path: root/doc/rfc/rfc7826.txt

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                    H. Schulzrinne
Request for Comments: 7826                           Columbia University
Obsoletes: 2326                                                   A. Rao
Category: Standards Track                                          Cisco
ISSN: 2070-1721                                              R. Lanphier

                                                           M. Westerlund
                                                                Ericsson
                                                     M. Stiemerling, Ed.
                                University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt
                                                           December 2016


                Real-Time Streaming Protocol Version 2.0

Abstract

   This memorandum defines the Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)
   version 2.0, which obsoletes RTSP version 1.0 defined in RFC 2326.

   RTSP is an application-layer protocol for the setup and control of
   the delivery of data with real-time properties.  RTSP provides an
   extensible framework to enable controlled, on-demand delivery of
   real-time data, such as audio and video.  Sources of data can include
   both live data feeds and stored clips.  This protocol is intended to
   control multiple data delivery sessions; provide a means for choosing
   delivery channels such as UDP, multicast UDP, and TCP; and provide a
   means for choosing delivery mechanisms based upon RTP (RFC 3550).

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7826.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 1]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.

Table of Contents

   1. Introduction ...................................................10
   2. Protocol Overview ..............................................11
      2.1. Presentation Description ..................................12
      2.2. Session Establishment .....................................12
      2.3. Media Delivery Control ....................................14
      2.4. Session Parameter Manipulations ...........................15
      2.5. Media Delivery ............................................16
           2.5.1. Media Delivery Manipulations .......................16
      2.6. Session Maintenance and Termination .......................19
      2.7. Extending RTSP ............................................20
   3. Document Conventions ...........................................21
      3.1. Notational Conventions ....................................21
      3.2. Terminology ...............................................21
   4. Protocol Parameters ............................................25
      4.1. RTSP Version ..............................................25
      4.2. RTSP IRI and URI ..........................................25
      4.3. Session Identifiers .......................................28





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 2]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      4.4. Media-Time Formats ........................................28
           4.4.1. SMPTE-Relative Timestamps ..........................28
           4.4.2. Normal Play Time ...................................29
           4.4.3. Absolute Time ......................................30
      4.5. Feature Tags ..............................................31
      4.6. Message Body Tags .........................................32
      4.7. Media Properties ..........................................32
           4.7.1. Random Access and Seeking ..........................33
           4.7.2. Retention ..........................................34
           4.7.3. Content Modifications ..............................34
           4.7.4. Supported Scale Factors ............................34
           4.7.5. Mapping to the Attributes ..........................35
   5. RTSP Message ...................................................35
      5.1. Message Types .............................................36
      5.2. Message Headers ...........................................36
      5.3. Message Body ..............................................37
      5.4. Message Length ............................................37
   6. General-Header Fields ..........................................37
   7. Request ........................................................39
      7.1. Request Line ..............................................40
      7.2. Request-Header Fields .....................................42
   8. Response .......................................................43
      8.1. Status-Line ...............................................43
           8.1.1. Status Code and Reason Phrase ......................43
      8.2. Response Headers ..........................................47
   9. Message Body ...................................................47
      9.1. Message Body Header Fields ................................48
      9.2. Message Body ..............................................49
      9.3. Message Body Format Negotiation ...........................49
   10. Connections ...................................................50
      10.1. Reliability and Acknowledgements .........................50
      10.2. Using Connections ........................................51
      10.3. Closing Connections ......................................54
      10.4. Timing Out Connections and RTSP Messages .................56
      10.5. Showing Liveness .........................................57
      10.6. Use of IPv6 ..............................................58
      10.7. Overload Control .........................................58
   11. Capability Handling ...........................................60
      11.1. Feature Tag: play.basic ..................................62
   12. Pipelining Support ............................................62
   13. Method Definitions ............................................63
      13.1. OPTIONS ..................................................65
      13.2. DESCRIBE .................................................66
      13.3. SETUP ....................................................68
           13.3.1. Changing Transport Parameters .....................71
      13.4. PLAY .....................................................72
           13.4.1. General Usage .....................................72
           13.4.2. Aggregated Sessions ...............................77



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 3]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


           13.4.3. Updating Current PLAY Requests ....................78
           13.4.4. Playing On-Demand Media ...........................81
           13.4.5. Playing Dynamic On-Demand Media ...................81
           13.4.6. Playing Live Media ................................81
           13.4.7. Playing Live with Recording .......................82
           13.4.8. Playing Live with Time-Shift ......................83
      13.5. PLAY_NOTIFY ..............................................83
           13.5.1. End-of-Stream .....................................84
           13.5.2. Media-Properties-Update ...........................86
           13.5.3. Scale-Change ......................................87
      13.6. PAUSE ....................................................89
      13.7. TEARDOWN .................................................92
           13.7.1. Client to Server ..................................92
           13.7.2. Server to Client ..................................93
      13.8. GET_PARAMETER ............................................94
      13.9. SET_PARAMETER ............................................96
      13.10. REDIRECT ................................................98
   14. Embedded (Interleaved) Binary Data ...........................101
   15. Proxies ......................................................103
      15.1. Proxies and Protocol Extensions .........................104
      15.2. Multiplexing and Demultiplexing of Messages .............105
   16. Caching ......................................................106
      16.1. Validation Model ........................................107
           16.1.1. Last-Modified Dates ..............................108
           16.1.2. Message Body Tag Cache Validators ................108
           16.1.3. Weak and Strong Validators .......................108
           16.1.4. Rules for When to Use Message Body Tags
                   and Last-Modified Dates ..........................110
           16.1.5. Non-validating Conditionals ......................112
      16.2. Invalidation after Updates or Deletions .................112
   17. Status Code Definitions ......................................113
      17.1. Informational 1xx .......................................113
           17.1.1. 100 Continue .....................................113
      17.2. Success 2xx .............................................113
           17.2.1. 200 OK ...........................................113
      17.3. Redirection 3xx .........................................113
           17.3.1. 300 ..............................................114
           17.3.2. 301 Moved Permanently ............................114
           17.3.3. 302 Found ........................................114
           17.3.4. 303 See Other ....................................115
           17.3.5. 304 Not Modified .................................115
           17.3.6. 305 Use Proxy ....................................115
      17.4. Client Error 4xx ........................................116
           17.4.1. 400 Bad Request ..................................116
           17.4.2. 401 Unauthorized .................................116
           17.4.3. 402 Payment Required .............................116
           17.4.4. 403 Forbidden ....................................116
           17.4.5. 404 Not Found ....................................116



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 4]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


           17.4.6. 405 Method Not Allowed ...........................117
           17.4.7. 406 Not Acceptable ...............................117
           17.4.8. 407 Proxy Authentication Required ................117
           17.4.9. 408 Request Timeout ..............................117
           17.4.10. 410 Gone ........................................118
           17.4.11. 412 Precondition Failed .........................118
           17.4.12. 413 Request Message Body Too Large ..............118
           17.4.13. 414 Request-URI Too Long ........................118
           17.4.14. 415 Unsupported Media Type ......................119
           17.4.15. 451 Parameter Not Understood ....................119
           17.4.16. 452 Illegal Conference Identifier ...............119
           17.4.17. 453 Not Enough Bandwidth ........................119
           17.4.18. 454 Session Not Found ...........................119
           17.4.19. 455 Method Not Valid in This State ..............119
           17.4.20. 456 Header Field Not Valid for Resource .........119
           17.4.21. 457 Invalid Range ...............................120
           17.4.22. 458 Parameter Is Read-Only ......................120
           17.4.23. 459 Aggregate Operation Not Allowed .............120
           17.4.24. 460 Only Aggregate Operation Allowed ............120
           17.4.25. 461 Unsupported Transport .......................120
           17.4.26. 462 Destination Unreachable .....................120
           17.4.27. 463 Destination Prohibited ......................120
           17.4.28. 464 Data Transport Not Ready Yet ................121
           17.4.29. 465 Notification Reason Unknown .................121
           17.4.30. 466 Key Management Error ........................121
           17.4.31. 470 Connection Authorization Required ...........121
           17.4.32. 471 Connection Credentials Not Accepted .........121
           17.4.33. 472 Failure to Establish Secure Connection ......121
      17.5. Server Error 5xx ........................................122
           17.5.1. 500 Internal Server Error ........................122
           17.5.2. 501 Not Implemented ..............................122
           17.5.3. 502 Bad Gateway ..................................122
           17.5.4. 503 Service Unavailable ..........................122
           17.5.5. 504 Gateway Timeout ..............................123
           17.5.6. 505 RTSP Version Not Supported ...................123
           17.5.7. 551 Option Not Supported .........................123
           17.5.8. 553 Proxy Unavailable ............................123
   18. Header Field Definitions .....................................124
      18.1. Accept ..................................................134
      18.2. Accept-Credentials ......................................135
      18.3. Accept-Encoding .........................................135
      18.4. Accept-Language .........................................136
      18.5. Accept-Ranges ...........................................137
      18.6. Allow ...................................................138
      18.7. Authentication-Info .....................................138
      18.8. Authorization ...........................................138
      18.9. Bandwidth ...............................................139
      18.10. Blocksize ..............................................140



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 5]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      18.11. Cache-Control ..........................................140
      18.12. Connection .............................................143
      18.13. Connection-Credentials .................................143
      18.14. Content-Base ...........................................144
      18.15. Content-Encoding .......................................145
      18.16. Content-Language .......................................145
      18.17. Content-Length .........................................146
      18.18. Content-Location .......................................146
      18.19. Content-Type ...........................................148
      18.20. CSeq ...................................................148
      18.21. Date ...................................................150
      18.22. Expires ................................................151
      18.23. From ...................................................151
      18.24. If-Match ...............................................152
      18.25. If-Modified-Since ......................................152
      18.26. If-None-Match ..........................................153
      18.27. Last-Modified ..........................................154
      18.28. Location ...............................................154
      18.29. Media-Properties .......................................154
      18.30. Media-Range ............................................156
      18.31. MTag ...................................................157
      18.32. Notify-Reason ..........................................158
      18.33. Pipelined-Requests .....................................158
      18.34. Proxy-Authenticate .....................................159
      18.35. Proxy-Authentication-Info ..............................159
      18.36. Proxy-Authorization ....................................159
      18.37. Proxy-Require ..........................................160
      18.38. Proxy-Supported ........................................160
      18.39. Public .................................................161
      18.40. Range ..................................................162
      18.41. Referrer ...............................................164
      18.42. Request-Status .........................................164
      18.43. Require ................................................165
      18.44. Retry-After ............................................166
      18.45. RTP-Info ...............................................167
      18.46. Scale ..................................................169
      18.47. Seek-Style .............................................170
      18.48. Server .................................................171
      18.49. Session ................................................172
      18.50. Speed ..................................................173
      18.51. Supported ..............................................174
      18.52. Terminate-Reason .......................................175
      18.53. Timestamp ..............................................175
      18.54. Transport ..............................................176
      18.55. Unsupported ............................................183
      18.56. User-Agent .............................................184
      18.57. Via ....................................................184
      18.58. WWW-Authenticate .......................................185



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 6]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   19. Security Framework ...........................................185
      19.1. RTSP and HTTP Authentication ............................185
           19.1.1. Digest Authentication ............................186
      19.2. RTSP over TLS ...........................................187
      19.3. Security and Proxies ....................................188
           19.3.1. Accept-Credentials ...............................189
           19.3.2. User-Approved TLS Procedure ......................190
   20. Syntax .......................................................192
      20.1. Base Syntax .............................................193
      20.2. RTSP Protocol Definition ................................195
           20.2.1. Generic Protocol Elements ........................195
           20.2.2. Message Syntax ...................................198
           20.2.3. Header Syntax ....................................201
      20.3. SDP Extension Syntax ....................................209
   21. Security Considerations ......................................209
      21.1. Signaling Protocol Threats ..............................210
      21.2. Media Stream Delivery Threats ...........................213
           21.2.1. Remote DoS Attack ................................215
           21.2.2. RTP Security Analysis ............................216
   22. IANA Considerations ..........................................217
      22.1. Feature Tags ............................................218
           22.1.1. Description ......................................218
           22.1.2. Registering New Feature Tags with IANA ...........218
           22.1.3. Registered Entries ...............................219
      22.2. RTSP Methods ............................................219
           22.2.1. Description ......................................219
           22.2.2. Registering New Methods with IANA ................219
           22.2.3. Registered Entries ...............................220
      22.3. RTSP Status Codes .......................................220
           22.3.1. Description ......................................220
           22.3.2. Registering New Status Codes with IANA ...........220
           22.3.3. Registered Entries ...............................221
      22.4. RTSP Headers ............................................221
           22.4.1. Description ......................................221
           22.4.2. Registering New Headers with IANA ................221
           22.4.3. Registered Entries ...............................222
      22.5. Accept-Credentials ......................................223
           22.5.1. Accept-Credentials Policies ......................223
           22.5.2. Accept-Credentials Hash Algorithms ...............224
      22.6. Cache-Control Cache Directive Extensions ................224
      22.7. Media Properties ........................................225
           22.7.1. Description ......................................225
           22.7.2. Registration Rules ...............................226
           22.7.3. Registered Values ................................226
      22.8. Notify-Reason Values ....................................226
           22.8.1. Description ......................................226
           22.8.2. Registration Rules ...............................226
           22.8.3. Registered Values ................................227



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 7]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      22.9. Range Header Formats ....................................227
           22.9.1. Description ......................................227
           22.9.2. Registration Rules ...............................227
           22.9.3. Registered Values ................................228
      22.10. Terminate-Reason Header ................................228
           22.10.1. Redirect Reasons ................................228
           22.10.2. Terminate-Reason Header Parameters ..............229
      22.11. RTP-Info Header Parameters .............................229
           22.11.1. Description .....................................229
           22.11.2. Registration Rules ..............................229
           22.11.3. Registered Values ...............................230
      22.12. Seek-Style Policies ....................................230
           22.12.1. Description .....................................230
           22.12.2. Registration Rules ..............................230
           22.12.3. Registered Values ...............................230
      22.13. Transport Header Registries ............................231
           22.13.1. Transport Protocol Identifier ...................231
           22.13.2. Transport Modes .................................233
           22.13.3. Transport Parameters ............................233
      22.14. URI Schemes ............................................234
           22.14.1. The "rtsp" URI Scheme ...........................234
           22.14.2. The "rtsps" URI Scheme ..........................235
           22.14.3. The "rtspu" URI Scheme ..........................237
      22.15. SDP Attributes .........................................238
      22.16. Media Type Registration for text/parameters ............238
   23. References ...................................................240
      23.1. Normative References ....................................240
      23.2. Informative References ..................................245
   Appendix A. Examples .............................................248
      A.1. Media on Demand (Unicast) ................................248
      A.2. Media on Demand Using Pipelining .........................251
      A.3. Secured Media Session for On-Demand Content ..............254
      A.4. Media on Demand (Unicast) ................................257
      A.5. Single-Stream Container Files ............................260
      A.6. Live Media Presentation Using Multicast ..................263
      A.7. Capability Negotiation ...................................264
   Appendix B. RTSP Protocol State Machine ..........................265
      B.1. States ...................................................266
      B.2. State Variables ..........................................266
      B.3. Abbreviations ............................................266
      B.4. State Tables .............................................267
   Appendix C. Media-Transport Alternatives .........................272
      C.1. RTP ......................................................272
        C.1.1. AVP ..................................................272
        C.1.2. AVP/UDP ..............................................273
        C.1.3. AVPF/UDP .............................................274
        C.1.4. SAVP/UDP .............................................275
        C.1.5. SAVPF/UDP ............................................277



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 8]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


        C.1.6. RTCP Usage with RTSP .................................278
      C.2. RTP over TCP .............................................279
        C.2.1. Interleaved RTP over TCP .............................280
        C.2.2. RTP over Independent TCP .............................280
      C.3. Handling Media-Clock Time Jumps in the RTP Media Layer ...284
      C.4. Handling RTP Timestamps after PAUSE ......................287
      C.5. RTSP/RTP Integration  ....................................290
      C.6. Scaling with RTP .........................................290
      C.7. Maintaining NPT Synchronization with RTP Timestamps ......290
      C.8. Continuous Audio .........................................290
      C.9. Multiple Sources in an RTP Session .......................290
      C.10. Usage of SSRCs and the RTCP BYE Message during an RTSP
            Session .................................................290
      C.11. Future Additions ........................................291
   Appendix D. Use of SDP for RTSP Session Descriptions .............292
      D.1. Definitions  .............................................292
        D.1.1. Control URI ..........................................292
        D.1.2. Media Streams ........................................294
        D.1.3. Payload Type(s) ......................................294
        D.1.4. Format-Specific Parameters ...........................294
        D.1.5. Directionality of Media Stream .......................295
        D.1.6. Range of Presentation ................................295
        D.1.7. Time of Availability .................................296
        D.1.8. Connection Information ...............................297
        D.1.9. Message Body Tag .....................................297
      D.2. Aggregate Control Not Available ..........................298
      D.3. Aggregate Control Available ..............................298
      D.4. Grouping of Media Lines in SDP ...........................299
      D.5. RTSP External SDP Delivery ...............................300
   Appendix E. RTSP Use Cases .......................................300
      E.1. On-Demand Playback of Stored Content .....................300
      E.2. Unicast Distribution of Live Content .....................302
      E.3. On-Demand Playback Using Multicast .......................303
      E.4. Inviting an RTSP Server into a Conference ................303
      E.5. Live Content Using Multicast .............................304
   Appendix F. Text Format for Parameters ...........................305
   Appendix G. Requirements for Unreliable Transport of RTSP ........305
   Appendix H. Backwards-Compatibility Considerations ...............306
      H.1. Play Request in Play State ...............................307
      H.2. Using Persistent Connections .............................307
   Appendix I. Changes ..............................................307
      I.1. Brief Overview ...........................................308
      I.2. Detailed List of Changes .................................309
   Acknowledgements .................................................316
   Contributors  ....................................................317
   Authors' Addresses ...............................................318





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                    [Page 9]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


1.  Introduction

   This memo defines version 2.0 of the Real-Time Streaming Protocol
   (RTSP 2.0).  RTSP 2.0 is an application-layer protocol for the setup
   and control over the delivery of data with real-time properties,
   typically streaming media.  Streaming media is, for instance, video
   on demand or audio live streaming.  Put simply, RTSP acts as a
   "network remote control" for multimedia servers.

   The protocol operates between RTSP 2.0 clients and servers, but it
   also supports the use of proxies placed between clients and servers.
   Clients can request information about streaming media from servers by
   asking for a description of the media or use media description
   provided externally.  The media delivery protocol is used to
   establish the media streams described by the media description.
   Clients can then request to play out the media, pause it, or stop it
   completely.  The requested media can consist of multiple audio and
   video streams that are delivered as time-synchronized streams from
   servers to clients.

   RTSP 2.0 is a replacement of RTSP 1.0 [RFC2326] and this document
   obsoletes that specification.  This protocol is based on RTSP 1.0 but
   is not backwards compatible other than in the basic version
   negotiation mechanism.  The changes between the two documents are
   listed in Appendix I.  There are many reasons why RTSP 2.0 can't be
   backwards compatible with RTSP 1.0; some of the main ones are as
   follows:

   o  Most headers that needed to be extensible did not define the
      allowed syntax, preventing safe deployment of extensions;

   o  the changed behavior of the PLAY method when received in Play
      state;

   o  the changed behavior of the extensibility model and its mechanism;
      and

   o  the change of syntax for some headers.

   There are so many small updates that changing versions became
   necessary to enable clarification and consistent behavior.  Anyone
   implementing RTSP for a new use case in which they have not installed
   RTSP 1.0 should only implement RTSP 2.0 to avoid having to deal with
   RTSP 1.0 inconsistencies.

   This document is structured as follows.  It begins with an overview
   of the protocol operations and its functions in an informal way.
   Then, a set of definitions of terms used and document conventions is



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 10]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   introduced.  These are followed by the actual RTSP 2.0 core protocol
   specification.  The appendices describe and define some
   functionalities that are not part of the core RTSP specification, but
   which are still important to enable some usages.  Among them, the RTP
   usage is defined in Appendix C, the Session Description Protocol
   (SDP) usage with RTSP is defined in Appendix D, and the "text/
   parameters" file format Appendix F, are three normative specification
   appendices.  Other appendices include a number of informational parts
   discussing the changes, use cases, different considerations or
   motivations.

2.  Protocol Overview

   This section provides an informative overview of the different
   mechanisms in the RTSP 2.0 protocol to give the reader a high-level
   understanding before getting into all the specific details.  In case
   of conflict with this description and the later sections, the later
   sections take precedence.  For more information about use cases
   considered for RTSP, see Appendix E.

   RTSP 2.0 is a bidirectional request and response protocol that first
   establishes a context including content resources (the media) and
   then controls the delivery of these content resources from the
   provider to the consumer.  RTSP has three fundamental parts: Session
   Establishment, Media Delivery Control, and an extensibility model
   described below.  The protocol is based on some assumptions about
   existing functionality to provide a complete solution for client-
   controlled real-time media delivery.

   RTSP uses text-based messages, requests and responses, that may
   contain a binary message body.  An RTSP request starts with a method
   line that identifies the method, the protocol, and version and the
   resource on which to act.  The resource is identified by a URI and
   the hostname part of the URI is used by RTSP client to resolve the
   IPv4 or IPv6 address of the RTSP server.  Following the method line
   are a number of RTSP headers.  These lines are ended by two
   consecutive carriage return line feed (CRLF) character pairs.  The
   message body, if present, follows the two CRLF character pairs, and
   the body's length is described by a message header.  RTSP responses
   are similar, but they start with a response line with the protocol
   and version followed by a status code and a reason phrase.  RTSP
   messages are sent over a reliable transport protocol between the
   client and server.  RTSP 2.0 requires clients and servers to
   implement TCP and TLS over TCP as mandatory transports for RTSP
   messages.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 11]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


2.1.  Presentation Description

   RTSP exists to provide access to multimedia presentations and content
   but tries to be agnostic about the media type or the actual media
   delivery protocol that is used.  To enable a client to implement a
   complete system, an RTSP-external mechanism for describing the
   presentation and the delivery protocol(s) is used.  RTSP assumes that
   this description is either delivered completely out of band or as a
   data object in the response to a client's request using the DESCRIBE
   method (Section 13.2).

   Parameters that commonly have to be included in the presentation
   description are the following:

   o  The number of media streams;

   o  the resource identifier for each media stream/resource that is to
      be controlled by RTSP;

   o  the protocol that will be used to deliver each media stream;

   o  the transport protocol parameters that are not negotiated or vary
      with each client;

   o  the media-encoding information enabling a client to correctly
      decode the media upon reception; and

   o  an aggregate control resource identifier.

   RTSP uses its own URI schemes ("rtsp" and "rtsps") to reference media
   resources and aggregates under common control (see Section 4.2).

   This specification describes in Appendix D how one uses SDP [RFC4566]
   for describing the presentation.

2.2.  Session Establishment

   The RTSP client can request the establishment of an RTSP session
   after having used the presentation description to determine which
   media streams are available, which media delivery protocol is used,
   and the resource identifiers of the media streams.  The RTSP session
   is a common context between the client and the server that consists
   of one or more media resources that are to be under common media
   delivery control.

   The client creates an RTSP session by sending a request using the
   SETUP method (Section 13.3) to the server.  In the Transport header
   (Section 18.54) of the SETUP request, the client also includes all



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 12]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   the transport parameters necessary to enable the media delivery
   protocol to function.  This includes parameters that are
   preestablished by the presentation description but necessary for any
   middlebox to correctly handle the media delivery protocols.  The
   Transport header in a request may contain multiple alternatives for
   media delivery in a prioritized list, which the server can select
   from.  These alternatives are typically based on information in the
   presentation description.

   When receiving a SETUP request, the server determines if the media
   resource is available and if one or more of the of the transport
   parameter specifications are acceptable.  If that is successful, an
   RTSP session context is created and the relevant parameters and state
   is stored.  An identifier is created for the RTSP session and
   included in the response in the Session header (Section 18.49).  The
   SETUP response includes a Transport header that specifies which of
   the alternatives has been selected and relevant parameters.

   A SETUP request that references an existing RTSP session but
   identifies a new media resource is a request to add that media
   resource under common control with the already-present media
   resources in an aggregated session.  A client can expect this to work
   for all media resources under RTSP control within a multimedia
   content container.  However, a server will likely refuse to aggregate
   resources from different content containers.  Even if an RTSP session
   contains only a single media stream, the RTSP session can be
   referenced by the aggregate control URI.

   To avoid an extra round trip in the session establishment of
   aggregated RTSP sessions, RTSP 2.0 supports pipelined requests; i.e.,
   the client can send multiple requests back-to-back without waiting
   first for the completion of any of them.  The client uses a client-
   selected identifier in the Pipelined-Requests header (Section 18.33)
   to instruct the server to bind multiple requests together as if they
   included the session identifier.

   The SETUP response also provides additional information about the
   established sessions in a couple of different headers.  The Media-
   Properties header (Section 18.29) includes a number of properties
   that apply for the aggregate that is valuable when doing media
   delivery control and configuring user interface.  The Accept-Ranges
   header (Section 18.5) informs the client about range formats that the
   server supports for these media resources.  The Media-Range header
   (Section 18.30) informs the client about the time range of the media
   currently available.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 13]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


2.3.  Media Delivery Control

   After having established an RTSP session, the client can start
   controlling the media delivery.  The basic operations are "begin
   playback", using the PLAY method (Section 13.4) and "suspend (pause)
   playback" by using the PAUSE method (Section 13.6).  PLAY also allows
   for choosing the starting media position from which the server should
   deliver the media.  The positioning is done by using the Range header
   (Section 18.40) that supports several different time formats: Normal
   Play Time (NPT) (Section 4.4.2), Society of Motion Picture and
   Television Engineers (SMPTE) Timestamps (Section 4.4.1), and absolute
   time (Section 4.4.3).  The Range header also allows the client to
   specify a position where delivery should end, thus allowing a
   specific interval to be delivered.

   The support for positioning/searching within media content depends on
   the content's media properties.  Content exists in a number of
   different types, such as on-demand, live, and live with simultaneous
   recording.  Even within these categories, there are differences in
   how the content is generated and distributed, which affect how it can
   be accessed for playback.  The properties applicable for the RTSP
   session are provided by the server in the SETUP response using the
   Media-Properties header (Section 18.29).  These are expressed using
   one or several independent attributes.  A first attribute is Random-
   Access, which indicates whether positioning is possible, and with
   what granularity.  Another aspect is whether the content will change
   during the lifetime of the session.  While on-demand content will be
   provided in full from the beginning, a live stream being recorded
   results in the length of the accessible content growing as the
   session goes on.  There also exists content that is dynamically built
   by a protocol other than RTSP and, thus, also changes in steps during
   the session, but maybe not continuously.  Furthermore, when content
   is recorded, there are cases where the complete content is not
   maintained, but, for example, only the last hour.  All of these
   properties result in the need for mechanisms that will be discussed
   below.

   When the client accesses on-demand content that allows random access,
   the client can issue the PLAY request for any point in the content
   between the start and the end.  The server will deliver media from
   the closest random access point prior to the requested point and
   indicate that in its PLAY response.  If the client issues a PAUSE,
   the delivery will be halted and the point at which the server stopped
   will be reported back in the response.  The client can later resume
   by sending a PLAY request without a Range header.  When the server is
   about to complete the PLAY request by delivering the end of the
   content or the requested range, the server will send a PLAY_NOTIFY
   request (Section 13.5) indicating this.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 14]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   When playing live content with no extra functions, such as recording,
   the client will receive the live media from the server after having
   sent a PLAY request.  Seeking in such content is not possible as the
   server does not store it, but only forwards it from the source of the
   session.  Thus, delivery continues until the client sends a PAUSE
   request, tears down the session, or the content ends.

   For live sessions that are being recorded, the client will need to
   keep track of how the recording progresses.  Upon session
   establishment, the client will learn the current duration of the
   recording from the Media-Range header.  Because the recording is
   ongoing, the content grows in direct relation to the time passed.
   Therefore, each server's response to a PLAY request will contain the
   current Media-Range header.  The server should also regularly send
   (approximately every 5 minutes) the current media range in a
   PLAY_NOTIFY request (Section 13.5.2).  If the live transmission ends,
   the server must send a PLAY_NOTIFY request with the updated Media-
   Properties indicating that the content stopped being a recorded live
   session and instead became on-demand content; the request also
   contains the final media range.  While the live delivery continues,
   the client can request to play the current live point by using the
   NPT timescale symbol "now", or it can request a specific point in the
   available content by an explicit range request for that point.  If
   the requested point is outside of the available interval, the server
   will adjust the position to the closest available point, i.e., either
   at the beginning or the end.

   A special case of recording is that where the recording is not
   retained longer than a specific time period; thus, as the live
   delivery continues, the client can access any media within a moving
   window that covers, for example, "now" to "now" minus 1 hour.  A
   client that pauses on a specific point within the content may not be
   able to retrieve the content anymore.  If the client waits too long
   before resuming the pause point, the content may no longer be
   available.  In this case, the pause point will be adjusted to the
   closest point in the available media.

2.4.  Session Parameter Manipulations

   A session may have additional state or functionality that affects how
   the server or client treats the session or content, how it functions,
   or feedback on how well the session works.  Such extensions are not
   defined in this specification, but they may be covered in various
   extensions.  RTSP has two methods for retrieving and setting
   parameter values on either the client or the server: GET_PARAMETER
   (Section 13.8) and SET_PARAMETER (Section 13.9).  These methods carry
   the parameters in a message body of the appropriate format.  One can
   also use headers to query state with the GET_PARAMETER method.  As an



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 15]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   example, clients needing to know the current media range for a time-
   progressing session can use the GET_PARAMETER method and include the
   media range.  Furthermore, synchronization information can be
   requested by using a combination of RTP-Info (Section 18.45) and
   Range (Section 18.40).

   RTSP 2.0 does not have a strong mechanism for negotiating the headers
   or parameters and their formats.  However, responses will indicate
   request-headers or parameters that are not supported.  A priori
   determination of what features are available needs to be done through
   out-of-band mechanisms, like the session description, or through the
   usage of feature tags (Section 4.5).

2.5.  Media Delivery

   This document specifies how media is delivered with RTP [RFC3550]
   over UDP [RFC768], TCP [RFC793], or the RTSP connection.  Additional
   protocols may be specified in the future as needed.

   The usage of RTP as a media delivery protocol requires some
   additional information to function well.  The PLAY response contains
   information to enable reliable and timely delivery of how a client
   should synchronize different sources in the different RTP sessions.
   It also provides a mapping between RTP timestamps and the content-
   time scale.  When the server wants to notify the client about the
   completion of the media delivery, it sends a PLAY_NOTIFY request to
   the client.  The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes information about the
   stream end, including the last RTP sequence number for each stream,
   thus enabling the client to empty the buffer smoothly.

2.5.1.  Media Delivery Manipulations

   The basic playback functionality of RTSP enables delivery of a range
   of requested content to the client at the pace intended by the
   content's creator.  However, RTSP can also manipulate the delivery to
   the client in two ways.

   Scale:  The ratio of media-content time delivered per unit of
      playback time.

   Speed:  The ratio of playback time delivered per unit of wallclock
      time.

   Both affect the media delivery per time unit.  However, they
   manipulate two independent timescales and the effects are possible to
   combine.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 16]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Scale (Section 18.46) is used for fast-forward or slow-motion control
   as it changes the amount of content timescale that should be played
   back per time unit.  Scale > 1.0, means fast forward, e.g., scale =
   2.0 results in that 2 seconds of content being played back every
   second of playback.  Scale = 1.0 is the default value that is used if
   no scale is specified, i.e., playback at the content's original rate.
   Scale values between 0 and 1.0 provide for slow motion.  Scale can be
   negative to allow for reverse playback in either regular pace
   (scale = -1.0), fast backwards (scale < -1.0), or slow-motion
   backwards (-1.0 < scale < 0).  Scale = 0 would be equal to pause and
   is not allowed.

   In most cases, the realization of scale means server-side
   manipulation of the media to ensure that the client can actually play
   it back.  The nature of these media manipulations and when they are
   needed is highly media-type dependent.  Let's consider two common
   media types, audio and video.

   It is very difficult to modify the playback rate of audio.
   Typically, no more than a factor of two is possible while maintaining
   intelligibility by changing the pitch and rate of speech.  Music goes
   out of tune if one tries to manipulate the playback rate by
   resampling it.  This is a well-known problem, and audio is commonly
   muted or played back in short segments with skips to keep up with the
   current playback point.

   For video, it is possible to manipulate the frame rate, although the
   rendering capabilities are often limited to certain frame rates.
   Also, the allowed bitrates in decoding, the structure used in the
   encoding, and the dependency between frames and other capabilities of
   the rendering device limits the possible manipulations.  Therefore,
   the basic fast-forward capabilities often are implemented by
   selecting certain subsets of frames.

   Due to the media restrictions, the possible scale values are commonly
   restricted to the set of realizable scale ratios.  To enable the
   clients to select from the possible scale values, RTSP can signal the
   supported scale ratios for the content.  To support aggregated or
   dynamic content, where this may change during the ongoing session and
   dependent on the location within the content, a mechanism for
   updating the media properties and the scale factor currently in use,
   exists.

   Speed (Section 18.50) affects how much of the playback timeline is
   delivered in a given wallclock period.  The default is Speed = 1
   which means to deliver at the same rate the media is consumed.
   Speed > 1 means that the receiver will get content faster than it
   regularly would consume it.  Speed < 1 means that delivery is slower



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 17]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   than the regular media rate.  Speed values of 0 or lower have no
   meaning and are not allowed.  This mechanism enables two general
   functionalities.  One is client-side scale operations, i.e., the
   client receives all the frames and makes the adjustment to the
   playback locally.  The second is delivery control for the buffering
   of media.  By specifying a speed over 1.0, the client can build up
   the amount of playback time it has present in its buffers to a level
   that is sufficient for its needs.

   A naive implementation of Speed would only affect the transmission
   schedule of the media and has a clear impact on the needed bandwidth.
   This would result in the data rate being proportional to the speed
   factor.  Speed = 1.5, i.e., 50% faster than normal delivery, would
   result in a 50% increase in the data-transport rate.  Whether or not
   that can be supported depends solely on the underlying network path.
   Scale may also have some impact on the required bandwidth due to the
   manipulation of the content in the new playback schedule.  An example
   is fast forward where only the independently decodable intra-frames
   are included in the media stream.  This usage of solely intra-frames
   increases the data rate significantly compared to a normal sequence
   with the same number of frames, where most frames are encoded using
   prediction.

   This potential increase of the data rate needs to be handled by the
   media sender.  The client has requested that the media be delivered
   in a specific way, which should be honored.  However, the media
   sender cannot ignore if the network path between the sender and the
   receiver can't handle the resulting media stream.  In that case, the
   media stream needs to be adapted to fit the available resources of
   the path.  This can result in a reduced media quality.

   The need for bitrate adaptation becomes especially problematic in
   connection with the Speed semantics.  If the goal is to fill up the
   buffer, the client may not want to do that at the cost of reduced
   quality.  If the client wants to make local playout changes, then it
   may actually require that the requested speed be honored.  To resolve
   this issue, Speed uses a range so that both cases can be supported.
   The server is requested to use the highest possible speed value
   within the range, which is compatible with the available bandwidth.
   As long as the server can maintain a speed value within the range, it
   shall not change the media quality, but instead modify the actual
   delivery rate in response to available bandwidth and reflect this in
   the Speed value in the response.  However, if this is not possible,
   the server should instead modify the media quality to respect the
   lowest speed value and the available bandwidth.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 18]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This functionality enables the local scaling implementation to use a
   tight range, or even a range where the lower bound equals the upper
   bound, to identify that it requires the server to deliver the
   requested amount of media time per delivery time, independent of how
   much it needs to adapt the media quality to fit within the available
   path bandwidth.  For buffer filling, it is suitable to use a range
   with a reasonable span and with a lower bound at the nominal media
   rate 1.0, such as 1.0 - 2.5.  If the client wants to reduce the
   buffer, it can specify an upper bound that is below 1.0 to force the
   server to deliver slower than the nominal media rate.

2.6.  Session Maintenance and Termination

   The session context that has been established is kept alive by having
   the client show liveness.  This is done in two main ways:

   o  Media-transport protocol keep-alive.  RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
      may be used when using RTP.

   o  Any RTSP request referencing the session context.

   Section 10.5 discusses the methods for showing liveness in more
   depth.  If the client fails to show liveness for more than the
   established session timeout value (normally 60 seconds), the server
   may terminate the context.  Other values may be selected by the
   server through the inclusion of the timeout parameter in the session
   header.

   The session context is normally terminated by the client sending a
   TEARDOWN request (Section 13.7) to the server referencing the
   aggregated control URI.  An individual media resource can be removed
   from a session context by a TEARDOWN request referencing that
   particular media resource.  If all media resources are removed from a
   session context, the session context is terminated.

   A client may keep the session alive indefinitely if allowed by the
   server; however, a client is advised to release the session context
   when an extended period of time without media delivery activity has
   passed.  The client can re-establish the session context if required
   later.  What constitutes an extended period of time is dependent on
   the client, server, and their usage.  It is recommended that the
   client terminate the session before ten times the session timeout
   value has passed.  A server may terminate the session after one
   session timeout period without any client activity beyond keep-alive.
   When a server terminates the session context, it does so by sending a
   TEARDOWN request indicating the reason.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 19]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   A server can also request that the client tear down the session and
   re-establish it at an alternative server, as may be needed for
   maintenance.  This is done by using the REDIRECT method
   (Section 13.10).  The Terminate-Reason header (Section 18.52) is used
   to indicate when and why.  The Location header indicates where it
   should connect if there is an alternative server available.  When the
   deadline expires, the server simply stops providing the service.  To
   achieve a clean closure, the client needs to initiate session
   termination prior to the deadline.  In case the server has no other
   server to redirect to, and it wants to close the session for
   maintenance, it shall use the TEARDOWN method with a Terminate-Reason
   header.

2.7.  Extending RTSP

   RTSP is quite a versatile protocol that supports extensions in many
   different directions.  Even this core specification contains several
   blocks of functionality that are optional to implement.  The use case
   and need for the protocol deployment should determine what parts are
   implemented.  Allowing for extensions makes it possible for RTSP to
   address additional use cases.  However, extensions will affect the
   interoperability of the protocol; therefore, it is important that
   they can be added in a structured way.

   The client can learn the capability of a server by using the OPTIONS
   method (Section 13.1) and the Supported header (Section 18.51).  It
   can also try and possibly fail using new methods or require that
   particular features be supported using the Require (Section 18.43) or
   Proxy-Require (Section 18.37) header.

   The RTSP, in itself, can be extended in three ways, listed here in
   increasing order of the magnitude of changes supported:

   o  Existing methods can be extended with new parameters, for example,
      headers, as long as these parameters can be safely ignored by the
      recipient.  If the client needs negative acknowledgment when a
      method extension is not supported, a tag corresponding to the
      extension may be added in the field of the Require or Proxy-
      Require headers.

   o  New methods can be added.  If the recipient of the message does
      not understand the request, it must respond with error code 501
      (Not Implemented) so that the sender can avoid using this method
      again.  A client may also use the OPTIONS method to inquire about
      methods supported by the server.  The server must list the methods
      it supports using the Public response-header.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 20]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  A new version of the protocol can be defined, allowing almost all
      aspects (except the position of the protocol version number) to
      change.  A new version of the protocol must be registered through
      a Standards Track document.

   The basic capability discovery mechanism can be used to both discover
   support for a certain feature and to ensure that a feature is
   available when performing a request.  For a detailed explanation of
   this, see Section 11.

   New media delivery protocols may be added and negotiated at session
   establishment, in addition to extensions to the core protocol.
   Certain types of protocol manipulations can be done through parameter
   formats using SET_PARAMETER and GET_PARAMETER.

3.  Document Conventions

3.1.  Notational Conventions

   All the mechanisms specified in this document are described in both
   prose and the Augmented Backus-Naur form (ABNF) described in detail
   in [RFC5234].

   Indented paragraphs are used to provide informative background and
   motivation.  This is intended to give readers who were not involved
   with the formulation of the specification an understanding of why
   things are the way they are in RTSP.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   [RFC2119].

   The word, "unspecified" is used to indicate functionality or features
   that are not defined in this specification.  Such functionality
   cannot be used in a standardized manner without further definition in
   an extension specification to RTSP.

3.2.  Terminology

   Aggregate control:  The concept of controlling multiple streams using
      a single timeline, generally one maintained by the server.  A
      client, for example, uses aggregate control when it issues a
      single play or pause message to simultaneously control both the
      audio and video in a movie.  A session that is under aggregate
      control is referred to as an "aggregated session".





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 21]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Aggregate control URI:  The URI used in an RTSP request to refer to
      and control an aggregated session.  It normally, but not always,
      corresponds to the presentation URI specified in the session
      description.  See Section 13.3 for more information.

   Client:  The client is the requester of media service from the media
      server.

   Connection:  A transport-layer virtual circuit established between
      two programs for the purpose of communication.

   Container file:  A file that may contain multiple media streams that
      often constitute a presentation when played together.  The concept
      of a container file is not embedded in the protocol.  However,
      RTSP servers may offer aggregate control on the media streams
      within these files.

   Continuous media:  Data where there is a timing relationship between
      source and sink; that is, the sink needs to reproduce the timing
      relationship that existed at the source.  The most common examples
      of continuous media are audio and motion video.  Continuous media
      can be real time (interactive or conversational), where there is a
      "tight" timing relationship between source and sink or it can be
      streaming where the relationship is less strict.

   Feature tag:  A tag representing a certain set of functionality,
      i.e., a feature.

   IRI:  An Internationalized Resource Identifier is similar to a URI
      but allows characters from the whole Universal Character Set
      (Unicode/ISO 10646), rather than the US-ASCII only.  See [RFC3987]
      for more information.

   Live:  A live presentation or session originates media from an event
      taking place at the same time as the media delivery.  Live
      sessions often have an unbound or only loosely defined duration
      and seek operations may not be possible.

   Media initialization:  The datatype- or codec-specific
      initialization.  This includes such things as clock rates, color
      tables, etc.  Any transport-independent information that is
      required by a client for playback of a media stream occurs in the
      media initialization phase of stream setup.

   Media parameter:  A parameter specific to a media type that may be
      changed before or during stream delivery.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 22]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Media server:  The server providing media-delivery services for one
      or more media streams.  Different media streams within a
      presentation may originate from different media servers.  A media
      server may reside on the same host or on a different host from
      which the presentation is invoked.

   (Media) Stream:  A single media instance, e.g., an audio stream or a
      video stream as well as a single whiteboard or shared application
      group.  When using RTP, a stream consists of all RTP and RTCP
      packets created by a media source within an RTP session.

   Message:  The basic unit of RTSP communication, consisting of a
      structured sequence of octets matching the syntax defined in
      Section 20 and transmitted over a transport between RTSP agents.
      A message is either a request or a response.

   Message body:  The information transferred as the payload of a
      message (request or response).  A message body consists of meta-
      information in the form of message body headers and content in the
      form of an arbitrary number of data octets, as described in
      Section 9.

   Non-aggregated control:  Control of a single media stream.

   Presentation:  A set of one or more streams presented to the client
      as a complete media feed and described by a presentation
      description as defined below.  Presentations with more than one
      media stream are often handled in RTSP under aggregate control.

   Presentation description:  A presentation description contains
      information about one or more media streams within a presentation,
      such as the set of encodings, network addresses, and information
      about the content.  Other IETF protocols, such as SDP ([RFC4566]),
      use the term "session" for a presentation.  The presentation
      description may take several different formats, including but not
      limited to SDP format.

   Response:  An RTSP response to a request.  One type of RTSP message.
      If an HTTP response is meant, it is indicated explicitly.

   Request:  An RTSP request.  One type of RTSP message.  If an HTTP
      request is meant, it is indicated explicitly.

   Request-URI:  The URI used in a request to indicate the resource on
      which the request is to be performed.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 23]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTSP agent:  Either an RTSP client, an RTSP server, or an RTSP proxy.
      In this specification, there are many capabilities that are common
      to these three entities such as the capability to send requests or
      receive responses.  This term will be used when describing
      functionality that is applicable to all three of these entities.

   RTSP session:  A stateful abstraction upon which the main control
      methods of RTSP operate.  An RTSP session is a common context; it
      is created and maintained on a client's request and can be
      destroyed by either the client or server.  It is established by an
      RTSP server upon the completion of a successful SETUP request
      (when a 200 OK response is sent) and is labeled with a session
      identifier at that time.  The session exists until timed out by
      the server or explicitly removed by a TEARDOWN request.  An RTSP
      session is a stateful entity; an RTSP server maintains an explicit
      session state machine (see Appendix B) where most state
      transitions are triggered by client requests.  The existence of a
      session implies the existence of state about the session's media
      streams and their respective transport mechanisms.  A given
      session can have one or more media streams associated with it.  An
      RTSP server uses the session to aggregate control over multiple
      media streams.

   Origin server:  The server on which a given resource resides.

   Seeking:  Requesting playback from a particular point in the content
      time line.

   Transport initialization:  The negotiation of transport information
      (e.g., port numbers, transport protocols) between the client and
      the server.

   URI:  A Universal Resource Identifier; see [RFC3986].  The URIs used
      in RTSP are generally URLs as they give a location for the
      resource.  As URLs are a subset of URIs, they will be referred to
      as URIs to cover also the cases when an RTSP URI would not be a
      URL.

   URL:  A Universal Resource Locator is a URI that identifies the
      resource through its primary access mechanism rather than
      identifying the resource by name or by some other attribute(s) of
      that resource.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 24]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


4.  Protocol Parameters

4.1.  RTSP Version

   This specification defines version 2.0 of RTSP.

   RTSP uses a "<major>.<minor>" numbering scheme to indicate versions
   of the protocol.  The protocol versioning policy is intended to allow
   the sender to indicate the format of a message and its capacity for
   understanding further RTSP communication rather than the features
   obtained via that communication.  No change is made to the version
   number for the addition of message components that do not affect
   communication behavior or that only add to extensible field values.

   The <minor> number is incremented when the changes made to the
   protocol add features that do not change the general message parsing
   algorithm but that may add to the message semantics and imply
   additional capabilities of the sender.  The <major> number is
   incremented when the format of a message within the protocol is
   changed.  The version of an RTSP message is indicated by an RTSP-
   Version field in the first line of the message.  Note that the major
   and minor numbers MUST be treated as separate integers and that each
   MAY be incremented higher than a single digit.  Thus, RTSP/2.4 is a
   lower version than RTSP/2.13, which, in turn, is lower than
   RTSP/12.3.  Leading zeros SHALL NOT be sent and MUST be ignored by
   recipients.

4.2.  RTSP IRI and URI

   RTSP 2.0 defines and registers or updates three URI schemes "rtsp",
   "rtsps", and "rtspu".  The usage of the last, "rtspu", is unspecified
   in RTSP 2.0 and is defined here to register the URI scheme that was
   defined in RTSP 1.0.  The "rtspu" scheme indicates unspecified
   transport of the RTSP messages over unreliable transport means (UDP
   in RTSP 1.0).  An RTSP server MUST respond with an error code
   indicating the "rtspu" scheme is not implemented (501) to a request
   that carries a "rtspu" URI scheme.

   The details of the syntax of "rtsp" and "rtsps" URIs have been
   changed from RTSP 1.0.  These changes include the addition of:

   o  Support for an IPv6 literal in the host part and future IP
      literals through a mechanism defined in [RFC3986].

   o  A new relative format to use in the RTSP elements that is not
      required to start with "/".





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 25]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Neither should have any significant impact on interoperability.  If
   IPv6 literals are needed in the RTSP URI, then that RTSP server must
   be IPv6 capable, and RTSP 1.0 is not a fully IPv6 capable protocol.
   If an RTSP 1.0 client attempts to process the URI, the URI will not
   match the allowed syntax, it will be considered invalid, and
   processing will be stopped.  This is clearly a failure to reach the
   resource; however, it is not a signification issue as RTSP 2.0
   support was needed anyway in both server and client.  Thus, failure
   will only occur in a later step when there is an RTSP version
   mismatch between client and server.  The second change will only
   occur inside RTSP message headers, as the Request-URI must be an
   absolute URI.  Thus, such usages will only occur after an agent has
   accepted and started processing RTSP 2.0 messages, and an agent using
   RTSP 1.0 only will not be required to parse such types of relative
   URIs.

   This specification also defines the format of RTSP IRIs [RFC3987]
   that can be used as RTSP resource identifiers and locators on web
   pages, user interfaces, on paper, etc.  However, the RTSP request
   message format only allows usage of the absolute URI format.  The
   RTSP IRI format MUST use the rules and transformation for IRIs to
   URIs, as defined in [RFC3987].  This allows a URI that matches the
   RTSP 2.0 specification, and so is suitable for use in a request, to
   be created from an RTSP IRI.

   The RTSP IRI and URI are both syntax restricted compared to the
   generic syntax defined in [RFC3986] and [RFC3987]:

   o  An absolute URI requires the authority part; i.e., a host identity
      MUST be provided.

   o  Parameters in the path element are prefixed with the reserved
      separator ";".

   The "scheme" and "host" parts of all URIs [RFC3986] and IRIs
   [RFC3987] are case insensitive.  All other parts of RTSP URIs and
   IRIs are case sensitive, and they MUST NOT be case mapped.

   The fragment identifier is used as defined in Sections 3.5 and 4.3 of
   [RFC3986], i.e., the fragment is to be stripped from the IRI by the
   requester and not included in the Request-URI.  The user agent needs
   to interpret the value of the fragment based on the media type the
   request relates to; i.e., the media type indicated in Content-Type
   header in the response to a DESCRIBE request.

   The syntax of any URI query string is unspecified and responder
   (usually the server) specific.  The query is, from the requester's
   perspective, an opaque string and needs to be handled as such.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 26]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Please note that relative URIs with queries are difficult to handle
   due to the relative URI handling rules of RFC 3986.  Any change of
   the path element using a relative URI results in the stripping of the
   query, which means the relative part needs to contain the query.

   The URI scheme "rtsp" requires that commands be issued via a reliable
   protocol (within the Internet, TCP), while the scheme "rtsps"
   identifies a reliable transport using secure transport (TLS
   [RFC5246]); see Section 19.

   For the scheme "rtsp", if no port number is provided in the authority
   part of the URI, the port number 554 MUST be used.  For the scheme
   "rtsps", if no port number is provided in the authority part of the
   URI port number, the TCP port 322 MUST be used.

   A presentation or a stream is identified by a textual media
   identifier, using the character set and escape conventions of URIs
   [RFC3986].  URIs may refer to a stream or an aggregate of streams;
   i.e., a presentation.  Accordingly, requests described in Section 13
   can apply to either the whole presentation or an individual stream
   within the presentation.  Note that some request methods can only be
   applied to streams, not presentations, and vice versa.

   For example, the RTSP URI:

      rtsp://media.example.com:554/twister/audiotrack

   may identify the audio stream within the presentation "twister",
   which can be controlled via RTSP requests issued over a TCP
   connection to port 554 of host media.example.com.

   Also, the RTSP URI:

      rtsp://media.example.com:554/twister

   identifies the presentation "twister", which may be composed of audio
   and video streams, but could also be something else, such as a random
   media redirector.

      This does not imply a standard way to reference streams in URIs.
      The presentation description defines the hierarchical
      relationships in the presentation and the URIs for the individual
      streams.  A presentation description may name a stream "a.mov" and
      the whole presentation "b.mov".

   The path components of the RTSP URI are opaque to the client and do
   not imply any particular file system structure for the server.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 27]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      This decoupling also allows presentation descriptions to be used
      with non-RTSP media control protocols simply by replacing the
      scheme in the URI.

4.3.  Session Identifiers

   Session identifiers are strings of a length between 8-128 characters.
   A session identifier MUST be generated using methods that make it
   cryptographically random (see [RFC4086]).  It is RECOMMENDED that a
   session identifier contain 128 bits of entropy, i.e., approximately
   22 characters from a high-quality generator (see Section 21).
   However, note that the session identifier does not provide any
   security against session hijacking unless it is kept confidential by
   the client, server, and trusted proxies.

4.4.  Media-Time Formats

   RTSP currently supports three different media-time formats defined
   below.  Additional time formats may be specified in the future.
   These time formats can be used with the Range header (Section 18.40)
   to request playback and specify at which media position protocol
   requests actually will or have taken place.  They are also used in
   description of the media's properties using the Media-Range header
   (Section 18.30).  The unqualified format identifier is used on its
   own in Accept-Ranges header (Section 18.5) to declare supported time
   formats and also in the Range header (Section 18.40) to request the
   time format used in the response.

4.4.1.  SMPTE-Relative Timestamps

   A timestamp may use a format derived from a Society of Motion Picture
   and Television Engineers (SMPTE) specification and expresses time
   offsets anchored at the start of the media clip.  Relative timestamps
   are expressed as SMPTE time codes [SMPTE-TC] for frame-level access
   accuracy.  The time code has the format:

      hours:minutes:seconds:frames.subframes

   with the origin at the start of the clip.  The default SMPTE format
   is "SMPTE 30 drop" format, with a frame rate of 29.97 frames per
   second.  Other SMPTE codes MAY be supported (such as "SMPTE 25")
   through the use of "smpte-type".  For SMPTE 30, the "frames" field in
   the time value can assume the values 0 through 29.  The difference
   between 30 and 29.97 frames per second is handled by dropping the
   first two frame indices (values 00 and 01) of every minute, except
   every tenth minute.  If the frame and the subframe values are zero,
   they may be omitted.  Subframes are measured in hundredths of a
   frame.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 28]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Examples:

     smpte=10:12:33:20-
     smpte=10:07:33-
     smpte=10:07:00-10:07:33:05.01
     smpte-25=10:07:00-10:07:33:05.01

4.4.2.  Normal Play Time

   Normal Play Time (NPT) indicates the stream-absolute position
   relative to the beginning of the presentation.  The timestamp
   consists of two parts: The mandatory first part may be expressed in
   either seconds only or in hours, minutes, and seconds.  The optional
   second part consists of a decimal point and decimal figures and
   indicates fractions of a second.

   The beginning of a presentation corresponds to 0.0 seconds.  Negative
   values are not defined.

   The special constant "now" is defined as the current instant of a
   live event.  It MAY only be used for live events and MUST NOT be used
   for on-demand (i.e., non-live) content.

   NPT is defined as in Digital Storage Media Command and Control
   (DSMb;CC) [ISO.13818-6.1995]:

      Intuitively, NPT is the clock the viewer associates with a
      program.  It is often digitally displayed on a DVD player.  NPT
      advances normally when in normal play mode (scale = 1), advances
      at a faster rate when in fast-scan forward (high positive scale
      ratio), decrements when in scan reverse (negative scale ratio) and
      is fixed in pause mode.  NPT is (logically) equivalent to SMPTE
      time codes.

   Examples:

     npt=123.45-125
     npt=12:05:35.3-
     npt=now-












Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 29]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The syntax is based on ISO 8601 [ISO.8601.2000] and expresses the
   time elapsed since presentation start, with two different notations
   allowed:

   o  The npt-hhmmss notation uses an ISO 8601 extended complete
      representation of the time of the day format (Section 5.3.1.1 of
      [ISO.8601.2000] ) using colons (":") as separators between hours,
      minutes, and seconds (hh:mm:ss).  The hour counter is not limited
      to 0-24 hours; up to nineteen (19) hour digits are allowed.

      *  In accordance with the requirements of the ISO 8601 time
         format, the hours, minutes, and seconds MUST all be present,
         with two digits used for minutes and for seconds and with at
         least two digits for hours.  An NPT of 7 minutes and 0 seconds
         is represented as "00:07:00", and an NPT of 392 hours, 0
         minutes, and 6 seconds is represented as "392:00:06".

      *  RTSP 1.0 allowed NPT in the npt-hhmmss notation without any
         leading zeros to ensure that implementations don't fail; for
         backward compatibility, all RTSP 2.0 implementations are
         REQUIRED to support receiving NPT values, hours, minutes, or
         seconds, without leading zeros.

   o  The npt-sec notation expresses the time in seconds, using between
      one and nineteen (19) digits.

   Both notations allow decimal fractions of seconds as specified in
   Section 5.3.1.3 of [ISO.8601.2000], using at most nine digits, and
   allowing only "." (full stop) as the decimal separator.

   The npt-sec notation is optimized for automatic generation; the npt-
   hhmmss notation is optimized for consumption by human readers.  The
   "now" constant allows clients to request to receive the live feed
   rather than the stored or time-delayed version.  This is needed since
   neither absolute time nor zero time are appropriate for this case.

4.4.3.  Absolute Time

   Absolute time is expressed using a timestamp based on ISO 8601
   [ISO.8601.2000].  The date is a complete representation of the
   calendar date in basic format (YYYYMMDD) without separators (per
   Section 5.2.1.1 of [ISO.8601.2000]).  The time of day is provided in
   the complete representation basic format (hhmmss) as specified in
   Section 5.3.1.1 of [ISO.8601.2000], allowing decimal fractions of
   seconds following Section 5.3.1.3 requiring "." (full stop) as
   decimal separator and limiting the number of digits to no more than
   nine.  The time expressed MUST use UTC (GMT), i.e., no time zone
   offsets are allowed.  The full date and time specification is the



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 30]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   eight-digit date followed by a "T" followed by the six-digit time
   value, optionally followed by a full stop followed by one to nine
   fractions of a second and ended by "Z", e.g., YYYYMMDDThhmmss.ssZ.

      The reasons for this time format rather than using "Date and Time
      on the Internet: Timestamps" [RFC3339] are historic.  We continue
      to use the format specified in RTSP 1.0.  The motivations raised
      in RFC 3339 apply to why a selection from ISO 8601 was made;
      however, a different and even more restrictive selection was
      applied in this case.

   Below are three examples of media time formats, first, a request for
   a clock format range request for a starting time of November 8, 1996
   at 14 h 37 min and 20 1/4 seconds UTC playing for 10 min and 5
   seconds, followed by a Media-Properties header's "Time-Limited" UTC
   property for the 24th of December 2014 at 15 hours and 00 minutes,
   and finally a Terminate-Reason header "time" property for the 18th of
   June 2013 at 16 hours, 12 minutes, and 56 seconds:

     clock=19961108T143720.25Z-19961108T144725.25Z
     Time-Limited=20141224T1500Z
     time=20130618T161256Z

4.5.  Feature Tags

   Feature tags are unique identifiers used to designate features in
   RTSP.  These tags are used in Require (Section 18.43), Proxy-Require
   (Section 18.37), Proxy-Supported (Section 18.38), Supported
   (Section 18.51), and Unsupported (Section 18.55) header fields.

   A feature tag definition MUST indicate which combination of clients,
   servers, or proxies to which it applies.

   The creator of a new RTSP feature tag should either prefix the
   feature tag with a reverse domain name (e.g.,
   "com.example.mynewfeature" is an apt name for a feature whose
   inventor can be reached at "example.com") or register the new feature
   tag with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).  (See
   Section 22, "IANA Considerations".)

   The usage of feature tags is further described in Section 11, which
   deals with capability handling.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 31]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


4.6.  Message Body Tags

   Message body tags are opaque strings that are used to compare two
   message bodies from the same resource, for example, in caches or to
   optimize setup after a redirect.  Message body tags can be carried in
   the MTag header (see Section 18.31) or in SDP (see Appendix D.1.9).
   MTag is similar to ETag in HTTP/1.1 (see Section 3.11 of [RFC2068]).

   A message body tag MUST be unique across all versions of all message
   bodies associated with a particular resource.  A given message body
   tag value MAY be used for message bodies obtained by requests on
   different URIs.  The use of the same message body tag value in
   conjunction with message bodies obtained by requests on different
   URIs does not imply the equivalence of those message bodies.

   Message body tags are used in RTSP to make some methods conditional.
   The methods are made conditional through the inclusion of headers;
   see Section 18.24 and Section 18.26 for information on the If-Match
   and If-None-Match headers, respectively.  Note that RTSP message body
   tags apply to the complete presentation, i.e., both the presentation
   description and the individual media streams.  Thus, message body
   tags can be used to verify at setup time after a redirect that the
   same session description applies to the media at the new location
   using the If-Match header.

4.7.  Media Properties

   When an RTSP server handles media, it is important to consider the
   different properties a media instance for delivery and playback can
   have.  This specification considers the media properties listed below
   in its protocol operations.  They are derived from the differences
   between a number of supported usages.

   On-demand:  Media that has a fixed (given) duration that doesn't
      change during the lifetime of the RTSP session and is known at the
      time of the creation of the session.  It is expected that the
      content of the media will not change, even if the representation,
      such as encoding, or quality, may change.  Generally, one can
      seek, i.e., request any range, within the media.

   Dynamic On-demand:  This is a variation of the on-demand case where
      external methods are used to manipulate the actual content of the
      media setup for the RTSP session.  The main example is content
      defined by a playlist.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 32]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Live:  Live media represents a progressing content stream (such as
      broadcast TV) where the duration may or may not be known.  It is
      not seekable, only the content presently being delivered can be
      accessed.

   Live with Recording:  A live stream that is combined with a server-
      side capability to store and retain the content of the live
      session and allow for random access delivery within the part of
      the already-recorded content.  The actual behavior of the media
      stream is very much dependent on the retention policy for the
      media stream; either the server will be able to capture the
      complete media stream or it will have a limitation in how much
      will be retained.  The media range will dynamically change as the
      session progress.  For servers with a limited amount of storage
      available for recording, there will typically be a sliding window
      that moves forward while new data is made available and older data
      is discarded.

   To cover the above usages, the following media properties with
   appropriate values are specified.

4.7.1.  Random Access and Seeking

   Random access is the ability to specify and get media delivered
   starting from any time (instant) within the content, an operation
   called "seeking".  The Media-Properties header will indicate the
   general capability for a media resource to perform random access.

   Random-Access:  The media is seekable to any out of a large number of
      points within the media.  Due to media-encoding limitations, a
      particular point may not be reachable, but seeking to a point
      close by is enabled.  A floating-point number of seconds may be
      provided to express the worst-case distance between random access
      points.

   Beginning-Only:  Seeking is only possible to the beginning of the
      content.

   No-Seeking:  Seeking is not possible at all.

   If random access is possible, as indicated by the Media-Properties
   header, the actual behavior policy when seeking can be controlled
   using the Seek-Style header (Section 18.47).








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 33]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


4.7.2.  Retention

   The following retention policies are used by media to limit possible
   protocol operations:

   Unlimited:  The media will not be removed as long as the RTSP session
      is in existence.

   Time-Limited:  The media will not be removed before the given
      wallclock time.  After that time, it may or may not be available
      anymore.

   Time-Duration:  The media (on fragment or unit basis) will be
      retained for the specified duration.

4.7.3.  Content Modifications

   The media content and its timeline can be of different types, e.g.
   pre-produced content on demand, a live source that is being generated
   as time progresses, or something that is dynamically altered or
   recomposed during playback.  Therefore, a media property for content
   modifications is needed and the following initial values are defined:

   Immutable:  The content of the media will not change, even if the
      representation, such as encoding or quality changes.

   Dynamic:  The content can change due to external methods or triggers,
      such as playlists, but this will be announced by explicit updates.

   Time-Progressing:  As time progresses, new content will become
      available.  If the content is also retained, it will become longer
      as everything between the start point and the point currently
      being made available can be accessed.  If the media server uses a
      sliding-window policy for retention, the start point will also
      change as time progresses.

4.7.4.  Supported Scale Factors

   A particular media content item often supports only a limited set or
   range of scales when delivering the media.  To enable the client to
   know what values or ranges of scale operations that the whole content
   or the current position supports, a media properties attribute for
   this is defined that contains a list with the values or ranges that
   are supported.  The attribute is named "Scales".  The "Scales"
   attribute may be updated at any point in the content due to content
   consisting of spliced pieces or content being dynamically updated by
   out-of-band mechanisms.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 34]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


4.7.5.  Mapping to the Attributes

   This section shows examples of how one would map the above usages to
   the properties and their values.

   Example of On-Demand:
      Random Access: Random-Access=5.0, Content Modifications:
      Immutable, Retention: Unlimited or Time-Limited.

   Example of Dynamic On-Demand:
      Random Access: Random-Access=3.0, Content Modifications: Dynamic,
      Retention: Unlimited or Time-Limited.

   Example of Live:
      Random Access: No-Seeking, Content Modifications: Time-
      Progressing, Retention: Time-Duration=0.0

   Example of Live with Recording:
      Random Access: Random-Access=3.0, Content Modifications: Time-
      Progressing, Retention: Time-Duration=7200.0

5.  RTSP Message

   RTSP is a text-based protocol that uses the ISO 10646 character set
   in UTF-8 encoding per RFC 3629 [RFC3629].  Lines MUST be terminated
   by a CRLF.

      Text-based protocols make it easier to add optional parameters in
      a self-describing manner.  Since the number of parameters and the
      frequency of commands is low, processing efficiency is not a
      concern.  Text-based protocols, if used carefully, also allow easy
      implementation of research prototypes in scripting languages such
      as Python, PHP, Perl and TCL.

   The ISO 10646 character set avoids character-set switching, but is
   invisible to the application as long as US-ASCII is being used.  This
   is also the encoding used for text fields in RTCP [RFC3550].

   A request contains a method, the object the method is operating upon,
   and parameters to further describe the method.  Methods are
   idempotent unless otherwise noted.  Methods are also designed to
   require little or no state maintenance at the media server.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 35]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


5.1.  Message Types

   RTSP messages are either requests from client to server or from
   server to client, and responses in the reverse direction.  Request
   (Section 7) and response (Section 8) messages use a format based on
   the generic message format of RFC 5322 [RFC5322] for transferring
   bodies (the payload of the message).  Both types of messages consist
   of a start-line, zero or more header fields (also known as
   "headers"), an empty line (i.e., a line with nothing preceding the
   CRLF) indicating the end of the headers, and possibly the data of the
   message body.  The ABNF [RFC5234] below is for illustration only; the
   formal message specification is presented in Section 20.2.2.

   generic-message = start-line
                   *(rtsp-header CRLF)
                     CRLF
                   [ message-body-data ]
   start-line = Request-Line / Status-Line

   In the interest of robustness, agents MUST ignore any empty line(s)
   received where a Request-Line or Status-Line is expected.  In other
   words, if the agent is reading the protocol stream at the beginning
   of a message and receives any number of CRLFs first, it MUST ignore
   all of the CRLFs.

5.2.  Message Headers

   RTSP header fields (see Section 18) include general-header, request-
   header, response-header, and message body header fields.

   The order in which header fields with differing field names are
   received is not significant.  However, it is "good practice" to send
   general-header fields first, followed by a request-header or
   response-header field, and ending with the message body header
   fields.

   Multiple header fields with the same field-name MAY be present in a
   message if and only if the entire field-value for that header field
   is defined as a comma-separated list.  It MUST be possible to combine
   the multiple header fields into one "field-name: field-value" pair,
   without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each
   subsequent field-value to the first, each separated by a comma.  The
   order in which header fields with the same field-name are received is
   therefore significant to the interpretation of the combined field
   value; thus, a proxy MUST NOT change the order of these field-values
   when a message is forwarded.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 36]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Unknown message headers MUST be ignored (skipping over the header to
   the next protocol element, and not causing an error) by an RTSP
   server or client.  An RTSP proxy MUST forward unknown message
   headers.  Message headers defined outside of this specification that
   are required to be interpreted by the RTSP agent will need to use
   feature tags (Section 4.5) and include them in the appropriate
   Require (Section 18.43) or Proxy-Require (Section 18.37) header.

5.3.  Message Body

   The message body (if any) of an RTSP message is used to carry further
   information for a particular resource associated with the request or
   response.  An example of a message body is an SDP message.

   The presence of a message body in either a request or a response MUST
   be signaled by the inclusion of a Content-Length header (see
   Section 18.17) and Content-Type header (see Section 18.19).  A
   message body MUST NOT be included in a request or response if the
   specification of the particular method (see Method Definitions
   (Section 13)) does not allow sending a message body.  In case a
   message body is received in a message when not expected, the message
   body data SHOULD be discarded.  This is to allow future extensions to
   define optional use of a message body.

5.4.  Message Length

   An RTSP message that does not contain any message body is terminated
   by the first empty line after the header fields (note: an empty line
   is a line with nothing preceding the CRLF.).  In RTSP messages that
   contain message bodies, the empty line is followed by the message
   body.  The length of that body is determined by the value of the
   Content-Length header (Section 18.17).  The value in the header
   represents the length of the message body in octets.  If this header
   field is not present, a value of zero is assumed, i.e., no message
   body present in the message.  Unlike an HTTP message, an RTSP message
   MUST contain a Content-Length header whenever it contains a message
   body.  Note that RTSP does not support the HTTP/1.1 "chunked"
   transfer coding (see Section 4.1 of [RFC7230]).

      Given the moderate length of presentation descriptions returned,
      the server should always be able to determine its length, even if
      it is generated dynamically, making the chunked transfer encoding
      unnecessary.

6.  General-Header Fields

   General headers are headers that may be used in both requests and
   responses.  The general-headers are listed in Table 1:



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 37]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


                  +--------------------+----------------+
                  | Header Name        | Defined in     |
                  +--------------------+----------------+
                  | Accept-Ranges      | Section 18.5   |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Cache-Control      | Section 18.11  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Connection         | Section 18.12  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | CSeq               | Section 18.20  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Date               | Section 18.21  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Media-Properties   | Section 18.29  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Media-Range        | Section 18.30  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Pipelined-Requests | Section 18.33  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Proxy-Supported    | Section 18.38  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Range              | Section 18.40  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | RTP-Info           | Section 18.45  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Scale              | Section 18.46  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Seek-Style         | Section 18.47  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Server             | Section 18.48  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Session            | Section 18.49  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Speed              | Section 18.50  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Supported          | Section 18.51  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Timestamp          | Section 18.53  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Transport          | Section 18.54  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | User-Agent         | Section 18.56  |
                  |                    |                |
                  | Via                | Section 18.57  |
                  +--------------------+----------------+

                 Table 1: The General Headers Used in RTSP




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 38]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


7.  Request

   A request message uses the format outlined below regardless of the
   direction of a request, whether client to server or server to client:

   o  Request line, containing the method to be applied to the resource,
      the identifier of the resource, and the protocol version in use;

   o  Zero or more Header lines, which can be of the following types:
      general-headers (Section 6), request-headers (Section 7.2), or
      message body headers (Section 9.1);

   o  One empty line (CRLF) to indicate the end of the header section;

   o  Optionally, a message body, consisting of one or more lines.  The
      length of the message body in octets is indicated by the Content-
      Length message header.


































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 39]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


7.1.  Request Line

   The request line provides the key information about the request: what
   method, on what resources, and using which RTSP version.  The methods
   that are defined by this specification are listed in Table 2.

                    +---------------+----------------+
                    | Method        | Defined in     |
                    +---------------+----------------+
                    | DESCRIBE      | Section 13.2   |
                    |               |                |
                    | GET_PARAMETER | Section 13.8   |
                    |               |                |
                    | OPTIONS       | Section 13.1   |
                    |               |                |
                    | PAUSE         | Section 13.6   |
                    |               |                |
                    | PLAY          | Section 13.4   |
                    |               |                |
                    | PLAY_NOTIFY   | Section 13.5   |
                    |               |                |
                    | REDIRECT      | Section 13.10  |
                    |               |                |
                    | SETUP         | Section 13.3   |
                    |               |                |
                    | SET_PARAMETER | Section 13.9   |
                    |               |                |
                    | TEARDOWN      | Section 13.7   |
                    +---------------+----------------+

                         Table 2: The RTSP Methods

   The syntax of the RTSP request line has the following:

      <Method> SP <Request-URI> SP <RTSP-Version> CRLF

   Note: This syntax cannot be freely changed in future versions of
   RTSP.  This line needs to remain parsable by older RTSP
   implementations since it indicates the RTSP version of the message.

   In contrast to HTTP/1.1 [RFC7230], RTSP requests identify the
   resource through an absolute RTSP URI (including scheme, host, and
   port) (see Section 4.2) rather than just the absolute path.

      HTTP/1.1 requires servers to understand the absolute URI, but
      clients are supposed to use the Host request-header.  This is
      purely needed for backward compatibility with HTTP/1.0 servers, a
      consideration that does not apply to RTSP.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 40]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   An asterisk "*" can be used instead of an absolute URI in the
   Request-URI part to indicate that the request does not apply to a
   particular resource but to the server or proxy itself, and is only
   allowed when the request method does not necessarily apply to a
   resource.

   For example:

      OPTIONS * RTSP/2.0

   An OPTIONS in this form will determine the capabilities of the server
   or the proxy that first receives the request.  If the capability of
   the specific server needs to be determined, without regard to the
   capability of an intervening proxy, the server should be addressed
   explicitly with an absolute URI that contains the server's address.

   For example:

      OPTIONS rtsp://example.com RTSP/2.0
































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 41]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


7.2.  Request-Header Fields

   The RTSP headers in Table 3 can be included in a request, as request-
   headers, to modify the specifics of the request.

                 +---------------------+----------------+
                 | Header              | Defined in     |
                 +---------------------+----------------+
                 | Accept              | Section 18.1   |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Accept-Credentials  | Section 18.2   |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Accept-Encoding     | Section 18.3   |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Accept-Language     | Section 18.4   |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Authorization       | Section 18.8   |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Bandwidth           | Section 18.9   |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Blocksize           | Section 18.10  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | From                | Section 18.23  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | If-Match            | Section 18.24  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | If-Modified-Since   | Section 18.25  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | If-None-Match       | Section 18.26  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Notify-Reason       | Section 18.32  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Proxy-Authorization | Section 18.36  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Proxy-Require       | Section 18.37  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Referrer            | Section 18.41  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Request-Status      | Section 18.42  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Require             | Section 18.43  |
                 |                     |                |
                 | Terminate-Reason    | Section 18.52  |
                 +---------------------+----------------+

                     Table 3: The RTSP Request-Headers

   Detailed header definitions are provided in Section 18.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 42]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   New request-headers may be defined.  If the receiver of the request
   is required to understand the request-header, the request MUST
   include a corresponding feature tag in a Require or Proxy-Require
   header to ensure the processing of the header.

8.  Response

   After receiving and interpreting a request message, the recipient
   responds with an RTSP response message.  Normally, there is only one,
   final, response.  Responses using the response code class 1xx is the
   only class for which there MAY be sent one or more responses prior to
   the final response message.

   The valid response codes and the methods they can be used with are
   listed in Table 4.

8.1.  Status-Line

   The first line of a response message is the Status-Line, consisting
   of the protocol version followed by a numeric status code and the
   textual phrase associated with the status code, with each element
   separated by SP characters.  No CR or LF is allowed except in the
   final CRLF sequence.

   <RTSP-Version> SP <Status-Code> SP <Reason Phrase> CRLF

8.1.1.  Status Code and Reason Phrase

   The Status-Code element is a 3-digit integer result code of the
   attempt to understand and satisfy the request.  These codes are fully
   defined in Section 17.  The reason phrase is intended to give a short
   textual description of the Status-Code.  The Status-Code is intended
   for use by automata and the reason phrase is intended for the human
   user.  The client is not required to examine or display the reason
   phrase.

   The first digit of the Status-Code defines the class of response.
   The last two digits do not have any categorization role.  There are
   five values for the first digit:

   1xx:  Informational - Request received, continuing process

   2xx:  Success - The action was successfully received, understood, and
         accepted

   3rr:  Redirection - Further action needs to be taken in order to
         complete the request (3rr rather than 3xx is used as 304 is
         excluded; see Section 17.3)



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 43]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   4xx:  Client Error - The request contains bad syntax or cannot be
         fulfilled

   5xx:  Server Error - The server failed to fulfill an apparently valid
         request

   The individual values of the numeric status codes defined for RTSP
   2.0, and an example set of corresponding reason phrases, are
   presented in Table 4.  The reason phrases listed here are only
   recommended; they may be replaced by local equivalents without
   affecting the protocol.  Note that RTSP adopted most HTTP/1.1
   [RFC2068] status codes and then added RTSP-specific status codes
   starting at x50 to avoid conflicts with future HTTP status codes that
   are desirable to import into RTSP.  All these codes are RTSP specific
   and RTSP has its own registry separate from HTTP for status codes.

   RTSP status codes are extensible.  RTSP applications are not required
   to understand the meaning of all registered status codes, though such
   understanding is obviously desirable.  However, applications MUST
   understand the class of any status code, as indicated by the first
   digit, and treat any unrecognized response as being equivalent to the
   x00 status code of that class, with an exception for unknown 3xx
   codes, which MUST be treated as a 302 (Found).  The reason for that
   exception is that the status code 300 (Multiple Choices in HTTP) is
   not defined for RTSP.  A response with an unrecognized status code
   MUST NOT be cached.  For example, if an unrecognized status code of
   431 is received by the client, it can safely assume that there was
   something wrong with its request and treat the response as if it had
   received a 400 status code.  In such cases, user agents SHOULD
   present to the user the message body returned with the response,
   since that message body is likely to include human-readable
   information that will explain the unusual status.

   +------+---------------------------------+--------------------------+
   | Code | Reason                          | Method                   |
   +------+---------------------------------+--------------------------+
   | 100  | Continue                        | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 200  | OK                              | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 301  | Moved Permanently               | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 302  | Found                           | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 303  | See Other                       | n/a                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 304  | Not Modified                    | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 44]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   | 305  | Use Proxy                       | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 400  | Bad Request                     | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 401  | Unauthorized                    | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 402  | Payment Required                | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 403  | Forbidden                       | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 404  | Not Found                       | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 405  | Method Not Allowed              | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 406  | Not Acceptable                  | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 407  | Proxy Authentication Required   | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 408  | Request Timeout                 | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 410  | Gone                            | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 412  | Precondition Failed             | DESCRIBE, SETUP          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 413  | Request Message Body Too Large  | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 414  | Request-URI Too Long            | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 415  | Unsupported Media Type          | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 451  | Parameter Not Understood        | SET_PARAMETER,           |
   |      |                                 | GET_PARAMETER            |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 452  | reserved                        | n/a                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 453  | Not Enough Bandwidth            | SETUP                    |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 454  | Session Not Found               | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 455  | Method Not Valid in This State  | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 456  | Header Field Not Valid for      | all                      |
   |      | Resource                        |                          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 457  | Invalid Range                   | PLAY, PAUSE              |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 458  | Parameter Is Read-Only          | SET_PARAMETER            |
   |      |                                 |                          |



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 45]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   | 459  | Aggregate Operation Not Allowed | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 460  | Only Aggregate Operation        | all                      |
   |      | Allowed                         |                          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 461  | Unsupported Transport           | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 462  | Destination Unreachable         | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 463  | Destination Prohibited          | SETUP                    |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 464  | Data Transport Not Ready Yet    | PLAY                     |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 465  | Notification Reason Unknown     | PLAY_NOTIFY              |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 466  | Key Management Error            | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 470  | Connection Authorization        | all                      |
   |      | Required                        |                          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 471  | Connection Credentials Not      | all                      |
   |      | Accepted                        |                          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 472  | Failure to Establish Secure     | all                      |
   |      | Connection                      |                          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 500  | Internal Server Error           | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 501  | Not Implemented                 | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 502  | Bad Gateway                     | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 503  | Service Unavailable             | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 504  | Gateway Timeout                 | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 505  | RTSP Version Not Supported      | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 551  | Option Not Supported            | all                      |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   | 553  | Proxy Unavailable               | all                      |
   +------+---------------------------------+--------------------------+

          Table 4: Status Codes and Their Usage with RTSP Methods







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 46]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


8.2.  Response Headers

   The response-headers allow the request recipient to pass additional
   information about the response that cannot be placed in the Status-
   Line.  This header gives information about the server and about
   further access to the resource identified by the Request-URI.  All
   headers currently classified as response-headers are listed in
   Table 5.

                +------------------------+----------------+
                | Header                 | Defined in     |
                +------------------------+----------------+
                | Authentication-Info    | Section 18.7   |
                |                        |                |
                | Connection-Credentials | Section 18.13  |
                |                        |                |
                | Location               | Section 18.28  |
                |                        |                |
                | MTag                   | Section 18.31  |
                |                        |                |
                | Proxy-Authenticate     | Section 18.34  |
                |                        |                |
                | Public                 | Section 18.39  |
                |                        |                |
                | Retry-After            | Section 18.44  |
                |                        |                |
                | Unsupported            | Section 18.55  |
                |                        |                |
                | WWW-Authenticate       | Section 18.58  |
                +------------------------+----------------+

                    Table 5: The RTSP Response Headers

   Response-header names can be extended reliably only in combination
   with a change in the protocol version.  However, the usage of feature
   tags in the request allows the responding party to learn the
   capability of the receiver of the response.  A new or experimental
   header can be given the semantics of response-header if all parties
   in the communication recognize them to be a response-header.
   Unrecognized headers in responses MUST be ignored.

9.  Message Body

   Some request and response messages include a message body, if not
   otherwise restricted by the request method or response status code.
   The message body consists of the content data itself (see also
   Section 5.3).




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 47]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The SET_PARAMETER and GET_PARAMETER requests and responses, and the
   DESCRIBE response as defined by this specification, can have a
   message body; the purpose of the message body is defined in each
   case.  All 4xx and 5xx responses MAY also have a message body to
   carry additional response information.  Generally, a message body MAY
   be attached to any RTSP 2.0 request or response, but the content of
   the message body MAY be ignored by the receiver.  Extensions to this
   specification can specify the purpose and content of message bodies,
   including requiring their inclusion.

   In this section, both sender and recipient refer to either the client
   or the server, depending on who sends and who receives the message
   body.

9.1.  Message Body Header Fields

   Message body header fields define meta-information about the content
   data in the message body.  The message body header fields are listed
   in Table 6.

                   +------------------+----------------+
                   | Header           | Defined in     |
                   +------------------+----------------+
                   | Allow            | Section 18.6   |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Content-Base     | Section 18.14  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Content-Encoding | Section 18.15  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Content-Language | Section 18.16  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Content-Length   | Section 18.17  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Content-Location | Section 18.18  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Content-Type     | Section 18.19  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Expires          | Section 18.22  |
                   |                  |                |
                   | Last-Modified    | Section 18.27  |
                   +------------------+----------------+

                  Table 6: The RTSP Message Body Headers








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 48]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The extension-header mechanism allows additional message body header
   fields to be defined without changing the protocol, but these fields
   cannot be assumed to be recognizable by the recipient.  Unrecognized
   header fields MUST be ignored by the recipient and forwarded by
   proxies.

9.2.  Message Body

   An RTSP message with a message body MUST include the Content-Type and
   Content-Length headers.  When a message body is included with a
   message, the data type of that content data is determined via the
   Content-Type and Content-Encoding header fields.

   Content-Type specifies the media type of the underlying data.  There
   is no default media format and the actual format used in the body is
   required to be explicitly stated in the Content-Type header.  By
   being explicit and always requiring the inclusion of the Content-Type
   header with accurate information, one avoids the many pitfalls in a
   heuristic-based interpretation of the body content.  The user
   experience of HTTP and email have suffered from relying on such
   heuristics.

   Content-Encoding may be used to indicate any additional content-
   codings applied to the data, usually for the purpose of data
   compression, that are a property of the requested resource.  The
   default encoding is 'identity', i.e. no transformation of the message
   body.

   The Content-Length of a message is the length of the content,
   measured in octets.

9.3.  Message Body Format Negotiation

   The content format of the message body is provided using the Content-
   Type header (Section 18.19).  To enable the responder of a request to
   determine which media type it should use, the requester may include
   the Accept header (Section 18.1) in a request to identify supported
   media types or media type ranges suitable to the response.  In case
   the responder is not supporting any of the specified formats, then
   the request response will be a 406 (Not Acceptable) error code.

   The media types that may be used on requests with message bodies need
   to be determined through the use of feature tags, specification
   requirement, or trial and error.  Trial and error works because when
   the responder does not support the media type of the message body, it
   will respond with a 415 (Unsupported Media Type).





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 49]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The formats supported and their negotiation is done individually on a
   per method and direction (request or response body) direction.
   Requirements on supporting particular media types for use as message
   bodies in requests and response SHALL also be specified on a per-
   method and per-direction basis.

10.  Connections

   RTSP messages are transferred between RTSP agents and proxies using a
   transport connection.  This transport connection uses TCP or TCP/TLS.
   This transport connection is referred to as the "connection" or "RTSP
   connection" within this document.

   RTSP requests can be transmitted using the two different connection
   scenarios listed below:

   o  persistent - a transport connection is used for several request/
      response transactions;

   o  transient - a transport connection is used for each single
      request/response transaction.

   RFC 2326 attempted to specify an optional mechanism for transmitting
   RTSP messages in connectionless mode over a transport protocol such
   as UDP.  However, it was not specified in sufficient detail to allow
   for interoperable implementations.  In an attempt to reduce
   complexity and scope, and due to lack of interest, RTSP 2.0 does not
   attempt to define a mechanism for supporting RTSP over UDP or other
   connectionless transport protocols.  A side effect of this is that
   RTSP requests MUST NOT be sent to multicast groups since no
   connection can be established with a specific receiver in multicast
   environments.

   Certain RTSP headers, such as the CSeq header (Section 18.20), which
   may appear to be relevant only to connectionless transport scenarios,
   are still retained and MUST be implemented according to this
   specification.  In the case of CSeq, it is quite useful for matching
   responses to requests if the requests are pipelined (see Section 12).
   It is also useful in proxies for keeping track of the different
   requests when aggregating several client requests on a single TCP
   connection.

10.1.  Reliability and Acknowledgements

   Since RTSP messages are transmitted using reliable transport
   protocols, they MUST NOT be retransmitted at the RTSP level.
   Instead, the implementation must rely on the underlying transport to




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 50]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   provide reliability.  The RTSP implementation may use any indication
   of reception acknowledgment of the message from the underlying
   transport protocols to optimize the RTSP behavior.

      If both the underlying reliable transport, such as TCP, and the
      RTSP application retransmit requests, each packet loss or message
      loss may result in two retransmissions.  The receiver typically
      cannot take advantage of the application-layer retransmission
      since the transport stack will not deliver the application-layer
      retransmission before the first attempt has reached the receiver.
      If the packet loss is caused by congestion, multiple
      retransmissions at different layers will exacerbate the
      congestion.

   Lack of acknowledgment of an RTSP request should be handled within
   the constraints of the connection timeout considerations described
   below (Section 10.4).

10.2.  Using Connections

   A TCP transport can be used for both persistent connections (for
   several message exchanges) and transient connections (for a single
   message exchange).  Implementations of this specification MUST
   support RTSP over TCP.  The scheme of the RTSP URI (Section 4.2)
   allows the client to specify the port it will contact the server on,
   and defines the default port to use if one is not explicitly given.

   In addition to the registered default ports, i.e., 554 (rtsp) and 322
   (rtsps), there is an alternative port 8554 registered.  This port may
   provide some benefits over non-registered ports if an RTSP server is
   unable to use the default ports.  The benefits may include
   preconfigured security policies as well as classifiers in network
   monitoring tools.

   An RTSP client opening a TCP connection to access a particular
   resource as identified by a URI uses the IP address and port derived
   from the host and port parts of the URI.  The IP address is either
   the explicit address provided in the URI or any of the addresses
   provided when performing A and AAAA record DNS lookups of the
   hostname in the URI.

   A server MUST handle both persistent and transient connections.

      Transient connections facilitate mechanisms for fault tolerance.
      They also allow for application-layer mobility.  A server-and-
      client pair that supports transient connections can survive the





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 51]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      loss of a TCP connection; e.g., due to a NAT timeout.  When the
      client has discovered that the TCP connection has been lost, it
      can set up a new one when there is need to communicate again.

   A persistent connection is RECOMMENDED to be used for all
   transactions between the server and client, including messages for
   multiple RTSP sessions.  However, a persistent connection MAY be
   closed after a few message exchanges.  For example, a client may use
   a persistent connection for the initial SETUP and PLAY message
   exchanges in a session and then close the connection.  Later, when
   the client wishes to send a new request, such as a PAUSE for the
   session, a new connection would be opened.  This connection may be
   either transient or persistent.

   An RTSP agent MAY use one connection to handle multiple RTSP sessions
   on the same server.  The RTSP agent SHALL NOT use more than one
   connection per RTSP session at any given point.

      Having only one connection in use at any time avoids confusion
      regarding on which connection any server-to-client requests shall
      be sent.  Using a single connection for multiple RTSP sessions
      also saves complexity by enabling the server to maintain less
      state about its connection resources on the server.  Not using
      more than one connection at a time for a particular RTSP session
      avoids wasting connection resources and allows the server to track
      only the most recently used client-to-server connection for each
      RTSP session as being the currently valid server-to-client
      connection.

   RTSP allows a server to send requests to a client.  However, this can
   be supported only if a client establishes a persistent connection
   with the server.  In cases where a persistent connection does not
   exist between a server and its client, due to the lack of a signaling
   channel, the server may be forced to silently discard RTSP messages,
   and it may even drop an RTSP session without notifying the client.
   An example of such a case is when the server desires to send a
   REDIRECT request for an RTSP session to the client but is not able to
   do so because it cannot reach the client.  A server that attempts to
   send a request to a client that has no connection currently to the
   server SHALL discard the request.

      Without a persistent connection between the client and the server,
      the media server has no reliable way of reaching the client.
      Because of the likely failure of server-to-client established
      connections, the server will not even attempt establishing any
      connection.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 52]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      Queuing of server-to-client requests has been considered.
      However, a security issue exists as to how it might be possible to
      authorize a client establishing a new connection as being a
      legitimate receiver of a request related to a particular RTSP
      session, without the client first issuing requests related to the
      pending request.  Thus, it would be likely to make any such
      requests even more delayed and less useful.

   The sending of client and server requests can be asynchronous events.
   To avoid deadlock situations, both client and server MUST be able to
   send and receive requests simultaneously.  As an RTSP response may be
   queued up for transmission, reception or processing behind the peer
   RTSP agent's own requests, all RTSP agents are required to have a
   certain capability of handling outstanding messages.  A potential
   issue is that outstanding requests may time out despite being
   processed by the peer; this can be due to the response being caught
   in the queue behind a number of requests that the RTSP agent is
   processing but that take some time to complete.  To avoid this
   problem, an RTSP agent should buffer incoming messages locally so
   that any response messages can be processed immediately upon
   reception.  If responses are separated from requests and directly
   forwarded for processing, not only can the result be used
   immediately, the state associated with that outstanding request can
   also be released.  However, buffering a number of requests on the
   receiving RTSP agent consumes resources and enables a resource
   exhaustion attack on the agent.  Therefore, this buffer should be
   limited so that an unreasonable number of requests or total message
   size is not allowed to consume the receiving agent's resources.  In
   most APIs, having the receiving agent stop reading from the TCP
   socket will result in TCP's window being clamped, thus forcing the
   buffering onto the sending agent when the load is larger than
   expected.  However, as both RTSP message sizes and frequency may be
   changed in the future by protocol extensions, an agent should be
   careful about taking harsher measurements against a potential attack.
   When under attack, an RTSP agent can close TCP connections and
   release state associated with that TCP connection.

   To provide some guidance on what is reasonable, the following
   guidelines are given.  It is RECOMMENDED that:

   o  an RTSP agent should not have more than 10 outstanding requests
      per RTSP session;

   o  an RTSP agent should not have more than 10 outstanding requests
      that are not related to an RTSP session or that are requesting to
      create an RTSP session.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 53]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   In light of the above, it is RECOMMENDED that clients use persistent
   connections whenever possible.  A client that supports persistent
   connections MAY "pipeline" its requests (see Section 12).

   RTSP agents can send requests to multiple different destinations,
   either server or client contexts over the same connection to a proxy.
   Then, the proxy forks the message to the different destinations over
   proxy-to-agent connections.  In these cases when multiple requests
   are outstanding, the requesting agent MUST be ready to receive the
   responses out of order compared to the order they where sent on the
   connection.  The order between multiple messages for each destination
   will be maintained; however, the order between response from
   different destinations can be different.

      The reason for this is to avoid a head-of-line blocking situation.
      In a sequence of requests, an early outstanding request may take
      time to be processed at one destination.  Simultaneously, a
      response from any other destination that was later in the sequence
      of requests may have arrived at the proxy; thus, allowing out-of-
      order responses avoids forcing the proxy to buffer this response
      and instead deliver it as soon as possible.  Note, this will not
      affect the order in which the messages sent to each separate
      destination were processed at the request destination.

   This scenario can occur in two cases involving proxies.  The first is
   a client issuing requests for sessions on different servers using a
   common client-to-proxy connection.  The second is for server-to-
   client requests, like REDIRECT being sent by the server over a common
   transport connection the proxy created for its different connecting
   clients.

10.3.  Closing Connections

   The client MAY close a connection at any point when no outstanding
   request/response transactions exist for any RTSP session being
   managed through the connection.  The server, however, SHOULD NOT
   close a connection until all RTSP sessions being managed through the
   connection have been timed out (Section 18.49).  A server SHOULD NOT
   close a connection immediately after responding to a session-level
   TEARDOWN request for the last RTSP session being controlled through
   the connection.  Instead, the server should wait for a reasonable
   amount of time for the client to receive and act upon the TEARDOWN









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 54]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   response and then initiate the connection closing.  The server SHOULD
   wait at least 10 seconds after sending the TEARDOWN response before
   closing the connection.

      This is to ensure that the client has time to issue a SETUP for a
      new session on the existing connection after having torn the last
      one down.  Ten seconds should give the client ample opportunity to
      get its message to the server.

   A server SHOULD NOT close the connection directly as a result of
   responding to a request with an error code.

      Certain error responses such as 460 (Only Aggregate Operation
      Allowed) (Section 17.4.24) are used for negotiating capabilities
      of a server with respect to content or other factors.  In such
      cases, it is inefficient for the server to close a connection on
      an error response.  Also, such behavior would prevent
      implementation of advanced or special types of requests or result
      in extra overhead for the client when testing for new features.
      On the other hand, keeping connections open after sending an error
      response poses a Denial-of-Service (DoS) security risk
      (Section 21).

   The server MAY close a connection if it receives an incomplete
   message and if the message is not completed within a reasonable
   amount of time.  It is RECOMMENDED that the server wait at least 10
   seconds for the completion of a message or for the next part of the
   message to arrive (which is an indication that the transport and the
   client are still alive).  Servers believing they are under attack or
   that are otherwise starved for resources during that event MAY
   consider using a shorter timeout.

   If a server closes a connection while the client is attempting to
   send a new request, the client will have to close its current
   connection, establish a new connection, and send its request over the
   new connection.

   An RTSP message SHOULD NOT be terminated by closing the connection.
   Such a message MAY be considered to be incomplete by the receiver and
   discarded.  An RTSP message is properly terminated as defined in
   Section 5.










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 55]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


10.4.  Timing Out Connections and RTSP Messages

   Receivers of a request (responders) SHOULD respond to requests in a
   timely manner even when a reliable transport such as TCP is used.
   Similarly, the sender of a request (requester) SHOULD wait for a
   sufficient time for a response before concluding that the responder
   will not be acting upon its request.

   A responder SHOULD respond to all requests within 5 seconds.  If the
   responder recognizes that the processing of a request will take
   longer than 5 seconds, it SHOULD send a 100 (Continue) response as
   soon as possible.  It SHOULD continue sending a 100 response every 5
   seconds thereafter until it is ready to send the final response to
   the requester.  After sending a 100 response, the responder MUST send
   a final response indicating the success or failure of the request.

   A requester SHOULD wait at least 10 seconds for a response before
   concluding that the responder will not be responding to its request.
   After receiving a 100 response, the requester SHOULD continue waiting
   for further responses.  If more than 10 seconds elapse without
   receiving any response, the requester MAY assume that the responder
   is unresponsive and abort the connection by closing the TCP
   connection.

   In some cases, multiple RTSP sessions share the same transport
   connection; abandoning a request and closing the connection may have
   significant impact on those other sessions.  First of all, other RTSP
   requests may have become queued up due to the request taking a long
   time to process.  Secondly, those sessions also lose the possibility
   to receive server-to-client requests.  To mitigate that situation,
   the RTSP client or server SHOULD establish a new connection and send
   any requests that are queued up or that haven't received a response
   on this new connection.  Thirdly, to ensure that the RTSP server
   knows which connection is valid for a particular RTSP session, the
   RTSP agent SHOULD send a keep-alive request, if no other request will
   be sent immediately for that RTSP session, for each RTSP session on
   the old connection.  The keep-alive request will normally be a
   SET_PARAMETER with a session header to inform the server that this
   agent cares about this RTSP session.

   A requester SHOULD wait longer than 10 seconds for a response if it
   is experiencing significant transport delays on its connection to the
   responder.  The requester is capable of determining the Round-Trip
   Time (RTT) of the request/response cycle using the Timestamp header
   (Section 18.53) in any RTSP request.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 56]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      The 10-second wait was chosen for the following reasons.  It gives
      TCP time to perform a couple of retransmissions, even if operating
      on default values.  It is short enough that users may not abandon
      the process themselves.  However, it should be noted that 10
      seconds can be aggressive on certain types of networks.  The
      5-second value for 1xx messages is half the timeout giving a
      reasonable chance of successful delivery before timeout happens on
      the requester side.

10.5.  Showing Liveness

   RTSP requires the client to periodically show its liveness to the
   server or the server may terminate any session state.  Several
   different protocol mechanism include in their usage a liveness proof
   from the client.  These mechanisms are RTSP requests with a Session
   header to the server; if RTP & RTCP is used for media data transport
   and the transport is established, the RTCP message proves liveness;
   or through any other used media-transport protocol capable of
   indicating liveness of the RTSP client.  It is RECOMMENDED that a
   client not wait to the last second of the timeout before trying to
   send a liveness message.  The RTSP message may take some time to
   arrive safely at the receiver, due to packet loss and TCP
   retransmissions.  To show liveness between RTSP requests being issued
   to accomplish other things, the following mechanisms can be used, in
   descending order of preference:

   RTCP: If RTP is used for media transport, RTCP SHOULD be used.  If
         RTCP is used to report transport statistics, it will
         necessarily also function as a keep-alive.  The server can
         determine the client by network address and port together with
         the fact that the client is reporting on the server's RTP
         sender sources (synchronization source (SSRCs)).  A downside of
         using RTCP is that it only gives statistical guarantees of
         reaching the server.  However, the probability of a false
         client timeout is so low that it can be ignored in most cases.
         For example, assume a session with a 60-second timeout and
         enough bitrate assigned to RTCP messages to send a message from
         client to server on average every 5 seconds.  That client has,
         for a network with 5% packet loss, a probability of failing to
         confirm liveness within the timeout interval for that session
         of 2.4*E-16.  Sessions with shorter timeouts, much higher
         packet loss, or small RTCP bandwidths SHOULD also implement one
         or more of the mechanisms below.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 57]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   SET_PARAMETER:  When using SET_PARAMETER for keep-alives, a body
         SHOULD NOT be included.  This method is the RECOMMENDED RTSP
         method to use for a request intended only to perform keep-
         alives.  RTSP servers MUST support the SET_PARAMETER method, so
         that clients can always use this mechanism.

   GET_PARAMETER:  When using GET_PARAMETER for keep-alives, a body
         SHOULD NOT be included, dependent on implementation support in
         the server.  Use the OPTIONS method to determine if there is
         method support or simply try.

   OPTIONS:  This method is also usable, but it causes the server to
         perform more unnecessary processing and results in bigger
         responses than necessary for the task.  The reason is that the
         server needs to determine the capabilities associated with the
         media resource to correctly populate the Public and Allow
         headers.

   The timeout parameter of the Session header (Section 18.49) MAY be
   included in a SETUP response and MUST NOT be included in requests.
   The server uses it to indicate to the client how long the server is
   prepared to wait between RTSP commands or other signs of life before
   closing the session due to lack of activity (see Appendix B).  The
   timeout is measured in seconds, with a default of 60 seconds.  The
   length of the session timeout MUST NOT be changed in an established
   session.

10.6.  Use of IPv6

   Explicit IPv6 [RFC2460] support was not present in RTSP 1.0.  RTSP
   2.0 has been updated for explicit IPv6 support.  Implementations of
   RTSP 2.0 MUST understand literal IPv6 addresses in URIs and RTSP
   headers.  Although the general URI format envisages potential future
   new versions of the literal IP address, usage of any such new version
   would require other modifications to the RTSP specification (e.g.,
   address fields in the Transport header (Section 18.54)).

10.7.  Overload Control

   Overload in RTSP can occur when servers and proxies have insufficient
   resources to complete the processing of a request.  An improper
   handling of such an overload situation at proxies and servers can
   impact the operation of the RTSP deployment, and probably worsen the
   situation.  RTSP defines the 503 (Service Unavailable) response
   (Section 17.5.4) to let servers and proxies notify requesting proxies
   and RTSP clients about an overload situation.  In conjunction with





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 58]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   the Retry-After header (Section 18.44), the server or proxy can
   indicate the time after which the requesting entity can send another
   request to the proxy or server.

   There are two scopes of such 503 answers.  The first scope is for an
   established RTSP session, where the request resulting in the 503
   response as well as the response itself carries a Session header
   identifying the session that is suffering overload.  This response
   only applies to this particular session.  The other scope is the
   general RTSP server as identified by the host in the Request-URI.
   Such a 503 answer with any Retry-After header applies to all requests
   that are not session specific to that server, including a SETUP
   request intended to create a new RTSP session.

   Another scope for overload situations exists: the RTSP proxy.  To
   enable an RTSP proxy to signal that it is overloaded, or otherwise
   unavailable and unable to handle the request, a 553 response code has
   been defined with the meaning "Proxy Unavailable".  As with servers,
   there is a separation in response scopes between requests associated
   with existing RTSP sessions and requests to create new sessions or
   general proxy requests.

   Simply implementing and using the 503 (Service Unavailable) and 553
   (Proxy Unavailable) response codes is not sufficient for properly
   handling overload situations.  For instance, a simplistic approach
   would be to send the 503 response with a Retry-After header set to a
   fixed value.  However, this can cause a situation in which multiple
   RTSP clients again send requests to a proxy or server at roughly the
   same time, which may again cause an overload situation.  Another
   situation would be if the "old" overload situation is not yet
   resolved, i.e., the length indicated in the Retry-After header was
   too short for the overload situation to subside.

   An RTSP server or proxy in an overload situation must select the
   value of the Retry-After header carefully, bearing in mind its
   current load situation.  It is REQUIRED to increase the timeout
   period in proportion to the current load on the server, i.e., an
   increasing workload should result in an increased length of the
   indicated unavailability.  It is REQUIRED not to send the same value
   in the Retry-After header to all requesting proxies and clients, but
   to add a variation to the mean value of the Retry-After header.

   A more complex case may arise when a load-balancing RTSP proxy is in
   use.  This is the case when an RTSP proxy is used to select amongst a
   set of RTSP servers to handle the requests or when multiple server
   addresses are available for a given server name.  The proxy or client
   may receive a 503 (Service Unavailable) or 553 (Proxy Unavailable)
   response code from one of its RTSP servers or proxies, or a TCP



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 59]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   timeout (if the server is even unable to handle the request message).
   The proxy or client simply retries the other addresses or configured
   proxies, but it may also receive a 503 (Service Unavailable) or 553
   (Proxy Unavailable) response or TCP timeouts from those addresses.
   In such a situation, where none of the RTSP servers/proxies/addresses
   can handle the request, the RTSP agent has to wait before it can send
   any new requests to the RTSP server.  Any additional request to a
   specific address MUST be delayed according to the Retry-After headers
   received.  For addresses where no response was received or TCP
   timeout occurred, an initial wait timer SHOULD be set to 5 seconds.
   That timer MUST be doubled for each additional failure to connect or
   receive response until the value exceeds 30 minutes when the timer's
   mean value may be set to 30 minutes.  It is REQUIRED not to set the
   same value in the timer for each scheduling, but instead to add a
   variation to the mean value, resulting in picking a random value
   within the range of 0.5 to 1.5 times the mean value.

11.  Capability Handling

   This section describes the available capability-handling mechanism
   that allows RTSP to be extended.  Extensions to this version of the
   protocol are basically done in two ways.  Firstly, new headers can be
   added.  Secondly, new methods can be added.  The capability-handling
   mechanism is designed to handle both cases.

   When a method is added, the involved parties can use the OPTIONS
   method to discover whether it is supported.  This is done by issuing
   an OPTIONS request to the other party.  Depending on the URI, it will
   either apply in regard to a certain media resource, the whole server
   in general, or simply the next hop.  The OPTIONS response MUST
   contain a Public header that declares all methods supported for the
   indicated resource.

   It is not necessary to use OPTIONS to discover support of a method,
   as the client could simply try the method.  If the receiver of the
   request does not support the method, it will respond with an error
   code indicating the method is either not implemented (501) or does
   not apply for the resource (405).  The choice between the two
   discovery methods depends on the requirements of the service.

   Feature tags are defined to handle functionality additions that are
   not new methods.  Each feature tag represents a certain block of
   functionality.  The amount of functionality that a feature tag
   represents can vary significantly.  For example, a feature tag can
   represent the functionality a single RTSP header provides.  Another
   feature tag can represent much more functionality, such as the
   "play.basic" feature tag (Section 11.1), which represents the minimal
   media delivery for playback implementation.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 60]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Feature tags are used to determine whether the client, server, or
   proxy supports the functionality that is necessary to achieve the
   desired service.  To determine support of a feature tag, several
   different headers can be used, each explained below:

   Supported:  This header is used to determine the complete set of
         functionality that both client and server have, in general, and
         is not dependent on a specific resource.  The intended usage is
         to determine before one needs to use a functionality that it is
         supported.  It can be used in any method, but OPTIONS is the
         most suitable as it simultaneously determines all methods that
         are implemented.  When sending a request, the requester
         declares all its capabilities by including all supported
         feature tags.  This results in the receiver learning the
         requester's feature support.  The receiver then includes its
         set of features in the response.

   Proxy-Supported:  This header is used in a similar fashion as the
         Supported header, but instead of giving the supported
         functionality of the client or server, it provides both the
         requester and the responder a view of the common functionality
         supported in general by all members of the proxy chain between
         the client and server; it does not depend on the resource.
         Proxies are required to add this header whenever the Supported
         header is present, but proxies may also add it independently of
         the requester.

   Require:  This header can be included in any request where the
         endpoint, i.e., the client or server, is required to understand
         the feature to correctly perform the request.  This can, for
         example, be a SETUP request, where the server is required to
         understand a certain parameter to be able to set up the media
         delivery correctly.  Ignoring this parameter would not have the
         desired effect and is not acceptable.  Therefore, the endpoint
         receiving a request containing a Require MUST negatively
         acknowledge any feature that it does not understand and not
         perform the request.  The response in cases where features are
         not supported is 551 (Option Not Supported).  Also, the
         features that are not supported are given in the Unsupported
         header in the response.

   Proxy-Require:  This header has the same purpose and behavior as
         Require except that it only applies to proxies and not the
         endpoint.  Features that need to be supported by both proxies
         and endpoints need to be included in both the Require and
         Proxy-Require header.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 61]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Unsupported:  This header is used in a 551 (Option Not Supported)
         error response, to indicate which features were not supported.
         Such a response is only the result of the usage of the Require
         or Proxy-Require headers where one or more features were not
         supported.  This information allows the requester to make the
         best of situations as it knows which features are not
         supported.

11.1.  Feature Tag: play.basic

   An implementation supporting all normative parts of this
   specification for the setup and control of playback of media uses the
   feature tag "play.basic" to indicate this support.  The appendices
   (starting with letters) are not part of the functionality included in
   the feature tag unless the appendix is explicitly specified in a main
   section as being a required appendix.

      Note: This feature tag does not mandate any media delivery
      protocol, such as RTP.

      In RTSP 1.0, there was a minimal implementation section.  However,
      that was not consistent with the rest of the specification.  So,
      rather than making an attempt to explicitly enumerate the features
      for play.basic, this specification has to be taken as a whole and
      the necessary features normatively defined as being required are
      included.

12.  Pipelining Support

   Pipelining is a general method to improve performance of request/
   response protocols by allowing the requesting agent to have more than
   one request outstanding and to send them over the same persistent
   connection.  For RTSP, where the relative order of requests will
   matter, it is important to maintain the order of the requests.
   Because of this, the responding agent MUST process the incoming
   requests in their sending order.  The sending order can be determined
   by the CSeq header and its sequence number.  For TCP, the delivery
   order will be the same, between two agents, as the sending order.
   The processing of the request MUST also have been finished before
   processing the next request from the same agent.  The responses MUST
   be sent in the order the requests were processed.

   RTSP 2.0 has extended support for pipelining beyond the capabilities
   in RTSP 1.0.  As a major improvement, all requests involved in
   setting up and initiating media delivery can now be pipelined,
   indicated by the Pipelined-Request header (see Section 18.33).  This
   header allows a client to request that two or more requests be
   processed in the same RTSP session context that the first request



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 62]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   creates.  In other words, a client can request that two or more media
   streams be set up and then played without needing to wait for a
   single response.  This speeds up the initial start-up time for an
   RTSP session by at least one RTT.

   If a pipelined request builds on the successful completion of one or
   more prior requests, the requester must verify that all requests were
   executed as expected.  A common example will be two SETUP requests
   and a PLAY request.  In case one of the SETUP requests fails
   unexpectedly, the PLAY request can still be successfully executed.
   However, the resulting presentation will not be as expected by the
   requesting client, as only a single media instead of two will be
   played.  In this case, the client can send a PAUSE request, correct
   the failing SETUP request, and then request it be played.

13.  Method Definitions

   The method indicates what is to be performed on the resource
   identified by the Request-URI.  The method name is case sensitive.
   New methods may be defined in the future.  Method names MUST NOT
   start with a $ character (decimal 36) and MUST be a token as defined
   by the ABNF [RFC5234] in Section 20.  The methods are summarized in
   Table 7.




























Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 63]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


    +---------------+-----------+--------+-------------+-------------+
    | method        | direction | object | Server req. | Client req. |
    +---------------+-----------+--------+-------------+-------------+
    | DESCRIBE      | C -> S    | P,S    | recommended | recommended |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | GET_PARAMETER | C -> S    | P,S    | optional    | optional    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    |               | S -> C    | P,S    | optional    | optional    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | OPTIONS       | C -> S    | P,S    | required    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    |               | S -> C    | P,S    | optional    | optional    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | PAUSE         | C -> S    | P,S    | required    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | PLAY          | C -> S    | P,S    | required    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | PLAY_NOTIFY   | S -> C    | P,S    | required    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | REDIRECT      | S -> C    | P,S    | optional    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | SETUP         | C -> S    | S      | required    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | SET_PARAMETER | C -> S    | P,S    | required    | optional    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    |               | S -> C    | P,S    | optional    | optional    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    | TEARDOWN      | C -> S    | P,S    | required    | required    |
    |               |           |        |             |             |
    |               | S -> C    | P      | required    | required    |
    +---------------+-----------+--------+-------------+-------------+

                     Table 7: Overview of RTSP Methods

      Note on Table 7: This table covers RTSP methods, their direction,
      and on what objects (P: presentation, S: stream) they operate.
      Further, it indicates whether a server or a client implementation
      is required (mandatory), recommended, or optional.

      Further note on Table 7: the GET_PARAMETER is optional.  For
      example, a fully functional server can be built to deliver media
      without any parameters.  However, SET_PARAMETER is required, i.e.,
      mandatory to implement for the server; this is due to its usage
      for keep-alive.  PAUSE is required because it is the only way of
      leaving the Play state without terminating the whole session.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 64]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   If an RTSP agent does not support a particular method, it MUST return
   a 501 (Not Implemented) response code and the requesting RTSP agent,
   in turn, SHOULD NOT try this method again for the given agent/
   resource combination.  An RTSP proxy whose main function is to log or
   audit and not modify transport or media handling in any way MAY
   forward RTSP messages with unknown methods.  Note that the proxy
   still needs to perform the minimal required processing, like adding
   the Via header.

13.1.  OPTIONS

   The semantics of the RTSP OPTIONS method is similar to that of the
   HTTP OPTIONS method described in Section 4.3.7 of [RFC7231].
   However, in RTSP, OPTIONS is bidirectional in that a client can send
   the request to a server and vice versa.  A client MUST implement the
   capability to send an OPTIONS request and a server or a proxy MUST
   implement the capability to respond to an OPTIONS request.  In
   addition to this "MUST-implement" functionality, clients, servers and
   proxies MAY provide support both for sending OPTIONS requests and for
   generating responses to the requests.

   An OPTIONS request may be issued at any time.  Such a request does
   not modify the session state.  However, it may prolong the session
   lifespan (see below).  The URI in an OPTIONS request determines the
   scope of the request and the corresponding response.  If the Request-
   URI refers to a specific media resource on a given host, the scope is
   limited to the set of methods supported for that media resource by
   the indicated RTSP agent.  A Request-URI with only the host address
   limits the scope to the specified RTSP agent's general capabilities
   without regard to any specific media.  If the Request-URI is an
   asterisk ("*"), the scope is limited to the general capabilities of
   the next hop (i.e., the RTSP agent in direct communication with the
   request sender).

   Regardless of the scope of the request, the Public header MUST always
   be included in the OPTIONS response, listing the methods that are
   supported by the responding RTSP agent.  In addition, if the scope of
   the request is limited to a media resource, the Allow header MUST be
   included in the response to enumerate the set of methods that are
   allowed for that resource unless the set of methods completely
   matches the set in the Public header.  If the given resource is not
   available, the RTSP agent SHOULD return an appropriate response code,
   such as 3rr or 4xx.  The Supported header MAY be included in the
   request to query the set of features that are supported by the
   responding RTSP agent.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 65]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The OPTIONS method can be used to keep an RTSP session alive.
   However, this is not the preferred way of session keep-alive
   signaling; see Section 18.49.  An OPTIONS request intended for
   keeping alive an RTSP session MUST include the Session header with
   the associated session identifier.  Such a request SHOULD also use
   the media or the aggregated control URI as the Request-URI.

   Example:

     C->S:  OPTIONS rtsp://server.example.com RTSP/2.0
            CSeq: 1
            User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
            Proxy-Require: gzipped-messages
            Supported: play.basic

     S->C:  RTSP/2.0 200 OK
            CSeq: 1
            Public: DESCRIBE, SETUP, TEARDOWN, PLAY, PAUSE, OPTIONS
            Supported: play.basic, setup.rtp.rtcp.mux, play.scale
            Server: PhonyServer/1.1


   Note that the "gzipped-messages" feature tag in the Proxy-Require is
   a fictitious feature.

13.2.  DESCRIBE

   The DESCRIBE method is used to retrieve the description of a
   presentation or media object from a server.  The Request-URI of the
   DESCRIBE request identifies the media resource of interest.  The
   client MAY include the Accept header in the request to list the
   description formats that it understands.  The server MUST respond
   with a description of the requested resource and return the
   description in the message body of the response, if the DESCRIBE
   method request can be successfully fulfilled.  The DESCRIBE reply-
   response pair constitutes the media initialization phase of RTSP.

   The DESCRIBE response SHOULD contain all media initialization
   information for the resource(s) that it describes.  Servers SHOULD
   NOT use the DESCRIBE response as a means of media indirection by
   having the description point at another server; instead, using the
   3rr responses is RECOMMENDED.

      By forcing a DESCRIBE response to contain all media initialization
      information for the set of streams that it describes, and
      discouraging the use of DESCRIBE for media indirection, any
      looping problems can be avoided that might have resulted from
      other approaches.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 66]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     C->S: DESCRIBE rtsp://server.example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 312
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Accept: application/sdp, application/example

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 312
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Server: PhonyServer/1.1
           Content-Base: rtsp://server.example.com/fizzle/foo/
           Content-Type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 358

           v=0
           o=MNobody 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4 192.0.2.46
           s=SDP Seminar
           i=A Seminar on the session description protocol
           u=http://www.example.com/lectures/sdp.ps
           e=seminar@example.com (Seminar Management)
           c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
           a=control:*
           t=2873397496 2873404696
           m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0
           a=control:audio
           m=video 2232 RTP/AVP 31
           a=control:video

   Media initialization is a requirement for any RTSP-based system, but
   the RTSP specification does not dictate that this is required to be
   done via the DESCRIBE method.  There are three ways that an RTSP
   client may receive initialization information:

   o  via an RTSP DESCRIBE request

   o  via some other protocol (HTTP, email attachment, etc.)

   o  via some form of user interface

   If a client obtains a valid description from an alternate source, the
   client MAY use this description for initialization purposes without
   issuing a DESCRIBE request for the same media.  The client should use
   any MTag to either validate the presentation description or make the
   session establishment conditional on being valid.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 67]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   It is RECOMMENDED that minimal servers support the DESCRIBE method,
   and highly recommended that minimal clients support the ability to
   act as "helper applications" that accept a media initialization file
   from a user interface, or other means that are appropriate to the
   operating environment of the clients.

13.3.  SETUP

   The description below uses the following states in a protocol state
   machine that is related to a specific session when that session has
   been created.  The state transitions are driven by protocol
   interactions.  For additional information about the state machine,
   see Appendix B.

   Init: Initial state.  No session exists.

   Ready:  Session is ready to start playing.

   Play: Session is playing, i.e., sending media-stream data in the
         direction S->C.

   The SETUP request for a URI specifies the transport mechanism to be
   used for the streamed media.  The SETUP method may be used in two
   different cases, namely, creating an RTSP session and changing the
   transport parameters of media streams that are already set up.  SETUP
   can be used in all three states, Init, Ready, and Play, to change the
   transport parameters.  Additionally, Init and Ready can also be used
   for the creation of the RTSP session.  The usage of the SETUP method
   in the Play state to add a media resource to the session is
   unspecified.

   The Transport header, see Section 18.54, specifies the media-
   transport parameters acceptable to the client for data transmission;
   the response will contain the transport parameters selected by the
   server.  This allows the client to enumerate, in descending order of
   preference, the transport mechanisms and parameters acceptable to it,
   so the server can select the most appropriate.  It is expected that
   the session description format used will enable the client to select
   a limited number of possible configurations that are offered as
   choices to the server.  All transport-related parameters SHALL be
   included in the Transport header; the use of other headers for this
   purpose is NOT RECOMMENDED due to middleboxes, such as firewalls or
   NATs.

   For the benefit of any intervening firewalls, a client MUST indicate
   the known transport parameters, even if it has no influence over
   these parameters, for example, where the server advertises a fixed-
   multicast address as destination.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 68]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      Since SETUP includes all transport initialization information,
      firewalls and other intermediate network devices (which need this
      information) are spared the more arduous task of parsing the
      DESCRIBE response, which has been reserved for media
      initialization.

   The client MUST include the Accept-Ranges header in the request,
   indicating all supported unit formats in the Range header.  This
   allows the server to know which formats it may use in future session-
   related responses, such as a PLAY response without any range in the
   request.  If the client does not support a time format necessary for
   the presentation, the server MUST respond using 456 (Header Field Not
   Valid for Resource) and include the Accept-Ranges header with the
   range unit formats supported for the resource.

   In a SETUP response, the server MUST include the Accept-Ranges header
   (see Section 18.5) to indicate which time formats are acceptable to
   use for this media resource.

   The SETUP 200 OK response MUST include the Media-Properties header
   (see Section 18.29).  The combination of the parameters of the Media-
   Properties header indicates the nature of the content present in the
   session (see also Section 4.7).  For example, a live stream with time
   shifting is indicated by

   o  Random access set to Random-Access,

   o  Content Modifications set to Time-Progressing, and

   o  Retention set to Time-Duration (with specific recording window
      time value).

   The SETUP 200 OK response MUST include the Media-Range header (see
   Section 18.30) if the media is Time-Progressing.

















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 69]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   A basic example for SETUP:

     C->S: SETUP rtsp://example.com/foo/bar/baz.rm RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 302
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr=":4588"/":4589",
                      RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1
           Accept-Ranges: npt, clock
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 302
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Server: PhonyServer/1.1
           Session: QKyjN8nt2WqbWw4tIYof52;timeout=60
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr="192.0.2.53:4588"/
                      "192.0.2.53:4589"; src_addr="198.51.100.241:6256"/
                      "198.51.100.241:6257"; ssrc=2A3F93ED
           Accept-Ranges: npt
           Media-Properties: Random-Access=3.2, Time-Progressing,
                             Time-Duration=3600.0
           Media-Range: npt=0-2893.23

   In the above example, the client wants to create an RTSP session
   containing the media resource "rtsp://example.com/foo/bar/baz.rm".
   The transport parameters acceptable to the client are either RTP/AVP/
   UDP (UDP per default) to be received on client port 4588 and 4589 at
   the address the RTSP setup connection comes from or RTP/AVP
   interleaved on the RTSP control channel.  The server selects the
   RTP/AVP/UDP transport and adds the address and ports it will send and
   receive RTP and RTCP from, and the RTP SSRC that will be used by the
   server.

   The server MUST generate a session identifier in response to a
   successful SETUP request unless a SETUP request to a server includes
   a session identifier or a Pipelined-Requests header referencing an
   existing session context.  In that latter case, the server MUST
   bundle this SETUP request into the existing session (aggregated
   session) or return a 459 (Aggregate Operation Not Allowed) error code
   (see Section 17.4.23).  An aggregate control URI MUST be used to
   control an aggregated session.  This URI MUST be different from the
   stream control URIs of the individual media streams included in the
   aggregate (see Section 13.4.2 for aggregated sessions and for the
   particular URIs see Appendix D.1.1).  The aggregate control URI is to
   be specified by the session description if the server supports
   aggregated control and aggregated control is desired for the session.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 70]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   However, even if aggregated control is offered, the client MAY choose
   not to set up the session in aggregated control.  If an aggregate
   control URI is not specified in the session description, it is
   normally an indication that non-aggregated control should be used.

   The SETUP of media streams in an aggregate that has not been given an
   aggregated control URI is unspecified.

      While the session ID sometimes carries enough information for
      aggregate control of a session, the aggregate control URI is still
      important for some methods such as SET_PARAMETER where the control
      URI enables the resource in question to be easily identified.  The
      aggregate control URI is also useful for proxies, enabling them to
      route the request to the appropriate server, and for logging,
      where it is useful to note the actual resource on which a request
      was operating.

   A session will exist until it is either removed by a TEARDOWN request
   or is timed out by the server.  The server MAY remove a session that
   has not demonstrated liveness signs from the client(s) within a
   certain timeout period.  The default timeout value is 60 seconds; the
   server MAY set this to a different value and indicate so in the
   timeout field of the Session header in the SETUP response.  For
   further discussion, see Section 18.49.  Signs of liveness for an RTSP
   session include any RTSP requests from a client that contain a
   Session header with the ID for that session, as well as RTCP sender
   or receiver reports if RTP is used to transport the underlying media
   stream.  RTCP sender reports may, for example, be received in session
   where the server is invited into a conference session and are thus
   valid as a liveness indicator.

   If a SETUP request on a session fails for any reason, the session
   state, as well as transport and other parameters for associated
   streams, MUST remain unchanged from their values as if the SETUP
   request had never been received by the server.

13.3.1.  Changing Transport Parameters

   A client MAY issue a SETUP request for a stream that is already set
   up or playing in the session to change transport parameters, which a
   server MAY allow.  If it does not allow the changing of parameters,
   it MUST respond with error 455 (Method Not Valid in This State).  The
   reasons to support changing transport parameters include allowing
   application-layer mobility and flexibility to utilize the best
   available transport as it becomes available.  If a client receives a
   455 error when trying to change transport parameters while the server
   is in Play state, it MAY try to put the server in Ready state using
   PAUSE before issuing the SETUP request again.  If that also fails,



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 71]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   the changing of transport parameters will require that the client
   perform a TEARDOWN of the affected media and then set it up again.
   For an aggregated session, not tearing down all the media at the same
   time will avoid the creation of a new session.

   All transport parameters MAY be changed.  However, the primary usage
   expected is to either change the transport protocol completely, like
   switching from Interleaved TCP mode to UDP or vice versa, or to
   change the delivery address.

   In a SETUP response for a request to change the transport parameters
   while in Play state, the server MUST include the Range header to
   indicate at what point the new transport parameters will be used.
   Further, if RTP is used for delivery, the server MUST also include
   the RTP-Info header to indicate at what timestamp and RTP sequence
   number the change will take place.  If both RTP-Info and Range are
   included in the response, the "rtp_time" parameter and start point in
   the Range header MUST be for the corresponding time, i.e., be used in
   the same way as for PLAY to ensure the correct synchronization
   information is available.

   If the transport-parameters change that happened while in Play state
   results in a change of synchronization-related information, for
   example, changing RTP SSRC, the server MUST include the necessary
   synchronization information in the SETUP response.  However, the
   server SHOULD avoid changing the synchronization information if
   possible.

13.4.  PLAY

   This section describes the usage of the PLAY method in general, for
   aggregated sessions, and in different usage scenarios.

13.4.1.  General Usage

   The PLAY method tells the server to start sending data via the
   mechanism specified in SETUP and which part of the media should be
   played out.  PLAY requests are valid when the session is in Ready or
   Play state.  A PLAY request MUST include a Session header to indicate
   to which session the request applies.

   Upon receipt of the PLAY request, the server MUST position the normal
   play time to the beginning of the range specified in the received
   Range header, within the limits of the media resource and in
   accordance with the Seek-Style header (Section 18.47).  It MUST
   deliver stream data until the end of the range if given, until a new
   PLAY request is received, until a PAUSE request (Section 13.5) is
   received, or until the end of the media is reached.  If no Range



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 72]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   header is present in the PLAY request, the server SHALL play from
   current pause point until the end of media.  The pause point defaults
   at session start to the beginning of the media.  For media that is
   time-progressing and has no retention, the pause point will always be
   set equal to NPT "now", i.e., the current delivery point.  The pause
   point may also be set to a particular point in the media by the PAUSE
   method; see Section 13.6.  The pause point for media that is
   currently playing is equal to the current media position.  For time-
   progressing media with time-limited retention, if the pause point
   represents a position that is older than what is retained by the
   server, the pause point will be moved to the oldest retained
   position.

   What range values are valid depends on the type of content.  For
   content that isn't time-progressing, the range value is valid if the
   given range is part of any media within the aggregate.  In other
   words, the valid media range for the aggregate is the union of all of
   the media components in the aggregate.  If a given range value points
   outside of the media, the response MUST be the 457 (Invalid Range)
   error code and include the Media-Range header (Section 18.30) with
   the valid range for the media.  Except for time-progressing content
   where the client requests a start point prior to what is retained,
   the start point is adjusted to the oldest retained content.  For a
   start point that is beyond the media front edge, i.e., beyond the
   current value for "now", the server SHALL adjust the start value to
   the current front edge.  The Range header's stop point value may
   point beyond the current media edge.  In that case, the server SHALL
   deliver media from the requested (and possibly adjusted) start point
   until the first of either the provided stop point or the end of the
   media.  Please note that if one simply wants to play from a
   particular start point until the end of media, using a Range header
   with an implicit stop point is RECOMMENDED.

   If a client requests to start playing at the end of media, either
   explicitly with a Range header or implicitly with a pause point that
   is at the end of media, a 457 (Invalid Range) error MUST be sent and
   include the Media-Range header (Section 18.30).  It is specified
   below that the Range header also must be included in the response and
   that it will carry the pause point in the media, in the case of the
   session being in Ready State.  Note that this also applies if the
   pause point or requested start point is at the beginning of the media
   and a Scale header (Section 18.46) is included with a negative value
   (playing backwards).

   For media with random access properties, a client may indicate which
   policy for start point selection the server should use.  This is done
   by including the Seek-Style header (Section 18.47) in the PLAY




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 73]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   request.  The Seek-Style applied will affect the content of the Range
   header as it will be adjusted to indicate from what point the media
   actually is delivered.

   A client desiring to play the media from the beginning MUST send a
   PLAY request with a Range header pointing at the beginning, e.g.,
   "npt=0-".  If a PLAY request is received without a Range header and
   media delivery has stopped at the end, the server SHOULD respond with
   a 457 (Invalid Range) error response.  In that response, the current
   pause point MUST be included in a Range header.

   All range specifiers in this specification allow for ranges with an
   implicit start point (e.g., "npt=-30").  When used in a PLAY request,
   the server treats this as a request to start or resume delivery from
   the current pause point, ending at the end time specified in the
   Range header.  If the pause point is located later than the given end
   value, a 457 (Invalid Range) response MUST be returned.

   The example below will play seconds 10 through 25.  It also requests
   that the server deliver media from the first random access point
   prior to the indicated start point.

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/audio RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 835
           Session: ULExwZCXh2pd0xuFgkgZJW
           Range: npt=10-25
           Seek-Style: RAP
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   Servers MUST include a Range header in any PLAY response, even if no
   Range header was present in the request.  The response MUST use the
   same format as the request's Range header contained.  If no Range
   header was in the request, the format used in any previous PLAY
   request within the session SHOULD be used.  If no format has been
   indicated in a previous request, the server MAY use any time format
   supported by the media and indicated in the Accept-Ranges header in
   the SETUP request.  It is RECOMMENDED that NPT is used if supported
   by the media.

   For any error response to a PLAY request, the server's response
   depends on the current session state.  If the session is in Ready
   state, the current pause point is returned using a Range header with
   the pause point as the explicit start point and an implicit stop
   point.  For time-progressing content, where the pause-point moves
   with real-time due to limited retention, the current pause point is
   returned.  For sessions in Play state, the current playout point and





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 74]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   the remaining parts of the range request are returned.  For any media
   with retention longer than 0 seconds, the currently valid Media-Range
   header SHALL also be included in the response.

   A PLAY response MAY include a header carrying synchronization
   information.  As the information necessary is dependent on the media-
   transport format, further rules specifying the header and its usage
   are needed.  For RTP the RTP-Info header is specified, see
   Section 18.45, and used in the following example.

   Here is a simple example for a single audio stream where the client
   requests the media starting from 3.52 seconds and to the end.  The
   server sends a 200 OK response with the actual play time, which is 10
   ms prior (3.51), and the RTP-Info header that contains the necessary
   parameters for the RTP stack.

   C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 836
         Session: ULExwZCXh2pd0xuFgkgZJW
         Range: npt=3.52-
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 836
         Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Range: npt=3.51-324.39
         Seek-Style: First-Prior
             Session: ULExwZCXh2pd0xuFgkgZJW
         RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/audio"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=14783;rtptime=2345962545

   S->C: RTP Packet TS=2345962545 => NPT=3.51
         Media duration=0.16 seconds

   The server replies with the actual start point that will be
   delivered.  This may differ from the requested range if alignment of
   the requested range to valid frame boundaries is required for the
   media source.  Note that some media streams in an aggregate may need
   to be delivered from even earlier points.  Also, some media formats
   have a very long duration per individual data unit; therefore, it
   might be necessary for the client to parse the data unit, and select
   where to start.  The server SHALL also indicate which policy it uses
   for selecting the actual start point by including a Seek-Style
   header.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 75]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   In the following example, the client receives the first media packet
   that stretches all the way up and past the requested playtime.  Thus,
   it is the client's decision whether to render to the user the time
   between 3.52 and 7.05 or to skip it.  In most cases, it is probably
   most suitable not to render that time period.

   C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 836
         Session: ZGGyCJOs8xaLkdNK2dmxQO
         Range: npt=7.05-
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 836
         Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
             Session: ZGGyCJOs8xaLkdNK2dmxQO
         Range: npt=3.52-
         Seek-Style: First-Prior
         RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/audio"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=14783;rtptime=2345962545

   S->C: RTP Packet TS=2345962545 => NPT=3.52
         Duration=4.15 seconds

   After playing the desired range, the presentation does NOT change to
   the Ready state, media delivery simply stops.  If it is necessary to
   put the stream into the Ready state, a PAUSE request MUST be issued.
   A PLAY request while the stream is still in the Play state is legal
   and can be issued without an intervening PAUSE request.  Such a
   request MUST replace the current PLAY action with the new one
   requested, i.e., being handled in the same way as if as the request
   was received in Ready state.  In the case that the range in the Range
   header has an implicit start time ("-endtime"), the server MUST
   continue to play from where it currently was until the specified
   endpoint.  This is useful to change the end to at another point than
   in the previous request.

   The following example plays the whole presentation starting at SMPTE
   time code 0:10:20 until the end of the clip.  Note: the RTP-Info
   headers have been broken into several lines, where subsequent lines
   start with whitespace as allowed by the syntax.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 76]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/twister.en RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 833
         Session: N465Wvsv0cjUy6tLqINkcf
         Range: smpte=0:10:20-
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 833
         Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
         Session: N465Wvsv0cjUy6tLqINkcf
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Range: smpte=0:10:22-0:15:45
         Seek-Style: Next
         RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/twister.en"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=14783;rtptime=2345962545

   For playing back a recording of a live presentation, it may be
   desirable to use clock units:

   C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/meeting.en RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 835
         Session: N465Wvsv0cjUy6tLqINkcf
         Range: clock=19961108T142300Z-19961108T143520Z
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 835
         Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
         Session: N465Wvsv0cjUy6tLqINkcf
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Range: clock=19961108T142300Z-19961108T143520Z
         Seek-Style: Next
         RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/meeting.en"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=53745;rtptime=484589019

13.4.2.  Aggregated Sessions

   PLAY requests can operate on sessions controlling a single media
   stream and on aggregated sessions controlling multiple media streams.

   In an aggregated session, the PLAY request MUST contain an aggregated
   control URI.  A server MUST respond with a 460 error (Only Aggregate
   Operation Allowed) if the client PLAY Request-URI is for a single
   media.  The media in an aggregate MUST be played in sync.  If a
   client wants individual control of the media, it needs to use
   separate RTSP sessions for each media.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 77]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   For aggregated sessions where the initial SETUP request (creating a
   session) is followed by one or more additional SETUP requests, a PLAY
   request MAY be pipelined (Section 12) after those additional SETUP
   requests without awaiting their responses.  This procedure can reduce
   the delay from the start of session establishment until media playout
   has started with one RTT.  However, a client needs to be aware that
   using this procedure will result in the playout of the server state
   established at the time of processing the PLAY, i.e., after the
   processing of all the requests prior to the PLAY request in the
   pipeline.  This state may not be the intended one due to failure of
   any of the prior requests.  A client can easily determine this based
   on the responses from those requests.  In case of failure, the client
   can halt the media playout using PAUSE and try to establish the
   intended state again before issuing another PLAY request.

13.4.3.  Updating Current PLAY Requests

   Clients can issue PLAY requests while the stream is in Play state and
   thus updating their request.

   The important difference compared to a PLAY request in Ready state is
   the handling of the current play point and how the Range header in
   the request is constructed.  The session is actively playing media
   and the play point will be moving, making the exact time a request
   will take effect hard to predict.  Depending on how the PLAY header
   appears, two different cases exist: total replacement or
   continuation.  A total replacement is signaled by having the first
   range specification have an explicit start value, e.g., "npt=45-" or
   "npt=45-60", in which case the server stops playout at the current
   playout point and then starts delivering media according to the Range
   header.  This is equivalent to having the client first send a PAUSE
   and then a new PLAY request that isn't based on the pause point.  In
   the case of continuation, the first range specifier has an implicit
   start point and an explicit stop value (Z), e.g., "npt=-60", which
   indicate that it MUST convert the range specifier being played prior
   to this PLAY request (X to Y) into (X to Z) and continue as if this
   was the request originally played.  If the current delivery point is
   beyond the stop point, the server SHALL immediately pause delivery.
   As the request has been completed successfully, it shall be responded
   to with a 200 OK response.  A PLAY_NOTIFY with end-of-stream is also
   sent to indicate the actual stop point.  The pause point is set to
   the requested stop point.

   The following is an example of this behavior: The server has received
   requests to play ranges 10 to 15.  If the new PLAY request arrives at
   the server 4 seconds after the previous one, it will take effect





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 78]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   while the server still plays the first range (10-15).  The server
   changes the current play to continue to 25 seconds, i.e., the
   equivalent single request would be PLAY with "range: npt=10-25".

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 834
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Range: npt=10-15
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 834
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Range: npt=10-15
           Seek-Style: Next
           RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=5712;rtptime=934207921,
                   url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/videotrack"
                   ssrc=789DAF12:seq=57654;rtptime=2792482193


     C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 835
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Range: npt=-25
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 835
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:09 GMT
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Range: npt=14-25
           Seek-Style: Next
           RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=5712;rtptime=934239921,
                   url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/videotrack"
                   ssrc=789DAF12:seq=57654;rtptime=2792842193

   A common use of a PLAY request while in Play state is changing the
   scale of the media, i.e., entering or leaving fast forward or fast
   rewind.  The client can issue an updating PLAY request that is either
   a continuation or a complete replacement, as discussed above this
   section.  Below is an example of a client that is requesting a fast
   forward (scale = 2) without giving a stop point and then a change
   from fast forward to regular playout (scale = 1).  In the second PLAY



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 79]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   request, the time is set explicitly to be wherever the server
   currently plays out (npt=now-) and the server responds with the
   actual playback point where the new scale actually takes effect
   (npt=02:17:27.144-).

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 2034
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Range: npt=now-
           Scale: 2.0
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2034
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Range: npt=02:17:21.394-
           Seek-Style: Next
           Scale: 2.0
           RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=5712;rtptime=934207921,
                   url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/videotrack"
                   ssrc=789DAF12:seq=57654;rtptime=2792482193


   [playing in fast forward and now returning to scale = 1]

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 2035
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Range: npt=now-
           Scale: 1.0
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2035
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:09 GMT
           Session: apzA8LnjQ5KWTdw0kUkiRh
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Range: npt=02:17:27.144-
           Seek-Style: Next
           Scale: 1.0
           RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=5712;rtptime=934239921,
                   url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/videotrack"
                   ssrc=789DAF12:seq=57654;rtptime=2792842193




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 80]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


13.4.4.  Playing On-Demand Media

   On-demand media is indicated by the content of the Media-Properties
   header in the SETUP response when (see also Section 18.29):

   o  the Random Access property is set to Random-Access;

   o  the Content Modifications property is set to Immutable;

   o  the Retention property is set to Unlimited or Time-Limited.

   Playing on-demand media follows the general usage as described in
   Section 13.4.1.

13.4.5.  Playing Dynamic On-Demand Media

   Dynamic on-demand media is indicated by the content of the Media-
   Properties header in the SETUP response when (see also
   Section 18.29):

   o  the Random Access property is set to Random-Access;

   o  the Content Modifications property is set to Dynamic;

   o  the Retention property is set to Unlimited or Time-Limited.

   Playing on-demand media follows the general usage as described in
   Section 13.4.1 as long as the media has not been changed.

   There are two ways for the client to be informed about changes of
   media resources in Play state.  The first being that the client will
   receive a PLAY_NOTIFY request with the Notify-Reason header set to
   media-properties-update (see Section 13.5.2).  The client can use the
   value of the Media-Range header to decide further actions, if the
   Media-Range header is present in the PLAY_NOTIFY request.  The second
   way is that the client issues a GET_PARAMETER request without a body
   but including a Media-Range header.  The 200 OK response MUST include
   the current Media-Range header (see Section 18.30).

13.4.6.  Playing Live Media

   Live media is indicated by the content of the Media-Properties header
   in the SETUP response when (see also Section 18.29):

   o  the Random Access property is set to No-Seeking;

   o  the Content Modifications property is set to Time-Progressing;




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 81]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  the Retention property's Time-Duration is set to 0.0.

   For live media, the SETUP 200 OK response MUST include the Media-
   Range header (see Section 18.30).

   A client MAY send PLAY requests without the Range header.  If the
   request includes the Range header, it MUST use a symbolic value
   representing "now".  For NPT, that range specification is "npt=now-".
   The server MUST include the Range header in the response, and it MUST
   indicate an explicit time value and not a symbolic value.  In other
   words, "npt=now-" cannot be used in the response.  Instead, the time
   since session start is recommended, expressed as an open interval,
   e.g., "npt=96.23-".  An absolute time value (clock) for the
   corresponding time MAY be given, i.e., "clock=20030213T143205Z-".
   The Absolute Time format can only be used if the client has shown
   support for it using the Accept-Ranges header.

13.4.7.  Playing Live with Recording

   Certain media servers may offer recording services of live sessions
   to their clients.  This recording would normally be from the
   beginning of the media session.  Clients can randomly access the
   media between now and the beginning of the media session.  This live
   media with recording is indicated by the content of the Media-
   Properties header in the SETUP response when (see also
   Section 18.29):

   o  the Random Access property is set to Random-Access;

   o  the Content Modifications property is set to Time-Progressing;

   o  the Retention property is set to Time-Limited or Unlimited

   The SETUP 200 OK response MUST include the Media-Range header (see
   Section 18.30) for this type of media.  For live media with
   recording, the Range header indicates the current delivery point in
   the media and the Media-Range header indicates the currently
   available media window around the current time.  This window can
   cover recorded content in the past (seen from current time in the
   media) or recorded content in the future (seen from current time in
   the media).  The server adjusts the delivery point to the requested
   border of the window.  If the client requests a delivery point that
   is located outside the recording window, e.g., if the requested point
   is too far in the past, the server selects the oldest point in the
   recording.  The considerations in Section 13.5.3 apply if a client
   requests delivery with scale (Section 18.46) values other than 1.0
   (normal playback rate) while delivering live media with recording.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 82]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


13.4.8.  Playing Live with Time-Shift

   Certain media servers may offer time-shift services to their clients.
   This time shift records a fixed interval in the past, i.e., a sliding
   window recording mechanism, but not past this interval.  Clients can
   randomly access the media between now and the interval.  This live
   media with recording is indicated by the content of the Media-
   Properties header in the SETUP response when (see also
   Section 18.29):

   o  the Random Access property is set to Random-Access;

   o  the Content Modifications property is set to Time-Progressing;

   o  the Retention property is set to Time-Duration and a value
      indicating the recording interval (>0).

   The SETUP 200 OK response MUST include the Media-Range header (see
   Section 18.30) for this type of media.  For live media with
   recording, the Range header indicates the current time in the media
   and the Media-Range header indicates a window around the current
   time.  This window can cover recorded content in the past (seen from
   current time in the media) or recorded content in the future (seen
   from current time in the media).  The server adjusts the play point
   to the requested border of the window, if the client requests a play
   point that is located outside the recording windows, e.g., if
   requested too far in the past, the server selects the oldest range in
   the recording.  The considerations in Section 13.5.3 apply if a
   client requests delivery using a scale (Section 18.46) value other
   than 1.0 (normal playback rate) while delivering live media with
   time-shift.

13.5.  PLAY_NOTIFY

   The PLAY_NOTIFY method is issued by a server to inform a client about
   an asynchronous event for a session in Play state.  The Session
   header MUST be presented in a PLAY_NOTIFY request and indicates the
   scope of the request.  Sending of PLAY_NOTIFY requests requires a
   persistent connection between server and client; otherwise, there is
   no way for the server to send this request method to the client.

   PLAY_NOTIFY requests have an end-to-end (i.e., server-to-client)
   scope, as they carry the Session header, and apply only to the given
   session.  The client SHOULD immediately return a response to the
   server.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 83]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   PLAY_NOTIFY requests MAY use both an aggregate control URI and
   individual media resource URIs, depending on the scope of the
   notification.  This scope may have important distinctions for
   aggregated sessions, and each reason for a PLAY_NOTIFY request needs
   to specify the interpretation as well as if aggregated control URIs
   or individual URIs may be used in requests.

   PLAY_NOTIFY requests can be used with a message body, depending on
   the value of the Notify-Reason header.  It is described in the
   particular section for each Notify-Reason if a message body is used.
   However, currently there is no Notify-Reason that allows the use of a
   message body.  In this case, there is a need to obey some limitations
   when adding new Notify-Reasons that intend to use a message body: the
   server can send any type of message body, but it is not ensured that
   the client can understand the received message body.  This is related
   to DESCRIBE (see Section 13.2 ); but, in this particular case, the
   client can state its acceptable message bodies by using the Accept
   header.  In the case of PLAY_NOTIFY, the server does not know which
   message bodies are understood by the client.

   The Notify-Reason header (see Section 18.32) specifies the reason why
   the server sends the PLAY_NOTIFY request.  This is extensible and new
   reasons can be added in the future (see Section 22.8).  In case the
   client does not understand the reason for the notification, it MUST
   respond with a 465 (Notification Reason Unknown) (Section 17.4.29)
   error code.  This document defines how servers can send PLAY_NOTIFY
   with Notify-Reason values of these types:

   o  end-of-stream (see Section 13.5.1);

   o  media-properties-update (see Section 13.5.2);

   o  scale-change (see Section 13.5.3).

13.5.1.  End-of-Stream

   A PLAY_NOTIFY request with the Notify-Reason header set to end-of-
   stream indicates the completion or near completion of the PLAY
   request and the ending delivery of the media stream(s).  The request
   MUST NOT be issued unless the server is in the Play state.  The end
   of the media stream delivery notification may be used either to
   indicate a successful completion of the PLAY request currently being
   served or to indicate some error resulting in failure to complete the
   request.  The Request-Status header (Section 18.42) MUST be included
   to indicate which request the notification is for and its completion
   status.  The message response status codes (Section 8.1.1) are used
   to indicate how the PLAY request concluded.  The sender of a
   PLAY_NOTIFY MAY issue an updated PLAY_NOTIFY, in the case of a



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 84]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   PLAY_NOTIFY sent with wrong information.  For instance, a PLAY_NOTIFY
   was issued before reaching the end-of-stream, but some error occurred
   resulting in that the previously sent PLAY_NOTIFY contained a wrong
   time when the stream will end.  In this case, a new PLAY_NOTIFY MUST
   be sent including the correct status for the completion and all
   additional information.

   PLAY_NOTIFY requests with the Notify-Reason header set to end-of-
   stream MUST include a Range header and the Scale header if the scale
   value is not 1.  The Range header indicates the point in the stream
   or streams where delivery is ending with the timescale that was used
   by the server in the PLAY response for the request being fulfilled.
   The server MUST NOT use the "now" constant in the Range header; it
   MUST use the actual numeric end position in the proper timescale.
   When end-of-stream notifications are issued prior to having sent the
   last media packets, this is made evident because the end time in the
   Range header is beyond the current time in the media being received
   by the client, e.g., "npt=-15", if npt is currently at 14.2 seconds.
   The Scale header is to be included so that it is evident if the media
   timescale is moving backwards or has a non-default pace.  The end-of-
   stream notification does not prevent the client from sending a new
   PLAY request.

   If RTP is used as media transport, an RTP-Info header MUST be
   included, and the RTP-Info header MUST indicate the last sequence
   number in the sequence parameter.

   For an RTSP Session where media resources are under aggregated
   control, the media resources will normally end at approximately the
   same time, although some small differences may exist, on the scale of
   a few hundred milliseconds.  In those cases, an RTSP session under
   aggregated control SHOULD send only a single PLAY_NOTIFY request.  By
   using the aggregate control URI in the PLAY_NOTIFY request, the RTSP
   server indicates that this applies to all media resources within the
   session.  In cases in which RTP is used for media delivery,
   corresponding RTP-Info needs to be included for all media resources.
   In cases where one or more media resources have a significantly
   shorter duration than some other resources in the aggregated session,
   the server MAY send end-of-stream notifications using individual
   media resource URIs to indicate to agents that there will be no more
   media for this particular media resource related to the current
   active PLAY request.  In such cases, when the remaining media
   resources come to the end of the stream, they MUST send a PLAY_NOTIFY
   request using the aggregate control URI to indicate that no more
   resources remain.

   A PLAY_NOTIFY request with Notify-Reason header set to end-of-stream
   MUST NOT carry a message body.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 85]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This example request notifies the client about a future end-of-stream
   event:

     S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 854
           Notify-Reason: end-of-stream
           Request-Status: cseq=853 status=200 reason="OK"
           Range: npt=-145
           RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo/audio"
              ssrc=0D12F123:seq=14783;rtptime=2345962545,
              url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/video"
              ssrc=789DAF12:seq=57654;rtptime=2792482193
           Session: CDtUJfDQXJWtJ7Iqua2xOi
           Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:37:16 GMT

     C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 854
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Session: CDtUJfDQXJWtJ7Iqua2xOi

13.5.2.  Media-Properties-Update

   A PLAY_NOTIFY request with a Notify-Reason header set to media-
   properties-update indicates an update of the media properties for the
   given session (see Section 18.29) or the available media range that
   can be played as indicated by the Media-Range header (Section 18.30).
   PLAY_NOTIFY requests with Notify-Reason header set to media-
   properties-update MUST include a Media-Properties and Date header and
   SHOULD include a Media-Range header.  The Media-Properties header has
   session scope; thus, for aggregated sessions, the PLAY_NOTIFY request
   MUST use the aggregated control URI.

   This notification MUST be sent for media that are time-progressing
   every time an event happens that changes the basis for making
   estimates on how the available for play-back media range will
   progress with wall clock time.  In addition, it is RECOMMENDED that
   the server send these notifications approximately every 5 minutes for
   time-progressing content to ensure the long-term stability of the
   client estimation and allow for clock skew detection by the client.
   The time between notifications should be greater than 1 minute and
   less than 2 hours.  For the reasons just explained, requests MUST
   include a Media-Range header to provide current Media duration and a
   Range header to indicate the current playing point and any remaining
   parts of the requested range.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 86]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      The recommendation for sending updates every 5 minutes is due to
      any clock skew issues.  In 5 minutes, the clock skew should not
      become too significant as this is not used for media playback and
      synchronization, it is only for determining which content is
      available to the user.

   A PLAY_NOTIFY request with Notify-Reason header set to media-
   properties-update MUST NOT carry a message body.

    S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2008 15:48:06 GMT
           CSeq: 854
           Notify-Reason: media-properties-update
           Session: CDtUJfDQXJWtJ7Iqua2xOi
           Media-Properties: Time-Progressing,
                 Time-Limited=20080415T153919.36Z, Random-Access=5.0
           Media-Range: npt=00:00:00-01:37:21.394
           Range: npt=01:15:49.873-

     C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 854
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Session: CDtUJfDQXJWtJ7Iqua2xOi

13.5.3.  Scale-Change

   The server may be forced to change the rate of media time per
   playback time when a client requests delivery using a scale
   (Section 18.46) value other than 1.0 (normal playback rate).  For
   time-progressing media with some retention, i.e., the server stores
   already-sent content, a client requesting to play with scale values
   larger than 1 may catch up with the front end of the media.  The
   server will then be unable to continue to provide content at scale
   larger than 1 as content is only made available by the server at
   scale = 1.  Another case is when scale < 1 and the media retention is
   Time-Duration limited.  In this case, the delivery point can reach
   the oldest media unit available, and further playback at this scale
   becomes impossible as there will be no media available.  To avoid
   having the client lose any media, the scale will need to be adjusted
   to the same rate at which the media is removed from the storage
   buffer, commonly scale = 1.0.

   Another case is when the content itself consists of spliced pieces or
   is dynamically updated.  In these cases, the server may be required
   to change from one supported scale value (different than scale = 1.0)
   to another.  In this case, the server will pick the closest value and





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 87]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   inform the client of what it has picked.  In these cases, the media
   properties will also be sent, updating the supported scale values.
   This enables a client to adjust the scale value used.

   To minimize impact on playback in any of the above cases, the server
   MUST modify the playback properties, set scale to a supportable
   value, and continue delivery of the media.  When doing this
   modification, it MUST send a PLAY_NOTIFY message with the Notify-
   Reason header set to "scale-change".  The request MUST contain a
   Range header with the media time when the change took effect, a Scale
   header with the new value in use, a Session header with the
   identifier for the session to which it applies, and a Date header
   with the server wallclock time of the change.  For time-progressing
   content, the Media-Range and the Media-Properties headers at this
   point in time also MUST be included.  The Media-Properties header
   MUST be included if the scale change was due to the content changing
   what scale values ("Scales") are supported.

   For media streams delivered using RTP, an RTP-Info header MUST also
   be included.  It MUST contain the rtptime parameter with a value
   corresponding to the point of change in that media and optionally the
   sequence number.

   PLAY_NOTIFY requests for aggregated sessions MUST use the aggregated
   control URI in the request.  The scale change for any aggregated
   session applies to all media streams that are part of the aggregate.

   A PLAY_NOTIFY request with Notify-Reason header set to "Scale-Change"
   MUST NOT carry a message body.






















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 88]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


     S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2008 15:48:06 GMT
           CSeq: 854
           Notify-Reason: scale-change
           Session: CDtUJfDQXJWtJ7Iqua2xOi
           Media-Properties: Time-Progressing,
                 Time-Limited=20080415T153919.36Z, Random-Access=5.0
           Media-Range: npt=00:00:00-01:37:21.394
           Range: npt=01:37:21.394-
           Scale: 1
           RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo/audio"
               ssrc=0D12F123:rtptime=2345962545,
               url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo/videotrack"
               ssrc=789DAF12:seq=57654;rtptime=2792482193

     C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 854
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Session: CDtUJfDQXJWtJ7Iqua2xOi

13.6.  PAUSE

   The PAUSE request causes the stream delivery to immediately be
   interrupted (halted).  A PAUSE request MUST be made either with the
   aggregated control URI for aggregated sessions, resulting in all
   media being halted, or with the media URI for non-aggregated
   sessions.  Any attempt to mute a single media with a PAUSE request in
   an aggregated session MUST be responded to with a 460 (Only Aggregate
   Operation Allowed) error.  After resuming playback, synchronization
   of the tracks MUST be maintained.  Any server resources are kept,
   though servers MAY close the session and free resources after being
   paused for the duration specified with the timeout parameter of the
   Session header in the SETUP message.

   Example:

     C->S: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 834
           Session: OoOUPyUwt0VeY9fFRHuZ6L
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 834
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
                   Session: OoOUPyUwt0VeY9fFRHuZ6L
           Range: npt=45.76-75.00





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 89]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The PAUSE request causes stream delivery to be interrupted
   immediately on receipt of the message, and the pause point is set to
   the current point in the presentation.  That pause point in the media
   stream needs to be maintained.  A subsequent PLAY request without a
   Range header resumes from the pause point and plays until media end.

   The pause point after any PAUSE request MUST be returned to the
   client by adding a Range header with what remains unplayed of the
   PLAY request's range.  For media with random access properties, if
   one desires to resume playing a ranged request, one simply includes
   the Range header from the PAUSE response and includes the Seek-Style
   header with the Next policy in the PLAY request.  For media that is
   time-progressing and has retention duration=0, the follow-up PLAY
   request to start media delivery again MUST use "npt=now-" and not the
   answer given in the response to PAUSE.

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 834
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Range: npt=10-30
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 834
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Range: npt=10-30
           Seek-Style: First-Prior
           RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=5712;rtptime=934207921,
                   url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/videotrack"
                   ssrc=4FAD8726:seq=57654;rtptime=2792482193
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr


















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 90]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   After 11 seconds, i.e., at 21 seconds into the presentation:

     C->S: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 835
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 835
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:17 GMT
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Range: npt=21-30
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

   If a client issues a PAUSE request and the server acknowledges and
   enters the Ready state, the proper server response, if the player
   issues another PAUSE, is still 200 OK.  The 200 OK response MUST
   include the Range header with the current pause point.  See examples
   below:

     C->S: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 834
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 834
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Range: npt=45.76-98.36

     C->S: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 835
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 835
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:07 GMT
           Range: npt=45.76-98.36










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 91]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


13.7.  TEARDOWN

13.7.1.  Client to Server

   The TEARDOWN client-to-server request stops the stream delivery for
   the given URI, freeing the resources associated with it.  A TEARDOWN
   request can be performed on either an aggregated or a media control
   URI.  However, some restrictions apply depending on the current
   state.  The TEARDOWN request MUST contain a Session header indicating
   to what session the request applies.  The TEARDOWN request MUST NOT
   include a Terminate-Reason header.

   A TEARDOWN using the aggregated control URI or the media URI in a
   session under non-aggregated control (single media session) MAY be
   done in any state (Ready and Play).  A successful request MUST result
   in that media delivery being immediately halted and the session state
   being destroyed.  This MUST be indicated through the lack of a
   Session header in the response.

   A TEARDOWN using a media URI in an aggregated session can only be
   done in Ready state.  Such a request only removes the indicated media
   stream and associated resources from the session.  This may result in
   a session returning to non-aggregated control, because it only
   contains a single media after the request's completion.  A session
   that will exist after the processing of the TEARDOWN request MUST, in
   the response to that TEARDOWN request, contain a Session header.

   Thus, the presence of the Session header indicates to the receiver of
   the response if the session is still extant or has been removed.






















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 92]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     C->S: TEARDOWN rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 892
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 892
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0

13.7.2.  Server to Client

   The server can send TEARDOWN requests in the server-to-client
   direction to indicate that the server has been forced to terminate
   the ongoing session.  This may happen for several reasons, such as
   server maintenance without available backup, or that the session has
   been inactive for extended periods of time.  The reason is provided
   in the Terminate-Reason header (Section 18.52).

   When an RTSP client has maintained an RTSP session that otherwise is
   inactive for an extended period of time, the server may reclaim the
   resources.  That is done by issuing a TEARDOWN request with the
   Terminate-Reason set to "Session-Timeout".  This MAY be done when the
   client has been inactive in the RTSP session for more than one
   Session Timeout period (Section 18.49).  However, the server is NOT
   RECOMMENDED to perform this operation until an extended period of
   inactivity of 10 times the Session-Timeout period has passed.  It is
   up to the operator of the RTSP server to actually configure how long
   this extended period of inactivity is.  An operator should take into
   account, when doing this configuration, what the served content is
   and what this means for the extended period of inactivity.

   In case the server needs to stop providing service to the established
   sessions and there is no server to point at in a REDIRECT request,
   then TEARDOWN SHALL be used to terminate the session.  This method
   can also be used when non-recoverable internal errors have happened
   and the server has no other option than to terminate the sessions.

   The TEARDOWN request MUST be made only on the session aggregate
   control URI (i.e., it is not allowed to terminate individual media
   streams, if it is a session aggregate), and it MUST include the
   following headers: Session and Terminate-Reason.  The request only
   applies to the session identified in the Session header.  The server
   may include a message to the client's user with the "user-msg"
   parameter.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 93]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The TEARDOWN request may alternatively be done on the wildcard URI
   "*" and without any session header.  The scope of such a request is
   limited to the next-hop (i.e., the RTSP agent in direct communication
   with the server) and applies, as well, to the RTSP connection between
   the next-hop RTSP agent and the server.  This request indicates that
   all sessions and pending requests being managed via the connection
   are terminated.  Any intervening proxies SHOULD do all of the
   following in the order listed:

   1.  respond to the TEARDOWN request

   2.  disconnect the control channel from the requesting server

   3.  pass the TEARDOWN request to each applicable client (typically
       those clients with an active session or an unanswered request)

      Note: The proxy is responsible for accepting TEARDOWN responses
      from its clients; these responses MUST NOT be passed on to either
      the original server or the target server in the redirect.

13.8.  GET_PARAMETER

   The GET_PARAMETER request retrieves the value of any specified
   parameter or parameters for a presentation or stream specified in the
   URI.  If the Session header is present in a request, the value of a
   parameter MUST be retrieved in the specified session context.  There
   are two ways of specifying the parameters to be retrieved.

   The first approach includes headers that have been defined to be
   usable for this purpose.  Headers for this purpose should allow
   empty, or stripped value parts to avoid having to specify bogus data
   when indicating the desire to retrieve a value.  The successful
   completion of the request should also be evident from any filled out
   values in the response.  The headers in this specification that MAY
   be used for retrieving their current value using GET_PARAMETER are
   listed below; additional headers MAY be specified in the future:

   o  Accept-Ranges

   o  Media-Range

   o  Media-Properties

   o  Range

   o  RTP-Info





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 94]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The other way is to specify a message body that lists the
   parameter(s) that are desired to be retrieved.  The Content-Type
   header (Section 18.19) is used to specify which format the message
   body has.  If the receiver of the request does not support the media
   type used for the message body, it SHALL respond using the error code
   415 (Unsupported Media Type).  The responder to a GET_PARAMETER
   request MUST use the media type of the request for the response.  For
   additional considerations regarding message body negotiation, see
   Section 9.3.

   RTSP agents implementing support for responding to GET_PARAMETER
   requests SHALL implement the "text/parameters" format (Appendix F).
   This to ensure that at least one known format for parameters is
   implemented and, thus, prevent parameter format negotiation failure.

   Parameters specified within the body of the message must all be
   understood by the request-receiving agent.  If one or more parameters
   are not understood a 451 (Parameter Not Understood) MUST be sent
   including a body listing the parameters that weren't understood.  If
   all parameters are understood, their values are filled in and
   returned in the response message body.

   The method can also be used without a message body or any header that
   requests parameters for keep-alive purposes.  The keep-alive timer
   has been updated for any request that is successful, i.e., a 200 OK
   response is received.  Any non-required header present in such a
   request may or may not have been processed.  Normally, the presence
   of filled-out values in the header will be indication that the header
   has been processed.  However, for cases when this is difficult to
   determine, it is recommended to use a feature tag and the Require
   header.  For this reason, it is usually easier if any parameters to
   be retrieved are sent in the body, rather than using any header.



















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 95]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     S->C: GET_PARAMETER rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 431
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Content-Length: 26
           Content-Type: text/parameters

           packets_received
           jitter

     C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 431
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Server: PhonyServer/1.1
           Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:43:23 GMT
           Content-Length: 38
           Content-Type: text/parameters

           packets_received: 10
           jitter: 0.3838

13.9.  SET_PARAMETER

   This method requests the setting of the value of a parameter or a set
   of parameters for a presentation or stream specified by the URI.  If
   the Session header is present in a request, the value of a parameter
   MUST be retrieved in the specified session context.  The method MAY
   also be used without a message body.  It is the RECOMMENDED method to
   be used in a request sent for the sole purpose of updating the keep-
   alive timer.  If this request is successful, i.e., a 200 OK response
   is received, then the keep-alive timer has been updated.  Any non-
   required header present in such a request may or may not have been
   processed.  To allow a client to determine if any such header has
   been processed, it is necessary to use a feature tag and the Require
   header.  Due to this reason it is RECOMMENDED that any parameters are
   sent in the body rather than using any header.

   When using a message body to list the parameter(s) desired to be set,
   the Content-Type header (Section 18.19) is used to specify which
   format the message body has.  If the receiver of the request is not
   supporting the media type used for the message body, it SHALL respond
   using the error code 415 (Unsupported Media Type).  For additional
   considerations regarding message body negotiation, see Section 9.3.
   The responder to a SET_PARAMETER request MUST use the media type of
   the request for the response.  For additional considerations
   regarding message body negotiation, see Section 9.3.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 96]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTSP agents implementing support for responding to SET_PARAMETER
   requests SHALL implement the text/parameters format (Appendix F).
   This is to ensure that at least one known format for parameters is
   implemented and, thus, prevent parameter format negotiation failure.

   A request is RECOMMENDED to only contain a single parameter to allow
   the client to determine why a particular request failed.  If the
   request contains several parameters, the server MUST only act on the
   request if all of the parameters can be set successfully.  A server
   MUST allow a parameter to be set repeatedly to the same value, but it
   MAY disallow changing parameter values.  If the receiver of the
   request does not understand or cannot locate a parameter, error 451
   (Parameter Not Understood) MUST be used.  When a parameter is not
   allowed to change, the error code is 458 (Parameter Is Read-Only).
   The response body MUST contain only the parameters that have errors.
   Otherwise, a body MUST NOT be returned.  The response body MUST use
   the media type of the request for the response.

   Note: transport parameters for the media stream MUST only be set with
   the SETUP command.

      Restricting setting transport parameters to SETUP is for the
      benefit of firewalls connected to border RTSP proxies.

      The parameters are split in a fine-grained fashion so that there
      can be more meaningful error indications.  However, it may make
      sense to allow the setting of several parameters if an atomic
      setting is desirable.  Imagine device control where the client
      does not want the camera to pan unless it can also tilt to the
      right angle at the same time.





















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 97]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     C->S: SET_PARAMETER rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 421
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Session: iixT43KLc
           Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:45:04 GMT
           Content-length: 20
           Content-type: text/parameters

           barparam: barstuff

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 451 Parameter Not Understood
           CSeq: 421
           Session: iixT43KLc
           Server: PhonyServer/1.0
           Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:44:56 GMT
           Content-length: 20
           Content-type: text/parameters

           barparam: barstuff

13.10.  REDIRECT

   The REDIRECT method is issued by a server to inform a client that the
   service provided will be terminated and where a corresponding service
   can be provided instead.  This may happen for different reasons.  One
   is that the server is being administered such that it must stop
   providing service.  Thus, the client is required to connect to
   another server location to access the resource indicated by the
   Request-URI.

   The REDIRECT request SHALL contain a Terminate-Reason header
   (Section 18.52) to inform the client of the reason for the request.
   Additional parameters related to the reason may also be included.
   The intention here is to allow a server administrator to do a
   controlled shutdown of the RTSP server.  That requires sufficient
   time to inform all entities having associated state with the server
   and for them to perform a controlled migration from this server to a
   fall-back server.

   A REDIRECT request with a Session header has end-to-end (i.e.,
   server-to-client) scope and applies only to the given session.  Any
   intervening proxies SHOULD NOT disconnect the control channel while
   there are other remaining end-to-end sessions.  The REQUIRED Location
   header MUST contain a complete absolute URI pointing to the resource
   to which the client SHOULD reconnect.  Specifically, the Location




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 98]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   MUST NOT contain just the host and port.  A client may receive a
   REDIRECT request with a Session header, if and only if, an end-to-end
   session has been established.

   A client may receive a REDIRECT request without a Session header at
   any time when it has communication or a connection established with a
   server.  The scope of such a request is limited to the next-hop
   (i.e., the RTSP agent in direct communication with the server) and
   applies to all sessions controlled, as well as the connection between
   the next-hop RTSP agent and the server.  A REDIRECT request without a
   Session header indicates that all sessions and pending requests being
   managed via the connection MUST be redirected.  The Location header,
   if included in such a request, SHOULD contain an absolute URI with
   only the host address and the OPTIONAL port number of the server to
   which the RTSP agent SHOULD reconnect.  Any intervening proxies
   SHOULD do all of the following in the order listed:

   1.  respond to the REDIRECT request

   2.  disconnect the control channel from the requesting server

   3.  connect to the server at the given host address

   4.  pass the REDIRECT request to each applicable client (typically
       those clients with an active session or an unanswered request)

      Note: The proxy is responsible for accepting REDIRECT responses
      from its clients; these responses MUST NOT be passed on to either
      the original server or the redirected server.

   A server that needs to terminate a session or all its sessions and
   lacks an alternative server to redirect to, SHALL instead use
   TEARDOWN requests.

   When no Terminate-Reason "time" parameter is included in a REDIRECT
   request, the client SHALL perform the redirection immediately and
   return a response to the server.  The server shall consider the
   session to be terminated and can free any associated state after it
   receives the successful (2xx) response.  The server MAY close the
   signaling connection upon receiving the response, and the client
   SHOULD close the signaling connection after sending the 2xx response.
   The exception to this is when the client has several sessions on the
   server being managed by the given signaling connection.  In this
   case, the client SHOULD close the connection when it has received and
   responded to REDIRECT requests for all the sessions managed by the
   signaling connection.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                   [Page 99]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The Terminate-Reason header "time" parameter MAY be used to indicate
   the wallclock time by which the redirection MUST have taken place.
   To allow a client to determine that redirect time without being time
   synchronized with the server, the server MUST include a Date header
   in the request.  The client should have terminated the session and
   closed the connection before the redirection time-line terminated.
   The server MAY simply cease to provide service when the deadline time
   has been reached, or it can issue a TEARDOWN requests to the
   remaining sessions.

   If the REDIRECT request times out following the rules in
   Section 10.4, the server MAY terminate the session or transport
   connection that would be redirected by the request.  This is a
   safeguard against misbehaving clients that refuse to respond to a
   REDIRECT request.  This action removes any incentive of not
   acknowledging the reception of a REDIRECT request.

   After a REDIRECT request has been processed, a client that wants to
   continue to receive media for the resource identified by the Request-
   URI will have to establish a new session with the designated host.
   If the URI given in the Location header is a valid resource URI, a
   client SHOULD issue a DESCRIBE request for the URI.

      Note: The media resource indicated by the Location header can be
      identical, slightly different, or totally different.  This is the
      reason why a new DESCRIBE request SHOULD be issued.

   If the Location header contains only a host address, the client may
   assume that the media on the new server is identical to the media on
   the old server, i.e., all media configuration information from the
   old session is still valid except for the host address.  However, the
   usage of conditional SETUP using MTag identifiers is RECOMMENDED as a
   means to verify the assumption.

   This example request redirects traffic for this session to the new
   server at the given absolute time:

     S->C: REDIRECT rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 732
           Location: rtsp://s2.example.com:8001/fizzle/foo
           Terminate-Reason: Server-Admin ;time=19960213T143205Z
           Session: uZ3ci0K+Ld-M
           Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1996 14:30:43 GMT

     C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 732
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
           Session: uZ3ci0K+Ld-M



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 100]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


14.  Embedded (Interleaved) Binary Data

   In order to fulfill certain requirements on the network side, e.g.,
   in conjunction with network address translators that block RTP
   traffic over UDP, it may be necessary to interleave RTSP messages and
   media-stream data.  This interleaving should generally be avoided
   unless necessary since it complicates client and server operation and
   imposes additional overhead.  Also, head-of-line blocking may cause
   problems.  Interleaved binary data SHOULD only be used if RTSP is
   carried over TCP.  Interleaved data is not allowed inside RTSP
   messages.

   Stream data, such as RTP packets, is encapsulated by an ASCII dollar
   sign (36 decimal) followed by a one-octet channel identifier and the
   length of the encapsulated binary data as a binary, two-octet
   unsigned integer in network octet order (Appendix B of [RFC791]).
   The stream data follows immediately afterwards, without a CRLF, but
   including the upper-layer protocol headers.  Each dollar sign block
   MUST contain exactly one upper-layer protocol data unit, e.g., one
   RTP packet.

      Note that this mechanism does not support PDUs larger than 65535
      octets, which matches the maximum payload size of regular, non-
      jumbo IPv4 and IPv6 packets.  If the media delivery protocol
      intended to be used has larger PDUs than that, a definition of a
      PDU fragmentation mechanism will be required to support embedded
      binary data.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | "$" = 36      | Channel ID    | Length in octets              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      : Binary data (Length according to Length field)                :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

             Figure 1: Embedded Interleaved Binary Data Format

   The channel identifier is defined in the Transport header with the
   interleaved parameter (Section 18.54).

   When the transport choice is RTP, RTCP messages are also interleaved
   by the server over the TCP connection.  The usage of RTCP messages is
   indicated by including an interval containing a second channel in the
   interleaved parameter of the Transport header (see Section 18.54).
   If RTCP is used, packets MUST be sent on the first available channel





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 101]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   that is higher than the RTP channel.  The channels are bidirectional,
   using the same Channel ID in both directions; therefore, RTCP traffic
   is sent on the second channel in both directions.

      RTCP is sometimes needed for synchronization when two or more
      streams are interleaved in such a fashion.  Also, this provides a
      convenient way to tunnel RTP/RTCP packets through the RTSP
      connection (TCP or TCP/TLS) when required by the network
      configuration and to transfer them onto UDP when possible.

     C->S: SETUP rtsp://example.com/bar.file RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1
           Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 18:57:18 GMT
           Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=5-6
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Accept-Ranges: npt
           Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.2, Immutable, Unlimited

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/bar.file RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 3
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3
           Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
           Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 18:57:19 GMT
           RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/bar.file"
             ssrc=0D12F123:seq=232433;rtptime=972948234
           Range: npt=0-56.8
           Seek-Style: RAP

     S->C: $005{2 octet length}{"length" octets data, w/RTP header}
     S->C: $005{2 octet length}{"length" octets data, w/RTP header}
     S->C: $006{2 octet length}{"length" octets  RTCP packet}










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 102]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


15.  Proxies

   RTSP Proxies are RTSP agents that are located in between a client and
   a server.  A proxy can take on the roles of both client and server
   depending on what it tries to accomplish.  RTSP proxies use two
   transport-layer connections: one from the RTSP client to the RTSP
   proxy and a second from the RTSP proxy to the RTSP server.  Proxies
   are introduced for several different reasons; those listed below are
   often combined.

   Caching Proxy:  This type of proxy is used to reduce the workload on
         servers and connections.  By caching the description and media
         streams, i.e., the presentation, the proxy can serve a client
         with content, but without requesting it from the server once it
         has been cached and has not become stale.  See Section 16.
         This type of proxy is also expected to understand RTSP endpoint
         functionality, i.e., functionality identified in the Require
         header in addition to what Proxy-Require demands.

   Translator Proxy:  This type of proxy is used to ensure that an RTSP
         client gets access to servers and content on an external
         network or gets access by using content encodings not supported
         by the client.  The proxy performs the necessary translation of
         addresses, protocols, or encodings.  This type of proxy is
         expected also to understand RTSP endpoint functionality, i.e.,
         functionality identified in the Require header in addition to
         what Proxy-Require demands.

   Access Proxy:  This type of proxy is used to ensure that an RTSP
         client gets access to servers on an external network.  Thus,
         this proxy is placed on the border between two domains, e.g., a
         private address space and the public Internet.  The proxy
         performs the necessary translation, usually addresses.  This
         type of proxy is required to redirect the media to itself or a
         controlled gateway that performs the translation before the
         media can reach the client.

   Security Proxy:  This type of proxy is used to help facilitate
         security functions around RTSP.  For example, in the case of a
         firewalled network, the security proxy requests that the
         necessary pinholes in the firewall are opened when a client in
         the protected network wants to access media streams on the
         external side.  This proxy can perform its function without
         redirecting the media between the server and client.  However,
         in deployments with private address spaces, this proxy is
         likely to be combined with the access proxy.  The functionality
         of this proxy is usually closely tied into understanding all
         aspects of the media transport.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 103]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Auditing Proxy:  RTSP proxies can also provide network owners with a
         logging and auditing point for RTSP sessions, e.g., for
         corporations that track their employees usage of the network.
         This type of proxy can perform its function without inserting
         itself or any other node in the media transport.  This proxy
         type can also accept unknown methods as it doesn't interfere
         with the clients' requests.

   All types of proxies can also be used when using secured
   communication with TLS, as RTSP 2.0 allows the client to approve
   certificate chains used for connection establishment from a proxy;
   see Section 19.3.2.  However, that trust model may not be suitable
   for all types of deployment.  In those cases, the secured sessions do
   bypass the proxies.

   Access proxies SHOULD NOT be used in equipment like NATs and
   firewalls that aren't expected to be regularly maintained, like home
   or small office equipment.  In these cases, it is better to use the
   NAT traversal procedures defined for RTSP 2.0 [RFC7825].  The reason
   for these recommendations is that any extensions of RTSP resulting in
   new media-transport protocols or profiles, new parameters, etc., may
   fail in a proxy that isn't maintained.  This would impede RTSP's
   future development and usage.

15.1.  Proxies and Protocol Extensions

   The existence of proxies must always be considered when developing
   new RTSP extensions.  Most types of proxies will need to implement
   any new method to operate correctly in the presence of that
   extension.  New headers can be introduced and will not be blocked by
   older proxies.  However, it is important to consider if this header
   and its function are required to be understood by the proxy or if it
   can be simply forwarded.  If the header needs to be understood, a
   feature tag representing the functionality MUST be included in the
   Proxy-Require header.  Below are guidelines for analysis whether the
   header needs to be understood.  The Transport header and its
   parameters are extensible, which requires handling rules for a proxy
   in order to ensure a correct interpretation.













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 104]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Whether or not a proxy needs to understand a header is not easy to
   determine as they serve a broad variety of functions.  When
   evaluating if a header needs to be understood, one can divide the
   functionality into three main categories:

   Media modifying:  The caching and translator proxies modify the
      actual media and therefore need also to understand the request
      directed to the server that affects how the media is rendered.
      Thus, this type of proxy also needs to understand the server-side
      functionality.

   Transport modifying:  The access and the security proxy both need to
      understand how the media transport is performed, either for
      opening pinholes or translating the outer headers, e.g., IP and
      UDP or TCP.

   Non-modifying:  The audit proxy is special in that it does not modify
      the messages in other ways than to insert the Via header.  That
      makes it possible for this type to forward RTSP messages that
      contain different types of unknown methods, headers, or header
      parameters.

   An extension has to be classified as mandatory to be implemented for
   a proxy, if an extension has to be understood by a "Transport
   modifying" type of proxy.

15.2.  Multiplexing and Demultiplexing of Messages

   RTSP proxies may have to multiplex several RTSP sessions from their
   clients towards RTSP servers.  This requires that RTSP requests from
   multiple clients be multiplexed onto a common connection for requests
   outgoing to an RTSP server, and, on the way back, the responses be
   demultiplexed from the server to per-client responses.  On the
   protocol level, this requires that request and response messages be
   handled in both directions, requiring that there be a mechanism to
   correlate which request/response pair exchanged between proxy and
   server is mapped to which client (or client request).

   This multiplexing of requests and demultiplexing of responses is done
   by using the CSeq header field.  The proxy has to rewrite the CSeq in
   requests to the server and responses from the server and remember
   which CSeq is mapped to which client.  The proxy also needs to ensure
   that the order of the message related to each client is maintained.
   Section 18.20 defines the handling of how requests and responses are
   rewritten.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 105]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


16.  Caching

   In HTTP, request/response pairs are cached.  RTSP differs
   significantly in that respect.  Responses are not cacheable, with the
   exception of the presentation description returned by DESCRIBE.
   (Since the responses for anything but DESCRIBE and GET_PARAMETER do
   not return any data, caching is not really an issue for these
   requests.)  However, it is desirable for the continuous media data,
   typically delivered out-of-band with respect to RTSP, to be cached,
   as well as the session description.

   On receiving a SETUP or PLAY request, a proxy ascertains whether it
   has an up-to-date copy of the continuous media content and its
   description.  It can determine whether the copy is up to date by
   issuing a SETUP or DESCRIBE request, respectively, and comparing the
   Last-Modified header with that of the cached copy.  If the copy is
   not up to date, it modifies the SETUP transport parameters as
   appropriate and forwards the request to the origin server.
   Subsequent control commands such as PLAY or PAUSE then pass the proxy
   unmodified.  The proxy delivers the continuous media data to the
   client, while possibly making a local copy for later reuse.  The
   exact allowed behavior of the cache is given by the cache-response
   directives described in Section 18.11.  A cache MUST answer any
   DESCRIBE requests if it is currently serving the stream to the
   requester, as it is possible that low-level details of the stream
   description may have changed on the origin server.

   Note that an RTSP cache is of the "cut-through" variety.  Rather than
   retrieving the whole resource from the origin server, the cache
   simply copies the streaming data as it passes by on its way to the
   client.  Thus, it does not introduce additional latency.

   To the client, an RTSP proxy cache appears like a regular media
   server.  To the media origin server, an RTSP proxy cache appears like
   a client.  Just as an HTTP cache has to store the content type,
   content language, and so on for the objects it caches, a media cache
   has to store the presentation description.  Typically, a cache
   eliminates all transport references (e.g., multicast information)
   from the presentation description, since these are independent of the
   data delivery from the cache to the client.  Information on the
   encodings remains the same.  If the cache is able to translate the
   cached media data, it would create a new presentation description
   with all the encoding possibilities it can offer.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 106]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


16.1.  Validation Model

   When a cache has a stale entry that it would like to use as a
   response to a client's request, it first has to check with the origin
   server (or possibly an intermediate cache with a fresh response) to
   see if its cached entry is still usable.  This is called "validating"
   the cache entry.  To avoid having to pay the overhead of
   retransmitting the full response if the cached entry is good, and at
   the same time avoiding having to pay the overhead of an extra round
   trip if the cached entry is invalid, RTSP supports the use of
   conditional methods.

   The key protocol features for supporting conditional methods are
   those concerned with "cache validators."  When an origin server
   generates a full response, it attaches some sort of validator to it,
   which is kept with the cache entry.  When a client (user agent or
   proxy cache) makes a conditional request for a resource for which it
   has a cache entry, it includes the associated validator in the
   request.

   The server then checks that validator against the current validator
   for the requested resource, and, if they match (see Section 16.1.3),
   it responds with a special status code (usually, 304 (Not Modified))
   and no message body.  Otherwise, it returns a full response
   (including message body).  Thus, avoiding transmitting the full
   response if the validator matches and avoiding an extra round trip if
   it does not match.

   In RTSP, a conditional request looks exactly the same as a normal
   request for the same resource, except that it carries a special
   header (which includes the validator) that implicitly turns the
   method (usually DESCRIBE or SETUP) into a conditional.

   The protocol includes both positive and negative senses of cache-
   validating conditions.  That is, it is possible to request that a
   method be performed either if and only if a validator matches or if
   and only if no validators match.

      Note: a response that lacks a validator may still be cached, and
      served from cache until it expires, unless this is explicitly
      prohibited by a cache directive (see Section 18.11).  However, a
      cache cannot perform a conditional retrieval if it does not have a
      validator for the resource, which means it will not be refreshable
      after it expires.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 107]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Media streams that are being adapted based on the transport capacity
   between the server and the cache make caching more difficult.  A
   server needs to consider how it views the caching of media streams
   that it adapts and potentially instruct any caches not to cache such
   streams.

16.1.1.  Last-Modified Dates

   The Last-Modified header (Section 18.27) value is often used as a
   cache validator.  In simple terms, a cache entry is considered to be
   valid if the cache entry was created after the Last-Modified time.

16.1.2.  Message Body Tag Cache Validators

   The MTag response-header field-value, a message body tag, provides
   for an "opaque" cache validator.  This might allow more reliable
   validation in situations where it is inconvenient to store
   modification dates, where the one-second resolution of RTSP-date
   values is not sufficient, or where the origin server wishes to avoid
   certain paradoxes that might arise from the use of modification
   dates.

   Message body tags are described in Section 4.6

16.1.3.  Weak and Strong Validators

   Since both origin servers and caches will compare two validators to
   decide if they represent the same or different entities, one normally
   would expect that if the message body (i.e., the presentation
   description) or any associated message body headers changes in any
   way, then the associated validator would change as well.  If this is
   true, then this validator is a "strong validator".  The Message body
   (i.e., the presentation description) or any associated message body
   headers is named an entity for a better understanding.

   However, there might be cases when a server prefers to change the
   validator only on semantically significant changes and not when
   insignificant aspects of the entity change.  A validator that does
   not always change when the resource changes is a "weak validator".

   Message body tags are normally strong validators, but the protocol
   provides a mechanism to tag a message body tag as "weak".  One can
   think of a strong validator as one that changes whenever the bits of
   an entity changes, while a weak value changes whenever the meaning of
   an entity changes.  Alternatively, one can think of a strong
   validator as part of an identifier for a specific entity, while a
   weak validator is part of an identifier for a set of semantically
   equivalent entities.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 108]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      Note: One example of a strong validator is an integer that is
      incremented in stable storage every time an entity is changed.

      An entity's modification time, if represented with one-second
      resolution, could be a weak validator, since it is possible that
      the resource might be modified twice during a single second.

      Support for weak validators is optional.  However, weak validators
      allow for more efficient caching of equivalent objects.

   A "use" of a validator is either when a client generates a request
   and includes the validator in a validating header field or when a
   server compares two validators.

   Strong validators are usable in any context.  Weak validators are
   only usable in contexts that do not depend on exact equality of an
   entity.  For example, either kind is usable for a conditional
   DESCRIBE of a full entity.  However, only a strong validator is
   usable for a subrange retrieval, since otherwise the client might end
   up with an internally inconsistent entity.

   Clients MAY issue DESCRIBE requests with either weak or strong
   validators.  Clients MUST NOT use weak validators in other forms of
   requests.

   The only function that RTSP defines on validators is comparison.
   There are two validator comparison functions, depending on whether or
   not the comparison context allows the use of weak validators:

   o  The strong comparison function: in order to be considered equal,
      both validators MUST be identical in every way, and both MUST NOT
      be weak.

   o  The weak comparison function: in order to be considered equal,
      both validators MUST be identical in every way, but either or both
      of them MAY be tagged as "weak" without affecting the result.

   A message body tag is strong unless it is explicitly tagged as weak.

   A Last-Modified time, when used as a validator in a request, is
   implicitly weak unless it is possible to deduce that it is strong,
   using the following rules:

   o  The validator is being compared by an origin server to the actual
      current validator for the entity and,






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 109]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  That origin server reliably knows that the associated entity did
      not change more than once during the second covered by the
      presented validator.

   OR

   o  The validator is about to be used by a client in an If-Modified-
      Since, because the client has a cache entry for the associated
      entity, and

   o  That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time when
      the origin server sent the original response, and

   o  The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the
      Date value.

   OR

   o  The validator is being compared by an intermediate cache to the
      validator stored in its cache entry for the entity, and

   o  That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time when
      the origin server sent the original response, and

   o  The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the
      Date value.

   This method relies on the fact that if two different responses were
   sent by the origin server during the same second, but both had the
   same Last-Modified time, then at least one of those responses would
   have a Date value equal to its Last-Modified time.  The arbitrary
   60-second limit guards against the possibility that the Date and
   Last-Modified values are generated from different clocks or at
   somewhat different times during the preparation of the response.  An
   implementation MAY use a value larger than 60 seconds, if it is
   believed that 60 seconds is too short.

   If a client wishes to perform a subrange retrieval on a value for
   which it has only a Last-Modified time and no opaque validator, it
   MAY do this only if the Last-Modified time is strong in the sense
   described here.

16.1.4.  Rules for When to Use Message Body Tags and Last-Modified Dates

   This document adopts a set of rules and recommendations for origin
   servers, clients, and caches regarding when various validator types
   ought to be used, and for what purposes.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 110]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTSP origin servers:

   o  SHOULD send a message body tag validator unless it is not feasible
      to generate one.

   o  MAY send a weak message body tag instead of a strong message body
      tag, if performance considerations support the use of weak message
      body tags, or if it is unfeasible to send a strong message body
      tag.

   o  SHOULD send a Last-Modified value if it is feasible to send one,
      unless the risk of a breakdown in semantic transparency that could
      result from using this date in an If-Modified-Since header would
      lead to serious problems.
   In other words, the preferred behavior for an RTSP origin server is
   to send both a strong message body tag and a Last-Modified value.

   In order to be legal, a strong message body tag MUST change whenever
   the associated entity value changes in any way.  A weak message body
   tag SHOULD change whenever the associated entity changes in a
   semantically significant way.

      Note: in order to provide semantically transparent caching, an
      origin server MUST avoid reusing a specific strong message body
      tag value for two different entities or reusing a specific weak
      message body tag value for two semantically different entities.
      Cache entries might persist for arbitrarily long periods,
      regardless of expiration times, so it might be inappropriate to
      expect that a cache will never again attempt to validate an entry
      using a validator that it obtained at some point in the past.

   RTSP clients:

   o  If a message body tag has been provided by the origin server, MUST
      use that message body tag in any cache-conditional request (using
      If-Match or If-None-Match).

   o  If only a Last-Modified value has been provided by the origin
      server, SHOULD use that value in non-subrange cache-conditional
      requests (using If-Modified-Since).

   o  If both a message body tag and a Last-Modified value have been
      provided by the origin server, SHOULD use both validators in
      cache-conditional requests.

   An RTSP origin server, upon receiving a conditional request that
   includes both a Last-Modified date (e.g., in an If-Modified-Since
   header) and one or more message body tags (e.g., in an If-Match,



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 111]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   If-None-Match, or If-Range header field) as cache validators, MUST
   NOT return a response status of 304 (Not Modified) unless doing so is
   consistent with all of the conditional header fields in the request.

      Note: The general principle behind these rules is that RTSP
      servers and clients should transmit as much non-redundant
      information as is available in their responses and requests.  RTSP
      systems receiving this information will make the most conservative
      assumptions about the validators they receive.

16.1.5.  Non-validating Conditionals

   The principle behind message body tags is that only the service
   author knows the semantics of a resource well enough to select an
   appropriate cache validation mechanism, and the specification of any
   validator comparison function more complex than octet equality would
   open up a can of worms.  Thus, comparisons of any other headers are
   never used for purposes of validating a cache entry.

16.2.  Invalidation after Updates or Deletions

   The effect of certain methods performed on a resource at the origin
   server might cause one or more existing cache entries to become non-
   transparently invalid.  That is, although they might continue to be
   "fresh," they do not accurately reflect what the origin server would
   return for a new request on that resource.

   There is no way for RTSP to guarantee that all such cache entries are
   marked invalid.  For example, the request that caused the change at
   the origin server might not have gone through the proxy where a cache
   entry is stored.  However, several rules help reduce the likelihood
   of erroneous behavior.

   In this section, the phrase "invalidate an entity" means that the
   cache will either remove all instances of that entity from its
   storage or mark these as "invalid" and in need of a mandatory
   revalidation before they can be returned in response to a subsequent
   request.

   Some RTSP methods MUST cause a cache to invalidate an entity.  This
   is either the entity referred to by the Request-URI or by the
   Location or Content-Location headers (if present).  These methods
   are:

   o  DESCRIBE

   o  SETUP




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 112]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   In order to prevent DoS attacks, an invalidation based on the URI in
   a Location or Content-Location header MUST only be performed if the
   host part is the same as in the Request-URI.

   A cache that passes through requests for methods it does not
   understand SHOULD invalidate any entities referred to by the Request-
   URI.

17.  Status Code Definitions

   Where applicable, HTTP status codes (see Section 6 of [RFC7231]) are
   reused.  See Table 4 in Section 8.1 for a listing of which status
   codes may be returned by which requests.  All error messages, 4xx and
   5xx, MAY return a body containing further information about the
   error.

17.1.  Informational 1xx

17.1.1.  100 Continue

   The requesting agent SHOULD continue with its request.  This interim
   response is used to inform the requesting agent that the initial part
   of the request has been received and has not yet been rejected by the
   responding agent.  The requesting agent SHOULD continue by sending
   the remainder of the request or, if the request has already been
   completed, continue to wait for a final response (see Section 10.4).
   The responding agent MUST send a final response after the request has
   been completed.

17.2.  Success 2xx

   This class of status code indicates that the agent's request was
   successfully received, understood, and accepted.

17.2.1.  200 OK

   The request has succeeded.  The information returned with the
   response is dependent on the method used in the request.

17.3.  Redirection 3xx

   The notation "3xx" indicates response codes from 300 to 399 inclusive
   that are meant for redirection.  We use the notation "3rr" to
   indicate all 3xx codes used for redirection, i.e., excluding 304.
   The 304 response code appears here, rather than a 2xx response code,
   which would have been appropriate; 304 has also been used in RTSP 1.0
   [RFC2326].




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 113]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Within RTSP, redirection may be used for load-balancing or
   redirecting stream requests to a server topologically closer to the
   agent.  Mechanisms to determine topological proximity are beyond the
   scope of this specification.

   A 3rr code MAY be used to respond to any request.  The Location
   header MUST be included in any 3rr response.  It is RECOMMENDED that
   they are used if necessary before a session is established, i.e., in
   response to DESCRIBE or SETUP.  However, in cases where a server is
   not able to send a REDIRECT request to the agent, the server MAY need
   to resort to using 3rr responses to inform an agent with an
   established session about the need for redirecting the session.  If a
   3rr response is received for a request in relation to an established
   session, the agent SHOULD send a TEARDOWN request for the session and
   MAY reestablish the session using the resource indicated by the
   Location.

   If the Location header is used in a response, it MUST contain an
   absolute URI pointing out the media resource the agent is redirected
   to; the URI MUST NOT only contain the hostname.

   In the event that an unknown 3rr status code is received, the agent
   SHOULD behave as if a 302 response code had been received
   (Section 17.3.3).

17.3.1.  300

   The 300 response code is not used in RTSP 2.0.

17.3.2.  301 Moved Permanently

   The requested resource is moved permanently and resides now at the
   URI given by the Location header.  The user agent SHOULD redirect
   automatically to the given URI.  This response MUST NOT contain a
   message body.  The Location header MUST be included in the response.

17.3.3.  302 Found

   The requested resource resides temporarily at the URI given by the
   Location header.  This response is intended to be used for many types
   of temporary redirects, e.g., load balancing.  It is RECOMMENDED that
   the server set the reason phrase to something more meaningful than
   "Found" in these cases.  The Location header MUST be included in the
   response.  The user agent SHOULD redirect automatically to the given
   URI.  This response MUST NOT contain a message body.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 114]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This example shows a client being redirected to a different server:

     C->S: SETUP rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1
           Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 302 Try Other Server
           CSeq: 2
           Location: rtsp://s2.example.com:8001/fizzle/foo

17.3.4.  303 See Other

   This status code MUST NOT be used in RTSP 2.0.  However, it was
   allowed in RTSP 1.0 [RFC2326].

17.3.5.  304 Not Modified

   If the agent has performed a conditional DESCRIBE or SETUP (see
   Sections 18.25 and 18.26) and the requested resource has not been
   modified, the server SHOULD send a 304 response.  This response MUST
   NOT contain a message body.

   The response MUST include the following header fields:

   o  Date

   o  MTag or Content-Location, if the headers would have been sent in a
      200 response to the same request.

   o  Expires and Cache-Control if the field-value might differ from
      that sent in any previous response for the same variant.

   This response is independent for the DESCRIBE and SETUP requests.
   That is, a 304 response to DESCRIBE does NOT imply that the resource
   content is unchanged (only the session description) and a 304
   response to SETUP does NOT imply that the resource description is
   unchanged.  The MTag and If-Match header (Section 18.24) may be used
   to link the DESCRIBE and SETUP in this manner.

17.3.6.  305 Use Proxy

   The requested resource MUST be accessed through the proxy given by
   the Location header that MUST be included.  The Location header
   field-value gives the URI of the proxy.  The recipient is expected to
   repeat this single request via the proxy. 305 responses MUST only be
   generated by origin servers.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 115]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


17.4.  Client Error 4xx

17.4.1.  400 Bad Request

   The request could not be understood by the agent due to malformed
   syntax.  The agent SHOULD NOT repeat the request without
   modifications.  If the request does not have a CSeq header, the agent
   MUST NOT include a CSeq in the response.

17.4.2.  401 Unauthorized

   The request requires user authentication using the HTTP
   authentication mechanism [RFC7235].  The usage of the error code is
   defined in [RFC7235] and any applicable HTTP authentication scheme,
   such as Digest [RFC7616].  The response is to include a WWW-
   Authenticate header (Section 18.58) field containing a challenge
   applicable to the requested resource.  The agent can repeat the
   request with a suitable Authorization header field.  If the request
   already included authorization credentials, then the 401 response
   indicates that authorization has been refused for those credentials.
   If the 401 response contains the same challenge as the prior
   response, and the user agent has already attempted authentication at
   least once, then the user SHOULD be presented the message body that
   was given in the response, since that message body might include
   relevant diagnostic information.

17.4.3.  402 Payment Required

   This code is reserved for future use.

17.4.4.  403 Forbidden

   The agent understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
   Authorization will not help, and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated.
   If the agent wishes to make public why the request has not been
   fulfilled, it SHOULD describe the reason for the refusal in the
   message body.  If the agent does not wish to make this information
   available to the agent, the status code 404 (Not Found) can be used
   instead.

17.4.5.  404 Not Found

   The agent has not found anything matching the Request-URI.  No
   indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or
   permanent.  The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the agent
   knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old
   resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 116]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This status code is commonly used when the agent does not wish to
   reveal exactly why the request has been refused, or when no other
   response is applicable.

17.4.6.  405 Method Not Allowed

   The method specified in the request is not allowed for the resource
   identified by the Request-URI.  The response MUST include an Allow
   header containing a list of valid methods for the requested resource.
   This status code is also to be used if a request attempts to use a
   method not indicated during SETUP.

17.4.7.  406 Not Acceptable

   The resource identified by the request is only capable of generating
   response message bodies that have content characteristics not
   acceptable according to the Accept headers sent in the request.

   The response SHOULD include a message body containing a list of
   available message body characteristics and location(s) from which the
   user or user agent can choose the one most appropriate.  The message
   body format is specified by the media type given in the Content-Type
   header field.  Depending upon the format and the capabilities of the
   user agent, selection of the most appropriate choice MAY be performed
   automatically.  However, this specification does not define any
   standard for such automatic selection.

   If the response could be unacceptable, a user agent SHOULD
   temporarily stop receipt of more data and query the user for a
   decision on further actions.

17.4.8.  407 Proxy Authentication Required

   This code is similar to 401 (Unauthorized) (Section 17.4.2), but it
   indicates that the client must first authenticate itself with the
   proxy.  The usage of this error code is defined in [RFC7235] and any
   applicable HTTP authentication scheme, such as Digest [RFC7616].  The
   proxy MUST return a Proxy-Authenticate header field (Section 18.34)
   containing a challenge applicable to the proxy for the requested
   resource.

17.4.9.  408 Request Timeout

   The agent did not produce a request within the time that the agent
   was prepared to wait.  The agent MAY repeat the request without
   modifications at any later time.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 117]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


17.4.10.  410 Gone

   The requested resource is no longer available at the server and the
   forwarding address is not known.  This condition is expected to be
   considered permanent.  If the server does not know, or has no
   facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the
   status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead.  This response is
   cacheable unless indicated otherwise.

   The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of
   repository maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource
   is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that
   remote links to that resource be removed.  Such an event is common
   for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to
   individuals no longer working at the server's site.  It is not
   necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as "gone" or
   to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the
   discretion of the owner of the server.

17.4.11.  412 Precondition Failed

   The precondition given in one or more of the 'if-' request-header
   fields evaluated to false when it was tested on the agent.  See these
   sections for the 'if-' headers: If-Match Section 18.24, If-Modified-
   Since Section 18.25, and If-None-Match Section 18.26.  This response
   code allows the agent to place preconditions on the current resource
   meta-information (header field data) and, thus, prevent the requested
   method from being applied to a resource other than the one intended.

17.4.12.  413 Request Message Body Too Large

   The agent is refusing to process a request because the request
   message body is larger than the agent is willing or able to process.
   The agent MAY close the connection to prevent the requesting agent
   from continuing the request.

   If the condition is temporary, the agent SHOULD include a Retry-After
   header field to indicate that it is temporary and after what time the
   requesting agent MAY try again.

17.4.13.  414 Request-URI Too Long

   The responding agent is refusing to service the request because the
   Request-URI is longer than the agent is willing to interpret.  This
   rare condition is only likely to occur when an agent has used a
   request with long query information, when the agent has descended
   into a URI "black hole" of redirection (e.g., a redirected URI prefix
   that points to a suffix of itself), or when the agent is under attack



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 118]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   by an agent attempting to exploit security holes present in some
   agents using fixed-length buffers for reading or manipulating the
   Request-URI.

17.4.14.  415 Unsupported Media Type

   The server is refusing to service the request because the message
   body of the request is in a format not supported by the requested
   resource for the requested method.

17.4.15.  451 Parameter Not Understood

   The recipient of the request does not support one or more parameters
   contained in the request.  When returning this error message the
   agent SHOULD return a message body containing the offending
   parameter(s).

17.4.16.  452 Illegal Conference Identifier

   This status code MUST NOT be used in RTSP 2.0.  However, it was
   allowed in RTSP 1.0 [RFC2326].

17.4.17.  453 Not Enough Bandwidth

   The request was refused because there was insufficient bandwidth.
   This may, for example, be the result of a resource reservation
   failure.

17.4.18.  454 Session Not Found

   The RTSP session identifier in the Session header is missing, is
   invalid, or has timed out.

17.4.19.  455 Method Not Valid in This State

   The agent cannot process this request in its current state.  The
   response MUST contain an Allow header to make error recovery
   possible.

17.4.20.  456 Header Field Not Valid for Resource

   The targeted agent could not act on a required request-header.  For
   example, if PLAY request contains the Range header field but the
   stream does not allow seeking.  This error message may also be used
   for specifying when the time format in Range is impossible for the
   resource.  In that case, the Accept-Ranges header MUST be returned to
   inform the agent of which formats are allowed.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 119]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


17.4.21.  457 Invalid Range

   The Range value given is out of bounds, e.g., beyond the end of the
   presentation.

17.4.22.  458 Parameter Is Read-Only

   The parameter to be set by SET_PARAMETER can be read but not
   modified.  When returning this error message, the sender SHOULD
   return a message body containing the offending parameter(s).

17.4.23.  459 Aggregate Operation Not Allowed

   The requested method may not be applied on the URI in question since
   it is an aggregate (presentation) URI.  The method may be applied on
   a media URI.

17.4.24.  460 Only Aggregate Operation Allowed

   The requested method may not be applied on the URI in question since
   it is not an aggregate control (presentation) URI.  The method may be
   applied on the aggregate control URI.

17.4.25.  461 Unsupported Transport

   The Transport field did not contain a supported transport
   specification.

17.4.26.  462 Destination Unreachable

   The data transmission channel could not be established because the
   agent address could not be reached.  This error will most likely be
   the result of an agent attempt to place an invalid dest_addr
   parameter in the Transport field.

17.4.27.  463 Destination Prohibited

   The data transmission channel was not established because the server
   prohibited access to the agent address.  This error is most likely
   the result of an agent attempt to redirect media traffic to another
   destination with a dest_addr parameter in the Transport header.










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 120]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


17.4.28.  464 Data Transport Not Ready Yet

   The data transmission channel to the media destination is not yet
   ready for carrying data.  However, the responding agent still expects
   that the data transmission channel will be established at some point
   in time.  Note, however, that this may result in a permanent failure
   like 462 (Destination Unreachable).

   An example of when this error may occur is in the case in which a
   client sends a PLAY request to a server prior to ensuring that the
   TCP connections negotiated for carrying media data were successfully
   established (in violation of this specification).  The server would
   use this error code to indicate that the requested action could not
   be performed due to the failure of completing the connection
   establishment.

17.4.29.  465 Notification Reason Unknown

   This indicates that the client has received a PLAY_NOTIFY
   (Section 13.5) with a Notify-Reason header (Section 18.32) unknown to
   the client.

17.4.30.  466 Key Management Error

   This indicates that there has been an error in a Key Management
   function used in conjunction with a request.  For example, usage of
   Multimedia Internet KEYing (MIKEY) [RFC3830] according to
   Appendix C.1.4.1 may result in this error.

17.4.31.  470 Connection Authorization Required

   The secured connection attempt needs user or client authorization
   before proceeding.  The next hop's certificate is included in this
   response in the Accept-Credentials header.

17.4.32.  471 Connection Credentials Not Accepted

   When performing a secure connection over multiple connections, an
   intermediary has refused to connect to the next hop and carry out the
   request due to unacceptable credentials for the used policy.

17.4.33.  472 Failure to Establish Secure Connection

   A proxy fails to establish a secure connection to the next-hop RTSP
   agent.  This is primarily caused by a fatal failure at the TLS
   handshake, for example, due to the agent not accepting any cipher
   suites.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 121]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


17.5.  Server Error 5xx

   Response status codes beginning with the digit "5" indicate cases in
   which the server is aware that it has erred or is incapable of
   performing the request.  The server SHOULD include a message body
   containing an explanation of the error situation and whether it is a
   temporary or permanent condition.  User agents SHOULD display any
   included message body to the user.  These response codes are
   applicable to any request method.

17.5.1.  500 Internal Server Error

   The agent encountered an unexpected condition that prevented it from
   fulfilling the request.

17.5.2.  501 Not Implemented

   The agent does not support the functionality required to fulfill the
   request.  This is the appropriate response when the agent does not
   recognize the request method and is not capable of supporting it for
   any resource.

17.5.3.  502 Bad Gateway

   The agent, while acting as a gateway or proxy, received an invalid
   response from the upstream agent it accessed in attempting to fulfill
   the request.

17.5.4.  503 Service Unavailable

   The server is currently unable to handle the request due to a
   temporary overloading or maintenance of the server.  The implication
   is that this is a temporary condition that will be alleviated after
   some delay.  If known, the length of the delay MAY be indicated in a
   Retry-After header.  If no Retry-After is given, the agent SHOULD
   handle the response as it would for a 500 response.  The agent MUST
   honor the length, if given, in the Retry-After header.

         Note: The existence of the 503 status code does not imply that
         a server must use it when becoming overloaded.  Some servers
         may wish to simply refuse the transport connection.

   The response scope is dependent on the request.  If the request was
   in relation to an existing RTSP session, the scope of the overload
   response is to this individual RTSP session.  If the request was not
   session specific or intended to form an RTSP session, it applies to
   the RTSP server identified by the hostname in the Request-URI.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 122]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


17.5.5.  504 Gateway Timeout

   The agent, while acting as a proxy, did not receive a timely response
   from the upstream agent specified by the URI or some other auxiliary
   server (e.g., DNS) that it needed to access in attempting to complete
   the request.

17.5.6.  505 RTSP Version Not Supported

   The agent does not support, or refuses to support, the RTSP version
   that was used in the request message.  The agent is indicating that
   it is unable or unwilling to complete the request using the same
   major version as the agent other than with this error message.  The
   response SHOULD contain a message body describing why that version is
   not supported and what other protocols are supported by that agent.

17.5.7.  551 Option Not Supported

   A feature tag given in the Require or the Proxy-Require fields was
   not supported.  The Unsupported header MUST be returned stating the
   feature for which there is no support.

17.5.8.  553 Proxy Unavailable

   The proxy is currently unable to handle the request due to a
   temporary overloading or maintenance of the proxy.  The implication
   is that this is a temporary condition that will be alleviated after
   some delay.  If known, the length of the delay MAY be indicated in a
   Retry-After header.  If no Retry-After is given, the agent SHOULD
   handle the response as it would for a 500 response.  The agent MUST
   honor the length, if given in the Retry-After header.

         Note: The existence of the 553 status code does not imply that
         a proxy must use it when becoming overloaded.  Some proxies may
         wish to simply refuse the connection.

   The response scope is dependent on the Request.  If the request was
   in relation to an existing RTSP session, the scope of the overload
   response is to this individual RTSP session.  If the request was non-
   session specific or intended to form an RTSP session, it applies to
   all such requests to this proxy.










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 123]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.  Header Field Definitions

       +---------------+----------------+--------+---------+------+
       | method        | direction      | object | acronym | Body |
       +---------------+----------------+--------+---------+------+
       | DESCRIBE      | C -> S         | P,S    | DES     | r    |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | GET_PARAMETER | C -> S, S -> C | P,S    | GPR     | R,r  |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | OPTIONS       | C -> S, S -> C | P,S    | OPT     |      |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | PAUSE         | C -> S         | P,S    | PSE     |      |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | PLAY          | C -> S         | P,S    | PLY     |      |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | PLAY_NOTIFY   | S -> C         | P,S    | PNY     | R    |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | REDIRECT      | S -> C         | P,S    | RDR     |      |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | SETUP         | C -> S         | S      | STP     |      |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | SET_PARAMETER | C -> S, S -> C | P,S    | SPR     | R,r  |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       | TEARDOWN      | C -> S         | P,S    | TRD     |      |
       |               |                |        |         |      |
       |               | S -> C         | P      | TRD     |      |
       +---------------+----------------+--------+---------+------+

   This table is an overview of RTSP methods, their direction, and what
   objects (P: presentation, S: stream) they operate on.  "Body" denotes
     if a method is allowed to carry body and in which direction; R =
    request, r=response.  Note: All error messages for statuses 4xx and
                     5xx are allowed to carry a body.

                     Table 8: Overview of RTSP Methods

   The general syntax for header fields is covered in Section 5.2.  This
   section lists the full set of header fields along with notes on
   meaning and usage.  The syntax definitions for header fields are
   present in Section 20.2.3.  Examples of each header field are given.

   Information about header fields in relation to methods and proxy
   processing is summarized in Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 124]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The "where" column describes the request and response types in which
   the header field can be used.  Values in this column are:

   R:                header field may only appear in requests;

   r:                header field may only appear in responses;

   2xx, 4xx, etc.:   numerical value or range indicates response codes
                     with which the header field can be used;

   c:                header field is copied from the request to the
                     response.

   G:                header field is a general-header and may be present
                     in both requests and responses.

   Note: General headers do not always use the "G" value in the "where"
   column.  This is due to differences when the header may be applied in
   requests compared to responses.  When such differences exist, they
   are expressed using two different rows: one with "where" being "R"
   and one with it being "r".

   The "proxy" column describes the operations a proxy may perform on a
   header field.  An empty proxy column indicates that the proxy MUST
   NOT make any changes to that header, all allowed operations are
   explicitly stated:

   a:    A proxy can add or concatenate the header field if not present.

   m:    A proxy can modify an existing header field value.

   d:    A proxy can delete a header field-value.

   r:    A proxy needs to be able to read the header field; thus, this
         header field cannot be encrypted.

   The rest of the columns relate to the presence of a header field in a
   method.  The method names when abbreviated, are according to Table 8:

   c:    Conditional; requirements on the header field depend on the
         context of the message.

   m:    The header field is mandatory.

   m*:   The header field SHOULD be sent, but agents need to be prepared
         to receive messages without that header field.

   o:    The header field is optional.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 125]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   *:    The header field MUST be present if the message body is not
         empty.  See Sections 18.17, 18.19 and 5.3 for details.

   -:    The header field is not applicable.

   "Optional" means that an agent MAY include the header field in a
   request or response.  The agent behavior when receiving such headers
   varies; for some, it may ignore the header field.  In other cases, it
   is a request to process the header.  This is regulated by the method
   and header descriptions.  Examples of headers that require processing
   are the Require and Proxy-Require header fields discussed in Sections
   18.43 and 18.37.  A "mandatory" header field MUST be present in a
   request, and it MUST be understood by the agent receiving the
   request.  A mandatory response-header field MUST be present in the
   response, and the header field MUST be understood by the processing
   the response.  "Not applicable" means that the header field MUST NOT
   be present in a request.  If one is placed in a request by mistake,
   it MUST be ignored by the agent receiving the request.  Similarly, a
   header field labeled "not applicable" for a response means that the
   agent MUST NOT place the header field in the response, and the agent
   MUST ignore the header field in the response.

   An RTSP agent MUST ignore extension headers that are not understood.

   The From and Location header fields contain a URI.  If the URI
   contains a comma (') or semicolon (;), the URI MUST be enclosed in
   double quotes (").  Any URI parameters are contained within these
   quotes.  If the URI is not enclosed in double quotes, any semicolon-
   delimited parameters are header-parameters, not URI parameters.






















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 126]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   +-------------------+------+------+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Header            |Where |Proxy |DES | OPT| STP | PLY | PSE | TRD |
   +-------------------+------+------+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Accept            | R    |      | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Accept-           | R    | rm   | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   | Credentials       |      |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Accept-Encoding   | R    | r    | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Accept-Language   | R    | r    | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Accept-Ranges     | G    | r    | -  | -  | m   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Accept-Ranges     | 456  | r    | -  | -  | -   | m   | -   | -   |
   | Allow             | r    | am   | c  | c  | c   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Allow             | 405  | am   | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   | m   |
   | Authentication-   | r    |      | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o/- |
   | Info              |      |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Authorization     | R    |      | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o/- |
   | Bandwidth         | R    |      | o  | o  | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Blocksize         | R    |      | o  | -  | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Cache-Control     | G    | r    | o  | -  | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Connection        | G    | ad   | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   | Connection-       | 470, | ar   | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   | Credentials       | 407  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Base      | r    |      | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Base      | 4xx, |      | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                   | 5xx  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Encoding  | R    | r    | -  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Encoding  | r    | r    | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Encoding  | 4xx, | r    | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                   | 5xx  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Language  | R    | r    | -  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Language  | r    | r    | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Language  | 4xx, | r    | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                   | 5xx  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Length    | r    | r    | *  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Length    | 4xx, | r    | *  | *  | *   | *   | *   | *   |
   |                   | 5xx  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Location  | r    | r    | o  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Location  | 4xx, | r    | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                   | 5xx  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Type      | r    | r    | *  | -  | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Type      | 4xx, | ar   | *  | *  | *   | *   | *   | *   |
   |                   | 5xx  |      |    |    |     |     |     |     |
   | CSeq              | Gc   | rm   | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   | m   |
   | Date              | G    | am   | o/*| o/*| o/* | o/* | o/* | o/* |
   | Expires           | r    | r    | o  | -  | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | From              | R    | r    | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   | If-Match          | R    | r    | -  | -  | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | If-Modified-Since | R    | r    | o  | -  | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | If-None-Match     | R    | r    | o  | -  | o   | -   | -   | -   |



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 127]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   | Last-Modified     | r    | r    | o  | -  | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Location          | 3rr  |      | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   | m   |
   +-------------------+------+------+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Header            |Where |Proxy |DES | OPT| STP | PLY | PSE | TRD |
   +-------------------+------+------+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

     Figure 2: Overview of RTSP Header Fields (A-L) Related to Methods
            DESCRIBE, OPTIONS, SETUP, PLAY, PAUSE, and TEARDOWN











































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 128]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   +------------------+---------+-----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Header           | Where   |Proxy|DES |OPT |STP | PLY | PSE | TRD |
   +------------------+---------+-----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Media-Properties | r       |     | -  | -  | m  | o   | o   | -   |
   | Media-Range      | r       |     | -  | -  | c  | c   | c   | -   |
   | MTag             | r       | r   | o  | -  | o  | -   | -   | -   |
   | Pipelined-       | G       | amd | -  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Requests         |         | r   |    |    |    |     |     |     |
   | Proxy-           | 407     | amr | m  | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   |
   | Authenticate     |         |     |    |    |    |     |     |     |
   | Proxy-           | r       | amd | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o/- |
   | Authentication-  |         | r   |    |    |    |     |     |     |
   | Info             |         |     |    |    |    |     |     |     |
   | Proxy-           | R       | rd  | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Authorization    |         |     |    |    |    |     |     |     |
   | Proxy-Require    | R       | ar  | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Proxy-Require    | r       | r   | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | Proxy-Supported  | R       | amr | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | Proxy-Supported  | r       |     | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | Public           | r       | amr | -  | m  | -  | -   | -   | -   |
   | Public           | 501     | amr | m  | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   |
   | Range            | R       |     | -  | -  | -  | o   | -   | -   |
   | Range            | r       |     | -  | -  | c  | m   | m   | -   |
   | Referrer         | R       |     | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Request-Status   | R       |     | -  | -  | -  | -   | -   | -   |
   | Require          | R       |     | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Retry-After      | 3rr,503 |     | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | -   |
   |                  | ,553    |     |    |    |    |     |     |     |
   | Retry-After      | 413     |     | o  | -  | -  | -   | -   | -   |
   | RTP-Info         | r       |     | -  | -  | c  | c   | -   | -   |
   | Scale            | R       | r   | -  | -  | -  | o   | -   | -   |
   | Scale            | r       | amr | -  | -  | c  | c   | c   | -   |
   | Seek-Style       | R       |     | -  | -  | -  | o   | -   | -   |
   | Seek-Style       | r       |     | -  | -  | -  | m   | -   | -   |
   | Server           | R       | r   | -  | o  | -  | -   | -   | o   |
   | Server           | r       | r   | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Session          | R       | r   | -  | o  | o  | m   | m   | m   |
   | Session          | r       | r   | -  | c  | m  | m   | m   | o   |
   | Speed            | R       | admr| -  | -  | -  | o   | -   | -   |
   | Speed            | r       | admr| -  | -  | -  | c   | -   | -   |
   | Supported        | R       | r   | o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Supported        | r       | r   | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | Terminate-Reason | R       | r   | -  | -  | -  | -   | -   | -/o |
   | Timestamp        | R       | admr| o  | o  | o  | o   | o   | o   |
   | Timestamp        | c       | admr| m  | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   |
   | Transport        | G       | mr  | -  | -  | m  | -   | -   | -   |
   | Unsupported      | r       |     | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | User-Agent       | R       |     | m* | m* | m* | m*  | m*  | m*  |



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 129]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   | Via              | R       | amr | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | Via              | r       | amr | c  | c  | c  | c   | c   | c   |
   | WWW-Authenticate | 401     |     | m  | m  | m  | m   | m   | m   |
   +------------------+---------+-----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Header           | Where   |Proxy|DES |OPT |STP | PLY | PSE | TRD |
   +------------------+---------+-----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+

     Figure 3: Overview of RTSP Header Fields (M-W) Related to Methods
            DESCRIBE, OPTIONS, SETUP, PLAY, PAUSE, and TEARDOWN










































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 130]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   +---------------------------+-------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Header                    | Where | Proxy | GPR | SPR | RDR | PNY |
   +---------------------------+-------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Accept-Credentials        | R     | rm    | o   | o   | o   | -   |
   | Accept-Encoding           | R     | r     | o   | o   | o   | -   |
   | Accept-Language           | R     | r     | o   | o   | o   | -   |
   | Accept-Ranges             | G     | rm    | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Allow                     | 405   | amr   | m   | m   | m   | m   |
   | Authentication-Info       | r     |       | o/- | o/- | -   | -   |
   | Authorization             | R     |       | o   | o   | o   | -   |
   | Bandwidth                 | R     |       | -   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Blocksize                 | R     |       | -   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Cache-Control             | G     | r     | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Connection                | G     |       | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   | Connection-Credentials    | 470,  | ar    | o   | o   | o   | -   |
   |                           | 407   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Base              | R     |       | o   | o   | -   | o   |
   | Content-Base              | r     |       | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Base              | 4xx,  |       | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                           | 5xx   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Encoding          | R     | r     | o   | o   | -   | o   |
   | Content-Encoding          | r     | r     | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Encoding          | 4xx,  | r     | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                           | 5xx   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Language          | R     | r     | o   | o   | -   | o   |
   | Content-Language          | r     | r     | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Language          | 4xx,  | r     | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                           | 5xx   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Length            | R     | r     | *   | *   | -   | *   |
   | Content-Length            | r     | r     | *   | *   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Length            | 4xx,  | r     | *   | *   | *   | *   |
   |                           | 5xx   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Location          | R     |       | o   | o   | -   | o   |
   | Content-Location          | r     |       | o   | o   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Location          | 4xx,  |       | o   | o   | o   | o   |
   |                           | 5xx   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | Content-Type              | R     |       | *   | *   | -   | *   |
   | Content-Type              | r     |       | *   | *   | -   | -   |
   | Content-Type              | 4xx,  |       | *   | *   | *   | *   |
   |                           | 5xx   |       |     |     |     |     |
   | CSeq                      | R,c   | mr    | m   | m   | m   | m   |
   | Date                      | R     | a     | o/* | o/* | m   | o/* |
   | Date                      | r     | am    | o/* | o/* | o/* | o/* |
   | Expires                   | r     | r     | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | From                      | R     | r     | o   | o   | o   | -   |
   | If-Match                  | R     | r     | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | If-Modified-Since         | R     | am    | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | If-None-Match             | R     | am    | o   | -   | -   | -   |



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 131]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   | Last-Modified             | R     | r     | -   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Last-Modified             | r     | r     | o   | -   | -   | -   |
   | Location                  | 3rr   |       | m   | m   | m   | -   |
   | Location                  | R     |       | -   | -   | m   | -   |
   +---------------------------+-------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
   | Header                    | Where | Proxy | GPR | SPR | RDR | PNY |
   +---------------------------+-------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+

     Figure 4: Overview of RTSP Header Fields (A-L) Related to Methods
          GET_PARAMETER, SET_PARAMETER, REDIRECT, and PLAY_NOTIFY









































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 132]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


 +---------------------------+---------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
 | Header                    |  Where  | Proxy | GPR | SPR | RDR | PNY |
 +---------------------------+---------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
 | Media-Properties          | R       | amr   | o   | -   | -   | c   |
 | Media-Properties          | r       | mr    | c   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Media-Range               | R       |       | o   | -   | -   | c   |
 | Media-Range               | r       |       | c   | -   | -   | -   |
 | MTag                      | r       | r     | o   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Notify-Reason             | R       |       | -   | -   | -   | m   |
 | Pipelined-Requests        | R       | amdr  | o   | o   | -   | -   |
 | Proxy-Authenticate        | 407     | amdr  | m   | m   | m   | -   |
 | Proxy-Authentication-Info | r       | amdr  | o/- | o/- | -   | -   |
 | Proxy-Authorization       | R       | amdr  | o   | o   | o   | -   |
 | Proxy-Require             | R       | ar    | o   | o   | o   | -   |
 | Proxy-Supported           | R       | amr   | c   | c   | c   | -   |
 | Proxy-Supported           | r       |       | c   | c   | c   | -   |
 | Public                    | 501     | admr  | m   | m   | m   | -   |
 | Range                     | R       |       | o   | -   | -   | m   |
 | Range                     | r       |       | c   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Referrer                  | R       |       | o   | o   | o   | -   |
 | Request-Status            | R       | mr    | -   | -   | -   | c   |
 | Require                   | R       | r     | o   | o   | o   | o   |
 | Retry-After               | 3rr,503,|       | o   | o   | -   | -   |
 |                           | 553     |       |     |     |     |     |
 | Retry-After               | 413     |       | o   | o   | -   | -   |
 | RTP-Info                  | R       | r     | o   | -   | -   | C   |
 | RTP-Info                  | r       | r     | c   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Scale                     | G       |       | c   | -   | c   | c   |
 | Seek-Style                | G       |       | -   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Server                    | R       | r     | o   | o   | o   | o   |
 | Server                    | r       | r     | o   | o   | -   | -   |
 | Session                   | R       | r     | o   | o   | o   | m   |
 | Session                   | r       | r     | c   | c   | o   | m   |
 | Speed                     | G       |       | -   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Supported                 | R       | r     | o   | o   | o   | -   |
 | Supported                 | r       | r     | c   | c   | c   | -   |
 | Terminate-Reason          | R       | r     | -   | -   | m   | -   |
 | Timestamp                 | R       | adrm  | o   | o   | o   | o   |
 | Timestamp                 | c       | adrm  | m   | m   | m   | m   |
 | Transport                 | G       | mr    | -   | -   | -   | -   |
 | Unsupported               | r       | arm   | c   | c   | c   | c   |
 | User-Agent                | R       | r     | m*  | m*  | -   | -   |
 | User-Agent                | r       | r     | m*  | m*  | m*  | m*  |
 | Via                       | R       | amr   | c   | c   | c   | c   |







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 133]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


 | Via                       | r       | amr   | c   | c   | c   | c   |
 | WWW-Authenticate          | 401     |       | m   | m   | m   | -   |
 +---------------------------+---------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
 | Header                    |  Where  | Proxy | GPR | SPR | RDR | PNY |
 +---------------------------+---------+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+

     Figure 5: Overview of RTSP Header Fields (M-W) Related to Methods
          GET_PARAMETER, SET_PARAMETER, REDIRECT, and PLAY_NOTIFY

18.1.  Accept

   The Accept request-header field can be used to specify certain
   presentation description and parameter media types [RFC6838] that are
   acceptable for the response to the DESCRIBE request.

   See Section 20.2.3 for the syntax.

   The asterisk "*" character is used to group media types into ranges,
   with "*/*" indicating all media types and "type/*" indicating all
   subtypes of that type.  The range MAY include media type parameters
   that are generally applicable to that range.

   Each media type or range MAY be followed by one or more accept-
   params, beginning with the "q" parameter to indicate a relative
   quality factor.  The first "q" parameter (if any) separates the media
   type or range's parameters from the accept-params.  Quality factors
   allow the user or user agent to indicate the relative degree of
   preference for that media type, using the qvalue scale from 0 to 1
   (Section 5.3.1 of [RFC7231]).  The default value is q=1.

   Example of use:

     Accept: application/example ;q=0.7, application/sdp

   Indicates that the requesting agent prefers the media type
   application/sdp through the default 1.0 rating but also accepts the
   application/example media type with a 0.7 quality rating.

   If no Accept header field is present, then it is assumed that the
   client accepts all media types.  If an Accept header field is
   present, and if the server cannot send a response that is acceptable
   according to the combined Accept field-value, then the server SHOULD
   send a 406 (Not Acceptable) response.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 134]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.2.  Accept-Credentials

   The Accept-Credentials header is a request-header used to indicate to
   any trusted intermediary how to handle further secured connections to
   proxies or servers.  It MUST NOT be included in server-to-client
   requests.  See Section 19 for the usage of this header

   In a request, the header MUST contain the method (User, Proxy, or
   Any) for approving credentials selected by the requester.  The method
   MUST NOT be changed by any proxy, unless it is "Proxy" when a proxy
   MAY change it to "user" to take the role of user approving each
   further hop.  If the method is "User", the header contains zero or
   more of the credentials that the client accepts.  The header may
   contain zero credentials in the first RTSP request to an RTSP server
   via a proxy when using the "User" method.  This is because the client
   has not yet received any credentials to accept.  Each credential MUST
   consist of one URI identifying the proxy or server, the hash
   algorithm identifier, and the hash over that agent's ASN.1 DER-
   encoded certificate [RFC5280] in Base64, according to Section 4 of
   [RFC4648] and where the padding bits are set to zero.  All RTSP
   clients and proxies MUST implement the SHA-256 [FIPS180-4] algorithm
   for computation of the hash of the DER-encoded certificate.  The
   SHA-256 algorithm is identified by the token "sha-256".

   The intention of allowing for other hash algorithms is to enable the
   future retirement of algorithms that are not implemented somewhere
   other than here.  Thus, the definition of future algorithms for this
   purpose is intended to be extremely limited.  A feature tag can be
   used to ensure that support for the replacement algorithm exists.

   Example:

   Accept-Credentials:User
     "rtsps://proxy2.example.com/";sha-256;exaIl9VMbQMOFGClx5rXnPJKVNI=,
     "rtsps://server.example.com/";sha-256;lurbjj5khhB0NhIuOXtt4bBRH1M=

18.3.  Accept-Encoding

   The Accept-Encoding request-header field is similar to Accept, but it
   restricts the content-codings (see Section 18.15), i.e.,
   transformation codings of the message body, such as gzip compression,
   that are acceptable in the response.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 135]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   A server tests whether a content-coding is acceptable, according to
   an Accept-Encoding field, using these rules:

   1.  If the content-coding is one of the content-codings listed in the
       Accept-Encoding field, then it is acceptable, unless it is
       accompanied by a qvalue of 0.  (As defined in Section 5.3.1 of
       [RFC7231], a qvalue of 0 means "not acceptable.")

   2.  The special "*" symbol in an Accept-Encoding field matches any
       available content-coding not explicitly listed in the header
       field.

   3.  If multiple content-codings are acceptable, then the acceptable
       content-coding with the highest non-zero qvalue is preferred.

   4.  The "identity" content-coding is always acceptable, i.e., no
       transformation at all, unless specifically refused because the
       Accept-Encoding field includes "identity;q=0" or because the
       field includes "*;q=0" and does not explicitly include the
       "identity" content-coding.  If the Accept-Encoding field-value is
       empty, then only the "identity" encoding is acceptable.

   If an Accept-Encoding field is present in a request, and if the
   server cannot send a response that is acceptable according to the
   Accept-Encoding header, then the server SHOULD send an error response
   with the 406 (Not Acceptable) status code.

   If no Accept-Encoding field is present in a request, the server MAY
   assume that the client will accept any content-coding.  In this case,
   if "identity" is one of the available content-codings, then the
   server SHOULD use the "identity" content-coding, unless it has
   additional information that a different content-coding is meaningful
   to the client.

18.4.  Accept-Language

   The Accept-Language request-header field is similar to Accept, but
   restricts the set of natural languages that are preferred as a
   response to the request.  Note that the language specified applies to
   the presentation description (response message body) and any reason
   phrases, but not the media content.

   A language tag identifies a natural language spoken, written, or
   otherwise conveyed by human beings for communication of information
   to other human beings.  Computer languages are explicitly excluded.
   The syntax and registry of RTSP 2.0 language tags are the same as
   those defined by [RFC5646].




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 136]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Each language-range MAY be given an associated quality value that
   represents an estimate of the user's preference for the languages
   specified by that range.  The quality value defaults to "q=1".  For
   example:

      Accept-Language: da, en-gb;q=0.8, en;q=0.7

   would mean: "I prefer Danish, but will accept British English and
   other types of English."  A language-range matches a language tag if
   it exactly equals the full tag or if it exactly equals a prefix of
   the tag, i.e., the primary-tag in the ABNF, such that the character
   following primary-tag is "-".  The special range "*", if present in
   the Accept-Language field, matches every tag not matched by any other
   range present in the Accept-Language field.

      Note: This use of a prefix matching rule does not imply that
      language tags are assigned to languages in such a way that it is
      always true that if a user understands a language with a certain
      tag, then this user will also understand all languages with tags
      for which this tag is a prefix.  The prefix rule simply allows the
      use of prefix tags if this is the case.

   In the process of selecting a language, each language tag is assigned
   a qualification factor, i.e., if a language being supported by the
   client is actually supported by the server and what "preference"
   level the language achieves.  The quality value (q-value) of the
   longest language-range in the field that matches the language tag is
   assigned as the qualification factor for a particular language tag.
   If no language-range in the field matches the tag, the language
   qualification factor assigned is 0.  If no Accept-Language header is
   present in the request, the server SHOULD assume that all languages
   are equally acceptable.  If an Accept-Language header is present,
   then all languages that are assigned a qualification factor greater
   than 0 are acceptable.

18.5.  Accept-Ranges

   The Accept-Ranges general-header field allows indication of the
   format supported in the Range header.  The client MUST include the
   header in SETUP requests to indicate which formats are acceptable
   when received in PLAY and PAUSE responses and REDIRECT requests.  The
   server MUST include the header in SETUP responses and 456 (Header
   Field Not Valid for Resource) error responses to indicate the formats
   supported for the resource indicated by the Request-URI.  The header
   MAY be included in GET_PARAMETER request and response pairs.  The
   GET_PARAMETER request MUST contain a Session header to identify the





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 137]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   session context the request is related to.  The requester and
   responder will indicate their capabilities regarding Range formats
   respectively.

      Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   The syntax is defined in Section 20.2.3.

18.6.  Allow

   The Allow message body header field lists the methods supported by
   the resource identified by the Request-URI.  The purpose of this
   field is to inform the recipient of the complete set of valid methods
   associated with the resource.  An Allow header field MUST be present
   in a 405 (Method Not Allowed) response.  The Allow header MUST also
   be present in all OPTIONS responses where the content of the header
   will not include exactly the same methods as listed in the Public
   header.

   The Allow message body header MUST also be included in SETUP and
   DESCRIBE responses, if the methods allowed for the resource are
   different from the complete set of methods defined in this memo.

   Example of use:

      Allow: SETUP, PLAY, SET_PARAMETER, DESCRIBE

18.7.  Authentication-Info

   The Authentication-Info response-header is used by the server to
   communicate some information regarding the successful HTTP
   authentication [RFC7235] in the response message.  The definition of
   the header is in [RFC7615], and any applicable HTTP authentication
   schemes appear in other RFCs, such as Digest [RFC7616].  This header
   MUST only be used in response messages related to client to server
   requests.

18.8.  Authorization

   An RTSP client that wishes to authenticate itself with a server using
   the authentication mechanism from HTTP [RFC7235], usually (but not
   necessarily) after receiving a 401 response, does so by including an
   Authorization request-header field with the request.  The
   Authorization field-value consists of credentials containing the
   authentication information of the user agent for the realm of the
   resource being requested.  The definition of the header is in





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 138]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC7235], and any applicable HTTP authentication schemes appear in
   other RFCs, such as Digest [RFC7616] and Basic [RFC7617].  This
   header MUST only be used in client-to-server requests.

   If a request is authenticated and a realm specified, the same
   credentials SHOULD be valid for all other requests within this realm
   (assuming that the authentication scheme itself does not require
   otherwise, such as credentials that vary according to a challenge
   value or using synchronized clocks).  Each client-to-server request
   MUST be individually authorized by including the Authorization header
   with the information.

   When a shared cache (see Section 16) receives a request containing an
   Authorization field, it MUST NOT return the corresponding response as
   a reply to any other request, unless one of the following specific
   exceptions holds:

   1.  If the response includes the "max-age" cache directive, the cache
       MAY use that response in replying to a subsequent request.  But
       (if the specified maximum age has passed) a proxy cache MUST
       first revalidate it with the origin server, using the request-
       headers from the new request to allow the origin server to
       authenticate the new request.  (This is the defined behavior for
       max-age.)  If the response includes "max-age=0", the proxy MUST
       always revalidate it before reusing it.

   2.  If the response includes the "must-revalidate" cache-control
       directive, the cache MAY use that response in replying to a
       subsequent request.  But if the response is stale, all caches
       MUST first revalidate it with the origin server, using the
       request-headers from the new request to allow the origin server
       to authenticate the new request.

   3.  If the response includes the "public" cache directive, it MAY be
       returned in reply to any subsequent request.

18.9.  Bandwidth

   The Bandwidth request-header field describes the estimated bandwidth
   available to the client, expressed as a positive integer and measured
   in kilobits per second.  The bandwidth available to the client may
   change during an RTSP session, e.g., due to mobility, congestion,
   etc.

   Clients may not be able to accurately determine the available
   bandwidth, for example, because the first hop is not a bottleneck.
   Such a case is when the local area network (LAN) is not the
   bottleneck, instead the LAN's Internet access link is, if the server



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 139]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   is not in the same LAN.  Thus, link speeds of WLAN or Ethernet
   networks are normally not a basis for estimating the available
   bandwidth.  Cellular devices or other devices directly connected to a
   modem or connection-enabling device may more accurately estimate the
   bottleneck bandwidth and what is a reasonable share of it for RTSP-
   controlled media.  The client will also need to take into account
   other traffic sharing the bottleneck.  For example, by only assigning
   a certain fraction to RTSP and its media streams.  It is RECOMMENDED
   that only clients that have accurate and explicit information about
   bandwidth bottlenecks use this header.

   This header is not a substitute for proper congestion control.  It is
   only a method providing an initial estimate and coarsely determines
   if the selected content can be delivered at all.

   Example:

     Bandwidth: 62360

18.10.  Blocksize

   The Blocksize request-header field is sent from the client to the
   media server asking the server for a particular media packet size.
   This packet size does not include lower-layer headers such as IP,
   UDP, or RTP.  The server is free to use a blocksize that is lower
   than the one requested.  The server MAY truncate this packet size to
   the closest multiple of the minimum, media-specific block size or
   override it with the media-specific size, if necessary.  The block
   size MUST be a positive decimal number measured in octets.  The
   server only returns an error (4xx) if the value is syntactically
   invalid.

18.11.  Cache-Control

   The Cache-Control general-header field is used to specify directives
   that MUST be obeyed by all caching mechanisms along the request/
   response chain.

   Cache directives MUST be passed through by a proxy or gateway
   application, regardless of their significance to that application,
   since the directives may be applicable to all recipients along the
   request/response chain.  It is not possible to specify a cache-
   directive for a specific cache.

   Cache-Control should only be specified in a DESCRIBE, GET_PARAMETER,
   SET_PARAMETER, and SETUP request and its response.  Note: Cache-
   Control does not govern only the caching of responses for the RTSP
   messages, instead it also applies to the media stream identified by



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 140]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   the SETUP request.  The RTSP requests are generally not cacheable;
   for further information, see Section 16.  Below are the descriptions
   of the cache directives that can be included in the Cache-Control
   header.

   no-cache:  Indicates that the media stream or RTSP response MUST NOT
         be cached anywhere.  This allows an origin server to prevent
         caching even by caches that have been configured to return
         stale responses to client requests.  Note: there is no security
         function preventing the caching of content.

   public:  Indicates that the media stream or RTSP response is
         cacheable by any cache.

   private:  Indicates that the media stream or RTSP response is
         intended for a single user and MUST NOT be cached by a shared
         cache.  A private (non-shared) cache may cache the media
         streams.

   no-transform:  An intermediate cache (proxy) may find it useful to
         convert the media type of a certain stream.  A proxy might, for
         example, convert between video formats to save cache space or
         to reduce the amount of traffic on a slow link.  Serious
         operational problems may occur, however, when these
         transformations have been applied to streams intended for
         certain kinds of applications.  For example, applications for
         medical imaging, scientific data analysis and those using end-
         to-end authentication all depend on receiving a stream that is
         bit-for-bit identical to the original media stream or RTSP
         response.  Therefore, if a response includes the no-transform
         directive, an intermediate cache or proxy MUST NOT change the
         encoding of the stream or response.  Unlike HTTP, RTSP does not
         provide for partial transformation at this point, e.g.,
         allowing translation into a different language.

   only-if-cached:  In some cases, such as times of extremely poor
         network connectivity, a client may want a cache to return only
         those media streams or RTSP responses that it currently has
         stored and not to receive these from the origin server.  To do
         this, the client may include the only-if-cached directive in a
         request.  If the cache receives this directive, it SHOULD
         either respond using a cached media stream or response that is
         consistent with the other constraints of the request or respond
         with a 504 (Gateway Timeout) status.  However, if a group of
         caches is being operated as a unified system with good internal
         connectivity, such a request MAY be forwarded within that group
         of caches.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 141]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   max-stale:  Indicates that the client is willing to accept a media
         stream or RTSP response that has exceeded its expiration time.
         If max-stale is assigned a value, then the client is willing to
         accept a response that has exceeded its expiration time by no
         more than the specified number of seconds.  If no value is
         assigned to max-stale, then the client is willing to accept a
         stale response of any age.

   min-fresh:  Indicates that the client is willing to accept a media
         stream or RTSP response whose freshness lifetime is no less
         than its current age plus the specified time in seconds.  That
         is, the client wants a response that will still be fresh for at
         least the specified number of seconds.

   must-revalidate:  When the must-revalidate directive is present in a
         SETUP response received by a cache, that cache MUST NOT use the
         cache entry after it becomes stale to respond to a subsequent
         request without first revalidating it with the origin server.
         That is, the cache is required to do an end-to-end revalidation
         every time, if, based solely on the origin server's Expires,
         the cached response is stale.

   proxy-revalidate:  The proxy-revalidate directive has the same
         meaning as the must-revalidate directive, except that it does
         not apply to non-shared user agent caches.  It can be used on a
         response to an authenticated request to permit the user's cache
         to store and later return the response without needing to
         revalidate it (since it has already been authenticated once by
         that user), while still requiring proxies that service many
         users to revalidate each time (in order to make sure that each
         user has been authenticated).  Note that such authenticated
         responses also need the "public" cache directive in order to
         allow them to be cached at all.

   max-age:  When an intermediate cache is forced, by means of a max-
         age=0 directive, to revalidate its own cache entry, and the
         client has supplied its own validator in the request, the
         supplied validator might differ from the validator currently
         stored with the cache entry.  In this case, the cache MAY use
         either validator in making its own request without affecting
         semantic transparency.

         However, the choice of validator might affect performance.  The
         best approach is for the intermediate cache to use its own
         validator when making its request.  If the server replies with
         304 (Not Modified), then the cache can return its now validated
         copy to the client with a 200 (OK) response.  If the server
         replies with a new message body and cache validator, however,



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 142]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


         the intermediate cache can compare the returned validator with
         the one provided in the client's request, using the strong
         comparison function.  If the client's validator is equal to the
         origin server's, then the intermediate cache simply returns 304
         (Not Modified).  Otherwise, it returns the new message body
         with a 200 (OK) response.

18.12.  Connection

   The Connection general-header field allows the sender to specify
   options that are desired for that particular connection.  It MUST NOT
   be communicated by proxies over further connections.

   RTSP 2.0 proxies MUST parse the Connection header field before a
   message is forwarded and, for each connection-token in this field,
   remove any header field(s) from the message with the same name as the
   connection-token.  Connection options are signaled by the presence of
   a connection-token in the Connection header field, not by any
   corresponding additional header field(s), since the additional header
   field may not be sent if there are no parameters associated with that
   connection option.

   Message headers listed in the Connection header MUST NOT include end-
   to-end headers, such as Cache-Control.

   RTSP 2.0 defines the "close" connection option for the sender to
   signal that the connection will be closed after completion of the
   response.  For example, "Connection: close in either the request or
   the response-header fields" indicates that the connection SHOULD NOT
   be considered "persistent" (Section 10.2) after the current request/
   response is complete.

   The use of the connection option "close" in RTSP messages SHOULD be
   limited to error messages when the server is unable to recover and
   therefore sees it necessary to close the connection.  The reason
   being that the client has the choice of continuing using a connection
   indefinitely, as long as it sends valid messages.

18.13.  Connection-Credentials

   The Connection-Credentials response-header is used to carry the chain
   of credentials for any next hop that needs to be approved by the
   requester.  It MUST only be used in server-to-client responses.

   The Connection-Credentials header in an RTSP response MUST, if
   included, contain the credential information (in the form of a list
   of certificates providing the chain of certification) of the next hop
   to which an intermediary needs to securely connect.  The header MUST



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 143]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   include the URI of the next hop (proxy or server) and a
   Base64-encoded (according to Section 4 of [RFC4648] and where the
   padding bits are set to zero) binary structure containing a sequence
   of DER-encoded X.509v3 certificates [RFC5280].

   The binary structure starts with the number of certificates
   (NR_CERTS) included as a 16-bit unsigned integer.  This is followed
   by an NR_CERTS number of 16-bit unsigned integers providing the size,
   in octets, of each DER-encoded certificate.  This is followed by an
   NR_CERTS number of DER-encoded X.509v3 certificates in a sequence
   (chain).  This format is exemplified in Figure 6.  The certificate of
   the proxy or server must come first in the structure.  Each following
   certificate must directly certify the one preceding it.  Because
   certificate validation requires that root keys be distributed
   independently, the self-signed certificate that specifies the root
   certificate authority may optionally be omitted from the chain, under
   the assumption that the remote end must already possess it in order
   to validate it in any case.

   Example:

   Connection-Credentials:"rtsps://proxy2.example.com/";MIIDNTCC...

   Where MIIDNTCC... is a Base64 encoding of the following structure:

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Number of certificates       | Size of certificate #1        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | Size of certificate #2        | Size of certificate #3        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       : DER Encoding of Certificate #1                                :
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       : DER Encoding of Certificate #2                                :
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       : DER Encoding of Certificate #3                                :
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Figure 6: Format Example of Connection-Credentials Header Certificate

18.14.  Content-Base

   The Content-Base message body header field may be used to specify the
   base URI for resolving relative URIs within the message body.

   Content-Base: rtsp://media.example.com/movie/twister/




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 144]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   If no Content-Base field is present, the base URI of a message body
   is defined by either its Content-Location (if that Content-Location
   URI is an absolute URI) or the URI used to initiate the request, in
   that order of precedence.  Note, however, that the base URI of the
   contents within the message body may be redefined within that message
   body.

18.15.  Content-Encoding

   The Content-Encoding message body header field is used as a modifier
   of the media-type.  When present, its value indicates what additional
   content-codings have been applied to the message body, and thus what
   decoding mechanisms must be applied in order to obtain the media-type
   referenced by the Content-Type header field.  Content-Encoding is
   primarily used to allow a document to be compressed without losing
   the identity of its underlying media type.

   The content-coding is a characteristic of the message body identified
   by the Request-URI.  Typically, the message body is stored with this
   encoding and is only decoded before rendering or analogous usage.
   However, an RTSP proxy MAY modify the content-coding if the new
   coding is known to be acceptable to the recipient, unless the "no-
   transform" cache directive is present in the message.

   If the content-coding of a message body is not "identity", then the
   message MUST include a Content-Encoding message body header that
   lists the non-identity content-coding(s) used.

   If the content-coding of a message body in a request message is not
   acceptable to the origin server, the server SHOULD respond with a
   status code of 415 (Unsupported Media Type).

   If multiple encodings have been applied to a message body, the
   content-codings MUST be listed in the order in which they were
   applied, first to last from left to right.  Additional information
   about the encoding parameters MAY be provided by other header fields
   not defined by this specification.

18.16.  Content-Language

   The Content-Language message body header field describes the natural
   language(s) of the intended audience for the enclosed message body.
   Note that this might not be equivalent to all the languages used
   within the message body.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 145]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Language tags are mentioned in Section 18.4.  The primary purpose of
   Content-Language is to allow a user to identify and differentiate
   entities according to the user's own preferred language.  Thus, if
   the body content is intended only for a Danish-literate audience, the
   appropriate field is

      Content-Language: da

   If no Content-Language is specified, the default is that the content
   is intended for all language audiences.  This might mean that the
   sender does not consider it to be specific to any natural language or
   that the sender does not know for which language it is intended.

   Multiple languages MAY be listed for content that is intended for
   multiple audiences.  For example, a rendition of the "Treaty of
   Waitangi", presented simultaneously in the original Maori and English
   versions, would call for

      Content-Language: mi, en

   However, just because multiple languages are present within a message
   body does not mean that it is intended for multiple linguistic
   audiences.  An example would be a beginner's language primer, such as
   "A First Lesson in Latin", which is clearly intended to be used by an
   English-literate audience.  In this case, the Content-Language would
   properly only include "en".

   Content-Language MAY be applied to any media type -- it is not
   limited to textual documents.

18.17.  Content-Length

   The Content-Length message body header field contains the length of
   the message body of the RTSP message (i.e., after the double CRLF
   following the last header) in octets of bits.  Unlike HTTP, it MUST
   be included in all messages that carry a message body beyond the
   header portion of the RTSP message.  If it is missing, a default
   value of zero is assumed.  Any Content-Length greater than or equal
   to zero is a valid value.

18.18.  Content-Location

   The Content-Location message body header field MAY be used to supply
   the resource location for the message body enclosed in the message
   when that body is accessible from a location separate from the
   requested resource's URI.  A server SHOULD provide a Content-Location
   for the variant corresponding to the response message body;
   especially in the case where a resource has multiple variants



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 146]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   associated with it, and those entities actually have separate
   locations by which they might be individually accessed, the server
   SHOULD provide a Content-Location for the particular variant that is
   returned.

   As an example, if an RTSP client performs a DESCRIBE request on a
   given resource, e.g., "rtsp://a.example.com/movie/
   Plan9FromOuterSpace", then the server may use additional information,
   such as the User-Agent header, to determine the capabilities of the
   agent.  The server will then return a media description tailored to
   that class of RTSP agents.  To indicate which specific description
   the agent receives, the resource identifier
   ("rtsp://a.example.com/movie/Plan9FromOuterSpace/FullHD.sdp") is
   provided in Content-Location, while the description is still a valid
   response for the generic resource identifier, thus enabling both
   debugging and cache operation as discussed below.

   The Content-Location value is not a replacement for the original
   requested URI; it is only a statement of the location of the resource
   corresponding to this particular variant at the time of the request.
   Future requests MAY specify the Content-Location URI as the Request-
   URI if the desire is to identify the source of that particular
   variant.  This is useful if the RTSP agent desires to verify if the
   resource variant is current through a conditional request.

   A cache cannot assume that a message body with a Content-Location
   different from the URI used to retrieve it can be used to respond to
   later requests on that Content-Location URI.  However, the Content-
   Location can be used to differentiate between multiple variants
   retrieved from a single requested resource.

   If the Content-Location is a relative URI, the relative URI is
   interpreted relative to the Request-URI.

   Note that Content-Location can be used in some cases to derive the
   base-URI for relative URI(s) present in session description formats.
   This needs to be taken into account when Content-Location is used.
   The easiest way to avoid needing to consider that issue is to include
   the Content-Base whenever the Content-Location is included.

   Note also, when using Media Tags in conjunction with Content-
   Location, it is important that the different versions have different
   MTags, even if provided under different Content-Location URIs.  This
   is because the different content variants still have been provided in
   response to the same request URI.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 147]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Note also, as in most cases, the URIs used in the DESCRIBE and the
   SETUP requests are different: the URI provided in a DESCRIBE Content-
   Location response can't directly be used in a SETUP request.
   Instead, the steps of deriving the media resource URIs are necessary.
   This commonly involves combing the media description's relative URIs,
   e.g., from the SDP's a=control attribute, with the base-URI to create
   the absolute URIs needed in the SETUP request.

18.19.  Content-Type

   The Content-Type message body header indicates the media type of the
   message body sent to the recipient.  Note that the content types
   suitable for RTSP are likely to be restricted in practice to
   presentation descriptions and parameter-value types.

18.20.  CSeq

   The CSeq general-header field specifies the sequence number (integer)
   for an RTSP request/response pair.  This field MUST be present in all
   requests and responses.  RTSP agents maintain a sequence number
   series for each responder to which they have an open message
   transport channel.  For each new RTSP request an agent originates on
   a particular RTSP message transport, the CSeq value MUST be
   incremented by one.  The initial sequence number can be any number;
   however, it is RECOMMENDED to start at 0.  Each sequence number
   series is unique between each requester and responder, i.e., the
   client has one series for its requests to a server and the server has
   another when sending requests to the client.  Each requester and
   responder is identified by its socket address (IP address and port
   number), i.e., per direction of a TCP connection.  Any retransmitted
   request MUST contain the same sequence number as the original, i.e.,
   the sequence number is not incremented for retransmissions of the
   same request.  The RTSP agent receiving requests MUST process the
   requests arriving on a particular transport in the order of the
   sequence numbers.  Responses are sent in the order that they are
   generated.  The RTSP response MUST have the same sequence number as
   was present in the corresponding request.  An RTSP agent receiving a
   response MAY receive the responses out of order compared to the order
   of the requests it sent.  Thus, the agent MUST use the sequence
   number in the response to pair it with the corresponding request.

      The main purpose of the sequence number is to map responses to
      requests.

      The requirement to use a sequence-number increment of one for each
      new request is to support any future specification of RTSP message
      transport over a protocol that does not provide in-order delivery
      or is unreliable.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 148]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      The above rules relating to the initial sequence number may appear
      unnecessarily loose.  The reason for this is to cater to some
      common behavior of existing implementations: when using multiple
      reliable connections in sequence, it may still be easiest to use a
      single sequence-number series for a client connecting with a
      particular server.  Thus, the initial sequence number may be
      arbitrary depending on the number of previous requests.  For any
      unreliable transport, a stricter definition or other solution will
      be required to enable detection of any loss of the first request.

      When using multiple sequential transport connections, there is no
      protocol mechanism to ensure in-order processing as the sequence
      number is scoped on the individual transport connection and its
      five tuple.  Thus, there are potential issues with opening a new
      transport connection to the same host for which there already
      exists a transport connection with outstanding requests and
      previously dispatched requests related to the same RTSP session.

   RTSP Proxies also need to follow the above rules.  This implies that
   proxies that aggregate requests from multiple clients onto a single
   transport towards a server or a next-hop proxy need to renumber these
   requests to form a unified sequence on that transport, fulfilling the
   above rules.  A proxy capable of fulfilling some agent's request
   without emitting its own request (e.g., a caching proxy that fulfills
   a request from its cache) also causes a need to renumber as the
   number of received requests with a particular target may not be the
   same as the number of emitted requests towards that target agent.  A
   proxy that needs to renumber needs to perform the corresponding
   renumbering back to the original sequence number for any received
   response before forwarding it back to the originator of the request.

      A client connected to a proxy, and using that transport to send
      requests to multiple servers, creates a situation where it is
      quite likely to receive the responses out of order.  This is
      because the proxy will establish separate transports from the
      proxy to the servers on which to forward the client's requests.
      When the responses arrive from the different servers, they will be
      forwarded to the client in the order they arrive at the proxy and
      can be processed, not the order of the client's original sequence
      numbers.  This is intentional to avoid some session's requests
      being blocked by another server's slow processing of requests.










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 149]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.21.  Date

   The Date general-header field represents the date and time at which
   the message was originated.  The inclusion of the Date header in an
   RTSP message follows these rules:

   o  An RTSP message, sent by either the client or the server,
      containing a body MUST include a Date header, if the sending host
      has a clock;

   o  Clients and servers are RECOMMENDED to include a Date header in
      all other RTSP messages, if the sending host has a clock;

   o  If the server does not have a clock that can provide a reasonable
      approximation of the current time, its responses MUST NOT include
      a Date header field.  In this case, this rule MUST be followed:
      some origin-server implementations might not have a clock
      available.  An origin server without a clock MUST NOT assign
      Expires or Last-Modified values to a response, unless these values
      were associated with the resource by a system or user with a
      reliable clock.  It MAY assign an Expires value that is known, at
      or before server-configuration time, to be in the past (this
      allows "pre-expiration" of responses without storing separate
      Expires values for each resource).

   A received message that does not have a Date header field MUST be
   assigned one by the recipient if the message will be cached by that
   recipient.  An RTSP implementation without a clock MUST NOT cache
   responses without revalidating them on every use.  An RTSP cache,
   especially a shared cache, SHOULD use a mechanism, such as the
   Network Time Protocol (NTP) [RFC5905], to synchronize its clock with
   a reliable external standard.

   The RTSP-date, a full date as specified by Section 3.3 of [RFC5322],
   sent in a Date header SHOULD NOT represent a date and time subsequent
   to the generation of the message.  It SHOULD represent the best
   available approximation of the date and time of message generation,
   unless the implementation has no means of generating a reasonably
   accurate date and time.  In theory, the date ought to represent the
   moment just before the message body is generated.  In practice, the
   date can be generated at any time during the message origination
   without affecting its semantic value.

      Note: The RTSP 2.0 date format is defined to be the full-date
      format in RFC 5322.  This format is more flexible than the date
      format in RFC 1123 used by RTSP 1.0.  Thus, implementations should
      use single spaces as separators, as recommended by RFC 5322, and
      support receiving the obsolete format.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 150]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      Further, note that the syntax allows for a comment to be added at
      the end of the date.

18.22.  Expires

   The Expires message body header field gives a date and time after
   which the description or media-stream should be considered stale.
   The interpretation depends on the method:

   DESCRIBE response:  The Expires header indicates a date and time
         after which the presentation description (body) SHOULD be
         considered stale.

   SETUP response:  The Expires header indicates a date and time after
         which the media stream SHOULD be considered stale.

   A stale cache entry should not be returned by a cache (either a proxy
   cache or a user agent cache) unless it is first validated with the
   origin server (or with an intermediate cache that has a fresh copy of
   the message body).  See Section 16 for further discussion of the
   expiration model.

   The presence of an Expires field does not imply that the original
   resource will change or cease to exist at, before, or after that
   time.

   The format is an absolute date and time as defined by RTSP-date.  An
   example of its use is

     Expires: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000

   RTSP 2.0 clients and caches MUST treat other invalid date formats,
   especially those including the value "0", as having occurred in the
   past (i.e., already expired).

   To mark a response as "already expired," an origin server should use
   an Expires date that is equal to the Date header value.  To mark a
   response as "never expires", an origin server SHOULD use an Expires
   date approximately one year from the time the response is sent.  RTSP
   2.0 servers SHOULD NOT send Expires dates that are more than one year
   in the future.

18.23.  From

   The From request-header field, if given, SHOULD contain an Internet
   email address for the human user who controls the requesting user
   agent.  The address SHOULD be machine usable, as defined by "mailbox"
   in [RFC1123].



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 151]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This header field MAY be used for logging purposes and as a means for
   identifying the source of invalid or unwanted requests.  It SHOULD
   NOT be used as an insecure form of access protection.  The
   interpretation of this field is that the request is being performed
   on behalf of the person given, who accepts responsibility for the
   method performed.  In particular, robot agents SHOULD include this
   header so that the person responsible for running the robot can be
   contacted if problems occur on the receiving end.

   The Internet email address in this field MAY be separate from the
   Internet host that issued the request.  For example, when a request
   is passed through a proxy, the original issuer's address SHOULD be
   used.

   The client SHOULD NOT send the From header field without the user's
   approval, as it might conflict with the user's privacy interests or
   their site's security policy.  It is strongly recommended that the
   user be able to disable, enable, and modify the value of this field
   at any time prior to a request.

18.24.  If-Match

   The If-Match request-header field is especially useful for ensuring
   the integrity of the presentation description, independent of how the
   presentation description was received.  The presentation description
   can be fetched via means external to RTSP (such as HTTP) or via the
   DESCRIBE message.  In the case of retrieving the presentation
   description via RTSP, the server implementation is guaranteeing the
   integrity of the description between the time of the DESCRIBE message
   and the SETUP message.  By including the MTag given in or with the
   session description in an If-Match header part of the SETUP request,
   the client ensures that resources set up are matching the
   description.  A SETUP request with the If-Match header for which the
   MTag validation check fails MUST generate a response using 412
   (Precondition Failed).

   This validation check is also very useful if a session has been
   redirected from one server to another.

18.25.  If-Modified-Since

   The If-Modified-Since request-header field is used with the DESCRIBE
   and SETUP methods to make them conditional.  If the requested variant
   has not been modified since the time specified in this field, a
   description will not be returned from the server (DESCRIBE) or a
   stream will not be set up (SETUP).  Instead, a 304 (Not Modified)
   response MUST be returned without any message body.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 152]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   An example of the field is:

     If-Modified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT

18.26.  If-None-Match

   This request-header can be used with one or several message body tags
   to make DESCRIBE requests conditional.  A client that has one or more
   message bodies previously obtained from the resource can verify that
   none of those entities is current by including a list of their
   associated message body tags in the If-None-Match header field.  The
   purpose of this feature is to allow efficient updates of cached
   information with a minimum amount of transaction overhead.  As a
   special case, the value "*" matches any current entity of the
   resource.

   If any of the message body tags match the message body tag of the
   message body that would have been returned in the response to a
   similar DESCRIBE request (without the If-None-Match header) on that
   resource, or if "*" is given and any current entity exists for that
   resource, then the server MUST NOT perform the requested method,
   unless required to do so because the resource's modification date
   fails to match that supplied in an If-Modified-Since header field in
   the request.  Instead, if the request method was DESCRIBE, the server
   SHOULD respond with a 304 (Not Modified) response, including the
   cache-related header fields (particularly MTag) of one of the message
   bodies that matched.  For all other request methods, the server MUST
   respond with a status of 412 (Precondition Failed).

   See Section 16.1.3 for rules on how to determine if two message body
   tags match.

   If none of the message body tags match, then the server MAY perform
   the requested method as if the If-None-Match header field did not
   exist, but MUST also ignore any If-Modified-Since header field(s) in
   the request.  That is, if no message body tags match, then the server
   MUST NOT return a 304 (Not Modified) response.

   If the request would, without the If-None-Match header field, result
   in anything other than a 2xx or 304 status, then the If-None-Match
   header MUST be ignored.  (See Section 16.1.4 for a discussion of
   server behavior when both If-Modified-Since and If-None-Match appear
   in the same request.)

   The result of a request having both an If-None-Match header field and
   an If-Match header field is unspecified and MUST be considered an
   illegal request.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 153]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.27.  Last-Modified

   The Last-Modified message body header field indicates the date and
   time at which the origin server believes the presentation description
   or media stream was last modified.  For the DESCRIBE method, the
   header field indicates the last modification date and time of the
   description, for the SETUP of the media stream.

   An origin server MUST NOT send a Last-Modified date that is later
   than the server's time of message origination.  In such cases, where
   the resource's last modification would indicate some time in the
   future, the server MUST replace that date with the message
   origination date.

   An origin server SHOULD obtain the Last-Modified value of the message
   body as close as possible to the time that it generates the Date
   value of its response.  This allows a recipient to make an accurate
   assessment of the message body's modification time, especially if the
   message body changes near the time that the response is generated.

   RTSP servers SHOULD send Last-Modified whenever feasible.

18.28.  Location

   The Location response-header field is used to redirect the recipient
   to a location other than the Request-URI for completion of the
   request or identification of a new resource.  For 3rr responses, the
   location SHOULD indicate the server's preferred URI for automatic
   redirection to the resource.  The field-value consists of a single
   absolute URI.

   Note: The Content-Location header field (Section 18.18) differs from
   Location in that the Content-Location identifies the original
   location of the message body enclosed in the request.  Therefore, it
   is possible for a response to contain header fields for both Location
   and Content-Location.  Also, see Section 16.2 for cache requirements
   of some methods.

18.29.  Media-Properties

   This general-header is used in SETUP responses or PLAY_NOTIFY
   requests to indicate the media's properties that currently are
   applicable to the RTSP session.  PLAY_NOTIFY MAY be used to modify
   these properties at any point.  However, the client SHOULD have
   received the update prior to any action related to the new media
   properties taking effect.  For aggregated sessions, the Media-
   Properties header will be returned in each SETUP response.  The
   header received in the latest response is the one that applies on the



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 154]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   whole session from this point until any future update.  The header
   MAY be included without value in GET_PARAMETER requests to the server
   with a Session header included to query the current Media-Properties
   for the session.  The responder MUST include the current session's
   media properties.

   The media properties expressed by this header are the ones applicable
   to all media in the RTSP session.  For aggregated sessions, the
   header expressed the combined media-properties.  As a result,
   aggregation of media MAY result in a change of the media properties
   and, thus, the content of the Media-Properties header contained in
   subsequent SETUP responses.

   The header contains a list of property values that are applicable to
   the currently setup media or aggregate of media as indicated by the
   RTSP URI in the request.  No ordering is enforced within the header.
   Property values should be placed into a single group that handles a
   particular orthogonal property.  Values or groups that express
   multiple properties SHOULD NOT be used.  The list of properties that
   can be expressed MAY be extended at any time.  Unknown property
   values MUST be ignored.

   This specification defines the following four groups and their
   property values:

   Random Access:

      Random-Access:  Indicates that random access is possible.  May
         optionally include a floating-point value in seconds indicating
         the longest duration between any two random access points in
         the media.

      Beginning-Only:  Seeking is limited to the beginning only.

      No-Seeking:  No seeking is possible.

   Content Modifications:

      Immutable:  The content will not be changed during the lifetime of
         the RTSP session.

      Dynamic:  The content may be changed based on external methods or
         triggers.

      Time-Progressing:  The media accessible progresses as wallclock
         time progresses.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 155]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Retention:

      Unlimited:  Content will be retained for the duration of the
         lifetime of the RTSP session.

      Time-Limited:  Content will be retained at least until the
         specified wallclock time.  The time must be provided in the
         absolute time format specified in Section 4.4.3.

      Time-Duration:  Each individual media unit is retained for at
         least the specified Time-Duration.  This definition allows for
         retaining data with a time-based sliding window.  The time
         duration is expressed as floating-point number in seconds.  The
         value 0.0 is a valid as this indicates that no data is retained
         in a time-progressing session.

   Supported Scale:

      Scales:  A quoted comma-separated list of one or more decimal
         values or ranges of scale values supported by the content in
         arbitrary order.  A range has a start and stop value separated
         by a colon.  A range indicates that the content supports a
         fine-grained selection of scale values.  Fine-graining allows
         for steps at least as small as one tenth of a scale value.
         Content is considered to support fine-grained selection when
         the server in response to a given scale value can produce
         content with an actual scale that is less than one tenth of
         scale unit, i.e., 0.1, from the requested value.  Negative
         values are supported.  The value 0 has no meaning and MUST NOT
         be used.

   Examples of this header for on-demand content and a live stream
   without recording are:

   On-demand:
   Media-Properties: Random-Access=2.5, Unlimited, Immutable,
        Scales="-20, -10, -4, 0.5:1.5, 4, 8, 10, 15, 20"

   Live stream without recording/timeshifting:
   Media-Properties: No-Seeking, Time-Progressing, Time-Duration=0.0

18.30.  Media-Range

   The Media-Range general-header is used to give the range of the media
   at the time of sending the RTSP message.  This header MUST be
   included in the SETUP response, PLAY and PAUSE responses for media
   that are time-progressing, PLAY and PAUSE responses after any change
   for media that are Dynamic, and in PLAY_NOTIFY requests that are sent



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 156]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   due to Media-Property-Update.  A Media-Range header without any range
   specifications MAY be included in GET_PARAMETER requests to the
   server to request the current range.  In this case, the server MUST
   include the current range at the time of sending the response.

   The header MUST include range specifications for all time formats
   supported for the media, as indicated in Accept-Ranges header
   (Section 18.5) when setting up the media.  The server MAY include
   more than one range specification of any given time format to
   indicate media that has non-continuous range.  The range
   specifications SHALL be ordered with the range with the lowest value
   or earliest start time first, followed by ranges with increasingly
   higher values or later start time.

   For media that has the time-progressing property, the Media-Range
   header values will only be valid for the particular point in time
   when it was issued.  As the wallclock progresses, so will the media
   range.  However, it shall be assumed that media time progresses in
   direct relationship to wallclock time (with the exception of clock
   skew) so that a reasonably accurate estimation of the media range can
   be calculated.

18.31.  MTag

   The MTag response-header MAY be included in DESCRIBE, GET_PARAMETER,
   or SETUP responses.  The message body tags (Section 4.6) returned in
   a DESCRIBE response and the one in SETUP refer to the presentation,
   i.e., both the returned session description and the media stream.
   This allows for verification that one has the right session
   description to a media resource at the time of the SETUP request.
   However, it has the disadvantage that a change in any of the parts
   results in invalidation of all the parts.

   If the MTag is provided both inside the message body, e.g., within
   the "a=mtag" attribute in SDP, and in the response message, then both
   tags MUST be identical.  It is RECOMMENDED that the MTag be primarily
   given in the RTSP response message, to ensure that caches can use the
   MTag without requiring content inspection.  However, for session
   descriptions that are distributed outside of RTSP, for example, using
   HTTP, etc., it will be necessary to include the message body tag in
   the session description as specified in Appendix D.1.9.

   SETUP and DESCRIBE requests can be made conditional upon the MTag
   using the headers If-Match (Section 18.24) and If-None-Match
   (Section 18.26).






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 157]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.32.  Notify-Reason

   The Notify-Reason response-header is solely used in the PLAY_NOTIFY
   method.  It indicates the reason why the server has sent the
   asynchronous PLAY_NOTIFY request (see Section 13.5).

18.33.  Pipelined-Requests

   The Pipelined-Requests general-header is used to indicate that a
   request is to be executed in the context created by a previous
   request(s).  The primary usage of this header is to allow pipelining
   of SETUP requests so that any additional SETUP request after the
   first one does not need to wait for the session ID to be sent back to
   the requesting agent.  The header contains a unique identifier that
   is scoped by the persistent connection used to send the requests.

   Upon receiving a request with the Pipelined-Requests, the responding
   agent MUST look up if there exists a binding between this Pipelined-
   Requests identifier for the current persistent connection and an RTSP
   session ID.  If the binding exists, then the received request is
   processed the same way as if it contained the Session header with the
   found session ID.  If there does not exist a mapping and no Session
   header is included in the request, the responding agent MUST create a
   binding upon the successful completion of a session creating request,
   i.e., SETUP.  A binding MUST NOT be created, if the request failed to
   create an RTSP session.  In case the request contains both a Session
   header and the Pipelined-Requests header, the Pipelined-Requests
   header MUST be ignored.

   Note: Based on the above definition, at least the first request
   containing a new unique Pipelined-Requests header will be required to
   be a SETUP request (unless the protocol is extended with new methods
   of creating a session).  After that first one, additional SETUP
   requests or requests of any type using the RTSP session context may
   include the Pipelined-Requests header.

   When responding to any request that contained the Pipelined-Requests
   header, the server MUST also include the Session header when a
   binding to a session context exists.  An RTSP agent that knows the
   session identifier SHOULD NOT use the Pipelined-Requests header in
   any request and only use the Session header.  This as the Session
   identifier is persistent across transport contexts, like TCP
   connections, which the Pipelined-Requests identifier is not.

   The RTSP agent sending the request with a Pipelined-Requests header
   has the responsibility for using a unique and previously unused
   identifier within the transport context.  Currently, only a TCP
   connection is defined as such a transport context.  A server MUST



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 158]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   delete the Pipelined-Requests identifier and its binding to a session
   upon the termination of that session.  Despite the previous mandate,
   RTSP agents are RECOMMENDED not to reuse identifiers to allow for
   better error handling and logging.

   RTSP Proxies may need to translate Pipelined-Requests identifier
   values from incoming requests to outgoing to allow for aggregation of
   requests onto a persistent connection.

18.34.  Proxy-Authenticate

   The Proxy-Authenticate response-header field MUST be included as part
   of a 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) response.  The field-value
   consists of a challenge that indicates the authentication scheme and
   parameters applicable to the proxy for this Request-URI.  The
   definition of the header is in [RFC7235], and any applicable HTTP
   authentication schemes appear in other RFCs, such as Digest [RFC7616]
   and Basic [RFC7617].

   The HTTP access authentication process is described in [RFC7235].
   This header MUST only be used in response messages related to client-
   to-server requests.

18.35.  Proxy-Authentication-Info

   The Proxy-Authentication-Info response-header is used by the proxy to
   communicate some information regarding the successful authentication
   to the proxy in the message response in some authentication schemes,
   such as the Digest scheme [RFC7616].  The definition of the header is
   in [RFC7615], and any applicable HTTP authentication schemes appear
   in other RFCs.  This header MUST only be used in response messages
   related to client-to-server requests.  This header has hop-by-hop
   scope.

18.36.  Proxy-Authorization

   The Proxy-Authorization request-header field allows the client to
   identify itself (or its user) to a proxy that requires
   authentication.  The Proxy-Authorization field-value consists of
   credentials containing the authentication information of the user
   agent for the proxy or realm of the resource being requested.  The
   definition of the header is in [RFC7235], and any applicable HTTP
   authentication schemes appear in other RFCs, such as Digest [RFC7616]
   and Basic [RFC7617].







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 159]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The HTTP access authentication process is described in [RFC7235].
   Unlike Authorization, the Proxy-Authorization header field applies
   only to the next-hop proxy.  This header MUST only be used in client-
   to-server requests.

18.37.  Proxy-Require

   The Proxy-Require request-header field is used to indicate proxy-
   sensitive features that MUST be supported by the proxy.  Any Proxy-
   Require header features that are not supported by the proxy MUST be
   negatively acknowledged by the proxy to the client using the
   Unsupported header.  The proxy MUST use the 551 (Option Not
   Supported) status code in the response.  Any feature tag included in
   the Proxy-Require does not apply to the endpoint (server or client).
   To ensure that a feature is supported by both proxies and servers,
   the tag needs to be included in also a Require header.

   See Section 18.43 for more details on the mechanics of this message
   and a usage example.  See discussion in the proxies section
   (Section 15.1) about when to consider that a feature requires proxy
   support.

   Example of use:

      Proxy-Require: play.basic

18.38.  Proxy-Supported

   The Proxy-Supported general-header field enumerates all the
   extensions supported by the proxy using feature tags.  The header
   carries the intersection of extensions supported by the forwarding
   proxies.  The Proxy-Supported header MAY be included in any request
   by a proxy.  It MUST be added by any proxy if the Supported header is
   present in a request.  When present in a request, the receiver MUST
   copy the received Proxy-Supported header in the response.

   The Proxy-Supported header field contains a list of feature tags
   applicable to proxies, as described in Section 4.5.  The list is the
   intersection of all feature tags understood by the proxies.  To
   achieve an intersection, the proxy adding the Proxy-Supported header
   includes all proxy feature tags it understands.  Any proxy receiving
   a request with the header MUST check the list and remove any feature
   tag(s) it does not support.  A Proxy-Supported header present in the
   response MUST NOT be modified by the proxies.  These feature tags are
   the ones the proxy chains support in general and are not specific to
   the request resource.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 160]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     C->P1: OPTIONS rtsp://example.com/ RTSP/2.0
            Supported: foo, bar, blech
            User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

    P1->P2: OPTIONS rtsp://example.com/ RTSP/2.0
            Supported: foo, bar, blech
            Proxy-Supported: proxy-foo, proxy-bar, proxy-blech
            Via: 2.0 pro.example.com

    P2->S:  OPTIONS rtsp://example.com/ RTSP/2.0
            Supported: foo, bar, blech
            Proxy-Supported: proxy-foo, proxy-blech
            Via: 2.0 pro.example.com, 2.0 prox2.example.com

     S->C:  RTSP/2.0 200 OK
            Supported: foo, bar, baz
            Proxy-Supported: proxy-foo, proxy-blech
            Public: OPTIONS, SETUP, PLAY, PAUSE, TEARDOWN
            Via: 2.0 pro.example.com, 2.0 prox2.example.com

18.39.  Public

   The Public response-header field lists the set of methods supported
   by the response sender.  This header applies to the general
   capabilities of the sender, and its only purpose is to indicate the
   sender's capabilities to the recipient.  The methods listed may or
   may not be applicable to the Request-URI; the Allow header field
   (Section 18.6) MAY be used to indicate methods allowed for a
   particular URI.

   Example of use:

      Public: OPTIONS, SETUP, PLAY, PAUSE, TEARDOWN

   In the event that there are proxies between the sender and the
   recipient of a response, each intervening proxy MUST modify the
   Public header field to remove any methods that are not supported via
   that proxy.  The resulting Public header field will contain an
   intersection of the sender's methods and the methods allowed through
   by the intervening proxies.

      In general, proxies should allow all methods to transparently pass
      through from the sending RTSP agent to the receiving RTSP agent,
      but there may be cases where this is not desirable for a given
      proxy.  Modification of the Public response-header field by the




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 161]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      intervening proxies ensures that the request sender gets an
      accurate response indicating the methods that can be used on the
      target agent via the proxy chain.

18.40.  Range

   The Range general-header specifies a time range in PLAY
   (Section 13.4), PAUSE (Section 13.6), SETUP (Section 13.3), and
   PLAY_NOTIFY (Section 13.5) requests and responses.  It MAY be
   included in GET_PARAMETER requests from the client to the server with
   only a Range format and no value to request the current media
   position, whether the session is in Play or Ready state in the
   included format.  The server SHALL, if supporting the range format,
   respond with the current playing point or pause point as the start of
   the range.  If an explicit stop point was used in the previous PLAY
   request, then that value shall be included as stop point.  Note that
   if the server is currently under any type of media playback
   manipulation affecting the interpretation of the Range header, like
   scale value other than 1, that fact is also required to be included
   in any GET_PARAMETER response by including the Scale header to
   provide complete information.

   The range can be specified in a number of units.  This specification
   defines smpte (Section 4.4.1), npt (Section 4.4.2), and clock
   (Section 4.4.3) range units.  While octet ranges (Byte Ranges) (see
   Section 2.1 of [RFC7233]) and other extended units MAY be used, their
   behavior is unspecified since they are not normally meaningful in
   RTSP.  Servers supporting the Range header MUST understand the NPT
   range format and SHOULD understand the SMPTE range format.  If the
   Range header is sent in a time format that is not understood, the
   recipient SHOULD return 456 (Header Field Not Valid for Resource) and
   include an Accept-Ranges header indicating the supported time formats
   for the given resource.

   Example:

     Range: clock=19960213T143205Z-

   The Range header contains a range of one single range format.  A
   range is a half-open interval with a start and an end point,
   including the start point but excluding the end point.  A range may
   either be fully specified with explicit values for start point and
   end point or have either the start or end point be implicit.  An
   implicit start point indicates the session's pause point, and if no
   pause point is set, the start of the content.  An implicit end point
   indicates the end of the content.  The usage of both implicit start





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 162]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   and end points is not allowed in the same Range header; however, the
   omission of the Range header has that meaning, i.e., from pause point
   (or start) until end of content.

      As noted, Range headers define half-open intervals.  A range of
      A-B starts exactly at time A, but ends just before B.  Only the
      start time of a media unit such as a video or audio frame is
      relevant.  For example, assume that video frames are generated
      every 40 ms.  A range of 10.0-10.1 would include a video frame
      starting at 10.0 or later time and would include a video frame
      starting at 10.08, even though it lasted beyond the interval.  A
      range of 10.0-10.08, on the other hand, would exclude the frame at
      10.08.

      Please note the difference between NPT timescales' "now" and an
      implicit start value.  Implicit values reference the current
      pause-point, while "now" is the current time.  In a time-
      progressing session with recording (retention for some or full
      time), the pause point may be 2 min into the session while now
      could be 1 hour into the session.

   By default, range intervals increase, where the second point is
   larger than the first point.

   Example:

       Range: npt=10-15

   However, range intervals can also decrease if the Scale header (see
   Section 18.46) indicates a negative scale value.  For example, this
   would be the case when a playback in reverse is desired.

   Example:

       Scale: -1
       Range: npt=15-10

   Decreasing ranges are still half-open intervals as described above.
   Thus, for range A-B, A is closed and B is open.  In the above
   example, 15 is closed and 10 is open.  An exception to this rule is
   the case when B=0 is in a decreasing range.  In this case, the range
   is closed on both ends, as otherwise there would be no way to reach 0
   on a reverse playback for formats that have such a notion, like NPT
   and SMPTE.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 163]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

       Scale: -1
       Range: npt=15-0

   In this range, both 15 and 0 are closed.

   A decreasing range interval without a corresponding negative value in
   the Scale header is not valid.

18.41.  Referrer

   The Referrer request-header field allows the client to specify, for
   the server's benefit, the address (URI) of the resource from which
   the Request-URI was obtained.  The URI refers to that of the
   presentation description, typically retrieved via HTTP.  The Referrer
   request-header allows a server to generate lists of back-links to
   resources for interest, logging, optimized caching, etc.  It also
   allows obsolete or mistyped links to be traced for maintenance.  The
   Referrer field MUST NOT be sent if the Request-URI was obtained from
   a source that does not have its own URI, such as input from the user
   keyboard.

   If the field-value is a relative URI, it SHOULD be interpreted
   relative to the Request-URI.  The URI MUST NOT include a fragment
   identifier.

   Because the source of a link might be private information or might
   reveal an otherwise private information source, it is strongly
   recommended that the user be able to select whether or not the
   Referrer field is sent.  For example, a streaming client could have a
   toggle switch for openly/anonymously, which would respectively
   enable/disable the sending of Referrer and From information.

   Clients SHOULD NOT include a Referrer header field in an (non-secure)
   RTSP request if the referring page was transferred with a secure
   protocol.

18.42.  Request-Status

   This request-header is used to indicate the end result for requests
   that take time to complete, such as PLAY (Section 13.4).  It is sent
   in PLAY_NOTIFY (Section 13.5) with the end-of-stream reason to report
   how the PLAY request concluded, either in success or in failure.  The
   header carries a reference to the request it reports on using the
   CSeq number and the Session ID used in the request reported on.  This
   is not ensured to be unambiguous due to the fact that the CSeq number
   is scoped by the transport connection.  Agents originating requests



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 164]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   can reduce the issue by using a monotonically increasing counter
   across all sequential transports used.  The header provides both a
   numerical status code (according to Section 8.1.1) and a human-
   readable reason phrase.

   Example:
   Request-Status: cseq=63 status=500 reason="Media data unavailable"

   Proxies that renumber the CSeq header need to perform corresponding
   remapping of the cseq parameter in this header when forwarding the
   request to the next-hop agent.

18.43.  Require

   The Require request-header field is used by agents to ensure that the
   other endpoint supports features that are required in respect to this
   request.  It can also be used to query if the other endpoint supports
   certain features; however, the use of the Supported general-header
   (Section 18.51) is much more effective in this purpose.  In case any
   of the feature tags listed by the Require header are not supported by
   the server or client receiving the request, it MUST respond to the
   request using the error code 551 (Option Not Supported) and include
   the Unsupported header listing those feature tags that are NOT
   supported.  This header does not apply to proxies; for the same
   functionality with respect to proxies, see the Proxy-Require header
   (Section 18.37) with the exception of media-modifying proxies.
   Media-modifying proxies, due to their nature of handling media in a
   way that is very similar to a server, do need to understand also the
   server's features to correctly serve the client.

      This is to make sure that the client-server interaction will
      proceed without delay when all features are understood by both
      sides and only slow down if features are not understood (as in the
      example below).  For a well-matched client-server pair, the
      interaction proceeds quickly, saving a round trip often required
      by negotiation mechanisms.  In addition, it also removes state
      ambiguity when the client requires features that the server does
      not understand.













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 165]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example (Not complete):

   C->S:   SETUP rtsp://server.com/foo/bar/baz.rm RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 302
           Require: funky-feature
           Funky-Parameter: funkystuff

   S->C:   RTSP/2.0 551 Option not supported
           CSeq: 302
           Unsupported: funky-feature

   In this example, "funky-feature" is the feature tag that indicates to
   the client that the fictional Funky-Parameter field is required.  The
   relationship between "funky-feature" and Funky-Parameter is not
   communicated via the RTSP exchange, since that relationship is an
   immutable property of "funky-feature" and thus should not be
   transmitted with every exchange.

   Proxies and other intermediary devices MUST ignore this header.  If a
   particular extension requires that intermediate devices support it,
   the extension should be tagged in the Proxy-Require field instead
   (see Section 18.37).  See discussion in the proxies section
   (Section 15.1) about when to consider that a feature requires proxy
   support.

18.44.  Retry-After

   The Retry-After response-header field can be used with a 503 (Service
   Unavailable) or 553 (Proxy Unavailable) response to indicate how long
   the service is expected to be unavailable to the requesting client.
   This field MAY also be used with any 3rr (Redirection) response to
   indicate the minimum time the user agent is asked to wait before
   issuing the redirected request.  A response using 413 (Request
   Message Body Too Large) when the restriction is temporary MAY also
   include the Retry-After header.  The value of this field can be
   either an RTSP-date or an integer number of seconds (in decimal)
   after the time of the response.

   Example:

   Retry-After: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 23:59:59 GMT
   Retry-After: 120

   In the latter example, the delay is 2 minutes.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 166]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.45.  RTP-Info

   The RTP-Info general-header field is used to set RTP-specific
   parameters in the PLAY and GET_PARAMETER responses or PLAY_NOTIFY and
   GET_PARAMETER requests.  For streams using RTP as transport protocol,
   the RTP-Info header SHOULD be part of a 200 response to PLAY.

      The exclusion of the RTP-Info in a PLAY response for RTP-
      transported media will result in a client needing to synchronize
      the media streams using RTCP.  This may have negative impact as
      the RTCP can be lost and does not need to be particularly timely
      in its arrival.  Also, functionality that informs the client from
      which packet a seek has occurred is affected.

   The RTP-Info MAY be included in SETUP responses to provide
   synchronization information when changing transport parameters, see
   Section 13.3.  The RTP-Info header and the Range header MAY be
   included in a GET_PARAMETER request from client to server without any
   values to request the current playback point and corresponding RTP
   synchronization information.  When the RTP-Info header is included in
   a Request, the Range header MUST also be included.  The server
   response SHALL include both the Range header and the RTP-Info header.
   If the session is in Play state, then the value of the Range header
   SHALL be filled in with the current playback point and with the
   corresponding RTP-Info values.  If the server is in another state, no
   values are included in the RTP-Info header.  The header is included
   in PLAY_NOTIFY requests with the Notify-Reason of the end of stream
   to provide RTP information about the end of the stream.

   The header can carry the following parameters:

   url:  Indicates the stream URI for which the following RTP parameters
         correspond; this URI MUST be the same as used in the SETUP
         request for this media stream.  Any relative URI MUST use the
         Request-URI as base URI.  This parameter MUST be present.

   ssrc: The SSRC to which the RTP timestamp and sequence number
         provided applies.  This parameter MUST be present.

   seq:  Indicates the sequence number of the first packet of the stream
         that is direct result of the request.  This allows clients to
         gracefully deal with packets when seeking.  The client uses
         this value to differentiate packets that originated before the
         seek from packets that originated after the seek.  Note that a
         client may not receive the packet with the expressed sequence
         number and instead may receive packets with a higher sequence
         number due to packet loss or reordering.  This parameter is
         RECOMMENDED to be present.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 167]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   rtptime:  MUST indicate the RTP timestamp value corresponding to the
         start time value in the Range response-header or, if not
         explicitly given, the implied start point.  The client uses
         this value to calculate the mapping of RTP time to NPT or other
         media timescale.  This parameter SHOULD be present to ensure
         inter-media synchronization is achieved.  There exists no
         requirement that any received RTP packet will have the same RTP
         timestamp value as the one in the parameter used to establish
         synchronization.

      A mapping from RTP timestamps to NTP format timestamps (wallclock)
      is available via RTCP.  However, this information is not
      sufficient to generate a mapping from RTP timestamps to media
      clock time (NPT, etc.).  Furthermore, in order to ensure that this
      information is available at the necessary time (immediately at
      startup or after a seek), and that it is delivered reliably, this
      mapping is placed in the RTSP control channel.

      In order to compensate for drift for long, uninterrupted
      presentations, RTSP clients should additionally map NPT to NTP,
      using initial RTCP sender reports to do the mapping, and later
      reports to check drift against the mapping.

   Example:

   Range:npt=3.25-15
   RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/foo/audio" ssrc=0A13C760:seq=45102;
            rtptime=12345678,url="rtsp://example.com/foo/video"
            ssrc=9A9DE123:seq=30211;rtptime=29567112

   Lets assume that Audio uses a 16 kHz RTP timestamp clock and Video
   a 90 kHz RTP timestamp clock.  Then, the media synchronization is
   depicted in the following way.

   NPT    3.0---3.1---3.2-X-3.3---3.4---3.5---3.6
   Audio               PA A
   Video                  V    PV

   X: NPT time value = 3.25, from Range header.
   A: RTP timestamp value for Audio from RTP-Info header (12345678).
   V: RTP timestamp value for Video from RTP-Info header (29567112).
   PA: RTP audio packet carrying an RTP timestamp of 12344878, which
       corresponds to NPT = (12344878 - A) / 16000 + 3.25 = 3.2
   PV: RTP video packet carrying an RTP timestamp of 29573412, which
       corresponds to NPT = (29573412 - V) / 90000 + 3.25 = 3.32






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 168]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.46.  Scale

   The Scale general-header indicates the requested or used view rate
   for the media resource being played back.  A scale value of 1
   indicates normal play at the normal forward viewing rate.  If not 1,
   the value corresponds to the rate with respect to normal viewing
   rate.  For example, a value of 2 indicates twice the normal viewing
   rate ("fast forward") and a value of 0.5 indicates half the normal
   viewing rate.  In other words, a value of 2 has content time increase
   at twice the playback time.  For every second of elapsed (wallclock)
   time, 2 seconds of content time will be delivered.  A negative value
   indicates reverse direction.  For certain media transports, this may
   require certain considerations to work consistently; see Appendix C.1
   for description on how RTP handles this.

   The transmitted-data rate SHOULD NOT be changed by selection of a
   different scale value.  The resulting bitrate should be reasonably
   close to the nominal bitrate of the content for scale = 1.  The
   server has to actively manipulate the data when needed to meet the
   bitrate constraints.  Implementation of scale changes depends on the
   server and media type.  For video, a server may, for example, deliver
   only key frames or selected frames.  For audio, it may time-scale the
   audio while preserving pitch or, less desirably, deliver fragments of
   audio, or completely mute the audio.

   The server and content may restrict the range of scale values that it
   supports.  The supported values are indicated by the Media-Properties
   header (Section 18.29).  The client SHOULD only indicate request
   values to be supported.  However, as the values may change as the
   content progresses, a requested value may no longer be valid when the
   request arrives.  Thus, a non-supported value in a request does not
   generate an error, it only forces the server to choose the closest
   value.  The response MUST always contain the actual scale value
   chosen by the server.

   If the server does not implement the possibility to scale, it will
   not return a Scale header.  A server supporting scale operations for
   PLAY MUST indicate this with the use of the "play.scale" feature tag.

   When indicating a negative scale for a reverse playback, the Range
   header MUST indicate a decreasing range as described in
   Section 18.40.

   Example of playing in reverse at 3.5 times normal rate:

     Scale: -3.5
     Range: npt=15-10




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 169]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.47.  Seek-Style

   When a client sends a PLAY request with a Range header to perform a
   random access to the media, the client does not know if the server
   will pick the first media samples or the first random access point
   prior to the request range.  Depending on the use case, the client
   may have a strong preference.  To express this preference and provide
   the client with information on how the server actually acted on that
   preference, the Seek-Style general-header is defined.

   Seek-Style is a general-header that MAY be included in any PLAY
   request to indicate the client's preference for any media stream that
   has the random access properties.  The server MUST always include the
   header in any PLAY response for media with random access properties
   to indicate what policy was applied.  A server that receives an
   unknown Seek-Style policy MUST ignore it and select the server
   default policy.  A client receiving an unknown policy MUST ignore it
   and use the Range header and any media synchronization information as
   basis to determine what the server did.

   This specification defines the following seek policies that may be
   requested (see also Section 4.7.1):

   RAP:  Random Access Point (RAP) is the behavior of requesting the
      server to locate the closest previous random access point that
      exists in the media aggregate and deliver from that.  By
      requesting a RAP, media quality will be the best possible as all
      media will be delivered from a point where full media state can be
      established in the media decoder.

   CoRAP:  Conditional Random Access Point (CoRAP) is a variant of the
      above RAP behavior.  This policy is primarily intended for cases
      where there is larger distance between the random access points in
      the media.  CoRAP uses the RAP policy if the condition that there
      is a Random Access Point closer to the requested start point than
      to the current pause point is fulfilled.  Otherwise, no seeking is
      performed and playback will continue from the current pause point.
      This policy assumes that the media state existing prior to the
      pause is usable if delivery is continued.  If the client or server
      knows that this is not the fact, the RAP policy should be used.
      In other words, in most cases when the client requests a start
      point prior to the current pause point, a valid decoding
      dependency chain from the media delivered prior to the pause and
      to the requested media unit will not exist.  If the server
      searched to a random access point, the server MUST return the
      CoRAP policy in the Seek-Style header and adjust the Range header
      to reflect the position of the selected RAP.  In case the random
      access point is farther away and the server chooses to continue



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 170]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      from the current pause point, it MUST include the "Next" policy in
      the Seek-Style header and adjust the Range header start point to
      the current pause point.

   First-Prior:  The first-prior policy will start delivery with the
      media unit that has a playout time first prior to the requested
      time.  For discrete media, that would only include media units
      that would still be rendered at the request time.  For continuous
      media, that is media that will be rendered during the requested
      start time of the range.

   Next:  The next media units after the provided start time of the
      range: for continuous framed media, that would mean the first next
      frame after the provided time and for discrete media, the first
      unit that is to be rendered after the provided time.  The main
      usage for this case is when the client knows it has all media up
      to a certain point and would like to continue delivery so that a
      complete uninterrupted media playback can be achieved.  An example
      of such a scenario would be switching from a broadcast/multicast
      delivery to a unicast-based delivery.  This policy MUST only be
      used on the client's explicit request.

   Please note that these expressed preferences exist for optimizing the
   startup time or the media quality.  The "Next" policy breaks the
   normal definition of the Range header to enable a client to request
   media with minimal overlap, although some may still occur for
   aggregated sessions.  RAP and First-Prior both fulfill the
   requirement of providing media from the requested range and forward.
   However, unless RAP is used, the media quality for many media codecs
   using predictive methods can be severely degraded unless additional
   data is available as, for example, already buffered, or through other
   side channels.

18.48.  Server

   The Server general-header field contains information about the
   software used by the origin server to create or handle the request.
   This field can contain multiple product tokens and comments
   identifying the server and any significant subproducts.  The product
   tokens are listed in order of their significance for identifying the
   application.

   Example:

   Server: PhonyServer/1.0






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 171]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   If the response is being forwarded through a proxy, the proxy
   application MUST NOT modify the Server response-header.  Instead, it
   SHOULD include a Via field (Section 18.57).  If the response is
   generated by the proxy, the proxy application MUST return the Server
   response-header as previously returned by the server.

18.49.  Session

   The Session general-header field identifies an RTSP session.  An RTSP
   session is created by the server as a result of a successful SETUP
   request, and in the response, the session identifier is given to the
   client.  The RTSP session exists until destroyed by a TEARDOWN or a
   REDIRECT or is timed out by the server.

   The session identifier is chosen by the server (see Section 4.3) and
   MUST be returned in the SETUP response.  Once a client receives a
   session identifier, it MUST be included in any request related to
   that session.  This means that the Session header MUST be included in
   a request, using the following methods: PLAY, PAUSE, PLAY_NOTIFY and
   TEARDOWN.  It MAY be included in SETUP, OPTIONS, SET_PARAMETER,
   GET_PARAMETER, and REDIRECT.  It MUST NOT be included in DESCRIBE.
   The Session header MUST NOT be included in the following methods, if
   these requests are pipelined and if the session identifier is not yet
   known: PLAY, PAUSE, TEARDOWN, SETUP, OPTIONS SET_PARAMETER, and
   GET_PARAMETER.

   In an RTSP response, the session header MUST be included in methods,
   SETUP, PLAY, PAUSE, and PLAY_NOTIFY, and it MAY be included in
   methods TEARDOWN and REDIRECT.  If included in the request of the
   following methods it MUST also be included in the response: OPTIONS,
   GET_PARAMETER, and SET_PARAMETER.  It MUST NOT be included in
   DESCRIBE responses.

   Note that a session identifier identifies an RTSP session across
   transport sessions or connections.  RTSP requests for a given session
   can use different URIs (Presentation and media URIs).  Note, that
   there are restrictions depending on the session as to which URIs are
   acceptable for a given method.  However, multiple "user" sessions for
   the same URI from the same client will require use of different
   session identifiers.

      The session identifier is needed to distinguish several delivery
      requests for the same URI coming from the same client.

   The response 454 (Session Not Found) MUST be returned if the session
   identifier is invalid.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 172]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The header MAY include a parameter for session timeout period.  If
   not explicitly provided, this value is set to 60 seconds.  As this
   affects how often session keep-alives are needed, values smaller than
   30 seconds are not recommended.  However, larger-than-default values
   can be useful in applications of RTSP that have inactive but
   established sessions for longer time periods.

      The 60-second value was chosen as the session timeout value as it
      results in keep-alive messages that are not too frequent and low
      sensitivity to variations in request/response timing.  If one
      reduces the timeout value to below 30 seconds, the corresponding
      request/response timeout becomes a significant part of the session
      timeout.  The 60-second value also allows for reasonably rapid
      recovery of committed server resources in case of client failure.

18.50.  Speed

   The Speed general-header field requests the server to deliver
   specific amounts of nominal media time per unit of delivery time,
   contingent on the server's ability and desire to serve the media
   stream at the given speed.  The client requests the delivery speed to
   be within a given range with a lower and upper bound.  The server
   SHALL deliver at the highest possible speed within the range, but not
   faster than the upper bound, for which the underlying network path
   can support the resulting transport data rates.  As long as any speed
   value within the given range can be provided, the server SHALL NOT
   modify the media quality.  Only if the server is unable to deliver
   media at the speed value provided by the lower bound shall it reduce
   the media quality.

   Implementation of the Speed functionality by the server is OPTIONAL.
   The server can indicate its support through a feature tag,
   play.speed.  The lack of a Speed header in the response is an
   indication of lack of support of this functionality.

   The speed parameter values are expressed as a positive decimal value,
   e.g., a value of 2.0 indicates that data is to be delivered twice as
   fast as normal.  A speed value of zero is invalid.  The range is
   specified in the form "lower bound - upper bound".  The lower-bound
   value may be smaller or equal to the upper bound.  All speeds may not
   be possible to support.  Therefore, the server MAY modify the
   requested values to the closest supported.  The actual supported
   speed MUST be included in the response.  However, note that the use
   cases may vary and that Speed value ranges such as 0.7-0.8, 0.3-2.0,
   1.0-2.5, and 2.5-2.5 all have their usages.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 173]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     Speed: 1.0-2.5

   Use of this header changes the bandwidth used for data delivery.  It
   is meant for use in specific circumstances where delivery of the
   presentation at a higher or lower rate is desired.  The main use
   cases are buffer operations or local scale operations.  Implementers
   should keep in mind that bandwidth for the session may be negotiated
   beforehand (by means other than RTSP) and, therefore, renegotiation
   may be necessary.  To perform Speed operations, the server needs to
   ensure that the network path can support the resulting bitrate.
   Thus, the media transport needs to support feedback so that the
   server can react and adapt to the available bitrate.

18.51.  Supported

   The Supported general-header enumerates all the extensions supported
   by the client or server using feature tags.  The header carries the
   extensions supported by the message-sending client or server.  The
   Supported header MAY be included in any request.  When present in a
   request, the receiver MUST respond with its corresponding Supported
   header.  Note that the Supported header is also included in 4xx and
   5xx responses.

   The Supported header contains a list of feature tags, described in
   Section 4.5, that are understood by the client or server.  These
   feature tags are the ones the server or client supports in general
   and are not specific to the request resource.

   Example:

     C->S:  OPTIONS rtsp://example.com/ RTSP/2.0
            Supported: foo, bar, blech
            User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C:  RTSP/2.0 200 OK
            Supported: bar, blech, baz













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 174]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.52.  Terminate-Reason

   The Terminate-Reason request-header allows the server, when sending a
   REDIRECT or TEARDOWN request, to provide a reason for the session
   termination and any additional information.  This specification
   identifies three reasons for Redirections and may be extended in the
   future:

   Server-Admin:  The server needs to be shut down for some
      administrative reason.

   Session-Timeout:  A client's session has been kept alive for extended
      periods of time and the server has determined that it needs to
      reclaim the resources associated with this session.

   Internal-Error  An internal error that is impossible to recover from
      has occurred, forcing the server to terminate the session.

   The Server may provide additional parameters containing information
   around the redirect.  This specification defines the following ones.

   time:  Provides a wallclock time when the server will stop providing
      any service.

   user-msg:  A UTF-8 text string with a message from the server to the
      user.  This message SHOULD be displayed to the user.

18.53.  Timestamp

   The Timestamp general-header describes when the agent sent the
   request.  The value of the timestamp is of significance only to the
   agent and may use any timescale.  The responding agent MUST echo the
   exact same value and MAY, if it has accurate information about this,
   add a floating-point number indicating the number of seconds that has
   elapsed since it has received the request.  The timestamp can be used
   by the agent to compute the round-trip time to the responding agent
   so that it can adjust the timeout value for retransmissions when
   running over an unreliable protocol.  It also resolves retransmission
   ambiguities for unreliable transport of RTSP.

   Note that the present specification provides only for reliable
   transport of RTSP messages.  The Timestamp general-header is
   specified in case the protocol is extended in the future to use
   unreliable transport.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 175]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.54.  Transport

   The Transport general-header indicates which transport protocol is to
   be used and configures its parameters such as destination address,
   compression, multicast time-to-live and destination port for a single
   stream.  It sets those values not already determined by a
   presentation description.

   A Transport request-header MAY contain a list of transport options
   acceptable to the client, in the form of multiple transport
   specification entries.  Transport specifications are comma separated
   and listed in decreasing order of preference.  Each transport
   specification consists of a transport protocol identifier, followed
   by any number of parameters separated by semicolons.  A Transport
   request-header MAY contain multiple transport specifications using
   the same transport protocol identifier.  The server MUST return a
   Transport response-header in the response to indicate the values
   actually chosen, if any.  If no transport specification is supported,
   no transport header is returned and the response MUST use the status
   code 461 (Unsupported Transport) (Section 17.4.25).  In case more
   than one transport specification was present in the request, the
   server MUST return the single transport specification (transport-
   spec) that was actually chosen, if any.  The number of transport-spec
   entries is expected to be limited as the client will receive guidance
   on what configurations are possible from the presentation
   description.

   The Transport header MAY also be used in subsequent SETUP requests to
   change transport parameters.  A server MAY refuse to change
   parameters of an existing stream.

   The transport protocol identifier defines, for each transport
   specification, which transport protocol to use and any related rules.
   Each transport protocol identifier defines the parameters that are
   required to occur; additional optional parameters MAY occur.  This
   flexibility is provided as parameters may be different and provide
   different options to the RTSP agent.  A transport specification may
   only contain one of any given parameter within it.  A parameter
   consists of a name and optionally a value string.  Parameters MAY be
   given in any order.  Additionally, a transport specification may only
   contain either the unicast or the multicast transport type parameter.
   The transport protocol identifier, and all parameters, need to be
   understood in a transport specification; if not, the transport
   specification MUST be ignored.  An RTSP proxy of any type that uses
   or modifies the transport specification, e.g., access proxy or
   security proxy, MUST remove specifications with unknown parameters





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 176]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   before forwarding the RTSP message.  If that results in no remaining
   transport specification, the proxy SHALL send a 461 (Unsupported
   Transport) (Section 17.4.25) response without any Transport header.

      The Transport header is restricted to describing a single media
      stream.  (RTSP can also control multiple streams as a single
      entity.)  Making it part of RTSP rather than relying on a
      multitude of session description formats greatly simplifies
      designs of firewalls.

   The general syntax for the transport protocol identifier is a list of
   slash-separated tokens:

   Value1/Value2/Value3...

   Which, for RTP transports, takes the form:

   RTP/profile/lower-transport.

   The default value for the "lower-transport" parameters is specific to
   the profile.  For RTP/AVP, the default is UDP.

   There are two different methods for how to specify where the media
   should be delivered for unicast transport:

   dest_addr:  The presence of this parameter and its values indicates
         the destination address or addresses (host address and port
         pairs for IP flows) necessary for the media transport.

   No dest_addr:  The lack of the dest_addr parameter indicates that the
         server MUST send media to the same address from which the RTSP
         messages originates.

   The choice of method for indicating where the media is to be
   delivered depends on the use case.  In some cases, the only allowed
   method will be to use no explicit address indication and have the
   server deliver media to the source of the RTSP messages.

   For multicast, there are several methods for specifying addresses,
   but they are different in how they work compared with unicast:

   dest_addr with client picked address:  The address and relevant
         parameters, like TTL (scope), for the actual multicast group to
         deliver the media to.  There are security implications
         (Section 21) with this method that need to be addressed because
         an RTSP server can be used as a DoS attacker on an existing
         multicast group.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 177]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   dest_addr using Session Description Information:  The information
         included in the transport header can all be coming from the
         session description, e.g., the SDP "c=" and "m=" lines.  This
         mitigates some of the security issues of the previous methods
         as it is the session provider that picks the multicast group
         and scope.  The client MUST include the information if it is
         available in the session description.

   No dest_addr:  The behavior when no explicit multicast group is
         present in a request is not defined.

   An RTSP proxy will need to take care.  If the media is not desired to
   be routed through the proxy, the proxy will need to introduce the
   destination indication.

   Below are the configuration parameters associated with transport:

   General parameters:

   unicast / multicast:  This parameter is a mutually exclusive
         indication of whether unicast or multicast delivery will be
         attempted.  One of the two values MUST be specified.  Clients
         that are capable of handling both unicast and multicast
         transmission need to indicate such capability by including two
         full transport-specs with separate parameters for each.

   layers:  The number of multicast layers to be used for this media
         stream.  The layers are sent to consecutive addresses starting
         at the dest_addr address.  If the parameter is not included, it
         defaults to a single layer.

   dest_addr:  A general destination address parameter that can contain
         one or more address specifications.  Each combination of
         protocol/profile/lower transport needs to have the format and
         interpretation of its address specification defined.  For
         RTP/AVP/UDP and RTP/AVP/TCP, the address specification is a
         tuple containing a host address and port.  Note, only a single
         destination parameter per transport spec is intended.  The
         usage of multiple destinations to distribute a single media to
         multiple entities is unspecified.

         The client originating the RTSP request MAY specify the
         destination address of the stream recipient with the host
         address as part of the tuple.  When the destination address is
         specified, the recipient may be a different party than the
         originator of the request.  To avoid becoming the unwitting
         perpetrator of a remote-controlled DoS attack, a server MUST
         perform security checks (see Section 21.2.1) and SHOULD log



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 178]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


         such attempts before allowing the client to direct a media
         stream to a recipient address not chosen by the server.
         Implementations cannot rely on TCP as a reliable means of
         client identification.  If the server does not allow the host
         address part of the tuple to be set, it MUST return 463
         (Destination Prohibited).

         The host address part of the tuple MAY be empty, for example
         ":58044", in cases when it is desired to specify only the
         destination port.  Responses to requests including the
         Transport header with a dest_addr parameter SHOULD include the
         full destination address that is actually used by the server.
         The server MUST NOT remove address information that is already
         present in the request when responding, unless the protocol
         requires it.

   src_addr:  A general source address parameter that can contain one or
         more address specifications.  Each combination of
         protocol/profile/lower transport needs to have the format and
         interpretation of its address specification defined.  For
         RTP/AVP/UDP and RTP/AVP/TCP, the address specification is a
         tuple containing a host address and port.

         This parameter MUST be specified by the server if it transmits
         media packets from an address other than the one RTSP messages
         are sent to.  This will allow the client to verify the source
         address and give it a destination address for its RTCP feedback
         packets, if RTP is used.  The address or addresses indicated in
         the src_addr parameter SHOULD be used both for the sending and
         receiving of the media stream's data packets.  The main reasons
         are threefold: First, indicating the port and source address(s)
         lets the receiver know where from the packets is expected to
         originate.  Second, traversal of NATs is greatly simplified
         when traffic is flowing symmetrically over a NAT binding.
         Third, certain NAT traversal mechanisms need to know to which
         address and port to send so-called "binding packets" from the
         receiver to the sender, thus creating an address binding in the
         NAT that the sender-to-receiver packet flow can use.

            This information may also be available through SDP.
            However, since this is more a feature of transport than
            media initialization, the authoritative source for this
            information should be in the SETUP response.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 179]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   mode: The mode parameter indicates the methods to be supported for
         this session.  The currently defined valid value is "PLAY".  If
         not provided, the default is "PLAY".  The "RECORD" value was
         defined in RFC 2326; in this specification, it is unspecified
         but reserved.  RECORD and other values may be specified in the
         future.

   interleaved:  The interleaved parameter implies mixing the media
         stream with the control stream in whatever protocol is being
         used by the control stream, using the mechanism defined in
         Section 14.  The argument provides the channel number to be
         used in the $ block (see Section 14) and MUST be present.  This
         parameter MAY be specified as an interval, e.g.,
         interleaved=4-5 in cases where the transport choice for the
         media stream requires it, e.g., for RTP with RTCP.  The channel
         number given in the request is only a guidance from the client
         to the server on what channel number(s) to use.  The server MAY
         set any valid channel number in the response.  The declared
         channels are bidirectional, so both end parties MAY send data
         on the given channel.  One example of such usage is the second
         channel used for RTCP, where both server and client send RTCP
         packets on the same channel.

            This allows RTP/RTCP to be handled similarly to the way that
            it is done with UDP, i.e., one channel for RTP and the other
            for RTCP.

   MIKEY:  This parameter is used in conjunction with transport
         specifications that can utilize MIKEY [RFC3830] for security
         context establishment.  So far, only the SRTP-based RTP
         profiles SAVP and SAVPF can utilize MIKEY, and this is defined
         in Appendix C.1.4.1.  This parameter can be included both in
         request and response messages.  The binary MIKEY message SHALL
         be Base64-encoded [RFC4648] before being included in the value
         part of the parameter, where the encoding adheres to the
         definition in Section 4 of RFC 4648 and where the padding bits
         are set to zero.

   Multicast-specific:

   ttl:  multicast time-to-live for IPv4.  When included in requests,
         the value indicates the TTL value that the client requests the
         server to use.  In a response, the value actually being used by
         the server is returned.  A server will need to consider what
         values that are reasonable and also the authority of the user
         to set this value.  Corresponding functions are not needed for
         IPv6 as the scoping is part of the IPv6 multicast address
         [RFC4291].



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 180]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTP-specific:

   These parameters MAY only be used if the media-transport protocol is
   RTP.

   ssrc: The ssrc parameter, if included in a SETUP response, indicates
         the RTP SSRC [RFC3550] value(s) that will be used by the media
         server for RTP packets within the stream.  The values are
         expressed as a slash-separated sequence of SSRC values, each
         SSRC expressed as an eight-digit hexadecimal value.

         The ssrc parameter MUST NOT be specified in requests.  The
         functionality of specifying the ssrc parameter in a SETUP
         request is deprecated as it is incompatible with the
         specification of RTP [RFC3550].  If the parameter is included
         in the Transport header of a SETUP request, the server SHOULD
         ignore it, and choose appropriate SSRCs for the stream.  The
         server SHOULD set the ssrc parameter in the Transport header of
         the response.

   RTCP-mux:  Used to negotiate the usage of RTP and RTCP multiplexing
         [RFC5761] on a single underlying transport stream/flow.  The
         presence of this parameter in a SETUP request indicates the
         client's support and requires the server to use RTP and RTCP
         multiplexing.  The client SHALL only include one transport
         stream in the Transport header specification.  To provide the
         server with a choice between using RTP/RTCP multiplexing or
         not, two different transport header specifications must be
         included.

   The parameter setup and connection defined below MAY only be used if
   the media-transport protocol of the lower-level transport is
   connection oriented (such as TCP).  However, these parameters MUST
   NOT be used when interleaving data over the RTSP connection.

   setup:  Clients use the setup parameter on the Transport line in a
         SETUP request to indicate the roles it wishes to play in a TCP
         connection.  This parameter is adapted from [RFC4145].  The use
         of this parameter in RTP/AVP/TCP non-interleaved transport is
         discussed in Appendix C.2.2; the discussion below is limited to
         syntactic issues.  Clients may specify the following values for
         the setup parameter:

         active:  The client will initiate an outgoing connection.

         passive:  The client will accept an incoming connection.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 181]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


         actpass:  The client is willing to accept an incoming
            connection or to initiate an outgoing connection.

         If a client does not specify a setup value, the "active" value
         is assumed.

         In response to a client SETUP request where the setup parameter
         is set to "active", a server's 2xx reply MUST assign the setup
         parameter to "passive" on the Transport header line.

         In response to a client SETUP request where the setup parameter
         is set to "passive", a server's 2xx reply MUST assign the setup
         parameter to "active" on the Transport header line.

         In response to a client SETUP request where the setup parameter
         is set to "actpass", a server's 2xx reply MUST assign the setup
         parameter to "active" or "passive" on the Transport header
         line.

         Note that the "holdconn" value for setup is not defined for
         RTSP use, and MUST NOT appear on a Transport line.

   connection:  Clients use the connection parameter in a transport
         specification part of the Transport header in a SETUP request
         to indicate the client's preference for either reusing an
         existing connection between client and server (in which case
         the client sets the "connection" parameter to "existing") or
         requesting the creation of a new connection between client and
         server (in which cast the client sets the "connection"
         parameter to "new").  Typically, clients use the "new" value
         for the first SETUP request for a URL, and "existing" for
         subsequent SETUP requests for a URL.

         If a client SETUP request assigns the "new" value to
         "connection", the server response MUST also assign the "new"
         value to "connection" on the Transport line.

         If a client SETUP request assigns the "existing" value to
         "connection", the server response MUST assign a value of
         "existing" or "new" to "connection" on the Transport line, at
         its discretion.

         The default value of "connection" is "existing", for all SETUP
         requests (initial and subsequent).

   The combination of transport protocol, profile and lower transport
   needs to be defined.  A number of combinations are defined in the
   Appendix C.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 182]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Below is a usage example, showing a client advertising the capability
   to handle multicast or unicast, preferring multicast.  Since this is
   a unicast-only stream, the server responds with the proper transport
   parameters for unicast.

     C->S: SETUP rtsp://example.com/foo/bar/baz.rm RTSP/2.0
           CSeq: 302
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;mode="PLAY",
               RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr="192.0.2.5:3456"/
               "192.0.2.5:3457";mode="PLAY"
           Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
           User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

     S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 302
           Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
           Session: rQi1hBrGlFdiYld241FxUO
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr="192.0.2.5:3456"/
              "192.0.2.5:3457";src_addr="192.0.2.224:6256"/
              "192.0.2.224:6257";mode="PLAY"
           Accept-Ranges: npt
           Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.6, Dynamic,
                             Time-Limited=20081128T165900

18.55.  Unsupported

   The Unsupported response-header lists the features not supported by
   the responding RTSP agent.  In the case where the feature was
   specified via the Proxy-Require field (Section 18.37), if there is a
   proxy on the path between the client and the server, the proxy MUST
   send a response message with a status code of 551 (Option Not
   Supported).  The request MUST NOT be forwarded.

   See Section 18.43 for a usage example.

















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 183]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


18.56.  User-Agent

   The User-Agent general-header field contains information about the
   user agent originating the request or producing a response.  This is
   for statistical purposes, the tracing of protocol violations, and
   automated recognition of user agents for the sake of tailoring
   responses to avoid particular user agent limitations.  User agents
   SHOULD include this field with requests.  The field can contain
   multiple product tokens and comments identifying the agent and any
   subproducts which form a significant part of the user agent.  By
   convention, the product tokens are listed in order of their
   significance for identifying the application.

   Example:

   User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

18.57.  Via

   The Via general-header field MUST be used by proxies to indicate the
   intermediate protocols and recipients between the user agent and the
   server on requests and between the origin server and the client on
   responses.  The field is intended to be used for tracking message
   forwards, avoiding request loops, and identifying the protocol
   capabilities of all senders along the request/response chain.

   Each of multiple values in the Via field represents each proxy that
   has forwarded the message.  Each recipient MUST append its
   information such that the end result is ordered according to the
   sequence of forwarding applications.  So messages originating with
   the client or server do not include the Via header.  The first proxy
   or other intermediate adds the header and its information into the
   field.  Any additional intermediate adds additional field-values.
   Resulting in the server seeing the chains of intermediates in a
   client-to-server request and the client seeing the full chain in the
   response message.

   Proxies (e.g., Access Proxy or Translator Proxy) SHOULD NOT, by
   default, forward the names and ports of hosts within the private/
   protected region.  This information SHOULD only be propagated if
   explicitly enabled.  If not enabled, the via-received of any host
   behind the firewall/NAT SHOULD be replaced by an appropriate
   pseudonym for that host.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 184]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   For organizations that have strong privacy requirements for hiding
   internal structures, a proxy MAY combine an ordered subsequence of
   Via header field entries with identical sent-protocol values into a
   single such entry.  Applications MUST NOT combine entries that have
   different received-protocol values.

18.58.  WWW-Authenticate

   The WWW-Authenticate header is specified in [RFC7235]; its usage
   depends on the used authentication schemes, such as Digest [RFC7616]
   and Basic [RFC7617].  The WWW-Authenticate response-header field MUST
   be included in 401 (Unauthorized) response messages.  The field-value
   consists of at least one challenge that indicates the authentication
   scheme(s) and parameters applicable to the Request-URI.  This header
   MUST only be used in response messages related to client to server
   requests.

   The HTTP access authentication process is described in [RFC7235] with
   some clarification in Section 19.1.  User agents are advised to take
   special care in parsing the WWW-Authenticate field-value as it might
   contain more than one challenge, or if more than one WWW-Authenticate
   header field is provided, the contents of a challenge itself can
   contain a comma-separated list of authentication parameters.

19.  Security Framework

   The RTSP security framework consists of two high-level components:
   the pure authentication mechanisms based on HTTP authentication and
   the message transport protection based on TLS, which is independent
   of RTSP.  Because of the similarity in syntax and usage between RTSP
   servers and HTTP servers, the security for HTTP is reused to a large
   extent.

19.1.  RTSP and HTTP Authentication

   RTSP and HTTP share common authentication schemes; thus, they follow
   the same framework as specified in [RFC7235].  RTSP uses the
   corresponding RTSP error codes (401 and 407) and headers (WWW-
   Authenticate, Authorization, Proxy-Authenticate, Proxy-Authorization)
   by importing the definitions from [RFC7235].  Servers SHOULD
   implement both the Basic [RFC7617] and the Digest [RFC7616]
   authentication schemes.  Clients MUST implement both the Basic and
   the Digest authentication schemes so that a server that requires the
   client to authenticate can trust that the capability is present.  If
   implementing the Digest authentication scheme, then the additional
   considerations specified below in Section 19.1.1 MUST be followed.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 185]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   It should be stressed that using the HTTP authentication alone does
   not provide full RTSP message security.  Therefore, TLS SHOULD be
   used; see Section 19.2.  Any RTSP message containing an Authorization
   header using the Basic authentication scheme MUST be using a TLS
   connection with confidentiality protection enabled, i.e., no NULL
   encryption.

   In cases where there is a chain of proxies between the client and the
   server, each proxy may individually request the client or previous
   proxy to authenticate itself.  This is done using the Proxy-
   Authenticate (Section 18.34), the Proxy-Authorization
   (Section 18.36), and the Proxy-Authentication-Info (Section 18.35)
   headers.  These headers are hop-by-hop headers and are only scoped to
   the current connection and hop.  Thus, if a proxy chain exists, a
   proxy connecting to another proxy will have to act as a client to
   authorize itself towards the next proxy.  The WWW-Authenticate
   (Section 18.58), Authorization (Section 18.8), and Authentication-
   Info (Section 18.7) headers are end-to-end and MUST NOT be modified
   by proxies.

   This authentication mechanism works only for client-to-server
   requests as currently defined.  This leaves server-to-client request
   outside of the context of TLS-based communication more vulnerable to
   message-injection attacks on the client.  Based on the server-to-
   client methods that exist, the potential risks are various: hijacking
   (REDIRECT), denial of service (TEARDOWN and PLAY_NOTIFY), or attacks
   with uncertain results (SET_PARAMETER).

19.1.1.  Digest Authentication

   This section describes the modifications and clarifications required
   to apply the HTTP Digest authentication scheme to RTSP.  The RTSP
   scheme usage is almost completely identical to that for HTTP
   [RFC7616].  These modifications are based on the procedures defined
   for SIP 2.0 [RFC3261] (in Section 22.4) but updated to use RFC 7235,
   RFC 7616 and RFC 7615 instead of RFC 2617.

   Digest authentication uses two additional headers, Authentication-
   Info and Proxy-Authentication-Info, that are defined as in [RFC7615].
   The rules for Digest authentication follow those defined in
   [RFC7616], with "HTTP/1.1" replaced by "RTSP/2.0" in addition to the
   following differences:

   1.  Use the ABNF specified in the referenced documents, with the
       difference that the URI parameter uses the request URI format for
       RTSP, i.e. the ABNF element: Request-URI (see Section 20.2.1).
       The domain parameter uses the RTSP-URI-Ref element for absolute
       and relative URIs.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 186]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   2.  If MTags are used, then the example procedure for choosing a
       nonce based on ETag can work, based on replacing the ETag with
       the MTag.

   3.  As a clarification to the calculation of the A2 value for message
       integrity assurance in the Digest authentication scheme,
       implementers should assume, when the entity-body is empty (that
       is, when the RTSP messages have no message body) that the hash of
       the message body resolves to the hash of an empty string, or:
       H(entity-body), example MD5("") =
       "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e".

19.2.  RTSP over TLS

   RTSP agents MUST implement RTSP over TLS as defined in this section
   and the next Section 19.3.  RTSP MUST follow the same guidelines with
   regard to TLS [RFC5246] usage as specified for HTTP; see [RFC2818].
   RTSP over TLS is separated from unsecured RTSP both on the URI level
   and the port level.  Instead of using the "rtsp" scheme identifier in
   the URI, the "rtsps" scheme identifier MUST be used to signal RTSP
   over TLS.  If no port is given in a URI with the "rtsps" scheme, port
   322 MUST be used for TLS over TCP/IP.

   When a client tries to set up an insecure channel to the server
   (using the "rtsp" URI), and the policy for the resource requires a
   secure channel, the server MUST redirect the client to the secure
   service by sending a 301 redirect response code together with the
   correct Location URI (using the "rtsps" scheme).  A user or client
   MAY upgrade a non secured URI to a secured by changing the scheme
   from "rtsp" to "rtsps".  A server implementing support for "rtsps"
   MUST allow this.

   It should be noted that TLS allows for mutual authentication (when
   using both server and client certificates).  Still, one of the more
   common ways TLS is used is to provide only server-side authentication
   (often to avoid client certificates).  TLS is then used in addition
   to HTTP authentication, providing transport security and server
   authentication, while HTTP Authentication is used to authenticate the
   client.

   RTSP includes the possibility to keep a TCP session up between the
   client and server, throughout the RTSP session lifetime.  It may be
   convenient to keep the TCP session, not only to save the extra setup
   time for TCP, but also the extra setup time for TLS (even if TLS uses
   the resume function, there will be almost two extra round trips).
   Still, when TLS is used, such behavior introduces extra active state
   in the server, not only for TCP and RTSP, but also for TLS.  This may
   increase the vulnerability to DoS attacks.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 187]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   There exists a potential security vulnerability when reusing TCP and
   TLS state for different resources (URIs).  If two different hostnames
   point at the same IP address, it can be desirable to reuse the TCP/
   TLS connection to that server.  In that case, the RTSP agent having
   the TCP/TLS connection MUST verify that the server certificate
   associated with the connection has a SubjectAltName matching the
   hostname present in the URI for the resource an RTSP request is to be
   issued.

   In addition to these recommendations, Section 19.3 gives further
   recommendations of TLS usage with proxies.

19.3.  Security and Proxies

   The nature of a proxy is often to act as a "man in the middle", while
   security is often about preventing the existence of one.  This
   section provides clients with the possibility to use proxies even
   when applying secure transports (TLS) between the RTSP agents.  The
   TLS proxy mechanism allows for server and proxy identification using
   certificates.  However, the client cannot be identified based on
   certificates.  The client needs to select between using the procedure
   specified below or using a TLS connection directly (bypassing any
   proxies) to the server.  The choice may be dependent on policies.

   In general, there are two categories of proxies: the transparent
   proxies (of which the client is not aware) and the non-transparent
   proxies (of which the client is aware).  This memo specifies only
   non-transparent RTSP proxies, i.e., proxies visible to the RTSP
   client and RTSP server.  An infrastructure based on proxies requires
   that the trust model be such that both client and server can trust
   the proxies to handle the RTSP messages correctly.  To be able to
   trust a proxy, the client and server also need to be aware of the
   proxy.  Hence, transparent proxies cannot generally be seen as
   trusted and will not work well with security (unless they work only
   at the transport layer).  In the rest of this section, any reference
   to "proxy" will be to a non-transparent proxy, which inspects or
   manipulates the RTSP messages.

   HTTP Authentication is built on the assumption of proxies and can
   provide user-proxy authentication and proxy-proxy/server
   authentication in addition to the client-server authentication.

   When TLS is applied and a proxy is used, the client will connect to
   the proxy's address when connecting to any RTSP server.  This implies
   that for TLS, the client will authenticate the proxy server and not
   the end server.  Note that when the client checks the server





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 188]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   certificate in TLS, it MUST check the proxy's identity (URI or
   possibly other known identity) against the proxy's identity as
   presented in the proxy's Certificate message.

   The problem is that for a proxy accepted by the client, the proxy
   needs to be provided information on which grounds it should accept
   the next-hop certificate.  Both the proxy and the user may have rules
   for this, and the user should have the possibility to select the
   desired behavior.  To handle this case, the Accept-Credentials header
   (see Section 18.2) is used, where the client can request the proxy or
   proxies to relay back the chain of certificates used to authenticate
   any intermediate proxies as well as the server.  The assumption that
   the proxies are viewed as trusted gives the user a possibility to
   enforce policies on each trusted proxy of whether it should accept
   the next agent in the chain.  However, it should be noted that not
   all deployments will return the chain of certificates used to
   authenticate any intermediate proxies as well as the server.  An
   operator of such a deployment may want to hide its topology from the
   client.  It should be noted well that the client does not have any
   insight into the proxy's operation.  Even if the proxy is trusted, it
   can still return an incomplete chain of certificates.

   A proxy MUST use TLS for the next hop if the RTSP request includes an
   "rtsps" URI.  TLS MAY be applied on intermediate links (e.g., between
   client and proxy or between proxy and proxy) even if the resource and
   the end server are not required to use it.  The chain of proxies used
   by a client to reach a server and its TLS sessions MUST have
   commensurate security.  Therefore, a proxy MUST, when initiating the
   next-hop TLS connection, use the incoming TLS connections cipher-
   suite list, only modified by removing any cipher suites that the
   proxy does not support.  In case a proxy fails to establish a TLS
   connection due to cipher-suite mismatch between proxy and next-hop
   proxy or server, this is indicated using error code 472 (Failure to
   Establish Secure Connection).

19.3.1.  Accept-Credentials

   The Accept-Credentials header can be used by the client to distribute
   simple authorization policies to intermediate proxies.  The client
   includes the Accept-Credentials header to dictate how the proxy
   treats the server / next proxy certificate.  There are currently
   three methods defined:

   Any:  With "any", the proxy (or proxies) MUST accept whatever
         certificate is presented.  Of course, this is not a recommended
         option to use, but it may be useful in certain circumstances
         (such as testing).




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 189]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Proxy:  For the "proxy" method, the proxy (or proxies) MUST use its
         own policies to validate the certificate and decide whether or
         not to accept it.  This is convenient in cases where the user
         has a strong trust relation with the proxy.  Reasons why a
         strong trust relation may exist are personal/company proxy or
         the proxy has an out-of-band policy configuration mechanism.

   User: For the "user" method, the proxy (or proxies) MUST send
         credential information about the next hop to the client for
         authorization.  The client can then decide whether or not the
         proxy should accept the certificate.  See Section 19.3.2 for
         further details.

   If the Accept-Credentials header is not included in the RTSP request
   from the client, then the "Proxy" method MUST be used as default.  If
   a method other than the "Proxy" is to be used, then the Accept-
   Credentials header MUST be included in all of the RTSP requests from
   the client.  This is because it cannot be assumed that the proxy
   always keeps the TLS state or the user's previous preference between
   different RTSP messages (in particular, if the time interval between
   the messages is long).

   With the "Any" and "Proxy" methods, the proxy will apply the policy
   as defined for each method.  If the policy does not accept the
   credentials of the next hop, the proxy MUST respond with a message
   using status code 471 (Connection Credentials Not Accepted).

   An RTSP request in the direction server to client MUST NOT include
   the Accept-Credentials header.  As for the non-secured communication,
   the possibility for these requests depends on the presence of a
   client established connection.  However, if the server-to-client
   request is in relation to a session established over a TLS secured
   channel, it MUST be sent in a TLS secured connection.  That secured
   connection MUST also be the one used by the last client-to-server
   request.  If no such transport connection exists at the time when the
   server desires to send the request, the server MUST discard the
   message.

   Further policies MAY be defined and registered, but this should be
   done with caution.

19.3.2.  User-Approved TLS Procedure

   For the "User" method, each proxy MUST perform the following
   procedure for each RTSP request:

   o  Set up the TLS session to the next hop if not already present
      (i.e., run the TLS handshake, but do not send the RTSP request).



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 190]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  Extract the peer certificate chain for the TLS session.

   o  Check if a matching identity and hash of the peer certificate are
      present in the Accept-Credentials header.  If present, send the
      message to the next hop and conclude these procedures.  If not, go
      to the next step.

   o  The proxy responds to the RTSP request with a 470 or 407 response
      code.  The 407 response code MAY be used when the proxy requires
      both user and connection authorization from user or client.  In
      this message the proxy MUST include a Connection-Credentials
      header, see Section 18.13, with the next hop's identity and
      certificate.

   The client MUST upon receiving a 470 (Connection Authorization
   Required) or 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) response with
   Connection-Credentials header take the decision on whether or not to
   accept the certificate (if it cannot do so, the user SHOULD be
   consulted).  Using IP addresses in the next-hop URI and certificates
   rather than domain names makes it very difficult for a user to
   determine whether or not it should approve the next hop.  Proxies are
   RECOMMENDED to use domain names to identify themselves in URIs and in
   the certificates.  If the certificate is accepted, the client has to
   again send the RTSP request.  In that request, the client has to
   include the Accept-Credentials header including the hash over the
   DER-encoded certificate for all trusted proxies in the chain.

























Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 191]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

   C->P: SETUP rtsps://test.example.org/secret/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr="192.0.2.5:4588"/
                    "192.0.2.5:4589"
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         Accept-Credentials: User

   P->C: RTSP/2.0 470 Connection Authorization Required
         CSeq: 2
         Connection-Credentials: "rtsps://test.example.org";
         MIIDNTCCAp...

   C->P: SETUP rtsps://test.example.org/secret/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr="192.0.2.5:4588"/
                    "192.0.2.5:4589"
         Accept-Credentials: User "rtsps://test.example.org";sha-256;
         dPYD7txpoGTbAqZZQJ+vaeOkyH4=
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   P->S: SETUP rtsps://test.example.org/secret/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr="192.0.2.5:4588"/
                    "192.0.2.5:4589"
         Via: RTSP/2.0 proxy.example.org
         Accept-Credentials: User "rtsps://test.example.org";sha-256;
         dPYD7txpoGTbAqZZQJ+vaeOkyH4=
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   One implication of this process is that the connection for secured
   RTSP messages may take significantly more round-trip times for the
   first message.  A complete extra message exchange between the proxy
   connecting to the next hop and the client results because of the
   process for approval for each hop.  However, if each message contains
   the chain of proxies that the requester accepts, the remaining
   message exchange should not be delayed.  The procedure of including
   the credentials in each request rather than building state in each
   proxy avoids the need for revocation procedures.

20.  Syntax

   The RTSP syntax is described in an Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF)
   as defined in RFC 5234 [RFC5234].  It uses the basic definitions
   present in RFC 5234.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 192]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Please note that ABNF strings, e.g., "Accept", are case insensitive
   as specified in Section 2.3 of RFC 5234.

   The RTSP syntax makes use of the ISO 10646 character set in UTF-8
   encoding [RFC3629].

20.1.  Base Syntax

   RTSP header values can be folded onto multiple lines if the
   continuation line begins with a space or horizontal tab.  All linear
   whitespace, including folding, has the same semantics as SP.  A
   recipient MAY replace any linear whitespace with a single SP before
   interpreting the field-value or forwarding the message downstream.
   The SWS construct is used when linear whitespace is optional,
   generally between tokens and separators.

   To separate the header name from the rest of value, a colon is used,
   which, by the above rule, allows whitespace before, but no line
   break, and whitespace after, including a line break.  The HCOLON
   defines this construct.

   OCTET           =  %x00-FF ; any 8-bit sequence of data
   CHAR            =  %x01-7F ; any US-ASCII character (octets 1 - 127)
   UPALPHA         =  %x41-5A ; any US-ASCII uppercase letter "A".."Z"
   LOALPHA         =  %x61-7A ; any US-ASCII lowercase letter "a".."z"
   ALPHA           =  UPALPHA / LOALPHA
   DIGIT           =  %x30-39 ; any US-ASCII digit "0".."9"
   CTL             =  %x00-1F / %x7F  ; any US-ASCII control character
                      ; (octets 0 - 31) and DEL (127)
   CR              =  %x0D ; US-ASCII CR, carriage return (13)
   LF              =  %x0A  ; US-ASCII LF, linefeed (10)
   SP              =  %x20  ; US-ASCII SP, space (32)
   HT              =  %x09  ; US-ASCII HT, horizontal-tab (9)
   BACKSLASH       =  %x5C  ; US-ASCII backslash (92)
   CRLF            =  CR LF
   LWS             =  [CRLF] 1*( SP / HT ) ; Line-breaking whitespace
   SWS             =  [LWS] ; Separating whitespace
   HCOLON          =  *( SP / HT ) ":" SWS
   TEXT            =  %x20-7E / %x80-FF  ; any OCTET except CTLs
   tspecials       =  "(" / ")" / "<" / ">" / "@"
                   /  "," / ";" / ":" / BACKSLASH / DQUOTE
                   /  "/" / "[" / "]" / "?" / "="
                   /  "{" / "}" / SP / HT
   token           =  1*(%x21 / %x23-27 / %x2A-2B / %x2D-2E / %x30-39
                   /  %x41-5A / %x5E-7A / %x7C / %x7E)
                      ; 1*<any CHAR except CTLs or tspecials>
   quoted-string   =  ( DQUOTE *qdtext DQUOTE )




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 193]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   qdtext          = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / quoted-pair
                   / UTF8-NONASCII
                   ; No DQUOTE and no "\"
   quoted-pair     = "\\" / ( "\" DQUOTE )
   ctext           =  %x20-27 / %x2A-7E
                   /  %x80-FF  ; any OCTET except CTLs, "(" and ")"
   generic-param   =  token [ EQUAL gen-value ]
   gen-value       =  token / host / quoted-string

   safe            =  "$" / "-" / "_" / "." / "+"
   extra           =  "!" / "*" / "'" / "(" / ")" / ","
   rtsp-extra      =  "!" / "*" / "'" / "(" / ")"

   HEX             =  DIGIT / "A" / "B" / "C" / "D" / "E" / "F"
                   /  "a" / "b" / "c" / "d" / "e" / "f"
   LHEX            =  DIGIT /  "a" / "b" / "c" / "d" / "e" / "f"
                      ; lowercase "a-f" Hex
   reserved        =  ";" / "/" / "?" / ":" / "@" / "&" / "="

   unreserved      =  ALPHA / DIGIT / safe / extra
   rtsp-unreserved  =  ALPHA / DIGIT / safe / rtsp-extra

   base64          =  *base64-unit [base64-pad]
   base64-unit     =  4base64-char
   base64-pad      =  (2base64-char "==") / (3base64-char "=")
   base64-char     =  ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "/"
   SLASH    =  SWS "/" SWS ; slash
   EQUAL    =  SWS "=" SWS ; equal
   LPAREN   =  SWS "(" SWS ; left parenthesis
   RPAREN   =  SWS ")" SWS ; right parenthesis
   COMMA    =  SWS "," SWS ; comma
   SEMI     =  SWS ";" SWS ; semicolon
   COLON    =  SWS ":" SWS ; colon
   MINUS    =  SWS "-" SWS ; minus/dash
   LDQUOT   =  SWS DQUOTE ; open double quotation mark
   RDQUOT   =  DQUOTE SWS ; close double quotation mark
   RAQUOT   =  ">" SWS ; right angle quote
   LAQUOT   =  SWS "<" ; left angle quote

   TEXT-UTF8char    =  %x21-7E / UTF8-NONASCII
   UTF8-NONASCII    = UTF8-2 / UTF8-3 / UTF8-4
   UTF8-1           = <As defined in RFC 3629>
   UTF8-2           = <As defined in RFC 3629>
   UTF8-3           = <As defined in RFC 3629>
   UTF8-4           = <As defined in RFC 3629>
   UTF8-tail        = <As defined in RFC 3629>





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 194]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   POS-FLOAT        = 1*12DIGIT ["." 1*9DIGIT]
   FLOAT            = ["-"] POS-FLOAT

20.2.  RTSP Protocol Definition

20.2.1.  Generic Protocol Elements

   RTSP-IRI       =  schemes ":" IRI-rest
   IRI-rest       =  ihier-part [ "?" iquery ]
   ihier-part     =  "//" iauthority ipath-abempty
   RTSP-IRI-ref   =  RTSP-IRI / irelative-ref
   irelative-ref  =  irelative-part [ "?" iquery ]
   irelative-part =  "//" iauthority ipath-abempty
                     / ipath-absolute
                     / ipath-noscheme
                     / ipath-empty

   iauthority     =  < As defined in RFC 3987>
   ipath          =  ipath-abempty   ; begins with "/" or is empty
                     / ipath-absolute  ; begins with "/" but not "//"
                     / ipath-noscheme  ; begins with a non-colon segment
                     / ipath-rootless  ; begins with a segment
                     / ipath-empty     ; zero characters

   ipath-abempty   =  *( "/" isegment )
   ipath-absolute  =  "/" [ isegment-nz *( "/" isegment ) ]
   ipath-noscheme  =  isegment-nz-nc *( "/" isegment )
   ipath-rootless  =  isegment-nz *( "/" isegment )
   ipath-empty     =  0<ipchar>

   isegment        =  *ipchar [";" *ipchar]
   isegment-nz     =  1*ipchar [";" *ipchar]
                      / ";" *ipchar
   isegment-nz-nc  =  (1*ipchar-nc [";" *ipchar-nc])
                      / ";" *ipchar-nc
                      ; non-zero-length segment without any colon ":"
                      ; No parameter (; delimited) inside path.

   ipchar         =  iunreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"
   ipchar-nc      =  iunreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / "@"
                     ; sub-delims is different from RFC 3987
                     ; not including ";"

   iquery         =  < As defined in RFC 3987>
   iunreserved    =  < As defined in RFC 3987>
   pct-encoded    =  < As defined in RFC 3987>





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 195]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTSP-URI       =  schemes ":" URI-rest
   RTSP-REQ-URI   =  schemes ":" URI-req-rest
   RTSP-URI-Ref   =  RTSP-URI / RTSP-Relative
   RTSP-REQ-Ref   =  RTSP-REQ-URI / RTSP-REQ-Rel
   schemes        =  "rtsp" / "rtsps" / scheme
   scheme         =  < As defined in RFC 3986>
   URI-rest       =  hier-part [ "?" query ]
   URI-req-rest   =  hier-part [ "?" query ]
                     ; Note fragment part not allowed in requests
   hier-part      =  "//" authority path-abempty

   RTSP-Relative  =  relative-part [ "?" query ]
   RTSP-REQ-Rel   =  relative-part [ "?" query ]
   relative-part  =  "//" authority path-abempty
                     / path-absolute
                     / path-noscheme
                     / path-empty

   authority      =  < As defined in RFC 3986>
   query          =  < As defined in RFC 3986>

   path           =  path-abempty    ; begins with "/" or is empty
                     / path-absolute ; begins with "/" but not "//"
                     / path-noscheme ; begins with a non-colon segment
                     / path-rootless ; begins with a segment
                     / path-empty    ; zero characters

   path-abempty   =  *( "/" segment )
   path-absolute  =  "/" [ segment-nz *( "/" segment ) ]
   path-noscheme  =  segment-nz-nc *( "/" segment )
   path-rootless  =  segment-nz *( "/" segment )
   path-empty     =  0<pchar>

   segment        =  *pchar [";" *pchar]
   segment-nz     =  ( 1*pchar [";" *pchar]) / (";" *pchar)
   segment-nz-nc  =  ( 1*pchar-nc [";" *pchar-nc]) / (";" *pchar-nc)
                     ; non-zero-length segment without any colon ":"
                     ; No parameter (; delimited) inside path.

   pchar          =  unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"
   pchar-nc       =  unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / "@"

   sub-delims     =  "!" / "$" / "&" / "'" / "(" / ")"
                     / "*" / "+" / "," / "="
                     ; sub-delims is different from RFC 3986/3987
                     ; not including ";"





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 196]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   smpte-range        =  smpte-type [EQUAL smpte-range-spec]
                         ; See section 4.4
   smpte-range-spec   =  ( smpte-time "-" [ smpte-time ] )
                      /  ( "-" smpte-time )
   smpte-type         =  "smpte" / "smpte-30-drop"
                      /  "smpte-25" / smpte-type-extension
                      ; other timecodes may be added
   smpte-type-extension  =  "smpte" token
   smpte-time         =  1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT
                         [ ":" 1*2DIGIT [ "." 1*2DIGIT ] ]

   npt-range        =  "npt" [EQUAL npt-range-spec]
   npt-range-spec   =  ( npt-time "-" [ npt-time ] ) / ( "-" npt-time )
   npt-time         =  "now" / npt-sec / npt-hhmmss / npt-hhmmss-comp
   npt-sec          =  1*19DIGIT [ "." 1*9DIGIT ]
   npt-hhmmss       =  npt-hh ":" npt-mm ":" npt-ss [ "." 1*9DIGIT ]
   npt-hh           =  2*19DIGIT   ; any positive number
   npt-mm           =  2*2DIGIT  ; 0-59
   npt-ss           =  2*2DIGIT  ; 0-59
   npt-hhmmss-comp  =  npt-hh-comp ":" npt-mm-comp ":" npt-ss-comp
                       [ "." 1*9DIGIT ] ; Compatibility format
   npt-hh-comp      =  1*19DIGIT   ; any positive number
   npt-mm-comp      =  1*2DIGIT  ; 0-59
   npt-ss-comp      =  1*2DIGIT  ; 0-59

   utc-range        =  "clock" [EQUAL utc-range-spec]
   utc-range-spec   =  ( utc-time "-" [ utc-time ] ) / ( "-" utc-time )
   utc-time         =  utc-date "T" utc-clock "Z"
   utc-date         =  8DIGIT
   utc-clock        =  6DIGIT [ "." 1*9DIGIT ]

   feature-tag       =  token

   session-id        =  1*256( ALPHA / DIGIT / safe )

   extension-header  =  header-name HCOLON header-value
   header-name       =  token
   header-value      =  *(TEXT-UTF8char / LWS)













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 197]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


20.2.2.  Message Syntax

   RTSP-message  = Request / Response  ; RTSP/2.0 messages

   Request       = Request-Line
                   *((general-header
                   /  request-header
                   /  message-body-header) CRLF)
                   CRLF
                   [ message-body-data ]

   Response     = Status-Line
                  *((general-header
                  /  response-header
                  /  message-body-header) CRLF)
                  CRLF
                  [ message-body-data ]

   Request-Line = Method SP Request-URI SP RTSP-Version CRLF

   Status-Line  = RTSP-Version SP Status-Code SP Reason-Phrase CRLF

   Method  =  "DESCRIBE"
           /  "GET_PARAMETER"
           /  "OPTIONS"
           /  "PAUSE"
           /  "PLAY"
           /  "PLAY_NOTIFY"
           /  "REDIRECT"
           /  "SETUP"
           /  "SET_PARAMETER"
           /  "TEARDOWN"
           /  extension-method

   extension-method  =  token

   Request-URI  =  "*" / RTSP-REQ-URI
   RTSP-Version =  "RTSP/" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT

   message-body-data = 1*OCTET

   Status-Code  =  "100"  ; Continue
                /  "200"  ; OK
                /  "301"  ; Moved Permanently
                /  "302"  ; Found
                /  "303"  ; See Other
                /  "304"  ; Not Modified
                /  "305"  ; Use Proxy



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 198]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


                /  "400"  ; Bad Request
                /  "401"  ; Unauthorized
                /  "402"  ; Payment Required
                /  "403"  ; Forbidden
                /  "404"  ; Not Found
                /  "405"  ; Method Not Allowed
                /  "406"  ; Not Acceptable
                /  "407"  ; Proxy Authentication Required
                /  "408"  ; Request Timeout
                /  "410"  ; Gone
                /  "412"  ; Precondition Failed
                /  "413"  ; Request Message Body Too Large
                /  "414"  ; Request-URI Too Long
                /  "415"  ; Unsupported Media Type
                /  "451"  ; Parameter Not Understood
                /  "452"  ; reserved
                /  "453"  ; Not Enough Bandwidth
                /  "454"  ; Session Not Found
                /  "455"  ; Method Not Valid In This State
                /  "456"  ; Header Field Not Valid for Resource
                /  "457"  ; Invalid Range
                /  "458"  ; Parameter Is Read-Only
                /  "459"  ; Aggregate Operation Not Allowed
                /  "460"  ; Only Aggregate Operation Allowed
                /  "461"  ; Unsupported Transport
                /  "462"  ; Destination Unreachable
                /  "463"  ; Destination Prohibited
                /  "464"  ; Data Transport Not Ready Yet
                /  "465"  ; Notification Reason Unknown
                /  "466"  ; Key Management Error
                /  "470"  ; Connection Authorization Required
                /  "471"  ; Connection Credentials Not Accepted
                /  "472"  ; Failure to Establish Secure Connection
                /  "500"  ; Internal Server Error
                /  "501"  ; Not Implemented
                /  "502"  ; Bad Gateway
                /  "503"  ; Service Unavailable
                /  "504"  ; Gateway Timeout
                /  "505"  ; RTSP Version Not Supported
                /  "551"  ; Option Not Supported
                /  "553"  ; Proxy Unavailable
                /  extension-code

   extension-code  =  3DIGIT

   Reason-Phrase   =  1*(TEXT-UTF8char / HT / SP)





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 199]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   rtsp-header     = general-header
                   / request-header
                   / response-header
                   / message-body-header

   general-header  =  Accept-Ranges
                   /  Cache-Control
                   /  Connection
                   /  CSeq
                   /  Date
                   /  Media-Properties
                   /  Media-Range
                   /  Pipelined-Requests
                   /  Proxy-Supported
                   /  Range
                   /  RTP-Info
                   /  Scale
                   /  Seek-Style
                   /  Server
                   /  Session
                   /  Speed
                   /  Supported
                   /  Timestamp
                   /  Transport
                   /  User-Agent
                   /  Via
                   /  extension-header

   request-header  =  Accept
                   /  Accept-Credentials
                   /  Accept-Encoding
                   /  Accept-Language
                   /  Authorization
                   /  Bandwidth
                   /  Blocksize
                   /  From
                   /  If-Match
                   /  If-Modified-Since
                   /  If-None-Match
                   /  Notify-Reason
                   /  Proxy-Authorization
                   /  Proxy-Require
                   /  Referrer
                   /  Request-Status
                   /  Require
                   /  Terminate-Reason
                   /  extension-header




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 200]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   response-header  =  Authentication-Info
                    /  Connection-Credentials
                    /  Location
                    /  MTag
                    /  Proxy-Authenticate
                    /  Proxy-Authentication-Info
                    /  Public
                    /  Retry-After
                    /  Unsupported
                    /  WWW-Authenticate
                    /  extension-header

   message-body-header    =  Allow
                    /  Content-Base
                    /  Content-Encoding
                    /  Content-Language
                    /  Content-Length
                    /  Content-Location
                    /  Content-Type
                    /  Expires
                    /  Last-Modified
                    /  extension-header

20.2.3.  Header Syntax

   Accept            =  "Accept" HCOLON
                        [ accept-range *(COMMA accept-range) ]
   accept-range      =  media-type-range [SEMI accept-params]
   media-type-range  =  ( "*/*"
                        / ( m-type SLASH "*" )
                        / ( m-type SLASH m-subtype )
                       ) *( SEMI m-parameter )
   accept-params     =  "q" EQUAL qvalue *(SEMI generic-param )
   qvalue            =  ( "0" [ "." *3DIGIT ] )
                     /  ( "1" [ "." *3("0") ] )
   Accept-Credentials =  "Accept-Credentials" HCOLON cred-decision
   cred-decision     =  ("User" [LWS cred-info])
                     /  "Proxy"
                     /  "Any"
                     /  (token [LWS 1*header-value])
                                     ; For future extensions
   cred-info         =  cred-info-data *(COMMA cred-info-data)

   cred-info-data    =  DQUOTE RTSP-REQ-URI DQUOTE SEMI hash-alg
                        SEMI base64
   hash-alg          =  "sha-256" / extension-alg
   extension-alg     =  token
   Accept-Encoding   =  "Accept-Encoding" HCOLON



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 201]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


                        [ encoding *(COMMA encoding) ]
   encoding          =  codings [SEMI accept-params]
   codings           =  content-coding / "*"
   content-coding    =  "identity" / token
   Accept-Language   =  "Accept-Language" HCOLON
                        language *(COMMA language)
   language          =  language-range [SEMI accept-params]
   language-range    =  language-tag / "*"
   language-tag      =  primary-tag *( "-" subtag )
   primary-tag       =  1*8ALPHA
   subtag            =  1*8ALPHA
   Accept-Ranges     =  "Accept-Ranges" HCOLON acceptable-ranges
   acceptable-ranges =  (range-unit *(COMMA range-unit))
   range-unit        =  "npt" / "smpte" / "smpte-30-drop" / "smpte-25"
                        / "clock" / extension-format
   extension-format  =  token
   Allow             =  "Allow" HCOLON Method *(COMMA Method)
   Authentication-Info = "Authentication-Info" HCOLON auth-param-list
   auth-param-list   =  <As the Authentication-Info element in RFC 7615>
   Authorization     =  "Authorization" HCOLON credentials
   credentials       =  <As defined by RFC 7235>

   Bandwidth         =  "Bandwidth" HCOLON 1*19DIGIT

   Blocksize         =  "Blocksize" HCOLON 1*9DIGIT

   Cache-Control     =  "Cache-Control" HCOLON cache-directive
                        *(COMMA cache-directive)
   cache-directive   =  cache-rqst-directive
                     /  cache-rspns-directive

   cache-rqst-directive =  "no-cache"
                        /  "max-stale" [EQUAL delta-seconds]
                        /  "min-fresh" EQUAL delta-seconds
                        /  "only-if-cached"
                        /  cache-extension

   cache-rspns-directive =  "public"
                            /  "private"
                            /  "no-cache"
                            /  "no-transform"
                            /  "must-revalidate"
                            /  "proxy-revalidate"
                            /  "max-age" EQUAL delta-seconds
                            /  cache-extension

   cache-extension   =  token [EQUAL (token / quoted-string)]
   delta-seconds     =  1*19DIGIT



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 202]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Connection         =  "Connection" HCOLON connection-token
                         *(COMMA connection-token)
   connection-token   =  "close" / token

   Connection-Credentials = "Connection-Credentials" HCOLON cred-chain
   cred-chain         =  DQUOTE RTSP-REQ-URI DQUOTE SEMI base64

   Content-Base       =  "Content-Base" HCOLON RTSP-URI
   Content-Encoding   =  "Content-Encoding" HCOLON
                         content-coding *(COMMA content-coding)
   Content-Language   =  "Content-Language" HCOLON
                         language-tag *(COMMA language-tag)
   Content-Length     =  "Content-Length" HCOLON 1*19DIGIT
   Content-Location   =  "Content-Location" HCOLON RTSP-REQ-Ref
   Content-Type       =  "Content-Type" HCOLON media-type
   media-type         =  m-type SLASH m-subtype *(SEMI m-parameter)
   m-type             =  discrete-type / composite-type
   discrete-type      =  "text" / "image" / "audio" / "video"
                      /  "application" / extension-token
   composite-type   =  "message" / "multipart" / extension-token
   extension-token  =  ietf-token / x-token
   ietf-token       =  token
   x-token          =  "x-" token
   m-subtype        =  extension-token / iana-token
   iana-token       =  token
   m-parameter      =  m-attribute EQUAL m-value
   m-attribute      =  token
   m-value          =  token / quoted-string

   CSeq           =  "CSeq" HCOLON cseq-nr
   cseq-nr        =  1*9DIGIT
   Date           =  "Date" HCOLON RTSP-date
   RTSP-date      =  date-time ;
   date-time      =  <As defined in RFC 5322>
   Expires        =  "Expires" HCOLON RTSP-date
   From           =  "From" HCOLON from-spec
   from-spec      =  ( name-addr / addr-spec ) *( SEMI from-param )
   name-addr      =  [ display-name ] LAQUOT addr-spec RAQUOT
   addr-spec      =  RTSP-REQ-URI / absolute-URI
   absolute-URI   =  < As defined in RFC 3986>
   display-name   =  *(token LWS) / quoted-string
   from-param     =  tag-param / generic-param
   tag-param      =  "tag" EQUAL token
   If-Match       =  "If-Match" HCOLON ("*" / message-tag-list)
   message-tag-list =  message-tag *(COMMA message-tag)
   message-tag      =  [ weak ] opaque-tag
   weak             =  "W/"
   opaque-tag       =  quoted-string



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 203]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   If-Modified-Since  =  "If-Modified-Since" HCOLON RTSP-date
   If-None-Match    =  "If-None-Match" HCOLON ("*" / message-tag-list)
   Last-Modified    =  "Last-Modified" HCOLON RTSP-date
   Location         =  "Location" HCOLON RTSP-REQ-URI
   Media-Properties = "Media-Properties" HCOLON [media-prop-list]
   media-prop-list  = media-prop-value *(COMMA media-prop-value)
   media-prop-value = ("Random-Access" [EQUAL POS-FLOAT])
                    / "Beginning-Only"
                    / "No-Seeking"
                    / "Immutable"
                    / "Dynamic"
                    / "Time-Progressing"
                    / "Unlimited"
                    / ("Time-Limited" EQUAL utc-time)
                    / ("Time-Duration" EQUAL POS-FLOAT)
                    / ("Scales" EQUAL scale-value-list)
                    / media-prop-ext
   media-prop-ext   = token [EQUAL (1*rtsp-unreserved / quoted-string)]
   scale-value-list = DQUOTE scale-entry *(COMMA scale-entry) DQUOTE
   scale-entry      = scale-value / (scale-value COLON scale-value)
   scale-value      = FLOAT
   Media-Range      = "Media-Range" HCOLON [ranges-list]
   ranges-list      =  ranges-spec *(COMMA ranges-spec)
   MTag             =  "MTag" HCOLON message-tag
   Notify-Reason    = "Notify-Reason" HCOLON Notify-Reas-val
   Notify-Reas-val  = "end-of-stream"
                    / "media-properties-update"
                    / "scale-change"
                    / Notify-Reason-extension
   Notify-Reason-extension  = token
   Pipelined-Requests = "Pipelined-Requests" HCOLON startup-id
   startup-id  = 1*8DIGIT

   Proxy-Authenticate =  "Proxy-Authenticate" HCOLON challenge-list
   challenge-list     = <As defined by the WWW-Authenticate in RFC 7235>
   Proxy-Authentication-Info = "Proxy-Authentication-Info" HCOLON
                         auth-param-list
   Proxy-Authorization = "Proxy-Authorization" HCOLON credentials
   Proxy-Require      =  "Proxy-Require" HCOLON feature-tag-list
   feature-tag-list   =  feature-tag *(COMMA feature-tag)
   Proxy-Supported    =  "Proxy-Supported" HCOLON [feature-tag-list]

   Public             =  "Public" HCOLON Method *(COMMA Method)

   Range              =  "Range" HCOLON ranges-spec

   ranges-spec        =  npt-range / utc-range / smpte-range
                      /  range-ext



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 204]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   range-ext          =  extension-format [EQUAL range-value]
   range-value        =  1*(rtsp-unreserved / quoted-string / ":" )

   Referrer           =  "Referrer" HCOLON (absolute-URI / RTSP-URI-Ref)
   Request-Status     =  "Request-Status" HCOLON req-status-info
   req-status-info    =  cseq-info LWS status-info LWS reason-info
   cseq-info          =  "cseq" EQUAL cseq-nr
   status-info        =  "status" EQUAL Status-Code
   reason-info        =  "reason" EQUAL DQUOTE Reason-Phrase DQUOTE
   Require            =  "Require" HCOLON feature-tag-list









































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 205]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTP-Info         =  "RTP-Info" HCOLON [rtsp-info-spec
                       *(COMMA rtsp-info-spec)]
   rtsp-info-spec   =  stream-url 1*ssrc-parameter
   stream-url       =  "url" EQUAL DQUOTE RTSP-REQ-Ref DQUOTE
   ssrc-parameter   =  LWS "ssrc" EQUAL ssrc HCOLON
                       ri-parameter *(SEMI ri-parameter)
   ri-parameter     =  ("seq" EQUAL 1*5DIGIT)
                    /  ("rtptime" EQUAL 1*10DIGIT)
                    /  generic-param

   Retry-After      =  "Retry-After" HCOLON (RTSP-date / delta-seconds)
   Scale            =  "Scale" HCOLON scale-value
   Seek-Style       =  "Seek-Style" HCOLON Seek-S-values
   Seek-S-values    =  "RAP"
                    /  "CoRAP"
                    /  "First-Prior"
                    /  "Next"
                    /  Seek-S-value-ext
   Seek-S-value-ext =  token

   Server           =  "Server" HCOLON ( product / comment )
                       *(LWS (product / comment))
   product          =  token [SLASH product-version]
   product-version  =  token
   comment          =  LPAREN *( ctext / quoted-pair) RPAREN

   Session          =  "Session" HCOLON session-id
                       [ SEMI "timeout" EQUAL delta-seconds ]

   Speed            =  "Speed" HCOLON lower-bound MINUS upper-bound
   lower-bound      =  POS-FLOAT
   upper-bound      =  POS-FLOAT

   Supported        =  "Supported" HCOLON [feature-tag-list]

















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 206]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Terminate-Reason      =  "Terminate-Reason" HCOLON TR-Info
   TR-Info              =  TR-Reason *(SEMI TR-Parameter)
   TR-Reason            =  "Session-Timeout"
                        /  "Server-Admin"
                        /  "Internal-Error"
                        /  token
   TR-Parameter         =  TR-time / TR-user-msg / generic-param
   TR-time              =  "time" EQUAL utc-time
   TR-user-msg          =  "user-msg" EQUAL quoted-string

   Timestamp        =  "Timestamp" HCOLON timestamp-value [LWS delay]
   timestamp-value  =  *19DIGIT [ "." *9DIGIT ]
   delay            =  *9DIGIT [ "." *9DIGIT ]

   Transport        =  "Transport" HCOLON transport-spec
                       *(COMMA transport-spec)
   transport-spec   =  transport-id *trns-parameter
   transport-id     =  trans-id-rtp / other-trans
   trans-id-rtp     =  "RTP/" profile ["/" lower-transport]
                       ; no LWS is allowed inside transport-id
   other-trans      =  token *("/" token)






























Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 207]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   profile           = "AVP" / "SAVP" / "AVPF" / "SAVPF" / token
   lower-transport   = "TCP" / "UDP" / token
   trns-parameter    = (SEMI ( "unicast" / "multicast" ))
                     / (SEMI "interleaved" EQUAL channel ["-" channel])
                     / (SEMI "ttl" EQUAL ttl)
                     / (SEMI "layers" EQUAL 1*DIGIT)
                     / (SEMI "ssrc" EQUAL ssrc *(SLASH ssrc))
                     / (SEMI "mode" EQUAL mode-spec)
                     / (SEMI "dest_addr" EQUAL addr-list)
                     / (SEMI "src_addr" EQUAL addr-list)
                     / (SEMI "setup" EQUAL contrans-setup)
                     / (SEMI "connection" EQUAL contrans-con)
                     / (SEMI "RTCP-mux")
                     / (SEMI "MIKEY" EQUAL MIKEY-Value)
                     / (SEMI trn-param-ext)
   contrans-setup    = "active" / "passive" / "actpass"
   contrans-con      = "new" / "existing"
   trn-param-ext     = par-name [EQUAL trn-par-value]
   par-name          = token
   trn-par-value     = *(rtsp-unreserved / quoted-string)
   ttl               = 1*3DIGIT ; 0 to 255
   ssrc              = 8HEX
   channel           = 1*3DIGIT ; 0 to 255
   MIKEY-Value       = base64
   mode-spec         = ( DQUOTE mode *(COMMA mode) DQUOTE )
   mode              = "PLAY" / token
   addr-list         = quoted-addr *(SLASH quoted-addr)
   quoted-addr       = DQUOTE (host-port / extension-addr) DQUOTE
   host-port         = ( host [":" port] )
                     / ( ":" port )
   extension-addr    = 1*qdtext
   host              = < As defined in RFC 3986>
   port              = < As defined in RFC 3986>


















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 208]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Unsupported     = "Unsupported" HCOLON feature-tag-list
   User-Agent      = "User-Agent" HCOLON ( product / comment )
                     *(LWS (product / comment))
   Via             = "Via" HCOLON via-parm *(COMMA via-parm)
   via-parm        = sent-protocol LWS sent-by *( SEMI via-params )
   via-params      = via-ttl / via-maddr
                   / via-received / via-extension
   via-ttl         = "ttl" EQUAL ttl
   via-maddr       = "maddr" EQUAL host
   via-received    = "received" EQUAL (IPv4address / IPv6address)
   IPv4address     = < As defined in RFC 3986>
   IPv6address     = < As defined in RFC 3986>
   via-extension   = generic-param
   sent-protocol   = protocol-name SLASH protocol-version
                     SLASH transport-prot
   protocol-name   = "RTSP" / token
   protocol-version = token
   transport-prot  = "UDP" / "TCP" / "TLS" / other-transport
   other-transport = token
   sent-by         = host [ COLON port ]

   WWW-Authenticate = "WWW-Authenticate" HCOLON challenge-list

20.3.  SDP Extension Syntax

   This section defines in ABNF the SDP extensions defined for RTSP.
   See Appendix D for the definition of the extensions in text.

   control-attribute   =  "a=control:" *SP RTSP-REQ-Ref CRLF

   a-range-def         =  "a=range:" ranges-spec CRLF

   a-mtag-def          =  "a=mtag:" message-tag CRLF

21.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations and threats around RTSP and its usage can
   be divided into considerations around the signaling protocol itself
   and the issues related to the media-stream delivery.  However, when
   it comes to mitigation of security threats, a threat depending on the
   media-stream delivery may in fact be mitigated by a mechanism in the
   signaling protocol.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 209]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   There are several chapters and an appendix in this document that
   define security solutions for the protocol.  These sections will be
   referenced when discussing the threats below.  However, the reader
   should take special notice of the Security Framework (Section 19) and
   the specification of how to use SRTP and its key-management
   (Appendix C.1.4) to achieve certain aspects of the media security.

21.1.  Signaling Protocol Threats

   This section focuses on issues related to the signaling protocol.
   Because of the similarity in syntax and usage between RTSP servers
   and HTTP servers, the security considerations outlined in [RFC7230],
   [RFC7231], [RFC7232], [RFC7233], [RFC7234], and [RFC7235] apply as
   well.

   Specifically, please note the following:

   Abuse of Server Log Information:  A server is in the position to save
         personal data about a user's requests that might identify their
         media consumption patterns or subjects of interest.  This
         information is clearly confidential in nature, and its handling
         can be constrained by law in certain countries.  Log
         information needs to be securely stored and appropriate
         guidelines followed for its analysis.  See Section 9.8 of
         [RFC7230] for additional guidelines.

   Transfer of Sensitive Information:  There is no reason to believe
         that information transferred in RTSP message, such as the URI
         and the content of headers, especially the Server, Via,
         Referrer, and From headers, may be any less sensitive than when
         used in HTTP.  Therefore, all of the precautions regarding the
         protection of data privacy and user privacy apply to
         implementers of RTSP clients, servers, and proxies.  See
         Sections 9.3-9.6 of [RFC7231] for further details.

         The RTSP methods defined in this document are primarily used to
         establish and control the delivery of the media data
         represented by the URI; thus, the RTSP message bodies are
         generally less sensitive than the ones in HTTP.  Where HTTP
         bodies could contain, for example, your medical records, in
         RTSP, the sensitive video of your medical operation would be in
         the media stream over the media-transport protocol, not in the
         RTSP message.  Still, one has to take note of what potential
         sensitive information is included in RTSP.  The protection of
         the media data is separate, can be applied directly between
         client and server, and is dependent on the media-transport
         protocol in use.  See Section 21.2 for further discussion.
         This possibility for separation of security between media-



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 210]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


         resource content and the signaling protocol mitigates the risk
         of exposing the media content when using hop-by-hop security
         for RTSP signaling using proxies (Section 19.3).

   Attacks Based On File and Path Names:  Though RTSP URIs are opaque
         handles that do not necessarily have file-system semantics, it
         is anticipated that many implementations will translate
         portions of the Request-URIs directly to file-system calls.  In
         such cases, file systems SHOULD follow the precautions outlined
         in Section 9.1 of [RFC7231], such as checking for ".." in path
         components.

   Personal Information:  RTSP clients are often privy to the same
         information that HTTP clients are (username, location, etc.)
         and thus should be equally sensitive.  See Section 9.8 of
         [RFC7230], Sections 9.3-9.7 of [RFC7231], and Section 8 of
         [RFC7234] for further recommendations.

   Privacy Issues Connected to Accept Headers:  Since similar usages of
         the "Accept" headers exist in RTSP as in HTTP, the same caveats
         outlined in Section 9.4 of [RFC7231] with regard to their use
         should be followed.

   Establishing Authority:  RTSP shares with HTTP the question of how a
         client communicates with the authoritative source for media
         streams (Section 9.1 of [RFC7230]).  The used DNS servers, the
         security of the communication, and any possibility of a man in
         the middle, and the trust in any RTSP proxies all affect the
         possibility that a client has received a non-authoritative
         response to a request.  Ensuring that a client receives an
         authoritative response is challenging, although using the
         secure communication for RTSP signaling (rtsps) simplifies it
         significantly as the server can provide a hostname identity
         assertion in the TLS handshake.

   Location Headers and Spoofing:  If a single server supports multiple
         organizations that do not trust each another, then it MUST
         check the values of the Content-Location header fields in
         responses that are generated under control of said
         organizations to make sure that they do not attempt to
         invalidate resources over which they have no authority (see
         Section 15.4 of [RFC2616]).

   In addition to the recommendations in the current HTTP specifications
   ([RFC7230], [RFC7231], [RFC7232], [RFC7233], [RFC7234], and [RFC7235]
   as of this writing) and also those of the previous relevant RFCs
   [RFC2068] [RFC2616], future HTTP specifications may provide
   additional guidance on security issues.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 211]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The following are added considerations for RTSP implementations.

   Session Hijacking:  Since there is no or little relation between a
         transport-layer connection and an RTSP session, it is possible
         for a malicious client to issue requests with random session
         identifiers that could affect other clients of an unsuspecting
         server.  To mitigate this, the server SHALL use a large, random
         and non-sequential session identifier to minimize the
         possibility of this kind of attack.  However, unless the RTSP
         signaling is always confidentiality protected, e.g., using TLS,
         an on-path attacker will be able to hijack a session.  Another
         choice for preventing session hijacking is to use client
         authentication and only allow the authenticated client creating
         the session to access that session.

   Authentication:  Servers SHOULD implement both basic and Digest
         [RFC2617] authentication.  In environments requiring tighter
         security for the control messages, the transport-layer
         mechanism TLS [RFC5246] SHOULD be used.

   Suspicious Behavior:  Upon detecting instances of behavior that is
         deemed a security risk, RTSP servers SHOULD return error code
         403 (Forbidden).  RTSP servers SHOULD also be aware of attempts
         to probe the server for weaknesses and entry points and MAY
         arbitrarily disconnect and ignore further requests from clients
         that are deemed to be in violation of local security policy.

   TLS through Proxies:  If one uses the possibility to connect TLS in
         multiple legs (Section 19.3), one really needs to be aware of
         the trust model.  This procedure requires trust in all proxies
         part of the path to the server.  The proxies one connects
         through are identified, assuming the proxies so far connected
         through are well behaved and fulfilling the trust.  The
         accepted proxies are men in the middle and have access to all
         that goes on over the TLS connection.  Thus, it is important to
         consider if that trust model is acceptable in the actual
         application.  Further discussion of the actual trust model is
         in Section 19.3.  It is important to note what difference in
         security properties, if any, may exist with the used media-
         transport protocol and its security mechanism.  Using SRTP and
         the MIKEY-based key-establishment defined in Appendix C.1.4.1
         enables media key-establishment to be done end-to-end without
         revealing the keys to the proxies.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 212]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Resource Exhaustion:  As RTSP is a stateful protocol and establishes
         resource usage on the server, there is a clear possibility to
         attack the server by trying to overbook these resources to
         perform a DoS attack.  This attack can be both against ongoing
         sessions and to prevent others from establishing sessions.
         RTSP agents will need to have mechanisms to prevent single
         peers from consuming extensive amounts of resources.  The
         methods for guarding against this are varied and depend on the
         agent's role and capabilities and policies.  Each
         implementation has to carefully consider its methods and
         policies to mitigate this threat.  There are recommendations
         regarding the handling of connections in Section 10.7.

   The above threats and considerations have resulted in a set of
   security functions and mechanisms built into or used by the protocol.
   The signaling protocol relies on two security features defined in the
   Security Framework (Section 19): namely client authentication using
   HTTP authentication and TLS-based transport protection of the
   signaling messages.  Both of these mechanisms are required to be
   implemented by any RTSP agent.

   A number of different security mitigations have been designed into
   the protocol and will be instantiated if the specification is
   implemented as written, for example, by ensuring sufficient amounts
   of entropy in the randomly generated session identifiers when not
   using client authentication to minimize the risk of session
   hijacking.  When client authentication is used, protection against
   hijacking will be greatly improved by scoping the accessible sessions
   to the one this client identity has created.  Some of the above
   threats are such that the implementation of the RTSP functionality
   itself needs to consider which policy and strategy it uses to
   mitigate them.

21.2.  Media Stream Delivery Threats

   The fact that RTSP establishes and controls a media-stream delivery
   results in a set of security issues related to the media streams.
   This section will attempt to analyze general threats; however, the
   choice of media-stream transport protocol, such as RTP, will result
   in some differences in threats and what mechanisms exist to mitigate
   them.  Thus, it becomes important that each specification of a new
   media-stream transport and delivery protocol usable by RTSP requires
   its own security analysis.  This section includes one for RTP.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 213]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The set of general threats from or by the media-stream delivery
   itself are:

   Concentrated Denial-of-Service Attack:  The protocol offers the
      opportunity for a remote-controlled DoS attack, where the media
      stream is the hammer in that DoS attack.  See Section 21.2.1.

   Media Confidentiality:  The media delivery may contain content of any
      type, and it is not possible, in general, to determine how
      sensitive this content is from a confidentiality point.  Thus, it
      is a strong requirement that any media delivery protocol supply a
      method for providing confidentiality of the actual media content.
      In addition to the media-level confidentiality, it becomes
      critical that no resource identifiers used in the signaling be
      exposed to an attacker as they may have human-understandable names
      or may be available to the attacker, allowing it to determine the
      content the user received.  Thus, the signaling protocol must also
      provide confidentiality protection of any information related to
      the media resource.

   Media Integrity and Authentication:  There are several reasons why an
      attacker will be interested in substituting the media stream sent
      out from the RTSP server with one of the attacker's creation or
      selection, such as discrediting the target and misinformation
      about the target.  Therefore, it is important that the media
      protocol provide mechanisms to verify the source authentication
      and integrity and to prevent replay attacks on the media stream.

   Scope of Multicast:  If RTSP is used to control the transmission of
      media onto a multicast network, the scope of the delivery must be
      considered.  RTSP supports the TTL Transport header parameter to
      indicate this scope for IPv4.  IPv6 has a different mechanism for
      the scope boundary.  However, such scope control has risks, as it
      may be set too large and distribute media beyond the intended
      scope.

   Below (Section 21.2.2) a protocol-specific analysis of security
   considerations for RTP-based media transport is included.  In that
   section, the requirements on implementing security functions for RTSP
   agents supporting media delivery over RTP are made clear.











Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 214]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


21.2.1.  Remote DoS Attack

   The attacker may initiate traffic flows to one or more IP addresses
   by specifying them as the destination in SETUP requests.  While the
   attacker's IP address may be known in this case, this is not always
   useful in the prevention of more attacks or ascertaining the
   attacker's identity.  Thus, an RTSP server MUST only allow client-
   specified destinations for RTSP-initiated traffic flows if the server
   has ensured that the specified destination address accepts receiving
   media through different security mechanisms.  Security mechanisms
   that are acceptable in order of increasing generality are:

   o  Verification of the client's identity against a database of known
      users using RTSP authentication mechanisms (preferably Digest
      authentication or stronger)

   o  A list of addresses that have consented to be media destinations,
      especially considering user identity

   o  Verification based on media path

   The server SHOULD NOT allow the destination field to be set unless a
   mechanism exists in the system to authorize the request originator to
   direct streams to the recipient.  It is preferred that this
   authorization be performed by the media recipient (destination)
   itself and the credentials be passed along to the server.  However,
   in certain cases, such as when the recipient address is a multicast
   group or when the recipient is unable to communicate with the server
   in an out-of-band manner, this may not be possible.  In these cases,
   the server may choose another method such as a server-resident
   authorization list to ensure that the request originator has the
   proper credentials to request stream delivery to the recipient.

   One solution that performs the necessary verification of acceptance
   of media suitable for unicast-based delivery is the NAT traversal
   method based on Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)
   [RFC5245] described in [RFC7825].  This mechanism uses random
   passwords and a username so that the probability of unintended
   indication as a valid media destination is very low.  In addition,
   the server includes in its Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
   [RFC5389] requests a cookie (consisting of random material) that the
   destination echoes back; thus, the solution also safeguards against
   having an off-path attacker being able to spoof the STUN checks.
   This leaves this solution vulnerable only to on-path attackers that
   can see the STUN requests go to the target of attack and thus forge a
   response.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 215]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   For delivery to multicast addresses, there is a need for another
   solution that is not specified in this memo.

21.2.2.  RTP Security Analysis

   RTP is a commonly used media-transport protocol and has been the most
   common choice for RTSP 1.0 implementations.  The core RTP protocol
   has been in use for a long time, and it has well-known security
   properties and the RTP security consideration (Section 9 of
   [RFC3550]) needs to be reviewed.  In perspective of the usage of RTP
   in the context of RTSP, the following properties should be noted:

   Stream Additions:  RTP has support for multiple simultaneous media
      streams in each RTP session.  As some use cases require support
      for non-synchronized adding and removal of media streams and their
      identifiers, an attacker can easily insert additional media
      streams into a session context that, according to protocol design,
      is intended to be played out.  Another threat vector is one of DoS
      by exhausting the resources of the RTP session receiver, for
      example, by using a large number of SSRC identifiers
      simultaneously.  The strong mitigation of this is to ensure that
      one cryptographically authenticates any incoming packet flow to
      the RTP session.  Weak mitigations like blocking additional media
      streams in session contexts easily lead to a DoS vulnerability in
      addition to preventing certain RTP extensions or use cases that
      rely on multiple media streams, such as RTP retransmission
      [RFC4588] to function.

   Forged Feedback:  The built-in RTCP also offers a large attack
      surface for a couple of different types of attacks.  One venue is
      to send RTCP feedback to the media sender indicating large amounts
      of packet loss and thus trigger a media bitrate adaptation
      response from the sender resulting in lowered media quality and
      potentially a shutdown of the media stream.  Another attack is to
      perform a resource-exhaustion attack on the receiver by using many
      SSRC identifiers to create large state tables and increase the
      RTCP-related processing demands.

   RTP/RTCP Extensions:  RTP and RTCP extensions generally provide
      additional and sometimes extremely powerful tools for DoS attacks
      or service disruption.  For example, the Code Control Message
      [RFC5104] RTCP extensions enables both the lock down of the
      bitrate to low values and disruption of video quality by
      requesting intra-frames.

   Taking into account the above general discussion in Section 21.2 and
   the RTP-specific discussion in this section, it is clear that it is
   necessary that a strong security mechanism be supported to protect



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 216]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTP.  Therefore, this specification has the following requirements on
   RTP security functions for all RTSP agents that handle media streams
   and where media-stream transport is completed using RTP.

   RTSP agents supporting RTP MUST implement Secure RTP (SRTP) [RFC3711]
   and, thus, SAVP.  In addition, SAVPF [RFC5124] MUST also be supported
   if AVPF is implemented.  This specification requires no additional
   cryptographic transforms or configuration values beyond those
   specified as mandatory to implement in RFC 3711, i.e., AES-CM and
   HMAC-SHA1.  The default key-management mechanism that MUST be
   implemented is the one defined in MIKEY Key Establishment
   (Appendix C.1.4.1).  The MIKEY implementation MUST implement the
   necessary functions for MIKEY-RSA-R mode [RFC4738] and the SRTP
   parameter negotiation necessary to negotiate the supported SRTP
   transforms and parameters.

22.  IANA Considerations

   This section describes a number of registries for RTSP 2.0 that have
   been established and are maintained by IANA.  These registries are
   separate from any registries existing for RTSP 1.0.  For each
   registry, there is a description of the required content, the
   registration procedures, and the entries that this document
   registers.  For more information on extending RTSP, see Section 2.7.
   In addition, this document registers three SDP attributes.

   Registries or entries in registries that have been made for RTSP 1.0
   are not moved to RTSP 2.0: the registries and entries of RTSP 1.0 and
   RTSP 2.0 are independent.  If any registry or entry in a registry is
   also required in RTSP 2.0, it MUST follow the procedure defined below
   to allocate the registry or entry in a registry.

   The sections describing how to register an item use some of the
   registration policies described in [RFC5226] -- namely, "First Come
   First Served", "Expert Review", "Specification Required", and
   "Standards Action".

   In case a registry requires a contact person, the authors (with
   Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> as primary) are
   the contact persons for any entries created by this document.

   IANA will request the following information for any registration
   request:

   o  A name of the item to register according to the rules specified by
      the intended registry





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 217]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  Indication of who has change control over the feature (for
      example, the IETF, ISO, ITU-T, other international standardization
      bodies, a consortium, a particular company or group of companies,
      or an individual)

   o  A reference to a further description, if available, for example
      (in decreasing order of preference), an RFC, a published standard,
      a published paper, a patent filing, a technical report, documented
      source code or a computer manual

   o  For proprietary features, contact information (postal and email
      address)

22.1.  Feature Tags

22.1.1.  Description

   When a client and server try to determine what part and functionality
   of the RTSP specification and any future extensions that its
   counterpart implements, there is need for a namespace.  This registry
   contains named entries representing certain functionality.

   The usage of feature tags is explained in Section 11 and
   Section 13.1.

22.1.2.  Registering New Feature Tags with IANA

   The registering of feature tags is done on a First Come, First Served
   [RFC5226] basis.

   The registry entry for a feature tag has the following information:

   o  The name of the feature tag

      *  If the registrant indicates that the feature is proprietary,
         IANA should request a vendor "prefix" portion of the name.  The
         name will then be the vendor prefix followed by a "." followed
         by the rest of the provided feature name.

      *  If the feature is not proprietary, then IANA need not collect a
         prefix for the name.

   o  A one-paragraph description of what the feature tag represents

   o  The applicability (server, client, proxy, or some combination)

   o  A reference to a specification, if applicable




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 218]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Feature tag names (including the vendor prefix) may contain any non-
   space and non-control characters.  There is no length limit on
   feature tags.

   Examples for a vendor tag describing a proprietary feature are:

         vendorA.specfeat01

         vendorA.specfeat02

22.1.3.  Registered Entries

   The following feature tags are defined in this specification and
   hereby registered.  The change control belongs to the IETF.

   play.basic:  The implementation for delivery and playback operations
         according to the core RTSP specification, as defined in this
         memo.  Applies for clients, servers, and proxies.  See
         Section 11.1.

   play.scale:  Support of scale operations for media playback.  Applies
         only for servers.  See Section 18.46.

   play.speed:  Support of the speed functionality for media delivery.
         Applies only for servers.  See Section 18.50.

   setup.rtp.rtcp.mux:  Support of the RTP and RTCP multiplexing as
         discussed in Appendix C.1.6.4.  Applies for both client and
         servers and any media caching proxy.

   The IANA registry is a table with the name, description, and
   reference for each feature tag.

22.2.  RTSP Methods

22.2.1.  Description

   Methods are described in Section 13.  Extending the protocol with new
   methods allows for totally new functionality.

22.2.2.  Registering New Methods with IANA

   A new method is registered through a Standards Action [RFC5226]
   because new methods may radically change the protocol's behavior and
   purpose.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 219]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   A specification for a new RTSP method consists of the following
   items:

   o  A method name that follows the ABNF rules for methods.

   o  A clear specification of what a request using the method does and
      what responses are expected.  In which directions the method is
      used: C->S, S->C, or both.  How the use of headers, if any,
      modifies the behavior and effect of the method.

   o  A list or table specifying which of the IANA-registered headers
      that are allowed to be used with the method in the request or/and
      response.  The list or table SHOULD follow the format of tables in
      Section 18.

   o  Describe how the method relates to network proxies.

22.2.3.  Registered Entries

   This specification, RFC 7826, registers 10 methods: DESCRIBE,
   GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PAUSE, PLAY, PLAY_NOTIFY, REDIRECT, SETUP,
   SET_PARAMETER, and TEARDOWN.  The initial table of the registry is
   provided below.

   Method         Directionality           Reference
   -----------------------------------------------------
   DESCRIBE       C->S                     RFC 7826
   GET_PARAMETER  C->S, S->C               RFC 7826
   OPTIONS        C->S, S->C               RFC 7826
   PAUSE          C->S                     RFC 7826
   PLAY           C->S                     RFC 7826
   PLAY_NOTIFY    S->C                     RFC 7826
   REDIRECT       S->C                     RFC 7826
   SETUP          C->S                     RFC 7826
   SET_PARAMETER  C->S, S->C               RFC 7826
   TEARDOWN       C->S, S->C               RFC 7826

22.3.  RTSP Status Codes

22.3.1.  Description

   A status code is the three-digit number used to convey information in
   RTSP response messages; see Section 8.  The number space is limited,
   and care should be taken not to fill the space.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 220]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.3.2.  Registering New Status Codes with IANA

   A new status code registration follows the policy of IETF Review
   [RFC5226].  New RTSP functionality requiring Status Codes should
   first be registered in the range of x50-x99.  Only when the range is
   full should registrations be made in the x00-x49 range, unless it is
   to adopt an HTTP extension to RTSP.  This is done to enable any HTTP
   extension to be adopted to RTSP without needing to renumber any
   related status codes.  A specification for a new status code must
   include the following:

   o  The registered number.

   o  A description of what the status code means and the expected
      behavior of the sender and receiver of the code.

22.3.3.  Registered Entries

   RFC 7826 (this document) registers the numbered status code defined
   in the ABNF entry "Status-Code", except "extension-code" (that
   defines the syntax allowed for future extensions) in Section 20.2.2.

22.4.  RTSP Headers

22.4.1.  Description

   By specifying new headers, one or more methods can be enhanced in
   many different ways.  An unknown header will be ignored by the
   receiving agent.  If the new header is vital for certain
   functionality, a feature tag for the functionality can be created and
   demanded to be used by the counterpart with the inclusion of a
   Require header carrying the feature tag.

22.4.2.  Registering New Headers with IANA

   Registrations can be made following the Expert Review policy
   [RFC5226].  A specification is recommended to be provided, preferably
   an RFC or other specification from a Standards Developing
   Organization.  The minimal information in a registration request is
   the header name and the contact information.

   The expert reviewer verifies that the registration request contains
   the following information:

   o  The name of the header.

   o  An ABNF specification of the header syntax.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 221]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  A list or table specifying when the header may be used,
      encompassing all methods, their request or response, and the
      direction (C->S or S->C).

   o  How the header is to be handled by proxies.

   o  A description of the purpose of the header.

22.4.3.  Registered Entries

   All headers specified in Section 18 in RFC 7826 have been registered.
   The registry includes the header name and reference.

   Furthermore, the following legacy RTSP headers defined in other
   specifications are registered with header name, and reference
   according to below list.  Note: these references may not fulfill all
   of the above rules for registrations due to their legacy status.

   o  x-wap-profile defined in [TS-26234].  The x-wap-profile request-
      header contains one or more absolute URLs to the requesting
      agent's device-capability profile.

   o  x-wap-profile-diff defined in [TS-26234].  The x-wap-profile-diff
      request-header contains a subset of a device-capability profile.

   o  x-wap-profile-warning defined in [TS-26234].  The x-wap-profile-
      warning is a response-header that contains error codes explaining
      to what extent the server has been able to match the terminal
      request in regard to device-capability profiles, as described
      using x-wap-profile and x-wap-profile-diff headers.

   o  x-predecbufsize defined in [TS-26234].  This response-header
      provides an RTSP agent with the TS 26.234 Annex G hypothetical
      pre-decoder buffer size.

   o  x-initpredecbufperiod defined in [TS-26234].  This response-header
      provides an RTSP agent with the TS 26.234 Annex G hypothetical
      pre-decoder buffering period.

   o  x-initpostdecbufperiod defined in [TS-26234].  This response-
      header provides an RTSP agent with the TS 26.234 Annex G post-
      decoder buffering period.

   o  3gpp-videopostdecbufsize defined in [TS-26234].  This response-
      header provides an RTSP agent with the TS 26.234 defined post-
      decoder buffer size usable for H.264 (AVC) video streams.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 222]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  3GPP-Link-Char defined in [TS-26234].  This request-header
      provides the RTSP server with the RTSP client's link
      characteristics as determined from the radio interface.  The
      information that can be provided are guaranteed bitrate, maximum
      bitrate and maximum transfer delay.

   o  3GPP-Adaptation defined in [TS-26234].  This general-header is
      part of the bitrate adaptation solution specified for the Packet-
      switched Streaming Service (PSS).  It provides the RTSP client's
      buffer sizes and target buffer levels to the server, and responses
      are used to acknowledge the support and values.

   o  3GPP-QoE-Metrics defined in [TS-26234].  This general-header is
      used by PSS RTSP agents to negotiate the quality of experience
      metrics that a client should gather and report to the server.

   o  3GPP-QoE-Feedback defined in [TS-26234].  This request-header is
      used by RTSP clients supporting PSS to report the actual values of
      the metrics gathered in its quality of experience metering.

   The use of "x-" is NOT RECOMMENDED, but the above headers in the list
   were defined prior to the clarification.

22.5.  Accept-Credentials

   The security framework's TLS connection mechanism has two
   registerable entities.

22.5.1.  Accept-Credentials Policies

   This registry is for policies for an RTSP proxy's handling and
   verification of TLS certificates when establishing an outbound TLS
   connection on behalf of a client.  In Section 19.3.1, three policies
   for how to handle certificates are specified.  Further policies may
   be defined; registration is made through Standards Action [RFC5226].
   A registration request is required to contain the following
   information:

   o  Name of the policy.

   o  Text that describes how the policy works for handling the
      certificates.

   o  A contact person.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 223]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This specification registers the following values:

   Any:  A policy requiring the proxy to accept any received
         certificate.

   Proxy:  A policy where the proxy applies its own policies to
         determine which certificates are accepted.

   User: A policy where the certificate is required to be forwarded down
         the proxy chain to the client, thus allowing the user to
         decided to accept or refuse a certificate.

22.5.2.  Accept-Credentials Hash Algorithms

   The Accept-Credentials header (see Section 18.2) allows for the usage
   of other algorithms for hashing the DER records of accepted entities.
   The registration of any future algorithm is expected to be extremely
   rare and could also cause interoperability problems.  Therefore, the
   bar for registering new algorithms is intentionally placed high.

   Any registration of a new hash algorithm requires Standards Action
   [RFC5226].  The registration needs to fulfill the following
   requirement:

   o  The algorithms identifier meeting the "token" ABNF requirement.

   o  Provide a definition of the algorithm.

   The registered value is:

   Hash Alg. ID   Reference
   ------------------------
   sha-256        RFC 7826

22.6.  Cache-Control Cache Directive Extensions

   There exist a number of cache directives that can be sent in the
   Cache-Control header.  A registry for these cache directives has been
   established by IANA.  New registrations in this registry require
   Standards Action or IESG Approval [RFC5226].  A registration request
   needs to contain the following information.

   o  The name of the cache directive.

   o  A definition of the parameter value, if any is allowed.

   o  The specification if it is a request or response directive.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 224]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  Text that explains how the cache directive is used for RTSP-
      controlled media streams.

   o  A contact person.

   This specification registers the following values:

      no-cache:

      public:

      private:

      no-transform:

      only-if-cached:

      max-stale:

      min-fresh:

      must-revalidate:

      proxy-revalidate:

      max-age:

   The registry contains the name of the directive and the reference.

22.7.  Media Properties

22.7.1.  Description

   The media streams being controlled by RTSP can have many different
   properties.  The media properties required to cover the use cases
   that were in mind when writing the specification are defined.
   However, it can be expected that further innovation will result in
   new use cases or media streams with properties not covered by the
   ones specified here.  Thus, new media properties can be specified.
   As new media properties may need a substantial amount of new
   definitions to correctly specify behavior for this property, the bar
   is intended to be high.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 225]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.7.2.  Registration Rules

   Registering a new media property is done following the Specification
   Required policy [RFC5226].  The expert reviewer verifies that a
   registration request fulfills the following requirements.

   o  An ABNF definition of the media property value name that meets
      "media-prop-ext" definition is included.

   o  A definition of which media property group it belongs to or define
      a new group is included.

   o  A description of all changes to the behavior of RTSP as result of
      these changes is included.

   o  A contact person for the registration is listed.

22.7.3.  Registered Values

   This specification registers the ten values listed in Section 18.29.
   The registry contains the property group, the name of the media
   property, and the reference.

22.8.  Notify-Reason Values

22.8.1.  Description

   Notify-Reason values are used to indicate the reason the notification
   was sent.  Each reason has its associated rules on what headers and
   information may or must be included in the notification.  New
   notification behaviors need to be specified to enable interoperable
   usage; thus, a specification of each new value is required.

22.8.2.  Registration Rules

   Registrations for new Notify-Reason values follow the Specification
   Required policy [RFC5226].  The expert reviewer verifies that the
   request fulfills the following requirements:

   o  An ABNF definition of the Notify-Reason value name that meets
      "Notify-Reason-extension" definition is included.

   o  A description of which headers shall be included in the request
      and response, when it should be sent, and any effect it has on the
      server client state is made clear.

   o  A contact person for the registration is listed.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 226]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.8.3.  Registered Values

   This specification registers three values defined in the Notify-Reas-
   val ABNF, Section 20.2.3:

   end-of-stream:  This Notify-Reason value indicates the end of a media
      stream.

   media-properties-update:  This Notify-Reason value allows the server
      to indicate that the properties of the media have changed during
      the playout.

   scale-change:  This Notify-Reason value allows the server to notify
      the client about a change in the scale of the media.

   The registry contains the name, description, and reference.

22.9.  Range Header Formats

22.9.1.  Description

   The Range header (Section 18.40) allows for different range formats.
   These range formats also need an identifier to be used in the Accept-
   Ranges header (Section 18.5).  New range formats may be registered,
   but moderation should be applied as it makes interoperability more
   difficult.

22.9.2.  Registration Rules

   A registration follows the Specification Required policy [RFC5226].
   The expert reviewer verifies that the request fulfills the following
   requirements:

   o  An ABNF definition of the range format that fulfills the "range-
      ext" definition is included.

   o  The range format identifier used in Accept-Ranges header according
      to the "extension-format" definition is defined.

   o  Rules for how one handles the range when using a negative Scale
      are included.

   o  A contact person for the registration is listed.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 227]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.9.3.  Registered Values

   The registry contains the Range header format identifier, the name of
   the range format, and the reference.  This specification registers
   the following values.

   npt:  Normal Play Time

   clock:  UTC Absolute Time format

   smpte:  SMPTE Timestamps

   smpte-30-drop:  SMPTE Timestamps 29.97 Frames/sec (30 Hz with Drop)

   smpte-25:  SMPTE Timestamps 25 Frames/sec

22.10.  Terminate-Reason Header

   The Terminate-Reason header (Section 18.52) has two registries for
   extensions.

22.10.1.  Redirect Reasons

   This registry contains reasons for session termination that can be
   included in a Terminate-Reason header (Section 18.52).  Registrations
   follow the Expert Review policy [RFC5226].  The expert reviewer
   verifies that the registration request contains the following
   information:

   o  That the value follows the Terminate-Reason ABNF, i.e., be a
      token.

   o  That the specification provide a definition of what procedures are
      to be followed when a client receives this redirect reason.

   o  A contact person

   This specification registers three values:

   o  Session-Timeout

   o  Server-Admin

   o  Internal-Error

   The registry contains the name of the Redirect Reason and the
   reference.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 228]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.10.2.  Terminate-Reason Header Parameters

   This registry contains parameters that may be included in the
   Terminate-Reason header (Section 18.52) in addition to a reason.
   Registrations are made under the Specification Required policy
   [RFC5226].  The expert reviewer verifies that the registration
   request contains the following:

   o  A parameter name.

   o  A parameter following the syntax allowed by the RTSP 2.0
      specification.

   o  A reference to the specification.

   o  A contact person.

   This specification registers:

   o  time

   o  user-msg

   The registry contains the name of the Terminate Reason and the
   reference.

22.11.  RTP-Info Header Parameters

22.11.1.  Description

   The RTP-Info header (Section 18.45) carries one or more parameter
   value pairs with information about a particular point in the RTP
   stream.  RTP extensions or new usages may need new types of
   information.  As RTP information that could be needed is likely to be
   generic enough, and to maximize the interoperability, new
   registration is made under the Specification Required policy.

22.11.2.  Registration Rules

   Registrations for new RTP-Info values follow the policy of
   Specification Required [RFC5226].  The expert reviewer verifies that
   the registration request contains the following information.

   o  An ABNF definition that meets the "generic-param" definition.

   o  A reference to the specification.

   o  A contact person for the registration.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 229]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.11.3.  Registered Values

   This specification registers the following parameter value pairs:

   o  url

   o  ssrc

   o  seq

   o  rtptime

   The registry contains the name of the parameter and the reference.

22.12.  Seek-Style Policies

22.12.1.  Description

   Seek-Style policy defines how the RTSP agent seeks in media content
   when given a position within the media content.  New seek policies
   may be registered; however, a large number of these will complicate
   implementation substantially.  The impact of unknown policies is that
   the server will not honor the unknown and will use the server default
   policy instead.

22.12.2.  Registration Rules

   Registrations of new Seek-Style policies follow the Specification
   Required policy [RFC5226].  The expert reviewer verifies that the
   registration request fulfills the following requirements:

   o  Has an ABNF definition of the Seek-Style policy name that meets
      "Seek-S-value-ext" definition.

   o  Includes a short description.

   o  Lists a contact person for the registration.

   o  Includes a description of which headers shall be included in the
      request and response, when it should be sent, and any affect it
      has on the server-client state.

22.12.3.  Registered Values

   This specification registers four values (Name - Short Description):

   o  RAP - Using the closest Random Access Point prior to or at the
      requested start position.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 230]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  CoRAP - Conditional Random Access Point is like RAP, but only if
      the RAP is closer prior to the requested start position than
      current pause point.

   o  First-Prior - The first-prior policy will start delivery with the
      media unit that has a playout time first prior to the requested
      start position.

   o  Next - The next media units after the provided start position.

   The registry contains the name of the Seek-Style policy, the
   description, and the reference.

22.13.  Transport Header Registries

   The transport header (Section 18.54) contains a number of parameters
   that have possibilities for future extensions.  Therefore, registries
   for these are defined below.

22.13.1.  Transport Protocol Identifier

   A Transport Protocol specification consists of a transport protocol
   identifier, representing some combination of transport protocols, and
   any number of transport header parameters required or optional to use
   with the identified protocol specification.  This registry contains
   the identifiers used by registered transport protocol identifiers.

   A registration for the parameter transport protocol identifier
   follows the Specification Required policy [RFC5226].  The expert
   reviewer verifies that the registration request fulfills the
   following requirements:

   o  A contact person or organization with address and email.

   o  A value definition that follows the ABNF syntax definition of
      "transport-id" Section 20.2.3.

   o  A descriptive text that explains how the registered values are
      used in RTSP, which underlying transport protocols are used, and
      any required Transport header parameters.

   The registry contains the protocol ID string and the reference.









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 231]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This specification registers the following values:

   RTP/AVP:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport in
         combination with the "RTP Profile for Audio and Video
         Conferences with Minimal Control" [RFC3551] over UDP.  The
         usage is explained in RFC 7826, Appendix C.1.

   RTP/AVP/UDP:  the same as RTP/AVP.

   RTP/AVPF:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport in
         combination with the "Extended RTP Profile for RTCP-based
         Feedback (RTP/AVPF)" [RFC4585] over UDP.  The usage is
         explained in RFC 7826, Appendix C.1.

   RTP/AVPF/UDP:  the same as RTP/AVPF.

   RTP/SAVP:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport in
         combination with the "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol
         (SRTP)" [RFC3711] over UDP.  The usage is explained in RFC
         7826, Appendix C.1.

   RTP/SAVP/UDP:  the same as RTP/SAVP.

   RTP/SAVPF:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport in
         combination with the "Extended Secure RTP Profile for Real-time
         Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/SAVPF)"
         [RFC5124] over UDP.  The usage is explained in RFC 7826,
         Appendix C.1.

   RTP/SAVPF/UDP:  the same as RTP/SAVPF.

   RTP/AVP/TCP:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport
         in combination with the "RTP profile for audio and video
         conferences with minimal control" [RFC3551] over TCP.  The
         usage is explained in RFC 7826, Appendix C.2.2.

   RTP/AVPF/TCP:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport
         in combination with the "Extended RTP Profile for Real-time
         Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/AVPF)"
         [RFC4585] over TCP.  The usage is explained in RFC 7826,
         Appendix C.2.2.

   RTP/SAVP/TCP:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport
         in combination with the "The Secure Real-time Transport
         Protocol (SRTP)" [RFC3711] over TCP.  The usage is explained in
         RFC 7826, Appendix C.2.2.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 232]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   RTP/SAVPF/TCP:  Use of the RTP [RFC3550] protocol for media transport
         in combination with the "Extended Secure RTP Profile for Real-
         time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/
         SAVPF)" [RFC5124] over TCP.  The usage is explained in RFC
         7826, Appendix C.2.2.

22.13.2.  Transport Modes

   The Transport Mode is a Transport header (Section 18.54) parameter.
   It is used to identify the general mode of media transport.  The PLAY
   value registered defines a PLAYBACK mode, where media flows from
   server to client.

   A registration for the transport parameter mode follows the Standards
   Action policy [RFC5226].  The registration request needs to meet the
   following requirements:

   o  A value definition that follows the ABNF "token" definition
      Section 20.2.3.

   o  Text that explains how the registered value is used in RTSP.

   This specification registers one value:

   PLAY: See RFC 7826.

   The registry contains the transport mode value and the reference.

22.13.3.  Transport Parameters

   Transport Parameters are different parameters used in a Transport
   header's transport specification (Section 18.54) to provide
   additional information required beyond the transport protocol
   identifier to establish a functioning transport.

   A registration for parameters that may be included in the Transport
   header follows the Specification Required policy [RFC5226].  The
   expert reviewer verifies that the registration request fulfills the
   following requirements:

   o  A Transport Parameter Name following the "token" ABNF definition.

   o  A value definition, if the parameter takes a value, that follows
      the ABNF definition of "trn-par-value" Section 20.2.3.

   o  Text that explains how the registered value is used in RTSP.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 233]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   This specification registers all the transport parameters defined in
   Section 18.54.  This is a copy of that list:

   o  unicast

   o  multicast

   o  interleaved

   o  ttl

   o  layers

   o  ssrc

   o  mode

   o  dest_addr

   o  src_addr

   o  setup

   o  connection

   o  RTCP-mux

   o  MIKEY

   The registry contains the transport parameter name and the reference.

22.14.  URI Schemes

   This specification updates two URI schemes: one previously
   registered, "rtsp", and one missing in the registry, "rtspu"
   (previously only defined in RTSP 1.0 [RFC2326]).  One new URI scheme,
   "rtsps", is also registered.  These URI schemes are registered in an
   existing registry ("Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Schemes") not
   created by this memo.  Registrations follow [RFC7595].

22.14.1.  The "rtsp" URI Scheme

   URI scheme name:  rtsp

   Status:  Permanent

   URI scheme syntax:  See Section 20.2.1 of RFC 7826.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 234]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   URI scheme semantics:  The rtsp scheme is used to indicate resources
         accessible through the usage of the Real-Time Streaming
         Protocol (RTSP).  RTSP allows different operations on the
         resource identified by the URI, but the primary purpose is the
         streaming delivery of the resource to a client.  However, the
         operations that are currently defined are DESCRIBE,
         GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PLAY, PLAY_NOTIFY, PAUSE, REDIRECT,
         SETUP, SET_PARAMETER, and TEARDOWN.

   Encoding considerations:  IRIs in this scheme are defined and need to
         be encoded as RTSP URIs when used within RTSP.  That encoding
         is done according to RFC 3987.

   Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:  RTSP 1.0 (RFC
         2326), RTSP 2.0 (RFC 7826).

   Interoperability considerations:  The extensions in the URI syntax
         performed between RTSP 1.0 and 2.0 can create interoperability
         issues.  The changes are:

            Support for IPv6 literals in the host part and future IP
            literals through a mechanism as defined in RFC 3986.

            A new relative format to use in RTSP elements that is not
            required to start with "/".

         The above changes should have no impact on interoperability as
         discussed in detail in Section 4.2 of RFC 7826.

   Security considerations:  All the security threats identified in
         Section 7 of RFC 3986 also apply to this scheme.  They need to
         be reviewed and considered in any implementation utilizing this
         scheme.

   Contact:  Magnus Westerlund, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com

   Author/Change controller:  IETF

   References:  RFC 2326, RFC 3986, RFC 3987, and RFC 7826

22.14.2.  The "rtsps" URI Scheme

   URI scheme name:  rtsps

   Status:  Permanent

   URI scheme syntax:  See Section 20.2.1 of RFC 7826.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 235]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   URI scheme semantics:  The rtsps scheme is used to indicate resources
         accessible through the usage of the Real-Time Streaming
         Protocol (RTSP) over TLS.  RTSP allows different operations on
         the resource identified by the URI, but the primary purpose is
         the streaming delivery of the resource to a client.  However,
         the operations that are currently defined are DESCRIBE,
         GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PLAY, PLAY_NOTIFY, PAUSE, REDIRECT,
         SETUP, SET_PARAMETER, and TEARDOWN.

   Encoding considerations:  IRIs in this scheme are defined and need to
         be encoded as RTSP URIs when used within RTSP.  That encoding
         is done according to RFC 3987.

   Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:  RTSP 1.0 (RFC
         2326), RTSP 2.0 (RFC 7826).

   Interoperability considerations:  The "rtsps" scheme was never
         officially defined for RTSP 1.0; however, it has seen
         widespread use in actual deployments of RTSP 1.0.  Therefore,
         this section discusses the believed changes between the
         unspecified RTSP 1.0 "rtsps" scheme and RTSP 2.0 definition.
         The extensions in the URI syntax performed between RTSP 1.0 and
         2.0 can create interoperability issues.  The changes are:

            Support for IPv6 literals in the host part and future IP
            literals through a mechanism as defined by RFC 3986.

            A new relative format to use in RTSP elements that is not
            required to start with "/".

         The above changes should have no impact on interoperability as
         discussed in detail in Section 4.2 of RFC 7826.

   Security considerations:  All the security threats identified in
         Section 7 of RFC 3986 also apply to this scheme.  They need to
         be reviewed and considered in any implementation utilizing this
         scheme.

   Contact:  Magnus Westerlund, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com

   Author/Change controller:  IETF

   References:  RFC 2326, RFC 3986, RFC 3987, and RFC 7826








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 236]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.14.3.  The "rtspu" URI Scheme

   URI scheme name:  rtspu

   Status:  Permanent

   URI scheme syntax:  See Section 3.2 of RFC 2326.

   URI scheme semantics:  The rtspu scheme is used to indicate resources
         accessible through the usage of the Real-Time Streaming
         Protocol (RTSP) over unreliable datagram transport.  RTSP
         allows different operations on the resource identified by the
         URI, but the primary purpose is the streaming delivery of the
         resource to a client.  However, the operations that are
         currently defined are DESCRIBE, GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS,
         REDIRECT,PLAY, PLAY_NOTIFY, PAUSE, SETUP, SET_PARAMETER, and
         TEARDOWN.

   Encoding considerations:  This scheme is not intended to be used with
         characters outside the US-ASCII repertoire.

   Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:  RTSP 1.0 (RFC
         2326).

   Interoperability considerations:  The definition of the transport
         mechanism of RTSP over UDP has interoperability issues.  That
         makes the usage of this scheme problematic.

   Security considerations:  All the security threats identified in
         Section 7 of RFC 3986 also apply to this scheme.  They need to
         be reviewed and considered in any implementation utilizing this
         scheme.

   Contact:  Magnus Westerlund, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com

   Author/Change controller:  IETF

   References:  RFC 2326













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 237]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


22.15.  SDP Attributes

   This specification defines three SDP [RFC4566] attributes that have
   been registered by IANA.

   SDP Attribute ("att-field"):

        Attribute name:     range
        Long form:          Media Range Attribute
        Type of name:       att-field
        Type of attribute:  both session and media level
        Subject to charset: No
        Purpose:            RFC 7826
        Reference:          RFC 2326, RFC 7826
        Values:             See ABNF definition.

        Attribute name:     control
        Long form:          RTSP control URI
        Type of name:       att-field
        Type of attribute:  both session and media level
        Subject to charset: No
        Purpose:            RFC 7826
        Reference:          RFC 2326, RFC 7826
        Values:             Absolute or Relative URIs.

        Attribute name:     mtag
        Long form:          Message Tag
        Type of name:       att-field
        Type of attribute:  both session and media level
        Subject to charset: No
        Purpose:            RFC 7826
        Reference:          RFC 7826
        Values:             See ABNF definition

22.16.  Media Type Registration for text/parameters

   Type name:  text

   Subtype name:  parameters

   Required parameters:

   Optional parameters:  charset: The charset parameter is applicable to
      the encoding of the parameter values.  The default charset is
      UTF-8, if the 'charset' parameter is not present.

   Encoding considerations:  8bit




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 238]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Security considerations:  This format may carry any type of
      parameters.  Some can have security requirements, like privacy,
      confidentiality, or integrity requirements.  The format has no
      built-in security protection.  For the usage, the transport can be
      protected between server and client using TLS.  However, care must
      be taken to consider if the proxies are also trusted with the
      parameters in case hop-by-hop security is used.  If stored as a
      file in a file system, the necessary precautions need to be taken
      in relation to the parameter requirements including object
      security such as S/MIME [RFC5751].

   Interoperability considerations:  This media type was mentioned as a
      fictional example in [RFC2326], but was not formally specified.
      This has resulted in usage of this media type that may not match
      its formal definition.

   Published specification:  RFC 7826, Appendix F.

   Applications that use this media type:  Applications that use RTSP
      and have additional parameters they like to read and set using the
      RTSP GET_PARAMETER and SET_PARAMETER methods.

   Additional information:

   Magic number(s):  N/A

   File extension(s):  N/A

   Macintosh file type code(s):  N/A

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
      Magnus Westerlund (magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com)

   Intended usage:   Common

   Restrictions on usage:   None

   Author:  Magnus Westerlund (magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com)

   Change controller:  IETF

   Addition Notes:









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 239]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


23.  References

23.1.  Normative References

   [FIPS180-4]
              National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
              "Federal Information Processing Standards Publication:
              Secure Hash Standard (SHS)", DOI 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4,
              August 2015, <http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/
              NIST.FIPS.180-4.pdf>.

   [RFC768]   Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc768>.

   [RFC793]   Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7,
              RFC 793, DOI 10.17487/RFC0793, September 1981,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc793>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC2460]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
              (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, DOI 10.17487/RFC2460,
              December 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2460>.

   [RFC2616]  Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
              Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
              Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2616, June 1999,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2616>.

   [RFC2617]  Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Lawrence, S.,
              Leach, P., Luotonen, A., and L. Stewart, "HTTP
              Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication",
              RFC 2617, DOI 10.17487/RFC2617, June 1999,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2617>.

   [RFC2818]  Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2818, May 2000,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2818>.

   [RFC3550]  Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
              Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
              Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, DOI 10.17487/RFC3550,
              July 2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3550>.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 240]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC3551]  Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for Audio and
              Video Conferences with Minimal Control", STD 65, RFC 3551,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3551, July 2003,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3551>.

   [RFC3629]  Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
              10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
              2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.

   [RFC3711]  Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K.
              Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)",
              RFC 3711, DOI 10.17487/RFC3711, March 2004,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3711>.

   [RFC3830]  Arkko, J., Carrara, E., Lindholm, F., Naslund, M., and K.
              Norrman, "MIKEY: Multimedia Internet KEYing", RFC 3830,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3830, August 2004,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3830>.

   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
              RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.

   [RFC3987]  Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
              Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, DOI 10.17487/RFC3987,
              January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3987>.

   [RFC4086]  Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker,
              "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4086>.

   [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
              Architecture", RFC 4291, DOI 10.17487/RFC4291, February
              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4291>.

   [RFC7595]  Thaler, D., Ed., Hansen, T., and T. Hardie, "Guidelines
              and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes", BCP 35, RFC
              7595, DOI 10.17487/RFC7595, June 2015, <http://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc7595>.

   [RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
              Description Protocol", RFC 4566, DOI 10.17487/RFC4566,
              July 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4566>.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 241]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC4571]  Lazzaro, J., "Framing Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP)
              and RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Packets over Connection-
              Oriented Transport", RFC 4571, DOI 10.17487/RFC4571, July
              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4571>.

   [RFC4585]  Ott, J., Wenger, S., Sato, N., Burmeister, C., and J. Rey,
              "Extended RTP Profile for Real-time Transport Control
              Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/AVPF)", RFC 4585,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4585, July 2006,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4585>.

   [RFC4648]  Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
              Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, October 2006,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4648>.

   [RFC4738]  Ignjatic, D., Dondeti, L., Audet, F., and P. Lin, "MIKEY-
              RSA-R: An Additional Mode of Key Distribution in
              Multimedia Internet KEYing (MIKEY)", RFC 4738,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4738, November 2006,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4738>.

   [RFC5124]  Ott, J. and E. Carrara, "Extended Secure RTP Profile for
              Real-time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback
              (RTP/SAVPF)", RFC 5124, DOI 10.17487/RFC5124, February
              2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5124>.

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.

   [RFC5246]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
              (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.

   [RFC5280]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
              Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
              Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
              (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 242]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC5322]  Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5322, October 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5322>.

   [RFC5646]  Phillips, A., Ed. and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying
              Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646,
              September 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>.

   [RFC5751]  Ramsdell, B. and S. Turner, "Secure/Multipurpose Internet
              Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message
              Specification", RFC 5751, DOI 10.17487/RFC5751, January
              2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5751>.

   [RFC5761]  Perkins, C. and M. Westerlund, "Multiplexing RTP Data and
              Control Packets on a Single Port", RFC 5761,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5761, April 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5761>.

   [RFC5888]  Camarillo, G. and H. Schulzrinne, "The Session Description
              Protocol (SDP) Grouping Framework", RFC 5888,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5888, June 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5888>.

   [RFC6838]  Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type
              Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13,
              RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, January 2013,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>.

   [RFC7230]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
              Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing",
              RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>.

   [RFC7231]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
              Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content", RFC 7231,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7231, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7231>.

   [RFC7232]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
              Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests", RFC 7232,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7232, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7232>.

   [RFC7233]  Fielding, R., Ed., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed.,
              "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests",
              RFC 7233, DOI 10.17487/RFC7233, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7233>.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 243]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC7234]  Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
              Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching",
              RFC 7234, DOI 10.17487/RFC7234, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7234>.

   [RFC7235]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
              Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication", RFC 7235,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7235, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7235>.

   [RFC7615]  Reschke, J., "HTTP Authentication-Info and Proxy-
              Authentication-Info Response Header Fields", RFC 7615,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7615, September 2015,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7615>.

   [RFC7616]  Shekh-Yusef, R., Ed., Ahrens, D., and S. Bremer, "HTTP
              Digest Access Authentication", RFC 7616,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7616, September 2015,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7616>.

   [RFC7617]  Reschke, J., "The 'Basic' HTTP Authentication Scheme",
              RFC 7617, DOI 10.17487/RFC7617, September 2015,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7617>.

   [RFC7825]  Goldberg, J., Westerlund, M., and T. Zeng, "A Network
              Address Translator (NAT) Traversal Mechanism for Media
              Controlled by Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)",
              RFC 7825, DOI 10.17487/RFC7825, December 2016,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7825>.

   [RTP-CIRCUIT-BREAKERS]
              Perkins, C. and V. Singh, "Multimedia Congestion Control:
              Circuit Breakers for Unicast RTP Sessions", Work in
              Progress, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-13,
              February 2016.

   [SMPTE-TC] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, "ST
              12-1:2008 For Television -- Time and Control Code",
              DOI 10.5594/SMPTE.ST12-1.2008, February 2008,
              <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/
              opac?punumber=7289818>.

   [TS-26234] 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), "Transparent
              end-to-end Packet-switched Streaming Service (PSS);
              Protocols and codecs", Technical Specification 26.234,
              Release 13, September 2015,
              <http://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/26234.htm>.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 244]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


23.2.  Informative References

   [ISO.13818-6.1995]
              International Organization for Standardization,
              "Information technology -- Generic coding of moving
              pictures and associated audio information - part 6:
              Extension for DSM-CC", ISO Draft Standard 13818-6:1998,
              October 1998,
              <http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/
              catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=25039>.

   [ISO.8601.2000]
              International Organization for Standardization, "Data
              elements and interchange formats - Information interchange
              - Representation of dates and times", ISO/IEC Standard
              8601, December 2000.

   [RFC791]   Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>.

   [RFC1123]  Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
              Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC1123, October 1989,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1123>.

   [RFC2068]  Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., and T.
              Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1",
              RFC 2068, DOI 10.17487/RFC2068, January 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2068>.

   [RFC2326]  Schulzrinne, H., Rao, A., and R. Lanphier, "Real Time
              Streaming Protocol (RTSP)", RFC 2326,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2326, April 1998,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2326>.

   [RFC2663]  Srisuresh, P. and M. Holdrege, "IP Network Address
              Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations",
              RFC 2663, DOI 10.17487/RFC2663, August 1999,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2663>.

   [RFC2974]  Handley, M., Perkins, C., and E. Whelan, "Session
              Announcement Protocol", RFC 2974, DOI 10.17487/RFC2974,
              October 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2974>.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 245]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC3261]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
              A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
              Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>.

   [RFC3264]  Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model
              with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3264, June 2002,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264>.

   [RFC3339]  Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet:
              Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.

   [RFC4145]  Yon, D. and G. Camarillo, "TCP-Based Media Transport in
              the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 4145,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4145, September 2005,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4145>.

   [RFC4567]  Arkko, J., Lindholm, F., Naslund, M., Norrman, K., and E.
              Carrara, "Key Management Extensions for Session
              Description Protocol (SDP) and Real Time Streaming
              Protocol (RTSP)", RFC 4567, DOI 10.17487/RFC4567, July
              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4567>.

   [RFC4588]  Rey, J., Leon, D., Miyazaki, A., Varsa, V., and R.
              Hakenberg, "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4588, July 2006,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4588>.

   [RFC4855]  Casner, S., "Media Type Registration of RTP Payload
              Formats", RFC 4855, DOI 10.17487/RFC4855, February 2007,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4855>.

   [RFC4856]  Casner, S., "Media Type Registration of Payload Formats in
              the RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences",
              RFC 4856, DOI 10.17487/RFC4856, February 2007,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4856>.

   [RFC5104]  Wenger, S., Chandra, U., Westerlund, M., and B. Burman,
              "Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile
              with Feedback (AVPF)", RFC 5104, DOI 10.17487/RFC5104,
              February 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5104>.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 246]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   [RFC5245]  Rosenberg, J., "Interactive Connectivity Establishment
              (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT)
              Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols", RFC 5245,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5245, April 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5245>.

   [RFC5389]  Rosenberg, J., Mahy, R., Matthews, P., and D. Wing,
              "Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", RFC 5389,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5389, October 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5389>.

   [RFC5583]  Schierl, T. and S. Wenger, "Signaling Media Decoding
              Dependency in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)",
              RFC 5583, DOI 10.17487/RFC5583, July 2009,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5583>.

   [RFC5905]  Mills, D., Martin, J., Ed., Burbank, J., and W. Kasch,
              "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms
              Specification", RFC 5905, DOI 10.17487/RFC5905, June 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5905>.

   [RFC6298]  Paxson, V., Allman, M., Chu, J., and M. Sargent,
              "Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer", RFC 6298,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6298, June 2011,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6298>.

   [Stevens98]
              Stevens, W., Fenner, B., and A. Rudoff, "Unix Networking
              Programming, Volume 1: The Sockets Networking API (3rd
              Edition)", 1998.





















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 247]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


Appendix A.  Examples

   This section contains several different examples trying to illustrate
   possible ways of using RTSP.  The examples can also help with the
   understanding of how functions of RTSP work.  However, remember that
   these are examples and the normative and syntax descriptions in the
   other sections take precedence.  Please also note that many of the
   examples have been broken into several lines, where following lines
   start with whitespace as allowed by the syntax.

A.1.  Media on Demand (Unicast)

   This is an example of media-on-demand streaming of media stored in a
   container file.  For the purposes of this example, a container file
   is a storage entity in which multiple continuous media types
   pertaining to the same end-user presentation are present.  In effect,
   the container file represents an RTSP presentation, with each of its
   components being RTSP-controlled media streams.  Container files are
   a widely used means to store such presentations.  While the
   components are transported as independent streams, it is desirable to
   maintain a common context for those streams at the server end.

      This enables the server to keep a single storage handle open
      easily.  It also allows treating all the streams equally in case
      of any prioritization of streams by the server.

   It is also possible that the presentation author may wish to prevent
   selective retrieval of the streams by the client in order to preserve
   the artistic effect of the combined media presentation.  Similarly,
   in such a tightly bound presentation, it is desirable to be able to
   control all the streams via a single control message using an
   aggregate URI.

   The following is an example of using a single RTSP session to control
   multiple streams.  It also illustrates the use of aggregate URIs.  In
   a container file, it is also desirable not to write any URI parts
   that are not kept when the container is distributed, like the host
   and most of the path element.  Therefore, this example also uses the
   "*" and relative URI in the delivered SDP.

   Also, this presentation description (SDP) is not cacheable, as the
   Expires header is set to an equal value with date indicating
   immediate expiration of its validity.

   Client C requests a presentation from media server M.  The movie is
   stored in a container file.  The client has obtained an RTSP URI to
   the container file.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 248]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
         Content-Type: application/sdp
         Content-Length: 271
         Content-Base: rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:20:32 +0000

         v=0
         o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4 198.51.100.5
         s=RTSP Session
         i=An Example of RTSP Session Usage
         e=adm@example.com
         c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
         a=control: *
         a=range:npt=00:00:00-00:10:34.10
         t=0 0
         m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
         a=control: trackID=1
         m=video 0 RTP/AVP 26
         a=control: trackID=4

   C->M: SETUP rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Require: play.basic
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr=":8000"/":8001"
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 2
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast; ssrc=93CB001E;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:8000"/"192.0.2.53:8001";
                    src_addr="198.51.100.5:9000"/"198.51.100.5:9001"
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:20:33 +0000
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:33 +0000
         Accept-Ranges: npt
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.02, Immutable, Unlimited






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 249]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->M: SETUP rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Require: play.basic
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr=":8002"/":8003"
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast; ssrc=A813FC13;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:8002"/"192.0.2.53:8003";
                    src_addr="198.51.100.5:9002"/"198.51.100.5:9003";

         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:20:33 +0000
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:33 +0000
         Accept-Range: NPT
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.8, Immutable, Unlimited

   C->M: PLAY rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 4
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Range: npt=30-
         Seek-Style: RAP
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 4
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:34 +0000
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: npt=30-634.10
         Seek-Style: RAP
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=12345;rtptime=3450012,
           url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1"
            ssrc=4F312DD8:seq=54321;rtptime=2876889

   C->M: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 5
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

   # Pause happens 0.87 seconds after starting to play





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 250]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 5
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:35 +0000
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: npt=30.87-634.10

   C->M: PLAY rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 6
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Range: npt=30.87-634.10
         Seek-Style: Next
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 6
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:22:13 +0000
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: npt=30.87-634.10
         Seek-Style: Next
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=12555;rtptime=6330012,
           url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1"
            ssrc=4F312DD8:seq=55021;rtptime=3132889

   C->M: TEARDOWN rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 7
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 7
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:31:53 +0000

A.2.  Media on Demand Using Pipelining

   This example is basically the example above (Appendix A.1), but now
   utilizing pipelining to speed up the setup.  It requires only two
   round-trip times until the media starts flowing.  First of all, the
   session description is retrieved to determine what media resources
   need to be set up.  In the second step, one sends the necessary SETUP
   requests and the PLAY request to initiate media delivery.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 251]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Client C requests a presentation from media server M.  The movie is
   stored in a container file.  The client has obtained an RTSP URI to
   the container file.

   C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
         Content-Type: application/sdp
         Content-Length: 271
         Content-Base: rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:20:32 +0000

         v=0
         o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4 192.0.2.5
         s=RTSP Session
         i=An Example of RTSP Session Usage
         e=adm@example.com
         c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
         a=control: *
         a=range:npt=00:00:00-00:10:34.10
         t=0 0
         m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
         a=control: trackID=1
         m=video 0 RTP/AVP 26
         a=control: trackID=4

   C->M: SETUP rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Require: play.basic
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr=":8000"/":8001"
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 252]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->M: SETUP rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Require: play.basic
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;dest_addr=":8002"/":8003"
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654

   C->M: PLAY rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 4
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Range: npt=0-
         Seek-Style: RAP
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 2
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:8000"/"192.0.2.53:8001";
                    src_addr="198.51.100.5:9000"/"198.51.100.5:9001";
                    ssrc=93CB001E
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:20:32 +0000
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
         Accept-Ranges: npt
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.2, Immutable, Unlimited

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:8002"/"192.0.2.53:8003;
                    src_addr="198.51.100.5:9002"/"198.51.100.5:9003";
                    ssrc=A813FC13
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Expires: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
         Accept-Range: NPT
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.8, Immutable, Unlimited









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 253]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 4
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:32 +0000
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: npt=0-623.10
         Seek-Style: RAP
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=12345;rtptime=3450012,
           url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1"
            ssrc=4F312DD8:seq=54321;rtptime=2876889
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654

A.3.  Secured Media Session for On-Demand Content

   This example is basically the above example (Appendix A.2), but now
   including establishment of SRTP crypto contexts to get a secured
   media delivery.  First of all, the client attempts to fetch this
   insecurely, but the server redirects to a URI indicating a
   requirement on using a secure connection for the RTSP messages.  The
   client establishes a TCP/TLS connection, and the session description
   is retrieved to determine what media resources need to be set up.  In
   the this session description, secure media (SRTP) is indicated.  In
   the next step, the client sends the necessary SETUP requests
   including MIKEY messages.  This is pipelined with a PLAY request to
   initiate media delivery.

   Client C requests a presentation from media server M.  The movie is
   stored in a container file.  The client has obtained an RTSP URI to
   the container file.

   Note: The MIKEY messages below are not valid MIKEY messages and are
   Base64-encoded random data to represent where the MIKEY messages
   would go.

   C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 301 Moved Permanently
         CSeq: 1
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:32 +0000
         Location: rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp

   C->M: Establish TCP/TLS connection and verify server's
         certificate that represents example.com.
         Used for all below RTSP messages.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 254]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->M: DESCRIBE rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 2
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:33 +0000
         Content-Type: application/sdp
         Content-Length: 271
         Content-Base: rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp/
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:25:33 +0000

         v=0
         o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4 192.0.2.5
         s=RTSP Session
         i=An Example of RTSP Session Usage
         e=adm@example.com
         c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
         a=control: *
         a=range:npt=00:00:00-00:10:34.10
         t=0 0
         m=audio 0 RTP/SAVP 0
         a=control: trackID=1
         m=video 0 RTP/SAVP 26
         a=control: trackID=4

   C->M: SETUP rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Require: play.basic
         Transport: RTP/SAVP;unicast;dest_addr=":8000"/":8001";
            MIKEY=VGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgZmlyc3Qgc3RyZWFtcyBNSUtFWSBtZXNzYWdl
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654

   C->M: SETUP rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 4
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Require: play.basic
         Transport: RTP/SAVP;unicast;dest_addr=":8002"/":8003";
            MIKEY=TUlLRVkgZm9yIHN0cmVhbSB0d2lzdGVyLjNncC90cmFja0lEPTQ=
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 255]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->M: PLAY rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 5
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Range: npt=0-
         Seek-Style: RAP
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Transport: RTP/SAVP;unicast;
            dest_addr="192.0.2.53:8000"/"192.0.2.53:8001";
            src_addr="198.51.100.5:9000"/"198.51.100.5:9001";
            ssrc=93CB001E;
            MIKEY=TUlLRVkgUmVzcG9uc2UgdHdpc3Rlci4zZ3AvdHJhY2tJRD0x
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:25:34 +0000
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:34 +0000
         Accept-Ranges: npt
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.2, Immutable, Unlimited

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 4
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Transport: RTP/SAVP;unicast;
            dest_addr="192.0.2.53:8002"/"192.0.2.53:8003;
            src_addr="198.51.100.5:9002"/"198.51.100.5:9003";
            ssrc=A813FC13;
            MIKEY=TUlLRVkgUmVzcG9uc2UgdHdpc3Rlci4zZ3AvdHJhY2tJRD00
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Expires: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:25:34 +0000
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:34 +0000
         Accept-Range: NPT
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.8, Immutable, Unlimited















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 256]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 5
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:34 +0000
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: npt=0-623.10
         Seek-Style: RAP
         RTP-Info: url="rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=4"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=12345;rtptime=3450012,
           url="rtsps://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1"
            ssrc=4F312DD8:seq=54321;rtptime=2876889;
         Pipelined-Requests: 7654

A.4.  Media on Demand (Unicast)

   An alternative example of media on demand with a few more tweaks is
   the following.  Client C requests a movie distributed from two
   different media servers A (audio.example.com) and V
   (video.example.com).  The media description is stored on a web server
   W.  The media description contains descriptions of the presentation
   and all its streams, including the codecs that are available and the
   protocol stack.

   In this example, the client is only interested in the last part of
   the movie.

   C->W: GET /twister.sdp HTTP/1.1
         Host: www.example.com
         Accept: application/sdp

   W->C: HTTP/1.1 200 OK
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:35:06 GMT
         Content-Type: application/sdp
         Content-Length: 278
         Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:06 GMT

         v=0
         o=- 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4 198.51.100.5
         s=RTSP Session
         e=adm@example.com
         c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
         a=range:npt=00:00:00-01:49:34
         t=0 0
         m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
         a=control:rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en
         m=video 0 RTP/AVP 31
         a=control:rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 257]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->A: SETUP rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;dest_addr=":3056"/":3057",
                    RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   A->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:3056"/"192.0.2.53:3057";
                    src_addr="198.51.100.5:5000"/"198.51.100.5:5001"
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:35:12 +0000
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:12 +0000
         Cache-Control: public
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.02, Immutable, Unlimited

   C->V: SETUP rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:3058"/"192.0.2.53:3059",
                    RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
























Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 258]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   V->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Session: P5it3pMo6xHkjUcDrNkBjf
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
            dest_addr="192.0.2.53:3058"/"192.0.2.53:3059";
            src_addr="198.51.100.5:5002"/"198.51.100.5:5003"
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:35:12 +0000
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Cache-Control: public
         Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:12 +0000
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=1.2, Immutable, Unlimited

   C->V: PLAY rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: P5it3pMo6xHkjUcDrNkBjf
         Range: smpte=0:10:00-

   V->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 2
         Session: P5it3pMo6xHkjUcDrNkBjf
         Range: smpte=0:10:00-1:49:23
         Seek-Style: First-Prior
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video"
                   ssrc=A17E189D:seq=12312232;rtptime=78712811
         Server: PhonyServer/2.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:35:13 +0000

   C->A: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: smpte=0:10:00-

   A->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 2
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Range: smpte=0:10:00-1:49:23
         Seek-Style: First-Prior
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en"
                   ssrc=3D124F01:seq=876655;rtptime=1032181
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:35:13 +0000







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 259]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->A: TEARDOWN rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

   A->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000

   C->V: TEARDOWN rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: P5it3pMo6xHkjUcDrNkBjf

   V->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/2.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000

   Even though the audio and video track are on two different servers
   that may start at slightly different times and may drift with respect
   to each other over time, the client can perform initial
   synchronization of the two media using RTP-Info and Range received in
   the PLAY responses.  If the two servers are time synchronized, the
   RTCP packets can also be used to maintain synchronization.

A.5.  Single-Stream Container Files

   Some RTSP servers may treat all files as though they are "container
   files", yet other servers may not support such a concept.  Because of
   this, clients needs to use the rules set forth in the session
   description for Request-URIs rather than assuming that a consistent
   URI may always be used throughout.  Below is an example of how a
   multi-stream server might expect a single-stream file to be served:
















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 260]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->S: DESCRIBE rtsp://foo.example.com/test.wav RTSP/2.0
         Accept: application/x-rtsp-mh, application/sdp
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Content-base: rtsp://foo.example.com/test.wav/
         Content-type: application/sdp
         Content-length: 163
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000

         v=0
         o=- 872653257 872653257 IN IP4 192.0.2.5
         s=mu-law wave file
         i=audio test
         c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
         t=0 0
         a=control: *
         m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
         a=control:streamid=0

   C->S: SETUP rtsp://foo.example.com/test.wav/streamid=0 RTSP/2.0
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
            dest_addr=":6970"/":6971";mode="PLAY"
         CSeq: 2
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
             dest_addr="192.0.2.53:6970"/"192.0.2.53:6971";
             src_addr="198.51.100.5:6970"/"198.51.100.5:6971";
             mode="PLAY";ssrc=EAB98712
         CSeq: 2
         Session: NYkqQYKk0bb12BY3goyoyO
         Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Accept-Ranges: npt
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.5, Immutable, Unlimited








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 261]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->S: PLAY rtsp://foo.example.com/test.wav/ RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: NYkqQYKk0bb12BY3goyoyO

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Session: NYkqQYKk0bb12BY3goyoyO
         Range: npt=0-600
         Seek-Style: RAP
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://foo.example.com/test.wav/streamid=0"
            ssrc=0D12F123:seq=981888;rtptime=3781123

   Note the different URI in the SETUP command and then the switch back
   to the aggregate URI in the PLAY command.  This makes complete sense
   when there are multiple streams with aggregate control, but it is
   less than intuitive in the special case where the number of streams
   is one.  However, the server has declared the aggregated control URI
   in the SDP; therefore, this is legal.

   In this case, it is also required that servers accept implementations
   that use the non-aggregated interpretation and use the individual
   media URI, like this:

   C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/test.wav/streamid=0 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Session: NYkqQYKk0bb12BY3goyoyO





















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 262]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


A.6.  Live Media Presentation Using Multicast

   The media server M chooses the multicast address and port.  Here, it
   is assumed that the web server only contains a pointer to the full
   description, while the media server M maintains the full description.

   C->W: GET /sessions.html HTTP/1.1
         Host: www.example.com

   W->C: HTTP/1.1 200 OK
         Content-Type: text/html

         <html>
           ...
           <a href "rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio">
              Streamed Live Music performance </a>
           ...
         </html>


   C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         Supported: play.basic, play.scale
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Content-Type: application/sdp
         Content-Length: 183
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Supported: play.basic

         v=0
         o=- 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4 192.0.2.5
         s=RTSP Session
         t=0 0
         m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0
         c=IN IP4 233.252.0.54/16
         a=control: rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio
         a=range:npt=0-










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 263]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->M: SETUP rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 2
         Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;
              dest_addr="233.252.0.54:3456"/"233.252.0.54:3457";ttl=16
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 2
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;
              dest_addr="233.252.0.54:3456"/"233.252.0.54:3457";ttl=16
              ;ssrc=4D12AB92/0DF876A3
         Session: qHj4jidpmF6zy9v9tNbtxr
         Accept-Ranges: npt, clock
         Media-Properties: No-Seeking, Time-Progressing, Time-Duration=0


   C->M: PLAY rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         Session: qHj4jidpmF6zy9v9tNbtxr
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Server: PhonyServer/1.0
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Session: qHj4jidpmF6zy9v9tNbtxr
         Seek-Style: Next
         Range:npt=1256-
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=1473; rtptime=80000

A.7.  Capability Negotiation

   This example illustrates how the client and server determine their
   capability to support a special feature, in this case, "play.scale".
   The server, through the client request and the included Supported
   header, learns that the client supports RTSP 2.0 and also supports
   the playback time scaling feature of RTSP.  The server's response
   contains the following feature-related information to the client; it
   supports the basic media delivery functions (play.basic), the
   extended functionality of time scaling of content (play.scale), and
   one "example.com" proprietary feature (com.example.flight).  The
   client also learns the methods supported (Public header) by the
   server for the indicated resource.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 264]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->S: OPTIONS rtsp://media.example.com/movie/twister.3gp RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         Supported: play.basic, play.scale
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Public:OPTIONS,SETUP,PLAY,PAUSE,TEARDOWN,DESCRIBE,GET_PARAMETER
         Allow: OPTIONS, SETUP, PLAY, PAUSE, TEARDOWN, DESCRIBE
         Server: PhonyServer/2.0
         Supported: play.basic, play.scale, com.example.flight

   When the client sends its SETUP request, it tells the server that it
   requires support of the play.scale feature for this session by
   including the Require header.

   C->S: SETUP rtsp://media.example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1 RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 3
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
                    dest_addr="192.0.2.53:3056"/"192.0.2.53:3057",
                    RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1
         Require: play.scale
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 3
         Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
         Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
            dest_addr="192.0.2.53:3056"/"192.0.2.53:3057";
            src_addr="198.51.100.5:5000"/"198.51.100.5:5001"
         Server: PhonyServer/2.0
         Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte
         Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.8, Immutable, Unlimited

Appendix B.  RTSP Protocol State Machine

   The RTSP session state machine describes the behavior of the protocol
   from RTSP session initialization through RTSP session termination.
   It is probably easiest to think of this as the server's state and
   then view the client as needing to track what it believes the
   server's state will be based on sent or received RTSP messages.
   Thus, in most cases, the state tables below can be read as: if the
   client does X, and assuming it fulfills any prerequisite(s), the
   (server) state will move to the new state and the indicated response
   will returned.  However, there are also server-to-client
   notifications or requests, where the action describes what



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 265]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   notification or request will occur, its requisites, what new state
   will result after the server has received the response, as well as
   describing the client's response to the action.

   The State machine is defined on a per-session basis, which is
   uniquely identified by the RTSP session identifier.  The session may
   contain one or more media streams depending on state.  If a single
   media stream is part of the session, it is in non-aggregated control.
   If two or more are part of the session, it is in aggregated control.

   The below state machine is an informative description of the
   protocol's behavior.  In case of ambiguity with the earlier parts of
   this specification, the description in the earlier parts take
   precedence.

B.1.  States

   The state machine contains three states, described below.  For each
   state, there exists a table that shows which requests and events are
   allowed and whether they will result in a state change.

   Init: Initial state, no session exists.

   Ready:  Session is ready to start playing.

   Play: Session is playing, i.e., sending media-stream data in the
         direction S->C.

B.2.  State Variables

   This representation of the state machine needs more than its state to
   work.  A small number of variables are also needed, and they are
   explained below.

   NRM:  The number of media streams that are part of this session.

   RP:   Resume point, the point in the presentation time line at which
         a request to continue playing will resume from.  A time format
         for the variable is not mandated.

B.3.  Abbreviations

   To make the state tables more compact, a number of abbreviations are
   used, which are explained below.

   IFI:  IF Implemented.

   md:   Media



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 266]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   PP:   Pause Point, the point in the presentation timeline at which
         the presentation was paused.

   Prs:  Presentation, the complete multimedia presentation.

   RedP: Redirect Point, the point in the presentation timeline at which
         a REDIRECT was specified to occur.

   SES:  Session.

B.4.  State Tables

   This section contains a table for each state.  The table contains all
   the requests and events on which this state is allowed to act.  The
   events that are method names are, unless noted, requests with the
   given method in the direction client to server (C->S).  In some
   cases, there exists one or more requisites.  The response column
   tells what type of response actions should be performed.  Possible
   actions that are requested for an event include: response codes,
   e.g., 200, headers that need to be included in the response, setting
   of state variables, or settings of other session-related parameters.
   The new state column tells which state the state machine changes to.

   The response to a valid request meeting the requisites is normally a
   2xx (SUCCESS) unless otherwise noted in the response column.  The
   exceptions need to be given a response according to the response
   column.  If the request does not meet the requisite, is erroneous, or
   some other type of error occurs, the appropriate response code is to
   be sent.  If the response code is a 4xx, the session state is
   unchanged.  A response code of 3rr will result in that the session
   being ended and its state changed to Init.  A response code of 304
   results in no state change.  However, there are restrictions to when
   a 3rr response may be used.  A 5xx response does not result in any
   change of the session state, except if the error is not possible to
   recover from.  An unrecoverable error results in the ending of the
   session.  In the general case, if it can't be determined whether or
   not it was an unrecoverable error, the client will be required to
   test.  In the case that the next request after a 5xx is responded to
   with a 454 (Session Not Found), the client knows that the session has
   ended.  For any request message that cannot be responded to within
   the time defined in Section 10.4, a 100 response must be sent.

   The server will time out the session after the period of time
   specified in the SETUP response, if no activity from the client is
   detected.  Therefore, there exists a timeout event for all states
   except Init.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 267]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   In the case that NRM = 1, the presentation URI is equal to the media
   URI or a specified presentation URI.  For NRM > 1, the presentation
   URI needs to be other than any of the media that are part of the
   session.  This applies to all states.

   +---------------+-----------------+---------------------------------+
   | Event         | Prerequisite    | Response                        |
   +---------------+-----------------+---------------------------------+
   | DESCRIBE      | Needs REDIRECT  | 3rr, Redirect                   |
   |               |                 |                                 |
   | DESCRIBE      |                 | 200, Session description        |
   |               |                 |                                 |
   | OPTIONS       | Session ID      | 200, Reset session timeout      |
   |               |                 | timer                           |
   |               |                 |                                 |
   | OPTIONS       |                 | 200                             |
   |               |                 |                                 |
   | SET_PARAMETER | Valid parameter | 200, change value of parameter  |
   |               |                 |                                 |
   | GET_PARAMETER | Valid parameter | 200, return value of parameter  |
   +---------------+-----------------+---------------------------------+

                Table 9: Non-State-Machine Changing Events

   The methods in Table 9 do not have any effect on the state machine or
   the state variables.  However, some methods do change other session-
   related parameters, for example, SET_PARAMETER, which will set the
   parameter(s) specified in its body.  Also, all of these methods that
   allow the Session header will also update the keep-alive timer for
   the session.

   +------------------+----------------+-----------+-------------------+
   | Action           | Requisite      | New State | Response          |
   +------------------+----------------+-----------+-------------------+
   | SETUP            |                | Ready     | NRM=1, RP=0.0     |
   |                  |                |           |                   |
   | SETUP            | Needs Redirect | Init      | 3rr Redirect      |
   |                  |                |           |                   |
   | S -> C: REDIRECT | No Session hdr | Init      | Terminate all SES |
   +------------------+----------------+-----------+-------------------+

                           Table 10: State: Init

   The initial state of the state machine (Table 10) can only be left by
   processing a correct SETUP request.  As seen in the table, the two
   state variables are also set by a correct request.  This table also
   shows that a correct SETUP can in some cases be redirected to another
   URI or server by a 3rr response.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 268]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   +-------------+------------------------+---------+------------------+
   | Action      | Requisite              | New     | Response         |
   |             |                        | State   |                  |
   +-------------+------------------------+---------+------------------+
   | SETUP       | New URI                | Ready   | NRM +=1          |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | SETUP       | URI Setup prior        | Ready   | Change transport |
   |             |                        |         | param            |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | TEARDOWN    | Prs URI,               | Init    | No session hdr,  |
   |             |                        |         | NRM = 0          |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | TEARDOWN    | md URI,NRM=1           | Init    | No Session hdr,  |
   |             |                        |         | NRM = 0          |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | TEARDOWN    | md URI,NRM>1           | Ready   | Session hdr, NRM |
   |             |                        |         | -= 1             |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | PLAY        | Prs URI, No range      | Play    | Play from RP     |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | PLAY        | Prs URI, Range         | Play    | According to     |
   |             |                        |         | range            |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | PLAY        | md URI, NRM=1, Range   | Play    | According to     |
   |             |                        |         | range            |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | PLAY        | md URI, NRM=1          | Play    | Play from RP     |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | PAUSE       | Prs URI                | Ready   | Return PP        |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | SC:REDIRECT | Terminate-Reason       | Ready   | Set RedP         |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | SC:REDIRECT | No Terminate-Reason    | Init    | Session is       |
   |             | time parameter         |         | removed          |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | Timeout     |                        | Init    |                  |
   |             |                        |         |                  |
   | RedP        |                        | Init    | TEARDOWN of      |
   | reached     |                        |         | session          |
   +-------------+------------------------+---------+------------------+

                          Table 11: State: Ready

   In the Ready state (Table 11), some of the actions depend on the
   number of media streams (NRM) in the session, i.e., aggregated or
   non-aggregated control.  A SETUP request in the Ready state can
   either add one more media stream to the session or, if the media
   stream (same URI) already is part of the session, change the



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 269]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   transport parameters.  TEARDOWN depends on both the Request-URI and
   the number of media streams within the session.  If the Request-URI
   is the presentation URI, the whole session is torn down.  If a media
   URI is used in the TEARDOWN request and more than one media exists in
   the session, the session will remain and a session header is returned
   in the response.  If only a single media stream remains in the
   session when performing a TEARDOWN with a media URI, the session is
   removed.  The number of media streams remaining after tearing down a
   media stream determines the new state.










































Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 270]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   +----------------+-----------------------+--------+-----------------+
   | Action         | Requisite             | New    | Response        |
   |                |                       | State  |                 |
   +----------------+-----------------------+--------+-----------------+
   | PAUSE          | Prs URI               | Ready  | Set RP to       |
   |                |                       |        | present point   |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | End of media   | All media             | Play   | Set RP = End of |
   |                |                       |        | media           |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | End of range   |                       | Play   | Set RP = End of |
   |                |                       |        | range           |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | PLAY           | Prs URI, No range     | Play   | Play from       |
   |                |                       |        | present point   |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | PLAY           | Prs URI, Range        | Play   | According to    |
   |                |                       |        | range           |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | SC:PLAY_NOTIFY |                       | Play   | 200             |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | SETUP          | New URI               | Play   | 455             |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | SETUP          | md URI                | Play   | 455             |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | SETUP          | md URI, IFI           | Play   | Change          |
   |                |                       |        | transport param.|
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | TEARDOWN       | Prs URI               | Init   | No session hdr  |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | TEARDOWN       | md URI,NRM=1          | Init   | No Session hdr, |
   |                |                       |        | NRM=0           |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | TEARDOWN       | md URI                | Play   | 455             |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | SC:REDIRECT    | Terminate Reason with | Play   | Set RedP        |
   |                | Time parameter        |        |                 |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | SC:REDIRECT    |                       | Init   | Session is      |
   |                |                       |        | removed         |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | RedP reached   |                       | Init   | TEARDOWN of     |
   |                |                       |        | session         |
   |                |                       |        |                 |
   | Timeout        |                       | Init   | Stop Media      |
   |                |                       |        | playout         |
   +----------------+-----------------------+--------+-----------------+
                           Table 12: State: Play



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 271]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The Play state table (Table 12) contains a number of requests that
   need a presentation URI (labeled as Prs URI) to work on (i.e., the
   presentation URI has to be used as the Request-URI).  This is due to
   the exclusion of non-aggregated stream control in sessions with more
   than one media stream.

   To avoid inconsistencies between the client and server, automatic
   state transitions are avoided.  This can be seen at, for example, an
   "End of media" event when all media has finished playing but the
   session still remains in Play state.  An explicit PAUSE request needs
   to be sent to change the state to Ready.  It may appear that there
   exist automatic transitions in "RedP reached" and "PP reached".
   However, they are requested and acknowledged before they take place.
   The time at which the transition will happen is known by looking at
   the Terminate-Reason header's time parameter and Range header,
   respectively.  If the client sends a request close in time to these
   transitions, it needs to be prepared for receiving error messages, as
   the state may or may not have changed.

Appendix C.  Media-Transport Alternatives

   This section defines how certain combinations of protocols, profiles,
   and lower transports are used.  This includes the usage of the
   Transport header's source and destination address parameters:
   "src_addr" and "dest_addr".

C.1.  RTP

   This section defines the interaction of RTSP with respect to the RTP
   protocol [RFC3550].  It also defines any necessary media-transport
   signaling with regard to RTP.

   The available RTP profiles and lower-layer transports are described
   below along with rules on signaling the available combinations.

C.1.1.  AVP

   The usage of the "RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with
   Minimal Control" [RFC3551] when using RTP for media transport over
   different lower-layer transport protocols is defined below in regard
   to RTSP.

   One such case is defined within this document: the use of embedded
   (interleaved) binary data as defined in Section 14.  The usage of
   this method is indicated by including the "interleaved" parameter.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 272]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   When using embedded binary data, "src_addr" and "dest_addr" MUST NOT
   be used.  This addressing and multiplexing is used as defined with
   use of channel numbers and the interleaved parameter.

C.1.2.  AVP/UDP

   This part describes the sending of RTP [RFC3550] over lower-
   transport-layer UDP [RFC768] according to the profile "RTP Profile
   for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control" defined in
   [RFC3551].  Implementations of RTP/AVP/UDP MUST implement RTCP
   (Appendix C.1.6).  This profile requires one or two unidirectional or
   bidirectional UDP flows per media stream.  The first UDP flow is for
   RTP and the second is for RTCP.  Multiplexing of RTP and RTCP
   (Appendix C.1.6.4) MAY be used, in which case, a single UDP flow is
   used for both parts.  Embedding of RTP data with the RTSP messages,
   in accordance with Section 14, SHOULD NOT be performed when RTSP
   messages are transported over unreliable transport protocols, like
   UDP [RFC768].

   The RTP/UDP and RTCP/UDP flows can be established using the Transport
   header's "src_addr" and "dest_addr" parameters.

   In RTSP PLAY mode, the transmission of RTP packets from client to
   server is unspecified.  The behavior in regard to such RTP packets
   MAY be defined in future.

   The "src_addr" and "dest_addr" parameters are used in the following
   way for media delivery and playback mode, i.e., Mode=PLAY:

   o  The "src_addr" and "dest_addr" parameters MUST contain either 1 or
      2 address specifications.  Note that two address specifications
      MAY be provided even if RTP and RTCP multiplexing is negotiated.

   o  Each address specification for RTP/AVP/UDP or RTP/AVP/TCP MUST
      contain either:

      *  both an address and a port number, or

      *  a port number without an address.

   o  The first address specification given in either of the parameters
      applies to the RTP stream.  The second specification, if present,
      applies to the RTCP stream, unless in the case RTP and RTCP
      multiplexing is negotiated where both RTP and RTCP will use the
      first specification.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 273]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  The RTP/UDP packets from the server to the client MUST be sent to
      the address and port given by the first address specification of
      the "dest_addr" parameter.

   o  The RTCP/UDP packets from the server to the client MUST be sent to
      the address and port given by the second address specification of
      the "dest_addr" parameter, unless RTP and RTCP multiplexing has
      been negotiated, in which case RTCP MUST be sent to the first
      address specification.  If no second pair is specified and RTP and
      RTCP multiplexing has not been negotiated, RTCP MUST NOT be sent.

   o  The RTCP/UDP packets from the client to the server MUST be sent to
      the address and port given by the second address specification of
      the "src_addr" parameter, unless RTP and RTCP multiplexing has
      been negotiated, in which case RTCP MUST be sent to the first
      address specification.  If no second pair is specified and RTP and
      RTCP multiplexing has not been negotiated, RTCP MUST NOT be sent.

   o  The RTP/UDP packets from the client to the server MUST be sent to
      the address and port given by the first address specification of
      the "src_addr" parameter.

   o  RTP and RTCP packets SHOULD be sent from the corresponding
      receiver port, i.e., RTCP packets from the server should be sent
      from the "src_addr" parameters second address port pair, unless
      RTP and RTCP multiplexing has been negotiated in which case the
      first address port pair is used.

C.1.3.  AVPF/UDP

   The RTP profile "Extended RTP Profile for RTCP-based Feedback (RTP/
   AVPF)" [RFC4585] MAY be used as RTP profiles in sessions using RTP.
   All that is defined for AVP MUST also apply for AVPF.

   The usage of AVPF is indicated by the media initialization protocol
   used.  In the case of SDP, it is indicated by media lines ("m=")
   containing the profile RTP/AVPF.  That SDP MAY also contain further
   AVPF-related SDP attributes configuring the AVPF session regarding
   reporting interval and feedback messages to be used [RFC4585].  This
   configuration MUST be followed.











Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 274]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


C.1.4.  SAVP/UDP

   The RTP profile "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)"
   [RFC3711] is an RTP profile (SAVP) that MAY be used in RTSP sessions
   using RTP.  All that is defined for AVP MUST also apply for SAVP.

   The usage of SRTP requires that a security context be established.
   The default key-management unless otherwise signaled SHALL be MIKEY
   in RSA-R mode as defined in Appendix C.1.4.1 and not according to the
   procedure defined in "Key Management Extensions for Session
   Description Protocol (SDP) and Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)"
   [RFC4567].  The reason is that RFC 4567 sends the initial MIKEY
   message in SDP, thus, both requiring the usage of the DESCRIBE method
   and forcing the server to keep state for clients performing DESCRIBE
   in anticipation that they might require key management.

   MIKEY is selected as the default method for establishing SRTP
   cryptographic context within an RTSP session as it can be embedded in
   the RTSP messages while still ensuring confidentiality of content of
   the keying material, even when using hop-by-hop TLS security for the
   RTSP messages.  This method also supports pipelining of the RTSP
   messages.

C.1.4.1.  MIKEY Key Establishment

   This method for using MIKEY [RFC3830] to establish the SRTP
   cryptographic context is initiated in the client's SETUP request, and
   the server's response to the SETUP carries the MIKEY response.  This
   ensures that the crypto context establishment happens simultaneously
   with the establishment of the media stream being protected.  By using
   MIKEY's RSA-R mode [RFC4738] the client can be the initiator and
   still allow the server to set the parameters in accordance with the
   actual media stream.

   The SRTP cryptographic context establishment is done according to the
   following process:

   1.   The client determines that SAVP or SAVPF shall be used from the
        media-description format, e.g., SDP.  If no other key-management
        method is explicitly signaled, then MIKEY SHALL be used as
        defined herein.  The use of SRTP with RTSP is only defined with
        MIKEY with keys established as defined in this section.  Future
        documents may define how an RTSP implementation treats SDP that
        indicates some other key mechanism to be used.  The need for
        such specification includes [RFC4567], which is not defined for
        use in RTSP 2.0 within this document.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 275]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   2.   The client SHALL establish a TLS connection for RTSP messages,
        directly or hop-by-hop with the server.  If hop-by-hop TLS
        security is used, the User method SHALL be indicated in the
        Accept-Credentials header.  Note that using hop-by-hop does
        allow the proxy to insert itself as a man in the middle.  This
        can also occur in the MIKEY exchange by the proxy providing one
        of its certificates rather than the server's in the Connection-
        Credentials header.  Therefore, the client SHALL validate the
        server certificate.

   3.   The client retrieves the server's certificate from a direct TLS
        connection or hop-by-hop from a Connection-Credentials header.
        The client then checks that the server certificate is valid and
        belongs to the server.

   4.   The client forms the MIKEY Initiator message using RSA-R mode in
        unicast mode as specified in [RFC4738].  The client SHOULD use
        the same certificate for TLS and MIKEY to enable the server to
        bind the two together.  The client's certificate SHALL be
        included in the MIKEY message.  The client SHALL indicate its
        SRTP capabilities in the message.

   5.   The MIKEY message from the previous step is base64-encoded
        [RFC4648] and becomes the value of the MIKEY parameter that is
        included in the transport specification(s) that specifies an
        SRTP-based profile (SAVP, SAVPF) in the SETUP request.

   6.   Any proxy encountering the MIKEY parameter SHALL forward it
        without modification.  A proxy that is required to understand
        the Transport specifications will need to understand SAVP/SAVPF
        with MIKEY to enable the default keying for SRTP-protected media
        streams.  If such a proxy does not support SAVP/SAVPF with
        MIKEY, it will discard the whole transport specification.  Most
        types of proxies can easily support SAVP and SAVPF with MIKEY.
        If a client encounters a proxy not supporting SAVP/SAVPF with
        MIKEY, the client should attempt bypassing that proxy.

   7.   The server, upon receiving the SETUP request, will need to
        decide upon the transport specification to use, if multiple are
        included by the client.  In the determination of which transport
        specifications are supported and preferred, the server SHOULD
        decode the MIKEY message to take the embedded SRTP parameters
        into account.  If all transport spec require SRTP but no MIKEY
        parameter or other supported keying method is included, the
        server SHALL respond with 403 (Forbidden).






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 276]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   8.   Upon generating a response, the following outcomes can occur:

        *  A transport spec not using SRTP and MIKEY is selected.  Thus,
           the response will not contain any MIKEY parameters.

        *  A transport spec using SRTP and MIKEY is selected but an
           error is encountered in the MIKEY processing.  In this case,
           an RTSP error response code of 466 (Key Management Error)
           SHALL be used.  A MIKEY message describing the error MAY be
           included.

        *  A transport spec using SRTP and MIKEY is selected and a MIKEY
           response message can be created.  The server SHOULD use the
           same certificate for TLS and in MIKEY to enable the client to
           bind the two together.  If a different certificate is used,
           it SHALL be included in the MIKEY message.  It is RECOMMENDED
           that the envelope key-cache type be set to 'Cache' and that a
           single envelope key is reused for all MIKEY messages to the
           client.  That message is included in the MIKEY parameter part
           of the single selected transport specification in the SETUP
           response.  The server will set the SRTP parameters as
           preferred for this media stream within the supported range by
           the client.

   9.   The server transmits the SETUP response back to the client.

   10.  The client receives the SETUP response and, if the response code
        indicates a successful request, it decodes the MIKEY message and
        establishes the SRTP cryptographic context from the parameters
        in the MIKEY response.

   In the above method, the client's certificate may be self signed in
   cases where the client's identity is not necessary to authenticate
   and the security goal is only to ensure that the RTSP signaling
   client is the same as the one receiving the SRTP security context.

C.1.5.  SAVPF/UDP

   The RTP profile "Extended Secure RTP Profile for Real-time Transport
   Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/SAVPF)" [RFC5124] is an
   RTP profile (SAVPF) that MAY be used in RTSP sessions using RTP.  All
   that is defined for AVPF MUST also apply for SAVPF.

   The usage of SRTP requires that a cryptographic context be
   established.  The default mechanism for establishing that security
   association is to use MIKEY[RFC3830] with RTSP as defined in
   Appendix C.1.4.1.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 277]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


C.1.6.  RTCP Usage with RTSP

   RTCP has several usages when RTP is implemented for media transport
   as explained below.  Thus, RTCP MUST be supported if an RTSP agent
   handles RTP.

C.1.6.1.  Media Synchronization

   RTCP provides media synchronization and clock-drift compensation.
   The initial media synchronization is available from RTP-Info header.
   However, to be able to handle any clock drift between the media
   streams, RTCP is needed.

C.1.6.2.  RTSP Session Keep-Alive

   RTCP traffic from the RTSP client to the RTSP server MUST function as
   keep-alive.  This requires an RTSP server supporting RTP to use the
   received RTCP packets as indications that the client desires the
   related RTSP session to be kept alive.

C.1.6.3.  Bitrate Adaption

   RTCP Receiver reports and any additional feedback from the client
   MUST be used to adapt the bitrate used over the transport for all
   cases when RTP is sent over UDP.  An RTP sender without reserved
   resources MUST NOT use more than its fair share of the available
   resources.  This can be determined by comparing on short-to-medium
   terms (some seconds) the used bitrate and adapting it so that the RTP
   sender sends at a bitrate comparable to what a TCP sender would
   achieve on average over the same path.

   To ensure that the implementation's adaptation mechanism has a well-
   defined outer envelope, all implementations using a non-congestion-
   controlled unicast transport protocol, like UDP, MUST implement
   "Multimedia Congestion Control: Circuit Breakers for Unicast RTP
   Sessions" [RTP-CIRCUIT-BREAKERS].

C.1.6.4.  RTP and RTCP Multiplexing

   RTSP can be used to negotiate the usage of RTP and RTCP multiplexing
   as described in [RFC5761].  This allows servers and client to reduce
   the amount of resources required for the session by only requiring
   one underlying transport stream per media stream instead of two when
   using RTP and RTCP.  This lessens the server-port consumption and
   also the necessary state and keep-alive work when operating across
   NATs [RFC2663].





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 278]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Content must be prepared with some consideration for RTP and RTCP
   multiplexing, mainly ensuring that the RTP payload types used do not
   collide with the ones used for RTCP packet types.  This option likely
   needs explicit support from the content unless the RTP payload types
   can be remapped by the server and that is correctly reflected in the
   session description.  Beyond that, support of this feature should
   come at little cost and much gain.

   It is recommended that, if the content and server support RTP and
   RTCP multiplexing, this is indicated in the session description, for
   example, using the SDP attribute "a=rtcp-mux".  If the SDP message
   contains the "a=rtcp-mux" attribute for a media stream, the server
   MUST support RTP and RTCP multiplexing.  If indicated or otherwise
   desired by the client, it can include the Transport parameter "RTCP-
   mux" in any transport specification where it desires to use "RTCP-
   mux".  The server will indicate if it supports "RTCP-mux".  Servers
   and Clients SHOULD support RTP and RTCP multiplexing.

   For capability exchange, an RTSP feature tag for RTP and RTCP
   multiplexing is defined: "setup.rtp.rtcp.mux".

   To minimize the risk of negotiation failure while using RTP and RTCP
   multiplexing, some recommendations are here provided.  If the session
   description includes explicit indication of support ("a=rtcp-mux" in
   SDP), then an RTSP agent can safely create a SETUP request with a
   transport specification with only a single "dest_addr" parameter
   address specification.  If no such explicit indication is provided,
   then even if the feature tag "setup.rtp.rtcp.mux" is provided in a
   Supported header by the RTSP server or the feature tag included in
   the Required header in the SETUP request, the media resource may not
   support RTP and RTCP multiplexing.  Thus, to maximize the probability
   of successful negotiation, the RTSP agent is recommended to include
   two "dest_addr" parameter address specifications in the first or
   first set (if pipelining is used) of SETUP request(s) for any media
   resource aggregate.  That way, the RTSP server can accept RTP and
   RTCP multiplexing and only use the first address specification or, if
   not, use both specifications.  The RTSP agent, after having received
   the response for a successful negotiation of the usage of RTP and
   RTCP multiplexing, can then release the resources associated with the
   second address specification.

C.2.  RTP over TCP

   Transport of RTP over TCP can be done in two ways: over independent
   TCP connections using [RFC4571] or interleaved in the RTSP
   connection.  In both cases, the protocol MUST be "rtp" and the lower-
   layer MUST be TCP.  The profile may be any of the above specified
   ones: AVP, AVPF, SAVP, or SAVPF.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 279]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


C.2.1.  Interleaved RTP over TCP

   The use of embedded (interleaved) binary data transported on the RTSP
   connection is possible as specified in Section 14.  When using this
   declared combination of interleaved binary data, the RTSP messages
   MUST be transported over TCP.  TLS may or may not be used.  If TLS is
   used, both RTSP messages and the binary data will be protected by
   TLS.

   One should, however, consider that this will result in all media
   streams going through any proxy.  Using independent TCP connections
   can avoid that issue.

C.2.2.  RTP over Independent TCP

   In this section, the sending of RTP [RFC3550] over lower-layer
   transport TCP [RFC793] according to "Framing Real-time Transport
   Protocol (RTP) and RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Packets over
   Connection-Oriented Transport" [RFC4571] is described.  This section
   adapts the guidelines for using RTP over TCP within SIP/SDP [RFC4145]
   to work with RTSP.

   A client codes the support of RTP over independent TCP by specifying
   an RTP/AVP/TCP transport option without an interleaved parameter in
   the Transport line of a SETUP request.  This transport option MUST
   include the "unicast" parameter.

   If the client wishes to use RTP with RTCP, two address specifications
   need to be included in the "dest_addr" parameter.  If the client
   wishes to use RTP without RTCP, one address specification is included
   in the "dest_addr" parameter.  If the client wishes to multiplex RTP
   and RTCP on a single transport flow (see Appendix C.1.6.4), one or
   two address specifications are included in the "dest_addr" parameter
   in addition to the "RTCP-mux" transport parameter.  Two address
   specifications are allowed to facilitate successful negotiation when
   the server or content can't support RTP and RTCP multiplexing.
   Ordering rules of dest_addr ports follow the rules for RTP/AVP/UDP.

   If the client wishes to play the active role in initiating the TCP
   connection, it MAY set the setup parameter (see Section 18.54) on the
   Transport line to be "active", or it MAY omit the setup parameter, as
   active is the default.  If the client signals the active role, the
   ports in the address specifications in the "dest_addr" parameter MUST
   be set to 9 (the discard port).

   If the client wishes to play the passive role in TCP connection
   initiation, it MUST set the setup parameter on the Transport line to
   be "passive".  If the client is able to assume the active or the



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 280]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   passive role, it MUST set the setup parameter on the Transport line
   to be "actpass".  In either case, the "dest_addr" parameter's address
   specification port value for RTP MUST be set to the TCP port number
   on which the client is expecting to receive the TCP connection for
   RTP, and the "dest_addr" address specification port value for RTCP
   MUST be set to the TCP port number on which the client is expecting
   to receive the TCP connection for RTCP.  In the case that the client
   wishes to multiplex RTP and RTCP on a single transport flow, the
   "RTCP-mux" parameter is included and one or two "dest_addr" parameter
   address specifications are included, as mentioned earlier in this
   section.

   Upon receipt of a non-interleaved RTP/AVP/TCP SETUP request, if a
   server decides to accept this requested option, the 2xx reply MUST
   contain a Transport option that specifies RTP/AVP/TCP (without using
   the interleaved parameter and using the unicast parameter).  The
   "dest_addr" parameter value MUST be echoed from the parameter value
   in the client request unless the destination address (only port) was
   not provided; in which case, the server MAY include the source
   address of the RTSP TCP connection with the port number unchanged.

   In addition, the server reply MUST set the setup parameter on the
   Transport line, to indicate the role the server will play in the
   connection setup.  Permissible values are "active" (if a client set
   setup to "passive" or "actpass") and "passive" (if a client set setup
   to "active" or "actpass").

   If a server sets setup to "passive", the "src_addr" in the reply MUST
   indicate the ports on which the server is willing to receive a TCP
   connection for RTP and (if the client requested a TCP connection for
   RTCP by specifying two "dest_addr" address specifications) a TCP/
   RTCP connection.  If a server sets setup to "active", the ports
   specified in "src_addr" address specifications MUST be set to 9.  The
   server MAY use the "ssrc" parameter, following the guidance in
   Section 18.54.  The server sets only one address specification in the
   case that the client has indicated only a single address
   specification or in case RTP and RTCP multiplexing was requested and
   accepted by the server.  Port ordering for "src_addr" follows the
   rules for RTP/AVP/UDP.

   Servers MUST support taking the passive role and MAY support taking
   the active role.  Servers with a public IP address take the passive
   role, thus enabling clients behind NATs and firewalls a better chance
   of successful connect to the server by actively connecting outwards.
   Therefore, the clients are RECOMMENDED to take the active role.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 281]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   After sending (receiving) a 2xx reply for a SETUP method for a non-
   interleaved RTP/AVP/TCP media stream, the active party SHOULD
   initiate the TCP connection as soon as possible.  The client MUST NOT
   send a PLAY request prior to the establishment of all the TCP
   connections negotiated using SETUP for the session.  In case the
   server receives a PLAY request in a session that has not yet
   established all the TCP connections, it MUST respond using the 464
   (Data Transport Not Ready Yet) (Section 17.4.28) error code.

   Once the PLAY request for a media resource transported over non-
   interleaved RTP/AVP/TCP occurs, media begins to flow from server to
   client over the RTP TCP connection, and RTCP packets flow
   bidirectionally over the RTCP TCP connection.  Unless RTP and RTCP
   multiplexing has been negotiated; in which case, RTP and RTCP will
   flow over a common TCP connection.  As in the RTP/UDP case, client-
   to-server traffic on an RTP-only TCP session is unspecified by this
   memo.  The packets that travel on these connections MUST be framed
   using the protocol defined in [RFC4571], not by the framing defined
   for interleaving RTP over the RTSP connection defined in Section 14.

   A successful PAUSE request for media being transported over RTP/AVP/
   TCP pauses the flow of packets over the connections, without closing
   the connections.  A successful TEARDOWN request signals that the TCP
   connections for RTP and RTCP are to be closed by the RTSP client as
   soon as possible.

   Subsequent SETUP requests using a URI already set up in an RTSP
   session using an RTP/AVP/TCP transport specification may be ambiguous
   in the following way: does the client wish to open up a new TCP
   connection for RTP or RTCP for the URI, or does the client wish to
   continue using the existing TCP connections?  The client SHOULD use
   the "connection" parameter (defined in Section 18.54) on the
   Transport line to make its intention clear (by setting "connection"
   to "new" if new connections are needed, and by setting "connection"
   to "existing" if the existing connections are to be used).  After a
   2xx reply for a SETUP request for a new connection, parties should
   close the preexisting connections, after waiting a suitable period
   for any stray RTP or RTCP packets to arrive.

   The usage of SRTP, i.e., either SAVP or SAVPF profiles, requires that
   a security association be established.  The default mechanism for
   establishing that security association is to use MIKEY[RFC3830] with
   RTSP as defined Appendix C.1.4.1.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 282]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Below, a rewritten version of the example "Media on Demand"
   (Appendix A.1) shows the use of RTP/AVP/TCP non-interleaved:

      C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp RTSP/2.0
            CSeq: 1
            User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

      M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
            CSeq: 1
            Server: PhonyServer/1.0
            Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
            Content-Type: application/sdp
            Content-Length: 227
            Content-Base: rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/
            Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000

            v=0
            o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4 198.51.100.34
            s=RTSP Session
            i=An Example of RTSP Session Usage
            e=adm@example.com
            c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
            a=control: *
            a=range:npt=00:00:00-00:10:34.10
            t=0 0
            m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
            a=control: trackID=1

      C->M: SETUP rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1 RTSP/2.0
            CSeq: 2
            User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
            Require: play.basic
            Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;dest_addr=":9"/":9";
                       setup=active;connection=new
            Accept-Ranges: npt, smpte, clock

      M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
            CSeq: 2
            Server: PhonyServer/1.0
            Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;
                       dest_addr=":9"/":9";
                       src_addr="198.51.100.5:53478"/"198.51.100:54091";
                       setup=passive;connection=new;ssrc=93CB001E
            Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
            Expires: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
            Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
            Accept-Ranges: npt
            Media-Properties: Random-Access=0.8, Immutable, Unlimited



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 283]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      C->M: TCP Connection Establishment x2

      C->M: PLAY rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/ RTSP/2.0
            CSeq: 4
            User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2
            Range: npt=30-
            Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr

      M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
            CSeq: 4
            Server: PhonyServer/1.0
            Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:54 +0000
            Session: OccldOFFq23KwjYpAnBbUr
            Range: npt=30-623.10
            Seek-Style: First-Prior
            RTP-Info:  url="rtsp://example.com/twister.3gp/trackID=1"
               ssrc=4F312DD8:seq=54321;rtptime=2876889

C.3.  Handling Media-Clock Time Jumps in the RTP Media Layer

   RTSP allows media clients to control selected, non-contiguous
   sections of media presentations, rendering those streams with an RTP
   media layer [RFC3550].  Two cases occur, the first is when a new PLAY
   request replaces an old ongoing request and the new request results
   in a jump in the media.  This should produce continuous media stream
   at the RTP layer.  A client may also immediately follow a completed
   PLAY request with a new PLAY request.  This will result in some gap
   in the media layer.  The below text will look into both cases.

   A PLAY request that replaces an ongoing PLAY request allows the media
   layer rendering the RTP stream to do so continuously without being
   affected by jumps in media-clock time.  The RTP timestamps for the
   new media range are set so that they become continuous with the
   previous media range in the previous request.  The RTP sequence
   number for the first packet in the new range will be the next
   following the last packet in the previous range, i.e., monotonically
   increasing.  The goal is to allow the media-rendering layer to work
   without interruption or reconfiguration across the jumps in media
   clock.  This should be possible in all cases of replaced PLAY
   requests for media that has random access properties.  In this case,
   care is needed to align frames or similar media-dependent structures.

   In cases where jumps in media-clock time are a result of RTSP
   signaling operations arriving after a completed PLAY operation, the
   request timing will result in that media becoming non-continuous.
   The server becomes unable to send the media so that it arrives timely
   and still carries timestamps to make the media stream continuous.  In
   these situations, the server will produce RTP streams where there are



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 284]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   gaps in the RTP timeline for the media.  If the media has frame
   structure, aligning the timestamp for the next frame with the
   previous structure reduces the burden to render this media.  The gap
   should represent the time the server hasn't been serving media, e.g.,
   the time between the end of the media stream or a PAUSE request and
   the new PLAY request.  In these cases, the RTP sequence number would
   normally be monotonically increasing across the gap.

   For RTSP sessions with media that lacks random access properties,
   such as live streams, any media-clock jump is commonly the result of
   a correspondingly long pause of delivery.  The RTP timestamp will
   have increased in direct proportion to the duration of the paused
   delivery.  Note also that in this case the RTP sequence number should
   be the next packet number.  If not, the RTCP packet loss reporting
   will indicate as loss all packets not received between the point of
   pausing and later resuming.  This may trigger congestion avoidance
   mechanisms.  An allowed exception from the above recommendation on
   monotonically increasing RTP sequence number is live media streams,
   likely being relayed.  In this case, when the client resumes
   delivery, it will get the media that is currently being delivered to
   the server itself.  For this type of basic delivery of live streams
   to multiple users over unicast, individual rewriting of RTP sequence
   numbers becomes quite a burden.  For solutions that already cache
   media or perform time shifting, the rewriting should impose only a
   minor burden.

   The goal when handling jumps in media-clock time is that the provided
   stream is continuous without gaps in RTP timestamp or sequence
   number.  However, when delivery has been halted for some reason, the
   RTP timestamp, when resuming, MUST represent the duration that the
   delivery was halted.  An RTP sequence number MUST generally be the
   next number, i.e., monotonically increasing modulo 65536.  For media
   resources with the properties Time-Progressing and Time-Duration=0.0,
   the server MAY create RTP media streams with RTP sequence number
   jumps in them due to the client first halting delivery and later
   resuming it (PAUSE and then later PLAY).  However, servers utilizing
   this exception must take into consideration the resulting RTCP
   receiver reports that likely contain loss reports for all the packets
   that were a part of the discontinuity.  A client cannot rely on the
   fact that a server will align when resuming play, even if it is
   RECOMMENDED.  The RTP-Info header will provide information on how the
   server acts in each case.

      One cannot assume that the RTSP client can communicate with the
      RTP media agent, as the two may be independent processes.  If the
      RTP timestamp shows the same gap as the NPT, the media agent will
      assume that there is a pause in the presentation.  If the jump in
      NPT is large enough, the RTP timestamp may roll over and the media



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 285]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      agent may believe later packets to be duplicates of packets just
      played out.  Having the RTP timestamp jump will also affect the
      RTCP measurements based on this.

   As an example, assume an RTP timestamp frequency of 8000 Hz, a
   packetization interval of 100 ms, and an initial sequence number and
   timestamp of zero.

      C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0
        CSeq: 4
        Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
        Range: npt=10-15
        User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

      S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
        CSeq: 4
        Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
        Range: npt=10-15
        RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                  ssrc=0D12F123:seq=0;rtptime=0

   The ensuing RTP data stream is depicted below:


      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 0,  rtptime = 0,     NPT time = 10s
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 1,  rtptime = 800,   NPT time = 10.1s
       . . .
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 49, rtptime = 39200, NPT time = 14.9s


   Upon the completion of the requested delivery, the server sends a
   PLAY_NOTIFY.

        S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0
              CSeq: 5
              Notify-Reason: end-of-stream
              Request-Status: cseq=4 status=200 reason="OK"
              Range: npt=-15
              RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                 ssrc=0D12F123:seq=49;rtptime=39200
              Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK

        C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
              CSeq: 5
              User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   Upon the completion of the play range, the client follows up with a
   request to PLAY from a new NPT.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 286]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 6
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         Range: npt=18-20
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 6
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         Range: npt=18-20
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=50;rtptime=40100

   The ensuing RTP data stream is depicted below:

      S->C: RTP packet - seq = 50, rtptime = 40100, NPT time = 18s
      S->C: RTP packet - seq = 51, rtptime = 40900, NPT time = 18.1s
       . . .
      S->C: RTP packet - seq = 69, rtptime = 55300, NPT time = 19.9s

   In this example, first, NPT 10 through 15 are played, then the client
   requests the server to skip ahead and play NPT 18 through 20.  The
   first segment is presented as RTP packets with sequence numbers 0
   through 49 and timestamps 0 through 39,200.  The second segment
   consists of RTP packets with sequence numbers 50 through 69, with
   timestamps 40,100 through 55,200.  While there is a gap in the NPT,
   there is no gap in the sequence-number space of the RTP data stream.

   The RTP timestamp gap is present in the above example due to the time
   it takes to perform the second play request, in this case, 12.5 ms
   (100/8000).

C.4.  Handling RTP Timestamps after PAUSE

   During a PAUSE/PLAY interaction in an RTSP session, the duration of
   time for which the RTP transmission was halted MUST be reflected in
   the RTP timestamp of each RTP stream.  The duration can be calculated
   for each RTP stream as the time elapsed from when the last RTP packet
   was sent before the PAUSE request was received and when the first RTP
   packet was sent after the subsequent PLAY request was received.  The
   duration includes all latency incurred and processing time required
   to complete the request.

      RFC 3550 [RFC3550] states that: "the RTP timestamp for each unit
      [packet] would be related to the wallclock time at which the unit
      becomes current on the virtual presentation timeline".





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 287]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      In order to satisfy the requirements of [RFC3550], the RTP
      timestamp space needs to increase continuously with real time.
      While this is not optimal for stored media, it is required for RTP
      and RTCP to function as intended.  Using a continuous RTP
      timestamp space allows the same timestamp model for both stored
      and live media and allows better opportunity to integrate both
      types of media under a single control.

   As an example, assume a clock frequency of 8000 Hz, a packetization
   interval of 100 ms, and an initial sequence number and timestamp of
   zero.

   C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 4
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         Range: npt=10-15

         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 4
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         Range: npt=10-15
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=0;rtptime=0

   The ensuing RTP data stream is depicted below:

      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 0, rtptime = 0,    NPT time = 10s
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 1, rtptime = 800,  NPT time = 10.1s
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 2, rtptime = 1600, NPT time = 10.2s
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 3, rtptime = 2400, NPT time = 10.3s



















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 288]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The client then sends a PAUSE request:

   C->S: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 5
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 5
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         Range: npt=10.4-15

   20 seconds elapse and then the client sends a PLAY request.  In
   addition, the server requires 15 ms to process the request:

   C->S: PLAY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 6
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   S->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 6
         Session: ymIqLXufHkMHGdtENdblWK
         Range: npt=10.4-15
         RTP-Info: url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack"
                   ssrc=0D12F123:seq=4;rtptime=164400

   The ensuing RTP data stream is depicted below:

      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 4, rtptime = 164400, NPT time = 10.4s
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 5, rtptime = 165200, NPT time = 10.5s
      S -> C: RTP packet - seq = 6, rtptime = 166000, NPT time = 10.6s

   First, NPT 10 through 10.3 is played, then a PAUSE is received by the
   server.  After 20 seconds, a PLAY is received by the server that
   takes 15 ms to process.  The duration of time for which the session
   was paused is reflected in the RTP timestamp of the RTP packets sent
   after this PLAY request.

   A client can use the RTSP Range header and RTP-Info header to map NPT
   time of a presentation with the RTP timestamp.

   Note: in RFC 2326 [RFC2326], this matter was not clearly defined and
   was misunderstood commonly.  However, for RTSP 2.0, it is expected
   that this will be handled correctly and no exception handling will be
   required.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 289]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Note further: it may be required to reset some of the state to ensure
   the correct media decoding and the usual jitter-buffer handling when
   issuing a PLAY request.

C.5.  RTSP/RTP Integration

   For certain data types, tight integration between the RTSP layer and
   the RTP layer will be necessary.  This by no means precludes the
   above restrictions.  Combined RTSP/RTP media clients should use the
   RTP-Info field to determine whether incoming RTP packets were sent
   before or after a seek or before or after a PAUSE.

C.6.  Scaling with RTP

   For scaling (see Section 18.46), RTP timestamps should correspond to
   the rendering timing.  For example, when playing video recorded at 30
   frames per second at a scale of two and speed (Section 18.50) of one,
   the server would drop every second frame to maintain and deliver
   video packets with the normal timestamp spacing of 3,000 per frame,
   but NPT would increase by 1/15 second for each video frame.

      Note: the above scaling puts requirements on the media codec or a
      media stream to support it.  For example, motion JPEG or other
      non-predictive video coding can easier handle the above example.

C.7.  Maintaining NPT Synchronization with RTP Timestamps

   The client can maintain a correct display of NPT by noting the RTP
   timestamp value of the first packet arriving after repositioning.
   The sequence parameter of the RTP-Info (Section 18.45) header
   provides the first sequence number of the next segment.

C.8.  Continuous Audio

   For continuous audio, the server SHOULD set the RTP marker bit at the
   beginning of serving a new PLAY request or at jumps in timeline.
   This allows the client to perform playout delay adaptation.

C.9.  Multiple Sources in an RTP Session

   Note that more than one SSRC MAY be sent in the media stream.  If it
   happens, all sources are expected to be rendered simultaneously.

C.10.  Usage of SSRCs and the RTCP BYE Message during an RTSP Session

   The RTCP BYE message indicates the end of use of a given SSRC.  If
   all sources leave an RTP session, it can, in most cases, be assumed
   to have ended.  Therefore, a client or server MUST NOT send an RTCP



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 290]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   BYE message until it has finished using a SSRC.  A server SHOULD keep
   using an SSRC until the RTP session is terminated.  Prolonging the
   use of a SSRC allows the established synchronization context
   associated with that SSRC to be used to synchronize subsequent PLAY
   requests even if the PLAY response is late.

   An SSRC collision with the SSRC that transmits media does also have
   consequences, as it will normally force the media sender to change
   its SSRC in accordance with the RTP specification [RFC3550].
   However, an RTSP server may wait and see if the client changes and
   thus resolve the conflict to minimize the impact.  As media sender,
   SSRC change will result in a loss of synchronization context and
   require any receiver to wait for RTCP sender reports for all media
   requiring synchronization before being able to play out synchronized.
   Due to these reasons, a client joining a session should take care not
   to select the same SSRC(s) as the server indicates in the ssrc
   Transport header parameter.  Any SSRC signaled in the Transport
   header MUST be avoided.  A client detecting a collision prior to
   sending any RTP or RTCP messages SHALL also select a new SSRC.

C.11.  Future Additions

   It is the intention that any future protocol or profile regarding
   media delivery and lower transport should be easy to add to RTSP.
   This section provides the necessary steps that need to be met.

   The following things need to be considered when adding a new protocol
   or profile for use with RTSP:

   o  The protocol or profile needs to define a name tag representing
      it.  This tag is required to be an ABNF "token" to be possible to
      use in the Transport header specification.

   o  The useful combinations of protocol, profiles, and lower-layer
      transport for this extension need to be defined.  For each
      combination, declare the necessary parameters to use in the
      Transport header.

   o  For new media protocols, the interaction with RTSP needs to be
      addressed.  One important factor will be the media
      synchronization.  It may be necessary to have new headers similar
      to RTP info to carry this information.

   o  Discussion needs to occur regarding congestion control for media,
      especially if transport without built-in congestion control is
      used.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 291]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   See the IANA Considerations section (Section 22) for information on
   how to register new attributes.

Appendix D.  Use of SDP for RTSP Session Descriptions

   The Session Description Protocol (SDP, [RFC4566]) may be used to
   describe streams or presentations in RTSP.  This description is
   typically returned in reply to a DESCRIBE request on a URI from a
   server to a client or received via HTTP from a server to a client.

   This appendix describes how an SDP file determines the operation of
   an RTSP session.  Thus, it is worth pointing out that the
   interpretation of the SDP is done in the context of the SDP receiver,
   which is the one being configured.  This is the same as in SAP
   [RFC2974]; this differs from SDP Offer/Answer [RFC3264] where each
   SDP is interpreted in the context of the agent providing it.

   SDP as is provides no mechanism by which a client can distinguish,
   without human guidance, between several media streams to be rendered
   simultaneously and a set of alternatives (e.g., two audio streams
   spoken in different languages).  The SDP extension found in "The
   Session Description Protocol (SDP) Grouping Framework" [RFC5888]
   provides such functionality to some degree.  Appendix D.4 describes
   the usage of SDP media line grouping for RTSP.

D.1.  Definitions

   The terms "session-level", "media-level", and other key/attribute
   names and values used in this appendix are to be used as defined in
   SDP [RFC4566]:

D.1.1.  Control URI

   The "a=control" attribute is used to convey the control URI.  This
   attribute is used both for the session and media descriptions.  If
   used for individual media, it indicates the URI to be used for
   controlling that particular media stream.  If found at the session
   level, the attribute indicates the URI for aggregate control
   (presentation URI).  The session-level URI MUST be different from any
   media-level URI.  The presence of a session-level control attribute
   MUST be interpreted as support for aggregated control.  The control
   attribute MUST be present on the media level unless the presentation
   only contains a single media stream; in which case, the attribute MAY
   be present on the session level only and then also apply to that
   single media stream.

   ABNF for the attribute is defined in Section 20.3.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 292]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

     a=control:rtsp://example.com/foo

   This attribute MAY contain either relative or absolute URIs,
   following the rules and conventions set out in RFC 3986 [RFC3986].
   Implementations MUST look for a base URI in the following order:

   1.  the RTSP Content-Base field;

   2.  the RTSP Content-Location field;

   3.  the RTSP Request-URI.

   If this attribute contains only an asterisk (*), then the URI MUST be
   treated as if it were an empty embedded URI; thus, it will inherit
   the entire base URI.

      Note: RFC 2326 was very unclear on the processing of relative URIs
      and several RTSP 1.0 implementations at the point of publishing
      this document did not perform RFC 3986 processing to determine the
      resulting URI; instead, simple concatenation is common.  To avoid
      this issue completely, it is recommended to use absolute URIs in
      the SDP.

   The URI handling for SDPs from container files needs special
   consideration.  For example, let's assume that a container file has
   the URI: "rtsp://example.com/container.mp4".  Let's further assume
   this URI is the base URI and that there is an absolute media-level
   URI: "rtsp://example.com/container.mp4/trackID=2".  A relative media-
   level URI that resolves in accordance with RFC 3986 [RFC3986] to the
   above given media URI is "container.mp4/trackID=2".  It is usually
   not desirable to need to include or modify the SDP stored within the
   container file with the server local name of the container file.  To
   avoid this, one can modify the base URI used to include a trailing
   slash, e.g., "rtsp://example.com/container.mp4/".  In this case, the
   relative URI for the media will only need to be "trackID=2".
   However, this will also mean that using "*" in the SDP will result in
   the control URI including the trailing slash, i.e.,
   "rtsp://example.com/container.mp4/".

      Note: the usage of TrackID in the above is not a standardized
      form, but one example out of several similar strings such as
      TrackID, Track_ID, StreamID that is used by different server
      vendors to indicate a particular piece of media inside a container
      file.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 293]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


D.1.2.  Media Streams

   The "m=" field is used to enumerate the streams.  It is expected that
   all the specified streams will be rendered with appropriate
   synchronization.  If the session is over multicast, the port number
   indicated SHOULD be used for reception.  The client MAY try to
   override the destination port, through the Transport header.  The
   servers MAY allow this: the response will indicate whether or not
   this is allowed.  If the session is unicast, the port numbers are the
   ones RECOMMENDED by the server to the client, about which receiver
   ports to use; the client MUST still include its receiver ports in its
   SETUP request.  The client MAY ignore this recommendation.  If the
   server has no preference, it SHOULD set the port number value to
   zero.

   The "m=" lines contain information about which transport protocol,
   profile, and possibly lower-layer are to be used for the media
   stream.  The combination of transport, profile, and lower layer, like
   RTP/AVP/UDP, needs to be defined for how to be used with RTSP.  The
   currently defined combinations are discussed in Appendix C; further
   combinations MAY be specified.

   Example:

     m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 31

D.1.3.  Payload Type(s)

   The payload type or types are specified in the "m=" line.  In case
   the payload type is a static payload type from RFC 3551 [RFC3551], no
   other information may be required.  In case it is a dynamic payload
   type, the media attribute "rtpmap" is used to specify what the media
   is.  The "encoding name" within the "rtpmap" attribute may be one of
   those specified in [RFC4856], a media type registered with IANA
   according to [RFC4855], or an experimental encoding as specified in
   SDP [RFC4566]).  Codec-specific parameters are not specified in this
   field, but rather in the "fmtp" attribute described below.

   The selection of the RTP payload type numbers used may be required to
   consider RTP and RTCP Multiplexing [RFC5761], if that is to be
   supported by the server.

D.1.4.  Format-Specific Parameters

   Format-specific parameters are conveyed using the "fmtp" media
   attribute.  The syntax of the "fmtp" attribute is specific to the
   encoding(s) to which the attribute refers.  Note that some of the




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 294]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   format-specific parameters may be specified outside of the "fmtp"
   parameters, for example, like the "ptime" attribute for most audio
   encodings.

D.1.5.  Directionality of Media Stream

   The SDP attributes "a=sendrecv", "a=recvonly", and "a=sendonly"
   provide instructions about the direction the media streams flow
   within a session.  When using RTSP, the SDP can be delivered to a
   client using either RTSP DESCRIBE or a number of RTSP external
   methods, like HTTP, FTP, and email.  Based on this, the SDP applies
   to how the RTSP client will see the complete session.  Thus, media
   streams delivered from the RTSP server to the client would be given
   the "a=recvonly" attribute.

   "a=recvonly" in an SDP provided to the RTSP client indicates that
   media delivery will only occur in the direction from the RTSP server
   to the client.  SDP provided to the RTSP client that lacks any of the
   directionality attributes ("a=recvonly", "a=sendonly", "a=sendrecv")
   would be interpreted as having "a=sendrecv".  At the time of writing,
   there exists no RTSP mode suitable for media traffic in the direction
   from the RTSP client to the server.  Thus, all RTSP SDP SHOULD have
   an "a=recvonly" attribute when using the PLAY mode defined in this
   document.  If future modes are defined for media in the client-to-
   server direction, then usage of "a=sendonly" or "a=sendrecv" may
   become suitable to indicate intended media directions.

D.1.6.  Range of Presentation

   The "a=range" attribute defines the total time range of the stored
   session or an individual media.  Live sessions that are not seekable
   can be indicated as specified below; whereas the length of live
   sessions can be deduced from the "t=" and "r=" SDP parameters.

   The attribute is both a session- and a media-level attribute.  For
   presentations that contain media streams of the same duration, the
   range attribute SHOULD only be used at the session level.  In case of
   different lengths, the range attribute MUST be given at media level
   for all media and SHOULD NOT be given at the session level.  If the
   attribute is present at both media level and session level, the
   media-level values MUST be used.

   Note: usually one will specify the same length for all media, even if
   there isn't media available for the full duration on all media.
   However, that requires that the server accept PLAY requests within
   that range.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 295]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Servers MUST take care to provide RTSP Range (see Section 18.40)
   values that are consistent with what is presented in the SDP for the
   content.  There is no reason for non dynamic content, like media
   clips provided on demand to have inconsistent values.  Inconsistent
   values between the SDP and the actual values for the content handled
   by the server is likely to generate some failure, like 457 "Invalid
   Range", in case the client uses PLAY requests with a Range header.
   In case the content is dynamic in length and it is infeasible to
   provide a correct value in the SDP, the server is recommended to
   describe this as content that is not seekable (see below).  The
   server MAY override that property in the response to a PLAY request
   using the correct values in the Range header.

   The unit is specified first, followed by the value range.  The units
   and their values are as defined in Section 4.4.1, Section 4.4.2, and
   Section 4.4.3 and MAY be extended with further formats.  Any open-
   ended range (start-), i.e., without stop range, is of unspecified
   duration and MUST be considered as content that is not seekable
   unless this property is overridden.  Multiple instances carrying
   different clock formats MAY be included at either session or media
   level.

   ABNF for the attribute is defined in Section 20.3.

   Examples:

     a=range:npt=0-34.4368
     a=range:clock=19971113T211503Z-19971113T220300Z
     Non-seekable stream of unknown duration:
     a=range:npt=0-

D.1.7.  Time of Availability

   The "t=" field defines when the SDP is valid.  For on-demand content,
   the server SHOULD indicate a stop time value for which it guarantees
   the description to be valid and a start time that is equal to or
   before the time at which the DESCRIBE request was received.  It MAY
   also indicate start and stop times of 0, meaning that the session is
   always available.

   For sessions that are of live type, i.e., specific start time,
   unknown stop time, likely not seekable, the "t=" and "r=" field
   SHOULD be used to indicate the start time of the event.  The stop
   time SHOULD be given so that the live event will have ended at that
   time, while still not being unnecessary far into the future.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 296]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


D.1.8.  Connection Information

   In SDP used with RTSP, the "c=" field contains the destination
   address for the media stream.  If a multicast address is specified,
   the client SHOULD use this address in any SETUP request as
   destination address, including any additional parameters, such as
   TTL.  For on-demand unicast streams and some multicast streams, the
   destination address MAY be specified by the client via the SETUP
   request, thus overriding any specified address.  To identify streams
   without a fixed destination address, where the client is required to
   specify a destination address, the "c=" field SHOULD be set to a null
   value.  For addresses of type "IP4", this value MUST be "0.0.0.0";
   and for type "IP6", this value MUST be "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0" (can also be
   written as "::"), i.e., the unspecified address according to RFC 4291
   [RFC4291].

D.1.9.  Message Body Tag

   The optional "a=mtag" attribute identifies a version of the session
   description.  It is opaque to the client.  SETUP requests may include
   this identifier in the If-Match field (see Section 18.24) to allow
   session establishment only if this attribute value still corresponds
   to that of the current description.  The attribute value is opaque
   and may contain any character allowed within SDP attribute values.

   ABNF for the attribute is defined in Section 20.3.

   Example:

     a=mtag:"158bb3e7c7fd62ce67f12b533f06b83a"

      One could argue that the "o=" field provides identical
      functionality.  However, it does so in a manner that would put
      constraints on servers that need to support multiple session
      description types other than SDP for the same piece of media
      content.















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 297]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


D.2.  Aggregate Control Not Available

   If a presentation does not support aggregate control, no session-
   level "a=control" attribute is specified.  For an SDP with multiple
   media sections specified, each section will have its own control URI
   specified via the "a=control" attribute.

   Example:

   v=0
   o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4 192.0.2.56
   s=I came from a web page
   e=adm@example.com
   c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
   t=0 0
   m=video 8002 RTP/AVP 31
   a=control:rtsp://audio.example.com/movie.aud
   m=audio 8004 RTP/AVP 3
   a=control:rtsp://video.example.com/movie.vid

   Note that the position of the control URI in the description implies
   that the client establishes separate RTSP control sessions to the
   servers audio.example.com and video.example.com.

   It is recommended that an SDP file contain the complete media-
   initialization information even if it is delivered to the media
   client through non-RTSP means.  This is necessary as there is no
   mechanism to indicate that the client should request more detailed
   media stream information via DESCRIBE.

D.3.  Aggregate Control Available

   In this scenario, the server has multiple streams that can be
   controlled as a whole.  In this case, there are both a media-level
   "a=control" attribute, which is used to specify the stream URIs, and
   a session-level "a=control" attribute, which is used as the Request-
   URI for aggregate control.  If the media-level URI is relative, it is
   resolved to absolute URIs according to Appendix D.1.1 above.













Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 298]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Example:

   C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://example.com/movie RTSP/2.0
         CSeq: 1
         User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2

   M->C: RTSP/2.0 200 OK
         CSeq: 1
         Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:52 +0000
         Expires: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:36:52 +0000
         Content-Type: application/sdp
         Content-Base: rtsp://example.com/movie/
         Content-Length: 227

         v=0
         o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4 192.0.2.211
         s=I contain
         i=<more info>
         e=adm@example.com
         c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
         a=control:*
         t=0 0
         m=video 8002 RTP/AVP 31
         a=control:trackID=1
         m=audio 8004 RTP/AVP 3
         a=control:trackID=2

   In this example, the client is recommended to establish a single RTSP
   session to the server, and it uses the URIs rtsp://example.com/movie/
   trackID=1 and rtsp://example.com/movie/trackID=2 to set up the video
   and audio streams, respectively.  The URI rtsp://example.com/movie/,
   which is resolved from the "*", controls the whole presentation
   (movie).

   A client is not required to issue SETUP requests for all streams
   within an aggregate object.  Servers should allow the client to ask
   for only a subset of the streams.

D.4.  Grouping of Media Lines in SDP

   For some types of media, it is desirable to express a relationship
   between various media components, for instance, for lip
   synchronization or Scalable Video Codec (SVC) [RFC5583].  This
   relationship is expressed on the SDP level by grouping of media
   lines, as described in [RFC5888], and can be exposed to RTSP.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 299]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   For RTSP, it is mainly important to know how to handle grouped media
   received by means of SDP, i.e., if the media are under aggregate
   control (see Appendix D.3) or if aggregate control is not available
   (see Appendix D.2).

   It is RECOMMENDED that grouped media are handled by aggregate
   control, to give the client the ability to control either the whole
   presentation or single media.

D.5.  RTSP External SDP Delivery

   There are some considerations that need to be made when the session
   description is delivered to the client outside of RTSP, for example
   via HTTP or email.

   First of all, the SDP needs to contain absolute URIs, since relative
   will, in most cases, not work as the delivery will not correctly
   forward the base URI.

   The writing of the SDP session availability information, i.e., "t="
   and "r=", needs to be carefully considered.  When the SDP is fetched
   by the DESCRIBE method, the probability that it is valid is very
   high.  However, the same is much less certain for SDPs distributed
   using other methods.  Therefore, the publisher of the SDP should take
   care to follow the recommendations about availability in the SDP
   specification [RFC4566] in Section 4.2.

Appendix E.  RTSP Use Cases

   This appendix describes the most important and considered use cases
   for RTSP.  They are listed in descending order of importance in
   regard to ensuring that all necessary functionality is present.  This
   specification only fully supports usage of the two first.  Also, in
   these first two cases, there are special cases or exceptions that are
   not supported without extensions, e.g., the redirection of media
   delivery to an address other than the controlling agent's (client's).

E.1.  On-Demand Playback of Stored Content

   An RTSP-capable server stores content suitable for being streamed to
   a client.  A client desiring playback of any of the stored content
   uses RTSP to set up the media transport required to deliver the
   desired content.  RTSP is then used to initiate, halt, and manipulate
   the actual transmission (playout) of the content.  RTSP is also
   required to provide the necessary description and synchronization
   information for the content.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 300]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The above high-level description can be broken down into a number of
   functions of which RTSP needs to be capable.

   Presentation Description:  Provide initialization information about
         the presentation (content); for example, which media codecs are
         needed for the content.  Other information that is important
         includes the number of media streams the presentation contains,
         the transport protocols used for the media streams, and
         identifiers for these media streams.  This information is
         required before setup of the content is possible and to
         determine if the client is even capable of using the content.

         This information need not be sent using RTSP; other external
         protocols can be used to transmit the transport presentation
         descriptions.  Two good examples are the use of HTTP [RFC7230]
         or email to fetch or receive presentation descriptions like SDP
         [RFC4566]

   Setup:  Set up some or all of the media streams in a presentation.
         The setup itself consists of selecting the protocol for media
         transport and the necessary parameters for the protocol, like
         addresses and ports.

   Control of Transmission:  After the necessary media streams have been
         established, the client can request the server to start
         transmitting the content.  The client must be allowed to start
         or stop the transmission of the content at arbitrary times.
         The client must also be able to start the transmission at any
         point in the timeline of the presentation.

   Synchronization:  For media-transport protocols like RTP [RFC3550],
         it might be beneficial to carry synchronization information
         within RTSP.  This may be due to either the lack of inter-media
         synchronization within the protocol itself or the potential
         delay before the synchronization is established (which is the
         case for RTP when using RTCP).

   Termination:  Terminate the established contexts.

   For this use case, there are a number of assumptions about how it
   works.  These are:

   On-Demand content:  The content is stored at the server and can be
         accessed at any time during a time period when it is intended
         to be available.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 301]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Independent sessions:  A server is capable of serving a number of
         clients simultaneously, including from the same piece of
         content at different points in that presentations timeline.

   Unicast Transport:  Content for each individual client is transmitted
         to them using unicast traffic.

   It is also possible to redirect the media traffic to a different
   destination than that of the agent controlling the traffic.  However,
   allowing this without appropriate mechanisms for checking that the
   destination approves of this allows for Distributed DoS (DDoS).

E.2.  Unicast Distribution of Live Content

   This use case is similar to the above on-demand content case (see
   Appendix E.1), the difference is the nature of the content itself.
   Live content is continuously distributed as it becomes available from
   a source; i.e., the main difference from on-demand is that one starts
   distributing content before the end of it has become available to the
   server.

   In many cases, the consumer of live content is only interested in
   consuming what actually happens "now"; i.e., very similar to
   broadcast TV.  However, in this case, it is assumed that there exists
   no broadcast or multicast channel to the users, and instead the
   server functions as a distribution node, sending the same content to
   multiple receivers, using unicast traffic between server and client.
   This unicast traffic and the transport parameters are individually
   negotiated for each receiving client.

   Another aspect of live content is that it often has a very limited
   time of availability, as it is only available for the duration of the
   event the content covers.  An example of such live content could be a
   music concert that lasts two hours and starts at a predetermined
   time.  Thus, there is a need to announce when and for how long the
   live content is available.

   In some cases, the server providing live content may be saving some
   or all of the content to allow clients to pause the stream and resume
   it from the paused point, or to "rewind" and play continuously from a
   point earlier than the live point.  Hence, this use case does not
   necessarily exclude playing from other than the live point of the
   stream, playing with scales other than 1.0, etc.








Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 302]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


E.3.  On-Demand Playback Using Multicast

   It is possible to use RTSP to request that media be delivered to a
   multicast group.  The entity setting up the session (the controller)
   will then control when and what media is delivered to the group.
   This use case has some potential for DoS attacks by flooding a
   multicast group.  Therefore, a mechanism is needed to indicate that
   the group actually accepts the traffic from the RTSP server.

   An open issue in this use case is how one ensures that all receivers
   listening to the multicast or broadcast receives the session
   presentation configuring the receivers.  This specification has to
   rely on an external solution to solve this issue.

E.4.  Inviting an RTSP Server into a Conference

   If one has an established conference or group session, it is possible
   to have an RTSP server distribute media to the whole group.
   Transmission to the group is simplest when controlled by a single
   participant or leader of the conference.  Shared control might be
   possible, but would require further investigation and possibly
   extensions.

   This use case assumes that there exists either a multicast or a
   conference focus that redistributes media to all participants.

   This use case is intended to be able to handle the following
   scenario: a conference leader or participant (hereafter called the
   "controller") has some pre-stored content on an RTSP server that he
   wants to share with the group.  The controller sets up an RTSP
   session at the streaming server for this content and retrieves the
   session description for the content.  The destination for the media
   content is set to the shared multicast group or conference focus.
   When desired by the controller, he/she can start and stop the
   transmission of the media to the conference group.

   There are several issues with this use case that are not solved by
   this core specification for RTSP:

   DoS:  To avoid an RTSP server from being an unknowing participant in
         a DoS attack, the server needs to be able to verify the
         destination's acceptance of the media.  Such a mechanism to
         verify the approval of received media does not yet exist;
         instead, only policies can be used, which can be made to work
         in controlled environments.






Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 303]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   Distributing the presentation description to all participants in the
   group:
            To enable a media receiver to correctly decode the content,
            the media configuration information needs to be distributed
            reliably to all participants.  This will most likely require
            support from an external protocol.

      Passing control of the session:  If it is desired to pass control
            of the RTSP session between the participants, some support
            will be required by an external protocol to exchange state
            information and possibly floor control of who is controlling
            the RTSP session.

E.5.  Live Content Using Multicast

   This use case in its simplest form does not require any use of RTSP
   at all; this is what multicast conferences being announced with SAP
   [RFC2974] and SDP are intended to handle.  However, in use cases
   where more advanced features like access control to the multicast
   session are desired, RTSP could be used for session establishment.

   A client desiring to join a live multicasted media session with
   cryptographic (encryption) access control could use RTSP in the
   following way.  The source of the session announces the session and
   gives all interested an RTSP URI.  The client connects to the server
   and requests the presentation description, allowing configuration for
   reception of the media.  In this step, it is possible for the client
   to use secured transport and any desired level of authentication; for
   example, for billing or access control.  An RTSP link also allows for
   load balancing between multiple servers.

   If these were the only goals, they could be achieved by simply using
   HTTP.  However, for cases where the sender likes to keep track of
   each individual receiver of a session, and possibly use the session
   as a side channel for distributing key-updates or other information
   on a per-receiver basis, and the full set of receivers is not known
   prior to the session start, the state establishment that RTSP
   provides can be beneficial.  In this case, a client would establish
   an RTSP session for this multicast group with the RTSP server.  The
   RTSP server will not transmit any media, but instead will point to
   the multicast group.  The client and server will be able to keep the
   session alive for as long as the receiver participates in the session
   thus enabling, for example, the server to push updates to the client.

   This use case will most likely not be able to be implemented without
   some extensions to the server-to-client push mechanism.  Here the
   PLAY_NOTIFY method (see Section 13.5) with a suitable extension could
   provide clear benefits.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 304]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


Appendix F.  Text Format for Parameters

   A resource of type "text/parameters" consists of either 1) a list of
   parameters (for a query) or 2) a list of parameters and associated
   values (for a response or setting of the parameter).  Each entry of
   the list is a single line of text.  Parameters are separated from
   values by a colon.  The parameter name MUST only use US-ASCII visible
   characters while the values are UTF-8 text strings.  The media type
   registration form is in Section 22.16.

   There is a potential interoperability issue for this format.  It was
   named in RFC 2326 but never defined, even if used in examples that
   hint at the syntax.  This format matches the purpose and its syntax
   supports the examples provided.  However, it goes further by allowing
   UTF-8 in the value part; thus, usage of UTF-8 strings may not be
   supported.  However, as individual parameters are not defined, the
   implementing application needs to have out-of-band agreement or using
   feature tag anyway to determine if the endpoint supports the
   parameters.

   The ABNF [RFC5234] grammar for "text/parameters" content is:

   file             = *((parameter / parameter-value) CRLF)
   parameter        = 1*visible-except-colon
   parameter-value  = parameter *WSP ":" value
   visible-except-colon = %x21-39 / %x3B-7E    ; VCHAR - ":"
   value            = *(TEXT-UTF8char / WSP)
   TEXT-UTF8char    = <as defined in Section 20.1>
   WSP              = <See RFC 5234> ; Space or HTAB
   VCHAR            = <See RFC 5234>
   CRLF             = <See RFC 5234>

Appendix G.  Requirements for Unreliable Transport of RTSP

   This appendix provides guidance for those who want to implement RTSP
   messages over unreliable transports as has been defined in RTSP 1.0
   [RFC2326].  RFC 2326 defined the "rtspu" URI scheme and provided some
   basic information for the transport of RTSP messages over UDP.  The
   information is being provided here as there has been at least one
   commercial implementation and compatibility with that should be
   maintained.










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 305]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   The following points should be considered for an interoperable
   implementation:

   o  Requests shall be acknowledged by the receiver.  If there is no
      acknowledgement, the sender may resend the same message after a
      timeout of one round-trip time (RTT).  Any retransmissions due to
      lack of acknowledgement must carry the same sequence number as the
      original request.

   o  The RTT can be estimated as in TCP (RFC 6298) [RFC6298], with an
      initial round-trip value of 500 ms.  An implementation may cache
      the last RTT measurement as the initial value for future
      connections.

   o  The Timestamp header (Section 18.53) is used to avoid the
      retransmission ambiguity problem [Stevens98].

   o  The registered default port for RTSP over UDP for the server is
      554.

   o  RTSP messages can be carried over any lower-layer transport
      protocol that is 8-bit clean.

   o  RTSP messages are vulnerable to bit errors and should not be
      subjected to them.

   o  Source authentication, or at least validation that RTSP messages
      comes from the same entity becomes extremely important, as session
      hijacking may be substantially easier for RTSP message transport
      using an unreliable protocol like UDP than for TCP.

   There are two RTSP headers that are primarily intended for being used
   by the unreliable handling of RTSP messages and which will be
   maintained:

   o  CSeq: See Section 18.20.  It should be noted that the CSeq header
      is also required to match requests and responses independent
      whether a reliable or unreliable transport is used.

   o  Timestamp: See Section 18.53

Appendix H.  Backwards-Compatibility Considerations

   This section contains notes on issues about backwards compatibility
   with clients or servers being implemented according to RFC 2326
   [RFC2326].  Note that there exists no requirement to implement RTSP
   1.0; in fact, this document recommends against it as it is difficult
   to do in an interoperable way.



Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 306]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   A server implementing RTSP 2.0 MUST include an RTSP-Version of
   "RTSP/2.0" in all responses to requests containing RTSP-Version value
   of "RTSP/2.0".  If a server receives an RTSP 1.0 request, it MAY
   respond with an RTSP 1.0 response if it chooses to support RFC 2326.
   If the server chooses not to support RFC 2326, it MUST respond with a
   505 (RTSP Version Not Supported) status code.  A server MUST NOT
   respond to an RTSP 1.0 request with an RTSP 2.0 response.

   Clients implementing RTSP 2.0 MAY use an OPTIONS request with an
   RTSP-Version of "RTSP/2.0" to determine whether a server supports
   RTSP 2.0.  If the server responds with either an RTSP-Version of
   "RTSP/1.0" or a status code of 505 (RTSP Version Not Supported), the
   client will have to use RTSP 1.0 requests if it chooses to support
   RFC 2326.

H.1.  Play Request in Play State

   The behavior in the server when a Play is received in Play state has
   changed (Section 13.4).  In RFC 2326, the new PLAY request would be
   queued until the current Play completed.  Any new PLAY request now
   takes effect immediately replacing the previous request.

H.2.  Using Persistent Connections

   Some server implementations of RFC 2326 maintain a one-to-one
   relationship between a connection and an RTSP session.  Such
   implementations require clients to use a persistent connection to
   communicate with the server and when a client closes its connection,
   the server may remove the RTSP session.  This is worth noting if an
   RTSP 2.0 client also supporting 1.0 connects to a 1.0 server.

Appendix I.  Changes

   This appendix briefly lists the differences between RTSP 1.0
   [RFC2326] and RTSP 2.0 for an informational purpose.  For
   implementers of RTSP 2.0, it is recommended to read carefully through
   this memo and not to rely on the list of changes below to adapt from
   RTSP 1.0 to RTSP 2.0, as RTSP 2.0 is not intended to be backwards
   compatible with RTSP 1.0 [RFC2326] other than the version negotiation
   mechanism.











Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 307]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


I.1.  Brief Overview

   The following protocol elements were removed in RTSP 2.0 compared to
   RTSP 1.0:

   o  the RECORD and ANNOUNCE methods and all related functionality
      (including 201 (Created) and 250 (Low On Storage Space) status
      codes);

   o  the use of UDP for RTSP message transport (due to missing interest
      and to broken specification);

   o  the use of PLAY method for keep-alive in Play state.

   The following protocol elements were added or changed in RTSP 2.0
   compared to RTSP 1.0:

   o  RTSP session TEARDOWN from the server to the client;

   o  IPv6 support;

   o  extended IANA registries (e.g., transport headers parameters,
      transport-protocol, profile, lower-transport, and mode);

   o  request pipelining for quick session start-up;

   o  fully reworked state machine;

   o  RTSP messages now use URIs rather than URLs;

   o  incorporated much of related HTTP text ([RFC2616]) in this memo,
      compared to just referencing the sections in HTTP, to avoid
      ambiguities;

   o  the REDIRECT method was expanded and diversified for different
      situations;

   o  Includes a new section about how to set up different media-
      transport alternatives and their profiles in addition to lower-
      layer protocols.  This caused the appendix on RTP interaction to
      be moved to the new section instead of being in the part that
      describes RTP.  The section also includes guidelines what to
      consider when writing usage guidelines for new protocols and
      profiles;







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 308]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


   o  Added an asynchronous notification method PLAY_NOTIFY.  This
      method is used by the RTSP server to asynchronously notify clients
      about session changes while in Play state.  To a limited extent,
      this is comparable with some implementations of ANNOUNCE in RTSP
      1.0 not intended for Recording.

I.2.  Detailed List of Changes

   The below changes have been made to RTSP 1.0 (RFC 2326) when defining
   RTSP 2.0.  Note that this list does not reflect minor changes in
   wording or correction of typographical errors.

   o  The section on minimal implementation was deleted.  Instead, the
      main part of the specification defines the core of RTSP 2.0.

   o  The Transport header has been changed in the following ways:

      *  The ABNF has been changed to define that extensions are
         possible and that unknown parameters result in servers ignoring
         the transport specification.

      *  To prevent backwards compatibility issues, any extension or new
         parameter requires the usage of a feature tag combined with the
         Require header.

      *  Syntax ambiguities with the Mode parameter have been resolved.

      *  Syntax error with ";" for multicast and unicast has been
         resolved.

      *  Two new addressing parameters have been defined: src_addr and
         dest_addr.  These replace the parameters "port", "client_port",
         "server_port", "destination", and "source".

      *  Support for IPv6 explicit addresses in all address fields has
         been included.

      *  To handle URI definitions that contain ";" or ",", a quoted-URI
         format has been introduced and is required.

      *  IANA registries for the transport header parameters, transport-
         protocol, profile, lower-transport, and mode have been defined.

      *  The Transport header's interleaved parameter's text was made
         more strict and uses formal requirements levels.  It was also
         clarified that the interleaved channels are symmetric and that
         it is the server that sets the channel numbers.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 309]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      *  It has been clarified that the client can't request of the
         server to use a certain RTP SSRC, using a request with the
         transport parameter SSRC.

      *  Syntax definition for SSRC has been clarified to require 8HEX.
         It has also been extended to allow multiple values for clients
         supporting this version.

      *  Clarified the text on the Transport header's "dest_addr"
         parameters regarding what security precautions the server is
         required to perform.

   o  The Range formats have been changed in the following way:

      *  The NPT format has been given an initial NPT identifier that
         must now be used.

      *  All formats now support initial open-ended formats of type
         "npt=-10" and also format only "Range: smpte" ranges for usage
         with GET_PARAMETER requests.

      *  The npt-hhmmss notation now follows ISO 8601 more strictly.

   o  RTSP message handling has been changed in the following ways:

      *  RTSP messages now use URIs rather than URLs.

      *  It has been clarified that a 4xx message due to a missing CSeq
         header shall be returned without a CSeq header.

      *  The 300 (Multiple Choices) response code has been removed.

      *  Rules for how to handle the timing out RTSP messages have been
         added.

      *  Extended Pipelining rules allowing for quick session startup.

      *  Sequence numbering and proxy handling of sequence numbers have
         been defined, including cases when responses arrive out of
         order.

   o  The HTTP references have been updated to first RFCs 2616 and 2617
      and then to RFC 7230-7235.  Most of the text has been copied and
      then altered to fit RTSP into this specification.  The Public and
      the Content-Base headers have also been imported from RFC 2068 so
      that they are defined in the RTSP specification.  Known effects on
      RTSP due to HTTP clarifications:




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 310]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      *  Content-Encoding header can include encoding of type
         "identity".

   o  The state machine section has been completely rewritten.  It now
      includes more details and is also more clear about the model used.

   o  An IANA section has been included that contains a number of
      registries and their rules.  This will allow us to use IANA to
      keep track of RTSP extensions.

   o  The transport of RTSP messages has seen the following changes:

      *  The use of UDP for RTSP message transport has been deprecated
         due to missing interest and to broken specification.

      *  The rules for how TCP connections are to be handled have been
         clarified.  Now it is made clear that servers should not close
         the TCP connection unless they have been unused for significant
         time.

      *  Strong recommendations why servers and clients should use
         persistent connections have also been added.

      *  There is now a requirement on the servers to handle non-
         persistent connections as this provides fault tolerance.

      *  Added wording on the usage of Connection:Close for RTSP.

      *  Specified usage of TLS for RTSP messages, including a scheme to
         approve a proxy's TLS connection to the next hop.

   o  The following header-related changes have been made:

      *  Accept-Ranges response-header has been added.  This header
         clarifies which range formats can be used for a resource.

      *  Fixed the missing definitions for the Cache-Control header.
         Also added to the syntax definition the missing delta-seconds
         for max-stale and min-fresh parameters.

      *  Put requirement on CSeq header that the value is increased by
         one for each new RTSP request.  A recommendation to start at 0
         has also been added.

      *  Added a requirement that the Date header must be used for all
         messages with a message body and the Server should always
         include it.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 311]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      *  Removed the possibility of using Range header with Scale header
         to indicate when it is to be activated, since it can't work as
         defined.  Also, added a rule that lack of Scale header in a
         response indicates lack of support for the header.  feature
         tags for scaled playback have been defined.

      *  The Speed header must now be responded to in order to indicate
         support and the actual speed going to be used.  A feature tag
         is defined.  Notes on congestion control were also added.

      *  The Supported header was borrowed from SIP [RFC3261] to help
         with the feature negotiation in RTSP.

      *  Clarified that the Timestamp header can be used to resolve
         retransmission ambiguities.

      *  The Session header text has been expanded with an explanation
         on keep-alive and which methods to use.  SET_PARAMETER is now
         recommended to use if only keep-alive within RTSP is desired.

      *  It has been clarified how the Range header formats are used to
         indicate pause points in the PAUSE response.

      *  Clarified that RTP-Info URIs that are relative use the Request-
         URI as base URI.  Also clarified that the used URI must be the
         one that was used in the SETUP request.  The URIs are now also

         required to be quoted.  The header also expresses the SSRC for
         the provided RTP timestamp and sequence number values.

      *  Added text that requires the Range to always be present in PLAY
         responses.  Clarified what should be sent in case of live
         streams.

      *  The headers table has been updated using a structure borrowed
         from SIP.  Those tables convey much more information and should
         provide a good overview of the available headers.

      *  It has been clarified that any message with a message body is
         required to have a Content-Length header.  This was the case in
         RFC 2326, but could be misinterpreted.

      *  ETag has changed its name to MTag.

      *  To resolve functionality around MTag, the MTag and If-None-
         Match header have been added from HTTP with necessary
         clarification in regard to RTSP operation.




Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 312]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      *  Imported the Public header from HTTP (RFC 2068 [RFC2068]) since
         it has been removed from HTTP due to lack of use.  Public is
         used quite frequently in RTSP.

      *  Clarified rules for populating the Public header so that it is
         an intersection of the capabilities of all the RTSP agents in a
         chain.

      *  Added the Media-Range header for listing the current
         availability of the media range.

      *  Added the Notify-Reason header for giving the reason when
         sending PLAY_NOTIFY requests.

      *  A new header Seek-Style has been defined to direct and inform
         how any seek operation should/have been performed.

   o  The Protocol Syntax has been changed in the following way:

      *  All ABNF definitions are updated according to the rules defined
         in RFC 5234 [RFC5234] and have been gathered in a separate
         section (Section 20).

      *  The ABNF for the User-Agent and Server headers have been
         corrected.

      *  Some definitions in the introduction regarding the RTSP session
         have been changed.

      *  The protocol has been made fully IPv6 capable.

      *  The CHAR rule has been changed to exclude NULL.

   o  The Status codes have been changed in the following ways:

      *  The use of status code 303 (See Other) has been deprecated as
         it does not make sense to use in RTSP.

      *  The never-defined status code 411 "Length Required" has been
         completely removed.

      *  When sending response 451 (Parameter Not Understood) and 458
         (Parameter Is Read-Only), the response body should contain the
         offending parameters.







Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 313]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      *  Clarification on when a 3rr redirect status code can be
         received has been added.  This includes receiving 3rr as a
         result of a request within an established session.  This
         provides clarification to a previous unspecified behavior.

      *  Removed the 201 (Created) and 250 (Low On Storage Space) status
         codes as they are only relevant to recording, which is
         deprecated.

      *  Several new status codes have been defined: 464 (Data Transport
         Not Ready Yet), 465 (Notification Reason Unknown), 470
         (Connection Authorization Required), 471 (Connection
         Credentials Not Accepted), and 472 (Failure to Establish Secure
         Connection).

   o  The following functionality has been deprecated from the protocol:

      *  The use of Queued Play.

      *  The use of PLAY method for keep-alive in Play state.

      *  The RECORD and ANNOUNCE methods and all related functionality.
         Some of the syntax has been removed.

      *  The possibility to use timed execution of methods with the time
         parameter in the Range header.

      *  The description on how rtspu works is not part of the core
         specification and will require external description.  Only that
         it exists is mentioned here and some requirements for the
         transport are provided.

   o  The following changes have been made in relation to methods:

      *  The OPTIONS method has been clarified with regard to the use of
         the Public and Allow headers.

      *  Added text clarifying the usage of SET_PARAMETER for keep-alive
         and usage without a body.

      *  PLAY method is now allowed to be pipelined with the pipelining
         of one or more SETUP requests following the initial that
         generates the session for aggregated control.

      *  REDIRECT has been expanded and diversified for different
         situations.





Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 314]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


      *  Added a new method PLAY_NOTIFY.  This method is used by the
         RTSP server to asynchronously notify clients about session
         changes.

   o  Wrote a new section about how to set up different media-transport
      alternatives and their profiles as well as lower-layer protocols.
      This caused the appendix on RTP interaction to be moved to the new
      section instead of being in the part that describes RTP.  The new
      section also includes guidelines what to consider when writing
      usage guidelines for new protocols and profiles.

   o  Setup and usage of independent TCP connections for transport of
      RTP has been specified.

   o  Added a new section describing the available mechanisms to
      determine if functionality is supported, called "Capability
      Handling".  Renamed option-tags to feature tags.

   o  Added a Contributors section with people who have contributed
      actual text to the specification.

   o  Added a section "Use Cases" that describes the major use cases for
      RTSP.

   o  Clarified the usage of a=range and how to indicate live content
      that are not seekable with this header.

   o  Text specifying the special behavior of PLAY for live content.

   o  Security features of RTSP have been clarified:

      *  HTTP-based authorization has been clarified requiring both
         Basic and Digest support

      *  TLS support has been mandated

      *  If one implements RTP, then SRTP and defined MIKEY-based key-
         exchange must be supported

      *  Various minor mitigations discussed or resulted in protocol
         changes.










Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 315]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


Acknowledgements

   This memorandum defines RTSP version 2.0, which is a revision of the
   Proposed Standard RTSP version 1.0 defined in [RFC2326].  The authors
   of RFC 2326 are Henning Schulzrinne, Anup Rao, and Robert Lanphier.

   Both RTSP version 1.0 and RTSP version 2.0 borrow format and
   descriptions from HTTP/1.1.

   Robert Sparks and especially Elwyn Davies provided very valuable and
   detailed reviews in the IETF Last Call that greatly improved the
   document and resolved many issues, especially regarding consistency.

   This document has benefited greatly from the comments of all those
   participating in the MMUSIC WG.  In addition to those already
   mentioned, the following individuals have contributed to this
   specification:

   Rahul Agarwal, Claudio Allocchio, Jeff Ayars, Milko Boic, Torsten
   Braun, Brent Browning, Bruce Butterfield, Steve Casner, Maureen
   Chesire, Jinhang Choi, Francisco Cortes, Elwyn Davies, Spencer
   Dawkins, Kelly Djahandari, Martin Dunsmuir, Adrian Farrel, Stephen
   Farrell, Ross Finlayson, Eric Fleischman, Jay Geagan, Andy Grignon,
   Christian Groves, V.  Guruprasad, Peter Haight, Mark Handley, Brad
   Hefta-Gaub, Volker Hilt, John K.  Ho, Patrick Hoffman, Go Hori,
   Philipp Hoschka, Anne Jones, Ingemar Johansson, Jae-Hwan Kim, Anders
   Klemets, Ruth Lang, Barry Leiba, Stephanie Leif, Jonathan Lennox,
   Eduardo F.  Llach, Chris Lonvick, Xavier Marjou, Thomas Marshall, Rob
   McCool, Martti Mela, David Oran, Joerg Ott, Joe Pallas, Maria
   Papadopouli, Sujal Patel, Ema Patki, Alagu Periyannan, Colin Perkins,
   Pekka Pessi, Igor Plotnikov, Pete Resnick, Peter Saint-Andre, Holger
   Schmidt, Jonathan Sergent, Pinaki Shah, David Singer, Lior Sion, Jeff
   Smith, Alexander Sokolsky, Dale Stammen, John Francis Stracke, Geetha
   Srikantan, Scott Taylor, David Walker, Stephan Wenger, Dale R.
   Worley, and Byungjo Yoon, and especially Flemming Andreasen.
















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 316]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


Contributors

   The following people have made written contributions that were
   included in the specification:

   o  Tom Marshall contributed text on the usage of 3rr status codes.

   o  Thomas Zheng contributed text on the usage of the Range in PLAY
      responses and proposed an earlier version of the PLAY_NOTIFY
      method.

   o  Sean Sheedy contributed text on the timeout behavior of RTSP
      messages and connections, the 463 (Destination Prohibited) status
      code, and proposed an earlier version of the PLAY_NOTIFY method.

   o  Greg Sherwood proposed an earlier version of the PLAY_NOTIFY
      method.

   o  Fredrik Lindholm contributed text about the RTSP security
      framework.

   o  John Lazzaro contributed the text for RTP over Independent TCP.

   o  Aravind Narasimhan contributed by rewriting "Media-Transport
      Alternatives" (Appendix C) and making editorial improvements on a
      number of places in the specification.

   o  Torbjorn Einarsson has done some editorial improvements of the
      text.






















Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 317]
^L
RFC 7826                        RTSP 2.0                   December 2016


Authors' Addresses

   Henning Schulzrinne
   Columbia University
   1214 Amsterdam Avenue
   New York, NY  10027
   United States of America

   Email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu


   Anup Rao
   Cisco
   United States of America

   Email: anrao@cisco.com


   Rob Lanphier
   San Francisco, CA
   United States of America

   Email: robla@robla.net


   Magnus Westerlund
   Ericsson
   Faeroegatan 2
   Stockholm  SE-164 80
   Sweden

   Email: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com


   Martin Stiemerling (editor)
   University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt
   Haardtring 100
   64295 Darmstadt
   Germany

   Email: mls.ietf@gmail.com
   URI:   http://www.stiemerling.org









Schulzrinne, et al.          Standards Track                  [Page 318]
^L