summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt4819
1 files changed, 4819 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0a55af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,4819 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. Reynolds
+Request for Comments: 1060 J. Postel
+Obsoletes RFCs: 1010, 990, 960, 943, 923, 900, 870, ISI
+820, 790, 776, 770, 762, 758,755, 750, 739, 604, March 1990
+503, 433, 349
+Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93
+
+ ASSIGNED NUMBERS
+
+STATUS OF THIS MEMO
+
+ This memo is a status report on the parameters (i.e., numbers and
+ keywords) used in protocols in the Internet community. Distribution
+ of this memo is unlimited.
+
+ Table of Contents
+
+INTRODUCTION.................................................... 2
+Data Notations.................................................. 3
+Special Addresses............................................... 4
+VERSION NUMBERS................................................. 6
+PROTOCOL NUMBERS................................................ 7
+PORT NUMBERS.................................................... 9
+UNIX PORTS......................................................13
+INTERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES....................................19
+IANA ETHERNET ADDRESS BLOCK.....................................20
+IP TOS PARAMETERS...............................................21
+IP TIME TO LIVE PARAMETER.......................................23
+DOMAIN SYSTEM PARAMETERS........................................24
+BOOTP PARAMETERS................................................25
+NETWORK MANAGEMENT PARAMETERS...................................26
+ARPANET AND MILNET LOGICAL ADDRESSES............................30
+ARPANET AND MILNET LINK NUMBERS.................................31
+ARPANET AND MILNET X. 25 ADDRESS MAPPINGS.......................32
+IEEE 802 NUMBERS OF INTEREST....................................34
+ETHERNET NUMBERS OF INTEREST....................................35
+ETHERNET VENDOR ADDRESS COMPONENTS..............................38
+ETHERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES....................................41
+XNS PROTOCOL TYPES..............................................43
+PROTOCOL/TYPE FIELD ASSIGNMENTS.................................44
+PRONET 80 TYPE NUMBERS..........................................45
+ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL PARAMETERS..........................46
+REVERSE ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL OPERATION CODES.............47
+DYNAMIC REVERSE ARP.............................................47
+X.25 TYPE NUMBERS...............................................48
+PUBLIC DATA NETWORK NUMBERS.....................................49
+TELNET OPTIONS..................................................51
+MAIL ENCRYPTION TYPES...........................................52
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+MACHINE NAMES...................................................53
+SYSTEM NAMES....................................................57
+PROTOCOL AND SERVICE NAMES......................................58
+TERMINAL TYPE NAMES.............................................62
+DOCUMENTS.......................................................65
+PEOPLE..........................................................76
+Security Considerations.........................................86
+Authors' Addresses..............................................86
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+ This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the
+ currently assigned values from several series of numbers used in
+ network protocol implementations. This RFC will be updated
+ periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from
+ the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). If you are developing
+ a protocol or application that will require the use of a link, socket,
+ port, protocol, etc., please contact the IANA to receive a number
+ assignment.
+
+ Joyce K. Reynolds
+ Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
+ USC - Information Sciences Institute
+ 4676 Admiralty Way
+ Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695
+
+ Phone: (213) 822-1511
+
+ Electronic mail: JKREY@ISI.EDU
+
+ Most of the protocols mentioned here are documented in the RFC series
+ of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further
+ information on protocols can be found in the memo "Official Internet
+ Protocols" [118]. The more prominent and more generally used are
+ documented in the "DDN Protocol Handbook, Volume Two, DARPA Internet
+ Protocols" [45] prepared by the NIC. Other collections of older or
+ obsolete protocols are contained in the "Internet Protocol Transition
+ Workbook" [76], or in the "ARPANET Protocol Transition Handbook"
+ [47]. For further information on ordering the complete 1985 DDN
+ Protocol Handbook, write: SRI International (SRI-NIC), DDN Network
+ Information Center, Room EJ291, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park,
+ CA., 94025; or call: 1-800-235-3155. Also, the Internet Activities
+ Board (IAB) publishes the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" [62],
+ which describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the
+ Internet. This document is issued quarterly. Current copies may be
+ obtained from the DDN Network Information Center or from the IANA.
+
+ In the entries below, the name and mailbox of the responsible
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ individual is indicated. The bracketed entry, e.g., [nn,iii], at the
+ right hand margin of the page indicates a reference for the listed
+ protocol, where the number ("nn") cites the document and the letters
+ ("iii") cites the person. Whenever possible, the letters are a NIC
+ Ident as used in the WhoIs (NICNAME) service.
+
+Data Notations
+
+ The convention in the documentation of Internet Protocols is to
+ express numbers in decimal and to picture data in "big-endian" order
+ [21]. That is, fields are described left to right, with the most
+ significant octet on the left and the least significant octet on the
+ right.
+
+ The order of transmission of the header and data described in this
+ document is resolved to the octet level. Whenever a diagram shows a
+ group of octets, the order of transmission of those octets is the
+ normal order in which they are read in English. For example, in the
+ following diagram the octets are transmitted in the order they are
+ numbered.
+
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+
+ Transmission Order of Bytes
+
+ Whenever an octet represents a numeric quantity the left most bit in
+ the diagram is the high order or most significant bit. That is, the
+ bit labeled 0 is the most significant bit. For example, the
+ following diagram represents the value 170 (decimal).
+
+
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ |1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0|
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+
+ Significance of Bits
+
+ Similarly, whenever a multi-octet field represents a numeric quantity
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 3]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ the left most bit of the whole field is the most significant bit.
+ When a multi-octet quantity is transmitted the most significant octet
+ is transmitted first.
+
+Special Addresses:
+
+ There are five classes of IP addresses: Class A through Class E
+ [119]. Of these, Class D and Class E addresses are reserved for
+ experimental use. A gateway which is not participating in these
+ experiments must ignore all datagrams with a Class D or Class E
+ destination IP address. ICMP Destination Unreachable or ICMP
+ Redirect messages must not result from receiving such datagrams.
+
+ There are certain special cases for IP addresses [11]. These special
+ cases can be concisely summarized using the earlier notation for an
+ IP address:
+
+ IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Host-number> }
+
+ or
+
+ IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Subnet-number>,
+ <Host-number> }
+
+ if we also use the notation "-1" to mean the field contains all 1
+ bits. Some common special cases are as follows:
+
+ (a) {0, 0}
+
+ This host on this network. Can only be used as a source
+ address (see note later).
+
+ (b) {0, <Host-number>}
+
+ Specified host on this network. Can only be used as a
+ source address.
+
+ (c) { -1, -1}
+
+ Limited broadcast. Can only be used as a destination
+ address, and a datagram with this address must never be
+ forwarded outside the (sub-)net of the source.
+
+ (d) {<Network-number>, -1}
+
+ Directed broadcast to specified network. Can only be used
+ as a destination address.
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 4]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ (e) {<Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, -1}
+
+ Directed broadcast to specified subnet. Can only be used as
+ a destination address.
+
+ (f) {<Network-number>, -1, -1}
+
+ Directed broadcast to all subnets of specified subnetted
+ network. Can only be used as a destination address.
+
+ (g) {127, <any>}
+
+ Internal host loopback address. Should never appear outside
+ a host.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 5]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ VERSION NUMBERS
+
+ In the Internet Protocol (IP) [45,105] there is a field to identify
+ the version of the internetwork general protocol. This field is 4
+ bits in size.
+
+ Assigned Internet Version Numbers
+
+ Decimal Keyword Version References
+ ------- ------- ------- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JBP]
+ 1-3 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 4 IP Internet Protocol [105,JBP]
+ 5 ST ST Datagram Mode [49,JWF]
+ 6-14 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 15 Reserved [JBP]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 6]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PROTOCOL NUMBERS
+
+ In the Internet Protocol (IP) [45,105] there is a field, called
+ Protocol, to identify the the next level protocol. This is an 8 bit
+ field.
+
+ Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers
+
+ Decimal Keyword Protocol References
+ ------- ------- -------- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JBP]
+ 1 ICMP Internet Control Message [97,JBP]
+ 2 IGMP Internet Group Management [43,JBP]
+ 3 GGP Gateway-to-Gateway [60,MB]
+ 4 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 5 ST Stream [49,JWF]
+ 6 TCP Transmission Control [106,JBP]
+ 7 UCL UCL [PK]
+ 8 EGP Exterior Gateway Protocol [123,DLM1]
+ 9 IGP any private interior gateway [JBP]
+ 10 BBN-RCC-MON BBN RCC Monitoring [SGC]
+ 11 NVP-II Network Voice Protocol [22,SC3]
+ 12 PUP PUP [8,XEROX]
+ 13 ARGUS ARGUS [RWS4]
+ 14 EMCON EMCON [BN7]
+ 15 XNET Cross Net Debugger [56,JFH2]
+ 16 CHAOS Chaos [NC3]
+ 17 UDP User Datagram [104,JBP]
+ 18 MUX Multiplexing [23,JBP]
+ 19 DCN-MEAS DCN Measurement Subsystems [DLM1]
+ 20 HMP Host Monitoring [59,RH6]
+ 21 PRM Packet Radio Measurement [ZSU]
+ 22 XNS-IDP XEROX NS IDP [133,XEROX]
+ 23 TRUNK-1 Trunk-1 [BWB6]
+ 24 TRUNK-2 Trunk-2 [BWB6]
+ 25 LEAF-1 Leaf-1 [BWB6]
+ 26 LEAF-2 Leaf-2 [BWB6]
+ 27 RDP Reliable Data Protocol [138,RH6]
+ 28 IRTP Internet Reliable Transaction [79,TXM]
+ 29 ISO-TP4 ISO Transport Protocol Class 4 [63,RC77]
+ 30 NETBLT Bulk Data Transfer Protocol [20,DDC1]
+ 31 MFE-NSP MFE Network Services Protocol [124,BCH2]
+ 32 MERIT-INP MERIT Internodal Protocol [HWB]
+ 33 SEP Sequential Exchange Protocol [JC120]
+ 34 3PC Third Party Connect Protocol [SAF3]
+ 35-60 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 61 any host internal protocol [JBP]
+ 62 CFTP CFTP [50,HCF2]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 7]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 63 any local network [JBP]
+ 64 SAT-EXPAK SATNET and Backroom EXPAK [SHB]
+ 65 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 66 RVD MIT Remote Virtual Disk Protocol [MBG]
+ 67 IPPC Internet Pluribus Packet Core [SHB]
+ 68 any distributed file system [JBP]
+ 69 SAT-MON SATNET Monitoring [SHB]
+ 70 VISA VISA Protocol [GXT1]
+ 71 IPCV Internet Packet Core Utility [SHB]
+ 72-75 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 76 BR-SAT-MON Backroom SATNET Monitoring [SHB]
+ 77 SUN-ND SUN ND PROTOCOL-Temporary [WM3]
+ 78 WB-MON WIDEBAND Monitoring [SHB]
+ 79 WB-EXPAK WIDEBAND EXPAK [SHB]
+ 80 ISO-IP ISO Internet Protocol [MTR]
+ 81 VMTP VMTP [DRC3]
+ 82 SECURE-VMTP SECURE-VMTP [DRC3]
+ 83 VINES VINES [BXH]
+ 84 TTP TTP [JXS]
+ 85 NSFNET-IGP NSFNET-IGP [HWB]
+ 86 DGP Dissimilar Gateway Protocol [74,ML109]
+ 87 TCF TCF [GAL5]
+ 88 IGRP IGRP [18,GXS]
+ 89 OSPFIGP OSPFIGP [83,JTM4]
+ 90 Sprite-RPC Sprite RPC Protocol [143,BXW]
+ 91 LARP Locus Address Resolution Protocol [BXH]
+ 92-254 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 255 Reserved [JBP]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 8]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PORT NUMBERS
+
+Ports are used in the TCP [45,106] to name the ends of logical
+connections which carry long term conversations. For the purpose of
+providing services to unknown callers, a service contact port is
+defined. This list specifies the port used by the server process as its
+contact port. The contact port is sometimes called the "well-known
+port".
+
+To the extent possible, these same port assignments are used with the
+UDP [46,104].
+
+To the extent possible, these same port assignments are used with the
+ISO-TP4 [64].
+
+The assigned ports use a small portion of the possible port numbers.
+The assigned ports have all except the low order eight bits cleared to
+zero. The low order eight bits are specified here.
+
+ Port Assignments:
+
+ Decimal Keyword Description References
+ ------- ------- ----------- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JBP]
+ 1 TCPMUX TCP Port Service Multiplexer [MKL]
+ 2-4 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 5 RJE Remote Job Entry [12,JBP]
+ 7 ECHO Echo [95,JBP]
+ 9 DISCARD Discard [94,JBP]
+ 11 USERS Active Users [89,JBP]
+ 13 DAYTIME Daytime [93,JBP]
+ 15 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 17 QUOTE Quote of the Day [100,JBP]
+ 19 CHARGEN Character Generator [92,JBP]
+ 20 FTP-DATA File Transfer [Default Data] [96,JBP]
+ 21 FTP File Transfer [Control] [96,JBP]
+ 23 TELNET Telnet [112,JBP]
+ 25 SMTP Simple Mail Transfer [102,JBP]
+ 27 NSW-FE NSW User System FE [24,RHT]
+ 29 MSG-ICP MSG ICP [85,RHT]
+ 31 MSG-AUTH MSG Authentication [85,RHT]
+ 33 DSP Display Support Protocol [EXC]
+ 35 any private printer server [JBP]
+ 37 TIME Time [108,JBP]
+ 39 RLP Resource Location Protocol [MA]
+ 41 GRAPHICS Graphics [129,JBP]
+ 42 NAMESERVER Host Name Server [99,JBP]
+ 43 NICNAME Who Is [55,MARY]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 9]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 44 MPM-FLAGS MPM FLAGS Protocol [JBP]
+ 45 MPM Message Processing Module [recv] [98,JBP]
+ 46 MPM-SND MPM [default send] [98,JBP]
+ 47 NI-FTP NI FTP [134,SK8]
+ 49 LOGIN Login Host Protocol [PHD1]
+ 51 LA-MAINT IMP Logical Address Maintenance [76,AGM]
+ 53 DOMAIN Domain Name Server [81,95,PM1]
+ 55 ISI-GL ISI Graphics Language [7,RB9]
+ 57 any private terminal access [JBP]
+ 59 any private file service [JBP]
+ 61 NI-MAIL NI MAIL [5,SK8]
+ 63 VIA-FTP VIA Systems - FTP [DXD]
+ 65 TACACS-DS TACACS-Database Service [3,KH43]
+ 67 BOOTPS Bootstrap Protocol Server [36,WJC2]
+ 68 BOOTPC Bootstrap Protocol Client [36,WJC2]
+ 69 TFTP Trivial File Transfer [126,DDC1]
+ 71 NETRJS-1 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3]
+ 72 NETRJS-2 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3]
+ 73 NETRJS-3 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3]
+ 74 NETRJS-4 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3]
+ 75 any private dial out service [JBP]
+ 77 any private RJE service [JBP]
+ 79 FINGER Finger [52,KLH]
+ 81 HOSTS2-NS HOSTS2 Name Server [EAK1]
+ 83 MIT-ML-DEV MIT ML Device [DPR]
+ 85 MIT-ML-DEV MIT ML Device [DPR]
+ 87 any private terminal link [JBP]
+ 89 SU-MIT-TG SU/MIT Telnet Gateway [MRC]
+ 91 MIT-DOV MIT Dover Spooler [EBM]
+ 93 DCP Device Control Protocol [DT15]
+ 95 SUPDUP SUPDUP [27,MRC]
+ 97 SWIFT-RVF Swift Remote Vitural File Protocol [MXR]
+ 98 TACNEWS TAC News [ANM2]
+ 99 METAGRAM Metagram Relay [GEOF]
+ 101 HOSTNAME NIC Host Name Server [54,MARY]
+ 102 ISO-TSAP ISO-TSAP [16,MTR]
+ 103 X400 X400 [HCF2]
+ 104 X400-SND X400-SND [HCF2]
+ 105 CSNET-NS Mailbox Name Nameserver [127,MS56]
+ 107 RTELNET Remote Telnet Service [101,JBP]
+ 109 POP2 Post Office Protocol - Version 2 [14,JKR1]
+ 110 POP3 Post Office Protocol - Version 3 [122,MTR]
+ 111 SUNRPC SUN Remote Procedure Call [DXG]
+ 113 AUTH Authentication Service [130,MCSJ]
+ 115 SFTP Simple File Transfer Protocol [73,MKL1]
+ 117 UUCP-PATH UUCP Path Service [44,MAE]
+ 119 NNTP Network News Transfer Protocol [65,PL4]
+ 121 ERPC Encore Expedited Remote Proc. Call [132,JXO]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 10]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 123 NTP Network Time Protocol [80,DLM1]
+ 125 LOCUS-MAP Locus PC-Interface Net Map Server [137,EP53]
+ 127 LOCUS-CON Locus PC-Interface Conn Server [137,EP53]
+ 129 PWDGEN Password Generator Protocol [141,FJW]
+ 130 CISCO-FNA CISCO FNATIVE [WXB]
+ 131 CISCO-TNA CISCO TNATIVE [WXB]
+ 132 CISCO-SYS CISCO SYSMAINT [WXB]
+ 133 STATSRV Statistics Service [DLM1]
+ 134 INGRES-NET INGRES-NET Service [MXB]
+ 135 LOC-SRV Location Service [JXP]
+ 136 PROFILE PROFILE Naming System [LLP]
+ 137 NETBIOS-NS NETBIOS Name Service [JBP]
+ 138 NETBIOS-DGM NETBIOS Datagram Service [JBP]
+ 139 NETBIOS-SSN NETBIOS Session Service [JBP]
+ 140 EMFIS-DATA EMFIS Data Service [GB7]
+ 141 EMFIS-CNTL EMFIS Control Service [GB7]
+ 142 BL-IDM Britton-Lee IDM [SXS1]
+ 143 IMAP2 Interim Mail Access Protocol v2 [MRC]
+ 144 NEWS NewS [JAG]
+ 145 UAAC UAAC Protocol [DAG4]
+ 146 ISO-TP0 ISO-IP0 [86,MTR]
+ 147 ISO-IP ISO-IP [MTR]
+ 148 CRONUS CRONUS-SUPPORT [135,JXB]
+ 149 AED-512 AED 512 Emulation Service [AXB]
+ 150 SQL-NET SQL-NET [MXP]
+ 151 HEMS HEMS [87,CXT]
+ 152 BFTP Background File Transfer Program [AD14]
+ 153 SGMP SGMP [37,MS9]
+ 154 NETSC-PROD NETSC [SH37]
+ 155 NETSC-DEV NETSC [SH37]
+ 156 SQLSRV SQL Service [CMR]
+ 157 KNET-CMP KNET/VM Command/Message Protocol [77,GSM11]
+ 158 PCMail-SRV PCMail Server [19,MXL]
+ 159 NSS-Routing NSS-Routing [JXR]
+ 160 SGMP-TRAPS SGMP-TRAPS [37,MS9]
+ 161 SNMP SNMP [15,MTR]
+ 162 SNMPTRAP SNMPTRAP [15,MTR]
+ 163 CMIP-Manage CMIP/TCP Manager [4,AXB1]
+ 164 CMIP-Agent CMIP/TCP Agent [4,AXB1]
+ 165 XNS-Courier Xerox [144,SXA]
+ 166 S-Net Sirius Systems [BXL]
+ 167 NAMP NAMP [MS9]
+ 168 RSVD RSVD [NT12]
+ 169 SEND SEND [WDW11]
+ 170 Print-SRV Network PostScript [BKR]
+ 171 Multiplex Network Innovations Multiplex [KXD]
+ 172 CL/1 Network Innovations CL/1 [KXD]
+ 173 Xyplex-MUX Xyplex [BXS]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 11]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 174 MAILQ MAILQ [RXZ]
+ 175 VMNET VMNET [CXT]
+ 176 GENRAD-MUX GENRAD-MUX [RXT]
+ 177 XDMCP X Display Manager Control Protocol [RWS4]
+ 178 NextStep NextStep Window Server [LXH]
+ 179 BGP Border Gateway Protocol [KSL]
+ 180 RIS Intergraph [DXB]
+ 181 Unify Unify [VXS]
+ 182 Unisys-Cam Unisys-Cam [GXG]
+ 183 OCBinder OCBinder [JXO1]
+ 184 OCServer OCServer [JXO1]
+ 185 Remote-KIS Remote-KIS [RXD1]
+ 186 KIS KIS Protocol [RXD1]
+ 187 ACI Application Communication Interface [RXC1]
+ 188 MUMPS MUMPS [HS23]
+ 189 QFT Queued File Transport [WXS]
+ 190 GACP Gateway Access Control Protocol [PCW]
+ 191 Prospero Prospero [BCN]
+ 192 OSU-NMS OSU Network Monitoring System [DXK]
+ 193 SRMP Spider Remote Monitoring Protocol [TXS]
+ 194 IRC Internet Relay Chat Protocol [JXO2]
+ 195 DN6-NLM-AUD DNSIX Network Level Module Audit [LL69]
+ 196 DN6-SMM-RED DNSIX Session Mgt Module Audit Redirect[LL69]
+ 197 DLS Directory Location Service [SXB]
+ 198 DLS-Mon Directory Location Service Monitor [SXB]
+ 198-200 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 201 AT-RMTP AppleTalk Routing Maintenance [RXC]
+ 202 AT-NBP AppleTalk Name Binding [RXC]
+ 203 AT-3 AppleTalk Unused [RXC]
+ 204 AT-ECHO AppleTalk Echo [RXC]
+ 205 AT-5 AppleTalk Unused [RXC]
+ 206 AT-ZIS AppleTalk Zone Information [RXC]
+ 207 AT-7 AppleTalk Unused [RXC]
+ 208 AT-8 AppleTalk Unused [RXC]
+ 209-223 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 224-241 Reserved [JBP]
+ 243 SUR-MEAS Survey Measurement [6,DDC1]
+ 245 LINK LINK [1,RDB2]
+ 246 DSP3270 Display Systems Protocol [39,WJS1]
+ 247-255 Reserved [JBP]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 12]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ UNIX PORTS
+
+ By convention, ports in the range 256 to 1024 are used for "Unix
+ Standard" services. Listed here are some of the normal uses of these
+ port numbers.
+
+ Service Name Port/Protocol Description
+ ------------ ------------- -----------
+
+ echo 7/tcp
+ discard 9/tcp sink null
+ systat 11/tcp users
+ daytime 13/tcp
+ netstat 15/tcp
+ qotd 17/tcp quote
+ chargen 19/tcp ttytst source
+ ftp-data 20/tcp
+ ftp 21/tcp
+ telnet 23/tcp
+ smtp 25/tcp mail
+ time 37/tcp timserver
+ name 42/tcp nameserver
+ whois 43/tcp nicname
+ nameserver 53/tcp domain
+ apts 57/tcp any private terminal service
+ apfs 59/tcp any private file service
+ rje 77/tcp netrjs
+ finger 79/tcp
+ link 87/tcp ttylink
+ supdup 95/tcp
+ newacct 100/tcp [unauthorized use]
+ hostnames 101/tcp hostname
+ iso-tsap 102/tcp tsap
+ x400 103/tcp
+ x400-snd 104/tcp
+ csnet-ns 105/tcp CSNET Name Service
+ pop-2 109/tcp pop postoffice
+ sunrpc 111/tcp
+ auth 113/tcp authentication
+ sftp 115/tcp
+ uucp-path 117/tcp
+ nntp 119/tcp usenet readnews untp
+ ntp 123/tcp network time protocol
+ statsrv 133/tcp
+ profile 136/tcp
+ NeWS 144/tcp news
+ print-srv 170/tcp
+ exec 512/tcp remote process execution;
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 13]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ authentication performed using
+ passwords and UNIX loppgin names
+ login 513/tcp remote login a la telnet;
+ automatic authentication performed
+ based on priviledged port numbers
+ and distributed data bases which
+ identify "authentication domains"
+ cmd 514/tcp like exec, but automatic
+ authentication is performed as for
+ login server
+ printer 515/tcp spooler
+ efs 520/tcp extended file name server
+ tempo 526/tcp newdate
+ courier 530/tcp rpc
+ conference 531/tcp chat
+ netnews 532/tcp readnews
+ uucp 540/tcp uucpd
+ klogin 543/tcp
+ kshell 544/tcp krcmd
+ dsf 555/tcp
+ remotefs 556/tcp rfs server
+ chshell 562/tcp chcmd
+ meter 570/tcp demon
+ pcserver 600/tcp Sun IPC server
+ nqs 607/tcp nqs
+ mdqs 666/tcp
+ rfile 750/tcp
+ pump 751/tcp
+ qrh 752/tcp
+ rrh 753/tcp
+ tell 754/tcp send
+ nlogin 758/tcp
+ con 759/tcp
+ ns 760/tcp
+ rxe 761/tcp
+ quotad 762/tcp
+ cycleserv 763/tcp
+ omserv 764/tcp
+ webster 765/tcp
+ phonebook 767/tcp phone
+ vid 769/tcp
+ rtip 771/tcp
+ cycleserv2 772/tcp
+ submit 773/tcp
+ rpasswd 774/tcp
+ entomb 775/tcp
+ wpages 776/tcp
+ wpgs 780/tcp
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 14]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ mdbs_daemon 800/tcp
+ device 801/tcp
+ maitrd 997/tcp
+ busboy 998/tcp
+ garcon 999/tcp
+ blackjack 1025/tcp network blackjack
+ bbn-mmc 1347/tcp multi media conferencing
+ bbn-mmx 1348/tcp multi media conferencing
+ orasrv 1525/tcp oracle
+ ingreslock 1524/tcp
+ issd 1600/tcp
+ nkd 1650/tcp
+ dc 2001/tcp
+ mailbox 2004/tcp
+ berknet 2005/tcp
+ invokator 2006/tcp
+ dectalk 2007/tcp
+ conf 2008/tcp
+ news 2009/tcp
+ search 2010/tcp
+ raid-cc 2011/tcp raid
+ ttyinfo 2012/tcp
+ raid-am 2013/tcp
+ troff 2014/tcp
+ cypress 2015/tcp
+ cypress-stat 2017/tcp
+ terminaldb 2018/tcp
+ whosockami 2019/tcp
+ servexec 2021/tcp
+ down 2022/tcp
+ ellpack 2025/tcp
+ shadowserver 2027/tcp
+ submitserver 2028/tcp
+ device2 2030/tcp
+ blackboard 2032/tcp
+ glogger 2033/tcp
+ scoremgr 2034/tcp
+ imsldoc 2035/tcp
+ objectmanager 2038/tcp
+ lam 2040/tcp
+ interbase 2041/tcp
+ isis 2042/tcp
+ rimsl 2044/tcp
+ dls 2047/tcp
+ dls-monitor 2048/tcp
+ shilp 2049/tcp
+ NSWS 3049/tcp
+ rfa 4672/tcp remote file access server
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 15]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ commplex-main 5000/tcp
+ commplex-link 5001/tcp
+ padl2sim 5236/tcp
+ man 9535/tcp
+
+ echo 7/udp
+ discard 9/udp sink null
+ systat 11/udp users
+ daytime 13/udp
+ netstat 15/udp
+ qotd 17/udp quote
+ chargen 19/udp ttytst source
+ time 37/udp timserver
+ rlp 39/udp resource
+ name 42/udp nameserver
+ whois 43/udp nicname
+ nameserver 53/udp domain
+ bootps 67/udp bootp
+ bootpc 68/udp
+ tftp 69/udp
+ sunrpc 111/udp
+ erpc 121/udp
+ ntp 123/udp
+ statsrv 133/udp
+ profile 136/udp
+ snmp 161/udp
+ snmp-trap 162/udp
+ at-rtmp 201/udp
+ at-nbp 202/udp
+ at-3 203/udp
+ at-echo 204/udp
+ at-5 205/udp
+ at-zis 206/udp
+ at-7 207/udp
+ at-8 208/udp
+ biff 512/udp used by mail system to notify users
+ of new mail received; currently
+ receives messages only from
+ processes on the same machine
+ who 513/udp maintains data bases showing who's
+ logged in to machines on a local
+ net and the load average of the
+ machine
+ syslog 514/udp
+ talk 517/udp like tenex link, but across
+ machine - unfortunately, doesn't
+ use link protocol (this is actually
+ just a rendezvous port from which a
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 16]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ tcp connection is established)
+ ntalk 518/udp
+ utime 519/udp unixtime
+ router 520/udp local routing process (on site);
+ uses variant of Xerox NS routing
+ information protocol
+ timed 525/udp timeserver
+ netwall 533/udp for emergency broadcasts
+ new-rwho 550/udp new-who
+ rmonitor 560/udp rmonitord
+ monitor 561/udp
+ meter 571/udp udemon
+ elcsd 704/udp errlog copy/server daemon
+ loadav 750/udp
+ vid 769/udp
+ cadlock 770/udp
+ notify 773/udp
+ acmaint_dbd 774/udp
+ acmaint_transd 775/udp
+ wpages 776/udp
+ puparp 998/udp
+ applix 999/udp Applix ac
+ puprouter 999/udp
+ cadlock 1000/udp
+ hermes 1248/udp
+ wizard 2001/udp curry
+ globe 2002/udp
+ emce 2004/udp CCWS mm conf
+ oracle 2005/udp
+ raid-cc 2006/udp raid
+ raid-am 2007/udp
+ terminaldb 2008/udp
+ whosockami 2009/udp
+ pipe_server 2010/udp
+ servserv 2011/udp
+ raid-ac 2012/udp
+ raid-cd 2013/udp
+ raid-sf 2014/udp
+ raid-cs 2015/udp
+ bootserver 2016/udp
+ bootclient 2017/udp
+ rellpack 2018/udp
+ about 2019/udp
+ xinupageserver 2020/udp
+ xinuexpansion1 2021/udp
+ xinuexpansion2 2022/udp
+ xinuexpansion3 2023/udp
+ xinuexpansion4 2024/udp
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 17]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ xribs 2025/udp
+ scrabble 2026/udp
+ isis 2042/udp
+ isis-bcast 2043/udp
+ rimsl 2044/udp
+ cdfunc 2045/udp
+ sdfunc 2046/udp
+ dls 2047/udp
+ shilp 2049/udp
+ rmonitor_secure 5145/udp
+ xdsxdm 6558/udp
+ isode-dua 17007/udp
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 18]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ INTERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES
+
+ Host Extensions for IP Multicasting (RFC-1112) [43] specifies the
+ extensions required of a host implementation of the Internet Protocol
+ (IP) to support multicasting. Current addresses are listed below.
+
+ 224.0.0.0 Reserved [43,JBP]
+ 224.0.0.1 All Hosts on this Subnet [43,JBP]
+ 224.0.0.2 All Gateways on this Subnet (proposed) [JBP]
+ 224.0.0.3 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 224.0.0.4 DVMRP Routers [140,JBP]
+ 224.0.0.5 OSPFIGP OSPFIGP All Routers [83,JXM1]
+ 224.0.0.6 OSPFIGP OSPFIGP Designated Routers [83,JXM1]
+ 244.0.0.7-244.0.0.255 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 224.0.1.0 VMTP Managers Group [17,DRC3]
+ 224.0.1.1 NTP Network Time Protocol [80,DLM1]
+ 224.0.1.2 SGI-Dogfight [AXC]
+ 224.0.1.3 Rwhod [SXD]
+ 224.0.1.4 VNP [DRC3]
+ 244.0.1.5-244.0.1.255 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 224.0.2.1 "rwho" Group (BSD) (unofficial) [JBP]
+ 232.x.x.x VMTP transient groups [17,DRC3]
+
+ Note that when used on an Ethernet or IEEE 802 network, the 23
+ low-order bits of the IP Multicast address are placed in the low-
+ order 23 bits of the Ethernet or IEEE 802 net multicast address
+ 1.0.94.0.0.0. See the next section on "IANA ETHERNET ADDRESS
+ BLOCK".
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 19]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ IANA ETHERNET ADDRESS BLOCK
+
+ The IANA owns an Ethernet address block which may be used for
+ multicast address asignments or other special purposes.
+
+ The address block in IEEE binary is (which is in bit transmission
+ order):
+
+ 0000 0000 0000 0000 0111 1010
+
+ In the normal Internet dotted decimal notation this is 0.0.94 since
+ the bytes are transmitted higher order first and bits within bytes
+ are transmitted lower order first (see "Data Notation" in the
+ Introduction).
+
+ IEEE CSMA/CD and Token Bus bit transmission order: 00 00 5E
+
+ IEEE Token Ring bit transmission order: 00 00 7A
+
+ Appearance on the wire (bits transmitted from left to right):
+
+ 0 23 47
+ | | |
+ 1000 0000 0000 0000 0111 1010 xxxx xxx0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
+ | |
+ Multicast Bit 0 = Internet Multicast
+ 1 = Assigned by IANA for
+ other uses
+
+ Appearance in memory (bits transmitted right-to-left within octets,
+ octets transmitted left-to-right):
+
+ 0 23 47
+ | | |
+ 0000 0001 0000 0000 0101 1110 0xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
+ | |
+ Multicast Bit 0 = Internet Multicast
+ 1 = Assigned by IANA for other uses
+
+ The latter representation corresponds to the Internet standard bit-
+ order, and is the format that most programmers have to deal with.
+ Using this representation, the range of Internet Multicast addresses
+ is:
+
+ 01-00-5E-00-00-00 to 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FF in hex, or
+
+ 1.0.94.0.0.0 to 1.0.94.127.255.255 in dotted decimal
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 20]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ IP TOS PARAMETERS
+
+ This documents the default Type-of-Service values that are currently
+ recommended for the most important Internet protocols.
+
+ There are three binary TOS attributes: low delay, high throughput,
+ and high reliability; in each case, an attribute bit is turned on to
+ indicate "better". The three attributes cannot all be optimized
+ simultanously, and in fact the TOS algorithms that have been
+ discussed tend to make "better" values of the attributes mutually
+ exclusive. Therefore, the recommended values have at most one bit
+ on.
+
+ Generally, protocols which are involved in direct interaction with a
+ human should select low delay, while data transfers which may involve
+ large blocks of data are need high throughput. Finally, high
+ reliability is most important for datagram-based Internet management
+ functions.
+
+ Application protocols not included in these tables should be able to
+ make appropriate choice of low delay (1 0 0) or high throughput (0 1
+ 0).
+
+ The following are recommended values for TOS:
+
+ ----- Type-of-Service Value -----
+
+ Low High High
+ Protocol Delay Throughput Reliability
+
+ TELNET (1) 1 0 0
+
+ FTP
+ Control 1 0 0
+ Data (2) 0 1 0
+
+ TFTP 1 0 0
+
+ SMTP (3)
+ Cmd phase 1 0 0
+ DATA phase 0 1 0
+
+ Domain Name Service
+ UDP Query 1 0 0
+ TCP Query 0 0 0
+ Zone Tnsfr 0 1 0
+
+ NNTP 0 0 0
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 21]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ICMP
+ Errors 0 0 0
+ Queries 0 0 0
+
+ Any IGP 0 0 1
+
+ EGP 0 0 0
+
+ SNMP 0 0 1
+
+ BOOTP 0 0 0
+
+ Notes:
+
+ (1) Includes all interactive user protocols (e.g., rlogin).
+
+ (2) Includes all bulk data transfer protocols (e.g., rcp).
+
+ (3) If the implementation does not support changing the TOS
+ during the lifetime of the connection, then the recommended
+ TOS on opening the connection is (0,0,0).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 22]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ IP TIME TO LIVE PARAMETER
+
+ The current recommended default TTL for the Internet Protocol (IP)
+ RFC-791 [45,105] is 32.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 23]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ DOMAIN SYSTEM PARAMETERS
+
+ The Internet Domain Naming System (DOMAIN) includes several
+ parameters. These are documented in RFC-1034, [81] and RFC-1035
+ [82]. The CLASS parameter is listed here. The per CLASS parameters
+ are defined in separate RFCs as indicated.
+
+ Domain System Parameters:
+
+ Decimal Name References
+ ------- ---- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [PM1]
+ 1 Internet (IN) [81,PM1]
+ 2 Unassigned [PM1]
+ 3 Chaos (CH) [PM1]
+ 4 Hessoid (HS) [PM1]
+ 5-65534 Unassigned [PM1]
+ 65535 Reserved
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 24]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ BOOTP PARAMETERS
+
+ The Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) RFC-951 [36] describes an IP/UDP
+ bootstrap protocol (BOOTP) which allows a diskless client machine to
+ discover its own IP address, the address of a server host, and the
+ name of a file to be loaded into memory and executed. The BOOTP
+ Vendor Information Extensions RFC-1084 [117] proposes an addition to
+ the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP).
+
+ Vendor Extensions are listed below:
+
+ Tag Name Data Length Meaning References
+ --- ---- ----------- ------- ----------
+ 0 Pad 0 None
+ 1 Subnet Mask 4 Subnet Mask Value
+ 2 Time Zone 4 Time Offset in
+ Seconds from UTC
+ 3 Gateways N N/4 Gateway addresses
+ 4 Time Server N N/4 Timeserver addresses
+ 5 Name Server N N/4 IEN-116 Server addresses
+ 6 Domain Server N N/4 DNS Server addresses
+ 7 Log Server N N/4 Logging Server addresses
+ 8 Quotes Server N N/4 Quotes Server addresses
+ 9 LPR Server N N/4 Printer Server addresses
+ 10 Impress Server N N/4 Impress Server addresses
+ 11 RLP Server N N/4 RLP Server addresses
+ 12 Hostname N Hostname string
+ 13 Boot File Size 2 Size of boot file in 512 byte
+ checks
+ 14 Merit Dump File Client to dump and name
+ the file to dump it to
+ 15-127 Unassigned
+ 128-154 Reserved
+ 255 End 0 None
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 25]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ NETWORK MANAGEMENT PARAMETERS
+
+ For the management of hosts and gateways on the Internet a data
+ structure for the information has been defined. This data structure
+ should be used with any of several possible management protocols, such
+ as the "Simple Network Management Protocol" (SNMP) RFC-1098 [15], or
+ the "Common Management Information Protocol over TCP" (CMOT) [142].
+
+ The data structure is the "Structure and Indentification of Management
+ Information for TCP/IP-based Internets" (SMI) RFC-1065 [120], and the
+ "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based
+ Internets" (MIB) [121].
+
+ The SMI includes the provision for parameters or codes to indicate
+ experimental or private data structures. These parameter assignments
+ are listed here.
+
+ The older "Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol" (SGMP) RFC-1028 [37]
+ also defined a data structure. The parameter assignments used with
+ SGMP are included here for hist orical completeness.
+
+ SMI Network Management Experimental Codes:
+
+ Prefix: 1.3.6.1.3.
+
+ Decimal Name Description References
+ ------- ---- ----------- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JKR1]
+ 1 CLNP ISO CLNP Objects [MTR]
+ 2 T1-Carrier T1 Carrier Objects [MTR]
+ 3 IEEE8023 Ethernet-like Objects [MTR]
+ 4 IEEE8025 Token Ring-like Objects [MTR]
+
+ SMI Network Management Private Enterprise Codes:
+
+ Prefix: 1.3.6.1.4.1.
+
+ Decimal Name References
+ ------- ---- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JKR1]
+ 1 Proteon [GSM11]
+ 2 IBM [JXR]
+ 3 CMU [SXW]
+ 4 Unix [KXS]
+ 5 ACC [AB20]
+ 6 TWG [KZM]
+ 7 CAYMAN [BP52]
+ 8 NYSERNET [MS9]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 26]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 9 cisco [GXS]
+ 10 NSC [GS123]
+ 11 HP [RDXS]
+ 12 Epilogue [KA4]
+ 13 U of Tennessee [JDC20]
+ 14 BBN [RH6]
+ 15 Xylogics, Inc. [JRL3]
+ 16 Unisys [UXW]
+ 17 Canstar [SXP]
+ 18 Wellfleet [JCB1]
+ 19 TRW [GGB2]
+ 20 MIT [JR35]
+ 21 EON [MXW]
+ 22 Spartacus [YXK]
+ 23 Excelan [RXB]
+ 24 Spider Systems [VXW]
+ 25 NSFNET [HWB]
+ 26 Hughes LAN Systems [AXC1]
+ 27 Intergraph [SXC]
+ 28 Interlan [FJK2]
+ 29 Vitalink Communications [FXB]
+ 30 Ulana [BXA]
+ 31 NSWC [SRN1]
+ 32 Santa Cruz Operation [KR35]
+ 33 Xyplex [BXS]
+ 34 Cray [HXE]
+ 35 Bell Northern Research [GXW]
+ 36 DEC [RXB1]
+ 37 Touch [BXB]
+ 38 Network Research Corp. [BXV]
+ 39 Baylor College of Medicine [SB98]
+ 40 NMFECC-LLNL [SXH]
+ 41 SRI [DW181]
+ 42 Sun Microsystems [DXY]
+ 43 3Com [TB6]
+ 44 CMC [DXP]
+ 45 SynOptics [BXB1]
+ 46 Cheyenne Software [RXH]
+ 47 Prime Computer [MXS]
+ 48 MCNC/North Carolina Data Network [KXW]
+ 49 Chipcom [JXC]
+ 50 Optical Data Systems [JXF]
+ 51 gated [JXH]
+ 52 Cabletron Systems [RXD]
+ 53 Apollo Computers [JXB]
+ 54 DeskTalk Systems, Inc. [DXK]
+ 55 SSDS [RXS]
+ 56 Castle Rock Computing [JXS1]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 27]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 57 MIPS Computer Systems [CXM]
+ 58 TGV, Inc. [KAA]
+ 59 Silicon Graphics, Inc. [RXJ]
+ 60 University of British Columbia [DXM]
+ 61 Merit [BXN]
+ 62 FiberCom [EXR]
+ 63 Apple Computer Inc [JXH1]
+ 64 Gandalf [HXK]
+ 65 Dartmouth [PXK]
+ 66 David Systems [DXM]
+ 67 Reuter [BXZ]
+ 68 Cornell [DC126]
+ 69 TMAC [MLS34]
+ 70 Locus Computing Corp. [AXS]
+ 71 NASA [SS92]
+ 72 Retix [AXM]
+ 73 Boeing [JXG]
+ 74 AT&T [AXC2]
+ 75 Ungermann-Bass [DXM]
+ 76 Digital Analysis Corp. [SXK]
+ 77 LAN Manager [JXG1]
+ 78 Netlabs [JB478]
+ 79 ICL [JXI]
+ 80 Auspex Systems [BXE]
+ 81 Lannet Company [EXR]
+ 82 Network Computing Devices [DM280]
+ 83 Raycom Systems [BXW1]
+ 84 Pirelli Focom Ltd. [SXL]
+ 85 Datability Software Systems [LXF]
+ 86 Network Application Technology [YXW]
+ 87 LINK (Lokales Informatik-Netz Karlsruhe) [GXS]
+ 88 NYU [BJR2]
+ 89 RND [RXN]
+ 90 InterCon Systems Corporation [AW90]
+
+ SGMP Vendor Specific Codes:
+
+ Prefix: 1,255,
+
+ Decimal Name References
+ ------- ---- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JKR1]
+ 1 Proteon [JS18]
+ 2 IBM [JXR]
+ 3 CMU [SXW]
+ 4 Unix [MS9]
+ 5 ACC [AB20]
+ 6 TWG [MTR]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 28]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 7 CAYMAN [BP52]
+ 8 NYSERNET [MS9]
+ 9 cisco [GS2]
+ 10 BBN [RH6]
+ 11 Unassigned [JKR1]
+ 12 MIT [JR35]
+ 13-254 Unassigned [JKR1]
+ 255 Reserved [JKR1]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 29]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ARPANET AND MILNET LOGICAL ADDRESSES
+
+ The ARPANET facility for "logical addressing" is described in RFC-878
+ [57] and RFC-1005 [109]. A portion of the possible logical addresses
+ are reserved for standard uses.
+
+ There are 49,152 possible logical host addresses. Of these, 256 are
+ reserved for assignment to well-known functions. Assignments for
+ well-known functions are made by the IANA. Assignments for other
+ logical host addresses are made by the NIC.
+
+ Logical Address Assignments:
+
+ Decimal Description References
+ ------- ----------- ----------
+ 0 Reserved [JBP]
+ 1 The BBN Core Gateways [MB]
+ 2-254 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 255 Reserved [JBP]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 30]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ARPANET AND MILNET LINK NUMBERS
+
+ The word "link" here refers to a field in the original ARPANET
+ Host/IMP interface leader. The link was originally defined as an 8-
+ bit field. Later specifications defined this field as the "message-
+ id" with a length of 12 bits. The name link now refers to the high
+ order 8 bits of this 12-bit message-id field. The Host/IMP interface
+ is defined in BBN Report 1822 [2].
+
+ The low-order 4 bits of the message-id field are called the sub-link.
+ Unless explicitly specified otherwise for a particular protocol,
+ there is no sender to receiver significance to the sub-link. The
+ sender may use the sub-link in any way he chooses (it is returned in
+ the RFNM by the destination IMP), the receiver should ignore the
+ sub-link.
+
+ Link Assignments:
+
+ Decimal Description References
+ ------- ----------- ----------
+ 0-63 BBNCC Monitoring [MB]
+ 64-149 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 150 Xerox NS IDP [133,XEROX]
+ 151 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 152 PARC Universal Protocol [8,XEROX]
+ 153 TIP Status Reporting [JGH]
+ 154 TIP Accounting [JGH]
+ 155 Internet Protocol [regular] [105,JBP]
+ 156-158 Internet Protocol [experimental] [105,JBP]
+ 159 Figleaf Link [JBW1]
+ 160 Blacker Local Network Protocol [DM28]
+ 161-194 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 195 ISO-IP [64,RXM]
+ 196-247 Experimental Protocols [JBP]
+ 248-255 Network Maintenance [JGH]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 31]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ARPANET AND MILNET X.25 ADDRESS MAPPINGS
+
+ All MILNET hosts are assigned addresses by the Defense Data Network
+ (DDN). The address of a MILNET host may be obtained from the Network
+ Information Center (NIC), represented as an ASCII text string in what
+ is called "host table format". This section describes the process by
+ which MILNET X.25 addresses may be derived from addresses in the NIC
+ host table format.
+
+ A NIC host table address consists of the ASCII text string
+ representations of four decimal numbers separated by periods,
+ corresponding to the four octeted of a thirty-two bit Internet
+ address. The four decimal numbers are referred to in this section as
+ "n", "h' "l", and "i". Thus, a host table address may be represented
+ as: "n.h.l.i". Each of these four numbers will have either one, two,
+ or three decimal digits and will never have a value greater than 255.
+ For example, in the host table, address: "10.2.0.124", n=10, h=2,
+ l=0, and i=124. To convert a host table address to a MILNET X.25
+ address:
+
+ 1. If h < 64, the host table address corresponds to the X.25
+ physical address:
+
+ ZZZZ F IIIHHZZ (SS)
+
+ where:
+
+ ZZZZ = 0000 as required
+
+ F = 0 because the address is a physical address;
+
+ III is a three decimal digit respresentation of
+ "i", right-adjusted and padded with leading
+ zeros if required;
+
+ HH is a two decimal digit representation of "h",
+ right-adjusted and padded with leading zeros
+ if required;
+
+ ZZ = 00 and
+
+ (SS) is optional
+
+ In the example given above, the host table address 10.2.0.124
+ corresponds to the X.25 physical address 000001240200.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 32]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 2. If h > 64 or h = 64, the host table address corresponds to the
+ X.25 logical address
+
+ ZZZZ F RRRRRZZ (SS)
+
+ where:
+
+ ZZZZ = 0000 as required
+
+ F = 1 because the address is a logical address;
+
+ RRRRR is a five decimal digit representation of
+ the result "r" of the calculation
+
+ r = h * 256 + i
+
+ (Note that the decimal representation of
+ "r" will always require five digits);
+
+ ZZ = 00 and
+
+ (SS) is optional
+
+ Thus, the host table address 10.83.0.207 corresponds to the X.25
+ logical address 000012145500.
+
+ In both cases, the "n" and "l" fields of the host table address are
+ not used.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 33]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ IEEE 802 NUMBERS OF INTEREST
+
+ Some of the networks of all classes are IEEE 802 Networks. These
+ systems may use a Link Service Access Point (LSAP) field in much the
+ same way the ARPANET uses the "link" field. Further, there is an
+ extension of the LSAP header called the Sub-Network Access Protocol
+ (SNAP).
+
+ The IEEE likes to describe numbers in binary in bit transmission
+ order, which is the opposite of the big-endian order used throughout
+ the Internet protocol documentation.
+
+ Assignments:
+
+ Link Service Access Point Description References
+ ------------------------- ----------- ----------
+ IEEE Internet
+ binary binary decimal
+ 00000000 00000000 0 Null LSAP [IEEE]
+ 01000000 00000010 2 Indiv LLC Sublayer Mgt [IEEE]
+ 11000000 00000011 3 Group LLC Sublayer Mgt [IEEE]
+ 00100000 00000100 4 SNA Path Control [IEEE]
+ 01100000 00000110 6 Reserved (DOD IP) [104,JBP]
+ 01110000 00001110 14 PROWAY-LAN [IEEE]
+ 01110010 01001110 78 EIA-RS 511 [IEEE]
+ 01111010 01011110 94 ISI IP [JBP]
+ 01110001 10001110 142 PROWAY-LAN [IEEE]
+ 01010101 10101010 170 SNAP [IEEE]
+ 01111111 11111110 254 ISO DIS 8473 [64,JXJ]
+ 11111111 11111111 255 Global DSAP [IEEE]
+
+ These numbers (and others) are assigned by the IEEE Standards Office.
+ The address is: IEEE Standards Office, 345 East 47th Street, New
+ York, N.Y. 10017, Attn: Vince Condello. Phone: (212) 705-7092.
+
+ At an ad hoc special session on "IEEE 802 Networks and ARP", held
+ during the TCP Vendors Workshop (August 1986), an approach to a
+ consistent way to send DoD-IP datagrams and other IP related
+ protocols (such as the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)) on 802
+ networks was developed, using the SNAP extension (see RFC-1010 and
+ RFC-1042 [90]).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 34]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ETHERNET NUMBERS OF INTEREST
+
+ Many of the networks of all classes are Ethernets (10Mb) or
+ Experimental Ethernets (3Mb). These systems use a message "type"
+ field in much the same way the ARPANET uses the "link" field.
+
+ If you need an Ethernet type, contact the Xerox Corporation, Xerox
+ Systems Institute, 475 Oakmead Parkway, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, Attn:
+ Ms. Fonda Pallone, (408) 737-4652.
+
+ The following list is contributed unverified information from various
+ sources.
+
+ Assignments:
+
+ Ethernet Exp. Ethernet Description References
+ ------------- ------------- ----------- ----------
+ decimal Hex decimal octal
+ 000 0000-05DC - - IEEE802.3 Length Field [XEROX]
+ 257 0101-01FF - - Experimental [XEROX]
+ 512 0200 512 1000 XEROX PUP (see 0A00) [8,XEROX]
+ 513 0201 - - PUP Addr Trans (see 0A01)[XEROX]
+ 1536 0600 1536 3000 XEROX NS IDP [133,XEROX]
+ 2048 0800 513 1001 DOD IP [105,JBP]
+ 2049 0801 - - X.75 Internet [XEROX]
+ 2050 0802 - - NBS Internet [XEROX]
+ 2051 0803 - - ECMA Internet [XEROX]
+ 2052 0804 - - Chaosnet [XEROX]
+ 2053 0805 - - X.25 Level 3 [XEROX]
+ 2054 0806 - - ARP [88,JBP]
+ 2055 0807 - - XNS Compatability [XEROX]
+ 2076 081C - - Symbolics Private [DCP1]
+ 2184 0888-088A - - Xyplex [XEROX]
+ 2304 0900 - - Ungermann-Bass net debugr[XEROX]
+ 2560 0A00 - - Xerox IEEE802.3 PUP [XEROX]
+ 2561 0A01 - - PUP Addr Trans [XEROX]
+ 2989 0BAD - - Banyan Systems [XEROX]
+ 4096 1000 - - Berkeley Trailer nego [XEROX]
+ 4097 1001-100F - - Berkeley Trailer encap/IP[XEROX]
+ 5632 1600 - - Valid Systems [XEROX]
+ 16962 4242 - - PCS Basic Block Protocol [XEROX]
+ 21000 5208 - - BBN Simnet [XEROX]
+ 24576 6000 - - DEC Unassigned (Exp.) [XEROX]
+ 24577 6001 - - DEC MOP Dump/Load [XEROX]
+ 24578 6002 - - DEC MOP Remote Console [XEROX]
+ 24579 6003 - - DEC DECNET Phase IV Route[XEROX]
+ 24580 6004 - - DEC LAT [XEROX]
+ 24581 6005 - - DEC Diagnostic Protocol [XEROX]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 35]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 24582 6006 - - DEC Customer Protocol [XEROX]
+ 24583 6007 - - DEC LAVC, SCA [XEROX]
+ 24584 6008-6009 - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX]
+ 24586 6010-6014 - - 3Com Corporation [XEROX]
+ 28672 7000 - - Ungermann-Bass download [XEROX]
+ 28674 7002 - - Ungermann-Bass dia/loop [XEROX]
+ 28704 7020-7029 - - LRT [XEROX]
+ 28720 7030 - - Proteon [XEROX]
+ 28724 7034 - - Cabletron [XEROX]
+ 32771 8003 - - Cronus VLN [131,DT15]
+ 32772 8004 - - Cronus Direct [131,DT15]
+ 32773 8005 - - HP Probe [XEROX]
+ 32774 8006 - - Nestar [XEROX]
+ 32776 8008 - - AT&T [XEROX]
+ 32784 8010 - - Excelan [XEROX]
+ 32787 8013 - - SGI diagnostics [AXC]
+ 32788 8014 - - SGI network games [AXC]
+ 32789 8015 - - SGI reserved [AXC]
+ 32780 8016 - - SGI bounce server [AXC]
+ 32783 8019 - - Apollo Computers [XEROX]
+ 32815 802E - - Tymshare [XEROX]
+ 32816 802F - - Tigan, Inc. [XEROX]
+ 32821 8035 - - Reverse ARP [48,JXM]
+ 32822 8036 - - Aeonic Systems [XEROX]
+ 32824 8038 - - DEC LANBridge [XEROX]
+ 32825 8039-803C - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX]
+ 32829 803D - - DEC Ethernet Encryption [XEROX]
+ 32830 803E - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX]
+ 32831 803F - - DEC LAN Traffic Monitor [XEROX]
+ 32832 8040-8042 - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX]
+ 32836 8044 - - Planning Research Corp. [XEROX]
+ 32838 8046 - - AT&T [XEROX]
+ 32839 8047 - - AT&T [XEROX]
+ 32841 8049 - - ExperData [XEROX]
+ 32859 805B - - Stanford V Kernel exp. [XEROX]
+ 32860 805C - - Stanford V Kernel prod. [XEROX]
+ 32861 805D - - Evans & Sutherland [XEROX]
+ 32864 8060 - - Little Machines [XEROX]
+ 32866 8062 - - Counterpoint Computers [XEROX]
+ 32869 8065-8066 - - Univ. of Mass. @ Amherst [XEROX]
+ 32871 8067 - - Veeco Integrated Auto. [XEROX]
+ 32872 8068 - - General Dynamics [XEROX]
+ 32873 8069 - - AT&T [XEROX]
+ 32874 806A - - Autophon [XEROX]
+ 32876 806C - - ComDesign [XEROX]
+ 32877 806D - - Computgraphic Corp. [XEROX]
+ 32878 806E-8077 - - Landmark Graphics Corp. [XEROX]
+ 32890 807A - - Matra [XEROX]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 36]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 32891 807B - - Dansk Data Elektronik [XEROX]
+ 32892 807C - - Merit Internodal [HWB]
+ 32893 807D-807F - - Vitalink Communications [XEROX]
+ 32896 8080 - - Vitalink TransLAN III [XEROX]
+ 32897 8081-8083 - - Counterpoint Computers [XEROX]
+ 32923 809B - - Appletalk [XEROX]
+ 32924 809C-809E - - Datability [XEROX]
+ 32927 809F - - Spider Systems Ltd. [XEROX]
+ 32931 80A3 - - Nixdorf Computers [XEROX]
+ 32932 80A4-80B3 - - Siemens Gammasonics Inc. [XEROX]
+ 32960 80C0-80C3 - - DCA Data Exchange Cluster[XEROX]
+ 32966 80C6 - - Pacer Software [XEROX]
+ 32967 80C7 - - Applitek Corporation [XEROX]
+ 32968 80C8-80CC - - Intergraph Corporation [XEROX]
+ 32973 80CD-80CE - - Harris Corporation [XEROX]
+ 32974 80CF-80D2 - - Taylor Instrument [XEROX]
+ 32979 80D3-80D4 - - Rosemount Corporation [XEROX]
+ 32981 80D5 - - IBM SNA Service on Ether [XEROX]
+ 32989 80DD - - Varian Associates [XEROX]
+ 32990 80DE-80DF - - Integrated Solutions TRFS[XEROX]
+ 32992 80E0-80E3 - - Allen-Bradley [XEROX]
+ 32996 80E4-80F0 - - Datability [XEROX]
+ 33010 80F2 - - Retix [XEROX]
+ 33011 80F3 - - AppleTalk AARP (Kinetics)[XEROX]
+ 33012 80F4-80F5 - - Kinetics [XEROX]
+ 33015 80F7 - - Apollo Computer [XEROX]
+ 33023 80FF-8103 - - Wellfleet Communications [XEROX]
+ 33031 8107-8109 - - Symbolics Private [XEROX]
+ 33072 8130 - - Waterloo Microsystems [XEROX]
+ 33073 8131 - - VG Laboratory Systems [XEROX]
+ 33079 8137-8138 - - Novell, Inc. [XEROX]
+ 33081 8139-813D - - KTI [XEROX]
+ 33100 814C - - SNMP [JKR1]
+ 36864 9000 - - Loopback [XEROX]
+ 36865 9001 - - 3Com(Bridge) XNS Sys Mgmt[XEROX]
+ 36866 9002 - - 3Com(Bridge) TCP-IP Sys [XEROX]
+ 36867 9003 - - 3Com(Bridge) loop detect [XEROX]
+ 65280 FF00 - - BBN VITAL-LanBridge cache[XEROX]
+
+ The standard for transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernets and
+ Experimental Ethernets is specified in RFC-894 [61] and RFC-895 [91]
+ respectively.
+
+ NOTE: Ethernet 48-bit address blocks are assigned by the IEEE.
+
+ IEEE Standards Office, 345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017,
+ Attn: Vince Condello. Phone: (212) 705-7092.
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 37]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ETHERNET VENDOR ADDRESS COMPONENTS
+
+ Ethernet hardware addresses are 48 bits, expressed as 12 hexadecimal
+ digits (0-9, plus A-F, capitalized). These 12 hex digits consist of
+ the first/left 6 digits (which should match the vendor of the
+ Ethernet interface within the station) and the last/right 6 digits
+ which specify the interface serial number for that interface vendor.
+
+ Ethernet addresses might be written unhyphenated (e.g.,
+ 123456789ABC), or with one hyphen (e.g., 123456-789ABC), but should
+ be written hyphenated by octets (e.g., 12-34-56-78-9A-BC).
+
+ These addresses are physical station addresses, not multicast nor
+ broadcast, so the second hex digit (reading from the left) will be
+ even, not odd.
+
+ At present, it is not clear how the IEEE assigns Ethernet block
+ addresses. Whether in blocks of 2**24 or 2**25, and whether
+ multicasts are assigned with that block or separately. A portion of
+ the vendor block address is reportedly assigned serially, with the
+ other portion intentionally assigned randomly. If there is a global
+ algorithm for which addresses are designated to be physical (in a
+ chipset) versus logical (assigned in software), or globally-assigned
+ versus locally-assigned addresses, some of the known addresses do not
+ follow the scheme (e.g., AA0003; 02xxxx).
+
+ 00000C Cisco
+ 00000F NeXT
+ 000010 Sytek
+ 00001D Cabletron
+ 000020 DIAB (Data Intdustrier AB)
+ 000022 Visual Technology
+ 00002A TRW
+ 00005A S & Koch
+ 00005E IANA
+ 000065 Network General
+ 00006B MIPS
+ 000077 MIPS
+ 00007A Ardent
+ 000089 Cayman Systems Gatorbox
+ 000093 Proteon
+ 00009F Ameristar Technology
+ 0000A2 Wellfleet
+ 0000A3 Network Application Technology
+ 0000A6 Network General (internal assignment, not for products)
+ 0000A7 NCD X-terminals
+ 0000A9 Network Systems
+ 0000AA Xerox Xerox machines
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 38]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 0000B3 CIMLinc
+ 0000B7 Dove Fastnet
+ 0000BC Allen-Bradley
+ 0000C0 Western Digital
+ 0000C6 HP Intelligent Networks Operation (formerly Eon Systems)
+ 0000C8 Altos
+ 0000C9 Emulex Terminal Servers
+ 0000D7 Dartmouth College (NED Router)
+ 0000D8 3Com? Novell? PS/2
+ 0000DD Gould
+ 0000DE Unigraph
+ 0000E2 Acer Counterpoint
+ 0000EF Alantec
+ 0000FD High Level Hardvare (Orion, UK)
+ 000102 BBN BBN internal usage (not registered)
+ 001700 Kabel
+ 00802D Xylogics, Inc. Annex terminal servers
+ 00808C Frontier Software Development
+ 00AA00 Intel
+ 00DD00 Ungermann-Bass
+ 00DD01 Ungermann-Bass
+ 020701 MICOM/Interlan UNIBUS or QBUS machines, Apollo
+ 020406 BBN BBN internal usage (not registered)
+ 026086 Satelcom MegaPac (UK)
+ 02608C 3Com IBM PC; Imagen; Valid; Cisco
+ 02CF1F CMC Masscomp; Silicon Graphics; Prime EXL
+ 080002 3Com (Formerly Bridge)
+ 080003 ACC (Advanced Computer Communications)
+ 080005 Symbolics Symbolics LISP machines
+ 080008 BBN
+ 080009 Hewlett-Packard
+ 08000A Nestar Systems
+ 08000B Unisys
+ 080010 AT&T
+ 080011 Tektronix, Inc.
+ 080014 Excelan BBN Butterfly, Masscomp, Silicon Graphics
+ 080017 NSC
+ 08001A Data General
+ 08001B Data General
+ 08001E Apollo
+ 080020 Sun Sun machines
+ 080022 NBI
+ 080025 CDC
+ 080026 Norsk Data (Nord)
+ 080027 PCS Computer Systems GmbH
+ 080028 TI Explorer
+ 08002B DEC
+ 08002E Metaphor
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 39]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 08002F Prime Computer Prime 50-Series LHC300
+ 080036 Intergraph CAE stations
+ 080037 Fujitsu-Xerox
+ 080038 Bull
+ 080039 Spider Systems
+ 080041 DCA Digital Comm. Assoc.
+ 080045 ???? (maybe Xylogics, but they claim not to know this number)
+ 080046 Sony
+ 080047 Sequent
+ 080049 Univation
+ 08004C Encore
+ 08004E BICC
+ 080056 Stanford University
+ 080058 ??? DECsystem-20
+ 08005A IBM
+ 080067 Comdesign
+ 080068 Ridge
+ 080069 Silicon Graphics
+ 08006E Excelan
+ 080075 DDE (Danish Data Elektronik A/S)
+ 08007C Vitalink TransLAN III
+ 080080 XIOS
+ 080086 Imagen/QMS
+ 080087 Xyplex terminal servers
+ 080089 Kinetics AppleTalk-Ethernet interface
+ 08008B Pyramid
+ 08008D XyVision XyVision machines
+ 080090 Retix Inc Bridges
+ 484453 HDS ???
+ 800010 AT&T [misrepresentation of 080010?]
+ AA0000 DEC obsolete
+ AA0001 DEC obsolete
+ AA0002 DEC obsolete
+ AA0003 DEC Global physical address for some DEC machines
+ AA0004 DEC Local logical address for systems running DECNET
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 40]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ETHERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES
+
+ Ethernet Type
+ Address Field Usage
+
+ Multicast Addresses:
+
+ 01-00-5E-00-00-00- 0800 Internet Multicast (RFC-1112) [43]
+ 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FF
+ 01-00-5E-80-00-00- ???? Internet reserved by IANA
+ 01-00-5E-FF-FF-FF
+ 01-80-C2-00-00-00 -802- Spanning tree (for bridges)
+ 09-00-02-04-00-01? 8080? Vitalink printer
+ 09-00-02-04-00-02? 8080? Vitalink management
+ 09-00-09-00-00-01 8005 HP Probe
+ 09-00-09-00-00-01 -802- HP Probe
+ 09-00-09-00-00-04 8005? HP DTC
+ 09-00-1E-00-00-00 8019? Apollo DOMAIN
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-00 6009? DEC MUMPS?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-01 8039? DEC DSM/DTP?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-02 803B? DEC VAXELN?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-03 8038 DEC Lanbridge Traffic Monitor (LTM)
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-04 ???? DEC MAP End System Hello?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-05 ???? DEC MAP Intermediate System Hello?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-06 803D? DEC CSMA/CD Encryption?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-07 8040? DEC NetBios Emulator?
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-0F 6004 DEC Local Area Transport (LAT)
+ 09-00-2B-00-00-1x ???? DEC Experimental
+ 09-00-2B-01-00-00 8038 DEC LanBridge Copy packets (All bridges)
+ 09-00-2B-01-00-01 8038 DEC LanBridge Hello packets (All local bridges)
+ 1 packet per second, sent by the
+ designated LanBridge
+ 09-00-2B-02-00-00 ???? DEC DNA Level 2 Routing Layer routers?
+ 09-00-2B-02-01-00 803C? DEC DNA Naming Service Advertisement?
+ 09-00-2B-02-01-01 803C? DEC DNA Naming Service Solicitation?
+ 09-00-2B-02-01-02 803E? DEC DNA Time Service?
+ 09-00-2B-03-xx-xx ???? DEC default filtering by bridges?
+ 09-00-2B-04-00-00 8041? DEC Local Area System Transport (LAST)?
+ 09-00-2B-23-00-00 803A? DEC Argonaut Console?
+ 09-00-4E-00-00-02? 8137? Novell IPX
+ 09-00-56-00-00-00- ???? Stanford reserved
+ 09-00-56-FE-FF-FF
+ 09-00-56-FF-00-00- 805C Stanford V Kernel, version 6.0
+ 09-00-56-FF-FF-FF
+ 09-00-77-00-00-01 ???? Retix spanning tree bridges
+ 09-00-7C-02-00-05 8080? Vitalink diagnostics
+ 09-00-7C-05-00-01 8080? Vitalink gateway?
+ 0D-1E-15-BA-DD-06 ???? HP
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 41]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ AB-00-00-01-00-00 6001 DEC Maintenance Operation Protocol (MOP)
+ Dump/Load Assistance
+ AB-00-00-02-00-00 6002 DEC Maintenance Operation Protocol (MOP)
+ Remote Console
+ 1 System ID packet every 8-10 minutes,
+ by every:
+ DEC LanBridge
+ DEC DEUNA interface
+ DEC DELUA interface
+ DEC DEQNA interface (in a certain mode)
+ AB-00-00-03-00-00 6003 DECNET Phase IV end node Hello packets
+ 1 packet every 15 seconds, sent by
+ each DECNET host
+ AB-00-00-04-00-00 6003 DECNET Phase IV Router Hello packets
+ 1 packet every 15 seconds, sent by the
+ DECNET router
+ AB-00-00-05-00-00 ???? Reserved DEC
+ through
+ AB-00-03-FF-FF-FF
+ AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport (LAT) - old
+ AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private use
+ AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster groups
+ System Communication Architecture (SCA)
+ CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test protocol (Loopback)
+
+ Broadcast Address:
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0600 XNS packets, Hello or gateway search?
+ 6 packets every 15 seconds, per XNS station
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0800 IP (e.g. RWHOD via UDP) as needed
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0804 CHAOS
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0806 ARP (for IP and CHAOS) as needed
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0BAD Banyan
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 1600 VALID packets, Hello or gateway search?
+ 1 packets every 30 seconds, per VALID station
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 8035 Reverse ARP
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 807C Merit Internodal (INP)
+ FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 809B EtherTalk
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 42]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ XNS PROTOCOL TYPES
+
+ Assigned well-known socket numbers
+
+ Routing Information 1
+ Echo 2
+ Router Error 3
+ Experimental 40-77
+
+ Assigned internet packet types
+
+ Routing Information 1
+ Echo 2
+ Error 3
+ Packet Exchange 4
+ Sequenced Packet 5
+ PUP 12
+ DoD IP 13
+ Experimental 20-37
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 43]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PROTOCOL/TYPE FIELD ASSIGNMENTS
+
+ Below are two tables describing the arrangement of protocol fields or
+ type field assignments so that one could send NS Datagrams on the
+ ARPANET or Internet Datagrams on 10Mb Ethernet, and also protocol and
+ type fields so one could encapsulate each kind of Datagram in the
+ other.
+
+ \ upper| DoD IP | PUP | NS IP |
+ lower \ | | | |
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+ | Type | Type | Type |
+ 3Mb Ethernet | 1001 | 1000 | 3000 |
+ | octal | octal | octal |
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+ | Type | Type | Type |
+ 10 Mb Ethernet| 0800 | 0200 | 0600 |
+ | hex | hex | hex |
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+ | Link | Link | Link |
+ ARPANET | 155 | 152 | 150 |
+ | decimal| decimal| decimal|
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+
+
+
+ \ upper| DoD IP | PUP | NS IP |
+ lower \ | | | |
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+ | |Protocol|Protocol|
+ DoD IP | X | 12 | 22 |
+ | | decimal| decimal|
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+ | | | |
+ PUP | ? | X | ? |
+ | | | |
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+ | Type | Type | |
+ NS IP | 13 | 12 | X |
+ | decimal| decimal| |
+ --------------|--------|--------|--------|
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 44]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PRONET 80 TYPE NUMBERS
+
+ Below is the current list of PRONET 80 Type Numbers. Note: a
+ protocol that is on this list does not necessarily mean that there is
+ any implementation of it on ProNET.
+
+ Of these, protocols 1, 14, and 20 are the only ones that have ever
+ been seen in ARP packets.
+
+ For reference, the header is (one byte/line):
+
+ destination hardware address
+ source hardware address
+ data link header version (2)
+ data link header protocol number
+ data link header reserved (0)
+ data link header reserved (0)
+
+ Some protocols have been known to tuck stuff in the reserved fields.
+
+ Those who need a protocol number on ProNET-10/80 should contact John
+ Shriver (jas@proteon.com).
+
+ 1 IP
+ 2 IP with trailing headers
+ 3 Address Resoloution Protocol
+ 4 Proteon HDLC
+ 5 VAX Debugging Protocol (MIT)
+ 10 Novell NetWare (IPX and pre-IPX) (old format,
+ 3 byte trailer)
+ 11 Vianetix
+ 12 PUP
+ 13 Watstar protocol (University of Waterloo)
+ 14 XNS
+ 15 Diganostics
+ 16 Echo protocol (link level)
+ 17 Banyan Vines
+ 20 DECnet (DEUNA Emulation)
+ 21 Chaosnet
+ 23 IEEE 802.2 or ISO 8802/2 Data Link
+ 24 Reverse Address Resolution Protocol
+ 29 TokenVIEW-10
+ 31 AppleTalk LAP Data Packet
+ 33 Cornell Boot Server Location Protocol
+ 34 Novell NetWare IPX (new format, no trailer,
+ new XOR checksum)
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 45]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL PARAMETERS
+
+ The Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) specified in RFC-826 [88] has
+ several parameters. The assigned values for these parameters are
+ listed here.
+
+ Assignments:
+
+ Operation Code (op)
+
+ 1 REQUEST
+ 2 REPLY
+
+ Hardware Type (hrd)
+
+ Type Description References
+ ---- ----------- ----------
+ 1 Ethernet (10Mb) [JBP]
+ 2 Experimental Ethernet (3Mb) [JBP]
+ 3 Amateur Radio AX.25 [PXK]
+ 4 Proteon ProNET Token Ring [JBP]
+ 5 Chaos [GXP]
+ 6 IEEE 802 Networks [JBP]
+ 7 ARCNET [JBP]
+ 8 Hyperchannel [JBP]
+ 9 Lanstar [TU]
+ 10 Autonet Short Address [MXB1]
+ 11 LocalTalk [LXE]
+ 12 LocalNet (IBM PCNet or SYTEK LocalNET) [JXM]
+
+ Protocol Type (pro)
+
+ Use the same codes as listed in the section called "Ethernet
+ Numbers of Interest" (all hardware types use this code set for the
+ protocol type).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 46]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ REVERSE ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL OPERATION CODES
+
+ The Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP) specified in RFC-903
+ [48] has the following operation codes:
+
+ Assignments:
+
+ Operation Code (op)
+
+ 3 request Reverse
+ 4 reply Reverse
+
+
+ DYNAMIC REVERSE ARP
+
+ Assignments:
+
+ Operation Code (op)
+
+ 5 DRARP-Request
+ 6 DRARP-Reply
+ 7 DRARP-Error
+
+ For further information, contact: David Brownell
+ (suneast!helium!db@Sun.COM).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 47]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ X.25 TYPE NUMBERS
+
+ CCITT defines the high order two bits of the first octet of call user
+ data as follows:
+
+ 00 - Used for other CCITT recomendations (such as X.29)
+ 01 - Reserved for use by "national" administrative
+ authorities
+ 10 - Reserved for use by international administrative authoorities
+ 11 - Reserved for arbitrary use between consenting DTEs
+
+ Call User Data (hex) Protocol Reference
+ ------------------- -------- ---------
+
+ 01 PAD [GS2]
+ C5 Blacker front-end descr dev [AGM]
+ CC IP [69,AGM]*
+ CD ISO-IP [AGM]
+
+ * NOTE: ISO SC6/WG2 approved assignment in ISO 9577 (January 1990).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 48]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PUBLIC DATA NETWORK NUMBERS
+
+One of the Internet Class A Networks is the international system of
+Public Data Networks. This section lists the mapping between the
+Internet Addresses and the Public Data Network Addresses (X.121).
+
+The numbers below are assigned for networks that are connected to the
+Internet, and for independent networks. These independent networks
+are marked with an asterisk preceding the number.
+
+Assignments:
+
+ * Internet Public Data Net Description References
+ - -------------- ----------------- ----------- ----------
+ 014.000.000.000 Reserved [JBP]
+ 014.000.000.001 3110-317-00035 00 PURDUE-TN [TN]
+ 014.000.000.002 3110-608-00027 00 UWISC-TN [TN]
+ 014.000.000.003 3110-302-00024 00 UDEL-TN [TN]
+ 014.000.000.004 2342-192-00149 23 UCL-VTEST [PK]
+ 014.000.000.005 2342-192-00300 23 UCL-TG [PK]
+ 014.000.000.006 2342-192-00300 25 UK-SATNET [PK]
+ 014.000.000.007 3110-608-00024 00 UWISC-IBM [MS56]
+ 014.000.000.008 3110-213-00045 00 RAND-TN [MO2]
+ 014.000.000.009 2342-192-00300 23 UCL-CS [PK]
+ 014.000.000.010 3110-617-00025 00 BBN-VAN-GW [JD21]
+ *014.000.000.011 2405-015-50300 00 CHALMERS [UXB]
+ 014.000.000.012 3110-713-00165 00 RICE [PAM6]
+ 014.000.000.013 3110-415-00261 00 DECWRL [PAM6]
+ 014.000.000.014 3110-408-00051 00 IBM-SJ [SA1]
+ 014.000.000.015 2041-117-01000 00 SHAPE [JFW]
+ 014.000.000.016 2628-153-90075 00 DFVLR4-X25 [GB7]
+ 014.000.000.017 3110-213-00032 00 ISI-VAN-GW [JD21]
+ 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25 [GB7]
+ 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25 [JFW]
+ 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET [AXH]
+ 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1 [VXT]
+ 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25 [GB7]
+ *014.000.000.023 2624-589-00908 01 ECRC-X25 [PXD]
+ 014.000.000.024 2342-905-24242 83 UK-MOD-RSRE [JXE2]
+ 014.000.000.025 2342-905-24242 82 UK-VAN-RSRE [AXM]
+ 014.000.000.026 2624-522-80329 05 DFVLRSUN-X25 [GB7]
+ 014.000.000.027 2624-457-11015 90 SELETFMSUN-X25 [BXD]
+ 014.000.000.028 3110-408-00146 00 CDC-SVL [RAM57]
+ 014.000.000.029 2222-551-04400 00 SUN-CNUCE [ABB2]
+ 014.000.000.030 2222-551-04500 00 ICNUCEVM-CNUCE [ABB2]
+ 014.000.000.031 2222-551-04600 00 SPARE-CNUCE [ABB2]
+ 014.000.000.032 2222-551-04700 00 ICNUCEVX-CNUCE [ABB2]
+ 014.000.000.033 2222-551-04524 00 CISCO-CNUCE [ABB2]
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 49]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ 014.000.000.034 2342-313-00260 90 SPIDER-GW [AD67]
+ 014.000.000.035 2342-313-00260 91 SPIDER-EXP [AD67]
+ 014.000.000.036 2342-225-00101 22 PRAXIS-X25A [TXR]
+ 014.000.000.037 2342-225-00101 23 PRAXIS-X25B [TXR]
+ 014.000.000.038 2403-712-30250 00 DIAB-TABY-GW [FXB]
+ 014.000.000.039 2403-715-30100 00 DIAB-LKP-GW [FXB]
+ 014.000.000.040 2401-881-24038 00 DIAB-TABY1-GW [FXB]
+ 014.000.000.041 2041-170-10060 00 STC [TC27]
+ 014.000.000.042-014.255.255.254 Unassigned [JBP]
+ 014.255.255.255 Reserved [JBP]
+
+ The standard for transmission of IP datagrams over the Public Data
+ Network is specified in RFC-877 [69].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 50]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ TELNET OPTIONS
+
+The Telnet Protocol has a number of options that may be negotiated.
+These options are listed here. "Official Internet Protocols" [118]
+provides more detailed information.
+
+ Options Name References
+ ------- ----------------------- ----------
+ 0 Binary Transmission [110,JBP]
+ 1 Echo [111,JBP]
+ 2 Reconnection [42,JBP]
+ 3 Suppress Go Ahead [114,JBP]
+ 4 Approx Message Size Negotiation [133,JBP]
+ 5 Status [113,JBP]
+ 6 Timing Mark [115,JBP]
+ 7 Remote Controlled Trans and Echo [107,JBP]
+ 8 Output Line Width [40,JBP]
+ 9 Output Page Size [41,JBP]
+ 10 Output Carriage-Return Disposition [28,JBP]
+ 11 Output Horizontal Tab Stops [32,JBP]
+ 12 Output Horizontal Tab Disposition [31,JBP]
+ 13 Output Formfeed Disposition [29,JBP]
+ 14 Output Vertical Tabstops [34,JBP]
+ 15 Output Vertical Tab Disposition [33,JBP]
+ 16 Output Linefeed Disposition [30,JBP]
+ 17 Extended ASCII [136,JBP]
+ 18 Logout [25,MRC]
+ 19 Byte Macro [35,JBP]
+ 20 Data Entry Terminal [145,38,JBP]
+ 22 SUPDUP [26,27,MRC]
+ 22 SUPDUP Output [51,MRC]
+ 23 Send Location [68,EAK1]
+ 24 Terminal Type [128,MS56]
+ 25 End of Record [103,JBP]
+ 26 TACACS User Identification [1,BA4]
+ 27 Output Marking [125,SXS]
+ 28 Terminal Location Number [84,RN6]
+ 29 Telnet 3270 Regime [116,JXR]
+ 30 X.3 PAD [70,SL70]
+ 31 Negotiate About Window Size [139,DW183]
+ 32 Terminal Speed [57,CLH3]
+ 33 Remote Flow Control [58,CLH3]
+ 34 Linemode [9,DB14]
+ 35 X Display Location [75,GM23]
+ 255 Extended-Options-List [109,JBP]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 51]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ MAIL ENCRYPTION TYPES
+
+ RFC-822 specifies that Encryption Types for mail may be assigned.
+ There are currently no RFC-822 encryption types assigned. Please use
+ instead the Mail Privacy procedures defined in [71,72,66].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 52]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ MACHINE NAMES
+
+ These are the Official Machine Names as they appear in the Domain
+ Name System WKS records and the NIC Host Table. Their use is
+ described in RFC-952 [53].
+
+ A machine name or CPU type may be up to 40 characters taken from the
+ set of uppercase letters, digits, and the two punctuation characters
+ hyphen and slash. It must start with a letter, and end with a letter
+ or digit.
+
+
+
+
+
+ ALTO DEC-1090
+ ALTOS-6800 DEC-1090B
+ AMDAHL-V7 DEC-1090T
+ APOLLO DEC-2020T
+ ATARI-104ST DEC-2040
+ ATT-3B1 DEC-2040T
+ ATT-3B20 DEC-2050T
+ ATT-7300 DEC-2060
+ BBN-C/60 DEC-2060T
+ BURROUGHS-B/29 DEC-2065
+ BURROUGHS-B/4800 DEC-FALCON
+ BUTTERFLY DEC-KS10
+ C/30 DEC-VAX-11730
+ C/70 DORADO
+ CADLINC DPS8/70M
+ CADR ELXSI-6400
+ CDC-170 EVEREX-386
+ CDC-170/750 FOONLY-F2
+ CDC-173 FOONLY-F3
+ CELERITY-1200 FOONLY-F4
+ CLUB-386 GOULD
+ COMPAQ-386/20 GOULD-6050
+ COMTEN-3690 GOULD-6080
+ CP8040 GOULD-9050
+ CRAY-1 GOULD-9080
+ CRAY-X/MP H-316
+ CRAY-2 H-60/68
+ CTIWS-117 H-68
+ DANDELION H-68/80
+ DEC-10 H-89
+ DEC-1050 HONEYWELL-DPS-6
+ DEC-1077 HONEYWELL-DPS-8/70
+ DEC-1080 HP3000
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 53]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ HP3000/64 PDP-11
+ IBM-158 PDP-11/3
+ IBM-360/67 PDP-11/23
+ IBM-370/3033 PDP-11/24
+ IBM-3081 PDP-11/34
+ IBM-3084QX PDP-11/40
+ IBM-3101 PDP-11/44
+ IBM-4331 PDP-11/45
+ IBM-4341 PDP-11/50
+ IBM-4361 PDP-11/70
+ IBM-4381 PDP-11/73
+ IBM-4956 PE-7/32
+ IBM-6152 PE-3205
+ IBM-PC PERQ
+ IBM-PC/AT PLEXUS-P/60
+ IBM-PC/RT PLI
+ IBM-PC/XT PLURIBUS
+ IBM-SERIES/1 PRIME-2350
+ IMAGEN PRIME-2450
+ IMAGEN-8/300 PRIME-2755
+ IMSAI PRIME-9655
+ INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS PRIME-9755
+ INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS-68K PRIME-9955II
+ INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS-CREATOR PRIME-2250
+ INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS-CREATOR-8 PRIME-2655
+ INTEL-386 PRIME-9955
+ INTEL-IPSC PRIME-9950
+ IS-1 PRIME-9650
+ IS-68010 PRIME-9750
+ LMI PRIME-2250
+ LSI-11 PRIME-750
+ LSI-11/2 PRIME-850
+ LSI-11/23 PRIME-550II
+ LSI-11/73 PYRAMID-90
+ M68000 PYRAMID-90MX
+ MAC-II PYRAMID-90X
+ MASSCOMP RIDGE
+ MC500 RIDGE-32
+ MC68000 RIDGE-32C
+ MICROPORT ROLM-1666
+ MICROVAX S1-MKIIA
+ MICROVAX-I SMI
+ MV/8000 SEQUENT-BALANCE-8000
+ NAS3-5 SIEMENS
+ NCR-COMTEN-3690 SILICON-GRAPHICS
+ NEXT/N1000-316 SILICON-GRAPHICS-IRIS
+ NOW SGI-IRIS-2400
+ ONYX-Z8000 SGI-IRIS-2500
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 54]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ SGI-IRIS-3010 SUN-3/60
+ SGI-IRIS-3020 SUN-3/75
+ SGI-IRIS-3030 SUN-3/80
+ SGI-IRIS-3110 SUN-3/110
+ SGI-IRIS-3115 SUN-3/140
+ SGI-IRIS-3120 SUN-3/150
+ SGI-IRIS-3130 SUN-3/160
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/20 SUN-3/180
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/20G SUN-3/200
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/25 SUN-3/260
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/25G SUN-3/280
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/25S SUN-3/470
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/50 SUN-3/480
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/50G SUN-4/60
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/50GT SUN-4/110
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/60 SUN-4/150
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/60G SUN-4/200
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/60T SUN-4/260
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/60GT SUN-4/280
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/70 SUN-4/330
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/70G SUN-4/370
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/70GT SUN-4/390
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/80GT SUN-50
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/80S SUN-100
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/120GTX SUN-120
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/120S SUN-130
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/210GTX SUN-150
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/210S SUN-170
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/220GTX SUN-386i/250
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/220S SUN-68000
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/240GTX SYMBOLICS-3600
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/240S SYMBOLICS-3670
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/280GTX SYMMETRIC-375
+ SGI-IRIS-4D/280S SYMULT
+ SGI-IRIS-CS/12 TANDEM-TXP
+ SGI-IRIS-4SERVER-8 TANDY-6000
+ SPERRY-DCP/10 TEK-6130
+ SUN TI-EXPLORER
+ SUN-2 TP-4000
+ SUN-2/50 TRS-80
+ SUN-2/100 UNIVAC-1100
+ SUN-2/120 UNIVAC-1100/60
+ SUN-2/130 UNIVAC-1100/62
+ SUN-2/140 UNIVAC-1100/63
+ SUN-2/150 UNIVAC-1100/64
+ SUN-2/160 UNIVAC-1100/70
+ SUN-2/170 UNIVAC-1160
+ SUN-3/50 UNKNOWN
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 55]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ VAX-11/725
+ VAX-11/730
+ VAX-11/750
+ VAX-11/780
+ VAX-11/785
+ VAX-11/790
+ VAX-11/8600
+ VAX-8600
+ WANG-PC002
+ WANG-VS100
+ WANG-VS400
+ WYSE-386
+ XEROX-1108
+ XEROX-8010
+ ZENITH-148
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 56]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ SYSTEM NAMES
+
+ These are the Official System Names as they appear in the Domain Name
+ System WKS records and the NIC Host Table. Their use is described in
+ RFC-952 [53].
+
+ A system name may be up to 40 characters taken from the set of upper-
+ case letters, digits, and the two punctuation characters hyphen and
+ slash. It must start with a letter, and end with a letter or digit.
+
+ AEGIS MACOS TP3010
+ APOLLO MINOS TRSDOS
+ BS-2000 MOS ULTRIX
+ CEDAR MPE5 UNIX
+ CGW MSDOS UNIX-BSD
+ CHORUS MULTICS UNIX-V1AT
+ CHRYSALIS MVS UNIX-V
+ CMOS MVS/SP UNIX-V.1
+ CMS NEXUS UNIX-V.2
+ COS NMS UNIX-V.3
+ CPIX NONSTOP UNIX-PC
+ CTOS NOS-2 UNKNOWN
+ CTSS OS/DDP UT2D
+ DCN OS4 V
+ DDNOS OS86 VM
+ DOMAIN OSX VM/370
+ DOS PCDOS VM/CMS
+ EDX PERQ/OS VM/SP
+ ELF PLI VMS
+ EMBOS PSDOS/MIT VMS/EUNICE
+ EMMOS PRIMOS VRTX
+ EPOS RMX/RDOS WAITS
+ FOONEX ROS WANG
+ FUZZ RSX11M X11R3
+ GCOS SATOPS XDE
+ GPOS SCO-XENIX/386 XENIX
+ HDOS SCS
+ IMAGEN SIMP
+ INTERCOM SUN
+ IMPRESS SUN OS 3.5
+ INTERLISP SUN OS 4.0
+ IOS SWIFT
+ IRIX TAC
+ ISI-68020 TANDEM
+ ITS TENEX
+ LISP TOPS10
+ LISPM TOPS20
+ LOCUS TOS
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 57]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PROTOCOL AND SERVICE NAMES
+
+ These are the Official Protocol Names as they appear in the Domain
+ Name System WKS records and the NIC Host Table. Their use is
+ described in RFC-952 [53].
+
+ A protocol or service may be up to 40 characters taken from the set
+ of uppercase letters, digits, and the punctuation character hyphen.
+ It must start with a letter, and end with a letter or digit.
+
+ ARGUS - ARGUS Protocol
+ ARP - Address Resolution Protocol
+ AUTH - Authentication Service
+ BBN-RCC-MON - BBN RCC Monitoring
+ BL-IDM - Britton Lee Intelligent Database Machine
+ BOOTP - Bootstrap Protocol
+ BOOTPC - Bootstrap Protocol Client
+ BOOTPS - Bootstrap Protocol Server
+ BR-SAT-MON - Backroom SATNET Monitoring
+ CFTP - CFTP
+ CHAOS - CHAOS Protocol
+ CHARGEN - Character Generator Protocol
+ CISCO-FNA - CISCO FNATIVE
+ CISCO-TNA - CISCO TNATIVE
+ CISCO-SYS - CISCO SYSMAINT
+ CLOCK - DCNET Time Server Protocol
+ CMOT - Common Mgmnt Info Services and Protocol over TCP/IP
+ COOKIE-JAR - Authentication Scheme
+ CSNET-NS - CSNET Mailbox Nameserver Protocol
+ DAYTIME - Daytime Protocol
+ DCN-MEAS - DCN Measurement Subsystems Protocol
+ DCP - Device Control Protocol
+ DGP - Dissimilar Gateway Protocol
+ DISCARD - Discard Protocol
+ DOMAIN - Domain Name System
+ ECHO - Echo Protocol
+ EGP - Exterior Gateway Protocol
+ EMCON - Emission Control Protocol
+ EMFIS-CNTL - EMFIS Control Service
+ EMFIS-DATA - EMFIS Data Service
+ FINGER - Finger Protocol
+ FTP - File Transfer Protocol
+ FTP-DATA - File Transfer Protocol Data
+ GGP - Gateway Gateway Protocol
+ GRAPHICS - Graphics Protocol
+ HMP - Host Monitoring Protocol
+ HOST2-NS - Host2 Name Server
+ HOSTNAME - Hostname Protocol
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 58]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol
+ IGMP - Internet Group Management Protocol
+ IGP - Interior Gateway Protocol
+ IMAP2 - Interim Mail Access Protocol version 2
+ INGRES-NET - INGRES-NET Service
+ IP - Internet Protocol
+ IPCU - Internet Packet Core Utility
+ IPPC - Internet Pluribus Packet Core
+ IP-ARC - Internet Protocol on ARCNET
+ IP-ARPA - Internet Protocol on ARPANET
+ IP-DC - Internet Protocol on DC Networks
+ IP-DVMRP - Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol
+ IP-E - Internet Protocol on Ethernet Networks
+ IP-EE - Internet Protocol on Exp. Ethernet Nets
+ IP-FDDI - Transmission of IP over FDDI
+ IP-HC - Internet Protocol on Hyperchannnel
+ IP-IEEE - Internet Protocol on IEEE 802
+ IP-IPX - Transmission of 802.2 over IPX Networks
+ IP-MTU - IP MTU Discovery Options
+ IP-NETBIOS - Internet Protocol Datagrams over NetBIOS Networks
+ IP-SLIP - Transmission of IP over Serial Lines
+ IP-WB - Internet Protocol on Wideband Network
+ IP-X25 - Internet Protocol on X.25 Networks
+ IRTP - Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol
+ ISI-GL - ISI Graphics Language Protocol
+ ISO-TP4 - ISO Transport Protocol Class 4
+ ISO-TSAP - ISO TSAP
+ LA-MAINT - IMP Logical Address Maintenance
+ LARP - Locus Address Resoultion Protocol
+ LDP - Loader Debugger Protocol
+ LEAF-1 - Leaf-1 Protocol
+ LEAF-2 - Leaf-2 Protocol
+ LINK - Link Protocol
+ LOC-SRV - Location Service
+ LOGIN - Login Host Protocol
+ MAIL - Format of Electronic Mail Messages
+ MERIT-INP - MERIT Internodal Protocol
+ METAGRAM - Metagram Relay
+ MIB - Management Information Base
+ MIT-ML-DEV - MIT ML Device
+ MFE-NSP - MFE Network Services Protocol
+ MIT-SUBNET - MIT Subnet Support
+ MIT-DOV - MIT Dover Spooler
+ MPM - Internet Message Protocol (Multimedia Mail)
+ MPM-FLAGS - MPM Flags Protocol
+ MPM-SND - MPM Send Protocol
+ MSG-AUTH - MSG Authentication Protocol
+ MSG-ICP - MSG ICP Protocol
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 59]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ MUX - Multiplexing Protocol
+ NAMESERVER - Host Name Server
+ NETBIOS-DGM - NETBIOS Datagram Service
+ NETBIOS-NS - NETBIOS Name Service
+ NETBIOS-SSN - NETBIOS Session Service
+ NETBLT - Bulk Data Transfer Protocol
+ NETED - Network Standard Text Editor
+ NETRJS - Remote Job Service
+ NI-FTP - NI File Transfer Protocol
+ NI-MAIL - NI Mail Protocol
+ NICNAME - Who Is Protocol
+ NFILE - A File Access Protocol
+ NNTP - Network News Transfer Protocol
+ NSW-FE - NSW User System Front End
+ NTP - Network Time Protocol
+ NVP-II - Network Voice Protocol
+ OSPF - Open Shortest Path First Interior GW Protocol
+ PCMAIL - Pcmail Transport Protocol
+ POP2 - Post Office Protocol - Version 2
+ POP3 - Post Office Protocol - Version 3
+ PPP - Point-to-Point Protocol
+ PRM - Packet Radio Measurement
+ PUP - PUP Protocol
+ PWDGEN - Password Generator Protocol
+ QUOTE - Quote of the Day Protocol
+ RARP - A Reverse Address Resolution Protocol
+ RATP - Reliable Asynchronous Transfer Protocol
+ RDP - Reliable Data Protocol
+ RIP - Routing Information Protocol
+ RJE - Remote Job Entry
+ RLP - Resource Location Protocol
+ RTELNET - Remote Telnet Service
+ RVD - Remote Virtual Disk Protocol
+ SAT-EXPAK - Satnet and Backroom EXPAK
+ SAT-MON - SATNET Monitoring
+ SEP - Sequential Exchange Protocol
+ SFTP - Simple File Transfer Protocol
+ SGMP - Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol
+ SNMP - Simple Network Management Protocol
+ SMI - Structure of Management Information
+ SMTP - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
+ SQLSRV - SQL Service
+ ST - Stream Protocol
+ STATSRV - Statistics Service
+ SU-MIT-TG - SU/MIT Telnet Gateway Protocol
+ SUN-RPC - SUN Remote Procedure Call
+ SUPDUP - SUPDUP Protocol
+ SUR-MEAS - Survey Measurement
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 60]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ SWIFT-RVF - Remote Virtual File Protocol
+ TACACS-DS - TACACS-Database Service
+ TACNEWS - TAC News
+ TCP - Transmission Control Protocol
+ TELNET - Telnet Protocol
+ TFTP - Trivial File Transfer Protocol
+ THINWIRE - Thinwire Protocol
+ TIME - Time Server Protocol
+ TP-TCP - ISO Transport Service on top of the TCP
+ TRUNK-1 - Trunk-1 Protocol
+ TRUNK-2 - Trunk-2 Protocol
+ UCL - University College London Protocol
+ UDP - User Datagram Protocol
+ NNTP - Network News Transfer Protocol
+ USERS - Active Users Protocol
+ UUCP-PATH - UUCP Path Service
+ VIA-FTP - VIA Systems-File Transfer Protocol
+ VISA - VISA Protocol
+ VMTP - Versatile Message Transaction Protocol
+ WB-EXPAK - Wideband EXPAK
+ WB-MON - Wideband Monitoring
+ XNET - Cross Net Debugger
+ XNS-IDP - Xerox NS IDP
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 61]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ TERMINAL TYPE NAMES
+
+These are the Official Terminal Type Names. Their use is described in
+RFC-930 [128]. The maximum length of a name is 40 characters.
+
+A terminal names may be up to 40 characters taken from the set of upper-
+case letters, digits, and the two punctuation characters hyphen and
+slash. It must start with a letter, and end with a letter or digit.
+
+ ADDS-CONSUL-980 DATAMEDIA-1521
+ ADDS-REGENT-100 DATAMEDIA-2500
+ ADDS-REGENT-20 DATAMEDIA-3025
+ ADDS-REGENT-200 DATAMEDIA-3025A
+ ADDS-REGENT-25 DATAMEDIA-3045
+ ADDS-REGENT-40 DATAMEDIA-3045A
+ ADDS-REGENT-60 DATAMEDIA-DT80/1
+ ADDS-VIEWPOINT DATAPOINT-2200
+ ADDS-VIEWPOINT-60 DATAPOINT-3000
+ AED-512 DATAPOINT-3300
+ AMPEX-DIALOGUE-210 DATAPOINT-3360
+ AMPEX-DIALOGUE-80 DEC-DECWRITER-I
+ AMPEX-210 DEC-DECWRITER-II
+ AMPEX-230 DEC-GIGI
+ ANDERSON-JACOBSON-510 DEC-GT40
+ ANDERSON-JACOBSON-630 DEC-GT40A
+ ANDERSON-JACOBSON-832 DEC-GT42
+ ANDERSON-JACOBSON-841 DEC-LA120
+ ANN-ARBOR-AMBASSADOR DEC-LA30
+ ANSI DEC-LA36
+ ARDS DEC-LA38
+ BITGRAPH DEC-VT05
+ BUSSIPLEXER DEC-VT100
+ CALCOMP-565 DEC-VT101
+ CDC-456 DEC-VT102
+ CDI-1030 DEC-VT125
+ CDI-1203 DEC-VT131
+ C-ITOH-101 DEC-VT132
+ C-ITOH-50 DEC-VT200
+ C-ITOH-80 DEC-VT220
+ CLNZ DEC-VT240
+ COMPUCOLOR-II DEC-VT241
+ CONCEPT-100 DEC-VT300
+ CONCEPT-104 DEC-VT320
+ CONCEPT-108 DEC-VT340
+ DATA-100 DEC-VT50
+ DATA-GENERAL-6053 DEC-VT50H
+ DATAGRAPHIX-132A DEC-VT52
+ DATAMEDIA-1520 DEC-VT55
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 62]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ DEC-VT61 HP-2649A
+ DEC-VT62 IBM-1050
+ DELTA-DATA-5000 IBM-2741
+ DELTA-DATA-NIH-7000 IBM-3101
+ DELTA-TELTERM-2 IBM-3101-10
+ DIABLO-1620 IBM-3151
+ DIABLO-1640 IBM-3275-2
+ DIGILOG-333 IBM-3276-2
+ DTC-300S IBM-3276-3
+ DTC-382 IBM-3276-4
+ EDT-1200 IBM-3277-2
+ EXECUPORT-4000 IBM-3278-2
+ EXECUPORT-4080 IBM-3278-3
+ FACIT-TWIST-4440 IBM-3278-4
+ FREEDOM-100 IBM-3278-5
+ FREEDOM-110 IBM-3279-2
+ FREEDOM-200 IBM-3279-3
+ GENERAL-TERMINAL-100A IBM-5151
+ GENERAL-TERMINAL-101 IBM-5154
+ GIPSI-TX-M IBM-5081
+ GIPSI-TX-ME IBM-6153
+ GIPSI-TX-C4 IBM-6154
+ GIPSI-TX-C8 IBM-6155
+ GSI IBM-AED
+ HAZELTINE-1420 IBM-3278-2-E
+ HAZELTINE-1500 IBM-3278-3-E
+ HAZELTINE-1510 IBM-3278-4-E
+ HAZELTINE-1520 IBM-3278-5-E
+ HAZELTINE-1552 IBM-3279-2-E
+ HAZELTINE-2000 IBM-3279-3-E
+ HAZELTINE-ESPRIT IMLAC
+ HP-2392 INFOTON-100
+ HP-2621 INFOTON-400
+ HP-2621A INFOTONKAS
+ HP-2621P ISC-8001
+ HP-2623 LSI-ADM-1
+ HP-2626 LSI-ADM-11
+ HP-2626A LSI-ADM-12
+ HP-2626P LSI-ADM-2
+ HP-2627 LSI-ADM-20
+ HP-2640 LSI-ADM-22
+ HP-2640A LSI-ADM-220
+ HP-2640B LSI-ADM-3
+ HP-2645 LSI-ADM-31
+ HP-2645A LSI-ADM-3A
+ HP-2648 LSI-ADM-42
+ HP-2648A LSI-ADM-5
+ HP-2649 MEMOREX-1240
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 63]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ MICROBEE TELETEC-DATASCREEN
+ MICROTERM-ACT-IV TELETERM-1030
+ MICROTERM-ACT-V TELETYPE-33
+ MICROTERM-ERGO-301 TELETYPE-35
+ MICROTERM-MIME-1 TELETYPE-37
+ MICROTERM-MIME-2 TELETYPE-38
+ MICROTERM-ACT-5A TELETYPE-40
+ MICROTERM-TWIST TELETYPE-43
+ NEC-5520 TELEVIDEO-910
+ NETRONICS TELEVIDEO-912
+ NETWORK-VIRTUAL-TERMINAL TELEVIDEO-920
+ OMRON-8025AG TELEVIDEO-920B
+ PERKIN-ELMER-550 TELEVIDEO-920C
+ PERKIN-ELMER-1100 TELEVIDEO-925
+ PERKIN-ELMER-1200 TELEVIDEO-955
+ PERQ TELEVIDEO-950
+ PLASMA-PANEL TELEVIDEO-970
+ QUME-SPRINT-5 TELEVIDEO-975
+ QUME-101 TERMINET-1200
+ QUME-102 TERMINET-300
+ SOROC TI-700
+ SOROC-120 TI-733
+ SOUTHWEST-TECHNICAL-PRODUCTS-CT82 TI-735
+ SUN TI-743
+ SUPERBEE TI-745
+ SUPERBEE-III-M TI-800
+ TEC TYCOM
+ TEKTRONIX-4006 UNIVAC-DCT-500
+ TEKTRONIX-4010 VIDEO-SYSTEMS-1200
+ TEKTRONIX-4012 VIDEO-SYSTEMS-5000
+ TEKTRONIX-4013 VOLKER-CRAIG-303
+ TEKTRONIX-4014 VOLKER-CRAIG-303A
+ TEKTRONIX-4023 VOLKER-CRAIG-404
+ TEKTRONIX-4024 VISUAL-200
+ TEKTRONIX-4025 VISUAL-55
+ TEKTRONIX-4027 WYSE-30
+ TEKTRONIX-4105 WYSE-50
+ TEKTRONIX-4107 WYSE-60
+ TEKTRONIX-4110 WYSE-75
+ TEKTRONIX-4112 WYSE-85
+ TEKTRONIX-4113 XEROX-1720
+ TEKTRONIX-4114 XTERM
+ TEKTRONIX-4115 ZENITH-H19
+ TEKTRONIX-4125 ZENITH-Z29
+ TEKTRONIX-4404 ZENTEC-30
+ TELERAY-1061
+ TELERAY-3700
+ TELERAY-3800
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 64]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ DOCUMENTS
+
+
+ [1] Anderson, B., "TACACS User Identification Telnet Option",
+ RFC-927, BBN, December 1984.
+
+ [2] BBN, "Specifications for the Interconnection of a Host and an
+ IMP", Report 1822, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge,
+ Massachusetts, revised, December 1981.
+
+ [3] BBN, "User Manual for TAC User Database Tool", Bolt Beranek
+ and Newman, September 1984.
+
+ [4] Ben-Artzi, Amatzia, "Network Management for TCP/IP Network: An
+ Overview", 3Com, May 1988.
+
+ [5] Bennett, C., "A Simple NIFTP-Based Mail System", IEN 169,
+ University College, London, January 1981.
+
+ [6] Bhushan, A., "A Report on the Survey Project", RFC-530,
+ NIC 17375, June 1973.
+
+ [7] Bisbey, R., D. Hollingworth, and B. Britt, "Graphics Language
+ (version 2.1)", ISI/TM-80-18, Information Sciences Institute,
+ July 1980.
+
+ [8] Boggs, D., J. Shoch, E. Taft, and R. Metcalfe, "PUP: An
+ Internetwork Architecture", XEROX Palo Alto Research Center,
+ CSL-79-10, July 1979; also in IEEE Transactions on
+ Communication, Volume COM-28, Number 4, April 1980.
+
+ [9] Borman, D., Editor, "Telnet Linemode Option",
+ RFC 1116, Cray Research, Inc., August 1989.
+
+ [10] Braden, R., "NETRJS Protocol", RFC-740, NIC 42423,
+ Information Sciences Institute, November 1977.
+
+ [11] Braden, R., and J. Postel, "Requirements for Internet
+ Gateways", RFC-1009, Obsoletes RFC-985, Information Sciences
+ Institute, June 1987.
+
+ [12] Bressler, B., "Remote Job Entry Protocol", RFC-407,
+ NIC 12112, October 1972.
+
+ [13] Bressler, R., "Inter-Entity Communication -- An Experiment",
+ RFC-441, NIC 13773, January 1973.
+
+ [14] Butler, M., J. Postel, D. Chase, J. Goldberger, and
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 65]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ J. K. Reynolds, "Post Office Protocol - Version 2", RFC-937,
+ Information Sciences Institute, February 1985.
+
+ [15] Case, J., M. Fedor, M. Schoffstall, and C. Davin,
+ "A Simple Network Management Protocol", RFC-1098,
+ (Obsoletes RFC-1067), University of Tennessee at
+ Knoxville, NYSERNet, Inc., Rensselaer Polytechnic
+ Institute, and MIT Laboratory for Computer Science,
+ April 1989.
+
+ [16] Cass, D., and M. Rose, "ISO Transport Services on Top of
+ the TCP", RFC-983, NTRC, April 1986.
+
+ [17] Cheriton, D., "VMTP: Versatile Message Transaction
+ Protocol Specification", RFC-1045, pgs 103 & 104,
+ Stanford University, February 1988.
+
+ [18] Cisco Systems, "Gateway Server Reference Manual", Manual
+ Revision B, January 10, 1988.
+
+ [19] Clark, D., "PCMAIL: A Distributed Mail System for Personal
+ Computers", RFC-984, MIT, May 1986.
+
+ [20] Clark, D., M. Lambert, and L. Zhang, "NETBLT: A Bulk Data
+ Transfer Protocol", RFC-969, MIT Laboratory for Computer
+ Science, December 1985.
+
+ [21] Cohen, D., "On Holy Wars and a Plea for Peace", IEEE Computer
+ Magazine, October 1981.
+
+ [22] Cohen, D., "Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol",
+ RFC-741, ISI/RR 7539, Information Sciences Institute,
+ March 1976.
+
+ [23] Cohen, D. and J. Postel, "Multiplexing Protocol", IEN 90,
+ Information Sciences Institute, May 1979.
+
+ [24] COMPASS, "Semi-Annual Technical Report", CADD-7603-0411,
+ Massachusetts Computer Associates, 4 March 1976. Also as,
+ "National Software Works, Status Report No. 1,"
+ RADC-TR-76-276, Volume 1, September 1976. And COMPASS. "Second
+ Semi-Annual Report," CADD-7608-1611, Massachusetts Computer
+ Associates, August 1976.
+
+ [25] Crispin, M., "Telnet Logout Option", Stanford University-AI,
+ RFC-727, April 1977.
+
+ [26] Crispin, M., "Telnet SUPDUP Option", Stanford University-AI,
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 66]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ RFC-736, October 1977.
+
+ [27] Crispin, M., "SUPDUP Protocol", RFC-734, NIC 41953,
+ October 1977.
+
+ [28] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Carriage-Return Disposition
+ Option", RFC-652, October 1974.
+
+ [29] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Formfeed Disposition Option",
+ RFC-655, October 1974.
+
+ [30] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Linefeed Disposition", RFC-658,
+ October 1974.
+
+ [31] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Horizontal Tab Disposition
+ Option", RFC-654, October 1974.
+
+ [32] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Horizontal Tabstops Option",
+ RFC-653, October 1974.
+
+ [33] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Vertical Tab Disposition Option",
+ RFC-657, October 1974.
+
+ [34] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Vertical Tabstops Option",
+ RFC-656, October 1974.
+
+ [35] Crocker, D. and R. Gumpertz, "Revised Telnet Byte Marco
+ Option", RFC-735, November 1977.
+
+ [36] Croft, B., and J. Gilmore, "BOOTSTRAP Protocol (BOOTP)",
+ RFC-951, Stanford and SUN Microsytems, September 1985.
+
+ [37] Davin, J., J. Case, M. Fedor, and M. Schoffstall, "A Simple
+ Gateway Monitoring Protocol", RFC-1028, November 1987.
+
+ [38] Day, J., "Telnet Data Entry Terminal Option", RFC-732,
+ September 1977.
+
+ [39] DCA, "3270 Display System Protocol", #1981-08.
+
+ [40] DDN Protocol Handbook, "Telnet Output Line Width Option",
+ NIC 50005, December 1985.
+
+ [41] DDN Protocol Handbook, "Telnet Output Page Size Option",
+ NIC 50005, December 1985.
+
+ [42] DDN Protocol Handbook, "Telnet Reconnection Option",
+ NIC 50005, December 1985.
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 67]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [43] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting",
+ RFC-1112, Obsoletes RFC-988, RFC-1054, Stanford University,
+ August 1989.
+
+ [44] Elvy, M., and R. Nedved, "Network Mail Path Service", RFC-915,
+ Harvard and CMU, July 1986.
+
+ [45] Feinler, E., editor, "DDN Protocol Handbook", Network
+ Information Center, SRI International, December 1985.
+
+ [46] Feinler, E., editor, "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook",
+ Network Information Center, SRI International, March 1982.
+
+ [47] Feinler, E. and J. Postel, eds., "ARPANET Protocol Handbook",
+ NIC 7104, for the Defense Communications Agency by SRI
+ International, Menlo Park, California, Revised January 1978.
+
+ [48] Finlayson, R., T. Mann, J. Mogul, and M. Theimer, "A Reverse
+ Address Resolution Protocol", RFC-903, Stanford University,
+ June 1984.
+
+ [49] Forgie, J., "ST - A Proposed Internet Stream Protocol",
+ IEN 119, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, September 1979.
+
+ [50] Forsdick, H., "CFTP", Network Message, Bolt Beranek and
+ Newman, January 1982.
+
+ [51] Greenberg, B., "Telnet SUPDUP-OUTPUT Option", RFC-749,
+ MIT-Multics, September 1978.
+
+ [52] Harrenstien, K., "Name/Finger", RFC-742, NIC 42758,
+ SRI International, December 1977.
+
+ [53] Harrenstien, K., M. Stahl, and E. Feinler, "DOD Internet Host
+ Table Specification", RFC-952, Obsoletes RFC-810,
+ October 1985.
+
+ [54] Harrenstien, K., V. White, and E. Feinler, "Hostnames Server",
+ RFC-811, SRI International, March 1982.
+
+ [55] Harrenstien, K., and V. White, "Nicname/Whois", RFC-812,
+ SRI International, March 1982.
+
+ [56] Haverty, J., "XNET Formats for Internet Protocol Version 4",
+ IEN 158, October 1980.
+
+ [57] Hedrick, C., "Telnet Terminal Speed Option", RFC-1079,
+ Rutgers University, December 1988.
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 68]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [58] Hedrick, C., "Telnet Remote Flow Control Option",
+ RFC-1080, Rutgers University, December 1988.
+
+ [59] Hinden, R., "A Host Monitoring Protocol", RFC-869,
+ Bolt Beranek and Newman, December 1983.
+
+ [60] Hinden, R., and A. Sheltzer, "The DARPA Internet Gateway",
+ RFC-823, September 1982.
+
+ [61] Hornig, C., "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
+ over Ethernet Networks, RFC-894, Symbolics, April 1984.
+
+ [62] Internet Activities Board, J. Postel, Editor, "IAB Official
+ Protocol Standards", RFC-1130, Internet Activities
+ October 1989.
+
+ [63] International Standards Organization, "ISO Transport Protocol
+ Specification - ISO DP 8073", RFC-905, April 1984.
+
+ [64] International Standards Organization, "Protocol for Providing
+ the Connectionless-Mode Network Services", RFC-926, ISO,
+ December 1984.
+
+ [65] Kantor, B., and P. Lapsley, "Network News Transfer Protocol",
+ RFC-977, UC San Diego & UC Berkeley, February 1986.
+
+ [66] Kent, S., and J. Linn, "Privacy Enhancement for Internet
+ Electronic Mail: Part II -- Certificate-Based Key Management",
+ BBNCC and DEC, August 1989.
+
+ [67] Khanna, A., and A. Malis, "The ARPANET AHIP-E Host Access
+ Protocol (Enhanced AHIP)", RFC-1005, BBN Communications
+ Corporation, May 1987.
+
+ [68] Killian, E., "Telnet Send-Location Option", RFC-779,
+ April 1981.
+
+ [69] Korb, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
+ Over Public Data Networks", RFC-877, Purdue University,
+ September 1983.
+
+ [70] Levy, S., and T. Jacobson, "Telnet X.3 PAD Option", RFC-1053,
+ Minnesota Supercomputer Center, April 1988.
+
+ [71] Linn, J., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic
+ Mail: Part I: Message Encipherment and Authentication
+ Procedures", RFC-1113, Obsoletes RFC-989 and RFC-1040, DEC,
+ August 1989.
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 69]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [72] Linn, J., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic
+ Mail: Part III -- Algorithms, Modes, and Identifiers",
+ RFC-1115, DEC, August 1989.
+
+ [73] Lottor, M., "Simple File Transfer Protocol", RFC-913, MIT,
+ September 1984.
+
+ [74] M/A-COM Government Systems, "Dissimilar Gateway Protocol
+ Specification, Draft Version", Contract no. CS901145,
+ November 16, 1987.
+
+ [75] Marcy, G., "Telnet X Display Location Option", RFC-1096,
+ Carnegie Mellon University, March 1989.
+
+ [76] Malis, A., "Logical Addressing Implementation Specification",
+ BBN Report 5256, pp 31-36, May 1983.
+
+ [77] Malkin, G., "KNET/VM Command Message Protocol Functional
+ Overview", Spartacus, Inc., January 4, 1988.
+
+ [78] Metcalfe, R. M. and D. R. Boggs, "Ethernet: Distributed Packet
+ Switching for Local Computer Networks", Communications of the
+ ACM, 19 (7), pp 395-402, July 1976.
+
+ [79] Miller, T., "Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol", RFC-938,
+ ACC, February 1985.
+
+ [80] Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (Version 1), Specification
+ and Implementation", RFC-1059, University of Delaware,
+ July 1988.
+
+ [81] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and
+ Facilities", RFC-1034, Obsoletes RFCs 882, 883, and
+ 973, Information Sciences Institute, November 1987.
+
+ [82] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and
+ Specification", RFC-1035, Obsoletes RFCs 882, 883, and
+ 973, Information Sciences Institute, November 1987.
+
+ [83] Moy, J., "The OSPF Specification", RFC 1131, Proteon,
+ October 1989.
+
+ [84] Nedved, R., "Telnet Terminal Location Number Option", RFC-946,
+ Carnegie-Mellon University, May 1985.
+
+ [85] NSW Protocol Committee, "MSG: The Interprocess Communication
+ Facility for the National Software Works", CADD-7612-2411,
+ Massachusetts Computer Associates, BBN 3237, Bolt Beranek and
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 70]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ Newman, Revised December 1976.
+
+ [86] Onions, J., and M. Rose, "ISO-TP0 bridge between TCP
+ and X.25", RFC-1086, Nottingham, TWG, December 1988.
+
+ [87] Partridge, C. and G. Trewitt, The High-Level Entity Management
+ System (HEMS), RFCs 1021, 1022, 1023, and 1024, BBN/NNSC,
+ Stanford, October, 1987.
+
+ [88] Plummer, D., "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol or
+ Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48-bit Ethernet
+ Addresses for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", RFC-826,
+ MIT-LCS, November 1982.
+
+ [89] Postel, J., "Active Users", RFC-866, Information
+ Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [90] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "A Standard for the Transmission
+ of IP Datagrams over IEEE 802 Networks", RFC-1042,
+ USC/Information Sciences Institute, February 1988.
+
+ [91] Postel, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
+ over Experimental Ethernet Networks, RFC-895, Information
+ Sciences Institute, April 1984.
+
+ [92] Postel, J., "Character Generator Protocol", RFC-864,
+ Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [93] Postel, J., "Daytime Protocol", RFC-867, Information Sciences
+ Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [94] Postel, J., "Discard Protocol", RFC-863, Information Sciences
+ Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [95] Postel, J., "Echo Protocol", RFC-862, Information Sciences
+ Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [96] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", RFC-959,
+ Information Sciences Institute, October 1985.
+
+ [97] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol - DARPA
+ Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC-792,
+ Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
+
+ [98] Postel, J., "Internet Message Protocol", RFC-759, IEN 113,
+ Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.
+
+ [99] Postel, J., "Name Server", IEN 116, Information Sciences
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 71]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ Institute, August 1979.
+
+ [100] Postel, J., "Quote of the Day Protocol", RFC-865,
+ Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [101] Postel, J., "Remote Telnet Service", RFC-818,
+ Information Sciences Institute, November 1982.
+
+ [102] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC-821,
+ Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
+
+ [103] Postel, J., "Telnet End of Record Option", RFC-885,
+ Information Sciences Institute, December 1983.
+
+ [104] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", RFC-768
+ Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.
+
+ [105] Postel, J., ed., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program
+ Protocol Specification", RFC-791, Information Sciences
+ Institute, September 1981.
+
+ [106] Postel, J., ed., "Transmission Control Protocol - DARPA
+ Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC-793,
+ Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
+
+ [107] Postel, J. and D. Crocker, "Remote Controlled Transmission and
+ Echoing Telnet Option", RFC-726, March 1977.
+
+ [108] Postel, J., and K. Harrenstien, "Time Protocol", RFC-868,
+ Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [109] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Extended Options - List
+ Option", RFC-861, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [110] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Binary Transmission",
+ RFC-856, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [111] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Echo Option", RFC-857,
+ Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [112] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification",
+ RFC-854, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [113] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Status Option", RFC-859,
+ Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [114] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Suppress Go Ahead Option",
+ RFC-858, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 72]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [115] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Timing Mark Option",
+ RFC-860, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [116] Rekhter, J., "Telnet 3270 Regime Option", RFC-1041,
+ IBM, January 1988.
+
+ [117] Reynolds, J., "BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions",
+ RFC 1084, Information Sciences Institute, December 1988.
+
+ [118] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Official Internet Protocols",
+ RFC-1011, USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1987.
+
+ [119] Romano, S., M. Stahl, and M. Recker, "Internet Numbers",
+ RFC-1117, SRI-NIC, August 1989.
+
+ [120] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
+ Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", RFC-1065,
+ TWG, August 1988.
+
+ [121] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Management Information Base for
+ Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", RFC-1066,
+ TWG, August 1988.
+
+ [122] Rose, M., "Post Office Protocol - Version 3", RFC-1081,
+ TWG, November 1988.
+
+ [123] Seamonson, L. J., and E. C. Rosen, "STUB" Exterior Gateway
+ Protocol", RFC-888, BBN Communications Corporation,
+ January 1984.
+
+ [124] Shuttleworth, B., "A Documentary of MFENet, a National
+ Computer Network", UCRL-52317, Lawrence Livermore Labs,
+ Livermore, California, June 1977.
+
+ [125] Silverman, S., "Output Marking Telnet Option", RFC-933, MITRE,
+ January 1985.
+
+ [126] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", RFC-783,
+ MIT/LCS, June 1981.
+
+ [127] Solomon, M., L. Landweber, and D. Neuhengen, "The CSNET Name
+ Server", Computer Networks, v.6, n.3, pp. 161-172, July 1982.
+
+ [128] Solomon, M., and E. Wimmers, "Telnet Terminal Type Option",
+ RFC-930, Supercedes RFC-884, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
+ January 1985.
+
+ [129] Sproull, R., and E. Thomas, "A Networks Graphics Protocol",
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 73]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ NIC 24308, August 1974.
+
+ [130] St. Johns, M., "Authentication Service", RFC-931, TPSC,
+ January 1985.
+
+ [131] Tappan, D., "The CRONUS Virtual Local Network", RFC-824,
+ Bolt Beranek and Newman, August 1982.
+
+ [132] Taylor, J., "ERPC Functional Specification", Version 1.04,
+ HYDRA Computer Systems, Inc., July 1984.
+
+ [133] "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network: Data Link Layer and
+ Physical Layer Specification", AA-K759B-TK, Digital Equipment
+ Corporation, Maynard, MA. Also as: "The Ethernet - A Local
+ Area Network", Version 1.0, Digital Equipment Corporation,
+ Intel Corporation, Xerox Corporation, September 1980. And:
+ "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network: Data Link Layer and
+ Physical Layer Specifications", Digital, Intel and Xerox,
+ November 1982. And: XEROX, "The Ethernet, A Local Area
+ Network: Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specification",
+ X3T51/80-50, Xerox Corporation, Stamford, CT., October 1980.
+
+ [134] The High Level Protocol Group, "A Network Independent File
+ Transfer Protocol", INWG Protocol Note 86, December 1977.
+
+ [135] Thomas, Bob, "The Interhost Protocol to Support CRONUS/DIAMOND
+ Interprocess Communication", BBN, September 1983.
+
+ [136] Tovar, "Telnet Extended ASCII Option", RFC-698, Stanford
+ University-AI, July 1975.
+
+ [137] Uttal, J., J. Rothschild, and C. Kline, "Transparent
+ Integration of UNIX and MS-DOS", Locus Computing Corporation.
+
+ [138] Velten, D., R. Hinden, and J. Sax, "Reliable Data Protocol",
+ RFC-908, BBN Communications Corporation, July 1984.
+
+ [139] Waitzman, D., "Telnet Window Size Option", RFC-1073,
+ BBN STC, October, 1988.
+
+ [140] Waitzman, D., C. Partridge, and S. Deering
+ "Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol", RFC-1075,
+ BBN STC and Stanford University, November 1988.
+
+ [141] Wancho, F., "Password Generator Protocol", RFC-972, WSMR,
+ January 1986.
+
+ [142] Warrier, U., and L. Besaw, "The Common Management
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 74]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ Information Services and Protocol over TCP/IP (CMOT)",
+ RFC-1095, Unisys Corp. and Hewlett-Packard, April 1989.
+
+ [143] Welch, B., "The Sprite Remote Procedure Call System",
+ Technical Report, UCB/Computer Science Dept., 86/302,
+ University of California at Berkeley, June 1986.
+
+ [144] Xerox, "Courier: The Remote Procedure Protocol", XSIS 038112,
+ December 1981.
+
+ [145] Yasuda, A., and T. Thompson, "TELNET Data Entry Terminal
+ Option DODIIS Implementation", RFC-1043, DIA, February 1988.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 75]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ PEOPLE
+
+
+ [AB20] Art Berggreen ACC art@SALT.ACC.ARPA
+
+ [ABB2] A. Blasco Bonito CNUCE blasco@ICNUCEVM.CNUCE.CNR.IT
+
+ [AD14] Annette DeSchon ISI DESCHON@ISI.EDU
+
+ [AGM] Andy Malis BBN Malis@BBN.COM
+
+ [AKH5] Arthur Hartwig UQNET
+ munnari!wombat.decnet.uq.oz.au!ccarthur@UUNET.UU.NET
+
+ [ANM2] April N. Marine SRI APRIL@NIC.DDN.MIL
+
+ [AW90] Amanda Walker Intercon AMANDA@INTERCON.COM
+
+ [AXB] Albert G. Broscius UPENN broscius@DSL.CIS.UPENN.EDU
+
+ [AXB1] Amatzia Ben-Artzi ---none---
+
+ [AXC] Andrew Cherenson SGI arc@SGI.COM
+
+ [AXC1] Anthony Chung Sytek
+ sytek!syteka!anthony@HPLABS.HP.COM
+
+ [AXC2] Asheem Chandna AT&T ac0@mtuxo.att.com
+
+ [AXM] Alex Martin Retix ---none---
+
+ [AXS] Arthur Salazar Locus lcc.arthur@SEAS.UCLA.EDU
+
+ [BA4] Brian Anderson BBN baanders@CCQ.BBN.COM
+
+ [BB257] Brian W. Brown SynOptics BBROWN@MVIS1.SYNOPTICS.COM
+
+ [BCH2] Barry Howard LLL Howard@NMFECC.ARPA
+
+ [BCN] Clifford B. Newman UWASH bcn@CS.WASHINGTON.EDU
+
+ [BD70] Bernd Doleschal SEL Doleschal@A.ISI.EDU
+
+ [BH144] Bridget Halsey Banyan bah@BANYAN.BANYAN.COM
+
+ [BJR2] Bill Russell NYU russell@cmcl2.NYU.EDU
+
+ [BKR] Brian Reid DEC reid@DECWRL.DEC.COM
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 76]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [BP52] Brad Parker CAYMAN brad@cayman.Cayman.COM
+
+ [BS221] Bob Stewart Xyplex STEWART@XYPLEX.COM
+
+ [BWB6] Barry Boehm DARPA boehm@DARPA.MIL
+
+ [BXA] Bill Anderson MITRE wda@MITRE-BEDFORD.ORG
+
+ [BXB] Brad Benson Touch ---none---
+
+ [BXE] Brian A. Ehrmantraut Auspex Systems bae@auspex.com
+
+ [BXH] Brian Horn Locus ---none---
+
+ [BXL] Brian Lloyd SIRIUS ---none---
+
+ [BXN] Bill Norton Merit wbn@MERIT.EDU
+
+ [BXV] Bill Versteeg NRC bvs@NRC.COM
+
+ [BXW] Brent Welch Sprite
+ brent%sprite.berkeley.edu@GINGER.BERKELEY.EDU
+
+ [BXW1] Bruce Willins Raycom ---none---
+
+ [BXZ] Bob Zaniolo Reuter ---none---
+
+ [CLH3] Charles Hedrick RUTGERS HEDRICK@ARAMIS.RUTGERS.EDU
+
+ [CMR] Craig Rogers ISI Rogers@ISI.EDU
+
+ [CXM] Charles Marker II MIPS marker@MIPS.COM
+
+ [CXT] Christopher Tengi Princeton tengi@Princeton.EDU
+
+ [DAG4] David A. Gomberg MITRE gomberg@GATEWAY.MITRE.ORG
+
+ [DB14] Dave Borman Cray dab@CRAY.COM
+
+ [DC126] Dick Cogger Cornell rhx@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU
+
+ [DCP1] David Plummer MIT DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA
+
+ [DDC1] David Clark MIT ddc@LCS.MIT.EDU
+
+ [DJK13] David Kaufman DeskTalk ---none---
+
+ [DLM1] David Mills LINKABIT Mills@HUEY.UDEL.EDU
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 77]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [DM28] Dennis Morris DCA Morrisd@IMO-UVAX.DCA.MIL
+
+ [DM280] Dave Mackie NCD lupine!djm@UUNET.UU.NET
+
+ [DM354] Don McWilliam UBC mcwillm@CC.UBC.CA
+
+ [DPR] David Reed MIT-LCS Reed@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
+
+ [DRC3] Dave Cheriton STANFORD
+ cheriton@PESCADERO.STANFORD.EDU
+
+ [DT15] Daniel Tappan BBN Tappan@BBN.COM
+
+ [DW181] David Wolfe SRI ctabka@TSCA.ISTC.SRI.COM
+
+ [DW183] David Waitzman BBN dwaitzman@BBN.COM
+
+ [DXB] Dave Buehmann Intergraph ingr!daveb@UUNET.UU.NET
+
+ [DXD] Dennis J.W. Dube VIA SYSTEMS ---none---
+
+ [DXG] David Goldberg SMI sun!dg@UCBARPA.BERKELEY.EDU
+
+ [DXK] Doug Karl OSU
+ KARL-D@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU
+
+ [DXM] Didier Moretti Ungermann-Bass ---none---
+
+ [DXM1] Donna McMalster David Systems ---none---
+
+ [DXP] Dave Preston CMC ---none---
+
+ [DY26] Dennis Yaro SUN yaro@SUN.COM
+
+ [EAK4] Earl Killian LLL EAK@MORDOR.S1.GOV
+
+ [EBM] Eliot Moss MIT EBM@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU
+
+ [EP53] Eric Peterson Locus lcc.eric@SEAS.UCLA.EDU
+
+ [EXC] Ed Cain DCA cain@edn-unix.dca.mil
+
+ [EXR] Eric Rubin FiberCom err@FIBERCOM.COM
+
+ [EXR1] Efrat Ramati Lannet Co. ---none---
+
+ [FB77] Fred Baker Vitalink baker%vitam6@UUNET.UU.NET
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 78]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [FJK2] Frank Kastenholz Interlan KASTEN@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
+
+ [FJW] Frank J. Wancho WSMR WANCHO@SIMTEL20.ARPA
+
+ [FXB1] Felix Burton DIAB FB@DIAB.SE
+
+ [GAL5] Guillermo A. Loyola IBM LOYOLA@IBM.COM
+
+ [GB7] Gerd Beling FGAN GBELING@ISI.EDU
+
+ [GEOF] Geoff Goodfellow OSD Geoff@FERNWOOD.MPK.CA.US
+
+ [GGB2] Geoff Baehr SUN geoffb@ENG.SUN.COM
+
+ [GM23] Glenn Marcy CMU Glenn.Marcy@A.CS.CMU.EDU
+
+ [GS2] Greg Satz cisco satz@CISCO.COM
+
+ [GS123] Geof Stone NSC geof@NETWORK.COM
+
+ [GSM11] Gary S. Malkin Proteon gmalkin@PROTEON.COM
+
+ [GXG] Gil Greebaum Unisys gcole@nisd.cam.unisys.com
+
+ [GXP] Gill Pratt MIT gill%mit-ccc@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU
+
+ [GXS] Guenther Schreiner LINK
+ guenther%ira.uka.de@RELAY.CS.NET
+
+ [GXT] Glenn Trewitt STANFORD trewitt@AMADEUS.STANFORD.EDU
+
+ [GXT1] Gene Tsudik USC tsudik@USC.EDU
+
+ [GXW] Glenn Waters Bell Northern gwaters@BNR.CA
+
+ [HCF2] Harry Forsdick BBN Forsdick@BBN.COM
+
+ [HS23] Hokey Stenn Plus5 hokey@PLUS5.COM
+
+ [HWB] Hans-Werner Braun MICHIGAN HWB@MCR.UMICH.EDU
+
+ [HXE] Hunaid Engineer Cray hunaid@OPUS.CRAY.COM
+
+ [HXK] Henry Kaijak Gandalf ---none---
+
+ [IEEE] Vince Condello IEEE ---none---
+
+ [JAG] James Gosling SUN JAG@SUN.COM
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 79]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [JB478] Jonathan Biggar Netlabs jon@netlabs.com
+
+ [JBP] Jon Postel ISI Postel@ISI.EDU
+
+ [JBW1] Joseph Walters, Jr. BBN JWalters@BBN.COM
+
+ [JCB1] John Burruss BBN JBurruss@VAX.BBN.COM
+
+ [JCM48] Jeff Mogul DEC mogul@DECWRL.DEC.COM
+
+ [JD21] Jonathan Dreyer BBN Dreyer@CCV.BBN.COM
+
+ [JDC20] Jeffrey Case UTK case@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU
+
+ [JFH2] Jack Haverty BBN JHaverty@BBN.COM
+
+ [JFW] Jon F. Wilkes STC Wilkes@CCINT1.RSRE.MOD.UK
+
+ [JGH] Jim Herman BBN Herman@CCJ.BBN.COM
+
+ [JJB25] John Bowe BBN jbowe@PINEAPPLE.BBN.COM
+
+ [JKR1] Joyce K. Reynolds ISI JKRey@ISI.EDU
+
+ [JR35] Jon Rochlis MIT jon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
+
+ [JRL3] John LoVerso Xylogics loverso@XYLOGICS.COM
+
+ [JS28] John A. Shriver Proteon jas@PROTEON.COM
+
+ [JTM4] John Moy Proteon jmoy@PROTEON.COM
+
+ [JWF] Jim Forgie MIT/LL FORGIE@XN.LL.MIT.EDU
+
+ [JXB] Jeffrey Buffun Apollo jbuffum@APOLLO.COM
+
+ [JXC] John Cook Chipcom cook@chipcom.com
+
+ [JXE2] Jeanne Evans UKMOD JME%RSRE.MOD.UK@CS.UCL.AC.UK
+
+ [JXF] Josh Fielk Optical Data Systems ---none---
+
+ [JXG] Jerry Geisler Boeing ---none---
+
+ [JXG1] Jim Greuel HP jimg%hpcndpc@hplabs.hp.com
+
+ [JXH] Jeff Honig Cornell jch@sonne.tn.cornell.edu
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 80]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [JXH1] Jim Hayes Apple Hayes@APPLE.COM
+
+ [JXI] Jon Infante ICL ---none---
+
+ [JXM] Joseph Murdock Network Resources Corporation
+ ---none---
+
+ [JXO] Jack O'Neil ENCORE ---none---
+
+ [JXO1] Jerrilynn Okamura Ontologic ---none---
+
+ [JXO2] Jarkko Oikarinen Tolsun jto@TOLSUN.OULU.FI
+
+ [JXP] Joe Pato Apollo apollo!pato@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
+
+ [JXR] Jacob Rekhter IBM Yakov@IBM.COM
+
+ [JXS] Jim Stevens Rockwell Stevens@ISI.EDU
+
+ [JXS1] John Sancho CastleRock ---none---
+
+ [KAA] Ken Adelman TGV, Inc. Adelman@TGV.COM
+
+ [KA4] Karl Auerbach Epilogue auerbach@csl.sri.com
+
+ [KH43] Kathy Huber BBN khuber@bbn.com
+
+ [KLH] Ken Harrenstien SRI KLH@NIC.DDN.MIL
+
+ [KR35] Keith Reynolds SCO keithr@SCO.COM
+
+ [KSL] Kirk Lougheed cisco LOUGHEED@MATHOM.CISCO.COM
+
+ [KXD] Kevin DeVault NI ---none---
+
+ [KXS] Keith Sklower Berkeley sklower@okeeffe.berkeley.edu
+
+ [KXW] Ken Whitfield MCNC ken@MCNC.ORG
+
+ [KZM] Keith McCloghrie TWG kzm@TWG.ARPA
+
+ [LL69] Lawrence Lebahn DIA DIA3@PAXRV-NES.NAVY.MIL
+
+ [LLP] Larry Peterson ARIZONA llp@ARIZONA.EDU
+
+ [LXE] Len Edmondson SUN len@TOPS.SUN.COM
+
+ [LXF] Larry Fischer DSS lfischer@dss.com
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 81]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [LXH] Leo Hourvitz NeXt leo@NEXT.COM
+
+ [MA] Mike Accetta CMU MIKE.ACCETTA@CMU-CS-A.EDU
+
+ [MARY] Mary K. Stahl SRI Stahl@NIC.DDN.MIL
+
+ [MAR10] Mark A. Rosenstein MIT mar@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
+
+ [MB] Michael Brescia BBN Brescia@CCV.BBN.COM
+
+ [MBG] Michael Greenwald SYMBOLICS
+ Greenwald@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA
+
+ [MCSJ] Mike StJohns TPSC StJohns@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
+
+ [ME38] Marc A. Elvy Marble ELVY@CARRARA.MARBLE.COM
+
+ [MKL] Mark Lottor SRI MKL@NIC.DDN.MIL
+
+ [ML109] Mike Little MACOM little@MACOM4.ARPA
+
+ [MLS34] L. Michael Sabo TMAC darth!eniac!sabo@Sun.Com
+
+ [MO2] Michael O'Brien AEROSPACE obrien@AEROSPACE.AERO.ORG
+
+ [MRC] Mark Crispin Simtel MRC@SIMTEL20.ARPA
+
+ [MS9] Marty Schoffstahl Nysernet schoff@NISC.NYSER.NET
+
+ [MS56] Marvin Solomon WISC solomon@CS.WISC.EDU
+
+ [MXB] Mike Berrow Relational Technology ---none---
+
+ [MXB1] Mike Burrows DEC burrows@SRC.DEC.COM
+
+ [MXL] Mark L. Lambert MIT markl@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU
+
+ [MXP] Martin Picard Oracle ---none---
+
+ [MXS] Mike Spina Prime
+ WIZARD%enr.prime.com@RELAY.CS.NET
+
+ [MXW] Michael Waters EON ---none---
+
+ [NC3] J. Noel Chiappa MIT JNC@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU
+
+ [NT12] Neil Todd IST
+ mcvax!ist.co.uk!neil@UUNET.UU.NET
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 82]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [PAM6] Paul McNabb RICE pam@PURDUE.EDU
+
+ [PCW] C. Philip Wood LANL cpw@LANL.GOV
+
+ [PD39] Pete Delaney ECRC
+ pete%ecrcvax@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
+
+ [PHD1] Pieter Ditmars BBN pditmars@BBN.COM
+
+ [PK] Peter Kirstein UCL Kirstein@NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK
+
+ [PL4] Phil Lapsley BERKELEY phil@UCBARPA.BERKELEY.EDU
+
+ [PM1] Paul Mockapetris ISI PVM@ISI.EDU
+
+ [PXK] Philip Koch Dartmouth Philip.Koch@DARTMOUTH.EDU
+
+ [RAM57] Rex Mann CDC ---none---
+
+ [RDXS] R. Dwight Schettler HP rds%hpcndm@HPLABS.HP.COM
+
+ [RH6] Robert Hinden BBN Hinden@CCV.BBN.COM
+
+ [RHT] Robert Thomas BBN BThomas@F.BBN.COM
+
+ [RN6] Rudy Nedved CMU Rudy.Nedved@CMU-CS-A.EDU
+
+ [RTB3] Bob Braden ISI Braden@ISI.EDU
+
+ [RWS4] Robert W. Scheifler ARGUS RWS@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU
+
+ [RXB] Ramesh Babu Excelan
+ mtxinu!excelan!ramesh@UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU
+
+ [RXB1] Ron Bhanukitsiri DEC rbhank@DECVAX.DEC.COM
+
+ [RXC] Rob Chandhok CMU chandhok@gnome.cs.cmu.edu
+
+ [RXC1] Rick Carlos TI rick.ticipa.csc.ti.com
+
+ [RXD] Roger Dev Cabletron ---none---
+
+ [RXD1] Ralph Droms NRI rdroms@NRI.RESTON.VA.US
+
+ [RXH] Reijane Huai Cheyenne sibal@CSD2.NYU.EDU
+
+ [RXJ] Ronald Jacoby SGI rj@SGI.COM
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 83]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [RXM] Robert Myhill BBN Myhill@CCS.BBN.COM
+
+ [RXN] Rina Nethaniel RND ---none---
+
+ [RXS] Ron Strich SSDS ---none---
+
+ [RXT] Ron Thornton GenRad thornton@qm7501.genrad.com
+
+ [RXZ] Rayan Zachariassen Toronto rayan@AI.TORONTO.EDU
+
+ [SA1] Sten Andler IBM
+ andler.ibm-sj@RAND-RELAY.ARPA
+
+ [SAF3] Stuart A. Friedberg UWISC stuart@CS.WISC.EDU
+
+ [SB98] Stan Barber BCM SOB@BCM.TMC.EDU
+
+ [SC3] Steve Casner ISI Casner@ISI.EDU
+
+ [SGC] Steve Chipman BBN Chipman@F.BBN.COM
+
+ [SHB] Steven Blumenthal BBN BLUMENTHAL@VAX.BBN.COM
+
+ [SH37] Sergio Heker JVNC heker@JVNCC.CSC.ORG
+
+ [SL70] Stuart Levy UMN slevy@UC.MSC.UMN.EDU
+
+ [SRN1] Stephen Northcutt NSWC SNORTHC@RELAY-NSWC.NAVY.MIL
+
+ [SS92] Steve Schoch NASA SCHOCH@AMES.ARC.NASA.GOV
+
+ [SXA] Susie Armstrong XEROX Armstrong.wbst128@XEROX.COM
+
+ [SXB] Scott Bellows Purdue smb@cs.purdue.edu
+
+ [SXC] Steve Conklin Intergraph tesla!steve@ingr.com
+
+ [SXD] Steve Deering Stanford deering@PECASERO.STANFORD.EDU
+
+ [SXH] Steven Hunter LLNL hunter@CCC.MFECC.LLNL.GOV
+
+ [SXK] Skip Koppenhaver DAC stubby!skip@uunet.UU.NET
+
+ [SXL] Sam Lau Pirelli/Focom ---none---
+
+ [SXP] Sanand Patel Canstar sanand@HUB.TORONTO.EDU
+
+ [SXS] Steve Silverman MITRE Blankert@MITRE-GATEWAY.ORG
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 84]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [SXS1] Susie Snitzer Britton-Lee ---none---
+
+ [SXW] Steve Waldbusser CMU sw01+@andrew.cmu.edu
+
+ [TB6] Todd Baker 3COM tzb@BRIDGE2.3COM.COM
+
+ [TC27] Thomas Calderwood BBN TCALDERW@BBN.COM
+
+ [TN] Thomas Narten Purdue narten@PURDUE.EDU
+
+ [TU] Tom Unger UMich tom@CITI.UMICH.EDU
+
+ [TXM] Trudy Miller ACC Trudy@ACC.ARPA
+
+ [TXR] Tim Rylance Praxis praxis!tkr@UUNET.UU.NET
+
+ [TXS] Ted J. Socolofsky Spider Teds@SPIDER.CO.UK
+
+ [UB3] Ulf Bilting CHALMERS bilting@PURDUE.EDU
+
+ [UW2] Unni Warrier Netlabs unni@NETLABS.COM
+
+ [VXS] Vinod Singh Unify ---none---
+
+ [VXT] V. Taylor CANADA vktaylor@NCS.DND.CA
+
+ [WDW11] William D. Wisner wisner@HAYES.FAI.ALASKA.EDU
+
+ [WJC2] Bill Croft STANFORD Croft@SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU
+
+ [WJS1] Weldon J. Showalter DCA Gamma@EDN-UNIX.ARPA
+
+ [WLB8] William L. Biagi Advintech
+ CSS002.BLBIAGI@ADVINTECH-MVS.ARPA
+
+ [WM3] William Melohn SUN Melohn@SUN.COM
+
+ [WXS] Wayne Schroeder SDSC schroeder@SDS.SDSC.EDU
+
+ [VXW] Val Wilson Spider
+ cvax!spider.co.uk!val@uunet.UU.NET
+
+ [YXK] Yoav Kluger Spartacus ykluger@HAWK.ULOWELL.EDU
+
+ [YXW] Y.C. Wang Network Application Technology
+ ---none---
+
+ [XEROX] Fonda Pallone Xerox ---none---
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 85]
+
+RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990
+
+
+ [ZSU] Zaw-Sing Su SRI ZSu@TSCA.ISTC.SRI.COM
+
+Security Considerations
+
+ Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
+
+Authors' Addresses:
+
+ Joyce K. Reynolds
+ University of Southern California
+ Information Sciences Institute
+ 4676 Admiralty Way
+ Marina del Rey, CA 90292
+
+ Phone: (213) 822-1511
+
+ Email: JKREY@ISI.EDU
+
+
+ Jon Postel
+ University of Southern California
+ Information Sciences Institute
+ 4676 Admiralty Way
+ Marina del Rey, CA 90292
+
+ Phone: (213) 822-1511
+
+ Email: POSTEL@ISI.EDU
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Reynolds & Postel [Page 86]
+ \ No newline at end of file