
These DHCP [2] options are being widely used by PXE-compliant clients
to uniquely identify booting client machines themselves and their
pre-OS runtime environment so that the DHCP and/or PXE boot server
can return the correct OS bootstrap image (or pre-boot application)
name and server to the client. In the past, this work was done by
examining the network Media Access Code (MAC) address in the "chaddr"
field in the BOOTP/ DHCP header and keeping a database of MAC
addresses on the BOOTP/DHCP server. This was deemed insufficient for
large and complex networks for two main reasons. 1) Multiple laptops
could end up with the same MAC address if the network interface was
in a shared docking station. 2) Multiple network devices and MAC
addresses could be used by one machine for redundancy or because of
repairs. Another issue that came up was the machine that could
change its pre-OS runtime environment. This issue caused the
creation of another new option to identify the runtime environment so
that the correct binary image could be matched up with the booting
machine. These options are defined by Intel in the PXE [3] and EFI
[4] specifications and are being documented in this draft for
completeness within the IETF.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].
2. Option Definitions
There are three DHCP options [5] defined for use by PXE clients.
2.1. Client System Architecture Type Option Definition
The format of the option is:
Code Len 16-bit Type
+----+-----+-----+-----+
| 93 | n | n1 | n2 |
+----+-----+-----+-----+
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 2]
^L
RFC 4578 DHCP PXE Options November 2006
Octet "n" gives the number of octets containing "architecture types"
(not including the code and len fields). It MUST be an even number
greater than zero. Clients that support more than one architecture
type MAY include a list of these types in their initial DHCP and PXE
boot server packets. The list of supported architecture types MAY be
reduced in any packet exchange between the client and server(s).
Octets "n1" and "n2" encode a 16-bit architecture type identifier
that describes the pre-boot runtime environment(s) of the client
machine.
As of the writing of this document, the following pre-boot
architecture types have been requested.
Type Architecture Name
---- -----------------
0 Intel x86PC
1 NEC/PC98
2 EFI Itanium
3 DEC Alpha
4 Arc x86
5 Intel Lean Client
6 EFI IA32
7 EFI BC
8 EFI Xscale
9 EFI x86-64
This option MUST be present in all DHCP and PXE packets sent by PXE-
compliant clients and servers.
2.2. Client Network Interface Identifier Option Definition
The format of the option is:
Code Len Type Major Minor
+----+-----+----+-----+-----+
| 94 | 3 | t | M | m |
+----+-----+----+-----+-----+
Octet "t" encodes a network interface type. For now the only
supported value is 1 for Universal Network Device Interface (UNDI).
Octets "M" and "m" describe the interface revision. To encode the
UNDI revision of 2.11, "M" would be set to 2, and "m" would be set to
11 (0x0B).
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 3]
^L
RFC 4578 DHCP PXE Options November 2006
Revision Description
-------- -----------
< 2.00 LANDesk service agent boot ROMs. No PXE APIs.
2.00 First generation PXE boot ROMs. (PXENV+) [3]
2.01 Second generation PXE boot ROMs. (!PXE) [3]
3.00 32/64-bit UNDI specification. (Alpha) [4]
EFI boot services driver only.
No EFI runtime support.
3.10 32/64-bit UNDI specification. (Beta) [4]
First generation EFI runtime driver support.
3.20 32/64-bit UNDI specification. (Release) [4]
Second generation EFI runtime driver support.
This option MUST be present in all DHCP and PXE packets sent by PXE-
compliant clients and servers.
2.3. Client Machine Identifier Option Definition
The format of the option is:
Code Len Type Machine Identifier
+----+-----+----+-----+ . . . +-----+
| 97 | n | t | | . . . | |
+----+-----+----+-----+ . . . +-----+
Octet "t" describes the type of the machine identifier in the
remaining octets in this option. 0 (zero) is the only value defined
for this octet at the present time, and it describes the remaining
octets as a 16-octet Globally Unique Identifier (GUID). Octet "n" is
17 for type 0. (One definition of GUID can be found in Appendix A of
the EFI specification [4].)
This option MUST be present in all DHCP and PXE packets sent by PXE-
compliant clients and servers.
2.4. Options Requested by PXE Clients
All compliant PXE clients MUST include a request for DHCP options 128
through 135 in all DHCP and PXE packets. The format and contents of
these options are NOT defined by the PXE specification. These
options MAY be present in the DHCP and PXE boot server replies and
are meant for use by the downloaded network bootstrap programs.
These options are NOT used by the PXE boot ROMs.
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 4]
^L
RFC 4578 DHCP PXE Options November 2006
As options 128-135 are not officially assigned for PXE use (before
November 2004 they were considered site-specific options, [6]), use
of these option values for PXE may conflict with other uses of the
same options on the same networks.
3. Acknowledgements
The authors thank Bernie Volz for valuable input.
4. IANA Considerations
IANA has updated the numbering space defined for public DHCP options
in [7] with references to this document for options 93, 94, and 97
(previously, there were references to [8]). Also, IANA marked
options 128-135 as being used by PXE and referenced this document.
5. Security Considerations
By specifying incorrect values for some of these options, a client
may get access to, and possibly attempt to execute, code intended for
another platform or client. This may have security ramifications.
Also note that these options contain information about a client's
system architecture and pre-OS runtime environment that is revealed
to anyone who is able to listen in on DHCP messages sent by the
client. This information may be of use to potential attackers.
6. Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131,
March 1997.
[3] Henry, M. and M. Johnston, "Preboot Execution Environment (PXE)
Specification", September 1999,
<http://www.pix.net/software/pxeboot/archive/pxespec.pdf>.
[4] Intel Corp., "Extensible Firmware Interface Specification",
December 2002, <http://developer.intel.com/technology/efi/
main_specification.htm>.
[5] Alexander, S. and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor
Extensions", RFC 2132, March 1997.
[6] Volz, B., "Reclassifying Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
version 4 (DHCPv4) Options", RFC 3942, November 2004.
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 5]
^L
RFC 4578 DHCP PXE Options November 2006
[7] Droms, R., "Procedures and IANA Guidelines for Definition of New
DHCP Options and Message Types", BCP 43, RFC 2939, September
2000.
[8] Droms, R., "Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
Option Codes", RFC 3679, January 2004.
Authors' Addresses
Michael Johnston
Intel Corporation
MS. JF1-239 2111 NE 25th Ave.
Hillsboro, OR 97124
USA
Phone: +1 503-264-9703
EMail: michael.johnston@intel.com
Stig Venaas
UNINETT
Trondheim NO-7465
Norway
EMail: venaas@uninett.no
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 6]
^L
RFC 4578 DHCP PXE Options November 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST,
AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT
THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Johnston & Venaas Informational [Page 7]
^L
|
